השוואת תועלת המחזור מול תועלת ייצור ביומתכלה

  • 373 views
Uploaded on

 

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
373
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Battle of the bags: LCA says PE trumps bioplastics By Matt Defosse Published: August 28th, 2009 A Life Cycle Assessment completed by an independent research center, Germany’s Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (Heidelberg), compared bags made from polyethylene (PE), from PE containing some or 100% post-consumer recyclate (PCR), and from bioplastics, and concluded that bags from PCR-PE beat the others with regard to environmental friendliness and sustainability, with bioplastics also scoring below bags made from virgin PE. The LCA was completed early this summer but its results were first released this week by the German Association for Plastics Packaging and Films (Bad Homburg), which counts about 400 of the country’s packaging processors in its ranks. The LCA was commissioned by five Association member companies, all involved in extrusion, conversion, and/or distribution of plastics trash bags and was done in the knowledge that legislation penalizing bags made from traditional plastics, and favoring bioplastics, is on the table in Germany and in other countries. The five companies are CeDo, Cofresco, Fipp, pely-plastic and Quickpack. All make use of virgin and PCR-PE but none as yet market trash bags made from bioplastics. The LCA included data from France and Germany, with the bioplastic bags studied being ones that already are commercially available in these countries. Bioplastics used in these bags are the Ingeo brand from NatureWorks and BASF’s Ecoflex; BASF recommends its material’s use for bags for bio- trash only (food scraps, grass clippings, and such), not household refuse. One of the key findings of the LCA was that the production of the plastics is the most relevant link in the entire chain with regard to environmental sustainability; the differences were insignificant in the processing and transport of the bags to customers. The PCR-PE bags scored best under the assumption these were of a sufficient thickness and strength comparable to bags from virgin PE. The study also concluded that the eco-performance of bags from bioplastics is bound to improve as larger plants for manufacture of these materials are built, creating economies of scale, and as the body of knowledge of processing of these materials improves. Still, noted the three authors, even in light of such advances, they do not expect bioplastic trash bags to score better than the other two options in the near future. The 68-page English-language PDF version of the LCA can be downloaded here; the German version is also available. Irrespective of the results of this particular LCA, the trade group’s officials said they consider bioplastics still a relatively new material offering good potential, especially in certain applications. —Matt Defosse