SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 51
Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit
Oslo, January 2015
2
PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING – ENERGY
 Europe’s leading specialist energy
management consultancy
 Offering expert advice from strategy to
implementation on policy, regulation,
business operations, financing and
valuation and sustainability
 Providing in-depth market analysis and
strategic insight across Europe
 Over 200 energy market experts
in 12 offices across Europe:
 Düsseldorf
 Helsinki
 London
 Milan
 Moscow
 Oslo
 Oxford
 Paris
 Vienna
 Villach
 Zurich
 Madrid
3
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
…from board room to trading desk and back
4
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
You do not want last resort Auditors to take lead:
Enterprise Risk Management needs to be forward looking and proactive –
are you ready for the future?
5
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
What’s up?
 Expected cost:
 EU regulations and the transition towards Internal Energy Market
(IEM).
 Tougher regulation sanctions (unlimited?).
 Change of market design and capacity markets
 More mandatory reporting.
 Expected revenue:
 Current market prices are down
 Future market prices are down
 Will we ever see nominal 2008 levels again?
 Expected P&L
 Does expected P&L, return and dividend reflect changes in revenue
and cost?
 Does asset valuation reflect market values?
 Should stable dividend expectations be solved by increasing risk?
Enterprise Risk Management needs to be forward looking and proactive –
are you ready for the future?
Energy Act EU regulation
6
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
 Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit is a
structured way to diagnose current status, identify
need for change, redesign and implement ERM
improvements.
 Supplementary examples:
 Enterprise Risk Management - Frameworks
Frameworks are nothing but frameworks they all need
tailormade implementation. Putting it all togheter depends on
KPI & KRI library quality and several other factors.
 Enterprise Risk Management - Compliance
Point of no return is reached. Transition from Energy Act to
EU regulation will be a gamechanger. We are moving from
intention based frameworks to detailed regulations.
 Enterprise Risk Management - Tailor made
implementation
Several issues to look at depending on company. Provided
examples are meant as ideas for scoping with clients.
Todays agenda:
7
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
Enterprise Risk Management Goals & Process:
Enterprise Risk Management goals:
 Understanding the shock resistance of the
enterprise to its key risks
 Managing enterprise risk exposure to the level
desired by senior management.
Enterprise Risk Management process:
 Coordinating Risk Management Objectives and
Components
 Focusing on cooperation among departments to
manage the organization’s full range of risks as a
whole.
 Creating a framework for effectively managing
uncertainty, responding to risk and harnessing
opportunities as they arise.
 Embodying the notion that risk analysis cuts across
the entire organization.
RM Objectives
RiskComponents
8
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
What is it, why do you need it and the alternative approach
What: Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit is a structured way to diagnose current
status, identify need for change, redesign and implement ERM improvements:
 Based on real world experience from trading & hedging environments combined with decades of
fundamental analysis and studies.
 Voluntary, Confidential and Objective
Why: Enterprise Risk Management is vulnerable to implementation and often fail to deliver:
 Consistency and coherency are crucial in all aspects of implementation. Lack of standardization,
communication, coordination, cooperation and understanding are devastating.
 Need for tailor made implementation combined with strong dependency on individuals
 Internal audits cannot be neutral and objective
 Mandatory external audits are ex-post focused (based on accounting & tax legislations)
 Solutions that are not soundly based could contribute to unforeseen consequences and increased risk
Alternative: External audits and an objective second opinion are a far more convenient
way of improving ERM quality than learning the hard way from own mistakes
Diagnostic Redesign Implementation
9
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGMENT AUDIT
 Evaluating G’SOT:
 Goal
 Strategy
 Objectives
 Tactics
 With focus on:
 ERM Framework
 Strategic RM
 Compliance RM
 Reputational RM
 Financial RM
 Operational RM
 Using:
 KPI, KRI and KCI
 Evaluation:
 Gap analysis
 Improvement Proposal
Voluntary, Confidential and Objective audit with intention of improvement
1. KPI: Key Performance Indicators, KRI: Key Risk Indicators, KCI: Key Control Indicators
10
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGMENT AUDIT
 Evaluating G’SOT:
 Goal
 Strategy
 Objectives
 Tactics
 With focus on:
 ERM Framework
 Strategic RM
 Compliance RM
 Reputational RM
 Financial RM
 Operational RM
 Using:
 KPI, KRI and KCI
 Evaluation:
 Gap analysis
 Improvement Proposal
Voluntary, Confidential and Objective audit with intention of improvement
1. KPI: Key Performance Indicators, KRI: Key Risk Indicators, KCI: Key Control Indicators
11COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
11PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING
Where do we start?
Data collection:
• Why are we in business:
• G’SOT (Goals, Strategy,
Objectives and Tactics)
• Evaluation of G’SOT consistency &
coherency with ERM Framework
• Strategic-, Compliance-,
Reputational-, Financial-,
Operational RM
• KPI, KRI and KCI Library
Phase 1 - Identification Phase 2 - Capture
Diagnostic Redesign Implementation
Based on:
Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management
Audit Diagnostic Report
• Proposal for RM redesign
DescriptionResult
Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management
Audit Diagnostic Report:
• GAP quantification
• Identification of improvement
Based on:
Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management
Audit Redesign Proposal
• Significant on-site presence
• Implementation of new
management processes and
information tools
• Coaching and training of staff at all
levels to utilize improvements
• Capture of improved KPI, KRI and
KCI results
Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management
Audit Redesign Proposal:
• Presentation of the proposal
• Red flag report, identification of
implementation challenges.
• Define solutions to overcome
technical barriers
Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management
Audit Implementation Report:
• Identification of improvement
• Identification of objectives for follow
up
12COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
12PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING
Details on Phase 1
Phase 1 - Identification
Diagnostic
DescriptionResult
Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management
Audit Diagnostic Report:
• GAP quantification
• Identification of improvement
 Approach, context and scope of the Audit
• Identify an appropriate suite of focus areas
• Project work streams details
• Project timeline
• Budget
 What we need from you:
