SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 84
Download to read offline
Localized Prostate Cancer in
Puerto Rico
Ricardo F. Sánchez-Ortiz, MD
Assistant Professor of Urology
University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine
Adjunct Assistant Professor of Urology
The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Partnership in Cancer Research
Disclosures
• Intuitive Surgical
– Robotic surgery proctor
– Robotic surgery course faculty
• No stock ownership
Early Detection
• Who should be screened?
• Who should be biopsied?
–At what PSA?
• How should we biopsy?
PLCO trial. NEJM 2009
• 76,693 men
• Screening vs. no screening
– Ages 55 to 75 yrs.
• Followed with PSA for 6 yrs
• No difference in survival
• Problem:
– Screening vs. “partial
screening”
PLCO: 80% of Control Group Participants
had at least 1 PSA during the trial
Shoag et al. NEJM 2016
European Randomized Study for Screening
for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)
• 182,160 men
• Screening versus
no screening
– Ages 55 to 69
• F/U: 16 years
• 21% lower mortality
– 29% after adjusting
non-compliance
Shroder et al, N Engl J Med. 2012
Goteborg Trial
• 20,000 men
• Randomized 1:1
– PSA Screening vs. no
screening every 2 yrs
• Ages 50 to 69 yrs
• Risk reduction of
prostate cancer death
by almost 50%
Hugosson et al, Lancet Oncol, 2010
AUA guidelines 2013
• Every two years between 55 and 70
• Except African American or first degree
family history
What is a “normal” PSA?
Normal
3.67 ng/ml 0.00 – 4.00 ng/ml
Juan del Pueblo
NCCN: biopsy if > 3 ng/ml
PSA Between Median and 2.5 ng/ml
Age range Median Prostate cancer risk
40 – 49 0.7 ng/ml 14.6-fold
50 – 59 0.9 ng/ml 7.6-fold
• Higher Gleason scores
• Higher rate of biochemical progression
Urology: 67(2): 316-20, 2006
Prostate Cancer Gene 3
PCA3
• Gene that expresses non-
coding RNA in human prostate
tissue
• Highly over-expressed in PCa
• Post-DRE first voided urine
specimen
• Lower sensitivity, higher
specificity than PSA
Prostate Health Index (phi)
• NCCN
• Combination of:
– Free PSA
– Total PSA
– p2PSA
PHI Performance Characteristics
X3 more specific
than serum PSA
-may help with
active surveillance
-more likely to
predict higher
grade tumors
• NCCN
• Four Kallikreins
– Total PSA
– Free PSA
– Intact PSA
– Human Kallikrein 2
(hk2)
Prostate biopsy
• Transrectal ultrasound
• Local anesthesia or
sedation
• NCCN guidelines
– 12 or more cores
– Now standard of care
Multiparametric MRI
• MRI-Ultrasound fusion
• Visual estimation
Multiparametric Prostate MRI
• PIRADS 1
• PIRADS 2
• PIRADS 3
• PIRADS 4
• PIRADS 5
Diffusion
Axial
Diffusion
Axial
MRI-guided biopsy with Visual Estimation
Overall Detection Rate
71.8%
56.3% 50.0%
6.2%
9.4%
25.0%
37.5% 40.6%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Standard 12- core only MRI guided nodule
biopsy only
Standard 12-core and
MR guided nodule biopsy
Negative ASAP or HGPIN Positive
n=80
MRI-guided biopsy with Visual Estimation
Detection rate by Gleason Score
46.8%
56.3% 50.0%
6.2%
9.4%
15.6%
9.4%
9.4%
31.2% 31.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Standard 12- core only MRI guided nodule
biopsy only
Standard 12-core and
MR guided nodule biopsy
Negative ASAP or HGPIN
Grade group 1 (gleason 6) Grade group 2 or higher
6.3%
n=80
ISUP/WHO New Grading
System
• Grade 1: Gleason score 6 (3+3)
• Grade 2: Gleason score 7 (3+4)
• Grade 3: Gleason score 7 (4+3)
• Grade 4: Gleason score 8
• Grade 5: Gleason score 9 - 10.
Increase in PCa Aggressiveness
• Patients divided into three groups to compare
clinical and pathological variables over time
• SPSS was used for statistical analysis
A
2007-2009
B
2010-2012
C
2013-2015
119 323 277
PSA and Clinical Stage over Time
5.2
5.9
6.57
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2007-20092010-20122013-2015
serum PSA (ng/dL)
16.0%
26.6%
36.5%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
Clinical Stage > T1c (%)
P<0.05 P<0.0001
N=791
Gleason Score over Time
37.0%
37.0%
65.7%
12.6% 13.0%
20.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2007-2009 2010-2012 2013-2015
GS ≥7 on Biopsy
Primary Gleason Grade 4 on Biopsy
N=791
P<0.05
Cancer Volume on Biopsy over Time
5.2
8.4
9.6
3.6 4
4.9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2007-2009 2010-2012 2013-2015
Total Sum of Cancer Cores per Lobe (mm)
Largest Positive Tumor Core per Lobe (mm)
N=791
P<0.01
P<0.01
Use of Robotic RP over Time
51.3%
93.2%
100.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
2007-2009 2010-2012 2013-2015
N=791P<0.001
A
2007-2009
B
2010-2012
C
2013-2015
119 323 277
Prostate Cancer Mortality in PR
Puerto Rico
2006 – 2010
27.3 per 100,000
Average African
Ancestry: 20.2%
High BMI increases Risk of High Risk
CaP on Biopsy
• Liang et al, J Urol 2014
– CCF
• 3,258 SELECT trial participants
– 29.3% obese
• Without FHx: obesity ñrisk of Gleason ≥ 7 (OR 2.31)
• With FHx: obesity ñ overall risk (3.73) and ñrisk of
Gleason ≥7 (7.95)
BMI Cohort Characteristics
Puerto Rican Prostate Cancer
35.4%
(20% higher than SELECT trial)
Risk of Gleason Score ≥ 7 or
Extraprostatic Disease
*p < 0.05
N=791
Biopsy is positive…Now what?
Staging studies rarely needed
Staging
• Bone scan
– PSA > 20
– Abnormal DRE
and PSA > 10
– Gleason score >7
– T3/T4
– Symptoms
• MRI
– T3, T4
– LN involvement
probability > 10%
CT scan for local staging not as useful
Organ-confined Prostate Cancer
• Active surveillance/watchful waiting
• Surgery
– Open
– Robotic
– Cryoablation
• Radiation therapy
– External beam
– Radioactive Seeds
Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer
Group Randomized Trial
• 695 men
– watchful waiting or radical prostatectomy
• After 8 years:
–50% ↓ cancer-specific mortality
• 7% versus 14%
–50% ↓ distant metastasis
• 13% versus 27%
Holmberg N Engl J Med. 2002
< 65 y/o observation
PIVOT trial
• VA Hospital study. NEJM 2012
– 700 pts. 10 year follow-up
• Surgery vs. Observation
• Surgery only benefitted:
– Gleason 7 or PSA > 10
• Conclusions:
– Men > 60 with low grade, PSA < 10 should
be observed
PIVOT trial
• Problems:
• Elderly, infirmed cohort: mean age 67
yrs
• 40% were dead at 10 years of all
causes
• Only 10% below age 60 yrs.
Organ-confined Prostate Cancer
• Active surveillance/watchful waiting
• Surgery
– Open
– Robotic
– Cryoablation
• Radiation therapy
– External beam
– Radioactive Seeds
Low risk
prostate cancer
Less than 65
Surgical
candidate?
No
Not surgical
candidate or not
accepting risks
Brachytherapy
or EBRT
Cryoablation
Active
surveillance
Yes Surgery
65 or older
Active
surveillance (1st
choice)
Others
Surgery (not
willing to accept
risks)
Radiation
Brachytherapy
External
Radiation
Cryoablation
Ideal Candidate
• Age > 65
• ≤ 2 positive cores
• Gleason 6 only
• Less than 50% core
length involved
• Normal volume-adjusted
PSA
• PSA velocity before
diagnosis < 2 ng/ml/yr
• No perineural invasion
• Free PSA > 15%
• NORMAL mMRI
• Low genomic score
Low risk
prostate cancer
Less than 65
Surgical
candidate?
No
Not surgical
candidate or not
accepting risks
Active
surveillance
Brachytherapy
or EBRT
CryoablationYes Surgery
65 or older
Active
surveillance (1st
choice)
Others
Surgery (not
willing to accept
risks)
Radiation
Brachytherapy
External
Radiation
Cryoablation
Intermediate to
High risk prostate
cancer
Less than 70
Surgical
candidate?
No
Not surgical
candidate or not
accepting risks
External radiation
and Androgen
Deprivation
Yes Surgery
70 to 80 yrs
Life expectancy >
10 years?
Yes
External radiation
and Androgen
Deprivation
UC, Crohn’s, prior
RT
Surgery or
Cryoablation
No Watchful waiting
> 80 years Watchful waiting
Intermediate to
High risk prostate
cancer
Less than 70
Surgical
candidate?
No
Not surgical
candidate or not
accepting risks
External radiation
and Androgen
Deprivation
Yes Surgery
70 to 80 yrs
Life expectancy >
10 years?
Yes
External radiation
and Androgen
Deprivation
UC, Crohn’s, prior
RT
Surgery or
Cryoablation
No Watchful waiting
> 80 years Watchful waiting
Organ-confined Prostate Cancer
• Active surveillance/watchful waiting
• Surgery
– Open
– Laparoscopic/Robotic
– Cryoablation
• Radiation therapy
– IGRT
– Proton therapy
– Brachytherapy
Open
(n=154)
Robotic
(n= 930)
P value
Days with catheter Median 11.7
(8 to 21)
Median 8.1
(5 to 15)
0.0001
OR time 176 min
Median: 175
167 min
Median: 170
no difference
Blood loss 566
(150 to 1300)
143
(20 – 700)
< 0.0001
Blood transfusions 2.5%
(4 pt)
