SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 135
Investigating and Prosecuting
Homicide by a Prescribing Doctor
Presenters:
•Peter Kougasian, JD, Counsel to the Special Narcotics
Prosecutor, City of New York
•Ryan Sakacs, JD, Chief, Prescription Drug Investigation Unit,
Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor, City of New York
•John Niedermann, JD, Deputy District Attorney, Los Angeles
County District Attorney’s Office
Law Enforcement Track
Moderator: Jackie L. Steele, Jr., JD, Commonwealth Attorney,
Kentucky 27th Judicial Circuit, and Vice Chairman, Operation
UNITE Board of Directors
Disclosures
Peter Kougasian, JD; John Niedermann, JD; Ryan
Sakacs, JD; and Jackie L. Steele, Jr., JD, have disclosed
no relevant, real, or apparent personal or
professional financial relationships with proprietary
entities that produce healthcare goods and services.
Disclosures
• All planners/managers hereby state that they or
their spouse/life partner do not have any
financial relationships or relationships to
products or devices with any commercial interest
related to the content of this activity of any
amount during the past 12 months.
• The following planners/managers have the
following to disclose:
– John J. Dreyzehner, MD, MPH, FACOEM – Ownership
interest: Starfish Health (spouse)
– Robert DuPont – Employment: Bensinger, DuPont &
Associates-Prescription Drug Research Center
Learning Objectives
1. Describe two criminal cases that resulted in
convictions against prescribing doctors in the
deaths of their patients.
2. Identify challenges and solutions to
investigating homicide by a prescribing
doctor.
3. Explain how to prepare for and prosecute a
criminal trial against a prescribing doctor.
Investigating and Prosecuting Homicide by aInvestigating and Prosecuting Homicide by a
Prescribing PhysicianPrescribing Physician
Part One: New YorkPart One: New York
ADA Ryan Sakacs & ADA Peter Kougasian
Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor
for the City of New York
Disclosure statement
• Assistant District Attorneys Ryan Sakacs and Peter Kougasian have disclosed no relevant, real or
apparent personal or professional financial relationships with proprietary entities that produce health
care goods or services.
Learning objectives
• Describe two criminal cases that resulted in
convictions against prescribing doctors in the
deaths of their patients.
• Identify challenges and solutions to
investigating homicide by a prescribing
doctor.
• Explain how to prepare for and prosecute a
criminal trial against a prescribing doctor.
“Doctor is prescribing medication to people who don’t need it”
- Complaint Received by the NYPD on October 19, 2010
First Investigative Step: Analyzing the Prescription Data
*Decrease in prescriptions after April
2011 reflect incomplete May 2011 data
How Did Prescription Activity Change Over Time?
When Were The Prescriptions Written ?
How Many Prescriptions Were Being Written Per Day?
Who Received These Prescriptions?
*Based on
prescription records
from January 1, 2009 -
June 18, 2011.
Distance Between Reported Patient Residences & Pain Management Clinic
Corroborating the Data
Dr. Stan Xuhui Li
• DOB: 02/10/54
• Born in China, Naturalized Citizen
• Attended Medical Schools in China and the US
• Licensed to Practice Medicine in NY since
1999
• Licensed by the DEA to Prescribe Controlled
Substances
• Full time Anesthesiologist at Robert Wood
Johnson University Hospital in Hamilton, NJ
• Board Certified in Anesthesiology
• Board Certified in Pain Medicine
• Prescriptions issued in New York State,
from a location in Flushing, Queens
Surveillance: Outside the Doctor’s Preferred Pharmacy
April 30, 2011
• Was the OSNP the proper agency to take action?
– DEA
– OPMC
• Could we charge a physician for writing
prescriptions within the context of a medical
practice?
• Would the case be based on undercover buys or
past prescriptions?
• Could we hold the doctor accountable for the
deaths or endangerment of any of his patients?
Considering Criminal Charges
June 19, 2011: Medford Killings
o Over 15,000 Prescription Records Analyzed
o Extensive Surveillance Conducted
o Two Confidential Informants Utilized
o Over 100 Witnesses Interviewed
o Multiple Bank Accounts Identified & Reviewed
o Three Search Warrants Executed
o Sixteen Fatal Overdoses Identified from 2009 to 2011
o 1,200 Patient Charts Reviewed
o Dozens of Patient Chart Submitted for Expert Medical Review
o Hundreds of Medicare and Private Insurance Claims Audited
o 76 Witnesses Called Before a 6-Month Special Grand Jury
Investigative Steps
Identifying
Witnesses and
Decedents
Shutting Down
The Clinic
“I have been in recent contact
with Jimmy’s primary
doctor…He has no
knowledge of your
prescriptions…”
“I am puzzled why you have
never contacted Jimmy’s primary
care physician when prescribing
such serious pills and
medications that could
ultimately lead to death when
misused or mixed with other
medications that Jimmy has been
taking.”
“This type of negligence and
abuse by your office will be
made known to the proper
authorities…”
Letter to Doctor from
Patient’s Concerned
Father
September 4, 2009
Prescribing Practices That Jeopardized
Health & Public Safety
• Prescribing multiple forms of opioids to the same
patient on the same day
(i.e. Percocet, OxyContin, Hydrocodone and Fentanyl)
• Frequently increasing dosage and quantity of pills
prescribed
• Prescribing dangerous combinations of drugs
• Excessive, long-term opioid prescribing
• Patients steered to preferred pharmacy
• Patients reporting conditions such as carpal tunnel
and ovarian cysts to obtain Oxycodone
• Countless patients with prior convictions for
narcotics-related crimes or DWI
Focusing on the Doctor’s Criminal Conduct
• Fees tied to quantities and dosages of Schedule II
substances
• Disregarding clear evidence of addiction, abuse,
morbidity and mortality
• Patients forced to pay cash for visits and procedures
in addition to fees billed to Medicare and private
insurance
• False claims to gov’t and private health insurance
• Altered patient files
Fee
Schedule
Medical Expert Review
Key issues:
Foreseeability: What was the likelihood that the prescription
would lead to tragedy?
Good faith: Was the doctor genuinely trying to treat illness, or
simply selling a prescription?
Causation: Is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that drugs
prescribed by the doctor, as opposed to illicit drugs or drugs
prescribed by other physicians, was a direct cause of death?
Physician Liability for Patient Overdose
07/13/09
Dr. Li: 90 Oxycodone pills (30mg)
08/03/10
Substance Abuse Clinic: Suboxone
08/08/10
Dr. Li: 60 Alprazolam tablets (2 mg)
Dr. Li: 120 Oxycodone pills (30mg)
08/11/10
Substance Abuse Clinic: Suboxone
08/14/10
Dr. Li: 90 Alprazolam tablets (1 mg)
Dr. Li: 120 Percocet pills (10/325 mg)
08/18/10
Substance Abuse Clinic: Suboxone
08/24/10
Substance Abuse Clinic: Suboxone
09/11/10
Dr. Li: 90 Alprazolam tablets (2 mg)
Dr. Li: 120 Oxycodone pills (30mg)
09/14/10
Nicholas Rappold found dead
Nicholas Rappold
January 6, 1989 – September 14, 2010
9/13/10:OXY PILLS PURCHASED ON STREET
Li’s Prescriptions
Were a Proximate
Cause of Death
• Manslaughter in the Second Degree (2 counts)
• Reckless Endangerment in the First Degree (3 counts)
• Reckless Endangerment in the Second Degree (4 counts)
• Criminal Sale of a Prescription for a Controlled Substance (180
counts)
• Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree (1 count)
• Grand Larceny in the Third Degree (2 counts)
• Offering a False Instrument for Filing in the First Degree (8
counts)
• Falsification of Business Records in the First Degree (16 counts,
reduced to 11 following motion practice)
Charges
The Trial
Part 2 - Trial
The subjective mental element
• Penal Law Section 220.65 (Criminal Sale of a
Prescription for a Controlled Substance):
– “…a person sells a prescription for a controlled
substance unlawfully when he does so other than
in good faith in the course of his professional
practice.” (emphasis added)
Manslaughter in the Second Degree
• “A person is guilty of manslaughter in the second
degree when…he recklessly causes the death of
another person.” (NY Penal Law Section
125.15[1])
• “A person acts recklessly…when he is aware of
and consciously disregards a substantial and
unjustifiable risk that such result will occur…The
risk must be of such a nature and degree that
disregard thereof constitutes a gross deviation
from the standard of conduct that a reasonable
person would observe…” (emphasis added)
Evidentiary issues –
Motions in limine
• How much context would Court allow into
