Due Date:
Mar 02, 2019 23:59:59
Max Points:
160
Details:
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.
An important role of nursing is to provide health promotion and disease prevention. Review the 2020 Topics and Objectives on the Healthy People website. Choose a topic of interest that you would like to address, in conjunction with a population at-risk for the associated topic. Submit the topic and associated group to your instructor for approval.
Create a 3 slide PowerPoint presentation for your topic and focus group. Include speaker notes and citations for each slide, and create a slide at the end for References.
Address the following:
Identify interdisciplinary health professionals important to include in the health promotion. What is their role? Why is their involvement significant?
Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and public health content.
Refer to the resource, "Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations," located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
CLC – Health Promotion and Community Resource Teaching Project
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%3
Satisfactory
79.00%4
Good
89.00%5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
10.0 %Approved Topic, Associated Population and Health Disparity
Topic and associated population selected is not approved; topic and associated population are not relevant to the scope of the assignment. Topic and associated population are omitted.Approved topic and associated population are partially presented. It is unclear how the topic adversely affects the selected population. Health disparities are partially described, or are not relevant to selected population. There are significant inaccuracies.Approved topic and associated population are summarized. A general correlation of how the topic adversely affects the selected population is presented. Relevant health disparities are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. More evidence or rationale is needed for support.Approved topic and associated population are described. A correlation of how the topic adversely affects the selected population is established and discussed. Relevant health disparities are discussed. There are minor inaccuracies. So ...
1. Due Date:
Mar 02, 2019 23:59:59
Max Points:
160
Details:
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.
An important role of nursing is to provide health promotion and
disease prevention. Review the 2020 Topics and Objectives on
the Healthy People website. Choose a topic of interest that you
would like to address, in conjunction with a population at-risk
for the associated topic. Submit the topic and associated group
to your instructor for approval.
Create a 3 slide PowerPoint presentation for your topic and
focus group. Include speaker notes and citations for each slide,
and create a slide at the end for References.
Address the following:
Identify interdisciplinary health professionals important to
include in the health promotion. What is their role? Why is their
involvement significant?
Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to
complete this assignment. Sources should be published within
the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and
public health content.
2. Refer to the resource, "Creating Effective PowerPoint
Presentations," located in the Student Success Center, for
additional guidance on completing this assignment in the
appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment,
solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of
sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines,
which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
CLC – Health Promotion and Community Resource Teaching
Project
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%3
Satisfactory
3. 79.00%4
Good
89.00%5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
10.0 %Approved Topic, Associated Population and Health
Disparity
Topic and associated population selected is not approved; topic
and associated population are not relevant to the scope of the
assignment. Topic and associated population are
omitted.Approved topic and associated population are partially
presented. It is unclear how the topic adversely affects the
selected population. Health disparities are partially described,
or are not relevant to selected population. There are significant
inaccuracies.Approved topic and associated population are
summarized. A general correlation of how the topic adversely
affects the selected population is presented. Relevant health
disparities are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. More
evidence or rationale is needed for support.Approved topic and
associated population are described. A correlation of how the
topic adversely affects the selected population is established
and discussed. Relevant health disparities are discussed. There
are minor inaccuracies. Some evidence or rationale is needed
for support.Approved topic and associated population are
thoroughly described. A strong correlation of how the topic
adversely affects the selected population is established and
discussed in detail. Relevant health disparities are clearly
presented and discussed. Strong evidence and compelling
rationale is offered for support.
10.0 %Evidence-Based Approaches to Optimize Health for
4. Population
Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this
population are not presented.Evidence-based approaches to
optimize health for this population are partially presented; some
approaches presented are not evidence-based, or are not relevant
for this population. Explanation of how these approaches
minimize health disparity is incomplete, or are not relevant for
the affected population. There are significant
inaccuracies.Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for
this population are summarized; it is unclear how some
approaches presented are relevant for this population. A general
explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity
is presented. There are some inaccuracies. More evidence or
rationale is needed for support.Evidence-based approaches to
optimize health for this population are discussed. Explanation
of how these approaches minimize health disparity is presented.
Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.Evidence-
based approaches to optimize health for this population are
discussed, and approaches are accurately represented and highly
relevant to the population. Explanation of how these approaches
minimize health disparity is well-developed. Strong evidence
and rationale are provided throughout. An understanding of the
importance of evidence-based approaches in the optimization of
health for an at-risk population is demonstrated.
10.0 %Proposal for Health Education for Family-Centered
Health Promotion
A proposal for health education for a family-centered health
promotion to address the issue for the target population is
omitted. The proposal is not supported by evidence-based
practice.A proposal for health education for a family-centered
health promotion to address the issue for the target population
is partially presented. The proposal is not entirely relevant to
the target population. The proposal requires more support
relevant to evidence-based practice. There are significant
inaccuracies.A proposal for health education for a family-
centered health promotion to address the issue for the target
5. population is presented. It is generally supported by evidence-
based practice; there are some inaccuracies, or some areas need
more support using evidence-based practice. Overall, the
proposal is relevant to the target population. A proposal for
health education for a family-centered health promotion to
address the issue for the target population is presented. It is
supported by evidence-based practice and relevant to the target
population. There are minor inaccuracies.A well-developed
proposal for health education for a family-centered health
promotion to address the issue for the target population is
presented. It is strongly supported by evidence-based practice
and highly relevant to the target population. The ability to apply
evidence-based practice to health education for a target
population is clearly demonstrated.
5.0 %Resources and Organizations for Proposed Education Plan
Resources and organizations to support the proposed education
plan are omitted.One health-related organization for the
selected topic is presented. The profile is incomplete, or it is
unclear how the organization is relevant to the focus topic. Two
resources (national or local) are presented. It is unclear how the
resources are supposed to be used, or how the resources are
relevant to the focus topic.A general profile for a health-related
organization relevant to the selected topic is summarized. Two
relevant resources (national or local) are presented, and there is
a general explanation for how the resources are supposed to be
used by the patient or provider.A general profile for a health-
related organization relevant to the selected topic is presented.
Two relevant resources (national or local) are presented, and
there is an explanation for how the resources are supposed to be
used by the patient or provider. A general profile for a health-
related organization relevant to the selected topic is well
presented. Two relevant resources (national or local) are
presented, and there is a clear explanation for how the resources
are supposed to be used by the patient or provider.
5.0 %Interdisciplinary Health Professional Involvement
Interdisciplinary health professionals important to the health
6. promotion are not included.At least one significant
interdisciplinary health professional is presented. It is unclear
how the professional important to the health promotion, and
what the role of the professional would be. Support for the
suggested member is needed.Some significant interdisciplinary
health professionals are presented. A summary of their role and
importance to the health promotion is provided. Some support
for the suggested members is needed.Key interdisciplinary
health professionals are presented A discussion of their role and
importance to the health promotion is provided. All significant
interdisciplinary health professionals are presented. A clear
discussion of their role and importance to the health promotion
is provided.
40.0 %Presentation of Content
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of
information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing
of ideas is unclear.The content is vague in conveying a point of
view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes
some persuasive information.The presentation slides are
generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in
organization or in their relationships to each other.The content
is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting
information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness.
Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.The
content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally
progress and relate to each other. The project includes
motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project
gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
5.0 %Layout
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing,
headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text
is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small
point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor
use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting
is evident.The layout shows some structure, but appears
cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space
7. or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due
to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations
of text.The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space
appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few
places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or
busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The
layout background and text complement each other and enable
the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and
point size varies appropriately for headings and text.The layout
is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with
appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text
is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point.
The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence
construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use
are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of
primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of
speech or uses them inappropriately.Some distracting
inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are
present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using
figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the
targeted audience for the most part.The writer is clearly aware
of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the
targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate
clearly.The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions,
figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative
ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning.Frequent and repetitive mechanical
errors distract the reader.Some mechanical errors or typos are
present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.Slides
are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be
8. present.Writer is clearly in control of standard, written,
academic English.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and
style)
Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is
inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style,
with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting
errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to
assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are
completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to
assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
