Task 2

Assignment front sheet
Qualification Unit number and title
Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma Public
Services
Unit 8: Psychology of Human and Criminal Behaviour
Student name Assessor name
John Dunphy Antonia Cartwright
Date issued Completion date Submitted on
Task one: 09/11/13
Task two: 29/11/13
Task three: 10/01/13
Task one: 29/11/13
Task two: 10/01/14
Task three: 31/01/14
Assignment title Psychology and Criminal Behaviour
Learning
Outcome
Learning
Outcome
Assessment
Criteria
In this assessment you will have the
opportunity to present evidence that
shows you are able to:
Task
no.
Evidence
(Page no)
LO1
Understand
different
approaches to
psychology.
1.1
Review major approaches to psychology. 1
1.2
Evaluate key personality theories. 1
LO2
Understand
how
psychology can
be used to
benefit the
individual and
the
organisation.
2.1 Analyse how knowledge of psychology can
benefit individuals.
2
2.2 Explain how knowledge of behaviour
theories can support organisations.
2
2.3
Evaluate approaches to conflict
management.
2
LO3
Understand
the causes and
consequences
of prejudice
and
discrimination.
3.1 Explain the origins of prejudice and
discrimination.
3
3.2 Evaluate the consequences of
discrimination and prejudice on individuals
and organisations.
3
3.3 Explain how an individual could
comprehend and control their own
prejudices.
3
LO4
Understand
the major
theories of
criminal
behaviour and
causal factors.
4.1 Review the major theories of criminal
behaviour.
1
4.2 Explain the causal aspects of criminal
behaviour. 1
4.3 Assess influences and factors, which may
account for criminal activity.
1
4.4 Evaluate the impact of crime on victims and
society.
1

Learner declaration
I certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own and research sources are fully
acknowledged.
Student signature: John Dunphy Date: 03 December 2014

In addition to the above PASS criteria, this assignment gives you the opportunity to submit evidence in order to achieve the following MERIT
and DISTINCTION grades
Grade Descriptor Indicative characteristic/s Contextualisation
M1
Select/design and apply
appropriate methods/techniques
Shows relevant theories and techniques
have been applied.
To achieve M1 you must show that you have applied relevant theories
and techniques to the explanation of criminal behaviour (Task 1).
M2
Identify and apply strategies to find
appropriate solutions
Shows relevant theories and techniques
have been applied.
To achieve M2 you must show how relevant psychological theories and
techniques can be applied to individuals, organisations and conflict
management. (Task 2).
M3
Present and communicate
appropriate findings
Shows coherent, logical development
principles/concepts for the intended
audience.
To achieve M3 you must provide a coherent presentation, in which you
logically develop the principles and concepts around prejudice and
discrimination, for your audience. (Task 3).
D1
Use critical reflection to evaluate
own work and justify valid
conclusions
Shows conclusions have been arrived at
through synthesis of ideas and have been
justified.
To achieve D1 you must justify your conclusions about the effectiveness
of psychological and other explanations in explaining criminal behaviour.
(Task 1).
D2
Demonstrate
convergent/lateral/creative
thinking
Shows ideas have been generated and
decisions taken.
To achieve D2 you must make recommendations for how these
psychological theories and techniques could be used in practice, to
benefit individuals, organisations and conflict management.
(Task 2).
D3
Take responsibility for managing
and organising activities
Substantial activities, projects or
investigations have been planned,
managed and organised.
To achieve D3 you must demonstrate substantial planning, organisation
and management of this project. (Task 3).
Please note that for unit assignments assessors should use these or other exemplar indicative characteristics for the individual grade
descriptors from Annexe C of the HN specification or any other relevant indicative characteristics for the particular assignment. The
indicative characteristic should then be contextualised. Only one indicative characteristic per grade descriptor, M2, M2, M3, D1, D2, D3 is
required.

Assignment brief
Unit number and title Unit 8: Psychology of Human and Criminal Behaviour
Qualification Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Public Services
Start date Task one: 09/11/13, Task two: 29/11/13, Task three: 10/01/13
Deadline/hand-in Task two: 29/11/14, Task two: 10/01/14, Task three: 31/01/14
Assessor Antonia Cartwright
Assignment title Psychology and Criminal Behaviour
Purpose of this assignment
Examine how psychological approaches and theories relate to criminal behaviour. Understand how people behave
individually and within organisations the causes and impact of prejudice and discrimination. This assignment places
emphasis on developing a greater understanding how psychology influences behaviour and the impact this has on
criminals, victims and public service organisations.
Scenario
In your role as a consultant psychologist working for the police you have been tasked with creating a number of
documents to advance the professional use of psychology in the police, which may also be of use to other public
services.
Task 1 (1.1, 1.2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, M1 and D1) - Explaining Criminal Behaviour
In your role as a psychology consultant you have been asked to create a written training package for staff working a
a public services training school on key psychological approaches and how these and other factors can affect criminal
behaviour.
Within this training package you must define psychology and review key psychological theories (at least three) and
their validity in explaining criminal behaviour. You need to explain how other fact ors (at least three) such as social
circumstances and other influences may cause crime, and evaluate the effect crime has on victims and society.
Guidance:
Psychological theories could include: cognitive (e.g. Loftus), behaviourist (e.g. Skinner), biological (e.g. Lombroso),
personality (e.g. Eysenck), psychodynamic (e.g. Freud), social learning (e.g. Bandura), or developmental perspective
(e.g. Bowlby).
Other factors could include: socioeconomic pressures (e.g. poverty, drugs, education), influences (e.g. peers, religion
media), individual factors (e.g. repeat victimisation).
Effects on victims and society could include: victim surveys (e.g. Crime Survey for England and Wales), costs (e.g.
rehabilitation, policing, courts), organisations (e.g. victim support, social services).
This information should be used to complete learning outcomes 1 and 4.
To achieve M1 you must show that you have applied relevant theories and techniques to the explanation of criminal
behaviour.
To achieve D1 you must justify your conclusions about the effectiveness of psychological and other explanations in
explaining criminal behaviour.

Word count: 1800
Accurately cite references throughout your work. Provide full references in Harvard APA format in a separate section
titled ‘References’, at the end of your work.
Task 2 (2.1 2.2 2.3 M2 and D2) - Psychology for Individuals and Organisations
In your role as a psychology consultant you have been asked to create an information booklet about how psychology
can be used to benefit individuals and a public services organisation.
Within this booklet you must outline how psychology can benefit individuals (in at least two ways). You must also
explain how psychological knowledge of group dynamics may impact on a public service (in at least two ways) and
how psychological knowledge can be used in conflict management.
This information should be used to complete learning outcome 2.
Guidance:
Individual benefits could include: learning styles (e.g. Kolb, Honey & Mumford), learning theories (e.g. Piaget,
Bandura), behaviourism, communication techniques (e.g. assertiveness).
Group dynamics could include: group tensions, in groups and out groups (e.g. Guzzo), group performance (e.g.
Tavistock Institute), conformity.
Conflict management could include: attitudes, self-knowledge, strategies, models (e.g. Thomas & Kilmann), benefits
and costs.
To achieve M2 you must show how relevant psychological theories and techniques can be applied to individuals,
organisations and conflict management.
To achieve D2 you must make recommendations for how these psychological theories and techniques could be used
practice, to benefit individuals, organisations and conflict management.
Word count: 1200
Task 3 (3.1 3.2 3.3 M3 and D3) – Prejudice and Discrimination
In your role as a psychology consultant you have been asked to write and conduct an electronic presentation for a
local police (or other public service) training school on prejudice and discriminat ion.
You will need to complete a presentation lasting at least 10 minutes (in any electronic format), explaining causes and
consequences of prejudice and discrimination. You will need to include definitions, explanations and examples for
types of prejudice and discrimination. Include self-reflection of your own experience or values held. Use theories or
behavioural models (at least two) to inform your presentation.
You may use typed notes (to be submitted) to supplement your presentation.
Guidance:
Causes and consequences could include: types of prejudice/discrimination, situations, individual’s behavioural contro
other’s behaviour, external causes.
Self-reflection could include: values, beliefs and judgements, other influences (e.g. media, peers, family), stereotype
Theories and models could include: behavioural responses to discrimination or dominance, coping strategies, GW
Allport, Stephan and Stephan, Devine, Plant and Busswell.

Use this information to complete learning outcome 3.
To achieve M3 you must provide a coherent presentation, in which you logically develop the principles and concepts
around prejudice and discrimination, for your audience.
To achieve D3 you must demonstrate substantial planning, organisation and management of this project.
Word count: 1000
Task 1 (1.1, 1.2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, M1 and D1) - Explaining Criminal Behaviour
In your role as a psychology consultant you have been asked to create a written training package for staff working
at a public services training school on key psychological approaches and how these and other factors can affec t
criminal behaviour.
Within this training package you must define psychology and review key psychological theories (at least three) and
their validity in explaining criminal behaviour. You need to explain how other factors (at least three) such as social
circumstances and other influences may cause crime, and evaluate the effect crime has on victims and society.
Guidance:
Psychological theories could include: cognitive (e.g. Loftus), behaviourist (e.g. Skinner), biological (e.g. Lombroso),
personality (e.g. Eysenck), psychodynamic (e.g. Freud), social learning (e.g. Bandura), or developmental
perspectives (e.g. Bowlby).
Other factors could include: socioeconomic pressures (e.g. poverty, drugs, education), influences (e.g. peers,
religion, media), individual factors (e.g. repeat victimisation).
Effects on victims and society could include: victim surveys (e.g. Crime Survey for England and Wales), costs (e.g.
rehabilitation, policing, courts), organisations (e.g. victim support, social services).
This information should be used to complete learning outcomes 1 and 4.
To achieve M1 you must show that you have applied relevant theories and techniques to the explanation of criminal
behaviour.
To achieve D1 you must justify your conclusions about the effectiveness of psychological and other explanations in
explaining criminal behaviour.
Word count: 1800
Accurately cite references throughout your work. Provide full references in Harvard APA format in a separate
section, titled ‘References’, at the end of your work.

Task 2 (2.1 2.2 2.3 M2 and D2) - Psychology for Individuals and Organisations
In your role as a psychology consultant you have been asked to create an information booklet about how
psychology can be used to benefit individuals and a public services organisation.
Within this booklet you must outline how psychology can benefit individuals (in at least two ways). You must also
explain how psychological knowledge of group dynamics may impact on a public service (in at least two ways) and
how psychological knowledge can be used in conflict management.
This information should be used to complete learning outcome 2.
Guidance:
Individual benefits could include: learning styles (e.g. Kolb, Honey & Mumford), learning theories (e.g. Piaget,
Bandura), behaviourism, communication techniques (e.g. assertiveness).
Group dynamics could include: group tensions, in groups and out groups (e.g. Guzzo), group performance (e.g.
Tavistock Institute), conformity.
Conflict management could include: attitudes, self-knowledge, strategies, models (e.g. Thomas & Kilmann), benefit
and costs.
To achieve M2 you must show how relevant psychological theories and techniques can be applied to individuals,
organisations and conflict management.
To achieve D2 you must make recommendations for how these psychological theories and techniques could be used
in practice, to benefit individuals, organisations and conflict management.
Word count: 1200
Accurately cite references throughout your work. Provide full references in Harvard APA format in a separate
section, titled ‘References’, at the end of your work.

Psychology for Individualsand Organisations
2.1
Communication skills
The implementation of
psychology can enhance
body and verballanguage
which can reinforceteam
membership towardsthe
trait of shynessbegin
abolished though out
membersof the teamthat
are nervousnessor
apprehensiveformthe
engagementof social
congregation.
Communication skillscan
also obtain the endeavour
of formulating interpreted
messages.By the actof
body languageforexample
peoplethat aredeaf the
implication of body
languageuseshand
movementsforthepurpose
of understanding an
individual’semotions.
Communicationskillsare alsoindicatedin
primatesbythe use of fundamental sign
language.Forthe purpose of warringoff
predators.Or the implementationof humantraits
e.g.sadness,happinessorfriendship.
Koko-A TalkingGorilla-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NwCrXVU
m_Q

Learning style Stage associated with
Activist
Reflector
Theorist
Pragmatist
Having an experience
Reviewingthe experience
Concluding from the
experience
2.1
Honey and Mumford
Learning styles
Honey and Mumford
adapted David Kolb’s
learning styles modeland
experientiallearning theory
to develop their own
systematicmodelof
learning style, based on
research into manager’s
behaviouraltendencies.
Unlike Kolb’stheoretical
view Honey and Mumford
usesfourlearning styles
summarised associated
stagesupon theLearning
styles explained within the
diagram.
Planning the next steps
(Theorist) To know where
something fits into overall
ideas and concepts; analysis
and logic; begin stretched;
abstract concepts; structure,
clarity
(Theorist) Frivolity, mindless fun;
wasting time; wasting time; not
being able to question; lack of a
timetable and structure.
(Pragmatist) Practical problem
solving; relevance to the
relevance to the real world;
applying learning.
(Pragmatist) Anything theoretical;
learning that focuses too much on
past or future and not present.
Likes Dislikes
(Activist) doing and
experiencing games, practical
activities, anything that is
energetic and involving.
(Activist) sittingaround for too long
working alone theorising having to
listen to others.
(Reflector)Time to think
observe take it all in; watching
others; solitude and time.
(Reflector)Being hurtled into
activity no time to think; crammed
timetables; lack of privacy, no time
to prepare

2.1
Enhanced Understanding of
others
Psychology endeavourson
the ventureof recognising
human emotionsthough
facial,body language,and
speech patterns.This helps
individualsunderstand the
human Medulla oblongata
architecture.While also
unlocking themethodical
networkof Ecological
anthropology.Thisis
delineated by cultural
transformation towards
newenvironments.Humans
formany yearshave
adapted towardsan
understanding of otherfor
examplethe odyssey of
human evolution.Where
Homo sapienscould only
communicatethough
Neanderthallanguagewith
the useof Phonology and
descriptivelinguistics. This
musthavecharacterized
facial emotionswherein the
modern world we usefacial
expressionsto ventare
human traitsforthe
purposeof flagging are
human feelings.
Homo sapiensuse facial expressionstoIdentifyhumantraits
and the odysseyof silentcommutation. Humanemotionsare
channelledthroughthe limbicsystemorthe paleomammalian
brain.Thisnetworkof humanemotionsisconductedwithinthe
amygdalainside the brainscerebral hemispherewhichcontrols
humanemotions.

2.1
Bandura-social leaning
Theory
Albert Bandura (1977)
conducted thetheory of
social leaning who satesthat
learning is endeavoured
though environmental
observation.UnlikeB.F
skinnerwho invented the
theory of operant
conditioning.Bandura
considersthathumansarean
active (information process)
which is known astheheart
of cognitive psychology
wherean individual
systematically processes
information in the sameway
as an analyticalengine
processing knowledge
numeroustimesthough the
brainscerebellum Latin for
the little brain.This part of
the brainsarchitecture
consistof information
systemsthatreceive
coordinatesfroman
individual’sinteraction with
an environment.The
cerebellums centre
endeavourson evolutionary
infrastructure.
AlbertBandura(1977) conductedthe Bobodoll
experimentonthe behaviourof children.The Bobo
experimentdepictedthe actof childrenmirroringviolent
behaviourfrommediaentitiesdisplayingthe actionsof
adultscarryingout physical violence onanimamate
objectcalleda“Bobo doll”.The childrenactedupon
physical symmetrytowardsthe “Bobodoll”.The children
gratuitouslybeatthe Bobodoll senselessuntil theywere
out of energy. The Bobodoll experiment-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqNaLerMNOE

2.1
Bandura (1977) and Honey and Honey
and Munford (1982) are bothlearning
styles which hold the paradox of social
anthropology which referstowardsan
analysisof human behaviour.This
benefitsan individualin societyor the
workplaceto understand human
behaviourismif thatindividualis the
managerof a businessor corporation.
This improvesan individual’sindustry
of knowledgetowardsthehuman
mind.Technics thatsummarizehuman
anthropology andcultural
conceptualisation.Thisimprovesthe
theoretical rectification of human
behaviourismin the workplace.For
examplethe morphology of gratuitous
conflict managementcan appear
disturbing in theeyes of the by
standing subordinate.Butthisis
known astheanatomy of the
individual’spersonality.E.g.
egomania,narcissism,Histrionic
personalitydisorder.TheTechniques
of understanding commination skills
and human emotionshelpsthe
employeeidentify these personalities’
disordersforthe purposeof avoiding
conflict in the workplace
(Histrionicpersonalitydisorder) thisperson
disorderidentifieshumanlustforvanityand
seductive behaviourwhichcanadd towards
antisocial behaviourisminthe workplace.
Thissummarizesanindividual’sneedfor
dramaticachievementandthe powerover
people’semotions.Thiscanalsocreate
conflictwiththe personalityof narcissismif
the histrioniccongregateswiththe office
narcissist.Thiscouldleadtogossipor the
commoncoldshoulderif thatindividual
displaysthe needforconflictorattention.
Histrionicpersonality Gone withthe wind
(1939) -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDiMHz
4nZwQ

2.1
Understanding Body language
skills
Body language skills can
improve an individual’s social
reading signals towards co-
workers or social endeavours.
This can unlock social
infrastructure by
understanding various
message clusters which
indicate an individual’s
emotions and metal status.
Body language is known as the
most important trait of
communication which
consumes more than 50% of
social communication.
Politicians will use body’s
language to domineer there
political opponents. For the
purpose of climbing the
campaign ladder by using
derogatory or disproving body
language towards their
political rival campaigner.
In The worldof politicsbodylanguage displaysthe
confidence of the candidate whichcouldmake or
breakthe candidate’scampaign.
The secrets of bodylanguage-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCB3ebJjI1Q

2.1
JeanPiaget(1896-1980) the
stagesof Development
JeanPiagetwasknownas a
Phenomenoninthe
physiological field.Piagethad
not one qualificationwithin
Physiological studies.Piaget
inventedthe theoryof cognitive
developmentepistemology
knowledge andchildgrowth
uponobservational tests.The
seriesof conductedtests
revealedmultifariousstagesof
a child’sviewonsociety.There
are fourstagesof development
knownas
sensorimotor/Preoperation/con
Concrete operationl/Formal
operational whichisdisplayed
inthe diagram.Piagetis
extremelyinfluential in
developingprimaryeducation
towardschildren.The cognitive
theoryconductedthe
evaluationof childprogression
whichelucidatedachild’s
adaptationthroughoutsocial
learningwithinacademic
evolution.
The
Sensorimotor
0-2 years
Key Feature
Object Permanence
Research study
Blanket and Ball study
The
Preoperational
2-7 years
Key Feature
Egocentrism
Research study
Three Mountains
The
Concrete Operational
7-11 years
Key Feature
Conservation
Research study
Conservationof Number
The
Formal
Operational
11 years+
Key Feature
Manipulate ideals in
head e.g. Abstract
Reasoning
Research study
Pendulum Task

2.2
Regret Theory
The Regret Theory summarisesan individualforeseeing Regret
if thatindividualmakesthe wrong decision.The theory is
designed forthe purposeof investigating thefearof regret in
the art of financialinvesting or impulsebehaviour.Thefearof
regret motivatesan individualtowardstaken a risk without
thinking abouttheconsequences.Forexample(Keynesians
economics) which displaystheimpulse of spending throughout
the economy. An individualwhomspendsvariouswealthinto
the economy will help boosttheaggregatedemand. Other
peoplewho saveor invest their wealth into theeconomy will
havean abundanceof wealth in there saving bounds.
Individualswhomspend towardstheeconomy butarerecently
hit by therecession will borrow money fromorganizations
thatlend vastamountsof wealth towardscapitalistswho
spend withoutregret.This is known asa fiscal policy which is
used by thegovernmentto adjustitsspending levels and tax
rates forthe purposeof monitoring and influencing the
nation’seconomy.Notso smartCapitalistswill spend and
borrow withoutregretas smartcapitalistswill workand save
towardscontributing towardsinvestmentorganizations.This
could create a monetary policy wherethe governmentcontrols
the behaviourof spending by notso smartcapitalists.
Capitalistswhomcreateinflation by their habitof
consumerism. Can beaffected by the rise and fall of economic
balancetowardssociety. Hyperinflation can influencethe
non-regretof capitalistthefttowardstheworking-class
capitalist thatsavesand investsmoney forthe dreamof a
better life. Affluentcapitalistswill still go on spending without
remorseof hyperinflation affecting theworking-class. Thiswill
only benefit corporationsand Monopoly’stowardsAffluent
society.This summarisesan individualsneed to consume
towardscapitalismwithouttheregret of losing vastamounts
of wealth.
How doesunderstandingthe RegretTheory
Helporganizations?
To emphasize the regrettheorytowards
organizationsyoumustanalyse the gripof
conformityuponthe individualsmind.The
individualthatworksforan enterprise will
mainlyfocusuponthe dreamof one day
beginsuccessful. Cynical organizationswill
the regrettheoryto influencecustomersor
employeestofundraise thereorganizationby
usingthe methodof conformity.E.g.Dave
investedhiswageswithinthe companyDave
workedwithforTenyearsand received50
thousandsoBob theninvests60 Thousand
out of the behaviourof conformity.If Dave or
Bob losesthere investmentthe companystill
wins.

2.2
Cognitive Psychology
B.F skinner- Operating
conditioning and free will conducted
on clade columbidaes displayed the
actions of operant conditioning. This
reinforces the on clade columbidaes
towards obeying movement and
instructions on demand. Operating
conditioning can also be used upon
Homo sapiens for example a human
will never work towards anything
without a goal in front of the
individual’s transcendence. Economic
or career path transcendence is only
just two of the goals that human
aspire to climb within their life time.
All Binominal nomenclature entities
aspire towards the goal of survival
drawn towards food substance or
shelters without these vital entities
are metal state or are purpose of
hierarchical endeavours will be the
victim of extinction. Homo sapiens in
the 20th century are known for the
consumption of commercialism
towards the state of western culture.
E.g. materialism which is known for
the birth of capitalism. Originations
will prey upon pathological
shopaholics for the purpose of the
customer regurgitating their need for
materialism. In fact people mirror B.F
skinners pigeons by attending a
ritual throughout their lives. The
pigeons where kept in a small box but
are well as Homo sapiens kept in a
small world confined towards
regurgitation.
B.F skinnersoperatingconditioning-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhvaSEJtOV8
How doesB.Fskinnerstheoryhelporganizations?
We as Homosapiensrelease highlevelsof euphoria
withinthe brainscerebral cortex whenwe are
rewarded.Withinthe workenvironmentwe are aurally
conditionedweeklyforexample everyHomosapiens
withinthe workestablishmentisgivenatype of
agendawhichhelpsusas Homosapiensgetthough
work.For example havingacigarette breakat lunch
time if the mangerallowsthe individual toattenda
cigarette breakthenthe individual will be conditioned
to workharder towardsthe nextcigarette break.

2.2
Classic conditioning
Pavlov’s Dogs
Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov conducted an
accidental experiment on dog which was later to
be known as classic conditioning. Pavlov noticed
that dogs salivated over food when Pavlov entered
the room. Pavlov began to conduct an experiment
on a germen shepherd. A tube was connected onto
the dog’s neck which was implemented towards
catching the dog’s saliva. Pavlov’s belied that the
dog’s salvia was produced by a fixed nervous
reflex. After hours of monitoring it was conformed
that the dog dewed when the dog had contacted
food. Pavlov named the reposed the salvation Felix.
Pavlov’s experiment started to discombobulate
after the dog salivated into the tube before the
experiment was conducted. Pavlov then placed
screens around the dog for the purpose of blocking
his eye sight. Pavlov then introduced a stimulus
towards the dog’s senses by the use of a ticking
metronome. Food upon a dog dish was placed
threw a hole between the screens. At first the dog
dripped saliva inside the tube when the food
appeared. But after a number of experiments the
dog began to connect the sound of the metronome
towards the indication that food would arrive
within seconds. The sound of the metronome
stared to make the dog produce salvia. Other
metronomes where later on produced into the
experiment and yet again the dogs stimulus began
to salivate over the sounds of the metronomes.
Producing 3,4-dihydroxyphenethylamine and
euphoria within the dogs cerebral cortex
processing information that the dog will receive
food upon the sound of the metronome.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpoLxEN54h
o
Pavlov’sDogsbenefitingorganizations
The experimentconductedondogsbyPavlovcan relate
towardsHomo sapiensbynotthe implantationof a
metronome butthe desire towardsananimate objector
the lustof friendshiporrelationshiptowardsan
individual.Inmyopinionpeopleinthe workplace
actuallyworkwithinthe mannerof potencyif that
personfeelsaninfluence byananimate objector
individualtantalizingthe personrepeatedlythiswill
draw an individual torepeatedlyseekoutthere goal
withinthe workplace. E.g.subjectone named(Andy) is
inlove withsubjecttwonamed(scarlet) scarlethas
histrionicpersonalitydisorderthatenjoystantalizing
men.Andytry’sveryhard towardsgettingscarlet’s
attentionbutsensesthatscarletenjoyscholate every
time scarletentersthe roomAndylustsforher presents.
Andyrunsover towardsscarletandgiveshercholate as
scarletjustignoresthe dearboyand doesnot even
thankAndyfor hiskindoffer.Andycontinuitiestogive
scarletcholateseveryFridaybelievingthatscarletwill
one day talkto Andy.

2.2
Group Dynamics
Belbin’s Team roles
Belbin’s Team roles are defined
by the identification of an
individual’s strengths and
weaknesses within an
organization. This improves
the work environments
architecture by raising self-
awareness and personal
effectiveness. There are nine
team roles depicted within the
workplace which are an
essential towards building a
productive work environment.
Plant
Strengths
 Creative
 Imaginative
 Free-thinking
 Solves
problems
Weaknesses
 Ignores
incidentals
 Too
preoccupied
to
communicate
effectively
Resource
Investigator
I
Strengths
 Outgoing
 Enthusiastic
 Communicative
 Explores
opportunities
 Develops
contacts
Weaknesses
 Over-optimistic
 Losesinterest
once intel
enthusiasmhas
passed
Co-ordinator
Strengths
 Mature
 Confident
 Identifiestalent
 Clarifiesgoals
 Delegateseffectively
Weakness
 May seemmanipulative
 Offloadsownwork
Shaper
 Dynamic
 Challenging
 Courage
 Prone to
provocation
 Offends
people’s
feelings.
Monitor Evaluator
 Sober
 Strategic
 Discerning
 Judges
accurately
 Monitorsall
options
Weakness
 Lacks drive andabilityto
inspire others.
 Can be overcritical
Weakness

Team worker
 Co-operative
 Perceptive
 Diplomatic
 Good listener
 Avertsfriction
Strengths
Weaknesses
 Avoids
confrontation
 Indecisivein
crunch situations
Implementer
Strengths
 Practical
 Reliable
 Efficient
 Organized
Weaknesses
 Inflexible
 Slowto respond
to new
possibilities
Completer finisher
Strengths
 Painstaking
 Conscientious
 Anxious
 Searchesout
errors
Weaknesses
 Inclinedto
worryunduly
 Reluctantto
delegate
Specialist
Strengths
 Single-minded
 Self-starting
 Dedicated
 Provides
knowledge and
skillsinrare
supply’s

Weaknesses
 Contributes only
on a narrow
front
 Dwellson
technicalities

2.2
The Tavistock institute
The Tavistock institute of human relations
supports the development of organisations
under evaluated research into social science.
The institute has offered the development of
social science research towards a range of
clients and partners internationally or within
the United Kingdom. The institute are known
for their actions which adapt towards
significantchanges inside the work
environment and the evolution towards new
technology entering the work environment.
The institute uses these settings inside of the
work environment.
 Organisational issues
 Inter-organisational relations
 Leadership
 The emergence of the knowledge
society
 Issues arising from cultural
differences and diversity
 The delivery and implementation
of public policy
The institute’s systematic network caters
towards sociocultural anthropology for the
purpose of designing effective environmental
work architecture towards the Homo sapien
while ensuring that the development of the
organization and the human is both benefited
from the research conducted by The Tavistock
institute.
The Historyof the Tavistockinstitute
The Tavistockinstitute wasformedin1947 for the
purpose of the researchintoelementsof the wayHomo
sapiensoperate togetherascollaborationinto
organizational andsocial researchmonitoring. Based
outside LondonEnglandthe Tavistockinstitute is also
the nerve centre forpsychological warfare and
propagandapurposes.The Tavistockinstitutewas
knownto have close connectionswithSigmundFreud
and Carl Jung in1938 there study’swhere namedmass
psychology.
How doesTavistockresearch helporganizations?
The Tavistockinstitute endeavoursuponthe journeyof
sociological researcharoundthe workenvironment.The
institute createstheoreticalsummariesconductedon
humanbehaviourism.Thisunlocksthe expansionof
humaninteractiontowardsthe workenvironmentBy
helpingorganizationstowardsthe understanding
humanscience.

2.2
Group Dynamics
By Sigmund Freud
The Behaviour theory of group Dynamics
conducted by Sigmund Freud (1856-
1939) on group psychology and the
Analysis of the ego. Chapter x of the
theory summarises the group and the
primal Horde. Freud mentions that (the
conjecture of Charles Darwin to the
effect that the primitive form of human
society was that of a horde ruled over
despotically by a powerful male). This
unlocks the theory of the Alpha male in
monkeys which mirrors Homo sapien
traits. The Alpha male holds the
psychological totalitarianism by
controlling the group’s common
direction and human emotions. This type
of behaviourism summarises the
knowledge of an organizations
leadership style in this case the
totalitarian manger or Boss whom
controls the organizations
infrastructure. By ruling under
autocracy which is mostly used within
political systems to endeavour
dictatorship mechanisms within society.
Organizations can use Sigmund Freud’s
Analysis of the ego for the purpose of
identifying a leadership style which can
rule the masses without empathy or
feeling towards the individuals the
Manger or Boss is leading.
Fact: Primatesrule underhierarchydominance which
endeavoursarankingsystemof social grouping.The
manifestationhierarchywithinthe primatekingdom
identifiesalphamale leadershipbyengaginginto
conflictwithotherprimates.If the primate winsthe
battle of primitive conflict.The female primatewill
target thatmalestestosterone levelsforthe purpose
of procreation.
Primate hierarchy-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8_zVRC5AaI

2.2
Group Dynamics Part 2
By Sigmund Freud and Gustave Le Bon
Sigmund Freud’s theory of Group Dynamics can be
also found within chapter II of Sigmund Freud’s book
on Le Bon’s Description of the group mind. Gustave Le
Bon a social psychologist, sociologist, anthropologist
inventor, and abecedarian physicist. Elaborates an
infrastructure of physiological group conformity. By
summarising an individual’s characteristics within a
chosen group when an individual joins a group the
individuals mind will feel, think, and act if that
individual where in the state of isolation. An
individual with heterogeneous traits will conform to
shear unity towards their chosen group. This will
enforce conformity towards a person’s mind changing
their actions or systematic ideology. Le Bon explains
that an individual’s feeling or ideas do not in the
slightest fact transform themselves into acts except in
the case of individuals forming a group. Freud
elaborates on Le Bon theory by taking it in liberty to
summarise that Le Bon’s theory does not mention that
an individual joining a conformed group are formed
in unity then there must be some type of element
which draws that individualto conform towards that
chosen group. And that the bound between the
individual and group must accurately define the
individual and group characteristics. This theory Le
Bon summarises connects towards co-worker
conformity which mirrors mundane American high
school movies. For example the Stanger arrives onto
the school grounds in this theoretical summery. The
individual actions identity’s with group leaders and
this allows the individualto conform which group
dynamics if that individual is accepted towards that
sub-culture. Work relationships maintain
organizational independence which develops
friendship within the establishment creating an
anatomy of loyal workers help one another
throughout their time with their chosen work buddy’s
or sub-culture.
Fact: The movie Fightclubelaborateson
groupconformitymultifarioustimes.
Summarisingthe factorof white collarmales
joininganundergroundfightclub/Terrorist
groupagainst the ideologycapitalismin
modernAmerica.

2.2
Group tensions
By Lawrence Frey and Kevin Barge
Lawrence Frey and Kevin Barge
theory of managing group life:
communication in decision-making
groups (1998). This explains a
collection of group behaviour when
team members are given a task
towards accomplishing their goal. A
group member struggling with a
particular task will go through four
stages of group life (entering,
encountering, engaging and ending)
an individual within a chosen group
will be torn between dimensions of
two ideas which are equally valid but
also dispute with each other creating
group tension. A hypothetical
example can relate towards an
individual entering a room the
individual is assigned towards a
group of five. The group is given a
task towards building a rocket ship
for their science class. To make the
rocket ship fly they are given two
elements bio alcohol CnH2n+OH and
Biodiesel. The team members
verbally fight over who takes charge
of the Task Bob has a PHD in Biofuel
and Harry has a Diploma in
engineering. This summarises the
theory two rival elements clash no
matter what their options are.
The theory of group tensions can help
organizations understand the
knowledge behind group debates.
Every individual will quarrel about
any decision if there are two sides
towards the assigned task.

2.2
The Theory of Conformity
Richard crutchfield (1955) Crutchfiled conducted a team of 5
participants side by side within individual booths with a panel
of lights and switches in front of their person. An individual
set of lights was set to be illuminated for the purpose of
indicating the responses of 4 participants. Another set of
switches provided the provided the test subjects with the
means of giving their own responses. The test subjects were
also giving multiple choice questions quoted by Crutchfiled
“The slides call for various kinds of judgements-lengths of
lines areas of figures, logical completion of number series,
vocabulary items, estimates of the opinions of others,
expressions of his own attitudes on issues, expressions of his
own preferences for line drawings……” The test subject where
assigned to always give their response last, having already
seen the supposed responses of the other 4. The lights where
actually manipulated by the experimenter to create a bogus
majorly of responses. Over 600 subjects from different
backgrounds participated in the test Including student’s
women and army officers for 3 days.
The results
 46% conforming towards the incorrect majority
response when asked to compare the size of a circle
and a star –the circle was much larger
 37% of the army officers agree with a bogus majority
statement that they would not make a good leader-
having all said privately beforehand that they
believed that they would make good leaders
 58% of the student test subjects agreed with bogus
majorly statement
 The results mirrored the Asch experiment as 30%
conformed towards bogus answers
 17% of test subjects at rumbled the experiment and
knew what was going on. Crutchfield did not
comment on how this would affect the test
Conformityinorganizations
Withinorganizationsthe knowledge of
conformityisanendeavourtowardsorderand
employeetranscendence.Forexample
conformitysummarisesthe segregationof
groupmentalityonenterpriselevelswhichlock-
downany interference fromoutside entities.
Conformityidentity’sloyal employeesfrom
rebellioussubordinateswhomare considered
communiststowardsthe levelsof
transcendence andfundamental orders
summonedbythe mangeror boss.

Low class
2.2
In groups and out groups
In the field of social
anthropology in groups and
out groups reveal the
characteristics of social
identity. Tajfel (1979)
Proposed that groups e.g.
(social, class, family, football
teams etc.) which people
belonged to where an
important source of pride and
self-esteem. A group gives us a
sense of social identity: a sense
of belonging to the social
world. This unlock the social
identity Theory outline
categorizing sub-cultures
within their social environment
a social group membership
gives an individual a feeling of
belonging which can improve a
person’s self-esteem and social
endeavour. In (1979) a movie
called the warriors
summarised fictional gangs
based upon the real gangs of
New York’s underworld. The
film identified gang warfare
over territories around New
York against in and out groups.
The Warriors-
https://www.youtube.com/wat
ch?v=1ycpmrEl-9E
An example of in and out groups
High class
Punks Yobs
Christians Jews
Males Females
Labour Conservatives
Protestants Catholics
How doesunderstandingthe Theoryof social identityhelp
organizations?
The Theoryhelpsamplifythe stature of social identity
withinthe workenvironment. There are varioussub-
cultureswithinsocietysome getalongsome don’t.How
doesithelpthe workenvironment?Byidentifyingwhat
groupthe individual belongstohelpthatindividualwork
withinaproductive mannerif thatindividual ispaired
withtheirownsub-culture.

2.2
Group performance
Group performance is defined by social
psychology summarised by Baron, Byrne,
and suls (1989). By quoting that “the
scientific field that seeks to understand the
nature and causes of individual behaviour in
social situations”. Social psychology deals
with the behaviourism of the individual in
the presence of others. Group dynamics and
group performance creates an industry of
social influence. Theoretically an individual
is controlled by minority influence. Moscovici
(1976, 1980) summarised the Asch
experiment and stated that in many forms of
conformity studies there was a minority
group who were conforming towards the
majority. He claims that Asch had placed an
abundance of emphasis towards the theory
of the group’s majority having magnitude of
influence on the minority. He stated that it
could be possible for an individual to
influence group option. This unlocks the
history of political movements. For example
Vladimir Lenin founder of the Russian
communist party. During the Bolshevik
Revolution Lenin was a minority of
communists against the Bolshevik ruling
class. Lenin quoted “the worse things are the
better things are” at the time of famine and
shear poverty hit his local village. People
under the Bolshevik government began to
discontent from the Bolshevik government
towards Lenin’s views which helped the
working class of Russia. Many Russians
conformed towards his views as an
individual.
How does the knowledgegroup performance
benefitorganizations?
An individual’sview orideologyamplifies
groupoptionand groupdecisionmaking.For
example if anindividual isthe leaderof a
conformedgroupthenthe possibilityof
groupdecisionswill be delegatedbythe
individualnotthe manger Thisdoescreate
conflictwiththe manger.But on the other
handit benefitsthe managerforthe purpose
of the individualsleadershipbeginincharge
of the groupsdivisiongivingthe mangerless
workto handle.

2.2
Group dynamics within the
The Police
Example 1
The police are known for their
hostile encounters with
members of the public. Group
dynamics with the police helps
the police understand the
system of behaviours within
social anthropology. For
example understanding body
language of a group’s
behaviour ciphers an
abundance of knowledge
within a socialgroup. For
example a post-riot if a group
of delinquents gathers outside
a city centre and within men’s
rea the group show the
dynamics of criminal behaviour
then the police will identify the
morphology of criminal
behaviour though the
dimension of visual group
dynamics.
Fact: people imitate ananatomyof evolutionformatting
the structure of humanphysics.Peopleare like of
Protons,Electrons,andNeutronsconductingvarious
emotionsthroughoutsociety. Whenanideologyorview
synopsizesgroupopinionitreleasescapaciousnessrange
amongthe crowdcreatingan angry mob.
The depictionof anangry mob-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLvGnro4Cgw

2.2
Group Dynamics within the
police
Example 2
Group Dynamics within the
police understands the
automation of behavioural
economics. For example within
the police force a group of
officers are better than one
officerif the officeris
outnumbered by a group of
undesirable individuals. Group
dynamics productively
influences communication and
social economics. Group
dynamics upholds industrial
dimensions towards the
architecture of Team
management. While using a
network of sociology that can
influence a peace of mind
towards the officer it that
officerfeels in danger when
engaging a dangerous
situation.

