SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP)
          Practice Guide
2
Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP) Practice Guide



Table of Contents
     Audience .....................................................................................................................4
     Summary .....................................................................................................................4
     1. Server Sizing ...........................................................................................................5
     2. Client Level Quality of Service.................................................................................5
     3. Choose your Distribution .........................................................................................6
           3.1 Considerations ..............................................................................................6
           3.2 Recommendations ........................................................................................6
     4 Redundancy .............................................................................................................6
     5. Clients .....................................................................................................................7
     6. Security ...................................................................................................................7
     7. Other Considerations ..............................................................................................8
     8. Authentication..........................................................................................................8
     9. Distributing Hardware Resources............................................................................8
     10. Advocacy...............................................................................................................8
     11. Guest Terminals ....................................................................................................9
     12. Calculating Costs ..................................................................................................9
           12.1 Long term costs ..........................................................................................9
           12.2 Migration .....................................................................................................9
           12.3 Legacy Software .......................................................................................10
     13. Incremental Deployment......................................................................................10
     Appendix A - Glossary...............................................................................................11
     Appendix B - Example Costing Scenario...................................................................13
        Ongoing Costs ......................................................................................................13
        …Old System ........................................................................................................13
        …New System ......................................................................................................13
        …and Migration Costs...........................................................................................14
        Summary...............................................................................................................14




Author
Ben Green, ben@bristolwireless.net
(April 2007)




                                                                                                                                    3
Audience
This guide is aimed at a technically oriented audience.

Summary
Organisations that use Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP) to add thin-client support to
Linux servers have speedier applications, easier application deployment, lower software
cost and much lower administration cost.
LTSP is a FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) project. LTSP (Linux Terminal Server
Project) is a set of tools for allowing low specification computers to connect to a central
server. Users of these remote computers may log in to the server and use applications
there, or run applications locally on the client.
LTSP is most easily applied to office systems. Shortcomings for other types of
applications, such as sound programs, may be overcome by additional configuration, and
by a number of new LTSP technologies like local device support.
LTSP can reduce cost and power use in situations where there are as few as two
concurrent users on one system.
Advantages of LTSP over proprietary solutions include:
      Lower administration costs
      Lower hardware costs
      Lower power consumption
      Greater application speed
      It is a Free and Open Source solution
Use LTSP wherever there are no reasons not to. Increased set up and maintenance
difficulties arise when particular legacy applications need supporting. LTSP is not currently
appropriate where very high performance multimedia tasks are being undertaken such as:
      Live music performance
      Video editing
Migration costs may be the only factor limiting uptake. Deployment may be partial and also
incremental.
This document deals with issues of deployment including software and hardware choices,
maintaining services, legacy applications and calculating total costs for a migration.




                                                                                              4
1. Server Sizing
For system of less than 40 users a single dual cored server should be adequate,
depending on the demands put upon it. Beyond that, some separation of services should
be considered.
On older Intel systems the cost of switching tasks between different processors in SMP
systems was high, meaning bad performance under load and unresponsive applications.
Avoid these architectures.
      Scale to your needs – remember to pitch your systems at the maximum number of
      terminals you will need. Designing a system that will scale to an appropriate size
      means you can add more capacity.
      Think about your applications load – qualify and quantify the particular
      applications people will be running and consider policies that limit users or
      workstations to specific applications.
      An appropriate desktop environment (DE)– for users with limited application use,
      a lower impact DE can cut down considerably on memory use. Those suitable for
      LTSP include XFCE4, JWM, ICEWM and Flux Box.
      Multi-processor systems are good – SMP systems ensure that no one user can
      dominate the computer's resources, and no additional configuration is necessary to
      achieve this. The maximum speed any single threaded application can run is that of
      the largest single processing unit; hence each individual processor needs to be
      fairly fast to maintain responsive applications.
      Work out your maximum memory constraints – things move very slowly when
      swap space is being used. Make sure you have enough main memory to run all
      your applications without swapping. This demands experience of application use in
      a multi-user environment.
      http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/ServerSizing
      http://virtualthreads.blogspot.com/2006/02/understanding-memory-usage-on-
      linux.html (how to properly measure memory use on Linux)

2. Client Level Quality of Service
      No hoggers – A robust LTSP system must ensure that no one can hog the
      application server's computer resources. A variety of Unix tools can be used to
      achieve this including:
         Network traffic shaping on the internal network per client
         Process limits per user
         File system quotas per user
      No problem on small systems – The Linux kernel usually does a good job by
      itself, balancing demanding processes and clearing memory of used code. Dead
      processes may build up. Use disk swap to provide an area where these processes
      can reside outside of main memory.
      http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/LinuxTutorialQuotas.html (filesystem quotaing)
      http://gentoo-wiki.com/SECURITY_Limit_User_Processes (process limits)


                                                                                          5
3. Choose your Distribution

3.1 Considerations
       Software available – whatever software is available to the server will also be
       available to the clients. Choose an operating system that has the software you want
       your users to be able to use, or one that you are comfortable customizing
       applications for.
       Support – if you need external software support for your server systems, choose a
       distribution with a support structure you like.
       LTSP integration – LTSP-5.0 is integrated into distributions, rather than being a
       separate install. This system has the best support for local applications and uses
       the distribution's own package management system to build the client image. If you
       wish to use local applications, use a distribution supporting LTSP-5.0
       http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/Ltsp5Status (status of LTSP-5 integration)