• Quantitative & qualitative description of G’SOT
• ERM Framework, e.g.:
• Organisation map and risk owner hirarchy
• Risk policy & operational risk limits
• Portfolio structure
• KPI, KRI and KCI Library
 Deliverables
• Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit Report:
 Pöyry project team:
• Heine Rønningen
• Michel Martin
• Cathrine Torvestad
Data collection:
• Why are we in business:
• G’SOT (Goals, Strategy,
Objectives and Tactics)
• Evaluation of G’SOT consistency &
coherency with ERM Framework
• Strategic-, Compliance-,
Reputational-, Financial-,
Operational RM
• KPI, KRI & KCI Library
13
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
 Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit is a
structured way to diagnose current status, identify
need for change, redesign and implement ERM
improvements.
 Supplementary examples:
 Enterprise Risk Management - Frameworks
Frameworks are nothing but frameworks they all need
tailormade implementation. Putting it all togheter depends on
KPI & KRI library quality and several other factors.
 Enterprise Risk Management - Compliance
Point of no return is reached. Transition from Energy Act to
EU regulation will be a gamechanger. We are moving from
intention based frameworks to detailed regulations.
 Enterprise Risk Management - Tailor made
implementation
Several issues to look at depending on company. Provided
examples are meant as ideas for scoping with clients.
Todays agenda:
14
ENTERPRICE RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS
 ERM Qualitity is dependent on
implementation rather than the choice of
policy framework school.
 ERM Policy based on:
• COSO ERM:
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission www.coso.org
• RM effect on objectives
• RM as a compliance based function
• ISO 31000:
International Organization for Standardization www.iso.org
• R/RM as an event or process
• RM as a strategic discipline for making risk-adjusted
decisions
• COSO/ISO Hybrid or other solutions
Enterprice Risk Management (ERM) Policy: Different methodologies, same
objective and challanges
15
RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS
• RM Quality is dependent on
implementation. No closed form
solution/equation
• RM Policy based on:
• @ Risk methodology:
• Value at Risk (VaR)
• Cash flow at Risk (CFaR)
• Profit at Risk (PaR)
• X at Risk (XaR)
• Other methods:
• Function of probability and
expected value
• All based on:
• Predefined distributions
• Empirical values
• Monte Carlo simulation
• Market values
• Mean reversion
• External boundaries
• Assumptions
Strategic, Compliance, Reputational, Financial, Operational RM Policy:
Different methodologies, same objective and challenges
16
RISK MANAGEMENT CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCY
Missing link between RM components can be
devastating in reaching the objectives.
Consistent: the quality of behaving the same way
over time (input, methodology, output).
Coherent: the quality of being logically connected
(organization levels, business units..).
Consistency and coherency are of outmost importance in all aspects of
the business
17
RISK MANAGEMENT CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCY
 Expected EBITDA
 Dividend Capacity
 CAPEX budget
Financial RM Link Operational RM
 Risk owners
 Exposure limits
 Stop loss rules
 HedgingRehedging strategy
 A common base for:
 Input
 Calculation methods
 Output
18
RISK MANAGEMENT CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCY
Specific: Explicit description of
what we are measuring
Measureable: Absolute or
relative benchmark values
Achievable: Far fetched goals
are discouraging
Relevant: Coherent with
objectives and Consistent
over time
Time-bound: time dimension
and granularity must be
explicit
Are the indicators SMART
19
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
 Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit is a
structured way to diagnose current status, identify
need for change, redesign and implement ERM
improvements.
 Supplementary examples:
 Enterprise Risk Management - Frameworks
Frameworks are nothing but frameworks they all need
tailormade implementation. Putting it all togheter depends on
KPI & KRI library quality and several other factors.
 Enterprise Risk Management - Compliance
Point of no return is reached. Transition from Energy Act to
EU regulation will be a gamechanger. We are moving from
intention based frameworks to detailed regulations.
 Enterprise Risk Management - Tailor made
implementation
Several issues to look at depending on company. Provided
examples are meant as ideas for scoping with clients.
Todays agenda:
20
RISK MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
Both external & internal compliance are important
• External:
• Regulations
– Increasing regulatory risk in a rapid
changing regulation regime.
– MAD & REMIT are at the top of regulators
agenda.
• Internal:
• Business Culture: Googles definition of Knaves
«Knaves "lie, cheat, steal, and take credit for
other people's work"»
ACER and NRA users of Nasdaq OMX
Smarts
21
 Regulations
• EU 713/2009 ACERs role
• EU 714/2009 X-Border (NC CACM, NC FCA...)
• EU 543/2013 Transparency
• EU 1227/2011 (REMIT) Commodity Market abuse &
Insider trading
• Directive 2004/39/EC (MiFID)
• EU 1287/2006 (MiFID IA)
• EU 648/2012 (EMIR) Central Clearing Party
• EU 596/2014 (MAD) Derivatives Market abuse &
Insider trading
 Compliance Risk:
• Reputational
• Sanctions
• Worst case: unlimited based on harm
RISK MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
Regulations
22
Derivative regulations
MiFID: Investor protection, MP
classification (fin, non fin +/-)
Contract definition and exemptions
EMIR: Central Counterparties (CCP)
Contract definition from MiFID
MAD: Market abuse & inside trading
Contract definition from MiFID
REMIT: Market abuse & inside trading
Own contract definition, Transparency data
= inside information (certain criteria)
Transparency regulation:
Mandatory disclosure of data.
Definition of data and data owner.
MAD and REMIT => Complimentary regulation with the same intention =>
Prohibition of market abuse and inside trading
Commodity regulations
Cross border: EC 714/2009
NC EB: Electricity Balancing
NC CACM: Capacity & Congestion
NC FCA: FWD Capacity
23
Derivative regulations
MiFID: Investor protection, MP
classification (fin, non fin +/-)
Contract definition and exemptions
Commodity regulations
Exemption
- Must be physically settled
- Traded on OTF not RM
- Regulated by REMIT
Nordic design European design
European market design exemption from derivatives?
Nordic market design «cannot escape».
24
Derivative regulations
MiFID: Investor protection, MP
classification (fin, non fin +/-)
Contract definition and exemptions
Commodity regulations
Bilateral leakage
- Must be physically settled
- Traded on OTF not RM
- Regulated by REMIT
Nordic design European design
• Increased cost under EMIR could possible increase bilateral trading.
• Nordic market design «cannot escape».
• Physical EFET FEMA with operational netting may be exempted
• If Transition to physical => Financial capital may pull out (inc. cost, complexity)
25
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
 Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit is a
structured way to diagnose current status, identify
need for change, redesign and implement ERM
