SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 32
Download to read offline
2013

Blue
Book

Top Commercial Real Estate Markets
Market Comparison Report
The Coldwell Banker Commercial® brand took on the task of finding the ‘Top
Markets’ for Commercial Real Estate. Over 80 markets were ranked on 2 categories
for each property sector (Office, Retail, Multi-Family), then 2 additional final
categories:

1) % Change in Vacancy from Q3 2012 and Q3 2013 within the market1
2) % Change in Rental Rates from Q3 2012 and Q3 2013 within the market1
3) % Change in Population from Q3 2012 and Q3 2013 within the market1
4) % Change in Unemployment from Aug 2012 and Aug 2013 within the market2

1– source: Reis
2—source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Top Commercial RE Markets

1 Orlando, FL

Total

26

Nashville, TN

55

Columbia, SC

27

Fort Lauderdale, FL

28

Tacoma, WA

56

New Haven, CT

2

Portland, OR

3

Dallas, TX

29

Knoxville, TN

57

Kansas City, MO

4

Houston, TX

30

Colorado Springs, CO

58

Suburban Virginia, VA

5

Minneapolis, MN

31

Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL

59

Syracuse, NY

6

San Diego, CA

32

Columbus, OH

60

Little Rock, AR

7

Austin, TX

33

Richmond, VA

61

Detroit, MI

8

Raleigh-Durham, NC

34

Tulsa, OK

62

Birmingham, AL

9

Fort Worth, TX

35

Baltimore, MD

63

Chicago, IL

36

Omaha, NE

64

Memphis, TN

10

Denver, CO

37

Indianapolis, IN

65

Fairfield County, CT

38

Miami, FL

66

District of Columbia, DC

11

Orange County, CA

39

Hartford, CT

67

Pittsburgh, PA

12

Seattle, WA

40

Central New Jersey, NJ

68

Tucson, AZ

13

Charleston, SC

69

Providence, RI

14

San Jose, CA

41

Boston, MA

70

New Orleans, LA

15

Palm Beach, FL

42

Los Angeles, CA

16

Charlotte, NC

43

San Bernardino/Riverside, CA

71

Suburban Maryland, MD

17

Salt Lake City, UT

44

Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC

72

Lexington, KY

18

Las Vegas, NV

45

Oklahoma City, OK

73

Milwaukee, WI

19

Phoenix, AZ

46

Sacramento, CA

74

Westchester, NY

20

Oakland-East Bay, CA

47

Louisville, KY

75

Philadelphia, PA

21

San Antonio, TX

48

New York, NY

76

Wichita, KS

22

San Francisco, CA

49

Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA

77

Long Island, NY

23

Greenville, SC

50

Rochester, NY

78

Albuquerque, NM

24

Jacksonville, FL

51

Cincinnati, OH

79

St. Louis, MO

25

Atlanta, GA

52

Northern New Jersey, NJ

80

Cleveland, OH

53

Ventura County, CA

81

Dayton, OH

54

Buffalo, NY

82

Chattanooga, TN
Top Ranked Market

#1 Orlando, FL
Metro
Orlando, FL

Retail
Rank

MF
Rank

Office
Rank

Pop
Rank

Unemp
Rank

Cumulative
Score

Final Rank

2

10

8

6

1

27

1

Why Orlando is Growing
Central Florida’s real estate rebound is in full swing with Orlando leading the way. Cranes evidence the
downtown Orlando recovery as previously shelved hotel, office and apartment projects are resurrected. The
Dr. Phillips Center for the Performing Arts opens Fall 2014 and an 18,000-seat Major League Soccer stadium
will accommodate Orlando’s new MLS franchise. Orlando is still the top tourist destination in the world and will
host a record 56+ million visitors and generate $50 billion in economic impact in 2013; with expansions like
Disney’s Avatar, Magic Kingdom, Downtown Disney and The Wizarding World of Harry Potter at Universal
2014, visitation is expected to exceed 63 million and bring an additional $1.3 billion of new business.
Burgeoning Lake Nona Medical City is home to such facilities as the Nemour Children’s Hospital, UCF’s Health Sciences
Campus, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute and VA Hospital; by 2017 “Medical City” is expected to create
30,000 jobs and $7.6 billion in economic impact. To accommodate Orlando’s population and tourism growth, Orlando
International Airport is preparing for a $1.1 billion expansion to host an estimated 45 million travelers by 2020. SunRail will
begin service in Spring 2014; running 61 miles from Volusia to Osceola County linking Central Florida together and
eventually connecting with “All Aboard Florida” which will run from Orlando to Miami and South Florida. SunRail is expected
to generate over 261,000 jobs and $8.8 billion in economic impact over 30 years. The sun and the economic outlook are
shining bright in Orlando.
Paul Hoffman, Coldwell Banker Commercial NRT, Orlando, FL
Top Markets: Rankings
Metro

Orlando, FL
Portland, OR
Dallas, TX
Houston, TX
Minneapolis, MN
San Diego, CA
Austin, TX
Raleigh-Durham, NC
Fort Worth, TX
Denver, CO
Orange County, CA
Seattle, WA
Charleston, SC
San Jose, CA
Palm Beach, FL
Charlotte, NC
Salt Lake City, UT
Las Vegas, NV
Phoenix, AZ
Oakland-East Bay, CA
San Antonio, TX
San Francisco, CA
Greenville, SC
Jacksonville, FL
Atlanta, GA
Nashville, TN
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Tacoma, WA
Knoxville, TN
Colorado Springs, CO
Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL
Columbus, OH
Richmond, VA
Tulsa, OK
Baltimore, MD
Miami, FL
Omaha, NE
Indianapolis, IN
Hartford, CT
Central New Jersey, NJ
Boston, MA
Source: Reis

Retail
Rank
2

MF
Rank
10

Office
Rank
8

Pop Unemp Cumulative Final Available
Rank Rank
Score
Rank Properties
View Listings
6
1
27
1

22

11

5

13

24

75

7

18

16

7

33

81

10

4

23

9

35

81

4

16

9

34

19

82

18

3

28

25

9

83

3

40

7

2

32

84

11

22

25

4

25

87

5

35

13

5

33

91

45

24

3

11

18

101

16

28

1

44

15

104

28

28

18

23

13

110

25

22

4

22

45

118

21

42

2

56

4

125

31

45

30

24

10

140

43

29

48

3

22

145

28

54

42

14

7

145

22

25

69

10

20

146

15

15

46

1

70

147

71

1

24

49

5

150

67

14

15

8

49

153

61

33

19

36

5

154

66

2

13

27

50

158

78

11

50

34

3

176

49

20

42

19

47

177

52

25

16

17

67

177

14

66

59

31

10

181

72

8

44

44

13

181

25

46

9

32

73

185

64

25

53

18

29

189

70

17

53

50

2

192

33

6

38

47

73

197

31

48

28

39

53

199

57

40

11

39

56

203

20

11

56

60

57

204

54

38

38

65

10

205

40

7

63

30

65

205

59

69

22

20

36

206

1

36

44

74

52

207

37
17

74
42

20
11

54
62

23
77

208
209

2
3
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
25
27
27
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
38
38
37
39
40
41

View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
Quotes from Top 10 Markets
Here are a few thoughts from Coldwell Banker Commercial agents on why their market is in the top 10.

San Diego, CA
San Diego’s economic rebound is surpassing expectations in numerous local markets. Positive trends in
unemployment, real estate, tourism and production indicate that the worst of the economic crisis may be
over. Downtown is experiencing growth with new high-rise hotels and multifamily developments approved
and under construction, along with the $12.8 million expansion project scheduled for Horton Plaza with
completion in 2015. Leading the San Diego recovery is the tourism industry, which employs over 160,000
people throughout the County. San Diego is one of the top tourist destinations in Southern California and
hosts 32 million visitors each year, generating more than $8 billion annually, which translates to an economic impact of
over $18.3 billion dollars generated for the regional economy. Housing prices have increased 10%in the last year and
the unemployment rate is holding steady at 7.4%, lower than the State average of 8.9%
Brandon Sudweeks, CCIM, Coldwell Banker Commercial Sudweeks Group, San Diego, CA

Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis is a city with much opportunity and a city that strives to be a leader in new health solutions,
technologies, entertainment, and up-and-coming trends. Because of this, our market is appealing to
businesses and families alike. Minneapolis holds 3 professional sports teams, a prominent downtown
business college, major corporate offices such as Target Corp. and US Bank, and many present and future
construction developments for both residential and commercial. With this brings a steady flow of new jobs,
new housing opportunities and new business opportunities. The city’s highly-educated and culturally
connected workforce also create much business success. Despite the largeness of Minneapolis as a city, there still
tends to be an atmosphere of camaraderie in supporting local businesses and teaming together to make our community
better as a whole both economically and socially. Minneapolis’ bordering “twin” city, St. Paul, also brings a wealth of
business and opportunities. The Twin Cities together house 19 Fortune 500 Cos., 4 professional sports teams, and
many major downtown companies such as those stated above for Minneapolis specific and Ecolab and Securian
Financial in St. Paul.
Jeffrey L. LaFavre, CCIM, MCR, SIOR, Coldwell Banker Commercial Griffin Companies, Minneapolis, MN
Top Markets: Rankings Cont.
Metro

Los Angeles, CA
San Bernardino/Riverside, CA
Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC
Oklahoma City, OK
Sacramento, CA
Louisville, KY
New York, NY
Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA
Rochester, NY
Cincinnati, OH
Northern New Jersey, NJ
Ventura County, CA
Buffalo, NY
Columbia, SC
New Haven, CT
Kansas City, MO
Suburban Virginia, VA
Syracuse, NY
Little Rock, AR
Detroit, MI
Birmingham, AL
Chicago, IL
Memphis, TN
Fairfield County, CT
District of Columbia, DC
Pittsburgh, PA
Tucson, AZ
Providence, RI
New Orleans, LA
Suburban Maryland, MD
Lexington, KY
Milwaukee, WI
Westchester, NY
Philadelphia, PA
Wichita, KS
Long Island, NY
Albuquerque, NM
St. Louis, MO
Cleveland, OH
Dayton, OH
Chattanooga, TN

Retail
Rank
36

MF
Rank
59

Office
Rank
32

Pop
Rank
52

Unemp Cumulative
Rank
Score
36
215

63

47

64

26

15

215

57

59

41

38

21

216

47

51

20

29

71

218

67

38

72

33

10

220

13

72

52

43

43

223

45*

79

5

59

38

226

11

68

70

48

31

228

37

30

60

76

26

229

25

5

79

57

66

232

9

64

62

63

38

236

41

54

80

46

17

238

78

21

32

81

27

239

77

30

74

15

44

240

22

53

38

70

58

241

44

42

37

39

81

243

35

62

76

11

60

244

50

8

78

79

30

245

54

56

27

36

73

246

64

19

55

80

42

260

37

67

75

55

28

262

41

50

26

67

78

262

7

56

77

42

80

262

6

75

51

73

59

264

53*

77

61

15

60

266

28

65

35

78

60

266

46

48

81

27

73

275

54

52

48

69

53

276

19

73

46

61

81

280

52

58

57

53

60

280

76

76

58

20

51

281

62

71

32

68

48

281

47

70

71

63

38

289

72

63

31

71

53

290

69

36

67

58

67

297

33

80

72

75

38

298

50

81

68

66

45

310

60

61

66

72

64

323

80

30

64

82

69

325

72
75

82
78

36
82

77
51

72
79

339
365

Final
Rank

Available
Properties

42
42
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
62
62
65
66
66
68
69
70
70
72
72
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82

View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings
View Listings

* -NY & Washington, DC data was not available for Retail Sector. An average of the other rankings was given so a final rank could be achieved; Source: Reis
Rebuttals from Bottom Markets
With any survey, the results will depend on what variables you look at and how you look at them. That’s why we gave a
few markets ranked in the bottom 10 a chance to talk about the positives in their market.

New Orleans, LA
By almost all accounts, Greater New Orleans is a great place to do business. In economic development, we
are at the highest point, in every economic ranking, in our history. Greater New Orleans was recently
ranked #2 “Boomtown in America”, due to population and GDP growth. Just last week, the region was
ranked #6 for creating middle-income jobs in the USA by Forbes. Encouragingly, talented people are voting
with their feet, choosing this region to build a career and start a family. In fact, Louisiana has enjoyed five
straight years of net in-migration for the first time in decades, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. New
Orleans grew faster than any other major U.S. city in the 15 months after the 2010 decennial headcount. And as more
and more people make New Orleans their home, their talents come with them, evidenced by the city's No. 1 ranking on
the list of "America's Biggest Brain Magnets" for attracting people under 25 with college degrees, according to Forbes.
Mark Inman, CCIM, Coldwell Banker Commercial TEC, New Orleans, LA

Birmingham, AL
Birmingham has the following positives: UAB Medical Center, University and Medical School continues to
grow, growing employment and bringing medical research dollars to the economy. Birmingham is a
regional retail center offering retail goods and services for Central Alabama. The Birmingham MSA offers
shopping choices only found in Birmingham for most of the State's residence, supporting expansion of
retail goods and services. Political structure of the MSA creates competition between Cities in the MSA for
new development, encouraging more public / private investments. Birmingham's CBD is going through a
renaissance with new development in sports, office, retail and residential development. Birmingham is the interchange
center of four major interstates connecting it to major cites in Tennessee, Georgia, Mississippi and Florida, coupled with
multiple converging rail lines makes the MSA an excellent distribution center. Birmingham is a solid community with a
great infrastructure designed for growth.
Wesley Cline, CCIM, Coldwell Banker Commercial Moore Company Realty, Birmingham, AL

Chicago, IL
Chicago is one of most dynamic cities in the world. Chicago has a population of 9.5 million people, 4 million
culturally diverse employees and 265,000 businesses. It has over 400 major corporate headquarters
including 29 Fortune 500 companies. Chicago is a leader in a number of key industries including: Business
& Financial Services, Manufacturing, Information Technology, Health Services and Transportation &
Distribution, and is a global leader in options, futures and derivatives trading. The commercial real estate
market is also one of the largest and most active in the world. The industrial market consists of 1.15 billion
SF of space with only an 8.8% vacancy rate. The office market consists of 460 million SF with a current vacancy of
14.1%. The retail market consists of 262 million SF with a vacancy of only 7.1%.
Jordan Schnoll, CCIM , Coldwell Banker Commercial NRT, Chicago, IL
Office
Top Commercial RE Markets

OFFICE

1

Orange County, CA

28

San Diego, CA

56

Baltimore, MD

2

San Jose, CA

30

Palm Beach, FL

57

Suburban Maryland, MD

3

Denver, CO

31

Philadelphia, PA

58

Lexington, KY

4

Charleston, SC

32

Buffalo, NY

59

Fort Lauderdale, FL

5

New York, NY

32

Los Angeles, CA

60

Rochester, NY

5

Portland, OR

32

Milwaukee, WI

61

District of Columbia, DC

7

Austin, TX

35

Pittsburgh, PA

62

Northern New Jersey, NJ

8

Orlando, FL

36

Dayton, OH

63

Omaha, NE

9

Knoxville, TN

37

Kansas City, MO

64

Cleveland, OH

9

Minneapolis, MN

38

Columbus, OH

64

San Bernardino/Riverside, CA

38

Miami, FL

66

St. Louis, MO

38

New Haven, CT

67

Wichita, KS

68

Albuquerque, NM

11

Boston, MA

11

Tulsa, OK

13

Fort Worth, TX

41

Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC

69

Las Vegas, NV

13

Greenville, SC

42

Atlanta, GA

70

Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA

15

San Antonio, TX

42

Salt Lake City, UT

16

Dallas, TX

44

Hartford, CT

71

Westchester, NY

16

Nashville, TN

44

Tacoma, WA

72

Long Island, NY

18

Seattle, WA

46

New Orleans, LA

72

Sacramento, CA

19

San Francisco, CA

46

Phoenix, AZ

74

Columbia, SC

20

Central New Jersey, NJ

48

Charlotte, NC

75

Birmingham, AL

20

Oklahoma City, OK

48

Providence, RI

76

Suburban Virginia, VA

22

Indianapolis, IN

50

Jacksonville, FL

77

Memphis, TN

23

Houston, TX

51

Fairfield County, CT

78

Syracuse, NY

24

Oakland-East Bay, CA

52

Louisville, KY

79

Cincinnati, OH

25

Raleigh-Durham, NC

53

Colorado Springs, CO

80

Ventura County, CA

53

Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL

81

Tucson, AZ

55

Detroit, MI

82

Chattanooga, TN

26

Chicago, IL

27

Little Rock, AR

28

Richmond, VA
Top 5 Ranked Office Markets
Orange County, CA
Reis’s data show the Orange County general purpose, multi-tenant office market in the throes of a substantial recovery. While still
elevated relative to pre-recession levels, the vacancy rate is declining amid strong absorption and minimal speculative development.
And while current average lease rates remain well below those seen prior to the downturn, growth, albeit in modest proportion, has
returned to rents. The market’s Achilles heel in the recent downturn was the large mortgage industry tenant base, which led the
sector’s decline during the recession. The wound has healed: strength in the mortgage sector, reflecting the housing rebound, has
been a factor in the market’s turnaround. Leasing has been strong and absorption numbers have been high. 1
YTD $1.1 billion in sales

55 Transactions2

San Jose, CA
Reflecting the strong local economy and the expanding high technology Business sector, the Silicon Valley general purpose,
multitenant office market shows considerable strength. Demand has been strong; a new development cycle is underway. By Reis’s
count, net absorption through the first half of the year accompanied by 817,000 SF of new supply was 766,000 SF. While still elevated,
vacancy has been declining persuasively. The rate for the second quarter was 18.8%, down 30 basis points for the period, down 110
year-over-year. The positive performance seen in July-August took 20 additional points from the rate. On the other hand, major
employers such as Google, Apple and Salesforce have already taken space sufficient to accommodate several years of growth. Rents
are high; growth has been strong. At $31.45 psf, second quarter asking averages were up 1.6% each for the period following gains of
about 1.0% in the first quarter. Ranked the #2 market in this survey for rate change. A rapid depletion of Class A blocks of space over
the last 24 months encourages development. 1
YTD $2.3 billion in sales

67 Transactions2

Denver, CO
According to Reis, 2013 was “a break out year” for the Denver area office market, citing the strong local economy, rising rents, and
the return of construction. Leasing has “returned to normal”—“normal” being pre-recession activity levels. In addition, several sources
report increasing employment in office-using sectors. Net absorption has been strongly positive since 2011, the vacancy rate has fallen
to its lowest point since early 2009, and rates of rent growth, albeit gradually, are increasing. Led by downtown Denver and areas on its
periphery, moreover, substantial volumes of new office space were under construction and planned per the date of this report. While
most of the current building activity is build-to-suit, speculative development, following a prolonged absence, is beginning to reappear.
While a deluge of supply is not expected, spec construction should be a visible trend in the period ahead. Investment, charged by
several major recent sales, has been very strong in recent quarters. 1
YTD $1.7 billion in sales

79 Transactions2

Charleston, SC
The Charleston area market grows tighter. Absorption has remained positive because there is a diminishing availability of quality
space. By Reis’s count, second quarter vacancy was 15.6%, down 100 basis points for the period, down 180 year-over-year. The
Class A rate, however, was considerably lower at 13.0%, a decline of fully 260 basis points for the quarter alone, a loss of 350 yearover-year. This was the #1 ranked market in this survey for change in vacancy for office. The volume of vacant Class A space had
shrunk to only 551,000 SF by the end of the quarter. Absorption, accordingly, is dominated by this sector. With no space completing
construction through the first half of the year, total metro area net absorption was counted by Reis at 96,000 SF. The Class A total was
117,000. Technology continued to be the primary driver of tenant demand Boeing has purchased the 178,000 SF Applied Technology
Research Center for expansion, thus displacing The South Carolina Research Authority which will be relocating its headquarters to
Mead Westvaco’s 4,500-acre Nexton mixed-use development in Summerville for a 75,000 SF built-to-suit.1