0.004%
(4 pt)
<0.0001
Open Conversion 2/930
Early Complications
• Rectal injury
– Robotic: 0/930
– Open: 2/154
• Ileus:
– Robotic: 2.7% (25/930)
– Open: 3.2% (5/154)
• P = 0.09.
• Prolonged urine leak:
– Robotic: 0.8% (8/930)
– Open: 2.6% (4/154)
• DVT
– Robotic: 0.004% (4/930)
– Open: 1.2% (2/154)
• Stroke
– 1 robotic
Late Complications
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
4 3.9%
Robotic
Open
• Hernia
– Robotic: 2.7% (25/930)
– Open: 0.06% (1/154)
• P= 0.06
• Robotic
– Orchitis
• Bladder neck
contracture/Stricture
– Robotic: 1.2% (11/930)
– Open: 7.7% (12/154)
• P = 0.0001
p = 0.54
N =306 N =154
Positive surgical margins
0
5
10
15
20
25
9.0 6.8
p = 0.13
National average ~ 15.7%
Patel et al. J Urol, 186(2):511-6, 2011
Urinary Continence
Free of pads
> 12 months follow-up
89.1% 92.1%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Open Robotic
*p = 0.04107/120N= 69/72
Posterior Reconstruction
Posterior Reconstruction
Double Layer Anterior Anastomosis
Double Layer Anterior Anastomosis
Incontinence by BMI
N= 300
Incontinence vs. Age
N= 300
Incontinence vs. Diabetes
N=45N=255
Bilateral Nerve Sparing
Having Intercourse with or without PDE5I
(If fully potent preoperatively)
*p = 0.51
N= 75 N= 101
Median f/u 35 mo 10 mo
Risk of ED after 1 year
Multivariate Analysis
P<0.001
OR: 3.30
95% CI: 1.54 to 7.11
P<0.001
OR: 5.02 (if ≥60g)
95% CI 1.88 to 13.4
P<0.02
OR: 3.34
95% CI: 1.25 to 8.89
Adjuvant vs. Salvage Radiation
• Criteria: T3a/T3b or +SM, N0
• EORTC 22911 trial
– 1005 patients. 5 year median follow-up
– 60 Gy
• SWOG 8764 trial, 2009
– 473 men T3 disease. 10 year median follow-up
– 60 to 64 Gy
SWOG 8764
Salvage vs. Adjuvant Radiation
Radiation No radiation
Risk of recurrence 35% 65%
Risk of metastasis
at 10 years
8% 17%
EORTC 22911
– 5-yr PSA-free survival
• 74% versus 52%
– Grade 3 -4 toxicity
• 4.2% vs. 2.6% at 5 years
SWOG 8764’
Salvage vs. Adjuvant Radiation
Improved metastasis-free and overall survival
Thompson et al, J Urol March 2009
Metastasis-free survival Overall survival
Radiation therapy
Secondary Malignancies
• Overall risk: 1/290
• After 10 years:
– Risk: 1/70
customersupport@genomedx.com | www.genomedx.com
Patient Details
Patient Name: Pedro Saade Llorens
Medical Record Number: not provided
Date of Birth: 06/12/1945
Date of Prostatectomy: 01/23/2016
Pathology Laboratory: San Pablo PathologyGroup
Pathologist: Juan Serrano-Olmo, MD, FCAP
Address: 68 CII Santa Cruz Torre San
Pablo Suite 403-404, Bayamon,
PR 00957, USA
Order Information
Order Date: 10/03/2016
Specimen Received Date: 11/04/2016
GenomeDx Accession ID: MC-014608
Specimen ID: 16SP824-B
Ordering Physician: Sanchez Ortiz, Ricardo F
Clinic/Hospital Name: Robotic Urology& Oncology
Institute
Clinic/Hospital Address: 400 FD Roosevelt Suite 306, San
Juan, PR 00918-0000, USA
Clinical Details: Preoperative PSA (ng/mL): N/A Gleason Score: 4+3
SM+ EPE SVI LNI BCR Tertiary Gleason 5
Other: Lymphovascular Invasion
9.4%
8.0%
Your Decipher Result - Genomic High Risk
Decipher Score 0.60
Risk - Percent Likelihood
5-Year Metastasis
10-Year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality
Interpretation
Clinical studies concluded that Decipher high risk men with adverse pathology have a
poor prognosis overall. These men may benefit from adjuvant or early salvage
radiotherapy and consideration for clinical trials.
Relevant findings from published clinical studies: Patients with Decipher high risk had
77% 5-year metastasis free survival and 70% 10-year cause specific survival. For
these patients there was improved metastasis-free survival favoring adjuvant and early
salvage postoperative radiotherapy.
In patients with PSA rise or biochemical recurrence after surgery that received salvage
radiotherapy, only 66.5% remained metastasis free after 5 years.
Decipher Post-Operative Report
*Average clinical risk refers to the average cohort risk of metastasis at 5 years post radical prostatectomy. The average cumulative incidence of metastasis was 6.0%at 5 years post radicalprostatectomy, as
reported by Karnes et al., 2013 from analysis of a cohort of 1,010 men with intermediate and high risk clinical features who received radical prostatectomy as first line treatment at the Mayo Clinic between 2000
and 2006.
Five-year probability of metastasis endpoint: Decipher uses the genomic risk score to predict the 5-year probability of metastasis from the time of radical prostatectomy. Probabilities were generated from a
Cox proportional hazards model based upon a cohort of 1,010 men with intermediate and high risk clinical features with a median 6.9 years of followup. Decipher had an AUC of 0.76-0.85 in multiple clinical
validation studies for prediction of metastasis. Percent likelihood for this endpoint ranges from 0.3-67%.
Ten-year probability of prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM) endpoint: Decipher uses the genomic risk score to predict the 10-year probability of PCSMfrom the time of radical prostatectomy.
Probabilities are generated from a logistic regression analysis based upon a cohort of 557 patients with 112 prostate cancer deaths within 10 years post radical prostatectomy. These probabilities are adjusted for
a PCSMcumulative incidence of 5%at 10 years post radical prostatectomy. All non-PCSMpatients in the study had at least 10 years of follow-up. Decipher had an AUC of 0.72 in predicting PCSM. Percent
likelihood for this endpoint ranges from 0.7-30.5%.
POST OP
DecipherScore
1.00
High
Risk
0.60
Avg.*
Risk
0.45
Low
Risk
0.00
1-3
4-6
1,2
4-6
4
References on reverse
1
1
1-8
9 2,7,8
Your
Decipher
Score
GenomeDx Biosciences Laboratory
10355 Science Center Dr. Suite 240, San Diego, CA92121
Tel: 1-888-792-1601 | Fax: 1-855-324-2768
customersupport@genomedx.com | www.genomedx.com
Patient Details
Patient Name: Pedro Saade Llorens
Medical Record Number: not provided
Date of Birth: 06/12/1945
Date of Prostatectomy: 01/23/2016
Pathology Laboratory: San Pablo PathologyGroup
Pathologist: Juan Serrano-Olmo, MD, FCAP
Address: 68 CII Santa Cruz Torre San
Pablo Suite 403-404, Bayamon,
PR 00957, USA
Order Information
Order Date: 10/03/2016
Specimen Received Date: 11/04/2016
GenomeDx Accession ID: MC-014608
Specimen ID: 16SP824-B
Ordering Physician: Sanchez Ortiz, Ricardo F
Clinic/Hospital Name: Robotic Urology& Oncology
Institute
Clinic/Hospital Address: 400 FD Roosevelt Suite 306, San
Juan, PR 00918-0000, USA
Clinical Details: Preoperative PSA (ng/mL): N/A Gleason Score: 4+3
SM+ EPE SVI LNI BCR Tertiary Gleason 5
Other: Lymphovascular Invasion
9.4%
8.0%
Your Decipher Result - Genomic High Risk
Decipher Score 0.60
Risk - Percent Likelihood
5-Year Metastasis
10-Year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality
Interpretation
Clinical studies concluded that Decipher high risk men with adverse pathology have a
poor prognosis overall. These men may benefit from adjuvant or early salvage
radiotherapy and consideration for clinical trials.
Relevant findings from published clinical studies: Patients with Decipher high risk had
77% 5-year metastasis free survival and 70% 10-year cause specific survival. For
these patients there was improved metastasis-free survival favoring adjuvant and early
salvage postoperative radiotherapy.
Decipher Post-Operative Report
POST OP
DecipherScore
1.00
High
Risk
0.60
Avg.*
Risk
0.45
Low
Risk
1-3
4-6
1,2
4-6
Your
Decipher
Score
DocuSign Envelope ID: BC1F6A69-5EFD-4C0D-822E-0779A9BCF451
Organ-confined Prostate Cancer
• Active surveillance/watchful waiting
• Surgery
– Open
– Laparoscopic/Robotic
– Cryoablation
• Radiation therapy
– IGRT
– Proton therapy
– Brachytherapy
Brachytherapy
Brachytherapy
• Gleason 6, PSA <10, T1c
• Less than 50% of cores positive
• No perineural invasion
• PSA before diagnosis < 2 ng/ml/yr.
• Feasibility:
– Volume < 70 cc , > 25 cc
– No voiding symptoms
– No previous TURP
External Beam Radiotherapy
IMRT - IGRT
75.6 Gy
conform to PTV
c Effect of Organ
ariability
Original Plan on New CT
Fiducial Markers
• Electromagnetic
transponders
• 4D localization system
• Motion shifts
continuously monitored
• No extra radiation used
Calypso ©
Case: C.R.
• 53 y/o
• PSA: 3.5 ng/ml
• DRE: Bilateral SV
and R extraprostatic
(T3a, T3b)
• Prostate: 50 grams
• Patient weight: 310
pounds
IMRT plus androgen deprivation
Randomized Trial
RT vs. RT+ADT
D’Amico. JAMA 2008
Clínica Las Américas Suite 306, Hato Rey
787-756-5200