3.2 Recommendations
Debian is at the time of writing the only distribution with a record of high security and
stability that contains a wide range of packages. The package count for the next stable
release is getting on for 20,000. This wealth of software includes most good stable and
actively maintained open source releases. For a flexible, sustainable and completely free
solution for LTSP, Debian is highly recommended. LTSP-5.0 support is also good in
Debian - and LTSP-4.2 works very well too.
An often cited disadvantage of Debian is that the stable releases are outdated at release
because of their long release cycle - the incredible pace of Linux development means that
users can miss out on innovations for some time. Issues of hardware support are not
prevalent in LTSP environments.
For an off the peg educational solution, K12LTSP is also recommended. Note however
that an easy installation does not necessarily mean an easily upgradable long term
solution.
The Debian project with similar aims to K12LTSP is DebianEdu. There is an associated
live CD project called SkoleLinux.
http://debian.org
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu (and the English language Skolelinux page)
http://k12ltsp.org

4 Redundancy
Managing data and service redundancy are both relatively easy in a thin client system
because data is located on few servers, or often just the one. Research appropriate
strategies after ascertaining your user requirements.
       Split application servers – In a large LTSP system applications can be split
       between a number of servers. For example, each client may connect to a different
       application server based upon which server is least loaded. Home directories may
       be shared via a distributed file system.
       Keep backups – data redundancy for users is essential. Back up the system and
                                                                                             6
home directories via mirroring or a RAID set up.
       TFTP, DHCP, NFS, X – these are LTSP's essential services. The server(s)
       providing X and NFS will also be serving the applications. Separating the other two
       services is possible.
http://republico.estv.ipv.pt/~nmct/ltsp/ha/ (high availability through 2 application servers)
http://www1.uni-hamburg.de/RRZ/W.Buech/LTC-linux-kongress.pdf (another method of
application load balancing through clusters).
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9097 (splitting all the LTSP services out as much as
possible)

5. Clients
Higher transistor densities mean computing systems use less power. Thin clients don't
need much processing power unless local applications are being used. High speed
graphical interfaces are more crucial to user interactiveness than high processing speed.
The newer the technology a thin client uses, the lower the power.
Recent systems based on the SiS SoC (system on a chip) have produced clients with
excellent graphical capabilities and typical power usage of 5W. This figure is likely to
become more common place, though around 20W is more typical for a thin client in the
current market. For re-purposed desktop machine power usage will probably at least 40W.
       Use low power – with increasing power costs the sustainability of computer
       systems depends increasingly on their power consumption performance. Clients are
       available that run on as little as 5W each, and 15” monitors at 14W. Research and
       test in use before buying.
       Check power requirements if you are re-using old hardware – LTSP systems
       using old desktops converted to LTSP can reduce power consumption hugely over
       standalone systems. Remove hard drives and other unused peripherals to save the
       most power. Consider underclocking and fan removal to further reduce power use.
       Research and test power use.
       Convert clients using PXE Ethernet cards – second hand PXE based cards are a
       very cheap way to get thin clients booting, requiring only that they have a PCI slot.

6. Security
       Separated networks – application data passes over LTSP networks unencrypted.
       Separation of open and thin client networks reduces the chance of intrusion.
       Physically secure the network – protect users from compromising person/
       personal data by ensuring the LTSP segment is not accessible to other users.
       Local Data Manager (LDM) – open networks might be vulnerable to snooping, use
       the LDM login manager to provide a secure session over SSH.
       Remote shut-down – clients can be shut down remotely using the ltspadmin
       command, saving time and energy and allowing a quick response in the event of a
       security compromise.
       Client monitoring – you can monitor clients by running a VNC server on each of
       them.
       Turn off diagnostics – some diagnostic features of LTSP have security issues.
                                                                                                7
Make sure they are turned off in a production system.
http://www.geocities.com/hammerjw/ltsp-basic_security.html (basic guide to LTSP
security)
http://www.k12ltsp.org/mediawiki/index.php/Using_VNC_to_shadow_clients (monitoring
client desktops)

7. Other Considerations
      Sound support for limited applications – due to the lack of a common network
      transparent sound API for Linux, remote sound needs to be set up on a per
      application basis. Latency is a problem. Use local applications to run sound
      applications locally. Don't expect to edit video via LTSP. For music software local
      applications may be used.
      Local storage devices – current LTSP implementation means that reading local
      media is easy. Writing local USB keys and floppy disks is also simple. Encourage
      temporary account users to write data to USB keys rather than to their local
      account.
      WEEE directives - the WEEE directive means that disposing of unused hardware
      is becoming more expensive. This should be taken into consideration when costing
      LTSP solutions against 'buy new' alternatives: LTSP often facilitates effective reuse
      of old equipment.

8. Authentication
      Central Authentication – consider LDAP for medium to large organisations as a
      way to consolidate user data across a range of applications and services, including
      LTSP.
   http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/LDAP

9. Distributing Hardware Resources
      Local applications – in LTSP-5.0 it's easy to run applications on the clients rather
      than the server. Use this feature to reduce the processor load on the server, make
      sound applications very easy to configure, and video applications work with better
      A/V synchronisation.
      Swap – give clients with limited RAM a swap cache on the server using NBD. This
      is a standard LTSP feature.

10. Advocacy
The following are the main selling points of LTSP:
      It feels like you are on the mainframe – applications load and run on the fastest
      machine in your network.
      Low cost – lower hardware costs, reuse of old equipment.
      Low power – power consumption reductions of 50% and beyond.
      Low maintenance – maintenance hours are lower than 10% of those for
      standalone systems.

