2. Snapshots of a typical month in the information jungle
“Super Thursday” – 2,500 new titles were published in a single day on
1 October 2009
The Lost Symbol – Dan Brown’s new œuvre
300,000 UK copies sold in 36 hours, over ½ million in first week – 2
million total in UK, US and Canada
5% reported to be e-book sales
The Amazon Kindle went on sale
Simon & Schuster launched the Vook (followed by the Barnes & Noble
Nook)
The German Chancellor declared that on grounds of copyright she
and her government oppose Google’s plans for a global digital library
Co-incidentally, Sergey Brin defended Google Books in a New York
Times article A Library to Last Forever
Ordnance Survey announced innovation licences
free access to OS data for development purposes
Royal Mail issued cease-and-desist notices to the postcode lookup
site Ernest Marples Postcodes
US commentator Steven Clift is astonished that UK postcode data is not
public property
The US Government made the Federal Register available free of
charge online
The London Evening Standard became a free-sheet
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
3. In a packed programme…
A look at the library paradigm
Shifting the paradigm – a bit of history
The future of paper and books
The future of libraries and LIS professionals
What’s wrong with libraries?
Are we drinking in the Last Chance Saloon?
How Google are we?
Fee or free?
What would others do?
What should CILIP do?
What will YOU do?
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
4. define:paradigm
The generally accepted view of a given discipline at
a particular time (Princeton U)
The accepted model or pattern
A system of assumption, concepts, systems and
practices (Wikipedia)
It’s widely considered that paradigms cannot easily be
defined in social sciences
A fictional mutant character in Marvel Comics
So maybe we do need to shift that paradigm!
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
5. The library paradigm
“Paradigm shaking”
credit for this term is not mine, but it fits well here
A library is a collection of sources, resources and
services, and the structure in which it is housed; it is
maintained by a public body, institution or
individual
A collection of useful materials for common use
(used in this sense in fields such as computer
science)
But is that all?
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
6. Paradigm shift*?
What is the library paradigm?
What is CILIP’s paradigm?
Are they “fit for purpose” in the second
decade of the 21st century?
What can we do?
*”a radical change in thinking from an accepted point of view to a new one,
necessitated when new discoveries produce anomalies in the current
paradigm”
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
7. Disruptive innovations
The printing press
Electronic media
Libraries
Search engines
Google
Wired, (US edition), October 2009 calls these innovations
“Dangerous Ideas”. Its list contains several information-related suggestions.
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
8. The future of paper – two current views
Books are “where words go to die” (according to Jeff Jarvis, author of What
Would Google Do – more in a moment)
They cannot be updated once printed
They lack interactivity e.g. there are no direct hyperlinks from the
references to the books and articles listed, so you have to hunt them
down in order to read the items referenced
Hamlet’s Blackberry*
Paper’s lack of interactivity improves readers’ focus (and the outcomes
of their reading experience)
The “gold standard” that e-paper designers strive for is to emulate … er,
real paper
Paper will not die at least until e-media are equally as good, and then
some
*by William Powers. Cambridge, MA, Joan Shorenstein Center,
John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2006
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
9. Tape
8 inch
A history of publishing Punched
disk
5¼ inch
disk
cartridges
(various)
tape
3½ inch DVD
diskette
Punched Domesday
cards Disc (oops)
Copies of 1086 version still going strong HDD
Magnetic CD
tape
USB drive
Camera
Electronic media
cards (SD,
CF, XD…)
Quasi-electronic
media
Paper
See how many electronic formats we’ve
had in 30 years – and how many of them are
already obsolete and unreadable
Ephemeral (e-mail, old web pages)
Growing, multi-format – much is lost
forever but still potentially important
1450 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
10. A range of media…
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
11. But reports of the death of paper…
like Mark Twain’s death – and indeed his
actual quotation – have been exaggerated
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
12. The future of libraries
What’s wrong with libraries? :
Why are libraries still indelibly linked to books, and books alone, in the
public’s mind, when we offer so much more?
Why don’t people recognise our roles as facilitators of content creation
and as gatherers and keepers of the wisdom of our communities?
Why do people assume that they can’t go to libraries for what they
need and want? (What concept do they have of the role of libraries?)
Who makes the policies for managing (y)our LIS?
Political representatives?
Chief librarians (and heads of knowledge)?
Librarians at the service desks?
Users?