More Related Content

What's hot

Point counterpoint in PCa screening
Point counterpoint in PCa screeningPoint counterpoint in PCa screening
Point counterpoint in PCa screeningPatricia Khashayar
 
Psa guideline exercise
Psa guideline exercisePsa guideline exercise
Psa guideline exerciseJohn Voss
 
EAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtaba
EAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtabaEAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtaba
EAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtabaDr Ali MUJTABA
 
Charting surgical results for high grade prostate cancer
Charting surgical results for high grade prostate cancerCharting surgical results for high grade prostate cancer
Charting surgical results for high grade prostate cancerGil Lederman
 
Briefing Note: Cervical Cancer Screening in the Gwassi Division, Suba Distric...
Briefing Note: Cervical Cancer Screening in the Gwassi Division, Suba Distric...Briefing Note: Cervical Cancer Screening in the Gwassi Division, Suba Distric...
Briefing Note: Cervical Cancer Screening in the Gwassi Division, Suba Distric...sarahsteklov
 
NY Prostate Cancer Conference - L. Klotz - Session 3: Active surveillance: PS...
NY Prostate Cancer Conference - L. Klotz - Session 3: Active surveillance: PS...NY Prostate Cancer Conference - L. Klotz - Session 3: Active surveillance: PS...
NY Prostate Cancer Conference - L. Klotz - Session 3: Active surveillance: PS...European School of Oncology
 
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
POC Breast 1 | 2007 -  	Adjuvant Endocrine TherapyPOC Breast 1 | 2007 -  	Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Endocrine Therapyrtp
 
What Services (and Frequencies) Are Deemed Necessary by Patients?
What Services (and Frequencies) Are Deemed Necessary by Patients? What Services (and Frequencies) Are Deemed Necessary by Patients?
What Services (and Frequencies) Are Deemed Necessary by Patients? Mgfamiliar Net
 
Better Understanding of the Epidemiology of Lung Cancer
Better Understanding of the Epidemiology of Lung CancerBetter Understanding of the Epidemiology of Lung Cancer
Better Understanding of the Epidemiology of Lung CancerSpectrum Health System
 
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic DiseasePOC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Diseasertp
 

What's hot (20)

Prostate cancer (screening)
Prostate cancer (screening)Prostate cancer (screening)
Prostate cancer (screening)
 
Point counterpoint in PCa screening
Point counterpoint in PCa screeningPoint counterpoint in PCa screening
Point counterpoint in PCa screening
 
Psa guideline exercise
Psa guideline exercisePsa guideline exercise
Psa guideline exercise
 
Louvard Y - Start radial and advance the skill
Louvard Y - Start radial and advance the skillLouvard Y - Start radial and advance the skill
Louvard Y - Start radial and advance the skill
 
Monique Roobol: Risk Stratification
Monique Roobol: Risk Stratification Monique Roobol: Risk Stratification
Monique Roobol: Risk Stratification
 
Speiser B - AIMRADIAL 2015 - Ambulation times
Speiser B - AIMRADIAL 2015 - Ambulation timesSpeiser B - AIMRADIAL 2015 - Ambulation times
Speiser B - AIMRADIAL 2015 - Ambulation times
 
EAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtaba
EAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtabaEAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtaba
EAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtaba
 
Charting surgical results for high grade prostate cancer
Charting surgical results for high grade prostate cancerCharting surgical results for high grade prostate cancer
Charting surgical results for high grade prostate cancer
 
Carcinoma prostate
Carcinoma prostateCarcinoma prostate
Carcinoma prostate
 
Briefing Note: Cervical Cancer Screening in the Gwassi Division, Suba Distric...
Briefing Note: Cervical Cancer Screening in the Gwassi Division, Suba Distric...Briefing Note: Cervical Cancer Screening in the Gwassi Division, Suba Distric...
Briefing Note: Cervical Cancer Screening in the Gwassi Division, Suba Distric...
 
NY Prostate Cancer Conference - L. Klotz - Session 3: Active surveillance: PS...
NY Prostate Cancer Conference - L. Klotz - Session 3: Active surveillance: PS...NY Prostate Cancer Conference - L. Klotz - Session 3: Active surveillance: PS...
NY Prostate Cancer Conference - L. Klotz - Session 3: Active surveillance: PS...
 
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
POC Breast 1 | 2007 -  	Adjuvant Endocrine TherapyPOC Breast 1 | 2007 -  	Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
 
CANSA The Big 5 Cancers affecting Men in South Africa 2017
CANSA The Big 5 Cancers affecting Men in South Africa 2017CANSA The Big 5 Cancers affecting Men in South Africa 2017
CANSA The Big 5 Cancers affecting Men in South Africa 2017
 
What Services (and Frequencies) Are Deemed Necessary by Patients?
What Services (and Frequencies) Are Deemed Necessary by Patients? What Services (and Frequencies) Are Deemed Necessary by Patients?
What Services (and Frequencies) Are Deemed Necessary by Patients?
 
Pancholy SB 2014
Pancholy SB 2014Pancholy SB 2014
Pancholy SB 2014
 
Module 1 Tom Kirk-LandscapePart1
Module 1 Tom Kirk-LandscapePart1Module 1 Tom Kirk-LandscapePart1
Module 1 Tom Kirk-LandscapePart1
 
Better Understanding of the Epidemiology of Lung Cancer
Better Understanding of the Epidemiology of Lung CancerBetter Understanding of the Epidemiology of Lung Cancer
Better Understanding of the Epidemiology of Lung Cancer
 
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic DiseasePOC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease
POC Breast 1 | 2007 - Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease
 
Saito S DRAGON trial
Saito S DRAGON trialSaito S DRAGON trial
Saito S DRAGON trial
 
Guzman L - AIMRADIAL 2014 - Radiation exposure
Guzman L - AIMRADIAL 2014 - Radiation exposureGuzman L - AIMRADIAL 2014 - Radiation exposure
Guzman L - AIMRADIAL 2014 - Radiation exposure
 

Similar to Localized Prostate Cancer in Puerto Rico

Ca prostate [edmond]
Ca prostate [edmond]Ca prostate [edmond]
Ca prostate [edmond]Edmond Wong
 
Intern talk prostate and testis cancer 2015
Intern talk prostate and testis cancer 2015Intern talk prostate and testis cancer 2015
Intern talk prostate and testis cancer 2015katejohnpunag
 
Approach to a case of localized prostate cancer
Approach to a case of localized prostate cancerApproach to a case of localized prostate cancer
Approach to a case of localized prostate cancerDr Santosh Kumaraswamy
 
diagnosis and outline of management of localized prostate cancer for non-urol...
diagnosis and outline of management of localized prostate cancer for non-urol...diagnosis and outline of management of localized prostate cancer for non-urol...
diagnosis and outline of management of localized prostate cancer for non-urol...Dr Mayank Mohan Agarwal
 
Mon 8-00 Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptx
Mon 8-00   Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptxMon 8-00   Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptx
Mon 8-00 Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptxRonitEnterprises
 
Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01
Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01
Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01zonmbie24456
 
Colorectal Cancer Screening - What does the evidence really say?
Colorectal Cancer Screening - What does the evidence really say?Colorectal Cancer Screening - What does the evidence really say?
Colorectal Cancer Screening - What does the evidence really say?Jarrod Lee
 
Prostate cancer modernising the diagnostic pathway 2013-06-11 by Marc Laniado
Prostate cancer   modernising the diagnostic pathway 2013-06-11 by Marc LaniadoProstate cancer   modernising the diagnostic pathway 2013-06-11 by Marc Laniado
Prostate cancer modernising the diagnostic pathway 2013-06-11 by Marc LaniadoMarc Laniado
 
Strategie di screening del cancro Colorettale - Gastrolearning®
Strategie di screening del cancro Colorettale - Gastrolearning®Strategie di screening del cancro Colorettale - Gastrolearning®
Strategie di screening del cancro Colorettale - Gastrolearning®Gastrolearning
 
Cyber knife in urological malignancies
Cyber knife in urological malignanciesCyber knife in urological malignancies
Cyber knife in urological malignancieselango mk
 
Post Operative RT in Carcinoma prostate
Post Operative RT in Carcinoma prostatePost Operative RT in Carcinoma prostate
Post Operative RT in Carcinoma prostateSreekanth Nallam
 
Chemotherapy in Gynecological malignancies
Chemotherapy in Gynecological malignancies Chemotherapy in Gynecological malignancies
Chemotherapy in Gynecological malignancies Chandan K Das
 

Similar to Localized Prostate Cancer in Puerto Rico (20)

Ca prostate [edmond]
Ca prostate [edmond]Ca prostate [edmond]
Ca prostate [edmond]
 
Intern talk prostate and testis cancer 2015
Intern talk prostate and testis cancer 2015Intern talk prostate and testis cancer 2015
Intern talk prostate and testis cancer 2015
 
Approach to a case of localized prostate cancer
Approach to a case of localized prostate cancerApproach to a case of localized prostate cancer
Approach to a case of localized prostate cancer
 
pca screening.pdf
pca screening.pdfpca screening.pdf
pca screening.pdf
 
diagnosis and outline of management of localized prostate cancer for non-urol...
diagnosis and outline of management of localized prostate cancer for non-urol...diagnosis and outline of management of localized prostate cancer for non-urol...
diagnosis and outline of management of localized prostate cancer for non-urol...
 
carcinoma prostate
carcinoma prostatecarcinoma prostate
carcinoma prostate
 
Mon 8-00 Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptx
Mon 8-00   Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptxMon 8-00   Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptx
Mon 8-00 Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptx
 
Prostate cancer
Prostate cancerProstate cancer
Prostate cancer
 
Prostate cancer - PSA and PSA kinetics
Prostate cancer - PSA and PSA kineticsProstate cancer - PSA and PSA kinetics
Prostate cancer - PSA and PSA kinetics
 
Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01
Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01
Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01
 
CA PROSTATE
CA PROSTATE CA PROSTATE
CA PROSTATE
 
Ca prostate
Ca prostateCa prostate
Ca prostate
 
Colorectal Cancer Screening - What does the evidence really say?
Colorectal Cancer Screening - What does the evidence really say?Colorectal Cancer Screening - What does the evidence really say?
Colorectal Cancer Screening - What does the evidence really say?
 