                                                                                             8
No software costs – free software may be used for no monetary cost.
       Lower migration costs – the cost of moving to an LTSP system from a Windows
       system is lower than moving from a Windows system to a standalone system.
   http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/SuccessStories

11. Guest Terminals
Along with normal users, some terminals on your system may need to log in automatically
and provide limited functionality. In an internet café or public access suite, this might be
the only type of access to be allowed. Make the following considerations:
       KDM – the K desktop manager is the login manager of choice providing a separate
       login configuration for clients based on MAC address or host name.
       Themeing – KDM now supports GDM themes and can be used to provide an
       attractive login interface.
       Firefox/Iceweasel – in order for each client to have it's own instance of Firefox (or
       Debian's Iceweasel), each client must be logged in to a different account.
       Content filtering – use dansguardian and squid on or off the application server to
       provide content filtering. There is currently no simple solution for per client or per
       user filtering on LTSP.

12. Calculating Costs
LTSP systems can be expected to reduce costs drastically, whilst incurring a cost of
migration.

12.1 Long term costs
Areas where massive reductions in costs can be expected are:
       Staffing
       Hardware replacement
       Power consumption

12.2 Migration
Include the following in any calculation of migration costs:
       Training
       Hardware acquisition
          servers
          clients
       Conversions – converting old standalone desktops to thin clients
       Software re-implementation
       Data migration
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/SG246380/wwhelp/wwhimpl/js/html/wwhelp.htm
(migration help from IBM)

                                                                                                9
12.3 Legacy Software
It may be necessary to support legacy software - that which will only run on Windows or
any another operating system that is inherited.
Software packages to be given the most consideration are:
       Accounting applications – accountants are faced with limited support by way of
       accounting applications for Linux platforms.
       Design applications – designers put considerable time into learning a particular
       application and are unlikely to want to retrain to another in a hurry.
There are a number of way of providing support for legacy software:
       Maintain a legacy stand alone system – simply leaving one machine with the
       legacy operating system and application(s) on it can be a simple and effective
       solution for the smaller organisation.
       Use a Windows Linux solution – with programs like Wine, win4lin or Crossover
       Office, it's possible to run Windows applications from within a Linux platform.
       Popular applications are often targeted and made to work properly.
       Use a Windows terminal server - to provide access to applications. If the
       Windows terminal server system is run inside VMware, or another virtualisation
       system, then applications running inside the virtual Windows system can be load
       balanced against the Linux applications, making the best use of the available
       hardware.
Evaluate these approaches for your individual organisation using the following
considerations:
       Software costs
       Hardware costs
       Set-up costs
       Maintenance costs

13. Incremental Deployment
Identify the parts of your organisation most suited to migration and target those first.
Services ordered by decreasing ease of migration (from a Windows stand alone system to
LTSP) are:
       Web browsing
       wWord processing
       email clients
       Other office applications
       Graphic design applications
       Accounting systems
There may be considerable variation for your organisation. In a system where *nix is being
used already, there will be no need to move to compatible applications as existing
applications can be used.
Note that some web applications will only work with Internet Explorer.
                                                                                           10
Appendix A - Glossary
Distribution – A set of packages and a system for installing them. There are around 500
Linux distributions each with a different focus and use. Most of these are derivatives based
around larger distribution projects such as Debian or Fedora.
Local Applications – Applications in a thin client system usually run on the server but are
driven from the client. A local application is one that runs on the client itself. This is
appropriate where the clients are more powerful.
Thin Client – A computer system, usually of low power consumption, diskless and boots
from the network.
Single Threaded Application – An application that is run using just one process. Most
applications use this method. Alternative, multi-threaded applications, may become more
popular as multiple processor architectures like Intel's Core 2 Duo or AMD's X2 become
more common.




                                                                                              11
12
Appendix B - Example Costing Scenario

EXAMPLE VSO is an organisation that has 10 office workers:
   •   They have a server to share files and are supported by circuit riders and volunteers.
   •   They use a contacts database which runs on Microsoft Access and uses Microsoft
       Outlook for mail.
   •   They would like to replace their machines every 3 years, but usually can only afford
       one or two replacements each year.
   •   They replace this system with a new LTSP server and pay for a database migration
       that will run on it. They convert the old desktop machines to thin clients.
   •   They will also buy 2 custom thin clients a year, to slowly replace their re-purposed
       older machines with lower power solutions.
Within three years the costs look like this:

Ongoing Costs
(More details of this costing exercise can be found here:
http://www.openitup.org/moodle/mod/assignment/view.php?id=271)

…Old System
   per year
          Hardware costs
              2 standalone machines per year £800
          Software costs
              OS licenses £300 (2 machine licenses plus server license updates)
              Application licenses £200 (office software updates and anit-virus software)
          Staff
              Volunteer time is taken up helping with installs and troubleshooting
              40 hours call out fixing standalone machines, replacing hard drive, rescuing
              data and application troubleshooting £1600
          Power
              10x80W desktops £400
              1x200W server £100
                                                                                 Total £3300

…New System
   per year after 3 year conversion:
          Hardware costs
              One thin client per year £200
                                                                                            13
Software costs
              Free software throughout
          Staff
              Volunteers can configure new terminals
              10 hours server maintenance per year £400
          Power
              4x20W custom thin clients £40
              6x40W converted thin clients £120
              1x300W £150
                                                                                    Total £910


       ...and volunteers now have less time taken up maintaining the system with the new
       set up.

…and Migration Costs
          Training = 10 hours x £40 per hour = £400
          Hardware
              new server = £500
          Database re-write = £320
          Server install costs = £800
                                                                                  Total £2020

Summary
The current system cost is £3300 per year to maintain. The adopted system cost is £910
per year to maintain. The ratio of about 25-30% is typical for smaller organisations, and
decreases for an increase in organisation size, often ending up at 10% of the previous
costs.
The migration cost is £2020, bringing the total cost for the first year to £2930, which is less
than the old system cost to run in one year.