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
13. Last orders please
We appear to be no longer relevant to many (non) users
Surveys show :
The Google Generation consult their peers, social media, Google …
and libraries are way down the list
Members of Generation Y do use the library … so that they can get
computer access [Pew survey Dec 2007]
Users of “traditional” services are in decline – simple
demographics
At this rate libraries as we know them will be extinct by 2020
along with Woolworths, Setanta, Kodachrome
their business models did not work any more
moral : you cannot live on pick ‘n’ mix forever, nor on media
or services that people aren’t buying
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
14. Libraries as place
We have award winning libraries in great locations
Brighton, Norwich, and more to come (such as Birmingham)
Yet Gen Y users aren’t bothered – and that’s a challenge to us
They’re mobile, they’re online, they tweet as they go
They challenges our ways of working (but don’t forget some of their
fellow library users like service the old fashioned way)
New uses (and users) for library space
How do you challenge people like the US college principal who
abolished the library
“When I look at books, I see an outdated technology, like scrolls
before books,’’
Our current paradigms are not good enough for future use
At least, not if we want any kind of job security or satisfaction
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
15. What would others do?
Let’s look at what might happen if we let some well
known organisations take over libraries and
information services
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
16. If the supermarket chains ran public
libraries…
There would be edge-of-town super-libraries
Do libraries still have to be close to user population? –
rural disadvantage is not sustainable in Digital Britain, but services are
focused on fixed branch libraries, the bigger the library the more services
people are used to travelling to shopping centres far from home
if library standards no longer matter in some parts of the UK, why do we
still bother to count how many people live more than a mile from their
nearest library?
The mobile library would deliver at a time of your choosing, bringing a crate
of books you’d ordered online, and would suggest some DVDs (and possibly
offer to tax your car)
What is success in our business?
many copies of best-sellers in stock, everything else to order?
a wide and eclectic range but you may have to wait for popular items?
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
17. If public libraries were run like budget
airlines …
The libraries would cost each council tax payer 2p a year,
BUT
there would be a charge of £5 for checking out each book
and oversize books would cost an extra £3
Books would be filed on the shelves anywhere there was
still a gap
You’d be charged for every shopping bag you brought
into the library
You would have to enter and leave the library via external
steps to the first floor
Major towns would be served by branches in small
villages 50 miles away
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
18. If Google ran libraries
The library would have a trillion items always in stock
though the librarian might not be able to find the one you want
and you might only be able to read 20% of it in random chunks
unless you bought it
You’d almost always get an answer to your query
and though there would be no book selection you’d be told which
items everyone else thought were best
the top three books would be sponsored by the local bookshop
There’d be lots of outreach services
and a lot more fuss about how innovative they were
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
19. Hang on a minute …
Google’s states that its ambition is to manage the world’s
knowledge
That’s what we do!
Google says it wants to find and present the most authoritative
sources of information
That’s what we do!
Google is putting together a collection of all the world’s books
That’s what we do!
Google wants to support communities of information
That’s what we do!
We must be a lot more like Google than we thought!
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
20. In fact, hasn’t Google copied us?
“Google acts like libraries. It is the mission of both to organize
the world’s information, to make it openly accessible, to find
and present the most authoritative (by many definitions)
sources, to instil an ethic of information use in the public, to
act as a platform for communities of information, to
encourage creation”.
“Isn’t Google already running the public library of our digital
knowledge?”
Jeff Jarvis, Library Journal, January 22, 2009
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
21. What Would Google Do?
Are libraries and Google inevitable enemies?
“Kill the book to save the book”
Hyperlinking the content of books
Print is portable but wi-fi and broadband are becoming ubiquitous so can
offer connectivity to e-book readers and other mobile reading devices
Digital Britain [May 2009]
FCC rural broadband report [May 2009]
Are librarians mere guardians or interpreters of form and content?
How can libraries be “Googlier”?
curating the web – collecting and preserving relevant online content
creating expert online communities
See : Jeff Jarvis, What Would Google Do? Harper Business, 2009.
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
22. How Google-ish are libraries?
√ Organisers of knowledge
√ Collectors and digitisers of information resources
X Open to anyone worldwide, not restricted by location or
membership of a particular customer group
Problems using finance from one place to serve another
SCL initiative to provide Universal Access for UK public
? Constantly valuing and brokering information
Google micro-auctions information millions of times per hour
We evaluate and broker information but not on that scale
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
23. What CILIP did
This year’s events
The Web 2.0 open meeting
End result of a blog about control and ownership (a debate we need
to conclude)
Information matters
Progress is slow but that’s the pace of government
Highlighted the value of FoQA in supporting the profession
Emphasised the value of continuing collaboration with SOA, BCS
and others
Responses to consultations (but there are so many of
them!!!)
Digital Britain
Not just £6 tax on your phone bill – opportunity!
Digital inclusion, 21st century schools, 2020 workforce strategy, website
quality, public library leadership, 21st century archives, data sharing,
children’s health
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
24. What CILIP did
School libraries policy adopted
Awards – CILIP Carnegie & Kate Greenaway, Libraries Change
Lives
Published good library guidelines
Launched Encompass
Supported the LIS Research Coalition
A vital step towards providing the evidence base that we must
have
At last we can start to demonstrate value
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
25. See the Coalition web site at
http://LISResearch.org
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
27. What you said this year
You welcomed Encompass
You expect greater advocacy on profession-wide, generic issues such as
the Google debate
You asked if there’s too much emphasis on specific (public library) issues
You wanted a definition of an effective library service
Last week’s public library document is also good as a generic definition
You want CILIP to emphasise the difference between working in a
library and working as an library and information professional
Chief librarians can influence – some good practice e.g. central govt
You said, not all libraries are public libraries, but to look at CILIP you’d
think they were
You said, CILIP must get better at leading, not following, into the new
professional areas of work
You said, CILIP’s support to B&Gs is weakening because Ridgmount
Street staff are too busy to help
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
28. What else you said
You said, CILIP must anticipate developments through horizon scanning, and then take
effective action using that knowledge
You said, CILIP campaigns but it doesn’t engage – CILIP needs to narrowcast and
target influential decision makers
You asked, why don’t the media ask for CILIP’s view on issues that concern
us
Should CILIP comment more on information society issues, not just libraries?