improvements.
 Supplementary examples:
 Enterprise Risk Management - Frameworks
Frameworks are nothing but frameworks they all need
tailormade implementation. Putting it all togheter depends on
KPI & KRI library quality and several other factors.
 Enterprise Risk Management - Compliance
Point of no return is reached. Transition from Energy Act to
EU regulation will be a gamechanger. We are moving from
intention based frameworks to detailed regulations.
 Enterprise Risk Management - Tailor made
implementation
Several issues to look at depending on company. Provided
examples are meant as ideas for scoping with clients.
Todays agenda:
26
RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION
Risk Management : A process of continuous improvement.
 Risk Management is not
a one shot exercise
 Ajustment of objectives
 Continuous Risk
Assesment
• Identify
• Analyse
• Evaluate
 Risk treatment
• Create/adjust control
enviroment
• Control the activities
• Inform/Communicate
• Monitor
 Start over....
27
RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION
Risk management function positioning
 Risk committee
 Chief Risk Officer (CRO)
 Both
 Keys to success
 CRO peer with business line leaders
 CRO reporting line to the board (or Risk
Committee)
 CRO has a broader risk focus than compliance
 CRO position and interaction with senior
management clearly defined
 Managing risk is everyone’s job
 Management values RM as an equal discipline to
opportunities pursuit
28
RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION
KPI & KRI: Assumptions, benchmarking and backtesting performance
 Performance evaluation & Hurdle rates:
 CAPM «nice tool» for companies quoted on an
exchange with relevant peers.
 Most companies are not quoted on an exchange
 What is your Market Cap, Beta or Small Cap premium?
 Other evaluation methods based on risk adjusted
performance:
 RORAC: Return On Risk Adjusted Capital
 RAROC: Risk Adjusted Return On Capital
 RARORAC: Risk Adjusted Return On Risk Adjusted
Capital
 Sharp Ratio: Actual return – Risk free rate / Volatility
 V2 Ratio – Actual return vs. Benchmark return
 Bonus programs & performance based incentives
 Relation to KPI & KRI
 Size, Downside risk, Watermark
29
RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION
 Must be sound based in corporate G’SOT
 Example:
 KPI = max (Actual Price/DA Price)
 Does not say anything about the potential or the
risk:
 Bearish scenario:
 No hedge: KPI = 1, highest risk, 100% lost potential
 Hedge A: KPI = 1.8, lowest risk, 20% lost potential
 Hedge B: KPI = 1.2, high risk, 80% lost potential
 Bullish scenario
 No hedge: KPI = 1, highest risk, 0% lost potential
 Hedge A: KPI = 0.6, lowest risk, 80% lost potential
 Hedge B: KPI = 0.9, high risk, 20% lost potential
 Hedging close to delivery gives higher probability
of maximizing KPI at the price of a higher risk:
 A good strategy for a lazy trader with P&L incentives
only?
 Perhaps not that good for the company?
KPI & KRI selection
30
RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION
 Standardized process
 Tailormade content
 A non-summative drill down
exercise
 Define risk apetite:
 Reward risk mitigation on some
risks?
 Reward risk adjusted P&L on
some risks?
KPI & KRI Selection and calibration based on G’SOT & Risk Assessment
𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒, 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤, 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑜𝑖𝑟 + +
𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 = 𝑓 ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑟𝑚𝑐, 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 + +
𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 = 𝑓 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒, 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑠𝑛𝑜𝑤 + +
31
RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION
KPI & KRI: Risk owner & portfolio framework
 Creating an efficient library
of KPI & KRI is highly
dependent on portfolio
structure
 Separation of Preformance
& Risk related to key
elements crucial:
 Forecast
 Inflow
 Constraints
 Regulations
 Basis
 Profile
 Bidding Zone
 Market
 Xtra
 Static
 Dynamic
32
RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION
KPI & KRI: Risk owner & portfolio framework
 Efficient portfolio structure
makes it easier to adjust risk
according to objectives
using KPI & KRI triggers
33
RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION
KPI & KRI: Assumptions, benchmarking and backtesting market input
34
 Standardized & Cleared:
 ..or Bilateral OTC
 Counterparty Credit Risk
 Based on Basel II/III
– A-IRB
– IRB
– Standard
 Internal models
RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION
Counterparty Credit Risk: Bilateral OTC vs. Central Counterparties
35
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGMENT AUDIT
 ERM Quality is dependent on
implementation rather than the choice of
policy framework school.
 RM Quality is dependent on
implementation. No closed form
solution/equation
 Missing link between RM components
can be devastating in reaching the
objectives.
 External Compliance Risk worst case:
unlimited based on harm
 ERM is dependent on implementation.
There are no closed form solutions.
Mistakes can be devastating in reaching
the objectives. Consequences could
worst case be unlimited.
ERM Presentation red ink summary:
 External mandatory audit is based on
accounting legislation – vague on risk
management.
 Use Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management
Audit to fill the gap.
36
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
…most black swans are white. Controlling your risks gives you
confidence within the confidence interval.
Contacts:
Heine Rønningen
Email: heine.ronningen@poyry.com
Telefon: +47 90 60 87 74
Michel Martin
Email: michel.martin@poyry.com
Telefon: +47 xxxxxxxx
Cathrine Torvestad
Email: cathrine.torvestad@poyry.com
Telefon: +47 xxxxxxxx
38
PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT
Putting it all togheter...
RM:
Strategic
Compliance
Reputational
Financial
Operational
Mission & Vision
_Goals
__ Strategies
___Objectives
____Tactics
39
KPI = MAX (ACTUAL PRICE/DA PRICE)
Bearish scenario:
40
KPI = MAX (ACTUAL PRICE/DA PRICE)
Bullish scenario:
41
RISK ASSESSMENT
 When in doubt.....
• Decompose
• Identify, analyse, evaluate
• Adjust for covariance
• Aggregate
Identify, Analyse, Evaluate
42
(P) Hedged
Item:
Forecast
(T) Tax:
= 31% of P
(S) Spot:
= x% of P-T
(H) Hedge
Total:
= P - T – S
(Hstd) Hedge Total Standard
= (H) MWh mapped to
standard hedging instruments
(Hx) Hedge
Xtra:
= max (Hstd)
(Hs) Hedge
Static:
= Hstd - Hx
(Hd) Hedge Dynamic:
= Hstd - Hs
RISK OWNER & PORTFOLIO FRAMWORK
Value@Risk focus
CashFlow@Risk focus
43
RISK OWNER & PORTFOLIO FRAMWORK
(P) Hedged item
Empirical analysis & forecasts
44
RISK OWNER & PORTFOLIO FRAMWORK
(S) Spot
A natural hedge if price and generation are negatively correlated
45
RISK OWNER & PORTFOLIO FRAMWORK
(Hs) Hedge static
Static programs could work both for actual hedging and benchmark
46
RISK OWNER & PORTFOLIO FRAMWORK
(Hd) Hedge dynamic
Close to trading activity, stronger demand for KPI & KRI
47
HEDGED ITEM VS. HEDGING INSTRUMENT, HEDGING COST
48
NORMAL DISTRIBUTED PRICE CHANGE VS. ACTUAL
49
VOLATILITY MARKET VS. OWN
50
VALUE AT RISK OUTLIERS
51
BASEL II/III
IRB