                                                                                             14

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Real Time Operating System
Real Time Operating SystemReal Time Operating System
Real Time Operating System
 
Rtos part2
Rtos part2Rtos part2
Rtos part2
 
RTOS
RTOSRTOS
RTOS
 
Applications of Distributed Systems
Applications of Distributed SystemsApplications of Distributed Systems
Applications of Distributed Systems
 
Os rtos.ppt
Os rtos.pptOs rtos.ppt
Os rtos.ppt
 
Real time operating system
Real time operating systemReal time operating system
Real time operating system
 
Advanced Operating System- Introduction
Advanced Operating System- IntroductionAdvanced Operating System- Introduction
Advanced Operating System- Introduction
 
Real-Time Operating Systems
Real-Time Operating SystemsReal-Time Operating Systems
Real-Time Operating Systems
 
Vxworks
VxworksVxworks
Vxworks
 
Real Time Operating System
Real Time Operating SystemReal Time Operating System
Real Time Operating System
 
Os unit 3 , process management
Os unit 3 , process managementOs unit 3 , process management
Os unit 3 , process management
 
Rtos ss
Rtos ssRtos ss
Rtos ss
 
Rtos Concepts
Rtos ConceptsRtos Concepts
Rtos Concepts
 
How to choose an RTOS?
How to choose an RTOS?How to choose an RTOS?
How to choose an RTOS?
 
OSCh14
OSCh14OSCh14
OSCh14
 
Cloud datacenters
Cloud datacentersCloud datacenters
Cloud datacenters
 
Real time operating system
Real time operating systemReal time operating system
Real time operating system
 
18 philbe replication stanford99
18 philbe replication stanford9918 philbe replication stanford99
18 philbe replication stanford99
 
RTOS implementation
RTOS implementationRTOS implementation
RTOS implementation
 
Rtos
RtosRtos
Rtos
 

Viewers also liked

Circuit Rider Training Project
Circuit Rider Training ProjectCircuit Rider Training Project
Circuit Rider Training Projectukriders
 
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Social tools in the cloud
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Social tools in the cloudLasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Social tools in the cloud
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Social tools in the cloudukriders
 
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Data protection and the cloud
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Data protection and the cloudLasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Data protection and the cloud
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Data protection and the cloudukriders
 
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Change for the better present...
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010  - Change for the better present...Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010  - Change for the better present...
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Change for the better present...ukriders
 
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Voice over IP presentation
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Voice over IP presentationLasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Voice over IP presentation
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Voice over IP presentationukriders
 
Salesforce - an introduction
Salesforce - an introductionSalesforce - an introduction
Salesforce - an introductionukriders
 
Virtualizzazione: soluzioni per Server e Client
Virtualizzazione: soluzioni per Server e ClientVirtualizzazione: soluzioni per Server e Client
Virtualizzazione: soluzioni per Server e ClientNicola Bressan
 
rdp remotefx spice arm-linux thin client
rdp remotefx spice arm-linux thin clientrdp remotefx spice arm-linux thin client
rdp remotefx spice arm-linux thin clientliwu.dong
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Circuit Rider Training Project
Circuit Rider Training ProjectCircuit Rider Training Project
Circuit Rider Training Project
 
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Social tools in the cloud
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Social tools in the cloudLasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Social tools in the cloud
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Social tools in the cloud
 
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Data protection and the cloud
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Data protection and the cloudLasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Data protection and the cloud
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Data protection and the cloud
 
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Change for the better present...
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010  - Change for the better present...Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010  - Change for the better present...
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Change for the better present...
 
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Voice over IP presentation
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Voice over IP presentationLasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Voice over IP presentation
Lasa European NFP Technology Conference 2010 - Voice over IP presentation
 
Salesforce - an introduction
Salesforce - an introductionSalesforce - an introduction
Salesforce - an introduction
 
Virtualizzazione: soluzioni per Server e Client
Virtualizzazione: soluzioni per Server e ClientVirtualizzazione: soluzioni per Server e Client
Virtualizzazione: soluzioni per Server e Client
 
rdp remotefx spice arm-linux thin client
rdp remotefx spice arm-linux thin clientrdp remotefx spice arm-linux thin client
rdp remotefx spice arm-linux thin client
 

Similar to 4029569 ltsp-practice-guide

Rha cluster suite wppdf
Rha cluster suite wppdfRha cluster suite wppdf
Rha cluster suite wppdfprojectmgmt456
 
Xd planning guide - storage best practices
Xd   planning guide - storage best practicesXd   planning guide - storage best practices
Xd planning guide - storage best practicesNuno Alves
 
Symmetric multiprocessing and Microkernel
Symmetric multiprocessing and MicrokernelSymmetric multiprocessing and Microkernel
Symmetric multiprocessing and MicrokernelManoraj Pannerselum
 
Basic concepts for_clustered_data_ontap_8.3_v1.1-lab_guide
Basic concepts for_clustered_data_ontap_8.3_v1.1-lab_guideBasic concepts for_clustered_data_ontap_8.3_v1.1-lab_guide
Basic concepts for_clustered_data_ontap_8.3_v1.1-lab_guideVikas Sharma
 