New York, NY
The 354-million-SF general purpose, multi-tenant Manhattan office is a moderate success by the standards of the past, but in a boom
mode by the standards of the present. Despite the completion of extensive new space the vacancy rate remained in the single digits in
the third quarter of 2013, and rents increased at about the same pace as has been common since the recovery began in 2011. What is
most encouraging is that the office market is solid even though the city’s leading sector—finance—continues to downsize. Reis
predicts that 17.5 million SF of new space will be added within its Manhattan submarkets from 2013 to 2017. While that would
constitute the largest building boom since the 1980s, it would only restore the size of the inventory to its level during the mid-1990s,
and even then only if there are no more office-to-residential or hotel conversions. 1
YTD $16.4 billion in sales 148 Transactions2

Sources: 1-Reis; 2-Real Capital Analytics
Top Markets: OFFICE
Metro

RANKS
Q3 2013 % Change
Vac % Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13

Vac
Rank

Asking %Change Rent Rate
Rent $ Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rank

Final
Rank

Orange County, CA

17.3

-8.95%

4

$27.45

2.20%

9

San Jose, CA

18.6

-5.10%

18

$31.68

5.28%

2

Denver, CO

17.5

-6.91%

11

$22.14

1.98%

12

Charleston, SC

15.3

-10.53%

1

$21.49

1.42%

23

New York, NY

9.7

-3.96%

24

$61.16

4.62%

3

Portland, OR

13.6

-8.72%

5

$21.84

1.58%

22

Austin, TX

16.4

-4.09%

23

$26.58

2.47%

6

Orlando, FL

18.2

-4.71%

21

$21.43

2.05%

10

Minneapolis, MN

17.3

-4.95%

19

$22.33

1.64%

19

Knoxville, TN

14.3

-10.06%

3

$16.02

1.14%

35

Boston, MA

13.9

-3.47%

26

$37.04

1.95%

14

Tulsa, OK

17.2

-7.03%

10

$14.79

1.23%

30

Greenville, SC

19.2

-3.03%

31

$16.85

2.00%

11

Fort Worth, TX

16.3

-5.23%

17

$19.63

1.39%

25

San Antonio, TX

18.0

-5.26%

16

$20.25

1.20%

31

Dallas, TX

23.1

-1.28%

43

$20.26

3.16%

5

Nashville, TN

12.8

-7.25%

8

$20.33

0.99%

40

Seattle, WA

13.7

-2.84%

33

$29.86

1.88%

16

San Francisco, CA

13.3

-0.75%

49

$43.69

7.72%

1

Central New Jersey, NJ

21.8

-5.63%

15

$23.98

1.05%

37

Oklahoma City, OK

16.8

-10.16%

2

$15.00

0.81%

50

Indianapolis, IN

19.2

-5.88%

14

$17.91

1.02%

39

Houston, TX

14.2

-0.70%

50

$25.67

4.35%

4

Oakland-East Bay, CA

17.9

-3.24%

29

$26.26

1.27%

28

Raleigh-Durham, NC

15.1

-6.79%

12

$20.38

0.84%

47

Chicago, IL

18.7

0.00%

54

$27.98

2.30%

7

Little Rock, AR

12.2

-7.58%

7

$15.79

0.77%

55

San Diego, CA

16.3

-2.98%

32

$28.59

1.20%

31

Richmond, VA

14.8

-3.27%

28

$18.57

1.14%

35

Palm Beach, FL

19.1

-5.91%

13

$28.40

0.78%

54

Philadelphia, PA

14.1

-7.24%

9

$24.79

0.65%

59

Los Angeles, CA

15.8

0.00%

54

$32.76

1.64%

18

Milwaukee, WI

18.8

-1.05%

46

$19.11

1.38%

26

Buffalo, NY

14.2

-8.39%

6

$17.02

0.41%

66

Pittsburgh, PA

15.7

1.29%

61

$21.13

1.98%

12

Dayton, OH

26.6

-2.56%

34

$14.62

0.97%

41

Kansas City, MO

17.3

0.00%

54

$19.27

1.42%

23

Columbus, OH

18.7

1.08%

59

$18.09

1.63%

20

New Haven, CT

17.8

-2.20%

36

$20.83

0.92%

43

Miami, FL

16.9

-3.43%

27

$30.45

0.79%

52

Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC

20.9

-1.88%

40

$16.42

0.92%

43

Source: Reis

1
2
3
4
5
5
7
8
9
9
11
11
13
13
15
16
16
18
19
20
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
28
30
31
32
32
32
35
36
37
38
38
38
41
Top Markets: OFFICE Cont.
Metro

RANKS

Q3 2013 % Change
Vac % Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13

Vac
Rank

Asking %Change Rent Rate
Rent $ Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rank

Final
Rank

Atlanta, GA

20.3

-1.46%

42

$21.64

0.93%

42

Salt Lake City, UT

17.3

-2.26%

35

$18.43

0.82%

49

Hartford, CT

21.4

2.88%

65

$21.29

1.62%

20

Tacoma, WA

16.0

-3.61%

25

$20.17

0.60%

60

New Orleans, LA

13.4

3.88%

71

$18.40

1.88%

15

Phoenix, AZ

25.6

-0.78%

48

$22.52

1.03%

38

Charlotte, NC

17.8

9.20%

79

$21.91

2.29%

8

Providence, RI

15.6

-1.89%

39

$20.57

0.83%

48

Jacksonville, FL

20.8

0.48%

58

$18.52

1.15%

34

Fairfield County, CT

22.5

5.14%

76

$34.78

1.70%

17

Louisville, KY

15.7

2.61%

64

$16.36

1.24%

29

Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL

22.2

3.26%

67

$21.33

1.28%

27

Colorado Springs, CO

19.4

-4.90%

20

$16.49

0.00%

74

Detroit, MI

25.8

-1.53%

41

$18.99

0.74%

57

Baltimore, MD

16.4

-4.65%

22

$23.40

-0.17%

77

Suburban Maryland, MD

15.2

-0.65%

51

$28.23

0.79%

52

Lexington, KY

15.5

-3.13%

30

$17.07

-0.12%

75

Fort Lauderdale, FL

19.7

-1.99%

38

$25.52

0.08%

70

Rochester, NY

16.9

-1.17%

44

$16.29

0.43%

65

District of Columbia, DC

9.6

3.23%

66

$50.13

0.89%

45

Northern New Jersey, NJ

18.8

-1.05%

46

$27.81

0.32%

67

Omaha, NE

15.7

3.29%

68

$17.27

0.88%

46

Cleveland, OH

24.0

15.94%

82

$18.69

1.19%

33

San Bernardino/Riverside, CA

24.0

-2.04%

37

$21.28

-0.23%

78

St. Louis, MO

17.9

-0.56%

52

$20.55

0.44%

64

Wichita, KS

17.7

1.72%

62

$14.33

0.77%

55

Albuquerque, NM

18.1

4.02%

72

$16.25

0.81%

50

Las Vegas, NV

25.9

-1.15%

45

$23.71

-0.42%

80

Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA

15.6

3.31%

69

$19.15

0.74%

57

Westchester, NY

18.7

1.08%

59

$28.56

0.07%

72

Sacramento, CA

21.3

1.91%

63

$23.71

0.08%

70

Long Island, NY

13.9

0.00%

54

$26.81

-0.37%

79

Columbia, SC

18.3

-0.54%

53

$15.94

-0.75%

82

Birmingham, AL

13.2

4.76%

74

$19.12

0.53%

62

Suburban Virginia, VA

17.0

7.59%

78

$32.09

0.60%

60

Memphis, TN

23.7

4.87%

75

$18.24

0.50%

63

Syracuse, NY

16.3

4.49%

73

$15.97

0.31%

68

Cincinnati, OH

20.8

3.48%

70

$18.69

0.05%

73

Ventura County, CA

17.3

9.49%

80

$24.25

0.21%

69

Tucson, AZ

15.2

7.04%

77

$21.41

-0.14%

76

Chattanooga, TN

16.9

12.67%

81

$14.72

-0.54%

81

Source: Reis

42
42
44
44
46
46
48
48
50
51
52
53
53
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
64
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
72
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
Retail
Top Commercial RE Markets

Retail

2

Orlando, FL

3

Austin, TX

4

Minneapolis, MN

5

Fort Worth, TX

6

Fairfield County, CT

7

Dallas, TX

7

Memphis, TN

9

Northern New Jersey, NJ

10 Houston, TX

11

Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA

11

Louisville, KY

14

Fort Lauderdale, FL

15

Phoenix, AZ

16

Orange County, CA

17

Boston, MA

18

San Diego, CA

19

New Orleans, LA

20

Baltimore, MD

21

San Jose, CA

22

Las Vegas, NV

22

New Haven, CT

22

Portland, OR

25

Charleston, SC

25

Cincinnati, OH

25

Knoxville, TN

28

Pittsburgh, PA

Providence, RI

28

Salt Lake City, UT

28

Seattle, WA

57

Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC

31

Palm Beach, FL

57

Tulsa, OK

31

Richmond, VA

59

Indianapolis, IN

33

Columbus, OH

60

St. Louis, MO

33

Long Island, NY

61

San Francisco, CA

35

Suburban Virginia, VA

62

Milwaukee, WI

36

Los Angeles, CA

63

San Bernardino/Riverside, CA

37

Birmingham, AL

64

Colorado Springs, CO

37

Central New Jersey, NJ

64

Detroit, MI

Rochester, NY

66

Greenville, SC

40

Omaha, NE

67

Sacramento, CA

67

San Antonio, TX

Raleigh-Durham, NC

13

54

37

1 Hartford, CT

41

Chicago, IL

69

Wichita, KS

41

Ventura County, CA

70

Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL

43

Charlotte, NC

44

Kansas City, MO

71

Oakland-East Bay, CA

45

Denver, CO

72

Dayton, OH

46

Tucson, AZ

72

Philadelphia, PA

47

Oklahoma City, OK

72

Tacoma, WA

47

Westchester, NY

75

Chattanooga, TN

49

Atlanta, GA

76

Lexington, KY

50

Albuquerque, NM

77

Columbia, SC

50

Syracuse, NY

78

Buffalo, NY

52

Nashville, TN

78

Jacksonville, FL

52

Suburban Maryland, MD

80

Cleveland, OH

54

Little Rock, AR

54

Miami, FL
Top 5 Ranked Retail Markets
Hartford, CT
The 14.5-million SF Hartford MSA community-neighborhood shopping center market continued to benefit from incremental improvement
through two-thirds of 2013. No space of this type has completed construction within Reis submarkets since 2010, and none is under
construction. With net absorption at 73,000 SF for 2013 through August, the vacancy rate is down 50 basis points year-to date to 9.5%.
The average asking rent increased 0.6% in the second quarter to $17.55 psf. This was the #2 ranked market for rate increase. Additional
increases through August brought the gain to 1.1% asking year-to-date. Reis reports a vacancy rate of 6.4% for power centers, down 30
basis points from the prior quarter and 140 from a year earlier. The average asking rent for power centers is $22.31 psf, up 0.5% for the
quarter and 2.2% year-over-year.1
$248 million in sales

8 Transactions2

Orlando, FL
The sharp recession related cutbacks in residential construction and the collapse of the housing market brought a period of difficulty to
the local retail real estate market. Vacancy in the community-neighborhood shopping center retail sector, which peaked at 14.0% as
recently as the third quarter of 2012, has only recently begun to subside. By the end of the second quarter of 2013 the level had dropped
to 13.1%, a loss of 50 basis points for the quarter alone, a decline of 80 since year-end. This made Orlando the #2 market in % drop in
Vacancy. The source of the progress in occupancy since last year was the persistence of positive net absorption in the presence of no
new supply deliveries. The absorption total for the first half of 2013 was 252,000 SF. The total for the second quarter alone was 170,000
SF. Growth, at last, has returned to average rents. At $17.62 psf asking averages for the second quarter were up 0.6% for the period
following gains of 1.0% for each rate the quarter before. Recent construction, meanwhile, has been dominated by small neighborhood
center projects. As of mid-year, Reis was reporting 4.9 million SF of retail space in the planned-proposed pipeline across all product
categories.1
$687 million in sales

53 Transactions2

Austin, TX
Vacancy is leveling off at a moderate level in Austin’s 20.7-million-SF community-neighborhood shopping center market, but rent gains
remain modest. The rate was 6.7% during the second quarter, down 20 basis points for the period as net absorption totaled 81,000 SF
and two neighborhood center projects added 58,000 SF within Reis submarkets. After a flat first quarter, rents increased 0.7% in the
second quarter. The second quarter asking average was $20.44 psf. Community-neighborhood center development is expected to
remain limited, as there is no space currently under construction. Rent gains, however, are expected to pick up. Big-box and mixed-use
developments are all the rage in Austin retail. The latest new construction data show three power center projects under construction with
1.9 million SF, three mixed-use projects with 883,400 SF of retail, and three freestanding stores totaling 314,700 SF. For power centers,
Reis reports a relatively high second quarter vacancy rate of 7.6%, down 120 basis points from the prior quarter and 100 from a year
earlier. The average asking rent for power centers is $24.34 psf, up 0.4% for the quarter and 0.6% from a year earlier. 1
$442 million in sales

33 Transactions2

Minneapolis, MN
The 33.6-million SF Minneapolis community neighborhood shopping center market is in balance as of mid-2013, but only due to a near
absence of new supply. The vacancy rate fell 20 basis points to 11.1% in the second quarter, when year-to-date net absorption reached
164,000 SF. The 10,800-SF Crossroads Plaza neighborhood center completed construction in Hopkins in April, leaving 213,700 SF of
community-neighborhood center space under construction in six projects. The average asking rent increased 0.3% during the quarter, to
$17.80 psf. The rate is forecast at 10.8% at year-end 2013, down 70 basis points over the year. 1
$612 million in sales

43 Transactions2

Fort Worth, TX
The 28.5-million SF Fort Worth community-neighborhood shopping center market enjoyed positive trends in the first half of 2013, despite
competition from the big-box sector. The second quarter 2013 vacancy rate was 12.0%, down 60 basis points from the end of 2012 on
179,000 SF of net absorption and no new supply. The second quarter saw community-neighborhood center rents rise up 0.8%, to $14.51
psf asking, an unusually large quarterly increase. Rents had increased just 1.0% asking during all of 2012. Reis, however, expects the
vacancy rate to fall to 11.7% by the end of 2013, with rent gains coming in at 1.5% asking for the year. The power center vacancy rate is
6.2% for the second quarter of 2013, down 80 basis points from the prior quarter and 180 from a year earlier, so the big- box segment is
starting to get tight.1

Sources: 1-Reis; 2-Real Capital Analytics
Top Markets: Retail
Metro

RANKS
Q3 2013 % Change
Vac
Vac % Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rank

Asking %Change Rent
Rent $ Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13

Rate
Rank

Final
Rank

Hartford, CT

10.4

-6.73%

8

$17.24

2.44%

2

Orlando, FL

14.0

-9.29%

2

$17.34

1.85%

10

7.2

-8.33%

3

$20.18

1.73%

16

Minneapolis, MN

11.5

-5.22%

15

$17.53

2.00%

7

Fort Worth, TX

13.1

-6.87%

5

$14.30

1.54%

19

Austin, TX

Fairfield County, CT

4.0

-5.00%

19

$27.81

2.05%

6

Memphis, TN

13.1

-7.63%

4

$13.41

1.34%

24

Dallas, TX

14.2

-5.63%

14

$16.47

1.76%

14

5.9

-10.17%

1

$27.86

1.01%

34

Houston, TX

12.5

-3.20%

32

$16.04

2.18%

4

Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA

10.4

-4.81%

20

$14.91

1.54%

18

9.5

-3.16%

33

$17.57

2.16%

5

Louisville, KY

10.5

-6.67%

9

$15.67

1.08%

31

Fort Lauderdale, FL

10.9

-2.75%

39

$18.78

1.86%

9

Phoenix, AZ

11.6

-5.17%

17

$18.62

1.02%

33

Orange County, CA

5.8

-3.45%

29

$30.70

1.43%

22

Boston, MA

6.9

-4.35%

24

$21.83

1.19%

29

Northern New Jersey, NJ

Raleigh-Durham, NC

San Diego, CA

6.4

-3.13%

34

$28.38

1.41%

23

11.9

-1.68%

49

$14.89

1.81%

11

Baltimore, MD

7.4

-6.76%

7

$21.42

0.61%

54

San Jose, CA

5.9

-1.69%

48

$30.82

1.75%

15

New Orleans, LA

Portland, OR

8.7

-5.75%

13

$20.15

0.65%

51

Las Vegas, NV

13.0

-3.85%

26

$20.93

0.91%

38

New Haven, CT

12.5

0.00%

63

$16.13

2.54%

1

Charleston, SC

11.6

-6.03%

10

$13.44

0.60%

55

Knoxville, TN

11.1

-4.50%

22

$13.96

0.79%

43

Cincinnati, OH

13.9

-4.32%

25

$14.69

0.88%

40

Salt Lake City, UT

13.3

-6.77%

6

$16.06

0.44%

60

Seattle, WA

7.0

-2.86%

38

$22.96

1.26%

28

Pittsburgh, PA

8.0

0.00%

63

$16.14

2.42%

3

Richmond, VA

9.7

-3.09%

35

$15.94

0.94%

35

Palm Beach, FL

12.2

-0.82%

62

$21.35

1.97%

8

Columbus, OH

16.0

-1.88%

45

$12.65

1.11%

30

Long Island, NY

5.3

0.00%

63

$25.53

1.80%

12

Suburban Virginia, VA

6.9

-5.80%

12

$27.81

0.32%

65

Los Angeles, CA

6.1

-1.64%

51

$29.13

1.27%

27

Rochester, NY

13.0

-3.85%

26

$12.91

0.62%

53

Birmingham, AL

15.3

-1.31%

54

$14.57

1.30%

25

Central New Jersey, NJ

10.2

-0.98%

58

$22.25

1.48%

21

9.1

-3.30%

31

$13.66

0.73%

49

Omaha, NE
Source: Reis

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
7
9
10
11
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
22
22
25
25
25
28
28
28
31
31
33
33
35
36
37
37
37
40
Top Markets: Retail Cont.
Metro