More Related Content

What's hot

Enterprise risk management february 9th solution training
Enterprise risk management february 9th   solution trainingEnterprise risk management february 9th   solution training
Enterprise risk management february 9th solution trainingveritama
 
200506_The Business Link How to succeed in Outsourcing international operations
200506_The Business Link How to succeed in Outsourcing international operations200506_The Business Link How to succeed in Outsourcing international operations
200506_The Business Link How to succeed in Outsourcing international operationsJean-Claude DE VERA
 
Technology Strategy for Impact
Technology Strategy for ImpactTechnology Strategy for Impact
Technology Strategy for ImpactDonny Shimamoto
 
Integrating Strategy and Risk Management
Integrating Strategy and Risk ManagementIntegrating Strategy and Risk Management
Integrating Strategy and Risk ManagementAndrew Smart
 
GRI ERM Roadmap - Program Overview
GRI ERM Roadmap - Program OverviewGRI ERM Roadmap - Program Overview
GRI ERM Roadmap - Program OverviewDenise Robinson
 
Operational risk management (2)
Operational risk management (2)Operational risk management (2)
Operational risk management (2)Ujjwal 'Shanu'
 
Operational Risk function in 1st line
Operational Risk function in 1st lineOperational Risk function in 1st line
Operational Risk function in 1st lineLászló Árvai
 
Operational risk management and measurement
Operational risk management and measurementOperational risk management and measurement
Operational risk management and measurementRahmat Mulyana
 
ERM and Internal Auditing 2016 Tea Talk v2a
ERM and Internal Auditing 2016 Tea Talk v2aERM and Internal Auditing 2016 Tea Talk v2a
ERM and Internal Auditing 2016 Tea Talk v2aNusaibah Hamizan
 
dt_mt_SREP_Pub_BCBS239_200216lo
dt_mt_SREP_Pub_BCBS239_200216lodt_mt_SREP_Pub_BCBS239_200216lo
dt_mt_SREP_Pub_BCBS239_200216loMark Micallef
 

What's hot (11)

Enterprise risk management february 9th solution training
Enterprise risk management february 9th   solution trainingEnterprise risk management february 9th   solution training
Enterprise risk management february 9th solution training
 
200506_The Business Link How to succeed in Outsourcing international operations
200506_The Business Link How to succeed in Outsourcing international operations200506_The Business Link How to succeed in Outsourcing international operations
200506_The Business Link How to succeed in Outsourcing international operations
 
Technology Strategy for Impact
Technology Strategy for ImpactTechnology Strategy for Impact
Technology Strategy for Impact
 
Integrating Strategy and Risk Management
Integrating Strategy and Risk ManagementIntegrating Strategy and Risk Management
Integrating Strategy and Risk Management
 
GRI ERM Roadmap - Program Overview
GRI ERM Roadmap - Program OverviewGRI ERM Roadmap - Program Overview
GRI ERM Roadmap - Program Overview
 
Operational risk management (2)
Operational risk management (2)Operational risk management (2)
Operational risk management (2)
 
People risk collateral 2013
People risk collateral 2013People risk collateral 2013
People risk collateral 2013
 
Operational Risk function in 1st line
Operational Risk function in 1st lineOperational Risk function in 1st line
Operational Risk function in 1st line
 
Operational risk management and measurement
Operational risk management and measurementOperational risk management and measurement
Operational risk management and measurement
 
ERM and Internal Auditing 2016 Tea Talk v2a
ERM and Internal Auditing 2016 Tea Talk v2aERM and Internal Auditing 2016 Tea Talk v2a
ERM and Internal Auditing 2016 Tea Talk v2a
 
dt_mt_SREP_Pub_BCBS239_200216lo
dt_mt_SREP_Pub_BCBS239_200216lodt_mt_SREP_Pub_BCBS239_200216lo
dt_mt_SREP_Pub_BCBS239_200216lo
 

Similar to Poyry Risk Management Audit ver 4

Making Conduct Risk [Good] Business As Usual
Making Conduct Risk [Good] Business As UsualMaking Conduct Risk [Good] Business As Usual
Making Conduct Risk [Good] Business As UsualAndrew Smart
 
Enterprise Concept partners with IBM to support insurers on Solvency II Risk ...
Enterprise Concept partners with IBM to support insurers on Solvency II Risk ...Enterprise Concept partners with IBM to support insurers on Solvency II Risk ...
Enterprise Concept partners with IBM to support insurers on Solvency II Risk ...Irina Donciu
 
Riskpro company introduction 2013
Riskpro company introduction 2013Riskpro company introduction 2013
Riskpro company introduction 2013Nidhi Gupta
 
Riskpro brief introduction
Riskpro brief introductionRiskpro brief introduction
Riskpro brief introductionNidhi Gupta
 
Riskpro company introduction 2013
Riskpro company introduction 2013Riskpro company introduction 2013
Riskpro company introduction 2013Nidhi Gupta
 
Cross selling 4
Cross selling 4Cross selling 4
Cross selling 4Sen Nathan
 
CV Client Services - Fall 2010
CV Client Services -  Fall 2010CV Client Services -  Fall 2010
CV Client Services - Fall 2010crystalviz
 
Master thesis defence Shu Pei Oei
Master thesis defence Shu Pei OeiMaster thesis defence Shu Pei Oei
Master thesis defence Shu Pei OeiMIPLM
 
Enterprise risk management summary approach guide
Enterprise risk management summary approach guideEnterprise risk management summary approach guide
Enterprise risk management summary approach guideCenapSerdarolu
 
Enterprise risk management summary approach guide
Enterprise risk management summary approach guideEnterprise risk management summary approach guide
Enterprise risk management summary approach guideAstalapulosListestos
 
Ea Enterprise Governance, Reporting And Controls Ii
Ea Enterprise Governance, Reporting And Controls IiEa Enterprise Governance, Reporting And Controls Ii
Ea Enterprise Governance, Reporting And Controls IiNigel Tebbutt
 
FINANCIAL & CORPORATE COLLATERAL > portfolio // Linda C. Modica
FINANCIAL & CORPORATE COLLATERAL > portfolio // Linda C. ModicaFINANCIAL & CORPORATE COLLATERAL > portfolio // Linda C. Modica
FINANCIAL & CORPORATE COLLATERAL > portfolio // Linda C. ModicaLinda Modica
 