Prostate cancer modernising the diagnostic pathway 2013-06-11 by Marc Laniado
Prostate cancer   modernising the diagnostic pathway 2013-06-11 by Marc LaniadoProstate cancer   modernising the diagnostic pathway 2013-06-11 by Marc Laniado
Prostate cancer modernising the diagnostic pathway 2013-06-11 by Marc Laniado
 
Protec t trial- Journal club
Protec t trial- Journal clubProtec t trial- Journal club
Protec t trial- Journal club
 
Strategie di screening del cancro Colorettale - Gastrolearning®
Strategie di screening del cancro Colorettale - Gastrolearning®Strategie di screening del cancro Colorettale - Gastrolearning®
Strategie di screening del cancro Colorettale - Gastrolearning®
 
Cyber knife in urological malignancies
Cyber knife in urological malignanciesCyber knife in urological malignancies
Cyber knife in urological malignancies
 
Post Operative RT in Carcinoma prostate
Post Operative RT in Carcinoma prostatePost Operative RT in Carcinoma prostate
Post Operative RT in Carcinoma prostate
 
Prostate Cancer Screening
Prostate Cancer ScreeningProstate Cancer Screening
Prostate Cancer Screening
 
Chemotherapy in Gynecological malignancies
Chemotherapy in Gynecological malignancies Chemotherapy in Gynecological malignancies
Chemotherapy in Gynecological malignancies
 

Recently uploaded

Call Girl Hyderabad Madhuri 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
Call Girl Hyderabad Madhuri 9907093804 Independent Escort Service HyderabadCall Girl Hyderabad Madhuri 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
Call Girl Hyderabad Madhuri 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabaddelhimodelshub1
 
Call Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any TimeCall Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Timedelhimodelshub1
 
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in LucknowRussian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknowgragteena
 
VIP Call Girls Hyderabad Megha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
VIP Call Girls Hyderabad Megha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service HyderabadVIP Call Girls Hyderabad Megha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
VIP Call Girls Hyderabad Megha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabaddelhimodelshub1
 
Gurgaon Sector 90 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few ...
Gurgaon Sector 90 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few ...Gurgaon Sector 90 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few ...
Gurgaon Sector 90 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few ...ggsonu500
 
Kukatpally Call Girls Services 9907093804 High Class Babes Here Call Now
Kukatpally Call Girls Services 9907093804 High Class Babes Here Call NowKukatpally Call Girls Services 9907093804 High Class Babes Here Call Now
Kukatpally Call Girls Services 9907093804 High Class Babes Here Call NowHyderabad Call Girls Services
 
Call Girls Gurgaon Parul 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Gurgaon
Call Girls Gurgaon Parul 9711199012 Independent Escort Service GurgaonCall Girls Gurgaon Parul 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Gurgaon
Call Girls Gurgaon Parul 9711199012 Independent Escort Service GurgaonCall Girls Service Gurgaon
 
VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591
VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591
VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591adityaroy0215
 
hyderabad call girl.pdfRussian Call Girls in Hyderabad Amrita 9907093804 Inde...
hyderabad call girl.pdfRussian Call Girls in Hyderabad Amrita 9907093804 Inde...hyderabad call girl.pdfRussian Call Girls in Hyderabad Amrita 9907093804 Inde...
hyderabad call girl.pdfRussian Call Girls in Hyderabad Amrita 9907093804 Inde...delhimodelshub1
 
Call Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any TimeCall Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Timedelhimodelshub1
 
Russian Call Girls in Goa Samaira 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Goa
Russian Call Girls in Goa Samaira 7001305949 Independent Escort Service GoaRussian Call Girls in Goa Samaira 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Goa
Russian Call Girls in Goa Samaira 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Goanarwatsonia7
 
Low Rate Call Girls In Bommanahalli Just Call 7001305949
Low Rate Call Girls In Bommanahalli Just Call 7001305949Low Rate Call Girls In Bommanahalli Just Call 7001305949
Low Rate Call Girls In Bommanahalli Just Call 7001305949ps5894268
 
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...High Profile Call Girls Chandigarh Aarushi
 
College Call Girls Mumbai Alia 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
College Call Girls Mumbai Alia 9910780858 Independent Escort Service MumbaiCollege Call Girls Mumbai Alia 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
College Call Girls Mumbai Alia 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbaisonalikaur4
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Model Call Girl in Subhash Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Subhash Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Subhash Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Subhash Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Call Girl Hyderabad Madhuri 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
Call Girl Hyderabad Madhuri 9907093804 Independent Escort Service HyderabadCall Girl Hyderabad Madhuri 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
Call Girl Hyderabad Madhuri 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
 
Call Girl Guwahati Aashi 👉 7001305949 👈 🔝 Independent Escort Service Guwahati
Call Girl Guwahati Aashi 👉 7001305949 👈 🔝 Independent Escort Service GuwahatiCall Girl Guwahati Aashi 👉 7001305949 👈 🔝 Independent Escort Service Guwahati
Call Girl Guwahati Aashi 👉 7001305949 👈 🔝 Independent Escort Service Guwahati
 
Call Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any TimeCall Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
 
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in LucknowRussian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
 
VIP Call Girls Hyderabad Megha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
VIP Call Girls Hyderabad Megha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service HyderabadVIP Call Girls Hyderabad Megha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
VIP Call Girls Hyderabad Megha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
 
Gurgaon Sector 90 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few ...
Gurgaon Sector 90 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few ...Gurgaon Sector 90 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few ...
Gurgaon Sector 90 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few ...
 
Call Girls in Lucknow Esha 🔝 8923113531 🔝 🎶 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
Call Girls in Lucknow Esha 🔝 8923113531  🔝 🎶 Independent Escort Service LucknowCall Girls in Lucknow Esha 🔝 8923113531  🔝 🎶 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
Call Girls in Lucknow Esha 🔝 8923113531 🔝 🎶 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
 
Russian Call Girls in Dehradun Komal 🔝 7001305949 🔝 📍 Independent Escort Serv...
Russian Call Girls in Dehradun Komal 🔝 7001305949 🔝 📍 Independent Escort Serv...Russian Call Girls in Dehradun Komal 🔝 7001305949 🔝 📍 Independent Escort Serv...
Russian Call Girls in Dehradun Komal 🔝 7001305949 🔝 📍 Independent Escort Serv...
 