RANKS

Q3 2013 % Change
Vac % Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13

Vac
Rank

Asking
Rent $

%Change Rent Rate
Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rank

Final
Rank

7.2

-1.39%

53

$24.27

0.82%

42

Little Rock, AR

12.1

4.96%

78

$12.49

1.68%

17

Tulsa, OK
Greensboro/Winston-Salem,
NC
Indianapolis, IN

17.0

-3.53%

28

$11.19

0.27%

68

41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57

11.7

-0.85%

59

$14.06

0.92%

37

58

15.2

-1.97%

43

$14.58

0.48%

59

St. Louis, MO

12.9

-2.33%

40

$14.71

0.34%

63

3.9

0.00%

63

$32.86

0.85%

41

Milwaukee, WI

12.8

0.78%

71

$15.06

0.93%

36

San Bernardino/Riverside, CA

10.2

-1.96%

44

$20.57

0.29%

67

Detroit, MI

12.0

-1.67%

50

$16.92

0.35%

62

Colorado Springs, CO

15.5

0.65%

69

$13.89

0.79%

43

Greenville, SC

14.0

-1.43%

52

$11.79

0.34%

63

San Antonio, TX

11.5

-1.74%

47

$14.90

0.20%

70

Sacramento, CA

12.4

0.81%

72

$21.81

0.78%

45

Wichita, KS

13.3

-2.26%

41

$12.08

-0.41%

78

Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL

11.8

0.00%

63

$14.24

0.56%

57

6.2

1.61%

76

$27.93

0.75%

48

16.5

-1.82%

46

$10.65

-0.47%

80

9.6

-1.04%

57

$19.83

0.25%

69

Tacoma, WA

11.9

-0.84%

61

$18.60

0.32%

65

Chattanooga, TN

14.2

7.75%

80

$12.35

0.57%

56

Lexington, KY

8.1

6.17%

79

$13.93

0.43%

60

Columbia, SC

11.4

0.00%

63

$12.33

-0.41%

77

Buffalo, NY

13.8

0.72%

70

$12.05

-0.25%

76

Jacksonville, FL

12.8

1.56%

75

$15.26

0.13%

71

Cleveland, OH

14.7

3.40%

77

$14.95

-0.07%

74

59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80

Ventura County, CA

9.1

-4.40%

23

$28.62

0.49%

58

Chicago, IL

11.6

-3.45%

29

$19.07

0.63%

52

Charlotte, NC

10.3

-2.91%

37

$17.93

0.78%

45

Kansas City, MO

12.0

-5.83%

11

$14.09

0.07%

72

Denver, CO

11.8

-0.85%

60

$16.88

1.30%

25

Tucson, AZ

9.9

-3.03%

36

$16.76

0.66%

50

Westchester, NY

8.0

-1.25%

55

$35.76

1.03%

32

Oklahoma City, OK

13.7

1.46%

74

$11.35

1.76%

13

Atlanta, GA

14.2

-2.11%

42

$17.21

0.76%

47

Syracuse, NY

15.5

-5.16%

18

$12.55

-0.16%

75

Albuquerque, NM

11.3

0.88%

73

$14.41

1.53%

20

Nashville, TN

8.7

-4.60%

21

$15.39

0.06%

73

Suburban Maryland, MD

9.0

-1.11%

56

$25.18

0.91%

38

13.5

-5.19%

16

$21.00

-0.43%

79

Providence, RI
Miami, FL

San Francisco, CA

Oakland-East Bay, CA
Dayton, OH
Philadelphia, PA

Source: Reis
Multi-Family
Top Commercial RE Markets

Multi-Family

28

Orange County, CA

56

Little Rock, AR

28

Seattle, WA

56

Memphis, TN

29

Charlotte, NC

58

Suburban Maryland, MD

30

Cleveland, OH

59

Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC

Houston, TX

30

Columbia, SC

59

Los Angeles, CA

5

Cincinnati, OH

30

Rochester, NY

61

St. Louis, MO

6

Columbus, OH

33

San Francisco, CA

62

Suburban Virginia, VA

7

Omaha, NE

35

Fort Worth, TX

63

Philadelphia, PA

8

Syracuse, NY

36

Hartford, CT

64

Northern New Jersey, NJ

8

Tacoma, WA

36

Wichita, KS

65

Pittsburgh, PA

10

Orlando, FL

38

Miami, FL

66

Fort Lauderdale, FL

38

Sacramento, CA

67

Birmingham, AL

40

Austin, TX

68

Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA

11

Baltimore, MD

40

Tulsa, OK

69

Indianapolis, IN

11

Jacksonville, FL

70

Westchester, NY

11

Portland, OR

14

San Antonio, TX

15

Phoenix, AZ

16

Minneapolis, MN

17

Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL

18

Dallas, TX

19

Detroit, MI

20

Atlanta, GA

21

Buffalo, NY

22

Charleston, SC

22

Raleigh-Durham, NC

24

Denver, CO

25

Colorado Springs, CO

25

Las Vegas, NV

25

Nashville, TN

1

Oakland-East Bay, CA

2

Greenville, SC

3

San Diego, CA

4

42

Boston, MA

42

Kansas City, MO

71

Milwaukee, WI

42

San Jose, CA

72

Louisville, KY

45

Palm Beach, FL

73

New Orleans, LA

46

Knoxville, TN

74

Central New Jersey, NJ

47

San Bernardino/Riverside, CA

75

Fairfield County, CT

48

Richmond, VA

76

Lexington, KY

48

Tucson, AZ

77

District of Columbia, DC

50

Chicago, IL

78

Chattanooga, TN

51

Oklahoma City, OK

79

New York, NY

52

Providence, RI

80

Long Island, NY

53

New Haven, CT

81

Albuquerque, NM

54

Salt Lake City, UT

82

Dayton, OH

54

Ventura County, CA
Top 5 Ranked Multi-Family Markets
Oakland-East Bay, CA
Vacancy is rock bottom and falling in the 146,345-unit Oakland- East Bay apartment. The second quarter vacancy rate was 2.8%, down
10 basis points from the prior quarter. The Class A vacancy rate was tight at 3.3% but up 10 basis points for the second quarter, while
the Class B/C segment was tighter at 2.5%, down 20 basis points. More than two-thirds of the inventory is Class B/C, and the Class B/C
inventory fell 101 units in the second quarter due to conversion. Net absorption and new supply year-to-date through that month were
609 units and zero. Reis reports 2,066 units under construction. Rent gains are slowing despite slow vacancy. During the second quarter
of 2013 the average asking rent rose 0.7% to $1,450 per month. 1

Greenville, SC
Vacancy is low and rent gains are accelerating in the 34,530-unit Greenville area apartment market. The third quarter vacancy rate is
4.5%, unchanged from the second quarter but down 40 basis points from the fourth quarter of 2012. Vacancy held steady despite the
completion of three projects with 850 units during the third quarter: the 346-unit The Aventine at Greenville, the 260-unit Springs at
Greenville, and the 244-unit The Vinings at Icar Apartments, all located in the South Greenfield submarket. Prior to that surge of new
supply, the second quarter vacancy rate for Class A space was 4.7%, down from 5.6% a year earlier. Class B/C vacancy was 4.2%,
down 120 basis points. New supply is forecast to slow after the banner year of 2013, with an average of just 314 new units per year from
2014 to 2017, but net absorption is forecast to slow as well. New units pushed up the average asking rent, which increased 1.7% during
the third quarter to $696 per month. That was a gain of 2.7% for the first three quarters of 2013 combined. 1

San Diego, CA
The 181,326-unit market-rate, investment-grade San Diego apartment market continues to experience extremely low vacancy and solid
quarterly rental growth. San Diego’s third quarter 2013 vacancy rate was 2.3%, according to Reis, down 20 basis points from the prior
quarter and down 70 from 12 months earlier. Vacancy averaged 3.8% from 2008 to 2012, so this market is extremely tight. Vacancy
rates at or below 5.0% are generally considered to indicate a full market. San Diego has one of the highest occupancy rates in the
country, at 97.7%. San Diego has the fifth highest concentration of people between the ages of 25 to 35 (largest renter age cohort) in the
country, over 484,000 total. Today, nearly half of the households in San Diego county are renting. The third quarter saw 283 units of net
absorption, Reis reports, a healthy figure which brings the year-to-date total to 1,238. The net absorption total for 2012 was 1,584 units,
so 2013 is shaping up as a strong year for demand. Third quarter rent gains were substantial once again, and year over-year gains were
also strong, according to Reis. The average asking rent increased 0.7% to $1,430 per month. The year-over-year gains are 2.7%.1
$1.3 billion in sales

86 Transactions2

Houston, TX
An avalanche of new supply is descending on the Houston apartment sector as the market, free of impediments due to the recession and
riding on the back of robust economic and demographic trends, moves into a defining phase of its new cycle. Indeed, more than 4,300
market-rate apartments completed construction metrowide year-to-date as of mid-August even as some 15,500 others remained under
construction, a large portion of which will arrive on line by the end of the year in a rapidly accelerating succession of deliveries. Demand,
a driving factor, remains strong. While robust development and leasing activities are indicated for much of the metro area, the Energy
Corridor on the west side (and west side submarkets generally), home to much of Houston’s oil and gas business, will see the highest
activity levels. The vacancy rate reached its cyclical peak at 12.9% during the first quarter of 2010. At that point, a robust recovery
commenced. It led, before long, to the heated expansion cycle now underway. Vacancy tells the tale: by the end of the latest quarter the
rate had descended to 6.6%, a decline of 20 basis points for the period, a loss of 110 year-over-year. Moderately positive in 2010, a little
slower in 2011, rent growth soared in 2012 with gains of 4.7% indicated for the asking averages. 1
$3.5 billion in sales

170 Transactions2

Cincinnati, OH
The Vacancy in the 106,296-unit Cincinnati apartment market posted another drop in the second quarter, falling 30 basis points to 3.5%.
That rate is down 120 basis points from 12 months earlier. Class A vacancy finished the quarter at 3.3%, down 40 basis points over the
quarter, while Class B/C vacancy was 3.6%, down 30 basis points from the prior quarter. Cincinnati is still a very tight multifamily market,
with net absorption running ahead of demand. From 2008 to 2012, about 2,500 units were completed, but net absorption was over 5,000
during that time span. Reis’s latest construction data lists 592 units completing in five projects so far in 2013, with net absorption at 994
units. Vacancy is forecast to finish 2013 at 3.4%. Reis reports second quarter average asking rents of $754 per month, up 0.5% for the
quarter, and up 2.2% over 12 months.1
$156 million in sales

13 Transactions2

Sources: 1-Reis; 2-Real Capital Analytics
Top Markets: Multi-Family
Metro

RANKS

Q3 2013 % Change
Vac
Vac % Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rank

Asking
Rent $

Oakland-East Bay, CA

2.6

-18.75%

10

Greenville, SC

4.5

-18.18%

San Diego, CA

2.3

-23.33%

Houston, TX

6.4

Cincinnati, OH

%Change Rent
Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13

Rate
Rank

Final
Rank

$1,478

4.30%

5

12

$696

3.42%

12

3

$1,430

2.73%

27

-15.79%

26

$866

4.21%

6

3.5

-23.91%

2

$760

2.56%

33

Columbus, OH

4.6

-19.30%

8

$740

2.64%

29

Omaha, NE

3.1

-16.22%

24

$751

3.16%

17

Tacoma, WA

4.1

-21.15%

4

$812

2.40%

39

Syracuse, NY

2.1

-25.00%

1

$741

2.35%

42

Orlando, FL

5.1

-15.00%

33

$925

3.24%

14

Portland, OR

3.0

-11.76%

41

$916

3.85%

9

Baltimore, MD

3.6

-12.20%

37

$1,095

3.30%

13

Jacksonville, FL

6.8

-17.07%

18

$837

2.57%

32

San Antonio, TX

5.6

-12.50%

35

$780

3.17%

16

Phoenix, AZ

5.4

-16.92%

19

$796

2.45%

35

Minneapolis, MN

2.2

-12.00%

39

$1,039

3.08%

18

Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL

4.5

-18.18%

12

$887

2.31%

46

Dallas, TX

5.0

-12.28%

36

$895

2.87%

23

Detroit, MI

3.8

-17.39%

16

$880

2.33%

44

Atlanta, GA

6.2

-15.07%

32

$894

2.64%

29

Buffalo, NY

2.7

-20.59%

5

$778

2.10%

56

Charleston, SC

4.5

-8.16%

51

$839

3.58%

11

Raleigh-Durham, NC

3.9

-15.22%

31

$874

2.58%

31

Denver, CO

3.7

-7.50%

56

$992

4.20%

7

Nashville, TN

4.3

-6.52%

61

$828

4.68%

3

Colorado Springs, CO

3.8

-15.56%

27

$758

2.43%

37

Las Vegas, NV

5.5

-20.29%

6

$841

2.06%

58

Seattle, WA

4.1

-4.65%

65

$1,180

6.98%

1

Orange County, CA

3.1

-11.43%

42

$1,626

2.85%

24

Charlotte, NC

4.8

-11.11%

44

$868

2.84%

25

Cleveland, OH

3.3

-15.38%

29

$777

2.37%

41

Columbia, SC

6.7

-16.25%

23

$761

2.28%

47

Rochester, NY

3.0

-16.67%

20

$825

2.23%

50

San Francisco, CA

3.1

-3.13%

67

$2,113

4.35%

4

Fort Worth, TX

5.1

-10.53%

45

$776

2.65%

28

Wichita, KS

4.4

-8.33%

50

$554

2.78%

26

Hartford, CT

2.8

-17.65%

14

$1,042

1.96%

62

Miami, FL

3.9

-4.88%

63

$1,157

3.21%

15

Sacramento, CA

3.4

-19.05%

9

$972

1.89%

69

Austin, TX

4.4

0.00%

71

$972

3.96%

8

Tulsa, OK

5.9

-13.24%

34

$618

2.32%

45

Source: Reis

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
10
11
11
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
22
24
25
25
25
28
28
29
30
30
30
33
35
36
36
38
38
40
40
Top Markets: Multi-Family Cont.
Metro

RANKS

Q3 2013
% Change
Vac
Vac % Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rank

Asking
Rent $

%Change Rent
Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13

Rate
Rank

Final
Rank

San Jose, CA

2.9

7.41%

79

$1,743

4.94%

2

Boston, MA

3.8

0.00%

71

$1,879

3.70%

10

Kansas City, MO

4.2

-17.65%

14

$749

1.90%

67

Palm Beach, FL

5.4

-5.26%

62

$1,192

2.94%

21

Knoxville, TN

4.8

-20.00%

7

$626

1.46%

78

San Bernardino/Riverside, CA

3.5

-18.60%

11

$1,092

1.58%

76

Richmond, VA

4.7

-7.84%

53

$839

2.44%

36

Tucson, AZ

5.2

-16.13%

25

$689

1.92%

64

Chicago, IL

3.7

-7.50%

56

$1,139

2.52%

34

Oklahoma City, OK

5.5

-11.29%

43

$594

2.24%

48

Providence, RI

3.0

-16.67%

20

$1,270

1.76%

72

New Haven, CT

2.0

-16.67%

22

$1,169

1.83%

71

Salt Lake City, UT

4.0

2.56%

76

$803

2.95%

20

Ventura County, CA

2.9

-17.14%

17

$1,466

1.24%

79

Little Rock, AR

6.6

6.45%

78

$701

2.94%

21

Memphis, TN

8.2

-11.83%

40

$722

1.98%

59

Suburban Maryland, MD

3.9

-4.88%

63

$1,392

2.43%

37

Los Angeles, CA

3.2

-8.57%

49

$1,480

2.14%

54

Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC

6.0

-15.49%

28

$695

1.61%

75

St. Louis, MO

5.0

-15.25%

30

$769

1.72%

74

Suburban Virginia, VA

3.4

-10.53%

46

$1,597

1.98%

59

Philadelphia, PA

3.6

-7.69%

54

$1,108

2.21%

52

Northern New Jersey, NJ

3.5

-10.26%

47

$1,605

1.97%

61

Pittsburgh, PA

3.0

0.00%

71

$896

2.40%

39

Fort Lauderdale, FL

4.2

-2.33%

69

$1,179

2.34%

43

Birmingham, AL

5.6

-6.67%

60

$762

2.14%

54

Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA

4.1

-6.82%

58

$931

2.08%

57

Indianapolis, IN

5.8

-1.69%

70

$729

2.24%

48

Westchester, NY

3.1

0.00%

71

$1,968

2.23%

50

Milwaukee, WI

3.5

-7.89%

52

$887

1.84%

70

Louisville, KY

4.4

0.00%

71

$699

2.19%

53

New Orleans, LA

6.2

-10.14%

48

$906

1.57%

77

Central New Jersey, NJ

2.7

-3.57%

66

$1,227

1.91%

66

Fairfield County, CT

4.9

-7.55%

55

$1,897

0.48%

83

Lexington, KY

5.5

-6.78%

59

$685

0.59%

82

District of Columbia, DC

4.8

11.63%

81

$1,539

1.92%

64

Chattanooga, TN

4.7

20.51%

83

$680

1.95%

63

New York, NY

2.4

9.09%

80

$3,105

1.90%

67

Long Island, NY

3.3

-2.94%

68

$1,648

0.86%

81

Albuquerque, NM

4.3

13.16%

82

$752

1.76%

72

Dayton, OH

5.5

3.77%

77

$660

1.23%

80

Source: Reis

42
42
42
45
46
47
48
48
50
51
52
53
54
54
56
56
58
59
59
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
Population
Top Commercial RE Markets

Population
55

Birmingham, AL

Oklahoma City, OK

56

San Jose, CA

30

Omaha, NE

57

Cincinnati, OH

Raleigh-Durham, NC

31

Fort Lauderdale, FL

58

Wichita, KS

5

Fort Worth, TX

32

Knoxville, TN

59

New York, NY

6

Orlando, FL

33

Sacramento, CA

60

Baltimore, MD

7

Dallas, TX

34

Jacksonville, FL

61

New Orleans, LA

8

San Antonio, TX

34

Minneapolis, MN

62

Boston, MA

9

Houston, TX

36

Little Rock, AR

63

Northern New Jersey, NJ

10

Las Vegas, NV

36

San Francisco, CA

63

Westchester, NY

38

Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC

65

Miami, FL

39

Kansas City, MO

66

Albuquerque, NM

1

Phoenix, AZ

2

Austin, TX

3

Charlotte, NC

4

27

Greenville, SC

27

Tucson, AZ

29

11

Denver, CO

39

Richmond, VA

67

Chicago, IL

11

Suburban Virginia, VA

39

Tulsa, OK

68

Milwaukee, WI

13

Portland, OR

69

Providence, RI

14

Salt Lake City, UT

42

Memphis, TN

70

New Haven, CT

15

Columbia, SC

43

Louisville, KY

15

District of Columbia, DC

44

Orange County, CA

71

Philadelphia, PA

17

Nashville, TN

44

Tacoma, WA

72

St. Louis, MO

18

Colorado Springs, CO

46

Ventura County, CA

73

Fairfield County, CT

19

Atlanta, GA

47

Columbus, OH

74

Hartford, CT

20

Indianapolis, IN

48

Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA

75

Long Island, NY

20

Lexington, KY

49

Oakland-East Bay, CA

76

Rochester, NY

22

Charleston, SC

50

Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL

77

Dayton, OH

23

Seattle, WA

51

Chattanooga, TN

78

Pittsburgh, PA

24

Palm Beach, FL

52

Los Angeles, CA

79

Syracuse, NY

25

San Diego, CA

53

Suburban Maryland, MD

80

Detroit, MI

54

Central New Jersey, NJ

81

Buffalo, NY

82

Cleveland, OH

26

San Bernardino/Riverside, CA
Top Markets: Population
Metro

RANKS
Population

%Change Pop
Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13

Phoenix, AZ
Austin, TX

4,473,340

2.89%

1,894,800

2.62%

Charlotte, NC

1,880,810

2.22%

Raleigh-Durham, NC

1,761,700

2.20%

Fort Worth, TX

2,270,580

2.05%

Orlando, FL

2,280,330

2.02%

Dallas, TX

4,542,610

2.00%

San Antonio, TX

2,289,320

1.97%

Houston, TX

6,355,060

1.94%

Las Vegas, NV

2,046,290

1.82%

Denver, CO

2,701,560

1.70%

Suburban Virginia, VA

2,805,390

1.70%

Portland, OR

2,338,200

1.69%

Salt Lake City, UT

1,758,110

1.58%

798,950

1.44%

Columbia, SC
District of Columbia, DC

644,160

1.44%

1,673,980

1.41%

680,400

1.40%

Atlanta, GA

5,526,270

1.32%

Indianapolis, IN

Nashville, TN
Colorado Springs, CO

1,828,110

1.29%

Lexington, KY

492,850

1.29%

Charleston, SC

708,380

1.24%

Seattle, WA

2,780,350

1.15%

Palm Beach, FL

1,375,680

1.14%

San Diego, CA

3,221,530

1.13%

San Bernardino/Riverside, CA

4,408,930

1.10%

Greenville, SC

1,146,870

1.07%

Tucson, AZ

1,004,340

1.07%

Oklahoma City, OK

1,313,870

1.05%

898,110

1.04%

1,838,010

1.02%

Omaha, NE
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Knoxville, TN

718,830

1.01%

Sacramento, CA

2,223,920

1.00%

Jacksonville, FL

1,395,180

0.99%

Minneapolis, MN

3,396,360

0.99%

Little Rock, AR

725,930

0.97%

San Francisco, CA

1,843,610

0.97%

Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC

1,389,020

0.92%

Kansas City, MO

2,088,200

0.91%

Richmond, VA

1,297,180

0.91%

962,970

0.91%

Tulsa, OK
Source: Reis

Pop
Rank

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
11
13
14
15
15
17
18
19
20
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
27
29
30
31
32
33
34
34
36
36
38
39
39
39
Top Markets: Population Cont.
Metro