Operational Risk Management & Strategic Planning
Operational Risk Management & Strategic PlanningOperational Risk Management & Strategic Planning
Operational Risk Management & Strategic PlanningEneni Oduwole
 
radius-profile[1]
radius-profile[1]radius-profile[1]
radius-profile[1]Naji Alajmi
 
Apresentação da Empresa EN_v24
Apresentação da Empresa EN_v24Apresentação da Empresa EN_v24
Apresentação da Empresa EN_v24Guilherme Lopes
 
Enabling Effective Conduct Risk
Enabling Effective Conduct RiskEnabling Effective Conduct Risk
Enabling Effective Conduct RiskAndrew Smart
 

Similar to Poyry Risk Management Audit ver 4 (20)

Making Conduct Risk [Good] Business As Usual
Making Conduct Risk [Good] Business As UsualMaking Conduct Risk [Good] Business As Usual
Making Conduct Risk [Good] Business As Usual
 
Enterprise Concept partners with IBM to support insurers on Solvency II Risk ...
Enterprise Concept partners with IBM to support insurers on Solvency II Risk ...Enterprise Concept partners with IBM to support insurers on Solvency II Risk ...
Enterprise Concept partners with IBM to support insurers on Solvency II Risk ...
 
Bara ERM v2
Bara ERM v2Bara ERM v2
Bara ERM v2
 
Riskpro company introduction 2013
Riskpro company introduction 2013Riskpro company introduction 2013
Riskpro company introduction 2013
 
Riskpro brief introduction
Riskpro brief introductionRiskpro brief introduction
Riskpro brief introduction
 
Riskpro company introduction 2013
Riskpro company introduction 2013Riskpro company introduction 2013
Riskpro company introduction 2013
 
Cross selling 4
Cross selling 4Cross selling 4
Cross selling 4
 
CV Client Services - Fall 2010
CV Client Services -  Fall 2010CV Client Services -  Fall 2010
CV Client Services - Fall 2010
 
Master thesis defence Shu Pei Oei
Master thesis defence Shu Pei OeiMaster thesis defence Shu Pei Oei
Master thesis defence Shu Pei Oei
 
Enterprise risk management summary approach guide
Enterprise risk management summary approach guideEnterprise risk management summary approach guide
Enterprise risk management summary approach guide
 
Enterprise risk management summary approach guide
Enterprise risk management summary approach guideEnterprise risk management summary approach guide
Enterprise risk management summary approach guide
 
Ea Enterprise Governance, Reporting And Controls Ii
Ea Enterprise Governance, Reporting And Controls IiEa Enterprise Governance, Reporting And Controls Ii
Ea Enterprise Governance, Reporting And Controls Ii
 
FINANCIAL & CORPORATE COLLATERAL > portfolio // Linda C. Modica
FINANCIAL & CORPORATE COLLATERAL > portfolio // Linda C. ModicaFINANCIAL & CORPORATE COLLATERAL > portfolio // Linda C. Modica
FINANCIAL & CORPORATE COLLATERAL > portfolio // Linda C. Modica
 
Operational Risk Management & Strategic Planning
Operational Risk Management & Strategic PlanningOperational Risk Management & Strategic Planning
Operational Risk Management & Strategic Planning
 
Mhc 2008
Mhc 2008Mhc 2008
Mhc 2008
 
radius-profile[1]
radius-profile[1]radius-profile[1]
radius-profile[1]
 
Apresentação da Empresa EN_v24
Apresentação da Empresa EN_v24Apresentação da Empresa EN_v24
Apresentação da Empresa EN_v24
 
Enabling Effective Conduct Risk
Enabling Effective Conduct RiskEnabling Effective Conduct Risk
Enabling Effective Conduct Risk
 
Erm talking points
Erm talking pointsErm talking points
Erm talking points
 
Riskpro capital markets industry 2013
Riskpro capital markets industry 2013Riskpro capital markets industry 2013
Riskpro capital markets industry 2013
 

More from Heine Rønningen

Julenissens clearingsentral
Julenissens clearingsentralJulenissens clearingsentral
Julenissens clearingsentralHeine Rønningen
 
Eex energy norway dec 2018
Eex   energy norway dec 2018Eex   energy norway dec 2018
Eex energy norway dec 2018Heine Rønningen
 
Eex montel nordic energy days 2018
Eex   montel nordic energy days 2018Eex   montel nordic energy days 2018
Eex montel nordic energy days 2018Heine Rønningen
 
Eex naet liquidity task force 23 may 2018
Eex   naet liquidity task force 23 may 2018Eex   naet liquidity task force 23 may 2018
Eex naet liquidity task force 23 may 2018Heine Rønningen
 
Eex naet annual meeting 2018
Eex   naet annual meeting 2018Eex   naet annual meeting 2018
Eex naet annual meeting 2018Heine Rønningen
 
Will EU regulations stifle financial power trading?
Will EU regulations stifle financial power trading?Will EU regulations stifle financial power trading?
Will EU regulations stifle financial power trading?Heine Rønningen
 
Forward market & NC FCA criteria explained. Small & large bidding zones comb...
Forward market & NC FCA criteria explained. Small & large bidding zones comb...Forward market & NC FCA criteria explained. Small & large bidding zones comb...
Forward market & NC FCA criteria explained. Small & large bidding zones comb...Heine Rønningen
 
Montel Nordiske Prisdrivere 2015 - EU Regulations
Montel   Nordiske Prisdrivere 2015 - EU RegulationsMontel   Nordiske Prisdrivere 2015 - EU Regulations
Montel Nordiske Prisdrivere 2015 - EU RegulationsHeine Rønningen
 

More from Heine Rønningen (9)

Julenissens clearingsentral
Julenissens clearingsentralJulenissens clearingsentral
Julenissens clearingsentral
 
Eex energy norway dec 2018
Eex   energy norway dec 2018Eex   energy norway dec 2018
Eex energy norway dec 2018
 
Eex montel nordic energy days 2018
Eex   montel nordic energy days 2018Eex   montel nordic energy days 2018
Eex montel nordic energy days 2018
 
Eex naet liquidity task force 23 may 2018
Eex   naet liquidity task force 23 may 2018Eex   naet liquidity task force 23 may 2018
Eex naet liquidity task force 23 may 2018
 
Eex naet annual meeting 2018
Eex   naet annual meeting 2018Eex   naet annual meeting 2018
Eex naet annual meeting 2018
 
System price calculation
System price calculationSystem price calculation
System price calculation
 
Will EU regulations stifle financial power trading?
Will EU regulations stifle financial power trading?Will EU regulations stifle financial power trading?
Will EU regulations stifle financial power trading?
 
Forward market & NC FCA criteria explained. Small & large bidding zones comb...
Forward market & NC FCA criteria explained. Small & large bidding zones comb...Forward market & NC FCA criteria explained. Small & large bidding zones comb...
Forward market & NC FCA criteria explained. Small & large bidding zones comb...
 
Montel Nordiske Prisdrivere 2015 - EU Regulations
Montel   Nordiske Prisdrivere 2015 - EU RegulationsMontel   Nordiske Prisdrivere 2015 - EU Regulations
Montel Nordiske Prisdrivere 2015 - EU Regulations
 

Poyry Risk Management Audit ver 4

  • 1. Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit Oslo, January 2015
  • 2. 2 PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING – ENERGY  Europe’s leading specialist energy management consultancy  Offering expert advice from strategy to implementation on policy, regulation, business operations, financing and valuation and sustainability  Providing in-depth market analysis and strategic insight across Europe  Over 200 energy market experts in 12 offices across Europe:  Düsseldorf  Helsinki  London  Milan  Moscow  Oslo  Oxford  Paris  Vienna  Villach  Zurich  Madrid
  • 3. 3 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT …from board room to trading desk and back
  • 4. 4 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT You do not want last resort Auditors to take lead: Enterprise Risk Management needs to be forward looking and proactive – are you ready for the future?
  • 5. 5 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT What’s up?  Expected cost:  EU regulations and the transition towards Internal Energy Market (IEM).  Tougher regulation sanctions (unlimited?).  Change of market design and capacity markets  More mandatory reporting.  Expected revenue:  Current market prices are down  Future market prices are down  Will we ever see nominal 2008 levels again?  Expected P&L  Does expected P&L, return and dividend reflect changes in revenue and cost?  Does asset valuation reflect market values?  Should stable dividend expectations be solved by increasing risk? Enterprise Risk Management needs to be forward looking and proactive – are you ready for the future? Energy Act EU regulation
  • 6. 6 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT  Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit is a structured way to diagnose current status, identify need for change, redesign and implement ERM improvements.  Supplementary examples:  Enterprise Risk Management - Frameworks Frameworks are nothing but frameworks they all need tailormade implementation. Putting it all togheter depends on KPI & KRI library quality and several other factors.  Enterprise Risk Management - Compliance Point of no return is reached. Transition from Energy Act to EU regulation will be a gamechanger. We are moving from intention based frameworks to detailed regulations.  Enterprise Risk Management - Tailor made implementation Several issues to look at depending on company. Provided examples are meant as ideas for scoping with clients. Todays agenda:
  • 7. 7 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT Enterprise Risk Management Goals & Process: Enterprise Risk Management goals:  Understanding the shock resistance of the enterprise to its key risks  Managing enterprise risk exposure to the level desired by senior management. Enterprise Risk Management process:  Coordinating Risk Management Objectives and Components  Focusing on cooperation among departments to manage the organization’s full range of risks as a whole.  Creating a framework for effectively managing uncertainty, responding to risk and harnessing opportunities as they arise.  Embodying the notion that risk analysis cuts across the entire organization. RM Objectives RiskComponents
  • 8. 8 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT What is it, why do you need it and the alternative approach What: Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit is a structured way to diagnose current status, identify need for change, redesign and implement ERM improvements:  Based on real world experience from trading & hedging environments combined with decades of fundamental analysis and studies.  Voluntary, Confidential and Objective Why: Enterprise Risk Management is vulnerable to implementation and often fail to deliver:  Consistency and coherency are crucial in all aspects of implementation. Lack of standardization, communication, coordination, cooperation and understanding are devastating.  Need for tailor made implementation combined with strong dependency on individuals  Internal audits cannot be neutral and objective  Mandatory external audits are ex-post focused (based on accounting & tax legislations)  Solutions that are not soundly based could contribute to unforeseen consequences and increased risk Alternative: External audits and an objective second opinion are a far more convenient way of improving ERM quality than learning the hard way from own mistakes Diagnostic Redesign Implementation
  • 9. 9 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGMENT AUDIT  Evaluating G’SOT:  Goal  Strategy  Objectives  Tactics  With focus on:  ERM Framework  Strategic RM  Compliance RM  Reputational RM  Financial RM  Operational RM  Using:  KPI, KRI and KCI  Evaluation:  Gap analysis  Improvement Proposal Voluntary, Confidential and Objective audit with intention of improvement 1. KPI: Key Performance Indicators, KRI: Key Risk Indicators, KCI: Key Control Indicators
  • 10. 10 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGMENT AUDIT  Evaluating G’SOT:  Goal  Strategy  Objectives  Tactics  With focus on:  ERM Framework  Strategic RM  Compliance RM  Reputational RM  Financial RM  Operational RM  Using:  KPI, KRI and KCI  Evaluation:  Gap analysis  Improvement Proposal Voluntary, Confidential and Objective audit with intention of improvement 1. KPI: Key Performance Indicators, KRI: Key Risk Indicators, KCI: Key Control Indicators
  • 11. 11COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT 11PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING Where do we start? Data collection: • Why are we in business: • G’SOT (Goals, Strategy, Objectives and Tactics) • Evaluation of G’SOT consistency & coherency with ERM Framework • Strategic-, Compliance-, Reputational-, Financial-, Operational RM • KPI, KRI and KCI Library Phase 1 - Identification Phase 2 - Capture Diagnostic Redesign Implementation Based on: Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit Diagnostic Report • Proposal for RM redesign DescriptionResult Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit Diagnostic Report: • GAP quantification • Identification of improvement Based on: Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit Redesign Proposal • Significant on-site presence • Implementation of new management processes and information tools • Coaching and training of staff at all levels to utilize improvements • Capture of improved KPI, KRI and KCI results Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit Redesign Proposal: • Presentation of the proposal • Red flag report, identification of implementation challenges. • Define solutions to overcome technical barriers Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit Implementation Report: • Identification of improvement • Identification of objectives for follow up