evidence?
– Statistics regarding
• Numbers of patients seen in one day
• Numbers of prescriptions written in one day
• Distances traveled by patients
– Financial data
• Cash deposits to bank accounts in New Jersey
– Surveillance of crowds waiting for doctor to arrive
– Descriptions of conditions in waiting room
Sheer number of patients seen per day
strongly suggested a “pill mill”
Surveillance recorded patients loitering
Outside of Doctor’s Office - June 25, 2011
Theme of Defense
Defendant was a conscientious doctor who
brought board-certified pain management to
an underserved neighborhood
Theme of defense: Defendant was a conscientious
doctor who provided high quality care
• Defense expert: board certified in
anesthesiology and pain management and a
founding member of the New York Pain
Society.
• Testified with respect to every charged
prescription that it was consistent with
effective and conscientious medical practice.
Countering the theme of the defense
• People’s expert: Board certified in
anesthesiology and pain management,
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology,
Medical Director of Pain Management.
• Testified that patient records lacked a “work-
up,” and often lacked any imaging or records
from or referral letters from other doctors.
• No demonstration that defendant was
actually practicing medicine.
Countering defense theme
(“Defendant provided high-quality
medical care…”)
(Patient had recently had gastric bypass and
large weight loss)
Countering defense theme, cont’d.
• Doctor added fictitious vital signs to records
before submitting to OPMC
Countering defense theme, cont’d.
Fictitious vital signs:
“Narcotic agreements” were window-
dressing
Defense arguments at trial
• Patients lied to the doctor (e.g. claimed to be
in serious pain) and doctor believed them
• Doctor often began patients with dosages
lower than they reported on intake, and
sometimes suggested tapering schedules
• Patients took drugs other than as directed
and were multi-sourcing
• Other doctors prescribed in equal or greater
doses to these patients
Meeting the Defenses
“The patients lied…”
Counterargument: While patients did indeed
lie to the defendant, it is clear that the
defendant knew they were lying, or was at
least profoundly indifferent.
Alterations refute defense that doctor
was deceived by patients
Alterations refute defense that doctor
was deceived by the patient
Meeting the defenses
“The patients were multi-sourcing…”
The evidence demonstrated that defendant
was aware of the multi-sourcing, and yet
continued to prescribe.
Defendant prescribed in the face of
outrageous muti-sourcing
Meeting the defenses
“The doctor used tapering schedules”
Counterargument: the Doctor routinely
ignored his own tapering schedules
Tapering schedules were ignored
March 1, 2008 intake form: Excerpt from medical record, 2009:
Meeting the defenses
“the doctor often began the patients with dosages
lower than what they had been receiving before they
came to see him”
Defense: “but often the doctor began by
lowering the dosage…”
Counterargument: where there is no physical
examination, only a cursory patient
interview, and no attempt to diagnose the
genesis of the pain, there is no practice of
medicine, even if the prescription is for
slightly lower dosages than the patient
claimed to be receiving.
Verdict
• Defendant convicted on 198 out of 211
counts:
– 2 counts of Manslaughter in the Second Degree
– 3 counts of Reckless Endangerment in the First
Degree
– 3 counts of Reckless Endangerment in the Second
Degree
– 170 counts of Criminal Sale of a Prescription for a
Controlled Substance
Verdict, cont’d…
– 1 count of Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree
– 2 counts of Grand Larceny in the Third Degree
– 9 counts of Falsifying Business Records in the First
Degree
– 8 counts of Offering a False Document for Filing
Newsday, July 19, 2014
• “Substance abuse experts praised the
verdicts. ‘I hope this sends a message to
other physicians,’ said Dr. Jeffrey Reynolds of
the Family and Children’s Association in
Mineola. ‘…Long Island is wrestling with a
profound prescription drug crisis, which is
fueled in large part by a small number of
overprescribing doctors.’”
PROSECUTING A DOCTORPROSECUTING A DOCTOR
FOR MURDERFOR MURDER
SEPTEMBER 2007 TO MAY 2010 (LESS THAN 3 YEARS)SEPTEMBER 2007 TO MAY 2010 (LESS THAN 3 YEARS)
PC 187
PC 187
PC 187
PC 187
PC 187
PC 187
FELONY MURDER
+The unlawful killing of a human being,
+Whether intentional, unintentional, or
accidental,
+Which occurs during the commission
or attempted commission of felony,
+When the perpetrator had the specific
intent to commit that specified felony
= MURDER
FELONY MURDER
+The unlawful killing of a human being,
+Whether intentional, unintentional, or
accidental,
+Which occurs during the commission
or attempted commission of felony,
+When the perpetrator had the specific
intent to commit that specified felony
= MURDER
CALIFORNIACALIFORNIA
OVER-PRESCRIBING STATUTESOVER-PRESCRIBING STATUTES
INTENTINTENT
EXPRESSMALICE
IMPLIEDMALICE
IINTENDTOKILLSOMEONE
IINTENDTODOSOMETHING
THATIKNOW
CANKILLSOMEONE
ANDIDON’TCARE
MURDERMURDER MURDERMURDER
-------------------------
-------------------------
SECOND DEGREE MURDER
DANGEROUS TO LIFE
1. The killing resulted from an intentional act,
2. The natural consequences of the act are
dangerous to human life, and
3. The act was deliberately performed with
knowledge of the danger to, and with conscious
disregard for, human life.
• When the killing is the direct result of such an act, it is notWhen the killing is the direct result of such an act, it is not
necessary to prove that the defendant intended that thenecessary to prove that the defendant intended that the
act would result in the death of a human being.act would result in the death of a human being.
DR. WALTER STRAUSERDR. WALTER STRAUSER
THE STANDARD OF CARETHE STANDARD OF CARE
“THE LEVEL OF SKILL, KNOWLEDGE AND
CARE IN DIAGNOSING AND TREATING
THAT A REASONABLY PRUDENT
PHYSICIAN WOULD EXERCISE IN SIMILAR
CIRCUMSTANCES.”
THE SAME STANDARD OF CARE APPLIES TO ALL
PHYSICIANS
AN EXTREME DEPARTURE FROM THE STANDARD OF
CARE:
GROSS NEGLIGENCE AND LACK OF SCANT CARE
THE UNDERCOVER OPERATIONS
SPECIAL AGENT STEPHANIE MORELANDSPECIAL AGENT STEPHANIE MORELAND APRIL 25, 2008APRIL 25, 2008
• TOLD DEFENDANT SHE NEEDED SOMETHING FOR CRAMPS
AND A HEADACHE
• TOLD THE DEFENDANT SHE WAS COMING FROM OCEANSIDE
• NO PHYSICAL EXAM WAS GIVEN
• DEFENDANT SAID SHE WOULD PRESCRIBE VICODIN TO TAKE
THE EDGES OFF
THE SEARCH WARRANTS
2010 2012
CONDITIONS INSIDE THE CLINIC
DR. TU’S OFFICE
DR. TSENG’S OFFICE
GLORIA RODRIGUEZGLORIA RODRIGUEZ
DEMOGRAPHIC OF PATIENTS CHANGED
OVER TIME:
•YOUNG KIDS 18 TO 25
•WHITE
•NOT FROM THE AREA
• A LOT CAME FROM ORANGE OR
RIVERSIDE COUNTIES
•TATTOOS
•SOMETIMES WERE ANXIOUS OR
AGITATED
WAIT TIME CHANGE FROM AN HOUR TO TWO OR
THREE HOURS
RECEPTIONISTRECEPTIONIST
GLORIA RODRIGUEZGLORIA RODRIGUEZ
CASH INCREASED FROMCASH INCREASED FROM
$500-$600 PER DAY$500-$600 PER DAY
TO $2,000 SOMETIMESTO $2,000 SOMETIMES
$3,000 PER DAY$3,000 PER DAY
““They’re druggies, theyThey’re druggies, they
can wait.”can wait.”
PER ADVANCED CAREPER ADVANCED CARE
AAA TAX RETURNSAAA TAX RETURNS
2007-20102007-2010
+ $5,000,000+ $5,000,000
SOME PATIENTS HAD BLANK
RECORDS IN 2010 THEN HAD
COMPLETED RECORDS IN 2012STEVEN OGLESTEVEN OGLE
2010 2012
SOME PATIENTS HAD NO TREATMENT
RECORDS AT ALL
CREATING A CAPTIVE AUDIENCECREATING A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE
MICHAEL COOK: WITHDRAWAL IS HELL. THE BODY GETS WEAKER
AND THE TOLERANCE GROWS. IT’S AN EQUATION FOR DISASTER.
JUSTIN SMITH: WOULD WAIT 2-3 HOURS EACH TIME BECAUSE HE
NEEDED TO GET HIS MEDICATION. WHEN YOU ARE ADDICTED, YOU
DON’T REALLY CARE WHAT YOU TAKE OR WHAT YOU DO. IF IT
MAKES YOU NORMAL OR HIGH, THEN IT WORKS. AND THERE IS A
RISK OF DYING ALMOST EVERY DAY.
LANA RAU: FELT LIKE SHE WAS GOING THROUGH WITHDRAWALS
EVERY MORNING AND NEEDED THE MEDICATION JUST TO FEEL
NORMAL.
ALEXANDER HUY: HE WOULD WAIT UP TO 6 HOURS JUST TO GET
HIS PRESCRIPTION.
20072007 20082008
20092009
20102010
STAVRONSTAVRON
DEATHDEATH
LATHAMLATHAM
DEATHDEATH
COOKCOOK
OVERDOSEOVERDOSE
KENNEYKENNEY
DEATHDEATH
NGUYENNGUYEN
DEATHDEATH
OGLEOGLE
DEATHDEATH
KATSNELSONKATSNELSON
DEATHDEATH
CHAMBERSCHAMBERS
DEATHDEATH
GOMEZGOMEZ
DEATHDEATH
HUGGARDHUGGARD
DEATHDEATHROVEROROVERO
DEATHDEATHBENDERBENDER
DEATHDEATHMATAMATA
DEATHDEATH
TIMELINETIMELINE APPRECIATIONAPPRECIATION
OF THE RISKOF THE RISK
DR. EZEKIEL FINKDR. EZEKIEL FINK
IMPACT OF NOTIFICATION OF AIMPACT OF NOTIFICATION OF A
PATIENT DEATH ON THE PRACTICEPATIENT DEATH ON THE PRACTICE