Kukatpally Call Girls Services 9907093804 High Class Babes Here Call Now
Kukatpally Call Girls Services 9907093804 High Class Babes Here Call NowKukatpally Call Girls Services 9907093804 High Class Babes Here Call Now
Kukatpally Call Girls Services 9907093804 High Class Babes Here Call Now
 
Call Girls Gurgaon Parul 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Gurgaon
Call Girls Gurgaon Parul 9711199012 Independent Escort Service GurgaonCall Girls Gurgaon Parul 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Gurgaon
Call Girls Gurgaon Parul 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Gurgaon
 
VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591
VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591
VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591
 
hyderabad call girl.pdfRussian Call Girls in Hyderabad Amrita 9907093804 Inde...
hyderabad call girl.pdfRussian Call Girls in Hyderabad Amrita 9907093804 Inde...hyderabad call girl.pdfRussian Call Girls in Hyderabad Amrita 9907093804 Inde...
hyderabad call girl.pdfRussian Call Girls in Hyderabad Amrita 9907093804 Inde...
 
Call Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any TimeCall Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
 
Call Girl Dehradun Aashi 🔝 7001305949 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Dehradun
Call Girl Dehradun Aashi 🔝 7001305949 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service DehradunCall Girl Dehradun Aashi 🔝 7001305949 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Dehradun
Call Girl Dehradun Aashi 🔝 7001305949 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Dehradun
 
Russian Call Girls in Goa Samaira 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Goa
Russian Call Girls in Goa Samaira 7001305949 Independent Escort Service GoaRussian Call Girls in Goa Samaira 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Goa
Russian Call Girls in Goa Samaira 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Goa
 
Low Rate Call Girls In Bommanahalli Just Call 7001305949
Low Rate Call Girls In Bommanahalli Just Call 7001305949Low Rate Call Girls In Bommanahalli Just Call 7001305949
Low Rate Call Girls In Bommanahalli Just Call 7001305949
 
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...
 
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Isha 🔝 9719455033 🔝 🎶 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Isha 🔝 9719455033 🔝 🎶 Independent Escort Service LucknowVIP Call Girls Lucknow Isha 🔝 9719455033 🔝 🎶 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Isha 🔝 9719455033 🔝 🎶 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
 
College Call Girls Mumbai Alia 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
College Call Girls Mumbai Alia 9910780858 Independent Escort Service MumbaiCollege Call Girls Mumbai Alia 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
College Call Girls Mumbai Alia 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
 