RANKS
Population

%Change Pop
Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13

Memphis, TN

1,348,110

0.90%

Louisville, KY

1,315,660

0.89%

Orange County, CA

3,124,020

0.86%

820,500

0.86%

Tacoma, WA
Ventura County, CA

844,390

0.80%

Columbus, OH

1,896,520

0.77%

Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA

1,711,190

0.74%

Oakland-East Bay, CA

2,658,120

0.71%

Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL

2,863,690

0.69%

Chattanooga, TN

542,420

0.68%

Los Angeles, CA

10,046,350

0.65%

Suburban Maryland, MD

2,383,700

0.64%

Central New Jersey, NJ

2,748,890

0.59%

Birmingham, AL

1,144,220

0.57%

San Jose, CA

1,907,940

0.56%

Cincinnati, OH

2,157,750

0.53%

Wichita, KS

632,180

0.51%

New York, NY

8,805,330

0.50%

Baltimore, MD

2,769,160

0.46%

New Orleans, LA

1,211,730

0.42%

Boston, MA

4,240,990

0.40%

Northern New Jersey, NJ

4,253,690

0.39%

965,870

0.39%

2,600,790

0.38%

Westchester, NY
Miami, FL
Albuquerque, NM

905,070

0.35%

Chicago, IL

7,976,020

0.32%

Milwaukee, WI

1,571,790

0.24%

Providence, RI

1,605,750

0.23%

New Haven, CT

864,530

0.20%

Philadelphia, PA

5,317,990

0.19%

St. Louis, MO

2,851,930

0.17%

935,700

0.12%

Hartford, CT

1,215,140

0.10%

Long Island, NY

2,850,180

0.06%

Rochester, NY

1,056,940

0.01%

979,970

0.00%

2,358,780

-0.02%

660,430

-0.05%

Detroit, MI

4,439,210

-0.07%

Buffalo, NY

1,130,910

-0.23%

Cleveland, OH

2,054,050

-0.36%

Fairfield County, CT

Dayton, OH
Pittsburgh, PA
Syracuse, NY

Source: Reis

Pop
Rank

42
43
44
44
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
63
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
Unemployment
Top Commercial RE Markets

Unemployment
53

Richmond, VA

Colorado Springs, CO

56

Tulsa, OK

30

Syracuse, NY

57

Baltimore, MD

San Jose, CA

31

Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA

58

New Haven, CT

5

Oakland-East Bay, CA

32

Austin, TX

59

Fairfield County, CT

5

San Francisco, CA

33

Dallas, TX

60

District of Columbia, DC

7

Salt Lake City, UT

33

Fort Worth, TX

60

Pittsburgh, PA

8

Palm Beach, FL

35

Houston, TX

60

Suburban Maryland, MD

9

San Diego, CA

36

Indianapolis, IN

60

Suburban Virginia, VA

10

Sacramento, CA

36

Los Angeles, CA

64

St. Louis, MO

38

Long Island, NY

65

Omaha, NE

38

New York, NY

66

Cincinnati, OH

11

Fort Lauderdale, FL

38

Northern New Jersey, NJ

67

Nashville, TN

11

Miami, FL

38

Westchester, NY

67

Wichita, KS

13

Seattle, WA

69

Cleveland, OH

13

Tacoma, WA

15

Orange County, CA

15

San Bernardino/Riverside, CA

17

Ventura County, CA

18

Denver, CO

19

Minneapolis, MN

20

Las Vegas, NV

21

Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC

22

Charlotte, NC

23

Central New Jersey, NJ

24

Portland, OR

25

Raleigh-Durham, NC

1

Orlando, FL

2

Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL

3

Jacksonville, FL

4

27

Buffalo, NY

28

Birmingham, AL

29

Rochester, NY

Detroit, MI

43

Louisville, KY

70

Phoenix, AZ

44

Columbia, SC

71

Oklahoma City, OK

45

Albuquerque, NM

72

Dayton, OH

45

Charleston, SC

73

Columbus, OH

47

Atlanta, GA

73

Knoxville, TN

48

Milwaukee, WI

73

Little Rock, AR

49

San Antonio, TX

73

Tucson, AZ

50

Greenville, SC

77

Boston, MA

51

Lexington, KY

78

Chicago, IL

52

Hartford, CT

79

Chattanooga, TN

53

Philadelphia, PA

80

Memphis, TN

53
26

42

Providence, RI

81

Kansas City, MO

81

New Orleans, LA
Top Markets: Unemployment
Metro

RANKS
MSA

Aug 12 Aug 13 Change Unemp
Unemp Unemp in Unemp Rank

Orlando, FL

Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL

8.6

6.6

-23.26%

Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL

Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL

9.1

7

-23.08%

Jacksonville, FL

Jacksonville, FL

8.6

6.7

-22.09%

San Jose, CA

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA

8.7

6.8

-21.84%

Oakland-East Bay, CA

San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA

8.3

6.5

-21.69%

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA

8.3

6.5

-21.69%

Salt Lake City, UT

Salt Lake City, UT

5.7

4.5

-21.05%

San Diego, CA

San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA

9.2

7.4

-19.57%

Sacramento, CA

Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA

10.4

8.5

-18.27%

Fort Lauderdale, FL

Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL

8.9

7.3

-17.98%

Miami, FL

Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL

8.9

7.3

-17.98%

Palm Beach, FL

Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL

8.9

7.3

-17.98%

Seattle, WA

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA

7.4

6.1

-17.57%

Tacoma, WA

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA

7.4

6.1

-17.57%

Orange County, CA

Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA

12.6

10.4

-17.46%

San Bernardino/Riverside, CA

Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA

12.6

10.4

-17.46%

Ventura County, CA

Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA

12.6

10.4

-17.46%

Denver, CO

Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO

7.8

6.5

-16.67%

Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI

5.6

4.7

-16.07%

Las Vegas, NV

Las Vegas-Paradise, NV

11.4

9.6

-15.79%

Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC Greensboro-High Point, NC

10.2

8.6

-15.69%

Charlotte, NC

Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC

9.8

8.3

-15.31%

Central New Jersey, NJ

Trenton-Ewing, NJ

8.1

6.9

-14.81%

Portland, OR

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

8.3

7.1

-14.46%

Raleigh-Durham, NC

Raleigh-Cary, NC

7.9

6.8

-13.92%

Rochester, NY

Rochester, NY

8

6.9

-13.75%

Buffalo, NY

Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY

8.4

7.3

-13.10%

Birmingham, AL

Birmingham-Hoover, AL

6.9

6

-13.04%

Colorado Springs, CO

Colorado Springs, CO

9.1

8

-12.09%

Syracuse, NY

Syracuse, NY

8.3

7.3

-12.05%

Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA

Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC

6.7

5.9

-11.94%

Austin, TX

Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX

5.9

5.2

-11.86%

Dallas, TX

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX

6.8

6

-11.76%

Fort Worth, TX

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX

6.8

6

-11.76%

Houston, TX

Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX

6.9

6.1

-11.59%

Indianapolis, IN

Indianapolis-Carmel, IN

7.8

6.9

-11.54%

Los Angeles, CA

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA

10.4

9.2

-11.54%

Long Island, NY

New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA

8.9

7.9

-11.24%

New York, NY

New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA

8.9

7.9

-11.24%

Northern New Jersey, NJ

New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA

8.9

7.9

-11.24%

Westchester, NY

New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA

8.9

7.9

-11.24%

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

1
2
3
4
5
5
7
8
9
10
10
10
13
13
15
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
33
35
36
36
38
38
38
38
Top Markets: Unemployment Cont.
Metro

RANKS

MSA

Aug 12
Unemp

Aug 13 Change in Unemp
Unemp Unemp
Rank
9.8
-10.91%
42
7.4
-10.84%
43
7.5
-10.71%
44
6.9
-10.39%
45
6.9
-10.39%
45
8
-10.11%
47
6.9
-9.21%
48
6
-9.09%
49
7.1
-8.97%
50
6.2
-8.82%
51
8.3
-7.78%
52
8.4
-7.69%
53
9.6
-7.69%
53
6
-7.69%
53
5.2
-7.14%
56
7.1
-6.58%
57
8.6
-6.52%
58

Detroit, MI

Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI

11

Louisville, KY

Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN

8.3

Columbia, SC

Columbia, SC

8.4

Albuquerque, NM

Albuquerque, NM

7.7

Charleston, SC

Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC

7.7

Atlanta, GA

Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA

8.9

Milwaukee, WI

Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI

7.6

San Antonio, TX

San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX

6.6

Greenville, SC

Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC

7.8

Lexington, KY

Lexington-Fayette, KY

6.8

Hartford, CT

Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT

Philadelphia, PA

Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD

Providence, RI

Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA Metropolitan

Richmond, VA

Richmond, VA

6.5

Tulsa, OK

Tulsa, OK

5.6

Baltimore, MD

Baltimore-Towson, MD

7.6

New Haven, CT

New Haven, CT Metropolitan NECTA

9.2

Fairfield County, CT

Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Metropolitan

8.1

7.6

-6.17%

59

District of Columbia, DC

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV

5.7

5.4

-5.26%

Pittsburgh, PA

Pittsburgh, PA

7.6

7.2

-5.26%

Suburban Maryland, MD

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV

5.7

5.4

-5.26%

Suburban Virginia, VA

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV

5.7

5.4

-5.26%

St. Louis, MO

St. Louis, MO-IL 1

7.8

7.4

-5.13%

Omaha, NE

Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA

4.4

4.2

-4.55%

Cincinnati, OH

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN

6.9

6.7

-2.90%

Nashville, TN

Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN

7

6.8

-2.86%

Wichita, KS

Wichita, KS

7

6.8

-2.86%

Cleveland, OH

Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH

7.2

7

-2.78%

Phoenix, AZ

Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ

7.6

7.4

-2.63%

Oklahoma City, OK

Oklahoma City, OK

4.8

4.7

-2.08%

Dayton, OH

Dayton, OH

7.4

7.3

-1.35%

Columbus, OH

Columbus, OH

6

6

0.00%

Knoxville, TN

Knoxville, TN

7.1

7.1

0.00%

Little Rock, AR

Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR

6.5

6.5

0.00%

Tucson, AZ

Tucson, AZ

7.7

7.7

0.00%

Boston, MA

Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH Metropolitan

6.1

6.2

1.64%

Chicago, IL

Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI

8.9

9.1

2.25%

Chattanooga, TN

Chattanooga, TN-GA

7.8

8

2.56%

Memphis, TN

Memphis, TN-MS-AR

9.1

9.4

3.30%

Kansas City, MO

Kansas City, MO-KS

6.9

7.2

4.35%

New Orleans, LA

New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA

6.9

7.2

4.35%

60
60
60
60
64
65
66
67
67
69
70
71
72
73
73
73
73
77
78
79
80
81
81

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

9
9.1
10.4
Blue Book
Market Intelligence Report

Market Snapshots
Quarterly quick market updates

Additional Market Research Tools

CBCWorldwide.com
800-222-2162

© 2014 Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC, dba Coldwell Banker Commercial Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Coldwell Banker Commercial
Affiliates fully supports the principles of the Equal Opportunity Act. Each Office is Independently Owned and Operated. Coldwell Banker
Commercial and the Coldwell Banker Commercial Logo are registered service marks owned by Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC.

More Related Content

Similar to Top Commercial Real Estate Markets 2013

State of small business special report recession-ravaged cities
State of small business special report  recession-ravaged citiesState of small business special report  recession-ravaged cities
State of small business special report recession-ravaged citiesRadius
 
AIER_2015_CDI_brochure
AIER_2015_CDI_brochureAIER_2015_CDI_brochure
AIER_2015_CDI_brochureTodd Hoffman
 
2016’s Best & Worst Florida Cities for Finding a Job _ WalletHub®_Kathleen_Hudon
2016’s Best & Worst Florida Cities for Finding a Job _ WalletHub®_Kathleen_Hudon2016’s Best & Worst Florida Cities for Finding a Job _ WalletHub®_Kathleen_Hudon
2016’s Best & Worst Florida Cities for Finding a Job _ WalletHub®_Kathleen_HudonKathleen Suzette Hudon
 
Seven trends impacting retail's future: 2016 Florida Retail Report
Seven trends impacting retail's future: 2016 Florida Retail ReportSeven trends impacting retail's future: 2016 Florida Retail Report
Seven trends impacting retail's future: 2016 Florida Retail ReportJLL
 
There is Something Going on in the LA Tech Market by Upfront Ventures
There is Something Going on in the LA Tech Market by Upfront VenturesThere is Something Going on in the LA Tech Market by Upfront Ventures
There is Something Going on in the LA Tech Market by Upfront VenturesMark Suster
 
2015 Downtown LA Retail Report
2015 Downtown LA Retail Report2015 Downtown LA Retail Report
2015 Downtown LA Retail ReportElan Shore
 
Austin, TX: State of the Economy
Austin, TX: State of the EconomyAustin, TX: State of the Economy
Austin, TX: State of the EconomyCivic Analytics LLC
 
First Financial Bankshares 3rd qtr 2014 Investor Presentation
First Financial Bankshares 3rd qtr 2014 Investor PresentationFirst Financial Bankshares 3rd qtr 2014 Investor Presentation
First Financial Bankshares 3rd qtr 2014 Investor PresentationFirst Financial Bankshares, Inc.
 
Breakfast Forum: The Houston Commercial Real Estate Markets - What's Ahead fo...
Breakfast Forum: The Houston Commercial Real Estate Markets - What's Ahead fo...Breakfast Forum: The Houston Commercial Real Estate Markets - What's Ahead fo...
Breakfast Forum: The Houston Commercial Real Estate Markets - What's Ahead fo...BoyarMiller
 
Consumer Behavior Project A
Consumer Behavior Project AConsumer Behavior Project A
Consumer Behavior Project AWindy May
 
Houston Trends 2014 Slide Deck
Houston Trends 2014 Slide DeckHouston Trends 2014 Slide Deck
Houston Trends 2014 Slide DeckCoy Davidson
 
First Financial Bankshares Investor Presentation 2nd qtr 2014
First Financial Bankshares Investor Presentation 2nd qtr 2014First Financial Bankshares Investor Presentation 2nd qtr 2014
First Financial Bankshares Investor Presentation 2nd qtr 2014First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
 
LAEDC February 2015 Forecast Report
LAEDC February 2015 Forecast ReportLAEDC February 2015 Forecast Report
LAEDC February 2015 Forecast ReportGeorge Entis
 

Similar to Top Commercial Real Estate Markets 2013 (20)

State of small business special report recession-ravaged cities
State of small business special report  recession-ravaged citiesState of small business special report  recession-ravaged cities
State of small business special report recession-ravaged cities
 
2013 Mid Year Blue Book
2013 Mid Year Blue Book2013 Mid Year Blue Book
2013 Mid Year Blue Book
 
Amanda Hoyle Real Estate Presentation 2018
Amanda Hoyle Real Estate Presentation 2018Amanda Hoyle Real Estate Presentation 2018
Amanda Hoyle Real Estate Presentation 2018
 
AIER_2015_CDI_brochure
AIER_2015_CDI_brochureAIER_2015_CDI_brochure
AIER_2015_CDI_brochure
 
2016’s Best & Worst Florida Cities for Finding a Job _ WalletHub®_Kathleen_Hudon
2016’s Best & Worst Florida Cities for Finding a Job _ WalletHub®_Kathleen_Hudon2016’s Best & Worst Florida Cities for Finding a Job _ WalletHub®_Kathleen_Hudon
2016’s Best & Worst Florida Cities for Finding a Job _ WalletHub®_Kathleen_Hudon
 
Seven trends impacting retail's future: 2016 Florida Retail Report
Seven trends impacting retail's future: 2016 Florida Retail ReportSeven trends impacting retail's future: 2016 Florida Retail Report
Seven trends impacting retail's future: 2016 Florida Retail Report
 
ITO 2015
ITO 2015ITO 2015
ITO 2015
 
There is Something Going on in the LA Tech Market by Upfront Ventures
There is Something Going on in the LA Tech Market by Upfront VenturesThere is Something Going on in the LA Tech Market by Upfront Ventures
There is Something Going on in the LA Tech Market by Upfront Ventures
 
2015 Downtown LA Retail Report
2015 Downtown LA Retail Report2015 Downtown LA Retail Report
2015 Downtown LA Retail Report
 
Austin, TX: State of the Economy
Austin, TX: State of the EconomyAustin, TX: State of the Economy
Austin, TX: State of the Economy
 
First Financial Bankshares 3rd qtr 2014 Investor Presentation
First Financial Bankshares 3rd qtr 2014 Investor PresentationFirst Financial Bankshares 3rd qtr 2014 Investor Presentation
First Financial Bankshares 3rd qtr 2014 Investor Presentation
 
Breakfast Forum: The Houston Commercial Real Estate Markets - What's Ahead fo...
Breakfast Forum: The Houston Commercial Real Estate Markets - What's Ahead fo...Breakfast Forum: The Houston Commercial Real Estate Markets - What's Ahead fo...
Breakfast Forum: The Houston Commercial Real Estate Markets - What's Ahead fo...
 
Buckhead Atlanta Brochure
Buckhead Atlanta BrochureBuckhead Atlanta Brochure
Buckhead Atlanta Brochure
 
Consumer Behavior Project A
Consumer Behavior Project AConsumer Behavior Project A
Consumer Behavior Project A
 
First Financial Bankshares 1st qtr 2014 presentation
First Financial Bankshares 1st qtr 2014 presentationFirst Financial Bankshares 1st qtr 2014 presentation
First Financial Bankshares 1st qtr 2014 presentation
 
4th Qtr. Investor Presentation
4th Qtr. Investor Presentation4th Qtr. Investor Presentation
4th Qtr. Investor Presentation
 
Houston Trends 2014 Slide Deck
Houston Trends 2014 Slide DeckHouston Trends 2014 Slide Deck
Houston Trends 2014 Slide Deck
 
First Financial Bankshares Investor Presentation 2nd qtr 2014
First Financial Bankshares Investor Presentation 2nd qtr 2014First Financial Bankshares Investor Presentation 2nd qtr 2014
First Financial Bankshares Investor Presentation 2nd qtr 2014
 
LAEDC February 2015 Forecast Report
LAEDC February 2015 Forecast ReportLAEDC February 2015 Forecast Report
LAEDC February 2015 Forecast Report
 
First financial bankshares 4th qtr 2014 presentation
First financial bankshares 4th qtr 2014 presentationFirst financial bankshares 4th qtr 2014 presentation
First financial bankshares 4th qtr 2014 presentation
 

More from Coldwell Banker Commercial

Coldwell Banker Commercial 2016 Year-End Blue Book
Coldwell Banker Commercial 2016 Year-End Blue BookColdwell Banker Commercial 2016 Year-End Blue Book
Coldwell Banker Commercial 2016 Year-End Blue BookColdwell Banker Commercial
 
Coldwell Banker Commercial - The Dirt on Land Sales White Paper
Coldwell Banker Commercial - The Dirt on Land Sales White PaperColdwell Banker Commercial - The Dirt on Land Sales White Paper
Coldwell Banker Commercial - The Dirt on Land Sales White PaperColdwell Banker Commercial
 
Moving an organization with 1000s of employees
Moving an organization with 1000s of employeesMoving an organization with 1000s of employees
Moving an organization with 1000s of employeesColdwell Banker Commercial
 
Tech-Driven Transformation: Technology Usage & Investment Grows in Commercial...
Tech-Driven Transformation: Technology Usage & Investment Grows in Commercial...Tech-Driven Transformation: Technology Usage & Investment Grows in Commercial...
Tech-Driven Transformation: Technology Usage & Investment Grows in Commercial...Coldwell Banker Commercial
 
A Review of Commercial Real Estate during the first decade of the 21st Century.
A Review of Commercial Real Estate during the first decade of the 21st Century.A Review of Commercial Real Estate during the first decade of the 21st Century.
A Review of Commercial Real Estate during the first decade of the 21st Century.Coldwell Banker Commercial
 
What has changed in Commercial Real Estate over the past 10 years
What has changed in Commercial Real Estate over the past 10 yearsWhat has changed in Commercial Real Estate over the past 10 years
What has changed in Commercial Real Estate over the past 10 yearsColdwell Banker Commercial
 

More from Coldwell Banker Commercial (20)

Coldwell Banker Commercial 2016 Year-End Blue Book
Coldwell Banker Commercial 2016 Year-End Blue BookColdwell Banker Commercial 2016 Year-End Blue Book
Coldwell Banker Commercial 2016 Year-End Blue Book
 
Top 10 cre accounts to follow
Top 10 cre accounts to followTop 10 cre accounts to follow
Top 10 cre accounts to follow
 
#Ff top 10 cbc follows
#Ff top 10 cbc follows#Ff top 10 cbc follows
#Ff top 10 cbc follows
 
Ideas for perfect apartment complex
Ideas for perfect apartment complexIdeas for perfect apartment complex
Ideas for perfect apartment complex
 
Featured listing friday
Featured listing fridayFeatured listing friday
Featured listing friday
 
Coldwell Banker Commercial - The Dirt on Land Sales White Paper
Coldwell Banker Commercial - The Dirt on Land Sales White PaperColdwell Banker Commercial - The Dirt on Land Sales White Paper
Coldwell Banker Commercial - The Dirt on Land Sales White Paper
 
How cicadas affect commercial real estate
How cicadas affect commercial real estateHow cicadas affect commercial real estate
How cicadas affect commercial real estate
 
Go big or go home
Go big or go homeGo big or go home
Go big or go home
 
A view from the top
A view from the topA view from the top
A view from the top
 
Moving an organization with 1000s of employees
Moving an organization with 1000s of employeesMoving an organization with 1000s of employees
Moving an organization with 1000s of employees
 
2012 Year-End Bluebook
2012 Year-End Bluebook2012 Year-End Bluebook
2012 Year-End Bluebook
 
Commercial Real Estate Brand awareness
Commercial Real Estate Brand awarenessCommercial Real Estate Brand awareness
Commercial Real Estate Brand awareness
 
Tech-Driven Transformation: Technology Usage & Investment Grows in Commercial...
Tech-Driven Transformation: Technology Usage & Investment Grows in Commercial...Tech-Driven Transformation: Technology Usage & Investment Grows in Commercial...
Tech-Driven Transformation: Technology Usage & Investment Grows in Commercial...
 