OF MEDICINEOF MEDICINE
““I THINK THAT A PATIENT DYING IN ONE’SI THINK THAT A PATIENT DYING IN ONE’S
CARE WOULD HAVE A PROFOUNDCARE WOULD HAVE A PROFOUND
IMPACT AND WOULD MAKE ME GO BACKIMPACT AND WOULD MAKE ME GO BACK
AND TRY TO FIGURE OUT IF THERE WASAND TRY TO FIGURE OUT IF THERE WAS
SOMETHING THAT COULD HAVE BEENSOMETHING THAT COULD HAVE BEEN
DONE DIFFERENT TO PREVENT THATDONE DIFFERENT TO PREVENT THAT
DEATH.”DEATH.”
““DIDN’T CREATE AN ISSUE IN THE OFFICE. WASDIDN’T CREATE AN ISSUE IN THE OFFICE. WAS
AN ORDINARY CALL, MOSTLY FYI.”AN ORDINARY CALL, MOSTLY FYI.”
Dr. Gene Tu
MATTHEW STAVRONMATTHEW STAVRON
BRUCE STAVRON:
•DRUG USE BEGAN AT 15 YEARS OLD
•WAS UNDER THE INFLUENCE 30-40% OF
THE TIME
•COULDN’T SEND HIM TO REHAB
BECAUSE IT HE DIDN’T HAVE THE
RESOURCES
•PRIOR TO HIS DEATH, MATTHEW WAS
IN THE BEST HEALTH BRUCE HAD SEEN
HIM
MATTHEW STAVRONMATTHEW STAVRON
EXTREME DEPARTUREEXTREME DEPARTURE
FROM THE STANDARD OF CAREFROM THE STANDARD OF CARE
IN EVALUATING PRIOR TOIN EVALUATING PRIOR TO
PRESCRIBING CONTROLLEDPRESCRIBING CONTROLLED
SUBSTANCESSUBSTANCES STRAUSERSTRAUSER
2 DAYS
2 DAYS
SEPTEMBER 16, 2007SEPTEMBER 16, 2007
MATTHEW STAVRONMATTHEW STAVRON
VICTORIA REICHARTVICTORIA REICHART::
She had concerns of drug seeking.She had concerns of drug seeking.
Said Stavron had an injury but did not knowSaid Stavron had an injury but did not know
the source of the injury.the source of the injury.
DECEASED
DECEASED
DECEASED
DECEASED
MATTHEW STAVRONMATTHEW STAVRON
ANDERSONANDERSON
CAUSE OF DEATH: OXYCODONE WAS TOXICCAUSE OF DEATH: OXYCODONE WAS TOXIC
RYAN LATHAMRYAN LATHAM
MARK LATHAM:
•HIS SON BEGAN TO USE VICODIN
AFTER HE BROKE HIS JAW IN JANUARY
2007
•HIS PERSONALITY CHANGED AND HE
WAS LETHARGIC AND LISTLESS
•LIFE TOOK AN UPSWING AND HE WENT
BACK TO COLLEGE
•PRIOR TO HIS DEATH, HE’D BEEN IN A
FIGHT DEFENDING HIS FRIEND
RYAN LATHAMRYAN LATHAM
6 DAYS
6 DAYS
MARCH 25, 2008MARCH 25, 2008
RYAN LATHAMRYAN LATHAM
KELLY RALPHKELLY RALPH::
Had back pain with unknown source but appearedHad back pain with unknown source but appeared
to be a sports injury.to be a sports injury.
Thought 5 hydrocodone per day was safe.Thought 5 hydrocodone per day was safe.
DECEASED
DECEASED
DECEASED
DECEASED
RYAN LATHAMRYAN LATHAM
ANDERSONANDERSON
CAUSE OF DEATH: HYDROCODONE WAS A TOXIC LEVELCAUSE OF DEATH: HYDROCODONE WAS A TOXIC LEVEL
MICHAEL COOKMICHAEL COOK
It never took long in the exam room and no
physical exam was done. Started adding
prescriptions to what I wanted. Overdosed 3
times in 2 days, the last time
in the restroom at AAA.
MICHAEL COOKMICHAEL COOK
Went to clinic on April 25, 2008.
Patient’s screen was positive
for opiates. Doctor said he’d taken
6 Opana yesterday.
MATTHEW BRIONESMATTHEW BRIONES
NAYTHAN KENNEYNAYTHAN KENNEY
ERIN WHITNEY:
•DOCTOR’S RECEPTION AREA LOOKED
LIKE A PAROLE OFFICE
• PEOPLE IN THERE HAD LOTS OF
TATTOOS
• DRUG DEALING AND PEOPLE
EXCHANGING NUMBERS
• 2 TO 3 PEOPLE IN EACH EXAM ROOM
•SHE RECEIVED PRESCRIPTIONS FROM THE
DEFENDANT WITH NO EXAM, NO X-RAYS
NAYTHAN KENNEYNAYTHAN KENNEY
4 DAYS
4 DAYS
SEPTEMBER 16, 2008SEPTEMBER 16, 2008
NAYTHAN KENNEYNAYTHAN KENNEY
STRAUSERSTRAUSER
No medical record except date of
visit, blood pressure and pulse or no
examination of the patient while
giving controlled substances is an
Extreme Departure from the standard
of care. It falls outside the scope of
practice.
DECEASED
DECEASED
NAYTHAN KENNEYNAYTHAN KENNEY
ANDERSONANDERSON
CAUSE OF DEATH: OXYCODONECAUSE OF DEATH: OXYCODONE
AND METHADONEAND METHADONE
BOTH AT TOXIC LEVELSBOTH AT TOXIC LEVELS
OXYCODONE IN THE “HIGHER ECHELON” OF TOXICOXYCODONE IN THE “HIGHER ECHELON” OF TOXIC
COUNT 1COUNT 1
VU NGUYENVU NGUYEN
VIET NGUYEN:
•DID NOT KNOW OF ANY MEDICAL
CONDITIONS AS TO WHY HIS BROTHER
WOULD BE ON PAIN KILLERS
NISHA ANAYA:
•VU WAS NOT IN VISIBLE PAIN—HE WAS
YOUNG AND HE WORKED HARD
SAMANTHA NGUYEN:
•KNEW OF NO MEDICAL OR
PSYCHOLOGICAL REASONS FOR HIM TO
GET PRESCRIPTIONS
VU NGUYENVU NGUYEN
FEBRUARY 7, 2009FEBRUARY 7, 2009
VU NGUYENVU NGUYEN
DECEASED
DECEASED
21 DAYS
21 DAYS
DECEASED
DECEASED
VU NGUYENVU NGUYEN
STRAUSERSTRAUSER
REFILLED HIS MEDICATION EARLY
CHANGE HIS NORCO TO OPANA WHICH IS
3 TIMES STRONGER
PRESCRIBED HIM TWO SHORT ACTING
OPIOIDS AT THE SAME TIME. THAT DOESN’T
MAKE PHARMACOLOGICAL OR CLINICAL
SENSE.
NOTICE TO THE DEFENDANT THAT HER PATIENTSNOTICE TO THE DEFENDANT THAT HER PATIENTS
ARE ABUSING THEIR MEDICATIONARE ABUSING THEIR MEDICATION
DECEASED
DECEASED
VU NGUYENVU NGUYEN
ANDERSONANDERSON
CAUSE OF DEATH: OXYMORPHONE, WITHCAUSE OF DEATH: OXYMORPHONE, WITH
METHADONEMETHADONE
AND ALPRAZOLAM AS CONTRIBUTORSAND ALPRAZOLAM AS CONTRIBUTORS
DECEASED
DECEASED
VU NGUYENVU NGUYEN
ERICA ARELLANO:
He was always seeking more medications and stronger
dosages. Never prescribed methadone but thought that
he was drug seeking with other physicians.
COUNT 2COUNT 2
STEVEN OGLESTEVEN OGLE
ELISSA OGLE:
•LIVED WITH HER BROTHER-IN-LAW IN PALM SPRINGS.
DROVE 1 HOUR AND 10 MINUTES ONE WAY TO SEE
THE DEFENDANT
•CONFRONTED STEVEN ABOUT HIS DRUG USE WHEN
HE APPEARED UNDER THE INFLUENCE
•HE SAID HE WAS GOING TO CONTINUE TO USE IT
BECAUSE IT WAS PRESCRIBED BY HIS DOCTOR
•ON THE LAST VISIT TO AAA, SAW SOMEONE LEAVE
THE RESTROOOM AND THERE WAS SMOKE AND A
DISCARDED SYRINGE IN THE TRASH
STEVEN OGLESTEVEN OGLE
APRIL 7, 2009APRIL 7, 2009
STEVEN OGLESTEVEN OGLE
2 DAYS
2 DAYS DECEASED
DECEASED
DECEASED
DECEASED
STEVEN OGLESTEVEN OGLE
FINKFINK
THE AMOUNT OF MEDICATION OGLE
CLAIMED TO BE TAKING WAS
OUTRAGEOUS.
WITH A PATIENT LIKE THIS, YOU HAVE TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE IN
THE RIGHT PLACE BECAUSE IT’S GOING TO BE THE LAST
APPOINTMENT THEY EVER HAVE WITH YOU IF YOU DON’T TREAT IT
WITH THE RIGHT SERIOUSNESS.
DECEASED
DECEASED
STEVEN OGLESTEVEN OGLE
ANDERSONANDERSON
CAUSE OF DEATH: METHADONE WAS A TOXIC LEVELCAUSE OF DEATH: METHADONE WAS A TOXIC LEVEL
COUNT 3COUNT 3
JOSEPH ROVEROJOSEPH ROVERO
JOSEPH ROVERO JR.:
•DID NOT KNOW OF ANY NEED FOR HIS SON TO TAKE
PRESCRIPTIONS FOR ANY PHYSICAL OR
PSYCHOLOGICAL NEED.
•SPOKE TO JOEY IN DECEMBER ON HIS WAY HOME
AND HE SAID HE WAS DOING SOME GUY A FAVOR.
ONLY TIME HE HEARD JOEY SLURRING HIS WORDS.
DAVID LOVE:
•WORKS FOR THE MARICOPA COUNTY MEDICAL
EXAMINER’S OFFICE.
•CONTACTED THE DEFENDANT FOR JOEY’S MEDICAL
RECORDS AND SHE INITIALLY REFUSED TO SEND HIM
MEDICAL RECORDS BECAUSE SHE HAD ONLY
TREATED HIM ONCE AND DIDN’T HAVE MANY
RECORDS.
THE ARIZONA CONNECTIONTHE ARIZONA CONNECTION
361 MILES
JOSEPH ROVEROJOSEPH ROVERO
DECEMBER 9, 2009DECEMBER 9, 2009
JOSEPH ROVEROJOSEPH ROVERO
DECEASED
DECEASED
DECEMBER 18, 2009DECEMBER 18, 2009
9 DAYS
9 DAYS
ANDERSONANDERSON
CAUSE OF DEATH: OXYCODONE IN A LEVEL FORCAUSE OF DEATH: OXYCODONE IN A LEVEL FOR
A NAÏVE USER THAT WOULD BE LETHAL IFA NAÏVE USER THAT WOULD BE LETHAL IF
COMBINED WITH ALCOHOL (.10 -- .13)COMBINED WITH ALCOHOL (.10 -- .13)
DECEASED
DECEASED
JOSEPH ROVEROJOSEPH ROVERO
DECEASED
DECEASED
JOSEPH ROVEROJOSEPH ROVERO
LANA RAULANA RAU
OCTOBER 5, 2009OCTOBER 5, 2009
LANA RAULANA RAU
Went to Dr. Tseng for pain medication.
Paid $110 for each visit. One payment
for her and one for Joseph.
Sometimes she would wait for Dr.
Tseng in the storage room when she
was in a hurry. Was coming in every 6
days and was taking up to 70 pills a
day. Dr. Tseng would write
prescriptions under Joseph’s name at
her request. He was not there with her
when she asked for this.
LANA RAULANA RAU
FINKFINK
Was taking twice the
amount of a toxic dose
of acetaminophen every
day.
Writing prescriptions for Lana
Rau under the name of Joseph
Rau is exceptionally bizarre
behavior. I just can’t wrap my
head around it. I have only seen
this in my career once, right now.
I’m never going to see this again.
LANA RAULANA RAU
20072007
20082008
20092009
SEPTEMBERSEPTEMBER
20082008
KENNEYKENNEY NGUYENNGUYEN
MARCHMARCH
20092009
5 ½ MONTHS5 ½ MONTHS 4 WEEKS4 WEEKS
OGLEOGLE
APRILAPRIL
20092009
KATSNELSONKATSNELSON
APRILAPRIL
20092009
8 DAYS8 DAYS
ROVEROROVERO
DECEMBERDECEMBER
20092009
8 MONTHS8 MONTHS
PATTERNPATTERN
APPRECIATION OF THE RISK/CONSCIOUS DISREGARDAPPRECIATION OF THE RISK/CONSCIOUS DISREGARD
Investigating and Prosecuting
Homicide by a Prescribing Doctor
Presenters:
•Peter Kougasian, JD, Counsel to the Special Narcotics
Prosecutor, City of New York
•Ryan Sakacs, JD, Chief, Prescription Drug Investigation Unit,
Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor, City of New York
•John Niedermann, JD, Deputy District Attorney, Los Angeles
County District Attorney’s Office
Law Enforcement Track
Moderator: Jackie L. Steele, Jr., JD, Commonwealth Attorney,
Kentucky 27th Judicial Circuit, and Vice Chairman, Operation
UNITE Board of Directors

