EBLIP in the 2.0 world - reflective practice unlocking the door to innovation (Lisa Cotter and Gillian Wood)

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    Gillian and I will be talking about the relevance of Evidence-Based Librarianship in the Web 2.0 / Library 2.0 world.

    1 Favorite, 1 Group & 1 Event

    EBLIP in the 2.0 world - reflective practice unlocking the door to innovation (Lisa Cotter and Gillian Wood) - Presentation Transcript

    1. Lisa Cotter NSCCH & The University of Newcastle Gillian Wood Brian Tutt Library, NSW Health Department NSW Health Libraries Forum, 8-9 November 2007 Focus on the User Environment: Techniques and Technologies explore > experiment > engage > evaluate http://nswhlf2007.blogspot.com EBLIP in the 2.0 world: reflective practice unlocking the door to innovation
    2. Overview
      • Evidence-based library and information practice
      • Web 2.0 / Library 2.0 overview
      • Is EBLIP relevant in the 2.0 world ?
      • MLA Social Networking Software Survey
      • Australian Health Librarians and Web 2.0 – uncovering the evidence
    3. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP) EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey APPRAISE the evidence ACQUIRE the evidence APPLY the evidence ASSESS impact and performance (& report findings) ASK a question
    4. Web 2.0 an attitude more than a technology
      • collaborative in nature
      • interactive
      • dynamic; perpetually “beta”
      • blurred line between creation & consumption of content
        • Personal web pages  blogs
        • Text-based tutorials  streaming media applications
        • Taxonomies  folksonomies
        • Q&A email reference  instant messaging, virtual reference
        • OPAC  personalised interface
      • “ Web 2.0 is a matrix of dialogues, not a collection of monologues” Jack Maness, Webology
      EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    5. Library 2.0 62 views and 7 definitions
      • October 2005 - the term “Library 2.0” coined
      • By January 2006 - 62 views and 7 definitions were collected. These include, Library 2.0 is :
        • not about technology
        • all about technology
        • a new name for ideas librarians have been discussing for quite some time
        • means making your library’s space (virtual and physical) more interactive, collaborative and driven by community needs
        • a more intensive way of sharing all the resources that the library already offers
      • Walt Crawford, Cites and Insights
      EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    6. Library 2.0 user centered change
      • “… seeks to break down barriers: barriers librarians have placed on services, barriers of place and time and barriers inherent in what we do ”
      • Michael Stephens, tametheweb.com
      • “… is where the user is, when the user is there”
      • Stephen Abram, SirsiOneSource
      • “ Any service, physical or virtual, that successfully reaches users, is evaluated frequently, and makes use of customer input is a Library 2.0 service”
      • Michael Casey & Laura Savastinuk, Library Journal
      EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    7. Librarian 2.0 …
      • … plans for their users – proposals based on user needs and wants
      • … embraces Web 2.0 tools – building connections online wherever user are (beyond library website)
      • … controls technolust – technology is put to the test – does it meet users need in a new or improved way?
      • … makes good, yet fast decisions – brings evidence to the table for from scholarly journals and blogosphere
      • … is a trendspotter – reads outside the profession and watches for the impact of technology on users and new thinking on business
      • … gets content – future of libraries guided by how users access, consume and create content
      EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    8. Librarian 2.0 …
      • … listens to staff and users when planning,
      • … tells the stories of successes and failures , learns from both, celebrates those successes,
      • … allows staff time to play and learn, and
      • … never stops dreaming about the best library services.
      • Michael Stephens, NextSpace
      EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    9. EBLIP and Web 2.0 friends or foe? EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey Reflects back on the evidence base. EBLIP Looks beyond standard practice seeking innovation. WEB 2.0 Asks Qs first - a focused Q is the foundation of EBLIP Acts first, and asks (or apologises) later. Subject to technolust Constrained by research literature removed from the “real world” (?)
    10. EBLIP and Web 2.0 best available evidence EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
      • We’re all talking 2.0, but where’s the evidence?
        • What people are doing
        • What makes a difference
        • What’s not working
        • What can’t work
      MLA Social Networking Software Survey EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
      • MLA survey earlier this year – 495 responses
        • http://sns.mlanet.org/blog/
      • Interesting posts about blocked sites
      • Raised various discussion topics, around age, who is doing what etc
      MLA Social Networking Software Survey EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    11. Australian Health Librarians and Web 2.0
      • Want to find out who we are and what we do
      • First survey of its kind in Australia
      • Know that more people are using L2.0 tools
      • Confined by MLA survey terms
      • Results early in the New Year
      EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    12. Australian Health Librarians and Web 2.0
      • Later hearing about some ‘mature’ technology happening in our libraries – we’ve been talking about this for years now
      • Work out where to put our energy, what to fight for
      • YouTube currently the most-blocked site – what if we want to use it to share training videos?
      • Facebook – what’s the point? But I love my igoogle, and think that zoho has real potential
      EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    13. Dilbert
    14. Australian Health Librarians and Web 2.0
      • Personal reflections:
        • Integration of journals with CIAP / more seamless full text integration (eg DOIs, WebCite)
        • Integration of OPACs with mainstream search engines
        • Integration of Amazon etc with OPACs
        • Tic toc project for journal TOCs
      EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
      • EBLIP & Web 2.0 can work together
      • What the MLA Social Networking Software Survey did
      • Please contribute to the Australian Health Librarians and Web 2.0 survey
      Conclusion
    15. Questions ? Lisa Cotter NSCCH & The University of Newcastle [email_address] Gillian Wood Brian Tutt Library, NSW Health Department [email_address]
    16. References
      • Jack Maness , Webology http://www.webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html
      • Walt Crawford , Cites and Insights http://cites.boisestate.edu/civ6i2.pdf
      • Michael Stephens , tametheweb.com http://tametheweb.com/2006/02/library_20_discussion_up_at_si.html
      • Stephen Abram , SirsiOneSource http://www.imakenews.com/sirsi/e_article000505688.cfm
      • Michael Casey & Laura Savastinuk , Library Journal http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6365200.html
      • Michael Stephens , NextSpace http://www.oclc.org/nextspace/002/3.htm

    + NSWHLF2007NSWHLF2007, 3 years ago

    custom

    1036 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    DOWNLOAD FILE FOR SPEAKER NOTES
    Two of the recent more

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1036
      • 1036 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 35
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories