Lisa Cotter NSCCH & The University of Newcastle Gillian Wood Brian Tutt Library, NSW Health Department NSW Health Librarie...
Overview <ul><li>Evidence-based library and information practice </li></ul><ul><li>Web 2.0 / Library 2.0 overview </li></u...
Evidence Based Library and  Information Practice (EBLIP) EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey AP...
Web 2.0  an attitude more than a technology <ul><li>collaborative in nature </li></ul><ul><li>interactive </li></ul><ul><l...
Library 2.0  62 views and 7 definitions <ul><li>October 2005  - the term “Library 2.0” coined </li></ul><ul><li>By  Januar...
Library 2.0  user centered change <ul><li>“…  seeks to break down barriers:  barriers librarians have placed on services, ...
Librarian 2.0 … <ul><li>…  plans for their users  – proposals based on  user  needs and wants </li></ul><ul><li>…  embrace...
Librarian 2.0 … <ul><li>…  listens  to staff and users when planning,  </li></ul><ul><li>…  tells the stories of  successe...
EBLIP and Web 2.0  friends or foe? EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey Reflects back on the evi...
EBLIP and Web 2.0  best available evidence EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
<ul><li>We’re all talking 2.0, but where’s the evidence? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>What people are doing </li></ul></ul><ul><u...
<ul><li>MLA survey earlier this year – 495 responses </li></ul><ul><ul><li>http://sns.mlanet.org/blog/   </li></ul></ul><u...
Australian Health Librarians  and Web 2.0 <ul><li>Want to find out who we are and what we do </li></ul><ul><li>First surve...
Australian Health Librarians  and Web 2.0 <ul><li>Later hearing about some ‘mature’ technology happening in our libraries ...
Dilbert
Australian Health Librarians  and Web 2.0 <ul><li>Personal reflections: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Integration of journals with...
<ul><li>EBLIP & Web 2.0  can work together </li></ul><ul><li>What the MLA Social Networking Software Survey did </li></ul>...
Questions ? Lisa Cotter NSCCH & The University of Newcastle [email_address]   Gillian Wood Brian Tutt Library, NSW Health ...
References <ul><li>Jack Maness , Webology  http://www.webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html </li></ul><ul><li>Walt Crawford , Cit...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

EBLIP in the 2.0 world - reflective practice unlocking the door to innovation (Lisa Cotter and Gillian Wood)

2,739 views

Published on

DOWNLOAD FILE FOR SPEAKER NOTES
Two of the recent major challenges to traditional library practice have been evidence-based library and information practice (EBLIP) and Library 2.0, yet these concepts may be put at opposite ends of the innovation scale. EBLIP is concerned with using the best available evidence, and wherever possible – research evidence, to make informed decisions to achieve best practice. Library 2.0 on the other hand, challenges us to look beyond standard practice, “play”, and give new things a go (including the technological opportunities Web 2.0 has presented us). Is there a place for EBLIP in the brave new 2.0 world?

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,739
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
29
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
49
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Gillian and I will be talking about the relevance of Evidence-Based Librarianship in the Web 2.0 / Library 2.0 world.
  • EBLIP in the 2.0 world - reflective practice unlocking the door to innovation (Lisa Cotter and Gillian Wood)