More Related Content

What's hot

Rx16 heroin tues_330_1_moser_2proescholdbell-sachdeva
Rx16 heroin tues_330_1_moser_2proescholdbell-sachdevaRx16 heroin tues_330_1_moser_2proescholdbell-sachdeva
Rx16 heroin tues_330_1_moser_2proescholdbell-sachdevaOPUNITE
 
Rx16 len tues_200_1_beshear_2ohr-menendez
Rx16 len tues_200_1_beshear_2ohr-menendezRx16 len tues_200_1_beshear_2ohr-menendez
Rx16 len tues_200_1_beshear_2ohr-menendezOPUNITE
 
Rx16 pdmp tues_200_1_o_neill_2carter_3small_armagan
Rx16 pdmp tues_200_1_o_neill_2carter_3small_armaganRx16 pdmp tues_200_1_o_neill_2carter_3small_armagan
Rx16 pdmp tues_200_1_o_neill_2carter_3small_armaganOPUNITE
 
Rx16 adv wed_1230_1_thau_2gorman
Rx16 adv wed_1230_1_thau_2gormanRx16 adv wed_1230_1_thau_2gorman
Rx16 adv wed_1230_1_thau_2gormanOPUNITE
 
Rx16 tpp wed_200_group
Rx16 tpp wed_200_groupRx16 tpp wed_200_group
Rx16 tpp wed_200_groupOPUNITE
 
Web rx16 prev_tues_330_1_lawal_2warren_3huddleston_4pershing
Web rx16 prev_tues_330_1_lawal_2warren_3huddleston_4pershingWeb rx16 prev_tues_330_1_lawal_2warren_3huddleston_4pershing
Web rx16 prev_tues_330_1_lawal_2warren_3huddleston_4pershingOPUNITE
 
Web only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachio
Web only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachioWeb only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachio
Web only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachioOPUNITE
 
Rx16 workshop 200_group_ppt
Rx16 workshop 200_group_pptRx16 workshop 200_group_ppt
Rx16 workshop 200_group_pptOPUNITE
 
Rx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichting
Rx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichtingRx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichting
Rx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichtingOPUNITE
 
Rx16 tpp wed_111_panel_paduda_pew
Rx16 tpp wed_111_panel_paduda_pewRx16 tpp wed_111_panel_paduda_pew
Rx16 tpp wed_111_panel_paduda_pewOPUNITE
 
Rx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsen
Rx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsenRx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsen
Rx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsenOPUNITE
 
View only rx16 prev tues_1230_1_duwve_2adams_3proescholdbell-sachdeva
View only rx16 prev tues_1230_1_duwve_2adams_3proescholdbell-sachdevaView only rx16 prev tues_1230_1_duwve_2adams_3proescholdbell-sachdeva
View only rx16 prev tues_1230_1_duwve_2adams_3proescholdbell-sachdevaOPUNITE
 
Web only rx16 len wed_1230_1_daugherty_2baier-haas
Web only rx16 len wed_1230_1_daugherty_2baier-haasWeb only rx16 len wed_1230_1_daugherty_2baier-haas
Web only rx16 len wed_1230_1_daugherty_2baier-haasOPUNITE
 