You said, why do we assume that rural areas are not entitled to the same
high levels of service as cities and major towns?
You said, the Policy Forum has disenfranchised branches and groups
You said, CILIP’s key people need to get out more to the members (because
most members can’t get to London)
You said, CILIP needs to work with other bodies and extend its membership
in the wider information profession
We are collaborating with BCS, SOA and RMS on Information Matters
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
29. Some ideas that you had
CILIP should certify websites that carry high quality information, and
make an annual award for the best
Maybe linked to Socitm or other information sector awards
There should be a Carnegie for non-fiction titles
We should find creative and innovative ways to help people in mid-
career to be professional activists
Career breaks, secondments, work experience (for unemployed / new entrants)
You said, it’s mainly retired members who now can get time for CILIP activism
CILIP’s structures must represent the wider world of information
professionalism
Who speaks for information managers in research and corporate environments?
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
30. So, what should CILIP do?
Not all perceptions of CILIP are accurate, but if members believe them to
be true then they become true as received wisdom
Change has happened but we need more
Not what librarians or business managers or elected members want but
what users want
It’s not about how our profession and CILIP were in the past – it’s about
how we go forward
So, what do we know about what our users want, and what gives them
benefit?
Not much - the Research Coalition will help
So, what should or could CILIP do?
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
31. What could CILIP do?
“CILIP Scholar” – we could rate the articles in our excellent
free access package of professional journals
“CILIP Books” – a professional e-library
Book of the Month from the Facet catalogue, viewable on screen
only, save, download and copy disabled – would benefit
members and promote Facet titles
Grow the profession, grow the membership
People are already working in new areas! No need to invent new
societies or roles! What’s in it for these people to join CILIP?
How do we acquire members – who benefits from CILIP
membership, the employer or the employee?
How can we make CILIP more relevant to Gen Y CILIP members
(and especially non-members of CILIP)
How can we make CILIP’s value for money more visible?
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
32. Information Matters – new areas for CILIP
“Every action of government must be open, searchable, and linkable
by default”
Jeff Jarvis, What Would Google Do?
Information Matters is the UK Government’s strategy to achieve this…
… but we have to make sure it happens – progress will be slow before the
general election…
… and we must ensure that our professional role is recognised not just by
our own profession but by government and by the public
CILIP members are among the leaders of this cross-government
initiative, using LIS professional skills alongside IT professionals
They highlight a future role for all information professionals –
not simply to curate and store printed information
but to help every citizen locate and understand the publicly held
information that affects their life and to help them make informed
decisions
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
33. Some issues
Continuity
Presidential themes are annual, but it takes longer (sometimes, much
longer) to achieve a result where external players are involved
After eight years have we now a critical mass of past presidents to
form a Presidential College?
Engagement with employers
Explaining the value of membership
Persuading employers to give CILIP members time to contribute
What’s in it for employers when they give employees time?
Why doesn’t professionalism matter to employers?
“Those libraries are run by professionals – they act professionally
though they’re not actually professional librarians”
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
34. Some tentative conclusions
We are not getting our message across even to our own
members
We are not seen as open but as controlling
We are seen as too focused on one sector and one issue
We cannot get across the message that this is not entirely the case
We must address this, and ensure that we work together to spread the word
to LIS users and to the wider public
We must tailor our messages to our users, not to ourselves
We must get our message into the boardrooms and into government
We must support would-be activists
Employer engagement – explain benefits of activism
Address creeping de-professionalisation in all sectors
We must continue to address the governance issues
The Audit Panel started work in September
Ensuring initiatives don’t stop on 31 December each year
Not just our own governance – one issue can involve four or five government
departments
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
35. What can YOU do?
Drive change from within CILIP
Be an activist and support others to be active
Use your expertise to inform CILIP’s policy process
Help to formulate policies that accurately reflect the issues
Argue the case for LIS professionalism in YOUR workplace
Especially if it’s a non-traditional environment
Recruit LIS professionals to LIS professional posts
Use your expertise and practitioner experience to contribute to the
evidence base, and follow @LISResearch
Offer constructive criticism and get involved to make CILIP more open,
responsive and modern
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths
36. Some good news to end with
Our profession faces an
insurmountable opportunity
New areas of work more than compensate for
losses in our traditional territories, but we must
be flexible
So much is happening in the world of
information that we must be a key player (or we
are corporate toast within five years)
Come to Online and hear me say more!
(Blatant plug)
Copyright 2009 Peter Griffiths