2012 Mid-Year Blue Book
2012 Mid-Year Blue Book2012 Mid-Year Blue Book
2012 Mid-Year Blue Book
 
2012 CBC Market Review: Blue Book
2012 CBC Market Review: Blue Book2012 CBC Market Review: Blue Book
2012 CBC Market Review: Blue Book
 
2011 Mid Year Blue Book
2011 Mid Year Blue Book2011 Mid Year Blue Book
2011 Mid Year Blue Book
 
2011 NREI Beyond Core Markets Survey
2011 NREI Beyond Core Markets Survey2011 NREI Beyond Core Markets Survey
2011 NREI Beyond Core Markets Survey
 
CBC Blue Book Market Review
CBC Blue Book Market ReviewCBC Blue Book Market Review
CBC Blue Book Market Review
 
A Review of Commercial Real Estate during the first decade of the 21st Century.
A Review of Commercial Real Estate during the first decade of the 21st Century.A Review of Commercial Real Estate during the first decade of the 21st Century.
A Review of Commercial Real Estate during the first decade of the 21st Century.
 
What has changed in Commercial Real Estate over the past 10 years
What has changed in Commercial Real Estate over the past 10 yearsWhat has changed in Commercial Real Estate over the past 10 years
What has changed in Commercial Real Estate over the past 10 years
 

Recently uploaded

The Gale at Godrej Park World Hinjewadi Pune Brochure.pdf
The Gale at Godrej Park World Hinjewadi Pune Brochure.pdfThe Gale at Godrej Park World Hinjewadi Pune Brochure.pdf
The Gale at Godrej Park World Hinjewadi Pune Brochure.pdfPrachiRudram
 
BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...
BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...
BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...ApartmentWala1
 
2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)
2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)
2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)Delhi Call girls
 
Parksville 96 Surrey Floor Plans May 2024
Parksville 96 Surrey Floor Plans May 2024Parksville 96 Surrey Floor Plans May 2024
Parksville 96 Surrey Floor Plans May 2024VickyAulakh1
 
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 1 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 1 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 1 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 1 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhidelhimodel235
 
Bridge & Elliot Ladner Floor Plans May 2024.pdf
Bridge & Elliot Ladner Floor Plans May 2024.pdfBridge & Elliot Ladner Floor Plans May 2024.pdf
Bridge & Elliot Ladner Floor Plans May 2024.pdfVickyAulakh1
 
Cheap Rate ✨➥9711108085▻✨Call Girls In Amar Colony (Delhi)
Cheap Rate ✨➥9711108085▻✨Call Girls In Amar Colony (Delhi)Cheap Rate ✨➥9711108085▻✨Call Girls In Amar Colony (Delhi)
Cheap Rate ✨➥9711108085▻✨Call Girls In Amar Colony (Delhi)delhi24hrs1
 
Yedi Mavi TOBB Zeytinburnu - Listing Turkey
Yedi Mavi TOBB Zeytinburnu - Listing TurkeyYedi Mavi TOBB Zeytinburnu - Listing Turkey
Yedi Mavi TOBB Zeytinburnu - Listing TurkeyListing Turkey
 
Call Girls In Seelampur Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...
Call Girls In Seelampur  Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...Call Girls In Seelampur  Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...
Call Girls In Seelampur Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...asmaqueen5
 
David Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate Success
David Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate SuccessDavid Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate Success
David Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate SuccessDavid Litt
 
Ganga Platinum Kharadi Pune brochure.pdf
Ganga Platinum Kharadi Pune brochure.pdfGanga Platinum Kharadi Pune brochure.pdf
Ganga Platinum Kharadi Pune brochure.pdfsabhyara24
 
Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best in D...
Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best  in D...Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best  in D...
Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best in D...asmaqueen5
 
MEQ Mainstreet Equity Corp Q2 2024 Investor Presentation
MEQ Mainstreet Equity Corp Q2 2024 Investor PresentationMEQ Mainstreet Equity Corp Q2 2024 Investor Presentation
MEQ Mainstreet Equity Corp Q2 2024 Investor PresentationMEQ - Mainstreet Equity Corp.
 
Goa Call Girls 8617370543 Call Girls In Goa By Russian Call Girl in goa
Goa Call Girls 8617370543 Call Girls In Goa By Russian Call Girl in goaGoa Call Girls 8617370543 Call Girls In Goa By Russian Call Girl in goa
Goa Call Girls 8617370543 Call Girls In Goa By Russian Call Girl in goaNitya salvi
 
Acibadem Konaklari Uskudar - Listin Turkey
Acibadem Konaklari Uskudar - Listin TurkeyAcibadem Konaklari Uskudar - Listin Turkey
Acibadem Konaklari Uskudar - Listin TurkeyListing Turkey
 
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)Delhi Call girls
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 57 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 57 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 57 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 57 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceDelhi Call girls
 
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 2 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 2 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 2 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 2 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhidelhimodel235
 
9990771857 Call Girls Dwarka Sector 9 Delhi (Call Girls ) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls Dwarka Sector 9 Delhi (Call Girls ) Delhi9990771857 Call Girls Dwarka Sector 9 Delhi (Call Girls ) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls Dwarka Sector 9 Delhi (Call Girls ) Delhidelhimodel235
 
Kolte Patil Kharadi Pune E Brochure.pdf
Kolte Patil Kharadi Pune E  Brochure.pdfKolte Patil Kharadi Pune E  Brochure.pdf
Kolte Patil Kharadi Pune E Brochure.pdfabbu831446
 

Recently uploaded (20)

The Gale at Godrej Park World Hinjewadi Pune Brochure.pdf
The Gale at Godrej Park World Hinjewadi Pune Brochure.pdfThe Gale at Godrej Park World Hinjewadi Pune Brochure.pdf
The Gale at Godrej Park World Hinjewadi Pune Brochure.pdf
 
BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...
BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...
BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...
 
2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)
2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)
2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)
 
Parksville 96 Surrey Floor Plans May 2024
Parksville 96 Surrey Floor Plans May 2024Parksville 96 Surrey Floor Plans May 2024
Parksville 96 Surrey Floor Plans May 2024
 
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 1 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 1 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 1 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 1 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
 
Bridge & Elliot Ladner Floor Plans May 2024.pdf
Bridge & Elliot Ladner Floor Plans May 2024.pdfBridge & Elliot Ladner Floor Plans May 2024.pdf
Bridge & Elliot Ladner Floor Plans May 2024.pdf
 
Cheap Rate ✨➥9711108085▻✨Call Girls In Amar Colony (Delhi)
Cheap Rate ✨➥9711108085▻✨Call Girls In Amar Colony (Delhi)Cheap Rate ✨➥9711108085▻✨Call Girls In Amar Colony (Delhi)
Cheap Rate ✨➥9711108085▻✨Call Girls In Amar Colony (Delhi)
 
Yedi Mavi TOBB Zeytinburnu - Listing Turkey
Yedi Mavi TOBB Zeytinburnu - Listing TurkeyYedi Mavi TOBB Zeytinburnu - Listing Turkey
Yedi Mavi TOBB Zeytinburnu - Listing Turkey
 
Call Girls In Seelampur Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...
Call Girls In Seelampur  Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...Call Girls In Seelampur  Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...
Call Girls In Seelampur Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...
 
David Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate Success
David Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate SuccessDavid Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate Success
David Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate Success
 
Ganga Platinum Kharadi Pune brochure.pdf
Ganga Platinum Kharadi Pune brochure.pdfGanga Platinum Kharadi Pune brochure.pdf
Ganga Platinum Kharadi Pune brochure.pdf
 
Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best in D...
Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best  in D...Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best  in D...
Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best in D...
 
MEQ Mainstreet Equity Corp Q2 2024 Investor Presentation
MEQ Mainstreet Equity Corp Q2 2024 Investor PresentationMEQ Mainstreet Equity Corp Q2 2024 Investor Presentation
MEQ Mainstreet Equity Corp Q2 2024 Investor Presentation
 
Goa Call Girls 8617370543 Call Girls In Goa By Russian Call Girl in goa
Goa Call Girls 8617370543 Call Girls In Goa By Russian Call Girl in goaGoa Call Girls 8617370543 Call Girls In Goa By Russian Call Girl in goa
Goa Call Girls 8617370543 Call Girls In Goa By Russian Call Girl in goa
 
Acibadem Konaklari Uskudar - Listin Turkey
Acibadem Konaklari Uskudar - Listin TurkeyAcibadem Konaklari Uskudar - Listin Turkey
Acibadem Konaklari Uskudar - Listin Turkey
 
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 57 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 57 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 57 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 57 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 2 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 2 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 2 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 2 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
 
9990771857 Call Girls Dwarka Sector 9 Delhi (Call Girls ) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls Dwarka Sector 9 Delhi (Call Girls ) Delhi9990771857 Call Girls Dwarka Sector 9 Delhi (Call Girls ) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls Dwarka Sector 9 Delhi (Call Girls ) Delhi
 
Kolte Patil Kharadi Pune E Brochure.pdf
Kolte Patil Kharadi Pune E  Brochure.pdfKolte Patil Kharadi Pune E  Brochure.pdf
Kolte Patil Kharadi Pune E Brochure.pdf
 

