2. Forward Looking Information
2
This presentation contains forward-looking information under Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the development
potential and timetable of the projects; the Company’s ability to raise additional funds as necessary or on commercially reasonable terms; the future price of gold; the estimation of mineral
resources and mineral reserves; conclusions of economic evaluation (including scoping studies); the realization of mineral resource and reserve estimates; the timing and amount of estimated
future production, development and exploration; costs of future activities; capital and operating expenditures; success of exploration activities; mining or processing issues; currency exchange
rates; government regulation of mining operations; and environmental risks. Generally, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”,
“expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or
statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of
management as of the date such statements are made. Estimates regarding the anticipated timing, amount and cost of mining at the projects are based on assumptions underlying mineral
resource estimates and the realization of such estimates; results of previous mining activities at the projects, and detailed research and analysis completed by independent of the Company;
research and estimates regarding the timing of delivery for long-lead items; knowledge regarding the factors consultants and management involved in building a mine and other factors described
in the technical reports and Annual Information Form filed under the profile of the Company on SEDAR. Capital and operating cost estimates are based on results of previous mining activities,
research of the Company and independent consultants, recent estimates of construction and mining costs and other factors that are set out in the scoping study. Production estimates are based
on mine plans and production schedules, which have been developed by the Company’s personnel and independent consultants. Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by
such forward-looking information, including but not limited to risks related to: timing and availability of external financing on acceptable terms; unexpected events and delays during construction,
expansion and start-up; variations in ore grade and recovery rates; receipt and revocation of government approvals; actual results of exploration and mining activities; changes in project parameters
as plans continue to be refined; future prices of gold; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry. Although
management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other
factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ
materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-
looking information except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
Investors are advised that National Instrument NI 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators requires that each category of mineral reserves and mineral resources be reported
separately. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Due to the uncertainty of measured, indicated or inferred mineral resources, these mineral
resources may never be upgraded to proven and probable mineral reserves.
Certain information contained herein may be considered to be future-oriented financial information, which was designed and approved by management of Crocodile Gold for the purposes of
assessing the value of the acquisition. Readers are cautioned that such information may not be appropriate for their use, and readers should consult their financial advisors as appropriate.
Bill Nielsen P.Geo.,Vice President of Exploration at Crocodile Gold, is a “qualified person” as such term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the technical
information and data included in this presentation
This presentation is being made available on a confidential basis only to persons in the United States reasonably believed to be “accredited investors” as defined in Rule 501(a) under the U.S.
Securities Act (“Accredited Investors”) and specifically authorized to view this presentation. This information does not constitute an offer to any other person or, a general offer to the public of, or the
general solicitation from the public of, offers to subscribe or purchase any of securities of Crocodile Gold Corp. . Any unauthorized use of the presentation is strictly prohibited. Distribution of this
information to any person is unauthorized, and any disclosure of any of such information without the prior written consent of Crocodile Gold is prohibited. Except as specifically provided herein, this
presentation may not be copied or otherwise distributed, in whole or in part, by or to any person or in any medium whatsoever.
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated or Inferred Resources
The information presented uses the terms “measured”, “indicated” and “inferred” mineral resources. United States investors are advised that while such terms are recognized and required by
Canadian regulations, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize these terms. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their
existence, and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules,
estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or
indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. United States investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists, or is
economically or legally mineable.
3. Cautionary Notes
3
Non-IFRS Measures
Crocodile Gold believes that investors use certain indicators to assess gold mining companies. The indicators are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards.
“Cash Cost per Ounce” is a non-IFRS performance measure which could provide an indication of the mining and processing efficiency at the operations. It is determined by dividing the operating
expenses, excluding stock-based compensation allocated to the operating expense and next of silver revenue, by the number of ounces of gold sold. There are variations in the method of
computation of “cash cost per ounce” as determined by the Company compared with other mining companies. For more detail on Cash Cost per Ounce determination for Crocodile Gold, please
visit www.sedar.com or www.crocgold.com and review the latest Annual Financial Statements issued on March 19, 2012.