Hp serviceguard
Hp serviceguard Hp serviceguard
Hp serviceguard dkamalraj
 
Planning Optimal Lotus Quickr services for Portal (J2EE) Deployments
Planning Optimal Lotus Quickr services for Portal (J2EE) DeploymentsPlanning Optimal Lotus Quickr services for Portal (J2EE) Deployments
Planning Optimal Lotus Quickr services for Portal (J2EE) DeploymentsStuart McIntyre
 
Distributed Operating System
Distributed Operating SystemDistributed Operating System
Distributed Operating SystemAjithaG9
 
Unit 1_Operating system
Unit 1_Operating system Unit 1_Operating system
Unit 1_Operating system JayeshGadhave1
 
Four Ways to Improve Linux Performance IEEE Webinar, R2.0
Four Ways to Improve Linux Performance IEEE Webinar, R2.0Four Ways to Improve Linux Performance IEEE Webinar, R2.0
Four Ways to Improve Linux Performance IEEE Webinar, R2.0Michael Christofferson
 
Adaptive backup & Recovery partner enablement
Adaptive backup & Recovery partner enablementAdaptive backup & Recovery partner enablement
Adaptive backup & Recovery partner enablementJuan Niekerk
 
HPC Compass IBM Special 2013/14
HPC Compass IBM Special 2013/14HPC Compass IBM Special 2013/14
HPC Compass IBM Special 2013/14Marco van der Hart
 
HPC kompass ibm_special_2013/2014
HPC kompass ibm_special_2013/2014HPC kompass ibm_special_2013/2014
HPC kompass ibm_special_2013/2014TTEC
 
Ginsbourg.com - Performance and Load Test Report Template LTR 1.5
Ginsbourg.com - Performance and Load Test Report Template LTR 1.5Ginsbourg.com - Performance and Load Test Report Template LTR 1.5
Ginsbourg.com - Performance and Load Test Report Template LTR 1.5Shay Ginsbourg
 
Procesamiento multinúcleo óptimo para aplicaciones críticas de seguridad
 Procesamiento multinúcleo óptimo para aplicaciones críticas de seguridad Procesamiento multinúcleo óptimo para aplicaciones críticas de seguridad
Procesamiento multinúcleo óptimo para aplicaciones críticas de seguridadMarketing Donalba
 

Similar to 4029569 ltsp-practice-guide (20)

Rha cluster suite wppdf
Rha cluster suite wppdfRha cluster suite wppdf
Rha cluster suite wppdf
 
Xd planning guide - storage best practices
Xd   planning guide - storage best practicesXd   planning guide - storage best practices
Xd planning guide - storage best practices
 
Symmetric multiprocessing and Microkernel
Symmetric multiprocessing and MicrokernelSymmetric multiprocessing and Microkernel
Symmetric multiprocessing and Microkernel
 
Basic concepts for_clustered_data_ontap_8.3_v1.1-lab_guide
Basic concepts for_clustered_data_ontap_8.3_v1.1-lab_guideBasic concepts for_clustered_data_ontap_8.3_v1.1-lab_guide
Basic concepts for_clustered_data_ontap_8.3_v1.1-lab_guide
 
Embedded Linux
Embedded LinuxEmbedded Linux
Embedded Linux
 
Lesson 2
Lesson 2Lesson 2
Lesson 2
 
Hp serviceguard
Hp serviceguard Hp serviceguard
Hp serviceguard
 
Planning Optimal Lotus Quickr services for Portal (J2EE) Deployments
Planning Optimal Lotus Quickr services for Portal (J2EE) DeploymentsPlanning Optimal Lotus Quickr services for Portal (J2EE) Deployments
Planning Optimal Lotus Quickr services for Portal (J2EE) Deployments
 
Distributed Operating System
Distributed Operating SystemDistributed Operating System
Distributed Operating System
 
Unit 1_Operating system
Unit 1_Operating system Unit 1_Operating system
Unit 1_Operating system
 
Clustering overview2
Clustering overview2Clustering overview2
Clustering overview2
 
optimizing_ceph_flash
optimizing_ceph_flashoptimizing_ceph_flash
optimizing_ceph_flash
 
Four Ways to Improve Linux Performance IEEE Webinar, R2.0
Four Ways to Improve Linux Performance IEEE Webinar, R2.0Four Ways to Improve Linux Performance IEEE Webinar, R2.0
Four Ways to Improve Linux Performance IEEE Webinar, R2.0
 
Adaptive backup & Recovery partner enablement
Adaptive backup & Recovery partner enablementAdaptive backup & Recovery partner enablement
Adaptive backup & Recovery partner enablement
 
HPC Compass IBM Special 2013/14
HPC Compass IBM Special 2013/14HPC Compass IBM Special 2013/14
HPC Compass IBM Special 2013/14
 
HPC kompass ibm_special_2013/2014
HPC kompass ibm_special_2013/2014HPC kompass ibm_special_2013/2014
HPC kompass ibm_special_2013/2014
 
Ginsbourg.com - Performance and Load Test Report Template LTR 1.5
Ginsbourg.com - Performance and Load Test Report Template LTR 1.5Ginsbourg.com - Performance and Load Test Report Template LTR 1.5
Ginsbourg.com - Performance and Load Test Report Template LTR 1.5
 
Manual Sophos
Manual SophosManual Sophos
Manual Sophos
 
Linux basics
Linux basicsLinux basics
Linux basics
 
Procesamiento multinúcleo óptimo para aplicaciones críticas de seguridad
 Procesamiento multinúcleo óptimo para aplicaciones críticas de seguridad Procesamiento multinúcleo óptimo para aplicaciones críticas de seguridad
Procesamiento multinúcleo óptimo para aplicaciones críticas de seguridad
 