  • 12. 12COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT 12PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING Details on Phase 1 Phase 1 - Identification Diagnostic DescriptionResult Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit Diagnostic Report: • GAP quantification • Identification of improvement  Approach, context and scope of the Audit • Identify an appropriate suite of focus areas • Project work streams details • Project timeline • Budget  What we need from you: • Quantitative & qualitative description of G’SOT • ERM Framework, e.g.: • Organisation map and risk owner hirarchy • Risk policy & operational risk limits • Portfolio structure • KPI, KRI and KCI Library  Deliverables • Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit Report:  Pöyry project team: • Heine Rønningen • Michel Martin • Cathrine Torvestad Data collection: • Why are we in business: • G’SOT (Goals, Strategy, Objectives and Tactics) • Evaluation of G’SOT consistency & coherency with ERM Framework • Strategic-, Compliance-, Reputational-, Financial-, Operational RM • KPI, KRI & KCI Library
  • 13. 13 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT  Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit is a structured way to diagnose current status, identify need for change, redesign and implement ERM improvements.  Supplementary examples:  Enterprise Risk Management - Frameworks Frameworks are nothing but frameworks they all need tailormade implementation. Putting it all togheter depends on KPI & KRI library quality and several other factors.  Enterprise Risk Management - Compliance Point of no return is reached. Transition from Energy Act to EU regulation will be a gamechanger. We are moving from intention based frameworks to detailed regulations.  Enterprise Risk Management - Tailor made implementation Several issues to look at depending on company. Provided examples are meant as ideas for scoping with clients. Todays agenda:
  • 14. 14 ENTERPRICE RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS  ERM Qualitity is dependent on implementation rather than the choice of policy framework school.  ERM Policy based on: • COSO ERM: Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission www.coso.org • RM effect on objectives • RM as a compliance based function • ISO 31000: International Organization for Standardization www.iso.org • R/RM as an event or process • RM as a strategic discipline for making risk-adjusted decisions • COSO/ISO Hybrid or other solutions Enterprice Risk Management (ERM) Policy: Different methodologies, same objective and challanges
  • 15. 15 RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS • RM Quality is dependent on implementation. No closed form solution/equation • RM Policy based on: • @ Risk methodology: • Value at Risk (VaR) • Cash flow at Risk (CFaR) • Profit at Risk (PaR) • X at Risk (XaR) • Other methods: • Function of probability and expected value • All based on: • Predefined distributions • Empirical values • Monte Carlo simulation • Market values • Mean reversion • External boundaries • Assumptions Strategic, Compliance, Reputational, Financial, Operational RM Policy: Different methodologies, same objective and challenges
  • 16. 16 RISK MANAGEMENT CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCY Missing link between RM components can be devastating in reaching the objectives. Consistent: the quality of behaving the same way over time (input, methodology, output). Coherent: the quality of being logically connected (organization levels, business units..). Consistency and coherency are of outmost importance in all aspects of the business
  • 17. 17 RISK MANAGEMENT CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCY  Expected EBITDA  Dividend Capacity  CAPEX budget Financial RM Link Operational RM  Risk owners  Exposure limits  Stop loss rules  HedgingRehedging strategy  A common base for:  Input  Calculation methods  Output
  • 18. 18 RISK MANAGEMENT CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCY Specific: Explicit description of what we are measuring Measureable: Absolute or relative benchmark values Achievable: Far fetched goals are discouraging Relevant: Coherent with objectives and Consistent over time Time-bound: time dimension and granularity must be explicit Are the indicators SMART
  • 19. 19 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT  Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit is a structured way to diagnose current status, identify need for change, redesign and implement ERM improvements.  Supplementary examples:  Enterprise Risk Management - Frameworks Frameworks are nothing but frameworks they all need tailormade implementation. Putting it all togheter depends on KPI & KRI library quality and several other factors.  Enterprise Risk Management - Compliance Point of no return is reached. Transition from Energy Act to EU regulation will be a gamechanger. We are moving from intention based frameworks to detailed regulations.  Enterprise Risk Management - Tailor made implementation Several issues to look at depending on company. Provided examples are meant as ideas for scoping with clients. Todays agenda:
  • 20. 20 RISK MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE Both external & internal compliance are important • External: • Regulations – Increasing regulatory risk in a rapid changing regulation regime. – MAD & REMIT are at the top of regulators agenda. • Internal: • Business Culture: Googles definition of Knaves «Knaves "lie, cheat, steal, and take credit for other people's work"» ACER and NRA users of Nasdaq OMX Smarts
  • 21. 21  Regulations • EU 713/2009 ACERs role • EU 714/2009 X-Border (NC CACM, NC FCA...) • EU 543/2013 Transparency • EU 1227/2011 (REMIT) Commodity Market abuse & Insider trading • Directive 2004/39/EC (MiFID) • EU 1287/2006 (MiFID IA) • EU 648/2012 (EMIR) Central Clearing Party • EU 596/2014 (MAD) Derivatives Market abuse & Insider trading  Compliance Risk: • Reputational • Sanctions • Worst case: unlimited based on harm RISK MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE Regulations
  • 22. 22 Derivative regulations MiFID: Investor protection, MP classification (fin, non fin +/-) Contract definition and exemptions EMIR: Central Counterparties (CCP) Contract definition from MiFID MAD: Market abuse & inside trading Contract definition from MiFID REMIT: Market abuse & inside trading Own contract definition, Transparency data = inside information (certain criteria) Transparency regulation: Mandatory disclosure of data. Definition of data and data owner. MAD and REMIT => Complimentary regulation with the same intention => Prohibition of market abuse and inside trading Commodity regulations Cross border: EC 714/2009 NC EB: Electricity Balancing NC CACM: Capacity & Congestion NC FCA: FWD Capacity
  • 23. 23 Derivative regulations MiFID: Investor protection, MP classification (fin, non fin +/-) Contract definition and exemptions Commodity regulations Exemption - Must be physically settled - Traded on OTF not RM - Regulated by REMIT Nordic design European design European market design exemption from derivatives? Nordic market design «cannot escape».
  • 24. 24 Derivative regulations MiFID: Investor protection, MP classification (fin, non fin +/-) Contract definition and exemptions Commodity regulations Bilateral leakage - Must be physically settled - Traded on OTF not RM - Regulated by REMIT Nordic design European design • Increased cost under EMIR could possible increase bilateral trading. • Nordic market design «cannot escape». • Physical EFET FEMA with operational netting may be exempted • If Transition to physical => Financial capital may pull out (inc. cost, complexity)
