Olv1 (short circuit analysis)2

•

1 like•452 views

wimbo_h

One-Line Diagram - OLV1 (Short-Circuit Analysis)
page 1 09:45:15 Jun 23, 2013 Project File: SC
Switchgear 11kV Pabrik-2 11 kV
0% 0
30,05 kA -87,4
MCC-10
0,525 kV
15,71% -18,3SWGR-11
6,9 kV
8,81% -31,7
SWGR-9
6,9 kV
11,35% -30,7
SWGR-8
6,9 kV
10,79% -30,7SWGR-5
6,9 kV
14,13% -36,8MCC-3
0,525 kV
10,42% -20,1
MCC-4
0,525 kV
13,55% -20,4
MCC-7
0,525 kV
5,72% -21
MCC-6
0,4 kV
2,82% -20,8
Sistem Integrasi
LINE 4 2010 U
30,4 MW
12,39
UREA STORAGE
114 kVA
0,698
0,698
TR-6
1 MVA
Cable6
SEAWATER INTAKE MCC7
180 kVA
0,818
0,818
TR-7
0,75 MVA
Cable7
UREA PLANT 525V
925 kVA
3,86
3,86
TR-4
1,5 MVA
Cable4
AMMONIA PLANT 525V
725 kVA
2,97
2,97
TR-3
1,5 MVA
Cable3
UREA PLANT 6,9kV
800 kVA
0,352
0,352
TR-5
1,5 MVA
Cable5
SEAWATER INTAKE MCC8
1942 kVA
0,885
0,885
TR-8
5 MVA
Cable8
SEAWATER INTAKE MCC9
2055 kVA
0,931
0,931
TR-9
5 MVA
Cable9
OFFSITE SWGR 6,6kV
1523 kVA
0,71
0,71
TR-11
5 MVA
Cable11
OFFSITE SWGR 525V
1094 kVA
4,46
4,46
TR-10
1,5 MVA
Cable10
101-JAM
6705 HP
1,9
Cable12
K2-TR-01
35 MVA
AMMONIA PLANT 525V
725 kVA
UREA PLANT 525V
925 kVA UREA PLANT 6,9kV
800 kVA
UREA STORAGE
114 kVA
SEAWATER INTAKE MCC7
180 kVA
SEAWATER INTAKE MCC8
1942 kVA
SEAWATER INTAKE MCC9
2055 kVA
OFFSITE SWGR 525V
1094 kVA
OFFSITE SWGR 6,6kV
1523 kVA
Sistem Integrasi
13,41
2010 U
30,4 MW
Cable3 Cable4 Cable5 Cable6 Cable7 Cable8 Cable9 Cable10 Cable11 Cable12
LINE 4
TR-3
1,5 MVA
TR-4
1,5 MVA
TR-5
1,5 MVA
TR-6
1 MVA
TR-7
0,75 MVA
TR-8
5 MVA
TR-9
5 MVA
TR-10
1,5 MVA
TR-11
5 MVA
K2-TR-01
35 MVA
Switchgear 11kV Pabrik-2 11 kV
MCC-3
0,525 kV
MCC-4
0,525 kV
SWGR-5
6,9 kV
MCC-6
0,4 kV
MCC-7
0,525 kV
SWGR-8
6,9 kV
SWGR-9
6,9 kV
MCC-10
0,525 kV
SWGR-11
6,9 kV
101-JAM
6705 HP
0,142 0,184 0,22 0,025 0,039 0,555 0,584 0,213 0,445 1,9
8,81% -31,7
15,71% -18,3
11,35% -30,7
10,79% -30,7
5,72% -212,82% -20,8
14,13% -36,8
13,55% -20,4
10,42% -20,1
0% 0
30,05 kA -87,4
12,39
0,025 0,0390,1840,142 0,22 0,555 0,584 0,4450,213 1,9
2,97 3,86 0,352 0,698 0,818 0,885 0,931 4,46 0,71
2,97 3,86 0,698 0,818 0,885 0,931 4,46 0,71
0,352
1,9
13,41

Viewers also liked

Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)

IJERD Editor

Biogeography-based optimization (BBO) is a new population-based evolutionary algorithm and one of meta-heuristic algorithms. This technique is based on an old mathematical study that explains the geographical distribution of biological organisms. The first original form of BBO was introduced in 2008 and known as a partial migration based BBO. Few months later, BBO was re-introduced again with additional three other forms and known as single, simplified partial, and simplified single migration based BBOs. Then a lot of modifications were employed to enhance the performance of BBO. However, the literature lacks the explanations and the reasons on which the modifications are based on. This paper tries to clarify this issue by making a comparison between the four original BBO algorithms through a variety of benchmark functions with different dimensions and complexities. The results show that both single and simplified single migration based BBOs are faster, but have less performance as compared to the others. The comparison between the partial and the simplified partial migration based BBOs shows that the preference depends on the population size, problem’s complexity and dimensions and the values of the upper and lower side constraints. The partial migration model wins when these factors, except population size, are increased, and vice versa for the simplified partial migration model. The results can be used as a foundation and a first step of modification for enhancing any proposed modification on BBO including the existing modifications that are described in literature.

Performance Comparison Between the Original Forms of Biogeography-Based Optim...

XperiaZ1

This paper presents a unique and novel method to determine the weakest branch or heavily loaded branch of a radial distribution system by considering reactive loading index range. It is shown that the branch, at which the value of reactive loading index is minimum, is considered to be the weakest branch or heavily loaded branch of the system. The effectiveness of the proposed method has been successfully tested in 12 bus radial distribution system and the results are found to be in very good agreement.

Determination of the Weakest Branch in a Radial Distribution System using Rea...

IDES Editor

In radial distribution systems, the voltages at buses reduces when moved away from the substation, also the losses are high. The reason for decrease in voltage and high losses is the insufficient amount of reactive power, which can be provided by the shunt capacitors. For this purpose, in this paper, two stage methodologies are used. In first stage, the load flow of pre-compensated distribution system is carried out using ‘Dimension reducing distribution load flow algorithm’. In the second stage, Differential Evolution (DE) technique is used to determine the optimal location and size of the capacitors. The above method is tested on IEEE 69 bus system. In this paper a new method is proposed to improve the power factor of those buses having low power factor (less than 0.8lag) to unity power factor simultaneously by placing the capacitors.

Differential Evolution Based Optimization Approach for Power Factor Correction

IDES Editor

Research Inventy provides an outlet for research findings and reviews in areas of Engineering, Computer Science found to be relevant for national and international development, Research Inventy is an open access, peer reviewed international journal with a primary objective to provide research and applications related to Engineering. In its publications, to stimulate new research ideas and foster practical application from the research findings. The journal publishes original research of such high quality as to attract contributions from the relevant local and international communities.

Optimal Siting And Sizing Of Distributed Generation For Radial Distribution S...

inventy

OPTIMAL PLACEMENT AND SIZING OF CAPACITOR BANKS BASED ON VOLTAGE PROFILE AND ...

Prashanta Sarkar

This paper presents analysis of voltage stability index by a simple and efficient load flow method to find out the magnitude of voltage at each node in radial distribution system in that network. It shows the value of voltage stability index at each node in radial distribution network and predicts which node is more sensitive to voltage collapse. This paper also presents the effect on voltage stability index with variation in active power, reactive power, active and reactive power both. The voltage and VSI and effect of load variation on VSI for 33-node system & 28-node system are calculated in this paper with results shown

Calculating Voltage Instability Using Index Analysis in Radial Distribution ...

IJMER

Viewers also liked (7)

Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)

Performance Comparison Between the Original Forms of Biogeography-Based Optim...

Determination of the Weakest Branch in a Radial Distribution System using Rea...

Differential Evolution Based Optimization Approach for Power Factor Correction

Optimal Siting And Sizing Of Distributed Generation For Radial Distribution S...

OPTIMAL PLACEMENT AND SIZING OF CAPACITOR BANKS BASED ON VOLTAGE PROFILE AND ...