Top Commercial Real Estate Markets 2013

  • 1. 2013 Blue Book Top Commercial Real Estate Markets Market Comparison Report
  • 2. The Coldwell Banker Commercial® brand took on the task of finding the ‘Top Markets’ for Commercial Real Estate. Over 80 markets were ranked on 2 categories for each property sector (Office, Retail, Multi-Family), then 2 additional final categories: 1) % Change in Vacancy from Q3 2012 and Q3 2013 within the market1 2) % Change in Rental Rates from Q3 2012 and Q3 2013 within the market1 3) % Change in Population from Q3 2012 and Q3 2013 within the market1 4) % Change in Unemployment from Aug 2012 and Aug 2013 within the market2 1– source: Reis 2—source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • 3. Top Commercial RE Markets 1 Orlando, FL Total 26 Nashville, TN 55 Columbia, SC 27 Fort Lauderdale, FL 28 Tacoma, WA 56 New Haven, CT 2 Portland, OR 3 Dallas, TX 29 Knoxville, TN 57 Kansas City, MO 4 Houston, TX 30 Colorado Springs, CO 58 Suburban Virginia, VA 5 Minneapolis, MN 31 Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 59 Syracuse, NY 6 San Diego, CA 32 Columbus, OH 60 Little Rock, AR 7 Austin, TX 33 Richmond, VA 61 Detroit, MI 8 Raleigh-Durham, NC 34 Tulsa, OK 62 Birmingham, AL 9 Fort Worth, TX 35 Baltimore, MD 63 Chicago, IL 36 Omaha, NE 64 Memphis, TN 10 Denver, CO 37 Indianapolis, IN 65 Fairfield County, CT 38 Miami, FL 66 District of Columbia, DC 11 Orange County, CA 39 Hartford, CT 67 Pittsburgh, PA 12 Seattle, WA 40 Central New Jersey, NJ 68 Tucson, AZ 13 Charleston, SC 69 Providence, RI 14 San Jose, CA 41 Boston, MA 70 New Orleans, LA 15 Palm Beach, FL 42 Los Angeles, CA 16 Charlotte, NC 43 San Bernardino/Riverside, CA 71 Suburban Maryland, MD 17 Salt Lake City, UT 44 Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC 72 Lexington, KY 18 Las Vegas, NV 45 Oklahoma City, OK 73 Milwaukee, WI 19 Phoenix, AZ 46 Sacramento, CA 74 Westchester, NY 20 Oakland-East Bay, CA 47 Louisville, KY 75 Philadelphia, PA 21 San Antonio, TX 48 New York, NY 76 Wichita, KS 22 San Francisco, CA 49 Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA 77 Long Island, NY 23 Greenville, SC 50 Rochester, NY 78 Albuquerque, NM 24 Jacksonville, FL 51 Cincinnati, OH 79 St. Louis, MO 25 Atlanta, GA 52 Northern New Jersey, NJ 80 Cleveland, OH 53 Ventura County, CA 81 Dayton, OH 54 Buffalo, NY 82 Chattanooga, TN
  • 4. Top Ranked Market #1 Orlando, FL Metro Orlando, FL Retail Rank MF Rank Office Rank Pop Rank Unemp Rank Cumulative Score Final Rank 2 10 8 6 1 27 1 Why Orlando is Growing Central Florida’s real estate rebound is in full swing with Orlando leading the way. Cranes evidence the downtown Orlando recovery as previously shelved hotel, office and apartment projects are resurrected. The Dr. Phillips Center for the Performing Arts opens Fall 2014 and an 18,000-seat Major League Soccer stadium will accommodate Orlando’s new MLS franchise. Orlando is still the top tourist destination in the world and will host a record 56+ million visitors and generate $50 billion in economic impact in 2013; with expansions like Disney’s Avatar, Magic Kingdom, Downtown Disney and The Wizarding World of Harry Potter at Universal 2014, visitation is expected to exceed 63 million and bring an additional $1.3 billion of new business. Burgeoning Lake Nona Medical City is home to such facilities as the Nemour Children’s Hospital, UCF’s Health Sciences Campus, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute and VA Hospital; by 2017 “Medical City” is expected to create 30,000 jobs and $7.6 billion in economic impact. To accommodate Orlando’s population and tourism growth, Orlando International Airport is preparing for a $1.1 billion expansion to host an estimated 45 million travelers by 2020. SunRail will begin service in Spring 2014; running 61 miles from Volusia to Osceola County linking Central Florida together and eventually connecting with “All Aboard Florida” which will run from Orlando to Miami and South Florida. SunRail is expected to generate over 261,000 jobs and $8.8 billion in economic impact over 30 years. The sun and the economic outlook are shining bright in Orlando. Paul Hoffman, Coldwell Banker Commercial NRT, Orlando, FL
  • 5. Top Markets: Rankings Metro Orlando, FL Portland, OR Dallas, TX Houston, TX Minneapolis, MN San Diego, CA Austin, TX Raleigh-Durham, NC Fort Worth, TX Denver, CO Orange County, CA Seattle, WA Charleston, SC San Jose, CA Palm Beach, FL Charlotte, NC Salt Lake City, UT Las Vegas, NV Phoenix, AZ Oakland-East Bay, CA San Antonio, TX San Francisco, CA Greenville, SC Jacksonville, FL Atlanta, GA Nashville, TN Fort Lauderdale, FL Tacoma, WA Knoxville, TN Colorado Springs, CO Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL Columbus, OH Richmond, VA Tulsa, OK Baltimore, MD Miami, FL Omaha, NE Indianapolis, IN Hartford, CT Central New Jersey, NJ Boston, MA Source: Reis Retail Rank 2 MF Rank 10 Office Rank 8 Pop Unemp Cumulative Final Available Rank Rank Score Rank Properties View Listings 6 1 27 1 22 11 5 13 24 75 7 18 16 7 33 81 10 4 23 9 35 81 4 16 9 34 19 82 18 3 28 25 9 83 3 40 7 2 32 84 11 22 25 4 25 87 5 35 13 5 33 91 45 24 3 11 18 101 16 28 1 44 15 104 28 28 18 23 13 110 25 22 4 22 45 118 21 42 2 56 4 125 31 45 30 24 10 140 43 29 48 3 22 145 28 54 42 14 7 145 22 25 69 10 20 146 15 15 46 1 70 147 71 1 24 49 5 150 67 14 15 8 49 153 61 33 19 36 5 154 66 2 13 27 50 158 78 11 50 34 3 176 49 20 42 19 47 177 52 25 16 17 67 177 14 66 59 31 10 181 72 8 44 44 13 181 25 46 9 32 73 185 64 25 53 18 29 189 70 17 53 50 2 192 33 6 38 47 73 197 31 48 28 39 53 199 57 40 11 39 56 203 20 11 56 60 57 204 54 38 38 65 10 205 40 7 63 30 65 205 59 69 22 20 36 206 1 36 44 74 52 207 37 17 74 42 20 11 54 62 23 77 208 209 2 3 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 27 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 38 38 37 39 40 41 View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings
  • 6. Quotes from Top 10 Markets Here are a few thoughts from Coldwell Banker Commercial agents on why their market is in the top 10. San Diego, CA San Diego’s economic rebound is surpassing expectations in numerous local markets. Positive trends in unemployment, real estate, tourism and production indicate that the worst of the economic crisis may be over. Downtown is experiencing growth with new high-rise hotels and multifamily developments approved and under construction, along with the $12.8 million expansion project scheduled for Horton Plaza with completion in 2015. Leading the San Diego recovery is the tourism industry, which employs over 160,000 people throughout the County. San Diego is one of the top tourist destinations in Southern California and hosts 32 million visitors each year, generating more than $8 billion annually, which translates to an economic impact of over $18.3 billion dollars generated for the regional economy. Housing prices have increased 10%in the last year and the unemployment rate is holding steady at 7.4%, lower than the State average of 8.9% Brandon Sudweeks, CCIM, Coldwell Banker Commercial Sudweeks Group, San Diego, CA Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis is a city with much opportunity and a city that strives to be a leader in new health solutions, technologies, entertainment, and up-and-coming trends. Because of this, our market is appealing to businesses and families alike. Minneapolis holds 3 professional sports teams, a prominent downtown business college, major corporate offices such as Target Corp. and US Bank, and many present and future construction developments for both residential and commercial. With this brings a steady flow of new jobs, new housing opportunities and new business opportunities. The city’s highly-educated and culturally connected workforce also create much business success. Despite the largeness of Minneapolis as a city, there still tends to be an atmosphere of camaraderie in supporting local businesses and teaming together to make our community better as a whole both economically and socially. Minneapolis’ bordering “twin” city, St. Paul, also brings a wealth of business and opportunities. The Twin Cities together house 19 Fortune 500 Cos., 4 professional sports teams, and many major downtown companies such as those stated above for Minneapolis specific and Ecolab and Securian Financial in St. Paul. Jeffrey L. LaFavre, CCIM, MCR, SIOR, Coldwell Banker Commercial Griffin Companies, Minneapolis, MN
  • 7. Top Markets: Rankings Cont. Metro Los Angeles, CA San Bernardino/Riverside, CA Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC Oklahoma City, OK Sacramento, CA Louisville, KY New York, NY Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA Rochester, NY Cincinnati, OH Northern New Jersey, NJ Ventura County, CA Buffalo, NY Columbia, SC New Haven, CT Kansas City, MO Suburban Virginia, VA Syracuse, NY Little Rock, AR Detroit, MI Birmingham, AL Chicago, IL Memphis, TN Fairfield County, CT District of Columbia, DC Pittsburgh, PA Tucson, AZ Providence, RI New Orleans, LA Suburban Maryland, MD Lexington, KY Milwaukee, WI Westchester, NY Philadelphia, PA Wichita, KS Long Island, NY Albuquerque, NM St. Louis, MO Cleveland, OH Dayton, OH Chattanooga, TN Retail Rank 36 MF Rank 59 Office Rank 32 Pop Rank 52 Unemp Cumulative Rank Score 36 215 63 47 64 26 15 215 57 59 41 38 21 216 47 51 20 29 71 218 67 38 72 33 10 220 13 72 52 43 43 223 45* 79 5 59 38 226 11 68 70 48 31 228 37 30 60 76 26 229 25 5 79 57 66 232 9 64 62 63 38 236 41 54 80 46 17 238 78 21 32 81 27 239 77 30 74 15 44 240 22 53 38 70 58 241 44 42 37 39 81 243 35 62 76 11 60 244 50 8 78 79 30 245 54 56 27 36 73 246 64 19 55 80 42 260 37 67 75 55 28 262 41 50 26 67 78 262 7 56 77 42 80 262 6 75 51 73 59 264 53* 77 61 15 60 266 28 65 35 78 60 266 46 48 81 27 73 275 54 52 48 69 53 276 19 73 46 61 81 280 52 58 57 53 60 280 76 76 58 20 51 281 62 71 32 68 48 281 47 70 71 63 38 289 72 63 31 71 53 290 69 36 67 58 67 297 33 80 72 75 38 298 50 81 68 66 45 310 60 61 66 72 64 323 80 30 64 82 69 325 72 75 82 78 36 82 77 51 72 79 339 365 Final Rank Available Properties 42 42 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 62 62 65 66 66 68 69 70 70 72 72 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings View Listings * -NY & Washington, DC data was not available for Retail Sector. An average of the other rankings was given so a final rank could be achieved; Source: Reis
  • 8. Rebuttals from Bottom Markets With any survey, the results will depend on what variables you look at and how you look at them. That’s why we gave a few markets ranked in the bottom 10 a chance to talk about the positives in their market. New Orleans, LA By almost all accounts, Greater New Orleans is a great place to do business. In economic development, we are at the highest point, in every economic ranking, in our history. Greater New Orleans was recently ranked #2 “Boomtown in America”, due to population and GDP growth. Just last week, the region was ranked #6 for creating middle-income jobs in the USA by Forbes. Encouragingly, talented people are voting with their feet, choosing this region to build a career and start a family. In fact, Louisiana has enjoyed five straight years of net in-migration for the first time in decades, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. New Orleans grew faster than any other major U.S. city in the 15 months after the 2010 decennial headcount. And as more and more people make New Orleans their home, their talents come with them, evidenced by the city's No. 1 ranking on the list of "America's Biggest Brain Magnets" for attracting people under 25 with college degrees, according to Forbes. Mark Inman, CCIM, Coldwell Banker Commercial TEC, New Orleans, LA Birmingham, AL Birmingham has the following positives: UAB Medical Center, University and Medical School continues to grow, growing employment and bringing medical research dollars to the economy. Birmingham is a regional retail center offering retail goods and services for Central Alabama. The Birmingham MSA offers shopping choices only found in Birmingham for most of the State's residence, supporting expansion of retail goods and services. Political structure of the MSA creates competition between Cities in the MSA for new development, encouraging more public / private investments. Birmingham's CBD is going through a renaissance with new development in sports, office, retail and residential development. Birmingham is the interchange center of four major interstates connecting it to major cites in Tennessee, Georgia, Mississippi and Florida, coupled with multiple converging rail lines makes the MSA an excellent distribution center. Birmingham is a solid community with a great infrastructure designed for growth. Wesley Cline, CCIM, Coldwell Banker Commercial Moore Company Realty, Birmingham, AL Chicago, IL Chicago is one of most dynamic cities in the world. Chicago has a population of 9.5 million people, 4 million culturally diverse employees and 265,000 businesses. It has over 400 major corporate headquarters including 29 Fortune 500 companies. Chicago is a leader in a number of key industries including: Business & Financial Services, Manufacturing, Information Technology, Health Services and Transportation & Distribution, and is a global leader in options, futures and derivatives trading. The commercial real estate market is also one of the largest and most active in the world. The industrial market consists of 1.15 billion SF of space with only an 8.8% vacancy rate. The office market consists of 460 million SF with a current vacancy of 14.1%. The retail market consists of 262 million SF with a vacancy of only 7.1%. Jordan Schnoll, CCIM , Coldwell Banker Commercial NRT, Chicago, IL
  • 10. Top Commercial RE Markets OFFICE 1 Orange County, CA 28 San Diego, CA 56 Baltimore, MD 2 San Jose, CA 30 Palm Beach, FL 57 Suburban Maryland, MD 3 Denver, CO 31 Philadelphia, PA 58 Lexington, KY 4 Charleston, SC 32 Buffalo, NY 59 Fort Lauderdale, FL 5 New York, NY 32 Los Angeles, CA 60 Rochester, NY 5 Portland, OR 32 Milwaukee, WI 61 District of Columbia, DC 7 Austin, TX 35 Pittsburgh, PA 62 Northern New Jersey, NJ 8 Orlando, FL 36 Dayton, OH 63 Omaha, NE 9 Knoxville, TN 37 Kansas City, MO 64 Cleveland, OH 9 Minneapolis, MN 38 Columbus, OH 64 San Bernardino/Riverside, CA 38 Miami, FL 66 St. Louis, MO 38 New Haven, CT 67 Wichita, KS 68 Albuquerque, NM 11 Boston, MA 11 Tulsa, OK 13 Fort Worth, TX 41 Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC 69 Las Vegas, NV 13 Greenville, SC 42 Atlanta, GA 70 Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA 15 San Antonio, TX 42 Salt Lake City, UT 16 Dallas, TX 44 Hartford, CT 71 Westchester, NY 16 Nashville, TN 44 Tacoma, WA 72 Long Island, NY 18 Seattle, WA 46 New Orleans, LA 72 Sacramento, CA 19 San Francisco, CA 46 Phoenix, AZ 74 Columbia, SC 20 Central New Jersey, NJ 48 Charlotte, NC 75 Birmingham, AL 20 Oklahoma City, OK 48 Providence, RI 76 Suburban Virginia, VA 22 Indianapolis, IN 50 Jacksonville, FL 77 Memphis, TN 23 Houston, TX 51 Fairfield County, CT 78 Syracuse, NY 24 Oakland-East Bay, CA 52 Louisville, KY 79 Cincinnati, OH 25 Raleigh-Durham, NC 53 Colorado Springs, CO 80 Ventura County, CA 53 Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 81 Tucson, AZ 55 Detroit, MI 82 Chattanooga, TN 26 Chicago, IL 27 Little Rock, AR 28 Richmond, VA
  • 11. Top 5 Ranked Office Markets Orange County, CA Reis’s data show the Orange County general purpose, multi-tenant office market in the throes of a substantial recovery. While still elevated relative to pre-recession levels, the vacancy rate is declining amid strong absorption and minimal speculative development. And while current average lease rates remain well below those seen prior to the downturn, growth, albeit in modest proportion, has returned to rents. The market’s Achilles heel in the recent downturn was the large mortgage industry tenant base, which led the sector’s decline during the recession. The wound has healed: strength in the mortgage sector, reflecting the housing rebound, has been a factor in the market’s turnaround. Leasing has been strong and absorption numbers have been high. 1 YTD $1.1 billion in sales 55 Transactions2 San Jose, CA Reflecting the strong local economy and the expanding high technology Business sector, the Silicon Valley general purpose, multitenant office market shows considerable strength. Demand has been strong; a new development cycle is underway. By Reis’s count, net absorption through the first half of the year accompanied by 817,000 SF of new supply was 766,000 SF. While still elevated, vacancy has been declining persuasively. The rate for the second quarter was 18.8%, down 30 basis points for the period, down 110 year-over-year. The positive performance seen in July-August took 20 additional points from the rate. On the other hand, major employers such as Google, Apple and Salesforce have already taken space sufficient to accommodate several years of growth. Rents are high; growth has been strong. At $31.45 psf, second quarter asking averages were up 1.6% each for the period following gains of about 1.0% in the first quarter. Ranked the #2 market in this survey for rate change. A rapid depletion of Class A blocks of space over the last 24 months encourages development. 1 YTD $2.3 billion in sales 67 Transactions2 Denver, CO According to Reis, 2013 was “a break out year” for the Denver area office market, citing the strong local economy, rising rents, and the return of construction. Leasing has “returned to normal”—“normal” being pre-recession activity levels. In addition, several sources report increasing employment in office-using sectors. Net absorption has been strongly positive since 2011, the vacancy rate has fallen to its lowest point since early 2009, and rates of rent growth, albeit gradually, are increasing. Led by downtown Denver and areas on its periphery, moreover, substantial volumes of new office space were under construction and planned per the date of this report. While most of the current building activity is build-to-suit, speculative development, following a prolonged absence, is beginning to reappear. While a deluge of supply is not expected, spec construction should be a visible trend in the period ahead. Investment, charged by several major recent sales, has been very strong in recent quarters. 1 YTD $1.7 billion in sales 79 Transactions2 Charleston, SC The Charleston area market grows tighter. Absorption has remained positive because there is a diminishing availability of quality space. By Reis’s count, second quarter vacancy was 15.6%, down 100 basis points for the period, down 180 year-over-year. The Class A rate, however, was considerably lower at 13.0%, a decline of fully 260 basis points for the quarter alone, a loss of 350 yearover-year. This was the #1 ranked market in this survey for change in vacancy for office. The volume of vacant Class A space had shrunk to only 551,000 SF by the end of the quarter. Absorption, accordingly, is dominated by this sector. With no space completing construction through the first half of the year, total metro area net absorption was counted by Reis at 96,000 SF. The Class A total was 117,000. Technology continued to be the primary driver of tenant demand Boeing has purchased the 178,000 SF Applied Technology Research Center for expansion, thus displacing The South Carolina Research Authority which will be relocating its headquarters to Mead Westvaco’s 4,500-acre Nexton mixed-use development in Summerville for a 75,000 SF built-to-suit.1 New York, NY The 354-million-SF general purpose, multi-tenant Manhattan office is a moderate success by the standards of the past, but in a boom mode by the standards of the present. Despite the completion of extensive new space the vacancy rate remained in the single digits in the third quarter of 2013, and rents increased at about the same pace as has been common since the recovery began in 2011. What is most encouraging is that the office market is solid even though the city’s leading sector—finance—continues to downsize. Reis predicts that 17.5 million SF of new space will be added within its Manhattan submarkets from 2013 to 2017. While that would constitute the largest building boom since the 1980s, it would only restore the size of the inventory to its level during the mid-1990s, and even then only if there are no more office-to-residential or hotel conversions. 1 YTD $16.4 billion in sales 148 Transactions2 Sources: 1-Reis; 2-Real Capital Analytics