  • 25. 25 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT  Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit is a structured way to diagnose current status, identify need for change, redesign and implement ERM improvements.  Supplementary examples:  Enterprise Risk Management - Frameworks Frameworks are nothing but frameworks they all need tailormade implementation. Putting it all togheter depends on KPI & KRI library quality and several other factors.  Enterprise Risk Management - Compliance Point of no return is reached. Transition from Energy Act to EU regulation will be a gamechanger. We are moving from intention based frameworks to detailed regulations.  Enterprise Risk Management - Tailor made implementation Several issues to look at depending on company. Provided examples are meant as ideas for scoping with clients. Todays agenda:
  • 26. 26 RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION Risk Management : A process of continuous improvement.  Risk Management is not a one shot exercise  Ajustment of objectives  Continuous Risk Assesment • Identify • Analyse • Evaluate  Risk treatment • Create/adjust control enviroment • Control the activities • Inform/Communicate • Monitor  Start over....
  • 27. 27 RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION Risk management function positioning  Risk committee  Chief Risk Officer (CRO)  Both  Keys to success  CRO peer with business line leaders  CRO reporting line to the board (or Risk Committee)  CRO has a broader risk focus than compliance  CRO position and interaction with senior management clearly defined  Managing risk is everyone’s job  Management values RM as an equal discipline to opportunities pursuit
  • 28. 28 RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION KPI & KRI: Assumptions, benchmarking and backtesting performance  Performance evaluation & Hurdle rates:  CAPM «nice tool» for companies quoted on an exchange with relevant peers.  Most companies are not quoted on an exchange  What is your Market Cap, Beta or Small Cap premium?  Other evaluation methods based on risk adjusted performance:  RORAC: Return On Risk Adjusted Capital  RAROC: Risk Adjusted Return On Capital  RARORAC: Risk Adjusted Return On Risk Adjusted Capital  Sharp Ratio: Actual return – Risk free rate / Volatility  V2 Ratio – Actual return vs. Benchmark return  Bonus programs & performance based incentives  Relation to KPI & KRI  Size, Downside risk, Watermark
  • 29. 29 RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION  Must be sound based in corporate G’SOT  Example:  KPI = max (Actual Price/DA Price)  Does not say anything about the potential or the risk:  Bearish scenario:  No hedge: KPI = 1, highest risk, 100% lost potential  Hedge A: KPI = 1.8, lowest risk, 20% lost potential  Hedge B: KPI = 1.2, high risk, 80% lost potential  Bullish scenario  No hedge: KPI = 1, highest risk, 0% lost potential  Hedge A: KPI = 0.6, lowest risk, 80% lost potential  Hedge B: KPI = 0.9, high risk, 20% lost potential  Hedging close to delivery gives higher probability of maximizing KPI at the price of a higher risk:  A good strategy for a lazy trader with P&L incentives only?  Perhaps not that good for the company? KPI & KRI selection
  • 30. 30 RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION  Standardized process  Tailormade content  A non-summative drill down exercise  Define risk apetite:  Reward risk mitigation on some risks?  Reward risk adjusted P&L on some risks? KPI & KRI Selection and calibration based on G’SOT & Risk Assessment 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒, 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤, 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑜𝑖𝑟 + + 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 = 𝑓 ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑟𝑚𝑐, 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 + + 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 = 𝑓 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒, 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑠𝑛𝑜𝑤 + +
  • 31. 31 RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION KPI & KRI: Risk owner & portfolio framework  Creating an efficient library of KPI & KRI is highly dependent on portfolio structure  Separation of Preformance & Risk related to key elements crucial:  Forecast  Inflow  Constraints  Regulations  Basis  Profile  Bidding Zone  Market  Xtra  Static  Dynamic
  • 32. 32 RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION KPI & KRI: Risk owner & portfolio framework  Efficient portfolio structure makes it easier to adjust risk according to objectives using KPI & KRI triggers
  • 33. 33 RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION KPI & KRI: Assumptions, benchmarking and backtesting market input
  • 34. 34  Standardized & Cleared:  ..or Bilateral OTC  Counterparty Credit Risk  Based on Basel II/III – A-IRB – IRB – Standard  Internal models RISK MANAGEMENT TAILOR MADE IMPLEMENTATION Counterparty Credit Risk: Bilateral OTC vs. Central Counterparties
  • 35. 35 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGMENT AUDIT  ERM Quality is dependent on implementation rather than the choice of policy framework school.  RM Quality is dependent on implementation. No closed form solution/equation  Missing link between RM components can be devastating in reaching the objectives.  External Compliance Risk worst case: unlimited based on harm  ERM is dependent on implementation. There are no closed form solutions. Mistakes can be devastating in reaching the objectives. Consequences could worst case be unlimited. ERM Presentation red ink summary:  External mandatory audit is based on accounting legislation – vague on risk management.  Use Pöyry Enterprise Risk Management Audit to fill the gap.
  • 36. 36 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT …most black swans are white. Controlling your risks gives you confidence within the confidence interval.
  • 37. Contacts: Heine Rønningen Email: heine.ronningen@poyry.com Telefon: +47 90 60 87 74 Michel Martin Email: michel.martin@poyry.com Telefon: +47 xxxxxxxx Cathrine Torvestad Email: cathrine.torvestad@poyry.com Telefon: +47 xxxxxxxx
  • 38. 38 PÖYRY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AUDIT Putting it all togheter... RM: Strategic Compliance Reputational Financial Operational Mission & Vision _Goals __ Strategies ___Objectives ____Tactics
  • 39. 39 KPI = MAX (ACTUAL PRICE/DA PRICE) Bearish scenario:
  • 40. 40 KPI = MAX (ACTUAL PRICE/DA PRICE) Bullish scenario:
  • 41. 41 RISK ASSESSMENT  When in doubt..... • Decompose • Identify, analyse, evaluate • Adjust for covariance • Aggregate Identify, Analyse, Evaluate
  • 42. 42 (P) Hedged Item: Forecast (T) Tax: = 31% of P (S) Spot: = x% of P-T (H) Hedge Total: = P - T – S (Hstd) Hedge Total Standard = (H) MWh mapped to standard hedging instruments (Hx) Hedge Xtra: = max (Hstd) (Hs) Hedge Static: = Hstd - Hx (Hd) Hedge Dynamic: = Hstd - Hs RISK OWNER & PORTFOLIO FRAMWORK Value@Risk focus CashFlow@Risk focus
  • 43. 43 RISK OWNER & PORTFOLIO FRAMWORK (P) Hedged item Empirical analysis & forecasts
  • 44. 44 RISK OWNER & PORTFOLIO FRAMWORK (S) Spot A natural hedge if price and generation are negatively correlated
  • 45. 45 RISK OWNER & PORTFOLIO FRAMWORK (Hs) Hedge static Static programs could work both for actual hedging and benchmark
  • 46. 46 RISK OWNER & PORTFOLIO FRAMWORK (Hd) Hedge dynamic Close to trading activity, stronger demand for KPI & KRI
  • 47. 47 HEDGED ITEM VS. HEDGING INSTRUMENT, HEDGING COST
  • 48. 48 NORMAL DISTRIBUTED PRICE CHANGE VS. ACTUAL
  • 50. 50 VALUE AT RISK OUTLIERS