Note for Pages 7, 8, and 19 : For information regarding mineral resource and reserve estimates, including parameters used to generate the estimates and depletion, please see the technical
reports titled: REPORT ON THE MINERAL RESOURCES & MINERAL RESERVES OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY GOLD AND BASE METALS PROPERTIES FOR CROCODILE GOLD
CORP. dated April 4th, 2011; NI43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT FOSTERVILLE GOLD MINE, VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA PREPARED FOR CROCODILE GOLD CORP dated April 29th, 2012; NI43-
101 TECHNICAL REPORT STAWELL GOLD MINE, VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA PREPARED FOR CROCODILE GOLD CORP dated April 9th, 2012. These documents are available on the company
website and at www.sedar.com.
Non-GAAP Measures
Crocodile Gold believes that investors use certain indicators to assess gold mining companies. The indicators are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards.
“Cash cost per ounce” is a non-GAAP performance measure that could provide an indication of the mining and processing efficiency and effectiveness at the operations. It is determined by dividing
the operating expenses, excluding stock-based compensation allocated to operating expenses and net of silver revenue, by the number of ounces of gold sold. There are variations in the method
of computation of “cash cost per ounce” as determined by the Company compared with other mining companies. The following is a reconciliation of the cash cost per ounce of gold sold, to the
reported operating expenses for the three months ended December 31, September 30, June 30 and March 31, 2012:
Dec 30 Sept 30 June 30 March 31
Operating expenses per consolidated statement of operations
and comprehensive income (loss) 59,645,459 55,557,277 41,720,288 22,405,959
By-product silver sales credit (203,303) (126,723) (105,871) (64,137)
Non-cash stock option expense charged to operating
expenses
- - - (240,861)
Operating cash costs 59,442,156 55,430,554 41,614,417 22,100,961
Divided by ounces of gold sold 59,541 47,121 35,665 10,900
Cash cost per ounce ($ per ounce) 998 1,176 1,167 2,028
4. Investment Highlights
4
GROWING GOLD
PRODUCTION
GROWING CASH
FLOW
EXPLORATION
UPSIDE
Cash flow from operation in Q4 2012: ~$39
million
Expect free cash flow of ~ $200 million over
next five years
Extensive exploration and development
pipeline
Outstanding potential to discover additional
resources
Production increased from 68,016 oz in 2011
to 155,023 oz in 2012
2013 production expected to be 175,000 oz
COMPELLING
VALUATION
Undervalued compared to peers at 0.3x P/NAV
with a peer group median of 0.7x
EV/oz of $25 compared to peer group median
of $52
All within
Australia – a
first world
country with
one of the
most mining
friendly
jurisdictions
5. Crocodile Gold Exceeds Gold Production
Targets with 155,523 ounces in 2012
5
2013 Growing Production From :
Continued optimization at Cosmo Mine – improving mine design, increasing extraction
rate, lowering mining cost.
Optimization of Fosterville operation with expansion of resources and reserve base.
Advancement of Big Hill Project – proceeding with permitting and final design with
potential for production in 2014.