Localized Prostate Cancer in Puerto Rico

  • 1. Localized Prostate Cancer in Puerto Rico Ricardo F. Sánchez-Ortiz, MD Assistant Professor of Urology University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine Adjunct Assistant Professor of Urology The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Partnership in Cancer Research
  • 2. Disclosures • Intuitive Surgical – Robotic surgery proctor – Robotic surgery course faculty • No stock ownership
  • 3.
  • 4. Early Detection • Who should be screened? • Who should be biopsied? –At what PSA? • How should we biopsy?
  • 5.
  • 6. PLCO trial. NEJM 2009 • 76,693 men • Screening vs. no screening – Ages 55 to 75 yrs. • Followed with PSA for 6 yrs • No difference in survival • Problem: – Screening vs. “partial screening”
  • 7. PLCO: 80% of Control Group Participants had at least 1 PSA during the trial Shoag et al. NEJM 2016
  • 8. European Randomized Study for Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) • 182,160 men • Screening versus no screening – Ages 55 to 69 • F/U: 16 years • 21% lower mortality – 29% after adjusting non-compliance Shroder et al, N Engl J Med. 2012
  • 9. Goteborg Trial • 20,000 men • Randomized 1:1 – PSA Screening vs. no screening every 2 yrs • Ages 50 to 69 yrs • Risk reduction of prostate cancer death by almost 50% Hugosson et al, Lancet Oncol, 2010
  • 10. AUA guidelines 2013 • Every two years between 55 and 70 • Except African American or first degree family history
  • 11. What is a “normal” PSA?
  • 12. Normal 3.67 ng/ml 0.00 – 4.00 ng/ml Juan del Pueblo
  • 13.
  • 14. NCCN: biopsy if > 3 ng/ml
  • 15. PSA Between Median and 2.5 ng/ml Age range Median Prostate cancer risk 40 – 49 0.7 ng/ml 14.6-fold 50 – 59 0.9 ng/ml 7.6-fold • Higher Gleason scores • Higher rate of biochemical progression Urology: 67(2): 316-20, 2006
  • 16. Prostate Cancer Gene 3 PCA3 • Gene that expresses non- coding RNA in human prostate tissue • Highly over-expressed in PCa • Post-DRE first voided urine specimen • Lower sensitivity, higher specificity than PSA
  • 17. Prostate Health Index (phi) • NCCN • Combination of: – Free PSA – Total PSA – p2PSA
  • 18. PHI Performance Characteristics X3 more specific than serum PSA -may help with active surveillance -more likely to predict higher grade tumors
  • 19.
  • 20. • NCCN • Four Kallikreins – Total PSA – Free PSA – Intact PSA – Human Kallikrein 2 (hk2)
  • 21. Prostate biopsy • Transrectal ultrasound • Local anesthesia or sedation • NCCN guidelines – 12 or more cores – Now standard of care
  • 22. Multiparametric MRI • MRI-Ultrasound fusion • Visual estimation
  • 23. Multiparametric Prostate MRI • PIRADS 1 • PIRADS 2 • PIRADS 3 • PIRADS 4 • PIRADS 5
  • 25.
  • 27. MRI-guided biopsy with Visual Estimation Overall Detection Rate 71.8% 56.3% 50.0% 6.2% 9.4% 25.0% 37.5% 40.6% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Standard 12- core only MRI guided nodule biopsy only Standard 12-core and MR guided nodule biopsy Negative ASAP or HGPIN Positive n=80
  • 28. MRI-guided biopsy with Visual Estimation Detection rate by Gleason Score 46.8% 56.3% 50.0% 6.2% 9.4% 15.6% 9.4% 9.4% 31.2% 31.2% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Standard 12- core only MRI guided nodule biopsy only Standard 12-core and MR guided nodule biopsy Negative ASAP or HGPIN Grade group 1 (gleason 6) Grade group 2 or higher 6.3% n=80
  • 29. ISUP/WHO New Grading System • Grade 1: Gleason score 6 (3+3) • Grade 2: Gleason score 7 (3+4) • Grade 3: Gleason score 7 (4+3) • Grade 4: Gleason score 8 • Grade 5: Gleason score 9 - 10.
  • 30. Increase in PCa Aggressiveness • Patients divided into three groups to compare clinical and pathological variables over time • SPSS was used for statistical analysis A 2007-2009 B 2010-2012 C 2013-2015 119 323 277
  • 31. PSA and Clinical Stage over Time 5.2 5.9 6.57 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2007-20092010-20122013-2015 serum PSA (ng/dL) 16.0% 26.6% 36.5% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% Clinical Stage > T1c (%) P<0.05 P<0.0001 N=791
  • 32. Gleason Score over Time 37.0% 37.0% 65.7% 12.6% 13.0% 20.2% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2007-2009 2010-2012 2013-2015 GS ≥7 on Biopsy Primary Gleason Grade 4 on Biopsy N=791 P<0.05
  • 33. Cancer Volume on Biopsy over Time 5.2 8.4 9.6 3.6 4 4.9 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2007-2009 2010-2012 2013-2015 Total Sum of Cancer Cores per Lobe (mm) Largest Positive Tumor Core per Lobe (mm) N=791 P<0.01 P<0.01
  • 34. Use of Robotic RP over Time 51.3% 93.2% 100.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 2007-2009 2010-2012 2013-2015 N=791P<0.001 A 2007-2009 B 2010-2012 C 2013-2015 119 323 277
  • 35. Prostate Cancer Mortality in PR Puerto Rico 2006 – 2010 27.3 per 100,000
  • 37. High BMI increases Risk of High Risk CaP on Biopsy • Liang et al, J Urol 2014 – CCF • 3,258 SELECT trial participants – 29.3% obese • Without FHx: obesity ñrisk of Gleason ≥ 7 (OR 2.31) • With FHx: obesity ñ overall risk (3.73) and ñrisk of Gleason ≥7 (7.95)
  • 38. BMI Cohort Characteristics Puerto Rican Prostate Cancer 35.4% (20% higher than SELECT trial)
  • 39. Risk of Gleason Score ≥ 7 or Extraprostatic Disease *p < 0.05 N=791
  • 40. Biopsy is positive…Now what? Staging studies rarely needed
  • 41. Staging • Bone scan – PSA > 20 – Abnormal DRE and PSA > 10 – Gleason score >7 – T3/T4 – Symptoms • MRI – T3, T4 – LN involvement probability > 10% CT scan for local staging not as useful
  • 42. Organ-confined Prostate Cancer • Active surveillance/watchful waiting • Surgery – Open – Robotic – Cryoablation • Radiation therapy – External beam – Radioactive Seeds
  • 43. Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Randomized Trial • 695 men – watchful waiting or radical prostatectomy • After 8 years: –50% ↓ cancer-specific mortality • 7% versus 14% –50% ↓ distant metastasis • 13% versus 27% Holmberg N Engl J Med. 2002
  • 44. < 65 y/o observation
  • 45. PIVOT trial • VA Hospital study. NEJM 2012 – 700 pts. 10 year follow-up • Surgery vs. Observation • Surgery only benefitted: – Gleason 7 or PSA > 10 • Conclusions: – Men > 60 with low grade, PSA < 10 should be observed
  • 46. PIVOT trial • Problems: • Elderly, infirmed cohort: mean age 67 yrs • 40% were dead at 10 years of all causes • Only 10% below age 60 yrs.
  • 47. Organ-confined Prostate Cancer • Active surveillance/watchful waiting • Surgery – Open – Robotic – Cryoablation • Radiation therapy – External beam – Radioactive Seeds
  • 48. Low risk prostate cancer Less than 65 Surgical candidate? No Not surgical candidate or not accepting risks Brachytherapy or EBRT Cryoablation Active surveillance Yes Surgery 65 or older Active surveillance (1st choice) Others Surgery (not willing to accept risks) Radiation Brachytherapy External Radiation Cryoablation
  • 49. Ideal Candidate • Age > 65 • ≤ 2 positive cores • Gleason 6 only • Less than 50% core length involved • Normal volume-adjusted PSA • PSA velocity before diagnosis < 2 ng/ml/yr • No perineural invasion • Free PSA > 15% • NORMAL mMRI • Low genomic score
  • 50.
  • 51. Low risk prostate cancer Less than 65 Surgical candidate? No Not surgical candidate or not accepting risks Active surveillance Brachytherapy or EBRT CryoablationYes Surgery 65 or older Active surveillance (1st choice) Others Surgery (not willing to accept risks) Radiation Brachytherapy External Radiation Cryoablation
  • 52. Intermediate to High risk prostate cancer Less than 70 Surgical candidate? No Not surgical candidate or not accepting risks External radiation and Androgen Deprivation Yes Surgery 70 to 80 yrs Life expectancy > 10 years? Yes External radiation and Androgen Deprivation UC, Crohn’s, prior RT Surgery or Cryoablation No Watchful waiting > 80 years Watchful waiting
  • 53. Intermediate to High risk prostate cancer Less than 70 Surgical candidate? No Not surgical candidate or not accepting risks External radiation and Androgen Deprivation Yes Surgery 70 to 80 yrs Life expectancy > 10 years? Yes External radiation and Androgen Deprivation UC, Crohn’s, prior RT Surgery or Cryoablation No Watchful waiting > 80 years Watchful waiting
  • 54. Organ-confined Prostate Cancer • Active surveillance/watchful waiting • Surgery – Open – Laparoscopic/Robotic – Cryoablation • Radiation therapy – IGRT – Proton therapy – Brachytherapy
  • 55.
  • 56. Open (n=154) Robotic (n= 930) P value Days with catheter Median 11.7 (8 to 21) Median 8.1 (5 to 15) 0.0001 OR time 176 min Median: 175 167 min Median: 170 no difference Blood loss 566 (150 to 1300) 143 (20 – 700) < 0.0001 Blood transfusions 2.5% (4 pt) 0.004% (4 pt) <0.0001 Open Conversion 2/930