Recently uploaded

04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptxHampshireHUG
 
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...Igalia
 
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)wesley chun
 
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and MythsArtificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and MythsJoaquim Jorge
 
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slideHistor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slidevu2urc
 
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsHandwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsMaria Levchenko
 
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdflior mazor
 
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationGenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationMichael W. Hawkins
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonAnna Loughnan Colquhoun
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...apidays
 
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps ScriptAutomating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Scriptwesley chun
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processorsdebabhi2
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonetsnaman860154
 
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘RTylerCroy
 
EIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptx
EIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptxEIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptx
EIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptxEarley Information Science
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)Gabriella Davis
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationjfdjdjcjdnsjd
 
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of ServiceCNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Servicegiselly40
 
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfThe Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfEnterprise Knowledge
 

Recently uploaded (20)

04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
 
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
 
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
 
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and MythsArtificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
 
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slideHistor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
 
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsHandwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
 
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
 
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
 
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationGenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
 
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps ScriptAutomating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
 
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
 
EIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptx
EIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptxEIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptx
EIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptx
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
 
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of ServiceCNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
 
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfThe Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
 

4029569 ltsp-practice-guide

  • 1. Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP) Practice Guide
  • 2. 2
  • 3. Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP) Practice Guide Table of Contents Audience .....................................................................................................................4 Summary .....................................................................................................................4 1. Server Sizing ...........................................................................................................5 2. Client Level Quality of Service.................................................................................5 3. Choose your Distribution .........................................................................................6 3.1 Considerations ..............................................................................................6 3.2 Recommendations ........................................................................................6 4 Redundancy .............................................................................................................6 5. Clients .....................................................................................................................7 6. Security ...................................................................................................................7 7. Other Considerations ..............................................................................................8 8. Authentication..........................................................................................................8 9. Distributing Hardware Resources............................................................................8 10. Advocacy...............................................................................................................8 11. Guest Terminals ....................................................................................................9 12. Calculating Costs ..................................................................................................9 12.1 Long term costs ..........................................................................................9 12.2 Migration .....................................................................................................9 12.3 Legacy Software .......................................................................................10 13. Incremental Deployment......................................................................................10 Appendix A - Glossary...............................................................................................11 Appendix B - Example Costing Scenario...................................................................13 Ongoing Costs ......................................................................................................13 …Old System ........................................................................................................13 …New System ......................................................................................................13 …and Migration Costs...........................................................................................14 Summary...............................................................................................................14 Author Ben Green, ben@bristolwireless.net (April 2007) 3
  • 4. Audience This guide is aimed at a technically oriented audience. Summary Organisations that use Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP) to add thin-client support to Linux servers have speedier applications, easier application deployment, lower software cost and much lower administration cost. LTSP is a FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) project. LTSP (Linux Terminal Server Project) is a set of tools for allowing low specification computers to connect to a central server. Users of these remote computers may log in to the server and use applications there, or run applications locally on the client. LTSP is most easily applied to office systems. Shortcomings for other types of applications, such as sound programs, may be overcome by additional configuration, and by a number of new LTSP technologies like local device support. LTSP can reduce cost and power use in situations where there are as few as two concurrent users on one system. Advantages of LTSP over proprietary solutions include: Lower administration costs Lower hardware costs Lower power consumption Greater application speed It is a Free and Open Source solution Use LTSP wherever there are no reasons not to. Increased set up and maintenance difficulties arise when particular legacy applications need supporting. LTSP is not currently appropriate where very high performance multimedia tasks are being undertaken such as: Live music performance Video editing Migration costs may be the only factor limiting uptake. Deployment may be partial and also incremental. This document deals with issues of deployment including software and hardware choices, maintaining services, legacy applications and calculating total costs for a migration. 4