2012 Cost Guidance
$1,100 - $1,300
Average for 2012: $1,166$2,028
$1,167 $1,176
$998
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2012 Cash Costs
Average Cash Costs of $1,166 in line with 2012 Guidance
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
OuncesPerQuarter
2012 Ounce Production
CRK Total CRK Proforma w/ NAVCO assets
6. 6
Growing Gold Production:
Double Digit Annual Growth
Growing Production Profile
Existing Operations: Cosmo & Fosterville
Mines
Near-term project: Big Hill*
Longer term: UR-Prospect & Maud Creek
Potential for 14MM tonnes milled and in
excess of 1.2Moz recovered over 5 years
Key Financial Indicators (cumulative-US$)
Revenue: $2.018 Billion
EBITDA: $765 Million
Free Cash Flow: $205 Million
Average cash cost: ~ $875/ounce
5 YEAR PLAN
*Please refer to cautionary notes on page 12 for PEA disclosures
7. 7
Growing Gold Production:
Cosmo Mine
Steady development rate reached in 2012
Commercial production declared March 1st 2013
Ramping-up to produce an average of 75,000 to
90,000oz gold per year
Delineation program in progress with 4
underground drills targeting expansion of Mineral
Resources
Proven and Probable Reserves* of 3.1Mt at 4.2 g/t
Au for 420,000oz
Measured and Indicated Resources* of 5.3Mt at 4.6
g/t Au for 776,000 oz
*Please refer to cautionary notes on page 3 of this presentation
Northern Territory 2012 Performance
Ore Milled (Tonnes) 917,202
Average Grade (g/t Au) 1.51
Recovery(%) 91.6
Gold Produced (Ounces) 40,731
Gold Sold (Ounces) 39,459
Cosmo Mine is part of Crocodile Gold’s Northern Territory
Complex which also includes a number of small open pits
that are currently not being mined. Cosmo is an all–season
underground operation located approximately 60km
northwest of Union Reefs Mill .
8. 8
Growing Gold Production:
Fosterville Gold Mine
Produced 90,000 oz gold in 2012
Expect to produce similar level in 2013
Announced high-grade gold intersections from drill
holes on strike extending the Phoenix ore body at
Fosterville. Drill results include*:
23.36 g/t Au over 5.70m in hole UDE084
6.21 g/t Au over 6.10m in hole UDE084A
Current mine life of 3 years based on Measured
and Indicated Resources of 13.9Mt at 2.9 g/t Au
for 1,289,000 oz
Drilling programs underway with potential to
extend the mine life
Fosterville Processing Facility
Fosterville 2012 Performance
Ore Milled (Tonnes) 786,571
Average Grade (g/t Au) 4.36
Recovery (%) 81.8
Gold Produced (Ounces) 90,440
Gold Sold (Ounces) 90,862
Fosterville Gold Mine is an underground operation located
150 km north of Melbourne and 20 km from Bendigo;
accessible by all weather roads. The mine has been
producing since 1992 with its own processing facility
(capacity of 800 Ktpa) with a bacterial oxidation process
using BIOX technology
*Please refer to press release dated August 30, 2012 for full technical disclosures
9. 9
Growing Gold Production
Stawell Gold Mine
Stawell Gold mine is an underground operation located
alongside the town of Stawell, in central Victoria,
approximately 250 km west of Melbourne. Processing
facilities use standard CIL gold recover and have a capacity
of 1.0MM TPA
Stawell Processing Facility
Produced 73,000 oz Au in 2012
Confirmed opportunity to economically treat
historical surface stockpile until mid 2014
Decision to ramp-down underground mining
activities by mid 2013
Next Steps
Exploring opportunities within the existing
mining lease
Engagement with local stakeholders and
community Stawell 2012 Performance
Ore Milled (Tonnes) 850,017
Average Grade (g/t Au) 3.06
Recovery(%) 86.1
Gold Produced (Ounces) 72,602
Gold Sold (Ounces) 74,552
11. 11
2013
OBJECTIVES
Exploration and Projects
Increase reserves from 1.1MM oz to 1.5MM oz
Consolidate land position in the Northern Territory
through divestment of non-core assets
Advance the Big Hill Project in the State of Victoria
Advance Maud Creek, Union Reefs and Pine Creek Projects
in the Northern Territory Complex
12. 12
Big Hill Project
The Big Hill Deposit is the surface expression of the
Stawell deposit. It currently has Indicated Resources of
2.83 million tonnes at 1.84 g/t Au for 167,000 oz*. South