  • 12. Top Markets: OFFICE Metro RANKS Q3 2013 % Change Vac % Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Vac Rank Asking %Change Rent Rate Rent $ Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rank Final Rank Orange County, CA 17.3 -8.95% 4 $27.45 2.20% 9 San Jose, CA 18.6 -5.10% 18 $31.68 5.28% 2 Denver, CO 17.5 -6.91% 11 $22.14 1.98% 12 Charleston, SC 15.3 -10.53% 1 $21.49 1.42% 23 New York, NY 9.7 -3.96% 24 $61.16 4.62% 3 Portland, OR 13.6 -8.72% 5 $21.84 1.58% 22 Austin, TX 16.4 -4.09% 23 $26.58 2.47% 6 Orlando, FL 18.2 -4.71% 21 $21.43 2.05% 10 Minneapolis, MN 17.3 -4.95% 19 $22.33 1.64% 19 Knoxville, TN 14.3 -10.06% 3 $16.02 1.14% 35 Boston, MA 13.9 -3.47% 26 $37.04 1.95% 14 Tulsa, OK 17.2 -7.03% 10 $14.79 1.23% 30 Greenville, SC 19.2 -3.03% 31 $16.85 2.00% 11 Fort Worth, TX 16.3 -5.23% 17 $19.63 1.39% 25 San Antonio, TX 18.0 -5.26% 16 $20.25 1.20% 31 Dallas, TX 23.1 -1.28% 43 $20.26 3.16% 5 Nashville, TN 12.8 -7.25% 8 $20.33 0.99% 40 Seattle, WA 13.7 -2.84% 33 $29.86 1.88% 16 San Francisco, CA 13.3 -0.75% 49 $43.69 7.72% 1 Central New Jersey, NJ 21.8 -5.63% 15 $23.98 1.05% 37 Oklahoma City, OK 16.8 -10.16% 2 $15.00 0.81% 50 Indianapolis, IN 19.2 -5.88% 14 $17.91 1.02% 39 Houston, TX 14.2 -0.70% 50 $25.67 4.35% 4 Oakland-East Bay, CA 17.9 -3.24% 29 $26.26 1.27% 28 Raleigh-Durham, NC 15.1 -6.79% 12 $20.38 0.84% 47 Chicago, IL 18.7 0.00% 54 $27.98 2.30% 7 Little Rock, AR 12.2 -7.58% 7 $15.79 0.77% 55 San Diego, CA 16.3 -2.98% 32 $28.59 1.20% 31 Richmond, VA 14.8 -3.27% 28 $18.57 1.14% 35 Palm Beach, FL 19.1 -5.91% 13 $28.40 0.78% 54 Philadelphia, PA 14.1 -7.24% 9 $24.79 0.65% 59 Los Angeles, CA 15.8 0.00% 54 $32.76 1.64% 18 Milwaukee, WI 18.8 -1.05% 46 $19.11 1.38% 26 Buffalo, NY 14.2 -8.39% 6 $17.02 0.41% 66 Pittsburgh, PA 15.7 1.29% 61 $21.13 1.98% 12 Dayton, OH 26.6 -2.56% 34 $14.62 0.97% 41 Kansas City, MO 17.3 0.00% 54 $19.27 1.42% 23 Columbus, OH 18.7 1.08% 59 $18.09 1.63% 20 New Haven, CT 17.8 -2.20% 36 $20.83 0.92% 43 Miami, FL 16.9 -3.43% 27 $30.45 0.79% 52 Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC 20.9 -1.88% 40 $16.42 0.92% 43 Source: Reis 1 2 3 4 5 5 7 8 9 9 11 11 13 13 15 16 16 18 19 20 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28 30 31 32 32 32 35 36 37 38 38 38 41
  • 13. Top Markets: OFFICE Cont. Metro RANKS Q3 2013 % Change Vac % Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Vac Rank Asking %Change Rent Rate Rent $ Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rank Final Rank Atlanta, GA 20.3 -1.46% 42 $21.64 0.93% 42 Salt Lake City, UT 17.3 -2.26% 35 $18.43 0.82% 49 Hartford, CT 21.4 2.88% 65 $21.29 1.62% 20 Tacoma, WA 16.0 -3.61% 25 $20.17 0.60% 60 New Orleans, LA 13.4 3.88% 71 $18.40 1.88% 15 Phoenix, AZ 25.6 -0.78% 48 $22.52 1.03% 38 Charlotte, NC 17.8 9.20% 79 $21.91 2.29% 8 Providence, RI 15.6 -1.89% 39 $20.57 0.83% 48 Jacksonville, FL 20.8 0.48% 58 $18.52 1.15% 34 Fairfield County, CT 22.5 5.14% 76 $34.78 1.70% 17 Louisville, KY 15.7 2.61% 64 $16.36 1.24% 29 Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 22.2 3.26% 67 $21.33 1.28% 27 Colorado Springs, CO 19.4 -4.90% 20 $16.49 0.00% 74 Detroit, MI 25.8 -1.53% 41 $18.99 0.74% 57 Baltimore, MD 16.4 -4.65% 22 $23.40 -0.17% 77 Suburban Maryland, MD 15.2 -0.65% 51 $28.23 0.79% 52 Lexington, KY 15.5 -3.13% 30 $17.07 -0.12% 75 Fort Lauderdale, FL 19.7 -1.99% 38 $25.52 0.08% 70 Rochester, NY 16.9 -1.17% 44 $16.29 0.43% 65 District of Columbia, DC 9.6 3.23% 66 $50.13 0.89% 45 Northern New Jersey, NJ 18.8 -1.05% 46 $27.81 0.32% 67 Omaha, NE 15.7 3.29% 68 $17.27 0.88% 46 Cleveland, OH 24.0 15.94% 82 $18.69 1.19% 33 San Bernardino/Riverside, CA 24.0 -2.04% 37 $21.28 -0.23% 78 St. Louis, MO 17.9 -0.56% 52 $20.55 0.44% 64 Wichita, KS 17.7 1.72% 62 $14.33 0.77% 55 Albuquerque, NM 18.1 4.02% 72 $16.25 0.81% 50 Las Vegas, NV 25.9 -1.15% 45 $23.71 -0.42% 80 Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA 15.6 3.31% 69 $19.15 0.74% 57 Westchester, NY 18.7 1.08% 59 $28.56 0.07% 72 Sacramento, CA 21.3 1.91% 63 $23.71 0.08% 70 Long Island, NY 13.9 0.00% 54 $26.81 -0.37% 79 Columbia, SC 18.3 -0.54% 53 $15.94 -0.75% 82 Birmingham, AL 13.2 4.76% 74 $19.12 0.53% 62 Suburban Virginia, VA 17.0 7.59% 78 $32.09 0.60% 60 Memphis, TN 23.7 4.87% 75 $18.24 0.50% 63 Syracuse, NY 16.3 4.49% 73 $15.97 0.31% 68 Cincinnati, OH 20.8 3.48% 70 $18.69 0.05% 73 Ventura County, CA 17.3 9.49% 80 $24.25 0.21% 69 Tucson, AZ 15.2 7.04% 77 $21.41 -0.14% 76 Chattanooga, TN 16.9 12.67% 81 $14.72 -0.54% 81 Source: Reis 42 42 44 44 46 46 48 48 50 51 52 53 53 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 64 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 72 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
  • 15. Top Commercial RE Markets Retail 2 Orlando, FL 3 Austin, TX 4 Minneapolis, MN 5 Fort Worth, TX 6 Fairfield County, CT 7 Dallas, TX 7 Memphis, TN 9 Northern New Jersey, NJ 10 Houston, TX 11 Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA 11 Louisville, KY 14 Fort Lauderdale, FL 15 Phoenix, AZ 16 Orange County, CA 17 Boston, MA 18 San Diego, CA 19 New Orleans, LA 20 Baltimore, MD 21 San Jose, CA 22 Las Vegas, NV 22 New Haven, CT 22 Portland, OR 25 Charleston, SC 25 Cincinnati, OH 25 Knoxville, TN 28 Pittsburgh, PA Providence, RI 28 Salt Lake City, UT 28 Seattle, WA 57 Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC 31 Palm Beach, FL 57 Tulsa, OK 31 Richmond, VA 59 Indianapolis, IN 33 Columbus, OH 60 St. Louis, MO 33 Long Island, NY 61 San Francisco, CA 35 Suburban Virginia, VA 62 Milwaukee, WI 36 Los Angeles, CA 63 San Bernardino/Riverside, CA 37 Birmingham, AL 64 Colorado Springs, CO 37 Central New Jersey, NJ 64 Detroit, MI Rochester, NY 66 Greenville, SC 40 Omaha, NE 67 Sacramento, CA 67 San Antonio, TX Raleigh-Durham, NC 13 54 37 1 Hartford, CT 41 Chicago, IL 69 Wichita, KS 41 Ventura County, CA 70 Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 43 Charlotte, NC 44 Kansas City, MO 71 Oakland-East Bay, CA 45 Denver, CO 72 Dayton, OH 46 Tucson, AZ 72 Philadelphia, PA 47 Oklahoma City, OK 72 Tacoma, WA 47 Westchester, NY 75 Chattanooga, TN 49 Atlanta, GA 76 Lexington, KY 50 Albuquerque, NM 77 Columbia, SC 50 Syracuse, NY 78 Buffalo, NY 52 Nashville, TN 78 Jacksonville, FL 52 Suburban Maryland, MD 80 Cleveland, OH 54 Little Rock, AR 54 Miami, FL
  • 16. Top 5 Ranked Retail Markets Hartford, CT The 14.5-million SF Hartford MSA community-neighborhood shopping center market continued to benefit from incremental improvement through two-thirds of 2013. No space of this type has completed construction within Reis submarkets since 2010, and none is under construction. With net absorption at 73,000 SF for 2013 through August, the vacancy rate is down 50 basis points year-to date to 9.5%. The average asking rent increased 0.6% in the second quarter to $17.55 psf. This was the #2 ranked market for rate increase. Additional increases through August brought the gain to 1.1% asking year-to-date. Reis reports a vacancy rate of 6.4% for power centers, down 30 basis points from the prior quarter and 140 from a year earlier. The average asking rent for power centers is $22.31 psf, up 0.5% for the quarter and 2.2% year-over-year.1 $248 million in sales 8 Transactions2 Orlando, FL The sharp recession related cutbacks in residential construction and the collapse of the housing market brought a period of difficulty to the local retail real estate market. Vacancy in the community-neighborhood shopping center retail sector, which peaked at 14.0% as recently as the third quarter of 2012, has only recently begun to subside. By the end of the second quarter of 2013 the level had dropped to 13.1%, a loss of 50 basis points for the quarter alone, a decline of 80 since year-end. This made Orlando the #2 market in % drop in Vacancy. The source of the progress in occupancy since last year was the persistence of positive net absorption in the presence of no new supply deliveries. The absorption total for the first half of 2013 was 252,000 SF. The total for the second quarter alone was 170,000 SF. Growth, at last, has returned to average rents. At $17.62 psf asking averages for the second quarter were up 0.6% for the period following gains of 1.0% for each rate the quarter before. Recent construction, meanwhile, has been dominated by small neighborhood center projects. As of mid-year, Reis was reporting 4.9 million SF of retail space in the planned-proposed pipeline across all product categories.1 $687 million in sales 53 Transactions2 Austin, TX Vacancy is leveling off at a moderate level in Austin’s 20.7-million-SF community-neighborhood shopping center market, but rent gains remain modest. The rate was 6.7% during the second quarter, down 20 basis points for the period as net absorption totaled 81,000 SF and two neighborhood center projects added 58,000 SF within Reis submarkets. After a flat first quarter, rents increased 0.7% in the second quarter. The second quarter asking average was $20.44 psf. Community-neighborhood center development is expected to remain limited, as there is no space currently under construction. Rent gains, however, are expected to pick up. Big-box and mixed-use developments are all the rage in Austin retail. The latest new construction data show three power center projects under construction with 1.9 million SF, three mixed-use projects with 883,400 SF of retail, and three freestanding stores totaling 314,700 SF. For power centers, Reis reports a relatively high second quarter vacancy rate of 7.6%, down 120 basis points from the prior quarter and 100 from a year earlier. The average asking rent for power centers is $24.34 psf, up 0.4% for the quarter and 0.6% from a year earlier. 1 $442 million in sales 33 Transactions2 Minneapolis, MN The 33.6-million SF Minneapolis community neighborhood shopping center market is in balance as of mid-2013, but only due to a near absence of new supply. The vacancy rate fell 20 basis points to 11.1% in the second quarter, when year-to-date net absorption reached 164,000 SF. The 10,800-SF Crossroads Plaza neighborhood center completed construction in Hopkins in April, leaving 213,700 SF of community-neighborhood center space under construction in six projects. The average asking rent increased 0.3% during the quarter, to $17.80 psf. The rate is forecast at 10.8% at year-end 2013, down 70 basis points over the year. 1 $612 million in sales 43 Transactions2 Fort Worth, TX The 28.5-million SF Fort Worth community-neighborhood shopping center market enjoyed positive trends in the first half of 2013, despite competition from the big-box sector. The second quarter 2013 vacancy rate was 12.0%, down 60 basis points from the end of 2012 on 179,000 SF of net absorption and no new supply. The second quarter saw community-neighborhood center rents rise up 0.8%, to $14.51 psf asking, an unusually large quarterly increase. Rents had increased just 1.0% asking during all of 2012. Reis, however, expects the vacancy rate to fall to 11.7% by the end of 2013, with rent gains coming in at 1.5% asking for the year. The power center vacancy rate is 6.2% for the second quarter of 2013, down 80 basis points from the prior quarter and 180 from a year earlier, so the big- box segment is starting to get tight.1 Sources: 1-Reis; 2-Real Capital Analytics
  • 17. Top Markets: Retail Metro RANKS Q3 2013 % Change Vac Vac % Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rank Asking %Change Rent Rent $ Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rate Rank Final Rank Hartford, CT 10.4 -6.73% 8 $17.24 2.44% 2 Orlando, FL 14.0 -9.29% 2 $17.34 1.85% 10 7.2 -8.33% 3 $20.18 1.73% 16 Minneapolis, MN 11.5 -5.22% 15 $17.53 2.00% 7 Fort Worth, TX 13.1 -6.87% 5 $14.30 1.54% 19 Austin, TX Fairfield County, CT 4.0 -5.00% 19 $27.81 2.05% 6 Memphis, TN 13.1 -7.63% 4 $13.41 1.34% 24 Dallas, TX 14.2 -5.63% 14 $16.47 1.76% 14 5.9 -10.17% 1 $27.86 1.01% 34 Houston, TX 12.5 -3.20% 32 $16.04 2.18% 4 Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA 10.4 -4.81% 20 $14.91 1.54% 18 9.5 -3.16% 33 $17.57 2.16% 5 Louisville, KY 10.5 -6.67% 9 $15.67 1.08% 31 Fort Lauderdale, FL 10.9 -2.75% 39 $18.78 1.86% 9 Phoenix, AZ 11.6 -5.17% 17 $18.62 1.02% 33 Orange County, CA 5.8 -3.45% 29 $30.70 1.43% 22 Boston, MA 6.9 -4.35% 24 $21.83 1.19% 29 Northern New Jersey, NJ Raleigh-Durham, NC San Diego, CA 6.4 -3.13% 34 $28.38 1.41% 23 11.9 -1.68% 49 $14.89 1.81% 11 Baltimore, MD 7.4 -6.76% 7 $21.42 0.61% 54 San Jose, CA 5.9 -1.69% 48 $30.82 1.75% 15 New Orleans, LA Portland, OR 8.7 -5.75% 13 $20.15 0.65% 51 Las Vegas, NV 13.0 -3.85% 26 $20.93 0.91% 38 New Haven, CT 12.5 0.00% 63 $16.13 2.54% 1 Charleston, SC 11.6 -6.03% 10 $13.44 0.60% 55 Knoxville, TN 11.1 -4.50% 22 $13.96 0.79% 43 Cincinnati, OH 13.9 -4.32% 25 $14.69 0.88% 40 Salt Lake City, UT 13.3 -6.77% 6 $16.06 0.44% 60 Seattle, WA 7.0 -2.86% 38 $22.96 1.26% 28 Pittsburgh, PA 8.0 0.00% 63 $16.14 2.42% 3 Richmond, VA 9.7 -3.09% 35 $15.94 0.94% 35 Palm Beach, FL 12.2 -0.82% 62 $21.35 1.97% 8 Columbus, OH 16.0 -1.88% 45 $12.65 1.11% 30 Long Island, NY 5.3 0.00% 63 $25.53 1.80% 12 Suburban Virginia, VA 6.9 -5.80% 12 $27.81 0.32% 65 Los Angeles, CA 6.1 -1.64% 51 $29.13 1.27% 27 Rochester, NY 13.0 -3.85% 26 $12.91 0.62% 53 Birmingham, AL 15.3 -1.31% 54 $14.57 1.30% 25 Central New Jersey, NJ 10.2 -0.98% 58 $22.25 1.48% 21 9.1 -3.30% 31 $13.66 0.73% 49 Omaha, NE Source: Reis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 9 10 11 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 22 25 25 25 28 28 28 31 31 33 33 35 36 37 37 37 40
  • 18. Top Markets: Retail Cont. Metro RANKS Q3 2013 % Change Vac % Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Vac Rank Asking Rent $ %Change Rent Rate Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rank Final Rank 7.2 -1.39% 53 $24.27 0.82% 42 Little Rock, AR 12.1 4.96% 78 $12.49 1.68% 17 Tulsa, OK Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC Indianapolis, IN 17.0 -3.53% 28 $11.19 0.27% 68 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 11.7 -0.85% 59 $14.06 0.92% 37 58 15.2 -1.97% 43 $14.58 0.48% 59 St. Louis, MO 12.9 -2.33% 40 $14.71 0.34% 63 3.9 0.00% 63 $32.86 0.85% 41 Milwaukee, WI 12.8 0.78% 71 $15.06 0.93% 36 San Bernardino/Riverside, CA 10.2 -1.96% 44 $20.57 0.29% 67 Detroit, MI 12.0 -1.67% 50 $16.92 0.35% 62 Colorado Springs, CO 15.5 0.65% 69 $13.89 0.79% 43 Greenville, SC 14.0 -1.43% 52 $11.79 0.34% 63 San Antonio, TX 11.5 -1.74% 47 $14.90 0.20% 70 Sacramento, CA 12.4 0.81% 72 $21.81 0.78% 45 Wichita, KS 13.3 -2.26% 41 $12.08 -0.41% 78 Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 11.8 0.00% 63 $14.24 0.56% 57 6.2 1.61% 76 $27.93 0.75% 48 16.5 -1.82% 46 $10.65 -0.47% 80 9.6 -1.04% 57 $19.83 0.25% 69 Tacoma, WA 11.9 -0.84% 61 $18.60 0.32% 65 Chattanooga, TN 14.2 7.75% 80 $12.35 0.57% 56 Lexington, KY 8.1 6.17% 79 $13.93 0.43% 60 Columbia, SC 11.4 0.00% 63 $12.33 -0.41% 77 Buffalo, NY 13.8 0.72% 70 $12.05 -0.25% 76 Jacksonville, FL 12.8 1.56% 75 $15.26 0.13% 71 Cleveland, OH 14.7 3.40% 77 $14.95 -0.07% 74 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 Ventura County, CA 9.1 -4.40% 23 $28.62 0.49% 58 Chicago, IL 11.6 -3.45% 29 $19.07 0.63% 52 Charlotte, NC 10.3 -2.91% 37 $17.93 0.78% 45 Kansas City, MO 12.0 -5.83% 11 $14.09 0.07% 72 Denver, CO 11.8 -0.85% 60 $16.88 1.30% 25 Tucson, AZ 9.9 -3.03% 36 $16.76 0.66% 50 Westchester, NY 8.0 -1.25% 55 $35.76 1.03% 32 Oklahoma City, OK 13.7 1.46% 74 $11.35 1.76% 13 Atlanta, GA 14.2 -2.11% 42 $17.21 0.76% 47 Syracuse, NY 15.5 -5.16% 18 $12.55 -0.16% 75 Albuquerque, NM 11.3 0.88% 73 $14.41 1.53% 20 Nashville, TN 8.7 -4.60% 21 $15.39 0.06% 73 Suburban Maryland, MD 9.0 -1.11% 56 $25.18 0.91% 38 13.5 -5.19% 16 $21.00 -0.43% 79 Providence, RI Miami, FL San Francisco, CA Oakland-East Bay, CA Dayton, OH Philadelphia, PA Source: Reis
  • 20. Top Commercial RE Markets Multi-Family 28 Orange County, CA 56 Little Rock, AR 28 Seattle, WA 56 Memphis, TN 29 Charlotte, NC 58 Suburban Maryland, MD 30 Cleveland, OH 59 Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC Houston, TX 30 Columbia, SC 59 Los Angeles, CA 5 Cincinnati, OH 30 Rochester, NY 61 St. Louis, MO 6 Columbus, OH 33 San Francisco, CA 62 Suburban Virginia, VA 7 Omaha, NE 35 Fort Worth, TX 63 Philadelphia, PA 8 Syracuse, NY 36 Hartford, CT 64 Northern New Jersey, NJ 8 Tacoma, WA 36 Wichita, KS 65 Pittsburgh, PA 10 Orlando, FL 38 Miami, FL 66 Fort Lauderdale, FL 38 Sacramento, CA 67 Birmingham, AL 40 Austin, TX 68 Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA 11 Baltimore, MD 40 Tulsa, OK 69 Indianapolis, IN 11 Jacksonville, FL 70 Westchester, NY 11 Portland, OR 14 San Antonio, TX 15 Phoenix, AZ 16 Minneapolis, MN 17 Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 18 Dallas, TX 19 Detroit, MI 20 Atlanta, GA 21 Buffalo, NY 22 Charleston, SC 22 Raleigh-Durham, NC 24 Denver, CO 25 Colorado Springs, CO 25 Las Vegas, NV 25 Nashville, TN 1 Oakland-East Bay, CA 2 Greenville, SC 3 San Diego, CA 4 42 Boston, MA 42 Kansas City, MO 71 Milwaukee, WI 42 San Jose, CA 72 Louisville, KY 45 Palm Beach, FL 73 New Orleans, LA 46 Knoxville, TN 74 Central New Jersey, NJ 47 San Bernardino/Riverside, CA 75 Fairfield County, CT 48 Richmond, VA 76 Lexington, KY 48 Tucson, AZ 77 District of Columbia, DC 50 Chicago, IL 78 Chattanooga, TN 51 Oklahoma City, OK 79 New York, NY 52 Providence, RI 80 Long Island, NY 53 New Haven, CT 81 Albuquerque, NM 54 Salt Lake City, UT 82 Dayton, OH 54 Ventura County, CA
  • 21. Top 5 Ranked Multi-Family Markets Oakland-East Bay, CA Vacancy is rock bottom and falling in the 146,345-unit Oakland- East Bay apartment. The second quarter vacancy rate was 2.8%, down 10 basis points from the prior quarter. The Class A vacancy rate was tight at 3.3% but up 10 basis points for the second quarter, while the Class B/C segment was tighter at 2.5%, down 20 basis points. More than two-thirds of the inventory is Class B/C, and the Class B/C inventory fell 101 units in the second quarter due to conversion. Net absorption and new supply year-to-date through that month were 609 units and zero. Reis reports 2,066 units under construction. Rent gains are slowing despite slow vacancy. During the second quarter of 2013 the average asking rent rose 0.7% to $1,450 per month. 1 Greenville, SC Vacancy is low and rent gains are accelerating in the 34,530-unit Greenville area apartment market. The third quarter vacancy rate is 4.5%, unchanged from the second quarter but down 40 basis points from the fourth quarter of 2012. Vacancy held steady despite the completion of three projects with 850 units during the third quarter: the 346-unit The Aventine at Greenville, the 260-unit Springs at Greenville, and the 244-unit The Vinings at Icar Apartments, all located in the South Greenfield submarket. Prior to that surge of new supply, the second quarter vacancy rate for Class A space was 4.7%, down from 5.6% a year earlier. Class B/C vacancy was 4.2%, down 120 basis points. New supply is forecast to slow after the banner year of 2013, with an average of just 314 new units per year from 2014 to 2017, but net absorption is forecast to slow as well. New units pushed up the average asking rent, which increased 1.7% during the third quarter to $696 per month. That was a gain of 2.7% for the first three quarters of 2013 combined. 1 San Diego, CA The 181,326-unit market-rate, investment-grade San Diego apartment market continues to experience extremely low vacancy and solid quarterly rental growth. San Diego’s third quarter 2013 vacancy rate was 2.3%, according to Reis, down 20 basis points from the prior quarter and down 70 from 12 months earlier. Vacancy averaged 3.8% from 2008 to 2012, so this market is extremely tight. Vacancy rates at or below 5.0% are generally considered to indicate a full market. San Diego has one of the highest occupancy rates in the country, at 97.7%. San Diego has the fifth highest concentration of people between the ages of 25 to 35 (largest renter age cohort) in the country, over 484,000 total. Today, nearly half of the households in San Diego county are renting. The third quarter saw 283 units of net absorption, Reis reports, a healthy figure which brings the year-to-date total to 1,238. The net absorption total for 2012 was 1,584 units, so 2013 is shaping up as a strong year for demand. Third quarter rent gains were substantial once again, and year over-year gains were also strong, according to Reis. The average asking rent increased 0.7% to $1,430 per month. The year-over-year gains are 2.7%.1 $1.3 billion in sales 86 Transactions2 Houston, TX An avalanche of new supply is descending on the Houston apartment sector as the market, free of impediments due to the recession and riding on the back of robust economic and demographic trends, moves into a defining phase of its new cycle. Indeed, more than 4,300 market-rate apartments completed construction metrowide year-to-date as of mid-August even as some 15,500 others remained under construction, a large portion of which will arrive on line by the end of the year in a rapidly accelerating succession of deliveries. Demand, a driving factor, remains strong. While robust development and leasing activities are indicated for much of the metro area, the Energy Corridor on the west side (and west side submarkets generally), home to much of Houston’s oil and gas business, will see the highest activity levels. The vacancy rate reached its cyclical peak at 12.9% during the first quarter of 2010. At that point, a robust recovery commenced. It led, before long, to the heated expansion cycle now underway. Vacancy tells the tale: by the end of the latest quarter the rate had descended to 6.6%, a decline of 20 basis points for the period, a loss of 110 year-over-year. Moderately positive in 2010, a little slower in 2011, rent growth soared in 2012 with gains of 4.7% indicated for the asking averages. 1 $3.5 billion in sales 170 Transactions2 Cincinnati, OH The Vacancy in the 106,296-unit Cincinnati apartment market posted another drop in the second quarter, falling 30 basis points to 3.5%. That rate is down 120 basis points from 12 months earlier. Class A vacancy finished the quarter at 3.3%, down 40 basis points over the quarter, while Class B/C vacancy was 3.6%, down 30 basis points from the prior quarter. Cincinnati is still a very tight multifamily market, with net absorption running ahead of demand. From 2008 to 2012, about 2,500 units were completed, but net absorption was over 5,000 during that time span. Reis’s latest construction data lists 592 units completing in five projects so far in 2013, with net absorption at 994 units. Vacancy is forecast to finish 2013 at 3.4%. Reis reports second quarter average asking rents of $754 per month, up 0.5% for the quarter, and up 2.2% over 12 months.1 $156 million in sales 13 Transactions2 Sources: 1-Reis; 2-Real Capital Analytics
