13. Spot checks every 100 strides
Use an RHS approach to % cover
0 %, < 33 %, > 33 %, > 66 %
Feedback
Good results
Positive volunteers
Some subjectivity
Access difficulties
Hard to summarise at field scale
14. • Was I picking up more/less issues than everybody else?
• Was my severity score consistently bias?
• Did I record anything irrelevant?
• Were my photos useful?
Giving
Feedback
18. Wet weather
Surveys
• Is the pathway where the model says it is?
• Is it a stream, a drainage ditch or an overland flow?
• Is it carrying a lot of sediment?
• How fast is the flow?
• Is water running off roads and tracks?
• Are pipes bringing in sediment?
• Where is water pooling?
• What is the land use and riparian margin?
• Are there any landscape features that hold
• sediment/water?
23. • River Ure in Wensleydale
• Anecdotal evidence of declining quali
• Lower invertebrate abundance
• Algal blooms
• Fish kills
• EA data hasn’t picked up a problem
What’s happening?
Water Quality monitoring
24. • Landscape scale
• Partnership project
• Focus on community involveme
• Sharing memories of the river
• Understanding dairy industry
• Water friendly farming
Water Quality monitoring
YorPast UreFuture
25. Water Quality monitoring
Palintest - 10 kits
Nitrate, Phosphate, Ammonia
£3 per test
Reproducibility?
How often?
What conditions?
How many locations?
How good is dip test data?