Gandy’s
Big Hill Pit
Description Unit Open Pit
Strip ratio 3.4 to 1
Ore production Mt 2.3
Grade g/t 1,65
Recovered ounces oz 108,531
Revenue AUD$(mm) 153
LOM Capital AUD$(mm) 21.7
NPV ($1,400/oz, 10% DR) AUD$(mm) 39.6
Exploration and Projects:
State of Victoria
Project Plan
NI 43-101 compliant Preliminary Economic
Assessment (PEA) completed
Ore would be treated at the existing
Stawell Gold Mine mill
Estimated 4 ½ years of operation
2013 Milestones
Start Permitting process
Production to commence second half of
2014
*Please refer to cautionary language on page 3 of this presentation
The PEA is preliminary in nature and is based on a number of assumptions that may be changed in the
future as additional information becomes available. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do
not have demonstrated economic viability. The PEA includes inferred mineral resources that are
considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would
enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized
Stawell Mill
Big Hill Project
13. 13
Maud Creek Project
Located near the town of Katherine, Maud Creek is a partial
refractory ore deposit
Union
Reefs Mill
Prospect
Maud Creek
International
Moline
Exploration and Projects:
Northern Territory Complex
Desktop Scoping Study completed in Q4 2012
Applicability of Fosterville BIOX® technology confirmed
Open pit to be followed by underground operation
Ore would be treated at existing Union Reefs mill in
separate circuit
Preliminary mine design identified the opportunity of
producing approximately 300,000 ounces over 6 years
2013 Milestones
Proceed with Prefeasibility Study including:
additional drilling to capture detailed metallurgical and
geotechnical information
Initial community engagement and existing Environmental
Impact Study update
2014 Development Decision
14. 14
Union Reefs – Prospect Deposit
The Prospect Deposit is located within 1 km of existing
infrastructure with historical production treated at the
Union Reefs mill
* Refer to Oct 13, 2011, Jan 20, 2012 and May 9, 2012 press releases for detailed results
Union Reefs, Prospect
and Crosscourse
Union North
Lady Alice
Union
Reefs Mill
Complex
Prospect
Crosscourse
Exploration and Projects:
Northern Territory Complex
Completed a 11,500 m drilling program; key
exploration results include*:
Prospect: 4.2 m@27g/t Au, 2.5 m@240g/t Au
Crosscourse: 181.2 m@1.8 g/t Au, 12.3 m@8.9 g/t Au
Desktop study completed in 2012 identified the
opportunity of producing approximately 60,000
ounces over 3 years from Prospect
2013 Milestones
Proceed with Phase II – Underground exploration
decline for Prospect with Bulk Sampling
2014 Production Decision
15. Capital Structure
15
Share Structure & Financial Details
(At March 30, 2013)
Basic: 406.4 Million
Warrants: 46.56 Million
Options: 029.8 Million
Fully Diluted: 483.73 Million
Market Capitalization: $93.4 Million
52 Week Trading Range $0.23 – $0.56
Cash Position $23 Million
Debt Outstanding $44.6 Million
52 Week Share Price Performance
In February 2012, Luxor Capital completed a bid to take up a majority ownership of Crocodile Gold. Since that time,
Luxor has assisted the Company in many ways including:
Participation on a pro-rata basis in the last private placement financing
Facilitation of the Victorian assets acquisition as well as aiding in arrangement of the Credit Suisse facility
Luxor is very active in the management and oversight of the Company with 2 current board members. Luxor has also
indicated interest for any future financings – It currently owns 61% of Crocodile Gold.
Major Shareholder – Luxor Capital
Debt outstanding includes recently issued convertible debenture of $34.5 million and
$11.1 million remaining on Credit Suisse secured debt facility
$0.00
$0.10
$0.20
$0.30
$0.40
$0.50
$0.60
16. 16
Company Valuation
Add bullets
$52.70
$25.61
$0.00
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00
$200.00
TGZ OGC EDV RSG BAA Median GSC JAG SBM ORA CRK
1.0x
0.8x 0.8x 0.8x 0.7x 0.7x
0.6x
0.6x
0.3x 0.3x
RSG TGZ OGC SBM GSC JAG EDV BAA ORA CRK
Gold Producer P/NAV Multiples
Source: Bloomberg and company disclosure.