  • 57. Early Complications • Rectal injury – Robotic: 0/930 – Open: 2/154 • Ileus: – Robotic: 2.7% (25/930) – Open: 3.2% (5/154) • P = 0.09. • Prolonged urine leak: – Robotic: 0.8% (8/930) – Open: 2.6% (4/154) • DVT – Robotic: 0.004% (4/930) – Open: 1.2% (2/154) • Stroke – 1 robotic
  • 58. Late Complications 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 4 3.9% Robotic Open • Hernia – Robotic: 2.7% (25/930) – Open: 0.06% (1/154) • P= 0.06 • Robotic – Orchitis • Bladder neck contracture/Stricture – Robotic: 1.2% (11/930) – Open: 7.7% (12/154) • P = 0.0001 p = 0.54 N =306 N =154
  • 59. Positive surgical margins 0 5 10 15 20 25 9.0 6.8 p = 0.13 National average ~ 15.7% Patel et al. J Urol, 186(2):511-6, 2011
  • 60. Urinary Continence Free of pads > 12 months follow-up 89.1% 92.1% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Open Robotic *p = 0.04107/120N= 69/72
  • 61.
  • 64. Double Layer Anterior Anastomosis
  • 65. Double Layer Anterior Anastomosis
  • 69. Bilateral Nerve Sparing Having Intercourse with or without PDE5I (If fully potent preoperatively) *p = 0.51 N= 75 N= 101 Median f/u 35 mo 10 mo
  • 70. Risk of ED after 1 year Multivariate Analysis P<0.001 OR: 3.30 95% CI: 1.54 to 7.11 P<0.001 OR: 5.02 (if ≥60g) 95% CI 1.88 to 13.4 P<0.02 OR: 3.34 95% CI: 1.25 to 8.89
  • 71. Adjuvant vs. Salvage Radiation • Criteria: T3a/T3b or +SM, N0 • EORTC 22911 trial – 1005 patients. 5 year median follow-up – 60 Gy • SWOG 8764 trial, 2009 – 473 men T3 disease. 10 year median follow-up – 60 to 64 Gy
  • 72. SWOG 8764 Salvage vs. Adjuvant Radiation Radiation No radiation Risk of recurrence 35% 65% Risk of metastasis at 10 years 8% 17%
  • 73. EORTC 22911 – 5-yr PSA-free survival • 74% versus 52% – Grade 3 -4 toxicity • 4.2% vs. 2.6% at 5 years
  • 74. SWOG 8764’ Salvage vs. Adjuvant Radiation Improved metastasis-free and overall survival Thompson et al, J Urol March 2009 Metastasis-free survival Overall survival
  • 75. Radiation therapy Secondary Malignancies • Overall risk: 1/290 • After 10 years: – Risk: 1/70
  • 76. customersupport@genomedx.com | www.genomedx.com Patient Details Patient Name: Pedro Saade Llorens Medical Record Number: not provided Date of Birth: 06/12/1945 Date of Prostatectomy: 01/23/2016 Pathology Laboratory: San Pablo PathologyGroup Pathologist: Juan Serrano-Olmo, MD, FCAP Address: 68 CII Santa Cruz Torre San Pablo Suite 403-404, Bayamon, PR 00957, USA Order Information Order Date: 10/03/2016 Specimen Received Date: 11/04/2016 GenomeDx Accession ID: MC-014608 Specimen ID: 16SP824-B Ordering Physician: Sanchez Ortiz, Ricardo F Clinic/Hospital Name: Robotic Urology& Oncology Institute Clinic/Hospital Address: 400 FD Roosevelt Suite 306, San Juan, PR 00918-0000, USA Clinical Details: Preoperative PSA (ng/mL): N/A Gleason Score: 4+3 SM+ EPE SVI LNI BCR Tertiary Gleason 5 Other: Lymphovascular Invasion 9.4% 8.0% Your Decipher Result - Genomic High Risk Decipher Score 0.60 Risk - Percent Likelihood 5-Year Metastasis 10-Year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality Interpretation Clinical studies concluded that Decipher high risk men with adverse pathology have a poor prognosis overall. These men may benefit from adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy and consideration for clinical trials. Relevant findings from published clinical studies: Patients with Decipher high risk had 77% 5-year metastasis free survival and 70% 10-year cause specific survival. For these patients there was improved metastasis-free survival favoring adjuvant and early salvage postoperative radiotherapy. In patients with PSA rise or biochemical recurrence after surgery that received salvage radiotherapy, only 66.5% remained metastasis free after 5 years. Decipher Post-Operative Report *Average clinical risk refers to the average cohort risk of metastasis at 5 years post radical prostatectomy. The average cumulative incidence of metastasis was 6.0%at 5 years post radicalprostatectomy, as reported by Karnes et al., 2013 from analysis of a cohort of 1,010 men with intermediate and high risk clinical features who received radical prostatectomy as first line treatment at the Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2006. Five-year probability of metastasis endpoint: Decipher uses the genomic risk score to predict the 5-year probability of metastasis from the time of radical prostatectomy. Probabilities were generated from a Cox proportional hazards model based upon a cohort of 1,010 men with intermediate and high risk clinical features with a median 6.9 years of followup. Decipher had an AUC of 0.76-0.85 in multiple clinical validation studies for prediction of metastasis. Percent likelihood for this endpoint ranges from 0.3-67%. Ten-year probability of prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM) endpoint: Decipher uses the genomic risk score to predict the 10-year probability of PCSMfrom the time of radical prostatectomy. Probabilities are generated from a logistic regression analysis based upon a cohort of 557 patients with 112 prostate cancer deaths within 10 years post radical prostatectomy. These probabilities are adjusted for a PCSMcumulative incidence of 5%at 10 years post radical prostatectomy. All non-PCSMpatients in the study had at least 10 years of follow-up. Decipher had an AUC of 0.72 in predicting PCSM. Percent likelihood for this endpoint ranges from 0.7-30.5%. POST OP DecipherScore 1.00 High Risk 0.60 Avg.* Risk 0.45 Low Risk 0.00 1-3 4-6 1,2 4-6 4 References on reverse 1 1 1-8 9 2,7,8 Your Decipher Score GenomeDx Biosciences Laboratory 10355 Science Center Dr. Suite 240, San Diego, CA92121 Tel: 1-888-792-1601 | Fax: 1-855-324-2768 customersupport@genomedx.com | www.genomedx.com Patient Details Patient Name: Pedro Saade Llorens Medical Record Number: not provided Date of Birth: 06/12/1945 Date of Prostatectomy: 01/23/2016 Pathology Laboratory: San Pablo PathologyGroup Pathologist: Juan Serrano-Olmo, MD, FCAP Address: 68 CII Santa Cruz Torre San Pablo Suite 403-404, Bayamon, PR 00957, USA Order Information Order Date: 10/03/2016 Specimen Received Date: 11/04/2016 GenomeDx Accession ID: MC-014608 Specimen ID: 16SP824-B Ordering Physician: Sanchez Ortiz, Ricardo F Clinic/Hospital Name: Robotic Urology& Oncology Institute Clinic/Hospital Address: 400 FD Roosevelt Suite 306, San Juan, PR 00918-0000, USA Clinical Details: Preoperative PSA (ng/mL): N/A Gleason Score: 4+3 SM+ EPE SVI LNI BCR Tertiary Gleason 5 Other: Lymphovascular Invasion 9.4% 8.0% Your Decipher Result - Genomic High Risk Decipher Score 0.60 Risk - Percent Likelihood 5-Year Metastasis 10-Year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality Interpretation Clinical studies concluded that Decipher high risk men with adverse pathology have a poor prognosis overall. These men may benefit from adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy and consideration for clinical trials. Relevant findings from published clinical studies: Patients with Decipher high risk had 77% 5-year metastasis free survival and 70% 10-year cause specific survival. For these patients there was improved metastasis-free survival favoring adjuvant and early salvage postoperative radiotherapy. Decipher Post-Operative Report POST OP DecipherScore 1.00 High Risk 0.60 Avg.* Risk 0.45 Low Risk 1-3 4-6 1,2 4-6 Your Decipher Score DocuSign Envelope ID: BC1F6A69-5EFD-4C0D-822E-0779A9BCF451
  • 77. Organ-confined Prostate Cancer • Active surveillance/watchful waiting • Surgery – Open – Laparoscopic/Robotic – Cryoablation • Radiation therapy – IGRT – Proton therapy – Brachytherapy
  • 79. Brachytherapy • Gleason 6, PSA <10, T1c • Less than 50% of cores positive • No perineural invasion • PSA before diagnosis < 2 ng/ml/yr. • Feasibility: – Volume < 70 cc , > 25 cc – No voiding symptoms – No previous TURP
  • 80. External Beam Radiotherapy IMRT - IGRT 75.6 Gy conform to PTV c Effect of Organ ariability Original Plan on New CT
  • 81. Fiducial Markers • Electromagnetic transponders • 4D localization system • Motion shifts continuously monitored • No extra radiation used Calypso ©
  • 82. Case: C.R. • 53 y/o • PSA: 3.5 ng/ml • DRE: Bilateral SV and R extraprostatic (T3a, T3b) • Prostate: 50 grams • Patient weight: 310 pounds IMRT plus androgen deprivation
  • 83. Randomized Trial RT vs. RT+ADT D’Amico. JAMA 2008
  • 84. Clínica Las Américas Suite 306, Hato Rey 787-756-5200