  • 22. Top Markets: Multi-Family Metro RANKS Q3 2013 % Change Vac Vac % Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rank Asking Rent $ Oakland-East Bay, CA 2.6 -18.75% 10 Greenville, SC 4.5 -18.18% San Diego, CA 2.3 -23.33% Houston, TX 6.4 Cincinnati, OH %Change Rent Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rate Rank Final Rank $1,478 4.30% 5 12 $696 3.42% 12 3 $1,430 2.73% 27 -15.79% 26 $866 4.21% 6 3.5 -23.91% 2 $760 2.56% 33 Columbus, OH 4.6 -19.30% 8 $740 2.64% 29 Omaha, NE 3.1 -16.22% 24 $751 3.16% 17 Tacoma, WA 4.1 -21.15% 4 $812 2.40% 39 Syracuse, NY 2.1 -25.00% 1 $741 2.35% 42 Orlando, FL 5.1 -15.00% 33 $925 3.24% 14 Portland, OR 3.0 -11.76% 41 $916 3.85% 9 Baltimore, MD 3.6 -12.20% 37 $1,095 3.30% 13 Jacksonville, FL 6.8 -17.07% 18 $837 2.57% 32 San Antonio, TX 5.6 -12.50% 35 $780 3.17% 16 Phoenix, AZ 5.4 -16.92% 19 $796 2.45% 35 Minneapolis, MN 2.2 -12.00% 39 $1,039 3.08% 18 Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 4.5 -18.18% 12 $887 2.31% 46 Dallas, TX 5.0 -12.28% 36 $895 2.87% 23 Detroit, MI 3.8 -17.39% 16 $880 2.33% 44 Atlanta, GA 6.2 -15.07% 32 $894 2.64% 29 Buffalo, NY 2.7 -20.59% 5 $778 2.10% 56 Charleston, SC 4.5 -8.16% 51 $839 3.58% 11 Raleigh-Durham, NC 3.9 -15.22% 31 $874 2.58% 31 Denver, CO 3.7 -7.50% 56 $992 4.20% 7 Nashville, TN 4.3 -6.52% 61 $828 4.68% 3 Colorado Springs, CO 3.8 -15.56% 27 $758 2.43% 37 Las Vegas, NV 5.5 -20.29% 6 $841 2.06% 58 Seattle, WA 4.1 -4.65% 65 $1,180 6.98% 1 Orange County, CA 3.1 -11.43% 42 $1,626 2.85% 24 Charlotte, NC 4.8 -11.11% 44 $868 2.84% 25 Cleveland, OH 3.3 -15.38% 29 $777 2.37% 41 Columbia, SC 6.7 -16.25% 23 $761 2.28% 47 Rochester, NY 3.0 -16.67% 20 $825 2.23% 50 San Francisco, CA 3.1 -3.13% 67 $2,113 4.35% 4 Fort Worth, TX 5.1 -10.53% 45 $776 2.65% 28 Wichita, KS 4.4 -8.33% 50 $554 2.78% 26 Hartford, CT 2.8 -17.65% 14 $1,042 1.96% 62 Miami, FL 3.9 -4.88% 63 $1,157 3.21% 15 Sacramento, CA 3.4 -19.05% 9 $972 1.89% 69 Austin, TX 4.4 0.00% 71 $972 3.96% 8 Tulsa, OK 5.9 -13.24% 34 $618 2.32% 45 Source: Reis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 10 11 11 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 24 25 25 25 28 28 29 30 30 30 33 35 36 36 38 38 40 40
  • 23. Top Markets: Multi-Family Cont. Metro RANKS Q3 2013 % Change Vac Vac % Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rank Asking Rent $ %Change Rent Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Rate Rank Final Rank San Jose, CA 2.9 7.41% 79 $1,743 4.94% 2 Boston, MA 3.8 0.00% 71 $1,879 3.70% 10 Kansas City, MO 4.2 -17.65% 14 $749 1.90% 67 Palm Beach, FL 5.4 -5.26% 62 $1,192 2.94% 21 Knoxville, TN 4.8 -20.00% 7 $626 1.46% 78 San Bernardino/Riverside, CA 3.5 -18.60% 11 $1,092 1.58% 76 Richmond, VA 4.7 -7.84% 53 $839 2.44% 36 Tucson, AZ 5.2 -16.13% 25 $689 1.92% 64 Chicago, IL 3.7 -7.50% 56 $1,139 2.52% 34 Oklahoma City, OK 5.5 -11.29% 43 $594 2.24% 48 Providence, RI 3.0 -16.67% 20 $1,270 1.76% 72 New Haven, CT 2.0 -16.67% 22 $1,169 1.83% 71 Salt Lake City, UT 4.0 2.56% 76 $803 2.95% 20 Ventura County, CA 2.9 -17.14% 17 $1,466 1.24% 79 Little Rock, AR 6.6 6.45% 78 $701 2.94% 21 Memphis, TN 8.2 -11.83% 40 $722 1.98% 59 Suburban Maryland, MD 3.9 -4.88% 63 $1,392 2.43% 37 Los Angeles, CA 3.2 -8.57% 49 $1,480 2.14% 54 Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC 6.0 -15.49% 28 $695 1.61% 75 St. Louis, MO 5.0 -15.25% 30 $769 1.72% 74 Suburban Virginia, VA 3.4 -10.53% 46 $1,597 1.98% 59 Philadelphia, PA 3.6 -7.69% 54 $1,108 2.21% 52 Northern New Jersey, NJ 3.5 -10.26% 47 $1,605 1.97% 61 Pittsburgh, PA 3.0 0.00% 71 $896 2.40% 39 Fort Lauderdale, FL 4.2 -2.33% 69 $1,179 2.34% 43 Birmingham, AL 5.6 -6.67% 60 $762 2.14% 54 Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA 4.1 -6.82% 58 $931 2.08% 57 Indianapolis, IN 5.8 -1.69% 70 $729 2.24% 48 Westchester, NY 3.1 0.00% 71 $1,968 2.23% 50 Milwaukee, WI 3.5 -7.89% 52 $887 1.84% 70 Louisville, KY 4.4 0.00% 71 $699 2.19% 53 New Orleans, LA 6.2 -10.14% 48 $906 1.57% 77 Central New Jersey, NJ 2.7 -3.57% 66 $1,227 1.91% 66 Fairfield County, CT 4.9 -7.55% 55 $1,897 0.48% 83 Lexington, KY 5.5 -6.78% 59 $685 0.59% 82 District of Columbia, DC 4.8 11.63% 81 $1,539 1.92% 64 Chattanooga, TN 4.7 20.51% 83 $680 1.95% 63 New York, NY 2.4 9.09% 80 $3,105 1.90% 67 Long Island, NY 3.3 -2.94% 68 $1,648 0.86% 81 Albuquerque, NM 4.3 13.16% 82 $752 1.76% 72 Dayton, OH 5.5 3.77% 77 $660 1.23% 80 Source: Reis 42 42 42 45 46 47 48 48 50 51 52 53 54 54 56 56 58 59 59 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
  • 25. Top Commercial RE Markets Population 55 Birmingham, AL Oklahoma City, OK 56 San Jose, CA 30 Omaha, NE 57 Cincinnati, OH Raleigh-Durham, NC 31 Fort Lauderdale, FL 58 Wichita, KS 5 Fort Worth, TX 32 Knoxville, TN 59 New York, NY 6 Orlando, FL 33 Sacramento, CA 60 Baltimore, MD 7 Dallas, TX 34 Jacksonville, FL 61 New Orleans, LA 8 San Antonio, TX 34 Minneapolis, MN 62 Boston, MA 9 Houston, TX 36 Little Rock, AR 63 Northern New Jersey, NJ 10 Las Vegas, NV 36 San Francisco, CA 63 Westchester, NY 38 Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC 65 Miami, FL 39 Kansas City, MO 66 Albuquerque, NM 1 Phoenix, AZ 2 Austin, TX 3 Charlotte, NC 4 27 Greenville, SC 27 Tucson, AZ 29 11 Denver, CO 39 Richmond, VA 67 Chicago, IL 11 Suburban Virginia, VA 39 Tulsa, OK 68 Milwaukee, WI 13 Portland, OR 69 Providence, RI 14 Salt Lake City, UT 42 Memphis, TN 70 New Haven, CT 15 Columbia, SC 43 Louisville, KY 15 District of Columbia, DC 44 Orange County, CA 71 Philadelphia, PA 17 Nashville, TN 44 Tacoma, WA 72 St. Louis, MO 18 Colorado Springs, CO 46 Ventura County, CA 73 Fairfield County, CT 19 Atlanta, GA 47 Columbus, OH 74 Hartford, CT 20 Indianapolis, IN 48 Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA 75 Long Island, NY 20 Lexington, KY 49 Oakland-East Bay, CA 76 Rochester, NY 22 Charleston, SC 50 Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 77 Dayton, OH 23 Seattle, WA 51 Chattanooga, TN 78 Pittsburgh, PA 24 Palm Beach, FL 52 Los Angeles, CA 79 Syracuse, NY 25 San Diego, CA 53 Suburban Maryland, MD 80 Detroit, MI 54 Central New Jersey, NJ 81 Buffalo, NY 82 Cleveland, OH 26 San Bernardino/Riverside, CA
  • 26. Top Markets: Population Metro RANKS Population %Change Pop Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Phoenix, AZ Austin, TX 4,473,340 2.89% 1,894,800 2.62% Charlotte, NC 1,880,810 2.22% Raleigh-Durham, NC 1,761,700 2.20% Fort Worth, TX 2,270,580 2.05% Orlando, FL 2,280,330 2.02% Dallas, TX 4,542,610 2.00% San Antonio, TX 2,289,320 1.97% Houston, TX 6,355,060 1.94% Las Vegas, NV 2,046,290 1.82% Denver, CO 2,701,560 1.70% Suburban Virginia, VA 2,805,390 1.70% Portland, OR 2,338,200 1.69% Salt Lake City, UT 1,758,110 1.58% 798,950 1.44% Columbia, SC District of Columbia, DC 644,160 1.44% 1,673,980 1.41% 680,400 1.40% Atlanta, GA 5,526,270 1.32% Indianapolis, IN Nashville, TN Colorado Springs, CO 1,828,110 1.29% Lexington, KY 492,850 1.29% Charleston, SC 708,380 1.24% Seattle, WA 2,780,350 1.15% Palm Beach, FL 1,375,680 1.14% San Diego, CA 3,221,530 1.13% San Bernardino/Riverside, CA 4,408,930 1.10% Greenville, SC 1,146,870 1.07% Tucson, AZ 1,004,340 1.07% Oklahoma City, OK 1,313,870 1.05% 898,110 1.04% 1,838,010 1.02% Omaha, NE Fort Lauderdale, FL Knoxville, TN 718,830 1.01% Sacramento, CA 2,223,920 1.00% Jacksonville, FL 1,395,180 0.99% Minneapolis, MN 3,396,360 0.99% Little Rock, AR 725,930 0.97% San Francisco, CA 1,843,610 0.97% Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC 1,389,020 0.92% Kansas City, MO 2,088,200 0.91% Richmond, VA 1,297,180 0.91% 962,970 0.91% Tulsa, OK Source: Reis Pop Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 13 14 15 15 17 18 19 20 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 27 29 30 31 32 33 34 34 36 36 38 39 39 39
  • 27. Top Markets: Population Cont. Metro RANKS Population %Change Pop Q3 ‘12-Q3 ‘13 Memphis, TN 1,348,110 0.90% Louisville, KY 1,315,660 0.89% Orange County, CA 3,124,020 0.86% 820,500 0.86% Tacoma, WA Ventura County, CA 844,390 0.80% Columbus, OH 1,896,520 0.77% Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA 1,711,190 0.74% Oakland-East Bay, CA 2,658,120 0.71% Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 2,863,690 0.69% Chattanooga, TN 542,420 0.68% Los Angeles, CA 10,046,350 0.65% Suburban Maryland, MD 2,383,700 0.64% Central New Jersey, NJ 2,748,890 0.59% Birmingham, AL 1,144,220 0.57% San Jose, CA 1,907,940 0.56% Cincinnati, OH 2,157,750 0.53% Wichita, KS 632,180 0.51% New York, NY 8,805,330 0.50% Baltimore, MD 2,769,160 0.46% New Orleans, LA 1,211,730 0.42% Boston, MA 4,240,990 0.40% Northern New Jersey, NJ 4,253,690 0.39% 965,870 0.39% 2,600,790 0.38% Westchester, NY Miami, FL Albuquerque, NM 905,070 0.35% Chicago, IL 7,976,020 0.32% Milwaukee, WI 1,571,790 0.24% Providence, RI 1,605,750 0.23% New Haven, CT 864,530 0.20% Philadelphia, PA 5,317,990 0.19% St. Louis, MO 2,851,930 0.17% 935,700 0.12% Hartford, CT 1,215,140 0.10% Long Island, NY 2,850,180 0.06% Rochester, NY 1,056,940 0.01% 979,970 0.00% 2,358,780 -0.02% 660,430 -0.05% Detroit, MI 4,439,210 -0.07% Buffalo, NY 1,130,910 -0.23% Cleveland, OH 2,054,050 -0.36% Fairfield County, CT Dayton, OH Pittsburgh, PA Syracuse, NY Source: Reis Pop Rank 42 43 44 44 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 63 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
  • 29. Top Commercial RE Markets Unemployment 53 Richmond, VA Colorado Springs, CO 56 Tulsa, OK 30 Syracuse, NY 57 Baltimore, MD San Jose, CA 31 Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA 58 New Haven, CT 5 Oakland-East Bay, CA 32 Austin, TX 59 Fairfield County, CT 5 San Francisco, CA 33 Dallas, TX 60 District of Columbia, DC 7 Salt Lake City, UT 33 Fort Worth, TX 60 Pittsburgh, PA 8 Palm Beach, FL 35 Houston, TX 60 Suburban Maryland, MD 9 San Diego, CA 36 Indianapolis, IN 60 Suburban Virginia, VA 10 Sacramento, CA 36 Los Angeles, CA 64 St. Louis, MO 38 Long Island, NY 65 Omaha, NE 38 New York, NY 66 Cincinnati, OH 11 Fort Lauderdale, FL 38 Northern New Jersey, NJ 67 Nashville, TN 11 Miami, FL 38 Westchester, NY 67 Wichita, KS 13 Seattle, WA 69 Cleveland, OH 13 Tacoma, WA 15 Orange County, CA 15 San Bernardino/Riverside, CA 17 Ventura County, CA 18 Denver, CO 19 Minneapolis, MN 20 Las Vegas, NV 21 Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC 22 Charlotte, NC 23 Central New Jersey, NJ 24 Portland, OR 25 Raleigh-Durham, NC 1 Orlando, FL 2 Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 3 Jacksonville, FL 4 27 Buffalo, NY 28 Birmingham, AL 29 Rochester, NY Detroit, MI 43 Louisville, KY 70 Phoenix, AZ 44 Columbia, SC 71 Oklahoma City, OK 45 Albuquerque, NM 72 Dayton, OH 45 Charleston, SC 73 Columbus, OH 47 Atlanta, GA 73 Knoxville, TN 48 Milwaukee, WI 73 Little Rock, AR 49 San Antonio, TX 73 Tucson, AZ 50 Greenville, SC 77 Boston, MA 51 Lexington, KY 78 Chicago, IL 52 Hartford, CT 79 Chattanooga, TN 53 Philadelphia, PA 80 Memphis, TN 53 26 42 Providence, RI 81 Kansas City, MO 81 New Orleans, LA
  • 30. Top Markets: Unemployment Metro RANKS MSA Aug 12 Aug 13 Change Unemp Unemp Unemp in Unemp Rank Orlando, FL Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 8.6 6.6 -23.26% Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 9.1 7 -23.08% Jacksonville, FL Jacksonville, FL 8.6 6.7 -22.09% San Jose, CA San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 8.7 6.8 -21.84% Oakland-East Bay, CA San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 8.3 6.5 -21.69% San Francisco, CA San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 8.3 6.5 -21.69% Salt Lake City, UT Salt Lake City, UT 5.7 4.5 -21.05% San Diego, CA San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 9.2 7.4 -19.57% Sacramento, CA Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 10.4 8.5 -18.27% Fort Lauderdale, FL Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 8.9 7.3 -17.98% Miami, FL Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 8.9 7.3 -17.98% Palm Beach, FL Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 8.9 7.3 -17.98% Seattle, WA Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 7.4 6.1 -17.57% Tacoma, WA Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 7.4 6.1 -17.57% Orange County, CA Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 12.6 10.4 -17.46% San Bernardino/Riverside, CA Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 12.6 10.4 -17.46% Ventura County, CA Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 12.6 10.4 -17.46% Denver, CO Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO 7.8 6.5 -16.67% Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 5.6 4.7 -16.07% Las Vegas, NV Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 11.4 9.6 -15.79% Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC Greensboro-High Point, NC 10.2 8.6 -15.69% Charlotte, NC Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC 9.8 8.3 -15.31% Central New Jersey, NJ Trenton-Ewing, NJ 8.1 6.9 -14.81% Portland, OR Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 8.3 7.1 -14.46% Raleigh-Durham, NC Raleigh-Cary, NC 7.9 6.8 -13.92% Rochester, NY Rochester, NY 8 6.9 -13.75% Buffalo, NY Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 8.4 7.3 -13.10% Birmingham, AL Birmingham-Hoover, AL 6.9 6 -13.04% Colorado Springs, CO Colorado Springs, CO 9.1 8 -12.09% Syracuse, NY Syracuse, NY 8.3 7.3 -12.05% Norfolk/Hampton Roads, VA Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 6.7 5.9 -11.94% Austin, TX Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX 5.9 5.2 -11.86% Dallas, TX Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 6.8 6 -11.76% Fort Worth, TX Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 6.8 6 -11.76% Houston, TX Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 6.9 6.1 -11.59% Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 7.8 6.9 -11.54% Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 10.4 9.2 -11.54% Long Island, NY New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 8.9 7.9 -11.24% New York, NY New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 8.9 7.9 -11.24% Northern New Jersey, NJ New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 8.9 7.9 -11.24% Westchester, NY New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 8.9 7.9 -11.24% Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics 1 2 3 4 5 5 7 8 9 10 10 10 13 13 15 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 33 35 36 36 38 38 38 38
  • 31. Top Markets: Unemployment Cont. Metro RANKS MSA Aug 12 Unemp Aug 13 Change in Unemp Unemp Unemp Rank 9.8 -10.91% 42 7.4 -10.84% 43 7.5 -10.71% 44 6.9 -10.39% 45 6.9 -10.39% 45 8 -10.11% 47 6.9 -9.21% 48 6 -9.09% 49 7.1 -8.97% 50 6.2 -8.82% 51 8.3 -7.78% 52 8.4 -7.69% 53 9.6 -7.69% 53 6 -7.69% 53 5.2 -7.14% 56 7.1 -6.58% 57 8.6 -6.52% 58 Detroit, MI Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 11 Louisville, KY Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 8.3 Columbia, SC Columbia, SC 8.4 Albuquerque, NM Albuquerque, NM 7.7 Charleston, SC Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC 7.7 Atlanta, GA Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 8.9 Milwaukee, WI Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 7.6 San Antonio, TX San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 6.6 Greenville, SC Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 7.8 Lexington, KY Lexington-Fayette, KY 6.8 Hartford, CT Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Philadelphia, PA Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Providence, RI Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA Metropolitan Richmond, VA Richmond, VA 6.5 Tulsa, OK Tulsa, OK 5.6 Baltimore, MD Baltimore-Towson, MD 7.6 New Haven, CT New Haven, CT Metropolitan NECTA 9.2 Fairfield County, CT Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Metropolitan 8.1 7.6 -6.17% 59 District of Columbia, DC Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 5.7 5.4 -5.26% Pittsburgh, PA Pittsburgh, PA 7.6 7.2 -5.26% Suburban Maryland, MD Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 5.7 5.4 -5.26% Suburban Virginia, VA Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 5.7 5.4 -5.26% St. Louis, MO St. Louis, MO-IL 1 7.8 7.4 -5.13% Omaha, NE Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 4.4 4.2 -4.55% Cincinnati, OH Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 6.9 6.7 -2.90% Nashville, TN Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 7 6.8 -2.86% Wichita, KS Wichita, KS 7 6.8 -2.86% Cleveland, OH Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 7.2 7 -2.78% Phoenix, AZ Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ 7.6 7.4 -2.63% Oklahoma City, OK Oklahoma City, OK 4.8 4.7 -2.08% Dayton, OH Dayton, OH 7.4 7.3 -1.35% Columbus, OH Columbus, OH 6 6 0.00% Knoxville, TN Knoxville, TN 7.1 7.1 0.00% Little Rock, AR Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 6.5 6.5 0.00% Tucson, AZ Tucson, AZ 7.7 7.7 0.00% Boston, MA Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH Metropolitan 6.1 6.2 1.64% Chicago, IL Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI 8.9 9.1 2.25% Chattanooga, TN Chattanooga, TN-GA 7.8 8 2.56% Memphis, TN Memphis, TN-MS-AR 9.1 9.4 3.30% Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO-KS 6.9 7.2 4.35% New Orleans, LA New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 6.9 7.2 4.35% 60 60 60 60 64 65 66 67 67 69 70 71 72 73 73 73 73 77 78 79 80 81 81 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics 9 9.1 10.4
  • 32. Blue Book Market Intelligence Report Market Snapshots Quarterly quick market updates Additional Market Research Tools CBCWorldwide.com 800-222-2162 © 2014 Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC, dba Coldwell Banker Commercial Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Coldwell Banker Commercial Affiliates fully supports the principles of the Equal Opportunity Act. Each Office is Independently Owned and Operated. Coldwell Banker Commercial and the Coldwell Banker Commercial Logo are registered service marks owned by Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC.