5. Energy Efficiency
On-Site Renewables
Demand Response
Green Power
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Indoor Water Use
Outdoor Water Use
Reclaimed Water Use
Stormwater Quantity
Stormwater Quality
Human Health
Productivity
Wellness
Physical Activity
Indoor Air Quality
Satisfaction
Joy
Stress
Society
Opportunity
Equity
Accessibility
Biodiversity
Ecosystem Services
Restoration
Heat Island
Dark Sky
LEED
CFCs
Acidification
Toxic Exposure
VMT
Biophilia
6.
7. An integrative platform to
understand the green dimensions
of buildings around the world.
GBIG provides:
• Project transparency
• Market context
• Integrated timelines
• Analytic insights
GBIG.ORG
14. Repository of
commute
distributions for
each building
Archival,
anonymized,
aggregated records
from cell towers.
Infer mobility
patterns
Other spatial data
(land vs. water,
highway location,
zoning etc.)
Infer commute
patterns for each
building
LEED building
location data
17. 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Average Commute (km)
Pleasanton East PA
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Share Walk/Bikeable
Pleasanton East PA
East Palo Alto has 28% higher impact per
commuter than Pleasanton.
Only 7% of East PA workers are even in
range for walking/biking, limiting scope of
impact for this alternative vanpool?
18. 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Average Commute (km)
West Berkeley Cupertino
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Share walk/bikeable Long Distance (20mi+)
Extremely High/Low
Commutes
West Berkeley Cupertino
Cupertino is ~40% higher impact than West
Berkeley.
Cupertino has two distinct groups—very short
and very long distance commuters whereas
W. Berkeley is highly concentrated mid-
distance.
19. Aggregated, Anonymous Cell Data
Replaces some, not all, survey data
New Capabilities
Comparative location benchmarking +
before-after evaluation
Challenge
New ways to recognize “green” locations and
behaviors for different types of buildings in different
circumstances
Conclusions
