[Challenge:Future] Moral underpinnings of Capitalism
[Challenge:Future] loss of human identity
1. PRESENTATION BY:
MARYAM MUSTAFA MEMON
BBA (FALL 2011)
FROM INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION, KARACHI, PAKISTAN
TOPIC: LOSS OH HUMAN AS AN IDENTITY
DUE TO LACK OF MORAL FRAMEWORK.
2.
3. CAN YOU SEE! THERE IS SOMETHING COMMON
IN ALL THESE PICTURES…
WHAT IS IT?
THE COMMON THING HERE IS “EXCESS OF DATA”
OR “DATA PILING”.
POWER IS FELT DUE TO EXCESSIVE DATA BUT THE
QUESTION IS WHAT TO DO WITH THE POWER?
SO WE FACE THIS PILING DATA ISSUE DUE TO
TECHNOLOGY/ SIMULATION BUT THEN TO SOLVE
IT WE AGAIN GO FOR NEW TECHNOLOGIES.
4. SO WHERE ARE WE WRONG THEN?
• WE HAVE POWER BUT WE DON’T KNOW WHERE AND
HOW TO USE IT. SO WE NEED A “MORAL SYSTEM” OR
“MORAL FRAMEWORK”. DUE TO THE EXCESSIVE PILING
OF DATA, LET’S WORD IT AS “AUTOMATED
COMPARTMENTALIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE” TILL THE
NEXT DECADE, THE SUBJECT “HUMAN” WILL BE LOST
IN A TECHNOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK.
• FACT IS ALL OF US ARE CONDITIONED BY PARENTS
THAT ‘THIS IS RIGHT’ OR ‘THIS IS WRONG’. BUT HOW
DO WE COME TO KNOW THAT ON OUR OWN? THAT IS
THROUGH CONSTRUCTIVE PARALLELISM BETWEEN
ETHICS AND SCIENCE.
5. HOWEVER IN THIS TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN WORKPLACE
MORALS AND ETHICS ARE THOUGHT TO BE
TRADITIONAL AND HINDRANCE SO HERE IS AN IDEAL
PROPOSAL AS TO HOW YOU COULD IMPLEMENT
MORAL FRAMEWORK ALONG WITH SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY…
The number is objective. It
has its truth that any other
number added to it would
give the perfect objective
parallel truth as well.
6. THE SAME WAY!
SAY WHEN YOU INVEST 1 MILLION YOU GO FOR AN OPPORTUNITY
WHERE PLEASURE IS MAXIMIZED AND PAIN IS REDUCED. BUT YOU
ARE REDUCING THE PAIN FOR YOUR SELF YOU ARE CERTAINLY NOT
EVALUATING THE OBJECTIVE TRUTH BEHIND THE SUBJECT. YOU
MUST BE ENHANCING THE PAIN OF OTHER HUMANS WHILE
REDUCING YOUR PAIN. THIS IS THE EXACT PHILOSOPHY UNDER
ONE STATE WAGING WAR AGAINST OTHER, TESTS OF NUCLEAR
BOMBARDMENT, HEAVY LOSSES DUE TO INVESTMENTS AND EVERY
OTHER THING IN SOCIETY.
NOW WHAT TO DO!
START THINKING FOR EVERY SINGLE ACT OF YOUR LIFE AS TO WHY
YOU REACHED TO THAT PARTICULAR CONCLUSION AND ALWAYS GO
FOR SECONDARY OPINIONS. BECAUSE ON BASIS OF COMPARATIVE
ANALYSIS HUMANS COME ACROSS THE REAL MORAL OBJECTIVE
BEHIND AN ACT.
7. THIS WAY HUMAN RELATIONS ARE BUILD UP WITH
SECONDARY CONTRACTS. YOU USED A MACHINE IN YOUR
FACTORY. JUST ASK YOURSELF DID I DO ANY HARM? IS IT
RIGHT? DID I WASTE SOMETHING? DID SOMEONE GET
HURT WHILE PROCESSING? WHEN YOU REACH YOUR
DECISION GO FOR OPINION OF NEXT PERSON. THIS WAY
YOU WILL HAVE THE REALITY OF AN ACTION THAT
WHETHER THE ACT IS MORALLY CORRECT OR NOT.
THIS MAKES MORAL FRAMEWORK SIMPLE MATH. JUST
START THINKING ADD 2 AND 2 AND WHEN THE WHOLE
WORLD DOES SO THE HUMAN AS A “SUBJECT” WILL
NEVER DISAPPEAR DUE TO A CYCLICAL MORAL
FRAMEWORK.
8. SO THIS IS DIASTER OF THE UPCOMING
CENTURY! HOW RIGHT CAN THIS BE!
YOUR TIME TO DECIDE!
IF YOU THINK THIS REALITY IS A PART OF
MORAL SYSTEM THEN WHAT IS THE
SUBJECTIVE TRUTH BEHIND THIS??