Economic Value is equal to market cap less cash plus debt plus minority interest
and preferred equity
Gold Producers Economic Value/Oz
Source: Consensus Estimates, Bloomberg.
Per ounce, Crocodile Gold is valued at $25.61 – significantly less than the peer median of
$52.70 per ounce, yet production profiles of the peer group are similar.
Crocodile Gold is trading at 0.3x its Net Asset Value which suggests that the full value of
the Company’s projects are not being attributed to in the current share price. The median
P/NAV of the peer group is 0.7x
17. Mineral Resources
and Reserves *
17
Tonnes Au Grade Au
(MM) (g/t) (Koz)
Proven & Probable Reserves
Cosmo 3.1 4.2 420
Fosterville 2.4 4.7 365
Pine Creek 3.0 1.7 162
Stawell 1.0 3.4 107
Burnside 1.6 1.5 80
Reserves 11.1 3.2 1,134
Measured and Indicated Resources (incl. of Reserves)
Fosterville 13.9 2.9 1,289
Maud Creek 9.3 3.1 935
Cosmo 5.3 4.6 776
Mt Bundy 20.2 1.0 665
Burnside 11.3 1.4 493
Stawell 4.7 2.6 399
Pine Creek 5.5 1.6 289
Union Reefs 0.2 2.4 18
M&I Resources 70.5 2.1 4,863
Inferred Resources
Cosmo 5.7 3.7 676
Burnside 13.0 1.5 647
Fosterville 5.0 2.9 477
Mt Bundy 10.5 1.0 351
Union Reefs 3.7 1.7 204
Pine Creek 2.3 2.4 183
Stawell 1.0 4.7 145
Maud Creek 1.1 2.4 82
Inferred Resources 42.4 2.0 2,765
*Please refer to cautionary language on page 3 of this presentation
Crocodile Gold maintains
significant Measured and
Indicated Resources of
over 4 million ounces
and Inferred Resources of
2.7 million ounces.
Reserves for Crocodile
Gold’s projects total
approximately
1.1 million ounces.
18. Why Invest in Crocodile Gold
18
Crocodile Gold has Growing Production
Doubled production over 2011, with 155,523 oz produced
2012 production targets were exceeded
Production is expected to increase 10-15% in 2013, putting the company in an
exclusive group of producers
Crocodile Gold has Cash Flow
Mine operations generated Net Cash Flow of ~ $60mm in 2012.
Expect EBITDA of $765mm; Free Cash Flow of $200mm over the next 5 years
Crocodile Gold has a Significant Exploration & Project Pipeline
Clear project pipeline over 5 years that includes:
• Big Hill
• Union Reefs Prospect Deposit
• Maud Creek
Crocodile Gold is one of the cheapest mid-tier Gold Producers
Making this an excellent entry point. If CRK increased to peer median P/NAV of 0.7x,
shares would appreciate over 100%
19. Management
Chantal Lavoie, P. Eng., Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Lavoie is a Professional Mining Engineer with extensive experience in mining operations and projects. Previously, Mr. Lavoie spent eight years at De
Beers Canada Inc. ("De Beers") where he was responsible for the Canadian operations of De Beers including Snap Lake and Victor Mines, the Gahcho Kue
Project and was acting CEO of De Beers. Mr. Lavoie has also worked for Barrick Gold Corporation at Goldstrike in Nevada and Aur Resources Inc. at the
former Louvicourt mine.
Robert Dufour, CPA, CA, Director of Finance, Interim Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Dufour is a Chartered Accountant with over 10 years of finance and accounting experience. He started his career with the Toronto office of
PriceWaterhouseCoopers and later joined Northgate Minerals Corporation as Corporate Controller and subsequently was promoted to Group Financial
Controller for Northgate Australian Venture Corporation (NAVCO), which was more recently acquired by Crocodile Gold Corporation.