2.3
M2
Part 1
Sherif etal.(1988)
(Muzafersherif) wasaTurkish-
Americansocial psychologist.He
conductedan experimentcalled
RobbersCave whichinvolveda
groupof boysat summercamp who
had nevermetbefore.The Boys
were separatedintotwoteamsand
where askedtoengage in
completive taskswithconflicting
goals.The dilemmawiththe tasks
where thatthe goal couldonlybe
achievedonlyatthe otherteam’s
expense the tasksincludedsports
and tournaments. Intergroup
deliberationescalatedquickly
leadingtowardsverbal conflict. This
theorycan relate towardsvarious
organizationse.g.the publicservice.
Whichcouldinvolve membersof an
operationfightingoverformatteda
task.This can leadtowardsa mutiny
againstauthoritarianleaders
Resultinginintergroupconflict. By
theoreticallyidentifyinggroup
conflictwhichSherif summarized
the problembehindthe taskisnot
the task itself butthe group’s
optionsinfrontof the task.Every
groupgivenan assignmentmustbe
givena delegatedrole toensure
that everyone hasademocraticsay
on the matterof the task givenat
hand.Ensuringthat a mutinydoes
not expandthroughoutthe group.
Fact: Mutinyon the bountydepictsthe configurationof the
war of the upperandlowerclassesasa shipistakenoverby
a Mutiny takenoverthe captain’sship.
Mutinyon the Bounty-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3vtKU9bi10

2.3
M2
Part 2
The John Dunphy Theoretical approach towards Conflict
Management
The Sociologicalspectrum (2014)
We as Homo sapiens within the 20th century live inside a sociological
spectrum that defines are emotional automation within the
contraception of how we perceive others though are Medulla
Oblongata morphology. The brains cerebral cortex processes are
emotional status mirroring a roulette table’s ping pong ball landing
on a random number. Within clusters of society we share conflict
with random personalities within the public infrastructures
sociologicalspectrum. The public service e.g. the police delegates
order throughout civilization. In my option by examining the
criminal mind we could tap into their traits. Criminal architecture is
built upon high levels of testosterone directed at the police because
they represent a system that failed there sociologicalneeds. We can
use new techniques of conflict management over archaic techniques
by allowing these groups to vent their anger towards an enclosed
society if debauched behaviour is displayed by the individual. Now
we could regurgitate the prison system locking the individual within
an aggressive domain or we could educated that individualwithin a
program depicting that person’s view on society displaying their
behaviour on screen showing the individuals rage upon society. Any
Homo sapien will feel embarrassed of their public outrage recorded
in front of their very eyes. We need to push the education of verbal
abuse upon organizations or the public service cultivating citizens
and staff members that uncivilized behaviour will not be tolerated
within society and that an individual can be fined or placed within
an education system to develop there negative behaviour into
positive behaviour which will monitor there psychodynamic
emotions though step by step anger management or social economic
behavioural classes which will shape their aggressive emotions into
positive emotions.
Fact: we live withinhighwaysof hypersonic
conflict.Forexample we couldclashwe the
mechanicsof aggressive social science upon
the streetif an individualtakesan
uncivilizedlikentowardsare ideologyor
presentswhichunravelsbullyorprimitive
behaviourismtowardsnew characteristics.
Conflictbattlesare quite nimble atfirste.g.
road rage or bumpingintoaperson
anciently.Butitcouldexpandintothe rage
dynamicsleadingintophysical orverbal
conflictbetweentwoindividualscrossing
overtowardscriminal behaviourism.
Fact: there are numerouscharacteristics
withinsocietysspectrum.Fromthe viewof
social anthropologyconflictmanagementis
displayedall aroundus.Forexample acourt
hearingdisplaystwowarringfactionsovera
dispute.Butwithinthe courtholdsthe key
towardssupressingthe agreementthe
autocratic Judge whomhascontrol overthe
environmentsanatomy.Thisasksthe
questioncouldalevel of powerstopthe
configurationof anargumentfromarising?

2.3
M2
Part 3
Rahim and Bonoma (1979)
Rahim and Bonoma
constructed a theory of the
styles of handling interpersonal
conflict on two basic
dimensions which contested of
the concern for self and the
concern for others. The first
dimension explains the degree
of (High or Low) to which an
individual attempts to mollify
his or her concern. The second
dimension explains the degree
of (high or low) to which an
individual wants to satisfy the
concern of others. Both
dimensions portray
motivational direction which of
a given individual towards a
conflict. The dimensions
summarise individualistic
human behaviourism within
contrast towards the
workplace. The dichotomy of
the dimensions synopsizes
human narcissism vs empathy
which can create abundance
within the work environment.
Ruble and Thomas (1976) and
Van de Vliert and Kabnoff
(1990) have supported the idea
of two dimensions conflicting.
The combination of these two
dimensions summarises five
multifarious styles of handling
interpersonal conflict.
Integratingstyle
Thisstyle indicateshighconcernforself and
other.Thisstyle isalsoknownforits problem
solvingskills.Thisalsoinvolvescollaboration
betweentwopartiese.g.opennessexchange
of informationandexaminationof differences
to reach a goal acceptable towardsboth
Parties.
Obligingstyle
Thisstyle summarisesLow concernforself and
highconcernfor others.Thisisalsoas
accommodatingpeople’sneeds. Thisstyle is
highlyknownforemphasizingthere formation
for the purpose of satisfyingthe otherparty.
Dominatingstyle
Thisstyle summarisesthe systemof narcissism
dominatinglow level subordinatesthoughan
autocratic style.The narcissistwill use awin-
lose formationtowardsconflictmanagement
by usinga structure of powertowardsthe
warringparty.The style isextremelyDogmatic
towardsthe subordinate imposingan
accumulationof noconcern foran individual’s
feelings.
Avoidingstyle
Thisstyle forthe individual’sself-esteemand
otherswhichisknownas self-suppression. An
individualwiththisstylewillavoidconflictatall
costs.Which will summarizeback-steppingor
postponinganissue withthe rival partyfora
numberof days until the partycontact again.
Compromisingstyle
Thisstyle indicatesintermediateinconcernfor
the individualsself-gainandothers.Itinvolves
the leadershipstyleof agive-and-take nature
towardsmanagementconflict.Thismayalso
accumulate tradingconcessionorseekinga
quickmiddle grouppositionbetweenthe two
parties.

2.3
M2
Part 2
Rahim and Bonoma (1979)
Rahim and Bonoma theory
summarises organizational
conflict by monitoring the
architecture of the individual’s
emotions. Within the public
services e.g. the police will
conflict within immense status
of confrontational situations.
Group conflict can arise within
any moment within the
environment of verbal or
physical violence. For example
the chief of police will have to
identify these five styles of
human anthropology for the
purpose of foreseeing social
conflict within the team of
police officers. The theory
upholds vital keys towards
cultural phenomena which can
endeavour a chain of ethnics
towards battling conflict
management within the work
environment

2.3
D1
How does The Sociologicalspectrum (2014) help individuals
and organisation in conflict Management work?
The individual that displays narcissistic trait hypothetically”
try’s to rule the roost”. The work place is built on highways of
sociologicaldifferences traveling around imitating protons,
electrons and neutrons. We are built upon the status of human
science within the rebounds of society’s changing evolutionary
structure. But a summary of negative emotions can stop are
evolutionary growth leading towards sociologicalbreak down if
the world was a negative the positive will be the victims of
extinction. Now if I was to elaborate upon my created theory I
believe that most individuals that are born a negative will only
responded towards a negative within controversial terminology
“power is only fought towards power if that individuallacks
emotion towards hurting an individual’s emotions”. To stop
conflict management within the area of an autocrat you will
have to summarise your status by playing the autocrat at their
own game without using conflict. The autocrat will normally be
a narcissist. Vindictive narcissists are just one vehicle upon the
highway of the Sociologicalspectrum. You must first catch the
narcissist of guard. This is discovered within the debate of
where David Frost catches Richard Nixon on a lie. If you catch
the narcissist out upon their own logic they feel demeaned and
frightened within their contested of intellectual wit but all
narcissist have a boiling point so be careful of you engagement
with the narcissist. Psych analyzation of the narcissism within
the negative side of the Sociological spectrum helps
organizations e.g. The Public services or corporations to identify
human emotions or Reading lies and bulling type behaviourism.
This will help an individualat the work environment to fight
negative narcissism with positive emotion with the
incorporation of positive wit and a strong poker face. The police
will accumulate a greater knowledge towards conflict
management if the anatomy of human science is educated
toward members of the police department. This will educate the
gift of summarising the world as protons, electrons and
neutrons for the laymen positive and negative entity’s within
the world’s stratosphere.
How to stopthe Narcissist:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtkRM0LS
wx8
Fact: Narcissismiscreatedthoughthe
childhoodof the affluentorthe sociably
neglected. Thiscreatesthe vehicle of the
negative uponthe highwayof the sociological
spectrumcreatinga controversial monopoly
betweenopposedclasses.Narcissismisinfact a
trait of a serial killerthe traitwasfoundin(Ted
Bundy) an Americanserial killer.

2.3
D1.
How does Rahim and Bonoma
(1979) theory help individuals
and organisation in conflict
Management work?
Rahim and Bonoma theory
(1979) elaborates upon two
dimensions of emotions the first
elaborating on the empathy
towards concerning towards
others and the second dimension
summarising the lack of empathy
towards concerning towards
human emotions. Both unlock
five elements of human
leadership skills clashing a
formation of human social
anthropology. How does it deal
with organisational conflict
management within the work
environment? The theory
summarises the dogmatic
totalitarians from the democratic
or non-confrontational
personalities. The theory helps
enterprises or the public service
endeavour the anatomy of
human economics. By
categorizing individuals by their
personality’s configuration such
as Belbin’s Team roles. It
constructs systematic order by
gathering Intel on emotional
actions. While unlocking
hypersonic automation towards
categorizing people into groups
that fit their personality avoiding
conflict with other cultures or
rival personality’s.

2.3
D1
How does The Robbers Cave experiment
help individuals and organisation in
conflict Management work?
The Robbers cave experiment known as
the Realistic conflict Theory elaborates
upon stereotypical completion between
Homo sapiens and fighting for survival
within the era of prehistoric birth. Today
within the 20th century we live within the
survival of ego. This normally leads
towards conflict within large
organisation to the public services. The
experiment displayed two warring
factions over task dynamics within the
common sear antics of young men. Now
this is all in good humour to see people
fighting even within their adult hood
without the affable approach towards
the situation. We can learn an
abundance of techniques from robbers
cave towards individuals within
enterprises or the public service by
presenting a leader towards the group’s
morphology assigning roles towards the
Groups team members ensuring that
every group member has their appointed
view summarised by the leader before it
is placed into action. Summarising the
inventory of Charles Darwin’s
evolutionary theory we are not that
different to animalistic behaviourism. “If
I was to be so crude” I would compare
the transcendence of human culture to
wolfs fighting for survival over food
resources. Summarising the quote
“survival of the fittest”.

harvard referencing
M. Afzalur Rahim (2011). Managing conflict in organizations. 4th ed. New Brunswick, New
Jersey: Transaction Publishers. 299.
Saul McLeod. (2008). Robers Cave Experiment. Available:
http://www.simplypsychology.org/robbers-cave.html. Last accessed 22 Dec 2014.
John Dunphy. (2014). The Sociological spectrum . Available: N/A. Last accessed N/A.
Saul McLeod. (2007). Social Psychology. Available: http://www.simplypsychology.org/social-
psychology.html. Last accessed 22 Dec 2014.
Saul McLeod. (2008). Social Identity Theory. Available:
http://www.simplypsychology.org/social-identity-theory.html. Last accessed 22 Dec 2014.
Richard Crutchfield . ((1955)). replace people with lights - still get 30 percent conformity .
Available: http://www.integratedsociopsychology.net/Conformity-
Majority_Influence/RichardCrutchfield%281955%29.replacepeoplewi.html. Last accessed 23
Dec.
Lawrence Frey and Kevin Barge. (1998). Dialectical Tensions in Task Groups. Available:
http://www.uky.edu/~drlane/capstone/group/dialtensions.html. Last accessed Dec 23.
Saul McLeod. (2011). Bandura - Social Learning Theory. Available:
http://www.simplypsychology.org/bandura.html. Last accessed 23 Dec.
BBC motion gallery . (N/A). Pavlov's Dogs Get Conditioned. Available:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpoLxEN54ho. Last accessed Dec 23.
Graham Loomes and Robert Sugden. (N/A). Regret Theory. Available:
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2232669?sid=21105502070163&uid=4&uid=2&uid=
3738032. Last accessed 23 Dec.

Alan S. Blinder. (N/A). keynesian economics. Available:
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/KeynesianEconomics.html. Last accessed 23 Dec.
Rogers, J.. ((2001) ). Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles. Available: http://repository-
intralibrary.leedsmet.ac.uk/open_virtual_file_path/i391n604179t/LearningStylesSrc/7.Learn
ing+styles/LS-honeymumford.html. Last accessed 23 Dec.
Saul McLeod. (2009, updated 2012). Jean Piaget. Available:
http://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html. Last accessed 23 Dec.
N/A. (Jun 18, 2009). B.F. Skinner - Operant Conditioning and Free Will. Available:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhvaSEJtOV8. Last accessed 23 Dec.

Task 2

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (17)

Similar to Task 2

Similar to Task 2 (20)

Task 2