  • 5. 1. Server Sizing For system of less than 40 users a single dual cored server should be adequate, depending on the demands put upon it. Beyond that, some separation of services should be considered. On older Intel systems the cost of switching tasks between different processors in SMP systems was high, meaning bad performance under load and unresponsive applications. Avoid these architectures. Scale to your needs – remember to pitch your systems at the maximum number of terminals you will need. Designing a system that will scale to an appropriate size means you can add more capacity. Think about your applications load – qualify and quantify the particular applications people will be running and consider policies that limit users or workstations to specific applications. An appropriate desktop environment (DE)– for users with limited application use, a lower impact DE can cut down considerably on memory use. Those suitable for LTSP include XFCE4, JWM, ICEWM and Flux Box. Multi-processor systems are good – SMP systems ensure that no one user can dominate the computer's resources, and no additional configuration is necessary to achieve this. The maximum speed any single threaded application can run is that of the largest single processing unit; hence each individual processor needs to be fairly fast to maintain responsive applications. Work out your maximum memory constraints – things move very slowly when swap space is being used. Make sure you have enough main memory to run all your applications without swapping. This demands experience of application use in a multi-user environment. http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/ServerSizing http://virtualthreads.blogspot.com/2006/02/understanding-memory-usage-on- linux.html (how to properly measure memory use on Linux) 2. Client Level Quality of Service No hoggers – A robust LTSP system must ensure that no one can hog the application server's computer resources. A variety of Unix tools can be used to achieve this including: Network traffic shaping on the internal network per client Process limits per user File system quotas per user No problem on small systems – The Linux kernel usually does a good job by itself, balancing demanding processes and clearing memory of used code. Dead processes may build up. Use disk swap to provide an area where these processes can reside outside of main memory. http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/LinuxTutorialQuotas.html (filesystem quotaing) http://gentoo-wiki.com/SECURITY_Limit_User_Processes (process limits) 5
  • 6. 3. Choose your Distribution 3.1 Considerations Software available – whatever software is available to the server will also be available to the clients. Choose an operating system that has the software you want your users to be able to use, or one that you are comfortable customizing applications for. Support – if you need external software support for your server systems, choose a distribution with a support structure you like. LTSP integration – LTSP-5.0 is integrated into distributions, rather than being a separate install. This system has the best support for local applications and uses the distribution's own package management system to build the client image. If you wish to use local applications, use a distribution supporting LTSP-5.0 http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/Ltsp5Status (status of LTSP-5 integration) 3.2 Recommendations Debian is at the time of writing the only distribution with a record of high security and stability that contains a wide range of packages. The package count for the next stable release is getting on for 20,000. This wealth of software includes most good stable and actively maintained open source releases. For a flexible, sustainable and completely free solution for LTSP, Debian is highly recommended. LTSP-5.0 support is also good in Debian - and LTSP-4.2 works very well too. An often cited disadvantage of Debian is that the stable releases are outdated at release because of their long release cycle - the incredible pace of Linux development means that users can miss out on innovations for some time. Issues of hardware support are not prevalent in LTSP environments. For an off the peg educational solution, K12LTSP is also recommended. Note however that an easy installation does not necessarily mean an easily upgradable long term solution. The Debian project with similar aims to K12LTSP is DebianEdu. There is an associated live CD project called SkoleLinux. http://debian.org http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu (and the English language Skolelinux page) http://k12ltsp.org 4 Redundancy Managing data and service redundancy are both relatively easy in a thin client system because data is located on few servers, or often just the one. Research appropriate strategies after ascertaining your user requirements. Split application servers – In a large LTSP system applications can be split between a number of servers. For example, each client may connect to a different application server based upon which server is least loaded. Home directories may be shared via a distributed file system. Keep backups – data redundancy for users is essential. Back up the system and 6
  • 7. home directories via mirroring or a RAID set up. TFTP, DHCP, NFS, X – these are LTSP's essential services. The server(s) providing X and NFS will also be serving the applications. Separating the other two services is possible. http://republico.estv.ipv.pt/~nmct/ltsp/ha/ (high availability through 2 application servers) http://www1.uni-hamburg.de/RRZ/W.Buech/LTC-linux-kongress.pdf (another method of application load balancing through clusters). http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9097 (splitting all the LTSP services out as much as possible) 5. Clients Higher transistor densities mean computing systems use less power. Thin clients don't need much processing power unless local applications are being used. High speed graphical interfaces are more crucial to user interactiveness than high processing speed. The newer the technology a thin client uses, the lower the power. Recent systems based on the SiS SoC (system on a chip) have produced clients with excellent graphical capabilities and typical power usage of 5W. This figure is likely to become more common place, though around 20W is more typical for a thin client in the current market. For re-purposed desktop machine power usage will probably at least 40W. Use low power – with increasing power costs the sustainability of computer systems depends increasingly on their power consumption performance. Clients are available that run on as little as 5W each, and 15” monitors at 14W. Research and test in use before buying. Check power requirements if you are re-using old hardware – LTSP systems using old desktops converted to LTSP can reduce power consumption hugely over standalone systems. Remove hard drives and other unused peripherals to save the most power. Consider underclocking and fan removal to further reduce power use. Research and test power use. Convert clients using PXE Ethernet cards – second hand PXE based cards are a very cheap way to get thin clients booting, requiring only that they have a PCI slot. 6. Security Separated networks – application data passes over LTSP networks unencrypted. Separation of open and thin client networks reduces the chance of intrusion. Physically secure the network – protect users from compromising person/ personal data by ensuring the LTSP segment is not accessible to other users. Local Data Manager (LDM) – open networks might be vulnerable to snooping, use the LDM login manager to provide a secure session over SSH. Remote shut-down – clients can be shut down remotely using the ltspadmin command, saving time and energy and allowing a quick response in the event of a security compromise. Client monitoring – you can monitor clients by running a VNC server on each of them. Turn off diagnostics – some diagnostic features of LTSP have security issues. 7
  • 8. Make sure they are turned off in a production system. http://www.geocities.com/hammerjw/ltsp-basic_security.html (basic guide to LTSP security) http://www.k12ltsp.org/mediawiki/index.php/Using_VNC_to_shadow_clients (monitoring client desktops) 7. Other Considerations Sound support for limited applications – due to the lack of a common network transparent sound API for Linux, remote sound needs to be set up on a per application basis. Latency is a problem. Use local applications to run sound applications locally. Don't expect to edit video via LTSP. For music software local applications may be used. Local storage devices – current LTSP implementation means that reading local media is easy. Writing local USB keys and floppy disks is also simple. Encourage temporary account users to write data to USB keys rather than to their local account. WEEE directives - the WEEE directive means that disposing of unused hardware is becoming more expensive. This should be taken into consideration when costing LTSP solutions against 'buy new' alternatives: LTSP often facilitates effective reuse of old equipment. 8. Authentication Central Authentication – consider LDAP for medium to large organisations as a way to consolidate user data across a range of applications and services, including LTSP. http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/LDAP 9. Distributing Hardware Resources Local applications – in LTSP-5.0 it's easy to run applications on the clients rather than the server. Use this feature to reduce the processor load on the server, make sound applications very easy to configure, and video applications work with better A/V synchronisation. Swap – give clients with limited RAM a swap cache on the server using NBD. This is a standard LTSP feature. 10. Advocacy The following are the main selling points of LTSP: It feels like you are on the mainframe – applications load and run on the fastest machine in your network. Low cost – lower hardware costs, reuse of old equipment. Low power – power consumption reductions of 50% and beyond. Low maintenance – maintenance hours are lower than 10% of those for standalone systems. 8
  • 9. No software costs – free software may be used for no monetary cost. Lower migration costs – the cost of moving to an LTSP system from a Windows system is lower than moving from a Windows system to a standalone system. http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/SuccessStories 11. Guest Terminals Along with normal users, some terminals on your system may need to log in automatically and provide limited functionality. In an internet café or public access suite, this might be the only type of access to be allowed. Make the following considerations: KDM – the K desktop manager is the login manager of choice providing a separate login configuration for clients based on MAC address or host name. Themeing – KDM now supports GDM themes and can be used to provide an attractive login interface. Firefox/Iceweasel – in order for each client to have it's own instance of Firefox (or Debian's Iceweasel), each client must be logged in to a different account. Content filtering – use dansguardian and squid on or off the application server to provide content filtering. There is currently no simple solution for per client or per user filtering on LTSP. 12. Calculating Costs LTSP systems can be expected to reduce costs drastically, whilst incurring a cost of migration. 12.1 Long term costs Areas where massive reductions in costs can be expected are: Staffing Hardware replacement Power consumption 12.2 Migration Include the following in any calculation of migration costs: Training Hardware acquisition servers clients Conversions – converting old standalone desktops to thin clients Software re-implementation Data migration http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/SG246380/wwhelp/wwhimpl/js/html/wwhelp.htm (migration help from IBM) 9
  • 10. 12.3 Legacy Software It may be necessary to support legacy software - that which will only run on Windows or any another operating system that is inherited. Software packages to be given the most consideration are: Accounting applications – accountants are faced with limited support by way of accounting applications for Linux platforms. Design applications – designers put considerable time into learning a particular application and are unlikely to want to retrain to another in a hurry. There are a number of way of providing support for legacy software: Maintain a legacy stand alone system – simply leaving one machine with the legacy operating system and application(s) on it can be a simple and effective solution for the smaller organisation. Use a Windows Linux solution – with programs like Wine, win4lin or Crossover Office, it's possible to run Windows applications from within a Linux platform. Popular applications are often targeted and made to work properly. Use a Windows terminal server - to provide access to applications. If the Windows terminal server system is run inside VMware, or another virtualisation system, then applications running inside the virtual Windows system can be load balanced against the Linux applications, making the best use of the available hardware. Evaluate these approaches for your individual organisation using the following considerations: Software costs Hardware costs Set-up costs Maintenance costs 13. Incremental Deployment Identify the parts of your organisation most suited to migration and target those first. Services ordered by decreasing ease of migration (from a Windows stand alone system to LTSP) are: Web browsing wWord processing email clients Other office applications Graphic design applications Accounting systems There may be considerable variation for your organisation. In a system where *nix is being used already, there will be no need to move to compatible applications as existing applications can be used. Note that some web applications will only work with Internet Explorer. 10
  • 11. Appendix A - Glossary Distribution – A set of packages and a system for installing them. There are around 500 Linux distributions each with a different focus and use. Most of these are derivatives based around larger distribution projects such as Debian or Fedora. Local Applications – Applications in a thin client system usually run on the server but are driven from the client. A local application is one that runs on the client itself. This is appropriate where the clients are more powerful. Thin Client – A computer system, usually of low power consumption, diskless and boots from the network. Single Threaded Application – An application that is run using just one process. Most applications use this method. Alternative, multi-threaded applications, may become more popular as multiple processor architectures like Intel's Core 2 Duo or AMD's X2 become more common. 11
  • 12. 12
  • 13. Appendix B - Example Costing Scenario EXAMPLE VSO is an organisation that has 10 office workers: • They have a server to share files and are supported by circuit riders and volunteers. • They use a contacts database which runs on Microsoft Access and uses Microsoft Outlook for mail. • They would like to replace their machines every 3 years, but usually can only afford one or two replacements each year. • They replace this system with a new LTSP server and pay for a database migration that will run on it. They convert the old desktop machines to thin clients. • They will also buy 2 custom thin clients a year, to slowly replace their re-purposed older machines with lower power solutions. Within three years the costs look like this: Ongoing Costs (More details of this costing exercise can be found here: http://www.openitup.org/moodle/mod/assignment/view.php?id=271) …Old System per year Hardware costs 2 standalone machines per year £800 Software costs OS licenses £300 (2 machine licenses plus server license updates) Application licenses £200 (office software updates and anit-virus software) Staff Volunteer time is taken up helping with installs and troubleshooting 40 hours call out fixing standalone machines, replacing hard drive, rescuing data and application troubleshooting £1600 Power 10x80W desktops £400 1x200W server £100 Total £3300 …New System per year after 3 year conversion: Hardware costs One thin client per year £200 13
  • 14. Software costs Free software throughout Staff Volunteers can configure new terminals 10 hours server maintenance per year £400 Power 4x20W custom thin clients £40 6x40W converted thin clients £120 1x300W £150 Total £910 ...and volunteers now have less time taken up maintaining the system with the new set up. …and Migration Costs Training = 10 hours x £40 per hour = £400 Hardware new server = £500 Database re-write = £320 Server install costs = £800 Total £2020 Summary The current system cost is £3300 per year to maintain. The adopted system cost is £910 per year to maintain. The ratio of about 25-30% is typical for smaller organisations, and decreases for an increase in organisation size, often ending up at 10% of the previous costs. The migration cost is £2020, bringing the total cost for the first year to £2930, which is less than the old system cost to run in one year. 14