Calculating Voltage Instability Using Index Analysis in Radial Distribution ...

Olv1 (short circuit analysis)2

1. One-Line Diagram - OLV1 (Short-Circuit Analysis) page 1 09:45:15 Jun 23, 2013 Project File: SC Switchgear 11kV Pabrik-2 11 kV 0% 0 30,05 kA -87,4 MCC-10 0,525 kV 15,71% -18,3SWGR-11 6,9 kV 8,81% -31,7 SWGR-9 6,9 kV 11,35% -30,7 SWGR-8 6,9 kV 10,79% -30,7SWGR-5 6,9 kV 14,13% -36,8MCC-3 0,525 kV 10,42% -20,1 MCC-4 0,525 kV 13,55% -20,4 MCC-7 0,525 kV 5,72% -21 MCC-6 0,4 kV 2,82% -20,8 Sistem Integrasi LINE 4 2010 U 30,4 MW 12,39 UREA STORAGE 114 kVA 0,698 0,698 TR-6 1 MVA Cable6 SEAWATER INTAKE MCC7 180 kVA 0,818 0,818 TR-7 0,75 MVA Cable7 UREA PLANT 525V 925 kVA 3,86 3,86 TR-4 1,5 MVA Cable4 AMMONIA PLANT 525V 725 kVA 2,97 2,97 TR-3 1,5 MVA Cable3 UREA PLANT 6,9kV 800 kVA 0,352 0,352 TR-5 1,5 MVA Cable5 SEAWATER INTAKE MCC8 1942 kVA 0,885 0,885 TR-8 5 MVA Cable8 SEAWATER INTAKE MCC9 2055 kVA 0,931 0,931 TR-9 5 MVA Cable9 OFFSITE SWGR 6,6kV 1523 kVA 0,71 0,71 TR-11 5 MVA Cable11 OFFSITE SWGR 525V 1094 kVA 4,46 4,46 TR-10 1,5 MVA Cable10 101-JAM 6705 HP 1,9 Cable12 K2-TR-01 35 MVA AMMONIA PLANT 525V 725 kVA UREA PLANT 525V 925 kVA UREA PLANT 6,9kV 800 kVA UREA STORAGE 114 kVA SEAWATER INTAKE MCC7 180 kVA SEAWATER INTAKE MCC8 1942 kVA SEAWATER INTAKE MCC9 2055 kVA OFFSITE SWGR 525V 1094 kVA OFFSITE SWGR 6,6kV 1523 kVA Sistem Integrasi 13,41 2010 U 30,4 MW Cable3 Cable4 Cable5 Cable6 Cable7 Cable8 Cable9 Cable10 Cable11 Cable12 LINE 4 TR-3 1,5 MVA TR-4 1,5 MVA TR-5 1,5 MVA TR-6 1 MVA TR-7 0,75 MVA TR-8 5 MVA TR-9 5 MVA TR-10 1,5 MVA TR-11 5 MVA K2-TR-01 35 MVA Switchgear 11kV Pabrik-2 11 kV MCC-3 0,525 kV MCC-4 0,525 kV SWGR-5 6,9 kV MCC-6 0,4 kV MCC-7 0,525 kV SWGR-8 6,9 kV SWGR-9 6,9 kV MCC-10 0,525 kV SWGR-11 6,9 kV 101-JAM 6705 HP 0,142 0,184 0,22 0,025 0,039 0,555 0,584 0,213 0,445 1,9 8,81% -31,7 15,71% -18,3 11,35% -30,7 10,79% -30,7 5,72% -212,82% -20,8 14,13% -36,8 13,55% -20,4 10,42% -20,1 0% 0 30,05 kA -87,4 12,39 0,025 0,0390,1840,142 0,22 0,555 0,584 0,4450,213 1,9 2,97 3,86 0,352 0,698 0,818 0,885 0,931 4,46 0,71 2,97 3,86 0,698 0,818 0,885 0,931 4,46 0,71 0,352 1,9 13,41

Olv1 (short circuit analysis)2

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (7)

Olv1 (short circuit analysis)2