Bill Nielsen, P. Geo, Vice President Exploration
Mr. Nielsen is an accredited geologist with over 35 years of worldwide mineral exploration and development experience. Most recently, he has been
working as a senior industry consultant to mining exploration companies working with a variety of commodities in various countries and geological
environments. From 2003 to 2008, Mr. Nielsen was the V.P. Exploration of Nevsun Resources Ltd., where he played a significant role in the discovery of
the Bisha gold-VMS deposit in Eritrea. He has worked for various companies within the Forbes & Manhattan Group since early 2010.
Colinda Parent, Vice President Corporate Development
Ms. Parent has extensive capital markets experience having spent over 15 years in institutional equity sales and 5 years in investment banking in
Toronto. Previously, Ms. Parent was one of the founders of Sandfire Securities, a Toronto-based institutional equity boutique focused on raising funds
for and trading stocks in small and mid-cap Canadian-listed resource companies. She also served on the Board and Executive Committee at Sandfire. Ms.
Parent is a CFA charter holder and has an MBA from the Ivey School of Business.
19
Operations Team : Ian Holland, General Manager, Stawell Gold Mine
Troy Cole, General Manager, Fosterville Gold Mine
Peter Crooks, General Manager, Northern Territory
20. Board Of Directors
Kevin Conboy, Director
Mr. Conboy was previously President and Chief Executive Officer of Acordia, Inc., a subsidiary of Wells Fargo based in Chicago. As well, he
served as Chief Executive Officer for the NIA Group of Paramus, New Jersey. Mr. Conboy possesses a wealth of experience in the financial
markets and has considerable exposure to financial instruments and business transactions. He sits on a number of corporate and charitable
boards. Mr. Conboy completed a B.A. from Colorado State University in 1973.
George Faught, CA, Lead Director
Mr. Faught is a Chartered Accountant with over 25 years of senior management experience and is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Aberdeen
International Inc. He has served as the Chief Financial Officer of publicly traded companies in the natural resources, financial services and
pharmaceutical industries. Mr. Faught has broad financial management, corporate development and operating experience and from 1999 to 2005
served as the Chief Financial Officer for North American Palladium Ltd., a mid-tier platinum group metal producer. Prior to that, he served as Chief
Financial Officer for Hudson Bay Mining & Smelting Co. Ltd., an integrated base metals producer, and William Resources Inc., an international gold
producer. He also serves as a director of several public companies in the resource sector.
Robert Getz, MBA, Director
Mr. Getz is a managing director and a co-founder of Cornerstone Equity Investors, LLC. Mr. Getz has strong experience in public and private debt and
equity financings and domestic and international mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Getz has served as a director of several public and private metals and
mining companies. He completed a B.A., cum laude, International Relations at Boston University in May 1985, and obtained his MBA, Finance in
February 1990 from The Stern School of Business at New York University.
Peter Tagliamonte, P. Eng., Director
Mr. Tagliamonte is a professional mining engineer and also holds an MBA from the Richard Ivey School of Business, at the University of Western Ontario.
He is currently the President and CEO of Sulliden Gold, the former President and CEO of Central Sun Mining Inc. and former Chief Operating Officer of
Desert Sun Mining Corp. where he was responsible for the development of the Jacobina Mine in Brazil into a 4,200-tonne-per-day mining operation. Mr.
Tagliamonte has over 25 years of progressive managerial experience building and operating mines worldwide, notably in Central and South America. In
2005, he received the Mining Journal's "Mine Manager of the Year" award in recognition for his work in the mining sector.
20
21. Investor Contact Information
Chantal Lavoie
Chairman, President and CEO
416-861-2964
clavoie@crocgold.com
www.crocgold.com
Find us on:
Investor Relations
Rob Hopkins
416-861-5899
info@crocgold.com
TSX: CRK
OTCQX: CROCF
FRANKFURT: XGC
Crocodile Gold Corporation
21