    1. 1. Lisa Cotter NSCCH & The University of Newcastle Gillian Wood Brian Tutt Library, NSW Health Department NSW Health Libraries Forum, 8-9 November 2007 Focus on the User Environment: Techniques and Technologies explore > experiment > engage > evaluate http://nswhlf2007.blogspot.com EBLIP in the 2.0 world: reflective practice unlocking the door to innovation
    2. 2. Overview <ul><li>Evidence-based library and information practice </li></ul><ul><li>Web 2.0 / Library 2.0 overview </li></ul><ul><li>Is EBLIP relevant in the 2.0 world ? </li></ul><ul><li>MLA Social Networking Software Survey </li></ul><ul><li>Australian Health Librarians and Web 2.0 – uncovering the evidence </li></ul>
    3. 3. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP) EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey APPRAISE the evidence ACQUIRE the evidence APPLY the evidence ASSESS impact and performance (& report findings) ASK a question
    4. 4. Web 2.0 an attitude more than a technology <ul><li>collaborative in nature </li></ul><ul><li>interactive </li></ul><ul><li>dynamic; perpetually “beta” </li></ul><ul><li>blurred line between creation & consumption of content </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Personal web pages  blogs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Text-based tutorials  streaming media applications </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Taxonomies  folksonomies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Q&A email reference  instant messaging, virtual reference </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>OPAC  personalised interface </li></ul></ul><ul><li>“ Web 2.0 is a matrix of dialogues, not a collection of monologues” Jack Maness, Webology </li></ul>EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    5. 5. Library 2.0 62 views and 7 definitions <ul><li>October 2005 - the term “Library 2.0” coined </li></ul><ul><li>By January 2006 - 62 views and 7 definitions were collected. These include, Library 2.0 is : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>not about technology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>all about technology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>a new name for ideas librarians have been discussing for quite some time </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>means making your library’s space (virtual and physical) more interactive, collaborative and driven by community needs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>a more intensive way of sharing all the resources that the library already offers </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Walt Crawford, Cites and Insights </li></ul>EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    6. 6. Library 2.0 user centered change <ul><li>“… seeks to break down barriers: barriers librarians have placed on services, barriers of place and time and barriers inherent in what we do ” </li></ul><ul><li>Michael Stephens, tametheweb.com </li></ul><ul><li>“… is where the user is, when the user is there” </li></ul><ul><li>Stephen Abram, SirsiOneSource </li></ul><ul><li>“ Any service, physical or virtual, that successfully reaches users, is evaluated frequently, and makes use of customer input is a Library 2.0 service” </li></ul><ul><li>Michael Casey & Laura Savastinuk, Library Journal </li></ul>EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    7. 7. Librarian 2.0 … <ul><li>… plans for their users – proposals based on user needs and wants </li></ul><ul><li>… embraces Web 2.0 tools – building connections online wherever user are (beyond library website) </li></ul><ul><li>… controls technolust – technology is put to the test – does it meet users need in a new or improved way? </li></ul><ul><li>… makes good, yet fast decisions – brings evidence to the table for from scholarly journals and blogosphere </li></ul><ul><li>… is a trendspotter – reads outside the profession and watches for the impact of technology on users and new thinking on business </li></ul><ul><li>… gets content – future of libraries guided by how users access, consume and create content </li></ul>EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    8. 8. Librarian 2.0 … <ul><li>… listens to staff and users when planning, </li></ul><ul><li>… tells the stories of successes and failures , learns from both, celebrates those successes, </li></ul><ul><li>… allows staff time to play and learn, and </li></ul><ul><li>… never stops dreaming about the best library services. </li></ul><ul><li>Michael Stephens, NextSpace </li></ul>EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    9. 9. EBLIP and Web 2.0 friends or foe? EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey Reflects back on the evidence base. EBLIP Looks beyond standard practice seeking innovation. WEB 2.0 Asks Qs first - a focused Q is the foundation of EBLIP Acts first, and asks (or apologises) later. Subject to technolust Constrained by research literature removed from the “real world” (?)
    10. 10. EBLIP and Web 2.0 best available evidence EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    11. 11. <ul><li>We’re all talking 2.0, but where’s the evidence? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>What people are doing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What makes a difference </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What’s not working </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What can’t work </li></ul></ul>MLA Social Networking Software Survey EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    12. 12. <ul><li>MLA survey earlier this year – 495 responses </li></ul><ul><ul><li>http://sns.mlanet.org/blog/ </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Interesting posts about blocked sites </li></ul><ul><li>Raised various discussion topics, around age, who is doing what etc </li></ul>MLA Social Networking Software Survey EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    13. 13. Australian Health Librarians and Web 2.0 <ul><li>Want to find out who we are and what we do </li></ul><ul><li>First survey of its kind in Australia </li></ul><ul><li>Know that more people are using L2.0 tools </li></ul><ul><li>Confined by MLA survey terms </li></ul><ul><li>Results early in the New Year </li></ul>EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    14. 14. Australian Health Librarians and Web 2.0 <ul><li>Later hearing about some ‘mature’ technology happening in our libraries – we’ve been talking about this for years now </li></ul><ul><li>Work out where to put our energy, what to fight for </li></ul><ul><li>YouTube currently the most-blocked site – what if we want to use it to share training videos? </li></ul><ul><li>Facebook – what’s the point? But I love my igoogle, and think that zoho has real potential </li></ul>EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    15. 15. Dilbert
    16. 16. Australian Health Librarians and Web 2.0 <ul><li>Personal reflections: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Integration of journals with CIAP / more seamless full text integration (eg DOIs, WebCite) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Integration of OPACs with mainstream search engines </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Integration of Amazon etc with OPACs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Tic toc project for journal TOCs </li></ul></ul>EBLIP Web 2.0 EBLIP & Web 2.0 MLA SNS Survey Australian Survey
    17. 17. <ul><li>EBLIP & Web 2.0 can work together </li></ul><ul><li>What the MLA Social Networking Software Survey did </li></ul><ul><li>Please contribute to the Australian Health Librarians and Web 2.0 survey </li></ul>Conclusion
    18. 18. Questions ? Lisa Cotter NSCCH & The University of Newcastle [email_address] Gillian Wood Brian Tutt Library, NSW Health Department [email_address]
    19. 19. References <ul><li>Jack Maness , Webology http://www.webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html </li></ul><ul><li>Walt Crawford , Cites and Insights http://cites.boisestate.edu/civ6i2.pdf </li></ul><ul><li>Michael Stephens , tametheweb.com http://tametheweb.com/2006/02/library_20_discussion_up_at_si.html </li></ul><ul><li>Stephen Abram , SirsiOneSource http://www.imakenews.com/sirsi/e_article000505688.cfm </li></ul><ul><li>Michael Casey & Laura Savastinuk , Library Journal http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6365200.html </li></ul><ul><li>Michael Stephens , NextSpace http://www.oclc.org/nextspace/002/3.htm </li></ul>

    ×