Combining Historic Interpretations of the Great Britain Population With Contemporary Spatial Analysis: the Case of Surname...
Two sections:<br />1. “Homes of Family Names in Great Britain” <br />					(Guppy, 1890).<br />2. Contemporary Spatial Anal...
Homes of Family Names in Great Britain*.<br /><ul><li>Obtained approx. 8000 unique surnames from Kelly’s Post Office Direc...
Surnames were selected from Yeoman due to their “stationary habits and purity of extraction”.
Each name was also required to have a relative frequency of > 7/1000.
Created a matrix of with counties along the top and surnames down the side.
Developed a “button system”.
Sadly no maps...</li></ul>Nationaal Herbarium, Nederland<br />* Freely downloadable from archive.org<br />
Contemporary Spatial Analysis:The 1881 Census*<br /><ul><li> 29 Million People.
 425, 793 Surnames.
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

IEEE Geospatial Computing: Spatial Analysis of Historic Surname Patterns in Great Britain

986 views
929 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
986
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

IEEE Geospatial Computing: Spatial Analysis of Historic Surname Patterns in Great Britain

  1. 1. Combining Historic Interpretations of the Great Britain Population With Contemporary Spatial Analysis: the Case of Surnames<br />James Cheshire<br />Department of Geography and Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis,<br />University College London <br />james.cheshire@ucl.ac.uk spatialanalysis.co.uk<br />
  2. 2. Two sections:<br />1. “Homes of Family Names in Great Britain” <br /> (Guppy, 1890).<br />2. Contemporary Spatial Analysis.<br />The 1881 Census<br />Methods: <br />Lasker Distance<br />Hierarchical Clustering<br />
  3. 3. Homes of Family Names in Great Britain*.<br /><ul><li>Obtained approx. 8000 unique surnames from Kelly’s Post Office Directory.
  4. 4. Surnames were selected from Yeoman due to their “stationary habits and purity of extraction”.
  5. 5. Each name was also required to have a relative frequency of > 7/1000.
  6. 6. Created a matrix of with counties along the top and surnames down the side.
  7. 7. Developed a “button system”.
  8. 8. Sadly no maps...</li></ul>Nationaal Herbarium, Nederland<br />* Freely downloadable from archive.org<br />
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11. Contemporary Spatial Analysis:The 1881 Census*<br /><ul><li> 29 Million People.
  12. 12. 425, 793 Surnames.
  13. 13. 345, 781 <10 occurrences.
  14. 14. All surnames used.
  15. 15. 657 Registration Districts.** </li></ul>*Obtained from the UK Data Archive. Website:www.data-archive.ac.uk<br />** Downloadable from UK Borders. Website: http://edina.ac.uk/ukborders/<br />
  16. 16. Contemporary Spatial Analysis: Methods<br />Lasker Distance Calculation using the frequency of each surname within each registration district. <br />
  17. 17. 1881 Census Surname Regions<br />7 Clusters<br />20 Clusters<br />
  18. 18. Summary<br />Two very different approaches:<br />Guppy:<br />Deductive.<br />Sampled only yeoman.<br /> Cheshire:<br />Inductive.<br />“Complete” population.<br />Surprisingly similar results.<br />
  19. 19. Guppy said in 1881...<br />
  20. 20. It has taken 120 years but we can now do as he asked...<br />
  21. 21. ...and more<br />Surname Localities<br />Danelaw<br />

×