Rx16 treat tues_200_1_jarvis_2fiscella_3balonick
Rx16 treat tues_200_1_jarvis_2fiscella_3balonickRx16 treat tues_200_1_jarvis_2fiscella_3balonick
Rx16 treat tues_200_1_jarvis_2fiscella_3balonickOPUNITE
 
Rx16 treat tues_330_1_mcneely_2d_onofrio_3macdonald
Rx16 treat tues_330_1_mcneely_2d_onofrio_3macdonaldRx16 treat tues_330_1_mcneely_2d_onofrio_3macdonald
Rx16 treat tues_330_1_mcneely_2d_onofrio_3macdonaldOPUNITE
 
Rx16 clinical wed_200_1_hall_2green
Rx16 clinical wed_200_1_hall_2greenRx16 clinical wed_200_1_hall_2green
Rx16 clinical wed_200_1_hall_2greenOPUNITE
 
Rx16 tpp tues_330_1_gavin_2saddy_3gastfriend
Rx16 tpp tues_330_1_gavin_2saddy_3gastfriendRx16 tpp tues_330_1_gavin_2saddy_3gastfriend
Rx16 tpp tues_330_1_gavin_2saddy_3gastfriendOPUNITE
 
Rx16 clinical tues_1115_group
Rx16 clinical tues_1115_groupRx16 clinical tues_1115_group
Rx16 clinical tues_1115_groupOPUNITE
 
Rx16 general session_wed_800_1_volkow copy
Rx16 general session_wed_800_1_volkow copyRx16 general session_wed_800_1_volkow copy
Rx16 general session_wed_800_1_volkow copyOPUNITE
 
Rx16 adv tues_200_1_wright_2orr_3landen_4hartstebbins
Rx16 adv tues_200_1_wright_2orr_3landen_4hartstebbinsRx16 adv tues_200_1_wright_2orr_3landen_4hartstebbins
Rx16 adv tues_200_1_wright_2orr_3landen_4hartstebbinsOPUNITE
 

What's hot (20)

Rx16 heroin tues_330_1_moser_2proescholdbell-sachdeva
Rx16 heroin tues_330_1_moser_2proescholdbell-sachdevaRx16 heroin tues_330_1_moser_2proescholdbell-sachdeva
Rx16 heroin tues_330_1_moser_2proescholdbell-sachdeva
 
Rx16 len tues_200_1_beshear_2ohr-menendez
Rx16 len tues_200_1_beshear_2ohr-menendezRx16 len tues_200_1_beshear_2ohr-menendez
Rx16 len tues_200_1_beshear_2ohr-menendez
 
Rx16 pdmp tues_200_1_o_neill_2carter_3small_armagan
Rx16 pdmp tues_200_1_o_neill_2carter_3small_armaganRx16 pdmp tues_200_1_o_neill_2carter_3small_armagan
Rx16 pdmp tues_200_1_o_neill_2carter_3small_armagan
 
Rx16 adv wed_1230_1_thau_2gorman
Rx16 adv wed_1230_1_thau_2gormanRx16 adv wed_1230_1_thau_2gorman
Rx16 adv wed_1230_1_thau_2gorman
 
Rx16 tpp wed_200_group
Rx16 tpp wed_200_groupRx16 tpp wed_200_group
Rx16 tpp wed_200_group
 
Web rx16 prev_tues_330_1_lawal_2warren_3huddleston_4pershing
Web rx16 prev_tues_330_1_lawal_2warren_3huddleston_4pershingWeb rx16 prev_tues_330_1_lawal_2warren_3huddleston_4pershing
Web rx16 prev_tues_330_1_lawal_2warren_3huddleston_4pershing
 
Web only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachio
Web only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachioWeb only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachio
Web only rx16 pharma wed_200_1_hagemeier_2fleming_3vernachio
 
Rx16 workshop 200_group_ppt
Rx16 workshop 200_group_pptRx16 workshop 200_group_ppt
Rx16 workshop 200_group_ppt
 
Rx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichting
Rx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichtingRx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichting
Rx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichting
 
Rx16 tpp wed_111_panel_paduda_pew
Rx16 tpp wed_111_panel_paduda_pewRx16 tpp wed_111_panel_paduda_pew
Rx16 tpp wed_111_panel_paduda_pew
 
Rx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsen
Rx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsenRx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsen
Rx16 treat wed_330_1_barnes_2clarkolsen
 
View only rx16 prev tues_1230_1_duwve_2adams_3proescholdbell-sachdeva
View only rx16 prev tues_1230_1_duwve_2adams_3proescholdbell-sachdevaView only rx16 prev tues_1230_1_duwve_2adams_3proescholdbell-sachdeva
View only rx16 prev tues_1230_1_duwve_2adams_3proescholdbell-sachdeva
 
Web only rx16 len wed_1230_1_daugherty_2baier-haas
Web only rx16 len wed_1230_1_daugherty_2baier-haasWeb only rx16 len wed_1230_1_daugherty_2baier-haas
Web only rx16 len wed_1230_1_daugherty_2baier-haas
 
Rx16 treat tues_200_1_jarvis_2fiscella_3balonick
Rx16 treat tues_200_1_jarvis_2fiscella_3balonickRx16 treat tues_200_1_jarvis_2fiscella_3balonick
Rx16 treat tues_200_1_jarvis_2fiscella_3balonick
 
Rx16 treat tues_330_1_mcneely_2d_onofrio_3macdonald
Rx16 treat tues_330_1_mcneely_2d_onofrio_3macdonaldRx16 treat tues_330_1_mcneely_2d_onofrio_3macdonald
Rx16 treat tues_330_1_mcneely_2d_onofrio_3macdonald
 
Rx16 clinical wed_200_1_hall_2green
Rx16 clinical wed_200_1_hall_2greenRx16 clinical wed_200_1_hall_2green
Rx16 clinical wed_200_1_hall_2green
 
Rx16 tpp tues_330_1_gavin_2saddy_3gastfriend
Rx16 tpp tues_330_1_gavin_2saddy_3gastfriendRx16 tpp tues_330_1_gavin_2saddy_3gastfriend
Rx16 tpp tues_330_1_gavin_2saddy_3gastfriend
 
Rx16 clinical tues_1115_group
Rx16 clinical tues_1115_groupRx16 clinical tues_1115_group
Rx16 clinical tues_1115_group
 
Rx16 general session_wed_800_1_volkow copy
Rx16 general session_wed_800_1_volkow copyRx16 general session_wed_800_1_volkow copy
Rx16 general session_wed_800_1_volkow copy
 
Rx16 adv tues_200_1_wright_2orr_3landen_4hartstebbins
Rx16 adv tues_200_1_wright_2orr_3landen_4hartstebbinsRx16 adv tues_200_1_wright_2orr_3landen_4hartstebbins
Rx16 adv tues_200_1_wright_2orr_3landen_4hartstebbins
 

Viewers also liked

Rx16 pharma tues_200_1_kelly_2ream_3shanehsaz
Rx16 pharma tues_200_1_kelly_2ream_3shanehsazRx16 pharma tues_200_1_kelly_2ream_3shanehsaz
Rx16 pharma tues_200_1_kelly_2ream_3shanehsazOPUNITE
 
Rx16 pharma tues_1230_1_ashley
Rx16 pharma tues_1230_1_ashleyRx16 pharma tues_1230_1_ashley
Rx16 pharma tues_1230_1_ashleyOPUNITE
 
Rx16 federal tues_330_1_spitznas_2baldwin_3welch
Rx16 federal tues_330_1_spitznas_2baldwin_3welchRx16 federal tues_330_1_spitznas_2baldwin_3welch
Rx16 federal tues_330_1_spitznas_2baldwin_3welchOPUNITE
 
Revised rx16 treat_tues_415_1_volkow_2dupont
Revised rx16 treat_tues_415_1_volkow_2dupontRevised rx16 treat_tues_415_1_volkow_2dupont
Revised rx16 treat_tues_415_1_volkow_2dupontOPUNITE
 
Rx16 tpp tues_1230_1_worthy_2williams
Rx16 tpp tues_1230_1_worthy_2williamsRx16 tpp tues_1230_1_worthy_2williams
Rx16 tpp tues_1230_1_worthy_2williamsOPUNITE
 
Web rx16 prev_tues_200_1_bretthaude-mueller_2scott_3debenedittis_4cairnes copy
Web rx16 prev_tues_200_1_bretthaude-mueller_2scott_3debenedittis_4cairnes copyWeb rx16 prev_tues_200_1_bretthaude-mueller_2scott_3debenedittis_4cairnes copy
Web rx16 prev_tues_200_1_bretthaude-mueller_2scott_3debenedittis_4cairnes copyOPUNITE
 
Rx16 advocacy tues_330_1_olsen_2raymond_3conover
Rx16 advocacy tues_330_1_olsen_2raymond_3conoverRx16 advocacy tues_330_1_olsen_2raymond_3conover
Rx16 advocacy tues_330_1_olsen_2raymond_3conoverOPUNITE
 
