Here is the tabulated vote per issue (of individual justices of the Supreme Court). Unfortunately, they used the "wrong mathematics" in consolidating their various opinions. That's why they are having a hard time writing the Majority Decision, since it's not actually a majority vote (per issue).

1. The Wrong Mathematics
Used in Consolidating the Opinions
of the Supreme Court Justices
9 – 6 Decision is not representative of their actual
voting preferences on varied controversial issues

3. Issues on COMELEC DECISION
Issues on FILIPINO CITIZENSHIP
Issues on PHILIPPINE RESIDENCY
- Comelec can NOT disqualify a Candidate?
- Mrs. Llamanzares did NOT misrepresent herself?
- Bloodline is NOT really needed?
- Should eventual decision apply to ALL foundlings?
- Thoughts in Con-Con is equal to written Constitution?
- Inability to return to US established >10 years ago?
- Oath of Allegiance (to Ph) is equal to Renunciation (of US)?
- Notarized Public Document of COC is not factual?

4. WRONG MATHEMATICS WAS APPLIED
They should not have tallied per Justice per Major Issue
on how many Yes or No
A final vote of Yes should be a “unanimous” Yes
per Justice per Major Issue
NOT EVEN ARITHMETIC SHOULD HAVE BEEN APPLIED
A single vote of No should be tallied as No
per Justice per Major Issue (and not Yes)

6. VOTING PER SPECIFIC MINOR ISSUE
Or they should have tallied per issue
on how many Justices are Yes or No
and then the Majority Vote
had the last say