Rx16 vs ukhealthcare_800_group
Rx16 vs ukhealthcare_800_groupRx16 vs ukhealthcare_800_group
Rx16 vs ukhealthcare_800_groupOPUNITE
 
Rx16 clinical tues_200_1_samuels_2waller_3_lynch_4earle
Rx16 clinical tues_200_1_samuels_2waller_3_lynch_4earleRx16 clinical tues_200_1_samuels_2waller_3_lynch_4earle
Rx16 clinical tues_200_1_samuels_2waller_3_lynch_4earleOPUNITE
 
Rx16 vs appriss_tues_800_group
Rx16 vs appriss_tues_800_groupRx16 vs appriss_tues_800_group
Rx16 vs appriss_tues_800_groupOPUNITE
 
Rx16 heroin tues_200_1_allen-harocopos_2willis
Rx16 heroin tues_200_1_allen-harocopos_2willisRx16 heroin tues_200_1_allen-harocopos_2willis
Rx16 heroin tues_200_1_allen-harocopos_2willisOPUNITE
 
Rx16 vs nadcp_tues_800_1_walton
Rx16 vs nadcp_tues_800_1_waltonRx16 vs nadcp_tues_800_1_walton
Rx16 vs nadcp_tues_800_1_waltonOPUNITE
 
Rx16 presummit 200_empower_veteransprogram
Rx16 presummit 200_empower_veteransprogramRx16 presummit 200_empower_veteransprogram
Rx16 presummit 200_empower_veteransprogramOPUNITE
 
Rx16 vs ama_tues_800_harris
Rx16 vs ama_tues_800_harrisRx16 vs ama_tues_800_harris
Rx16 vs ama_tues_800_harrisOPUNITE
 
Rx16 presummit mat-mon_200_1_bisaga_2walls_3coupland_4dupont_5garcia-rosales
Rx16 presummit mat-mon_200_1_bisaga_2walls_3coupland_4dupont_5garcia-rosalesRx16 presummit mat-mon_200_1_bisaga_2walls_3coupland_4dupont_5garcia-rosales
Rx16 presummit mat-mon_200_1_bisaga_2walls_3coupland_4dupont_5garcia-rosalesOPUNITE
 
Rx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3green
Rx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3greenRx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3green
Rx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3greenOPUNITE
 

Viewers also liked (16)

Rx16 pharma tues_200_1_kelly_2ream_3shanehsaz
Rx16 pharma tues_200_1_kelly_2ream_3shanehsazRx16 pharma tues_200_1_kelly_2ream_3shanehsaz
Rx16 pharma tues_200_1_kelly_2ream_3shanehsaz
 
Rx16 pharma tues_1230_1_ashley
Rx16 pharma tues_1230_1_ashleyRx16 pharma tues_1230_1_ashley
Rx16 pharma tues_1230_1_ashley
 
Rx16 federal tues_330_1_spitznas_2baldwin_3welch
Rx16 federal tues_330_1_spitznas_2baldwin_3welchRx16 federal tues_330_1_spitznas_2baldwin_3welch
Rx16 federal tues_330_1_spitznas_2baldwin_3welch
 
Revised rx16 treat_tues_415_1_volkow_2dupont
Revised rx16 treat_tues_415_1_volkow_2dupontRevised rx16 treat_tues_415_1_volkow_2dupont
Revised rx16 treat_tues_415_1_volkow_2dupont
 
Rx16 tpp tues_1230_1_worthy_2williams
Rx16 tpp tues_1230_1_worthy_2williamsRx16 tpp tues_1230_1_worthy_2williams
Rx16 tpp tues_1230_1_worthy_2williams
 
Web rx16 prev_tues_200_1_bretthaude-mueller_2scott_3debenedittis_4cairnes copy
Web rx16 prev_tues_200_1_bretthaude-mueller_2scott_3debenedittis_4cairnes copyWeb rx16 prev_tues_200_1_bretthaude-mueller_2scott_3debenedittis_4cairnes copy
Web rx16 prev_tues_200_1_bretthaude-mueller_2scott_3debenedittis_4cairnes copy
 
Rx16 advocacy tues_330_1_olsen_2raymond_3conover
Rx16 advocacy tues_330_1_olsen_2raymond_3conoverRx16 advocacy tues_330_1_olsen_2raymond_3conover
Rx16 advocacy tues_330_1_olsen_2raymond_3conover
 
Rx16 vs ukhealthcare_800_group
Rx16 vs ukhealthcare_800_groupRx16 vs ukhealthcare_800_group
Rx16 vs ukhealthcare_800_group
 
Rx16 clinical tues_200_1_samuels_2waller_3_lynch_4earle
Rx16 clinical tues_200_1_samuels_2waller_3_lynch_4earleRx16 clinical tues_200_1_samuels_2waller_3_lynch_4earle
Rx16 clinical tues_200_1_samuels_2waller_3_lynch_4earle
 
Rx16 vs appriss_tues_800_group
Rx16 vs appriss_tues_800_groupRx16 vs appriss_tues_800_group
Rx16 vs appriss_tues_800_group
 
Rx16 heroin tues_200_1_allen-harocopos_2willis
Rx16 heroin tues_200_1_allen-harocopos_2willisRx16 heroin tues_200_1_allen-harocopos_2willis
Rx16 heroin tues_200_1_allen-harocopos_2willis
 
Rx16 vs nadcp_tues_800_1_walton
Rx16 vs nadcp_tues_800_1_waltonRx16 vs nadcp_tues_800_1_walton
Rx16 vs nadcp_tues_800_1_walton
 
Rx16 presummit 200_empower_veteransprogram
Rx16 presummit 200_empower_veteransprogramRx16 presummit 200_empower_veteransprogram
Rx16 presummit 200_empower_veteransprogram
 
Rx16 vs ama_tues_800_harris
Rx16 vs ama_tues_800_harrisRx16 vs ama_tues_800_harris
Rx16 vs ama_tues_800_harris
 
Rx16 presummit mat-mon_200_1_bisaga_2walls_3coupland_4dupont_5garcia-rosales
Rx16 presummit mat-mon_200_1_bisaga_2walls_3coupland_4dupont_5garcia-rosalesRx16 presummit mat-mon_200_1_bisaga_2walls_3coupland_4dupont_5garcia-rosales
Rx16 presummit mat-mon_200_1_bisaga_2walls_3coupland_4dupont_5garcia-rosales
 
Rx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3green
Rx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3greenRx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3green
Rx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3green
 

Similar to Web only rx16 len-tues_330_1_kougasian-sakacs_2niedermann

Rx15 clinical wed_300_1_baier_2desrosiers_3hawkinberry-paxton
Rx15 clinical wed_300_1_baier_2desrosiers_3hawkinberry-paxtonRx15 clinical wed_300_1_baier_2desrosiers_3hawkinberry-paxton
Rx15 clinical wed_300_1_baier_2desrosiers_3hawkinberry-paxtonOPUNITE
 
Criminal Law Compliance For Healthcare Professionals - Painkiller Law
Criminal Law Compliance For Healthcare Professionals - Painkiller LawCriminal Law Compliance For Healthcare Professionals - Painkiller Law
Criminal Law Compliance For Healthcare Professionals - Painkiller LawMeister Law Offices
 
Michael-Ward
Michael-WardMichael-Ward
Michael-WardOPUNITE
 
Cl 2 worth savage_rannazzisi
Cl 2 worth savage_rannazzisiCl 2 worth savage_rannazzisi
Cl 2 worth savage_rannazzisiOPUNITE
 
NEW CLAIMS TRENDS RELATED TO THE U.S. PAIN CRISIS
NEW CLAIMS TRENDS RELATED TO THE U.S. PAIN CRISISNEW CLAIMS TRENDS RELATED TO THE U.S. PAIN CRISIS
NEW CLAIMS TRENDS RELATED TO THE U.S. PAIN CRISISRachel Hamilton
 
Death with Dignity paper
Death with Dignity paperDeath with Dignity paper
Death with Dignity paperKatelyn Lutz
 
Safe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain
Safe & Effective Management of Chronic PainSafe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain
Safe & Effective Management of Chronic PainBU School of Medicine
 
Safe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain
Safe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain Safe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain
Safe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain chshanah
 
Ea 6 fingerson gay
Ea 6 fingerson gayEa 6 fingerson gay
Ea 6 fingerson gayOPUNITE
 
Substance Abuse Baraga, Michigan
Substance Abuse Baraga, MichiganSubstance Abuse Baraga, Michigan
Substance Abuse Baraga, Michiganrecoveryrestart2
 
Toronto_City_Hall_Presentation_August_4th,_2015[1]
Toronto_City_Hall_Presentation_August_4th,_2015[1]Toronto_City_Hall_Presentation_August_4th,_2015[1]
Toronto_City_Hall_Presentation_August_4th,_2015[1]Kevin Hall
 
Rx15 ea wed_300_1_perry-martin_2wethington
Rx15 ea wed_300_1_perry-martin_2wethingtonRx15 ea wed_300_1_perry-martin_2wethington
Rx15 ea wed_300_1_perry-martin_2wethingtonOPUNITE
 
Why doctors prescribe opioids to known opioid abusers
Why doctors prescribe opioids to known opioid abusersWhy doctors prescribe opioids to known opioid abusers
Why doctors prescribe opioids to known opioid abusersPaul Coelho, MD
 
Rx15 clinical tues_330_1_teater_2allespach
Rx15 clinical tues_330_1_teater_2allespachRx15 clinical tues_330_1_teater_2allespach
Rx15 clinical tues_330_1_teater_2allespachOPUNITE
 
Peter VanPelt
Peter VanPeltPeter VanPelt
Peter VanPeltOPUNITE
 
Rx15 pdmp wed_430_1_stanton_2blake_3ramsey
Rx15 pdmp wed_430_1_stanton_2blake_3ramseyRx15 pdmp wed_430_1_stanton_2blake_3ramsey
Rx15 pdmp wed_430_1_stanton_2blake_3ramseyOPUNITE
 
New Zealand Drug Courts: Driven by ideology or evidence?
New Zealand Drug Courts: Driven by ideology or evidence?New Zealand Drug Courts: Driven by ideology or evidence?
New Zealand Drug Courts: Driven by ideology or evidence?Julian Buchanan
 

Similar to Web only rx16 len-tues_330_1_kougasian-sakacs_2niedermann (20)

Rx15 clinical wed_300_1_baier_2desrosiers_3hawkinberry-paxton
Rx15 clinical wed_300_1_baier_2desrosiers_3hawkinberry-paxtonRx15 clinical wed_300_1_baier_2desrosiers_3hawkinberry-paxton
Rx15 clinical wed_300_1_baier_2desrosiers_3hawkinberry-paxton
 
Criminal Law Compliance For Healthcare Professionals - Painkiller Law
Criminal Law Compliance For Healthcare Professionals - Painkiller LawCriminal Law Compliance For Healthcare Professionals - Painkiller Law
Criminal Law Compliance For Healthcare Professionals - Painkiller Law
 
Michael-Ward
Michael-WardMichael-Ward
Michael-Ward
 
Cl 2 worth savage_rannazzisi
Cl 2 worth savage_rannazzisiCl 2 worth savage_rannazzisi
Cl 2 worth savage_rannazzisi
 
NEW CLAIMS TRENDS RELATED TO THE U.S. PAIN CRISIS
NEW CLAIMS TRENDS RELATED TO THE U.S. PAIN CRISISNEW CLAIMS TRENDS RELATED TO THE U.S. PAIN CRISIS
NEW CLAIMS TRENDS RELATED TO THE U.S. PAIN CRISIS
 
Death with Dignity paper
Death with Dignity paperDeath with Dignity paper
Death with Dignity paper
 
Safe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain
Safe & Effective Management of Chronic PainSafe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain
Safe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain
 
Safe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain
Safe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain Safe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain
Safe & Effective Management of Chronic Pain
 
Ea 6 fingerson gay
Ea 6 fingerson gayEa 6 fingerson gay
Ea 6 fingerson gay
 
Substance Abuse Baraga, Michigan
Substance Abuse Baraga, MichiganSubstance Abuse Baraga, Michigan
Substance Abuse Baraga, Michigan
 
Toronto_City_Hall_Presentation_August_4th,_2015[1]
Toronto_City_Hall_Presentation_August_4th,_2015[1]Toronto_City_Hall_Presentation_August_4th,_2015[1]
Toronto_City_Hall_Presentation_August_4th,_2015[1]
 
Rx15 ea wed_300_1_perry-martin_2wethington
Rx15 ea wed_300_1_perry-martin_2wethingtonRx15 ea wed_300_1_perry-martin_2wethington
Rx15 ea wed_300_1_perry-martin_2wethington
 
Why doctors prescribe opioids to known opioid abusers
Why doctors prescribe opioids to known opioid abusersWhy doctors prescribe opioids to known opioid abusers
Why doctors prescribe opioids to known opioid abusers
 
Overprescribing pain medication
Overprescribing pain medicationOverprescribing pain medication
Overprescribing pain medication
 
Rx15 clinical tues_330_1_teater_2allespach
Rx15 clinical tues_330_1_teater_2allespachRx15 clinical tues_330_1_teater_2allespach
Rx15 clinical tues_330_1_teater_2allespach
 
aidslinedec13
aidslinedec13aidslinedec13
aidslinedec13
 
Peter VanPelt
Peter VanPeltPeter VanPelt
Peter VanPelt
 
Rx15 pdmp wed_430_1_stanton_2blake_3ramsey
Rx15 pdmp wed_430_1_stanton_2blake_3ramseyRx15 pdmp wed_430_1_stanton_2blake_3ramsey
Rx15 pdmp wed_430_1_stanton_2blake_3ramsey
 
New Zealand Drug Courts: Driven by ideology or evidence?
New Zealand Drug Courts: Driven by ideology or evidence?New Zealand Drug Courts: Driven by ideology or evidence?
New Zealand Drug Courts: Driven by ideology or evidence?
 
2012 Health Law Seminar
2012 Health Law Seminar2012 Health Law Seminar
2012 Health Law Seminar
 

More from OPUNITE

Dr. Tom Frieden keynote
Dr. Tom Frieden keynoteDr. Tom Frieden keynote
Dr. Tom Frieden keynoteOPUNITE
 
Dr. Francis Collins keynote
Dr. Francis Collins keynoteDr. Francis Collins keynote
Dr. Francis Collins keynoteOPUNITE
 
Kana Enomoto keynote
Kana Enomoto keynoteKana Enomoto keynote
Kana Enomoto keynoteOPUNITE
 
Rx16 claad tue-vision_final
Rx16 claad tue-vision_finalRx16 claad tue-vision_final
Rx16 claad tue-vision_finalOPUNITE
 
Rx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinner
Rx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinnerRx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinner
Rx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinnerOPUNITE
 
Rx16 general session_900_1_botticelli
Rx16 general session_900_1_botticelliRx16 general session_900_1_botticelli
Rx16 general session_900_1_botticelliOPUNITE
 
Rx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichting
Rx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichtingRx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichting
Rx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichtingOPUNITE
 
Web only rx16 pharma-wed_330_1_shelley_2atwood-harless
Web only rx16 pharma-wed_330_1_shelley_2atwood-harlessWeb only rx16 pharma-wed_330_1_shelley_2atwood-harless
Web only rx16 pharma-wed_330_1_shelley_2atwood-harlessOPUNITE
 
Rx16 len wed_330_1_ferdinand_2price
Rx16 len wed_330_1_ferdinand_2priceRx16 len wed_330_1_ferdinand_2price
Rx16 len wed_330_1_ferdinand_2priceOPUNITE
 
Rx16 heroin wed_330_1_rader_2lynch-earle
Rx16 heroin wed_330_1_rader_2lynch-earleRx16 heroin wed_330_1_rader_2lynch-earle
Rx16 heroin wed_330_1_rader_2lynch-earleOPUNITE
 
Rx16 clinical wed_330_1_saunders_2wexelblatt
Rx16 clinical wed_330_1_saunders_2wexelblattRx16 clinical wed_330_1_saunders_2wexelblatt
Rx16 clinical wed_330_1_saunders_2wexelblattOPUNITE
 
Web only rx16-adv_tues_330_1_elliott_2brunson_3willis_4dean
Web only rx16-adv_tues_330_1_elliott_2brunson_3willis_4deanWeb only rx16-adv_tues_330_1_elliott_2brunson_3willis_4dean
Web only rx16-adv_tues_330_1_elliott_2brunson_3willis_4deanOPUNITE
 
Rx16 treat wed_200_group_falkinburg_miller
Rx16 treat wed_200_group_falkinburg_millerRx16 treat wed_200_group_falkinburg_miller
Rx16 treat wed_200_group_falkinburg_millerOPUNITE
 
Rx16 prevent wed_200_1_cairnes-wertnepy_2arnold
Rx16 prevent wed_200_1_cairnes-wertnepy_2arnoldRx16 prevent wed_200_1_cairnes-wertnepy_2arnold
Rx16 prevent wed_200_1_cairnes-wertnepy_2arnoldOPUNITE
 
Web only rx16 len wed_200_1_augustine_2napier_3darr - copy
Web only rx16 len wed_200_1_augustine_2napier_3darr - copyWeb only rx16 len wed_200_1_augustine_2napier_3darr - copy
Web only rx16 len wed_200_1_augustine_2napier_3darr - copyOPUNITE
 
Rx16 heroin wed_200_1_parker-daley_2guarino-luongo_3taylor
Rx16 heroin wed_200_1_parker-daley_2guarino-luongo_3taylorRx16 heroin wed_200_1_parker-daley_2guarino-luongo_3taylor
Rx16 heroin wed_200_1_parker-daley_2guarino-luongo_3taylorOPUNITE
 
Rx16 federal visionsession_200
Rx16 federal visionsession_200Rx16 federal visionsession_200
Rx16 federal visionsession_200OPUNITE
 
Rx16 federal wed_1230_1_kelly_2bohn-killorin
Rx16 federal wed_1230_1_kelly_2bohn-killorinRx16 federal wed_1230_1_kelly_2bohn-killorin
Rx16 federal wed_1230_1_kelly_2bohn-killorinOPUNITE
 

More from OPUNITE (18)

Dr. Tom Frieden keynote
Dr. Tom Frieden keynoteDr. Tom Frieden keynote
Dr. Tom Frieden keynote
 
Dr. Francis Collins keynote
Dr. Francis Collins keynoteDr. Francis Collins keynote
Dr. Francis Collins keynote
 
Kana Enomoto keynote
Kana Enomoto keynoteKana Enomoto keynote
Kana Enomoto keynote
 
Rx16 claad tue-vision_final
Rx16 claad tue-vision_finalRx16 claad tue-vision_final
Rx16 claad tue-vision_final
 
Rx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinner
Rx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinnerRx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinner
Rx16 tpp wed_330_1_stack_2nelson_3roberts_4skinner
 
Rx16 general session_900_1_botticelli
Rx16 general session_900_1_botticelliRx16 general session_900_1_botticelli
Rx16 general session_900_1_botticelli
 
Rx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichting
Rx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichtingRx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichting
Rx16 pdmp wed_330_1_hoppe_2sun_3baumgartner-leichting
 
Web only rx16 pharma-wed_330_1_shelley_2atwood-harless
Web only rx16 pharma-wed_330_1_shelley_2atwood-harlessWeb only rx16 pharma-wed_330_1_shelley_2atwood-harless
Web only rx16 pharma-wed_330_1_shelley_2atwood-harless
 
Rx16 len wed_330_1_ferdinand_2price
Rx16 len wed_330_1_ferdinand_2priceRx16 len wed_330_1_ferdinand_2price
Rx16 len wed_330_1_ferdinand_2price
 
Rx16 heroin wed_330_1_rader_2lynch-earle
Rx16 heroin wed_330_1_rader_2lynch-earleRx16 heroin wed_330_1_rader_2lynch-earle
Rx16 heroin wed_330_1_rader_2lynch-earle
 
Rx16 clinical wed_330_1_saunders_2wexelblatt
Rx16 clinical wed_330_1_saunders_2wexelblattRx16 clinical wed_330_1_saunders_2wexelblatt
Rx16 clinical wed_330_1_saunders_2wexelblatt
 
Web only rx16-adv_tues_330_1_elliott_2brunson_3willis_4dean
Web only rx16-adv_tues_330_1_elliott_2brunson_3willis_4deanWeb only rx16-adv_tues_330_1_elliott_2brunson_3willis_4dean
Web only rx16-adv_tues_330_1_elliott_2brunson_3willis_4dean
 
Rx16 treat wed_200_group_falkinburg_miller
Rx16 treat wed_200_group_falkinburg_millerRx16 treat wed_200_group_falkinburg_miller
Rx16 treat wed_200_group_falkinburg_miller
 
Rx16 prevent wed_200_1_cairnes-wertnepy_2arnold
Rx16 prevent wed_200_1_cairnes-wertnepy_2arnoldRx16 prevent wed_200_1_cairnes-wertnepy_2arnold
Rx16 prevent wed_200_1_cairnes-wertnepy_2arnold
 
Web only rx16 len wed_200_1_augustine_2napier_3darr - copy
Web only rx16 len wed_200_1_augustine_2napier_3darr - copyWeb only rx16 len wed_200_1_augustine_2napier_3darr - copy
Web only rx16 len wed_200_1_augustine_2napier_3darr - copy
 
Rx16 heroin wed_200_1_parker-daley_2guarino-luongo_3taylor
Rx16 heroin wed_200_1_parker-daley_2guarino-luongo_3taylorRx16 heroin wed_200_1_parker-daley_2guarino-luongo_3taylor
Rx16 heroin wed_200_1_parker-daley_2guarino-luongo_3taylor
 
Rx16 federal visionsession_200
Rx16 federal visionsession_200Rx16 federal visionsession_200
Rx16 federal visionsession_200
 
Rx16 federal wed_1230_1_kelly_2bohn-killorin
Rx16 federal wed_1230_1_kelly_2bohn-killorinRx16 federal wed_1230_1_kelly_2bohn-killorin
Rx16 federal wed_1230_1_kelly_2bohn-killorin
 

Recently uploaded

College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort ServiceCollege Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort ServiceNehru place Escorts
 
Call Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Surat
Call Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service SuratCall Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Surat
Call Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Suratnarwatsonia7
 
Housewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Housewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingHousewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Housewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Bookingnarwatsonia7
 
Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...
Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...
Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...narwatsonia7
 
Call Girl Service Bidadi - For 7001305949 Cheap & Best with original Photos
Call Girl Service Bidadi - For 7001305949 Cheap & Best with original PhotosCall Girl Service Bidadi - For 7001305949 Cheap & Best with original Photos
Call Girl Service Bidadi - For 7001305949 Cheap & Best with original Photosnarwatsonia7
 
Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...
Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...
Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...narwatsonia7
 
Russian Call Girl Brookfield - 7001305949 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash O...
Russian Call Girl Brookfield - 7001305949 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash O...Russian Call Girl Brookfield - 7001305949 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash O...
Russian Call Girl Brookfield - 7001305949 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash O...narwatsonia7
 
Low Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
Low Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service MumbaiLow Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
Low Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbaisonalikaur4
 
Call Girls Budhwar Peth 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Budhwar Peth 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any TimeCall Girls Budhwar Peth 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Budhwar Peth 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any Timevijaych2041
 
Call Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy Girls
Call Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy GirlsCall Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy Girls
Call Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy Girlsnehamumbai
 
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...Miss joya
 
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingCall Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Bookingnarwatsonia7
 
High Profile Call Girls Jaipur Vani 8445551418 Independent Escort Service Jaipur
High Profile Call Girls Jaipur Vani 8445551418 Independent Escort Service JaipurHigh Profile Call Girls Jaipur Vani 8445551418 Independent Escort Service Jaipur
High Profile Call Girls Jaipur Vani 8445551418 Independent Escort Service Jaipurparulsinha
 
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...narwatsonia7
 
College Call Girls Pune Mira 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girls...
College Call Girls Pune Mira 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girls...College Call Girls Pune Mira 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girls...
College Call Girls Pune Mira 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girls...Miss joya
 
Call Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort Service
Call Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort ServiceCall Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort Service
Call Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort Serviceparulsinha
 
Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804 Short 1500 💋 Night 6000
Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804  Short 1500  💋 Night 6000Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804  Short 1500  💋 Night 6000
Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804 Short 1500 💋 Night 6000aliya bhat
 
Call Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
Call Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service LucknowCall Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
Call Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknownarwatsonia7
 
Bangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% Safe
Bangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% SafeBangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% Safe
Bangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% Safenarwatsonia7
 

Recently uploaded (20)

College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort ServiceCollege Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
 
Call Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Surat
Call Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service SuratCall Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Surat
Call Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Surat
 
Housewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Housewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingHousewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Housewife Call Girls Hoskote | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
 
Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...
Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...
Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...
 
Call Girl Service Bidadi - For 7001305949 Cheap & Best with original Photos
Call Girl Service Bidadi - For 7001305949 Cheap & Best with original PhotosCall Girl Service Bidadi - For 7001305949 Cheap & Best with original Photos
Call Girl Service Bidadi - For 7001305949 Cheap & Best with original Photos
 
sauth delhi call girls in Bhajanpura 🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
sauth delhi call girls in Bhajanpura 🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Servicesauth delhi call girls in Bhajanpura 🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
sauth delhi call girls in Bhajanpura 🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
 
Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...
Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...
Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...
 
Russian Call Girl Brookfield - 7001305949 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash O...
Russian Call Girl Brookfield - 7001305949 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash O...Russian Call Girl Brookfield - 7001305949 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash O...
Russian Call Girl Brookfield - 7001305949 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash O...
 
Low Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
Low Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service MumbaiLow Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
Low Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
 
Call Girls Budhwar Peth 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Budhwar Peth 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any TimeCall Girls Budhwar Peth 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Budhwar Peth 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any Time
 
Call Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy Girls
Call Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy GirlsCall Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy Girls
Call Girls In Andheri East Call 9920874524 Book Hot And Sexy Girls
 
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...
 
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingCall Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
 
High Profile Call Girls Jaipur Vani 8445551418 Independent Escort Service Jaipur
High Profile Call Girls Jaipur Vani 8445551418 Independent Escort Service JaipurHigh Profile Call Girls Jaipur Vani 8445551418 Independent Escort Service Jaipur
High Profile Call Girls Jaipur Vani 8445551418 Independent Escort Service Jaipur
 
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...
 
College Call Girls Pune Mira 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girls...
College Call Girls Pune Mira 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girls...College Call Girls Pune Mira 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girls...
College Call Girls Pune Mira 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call girls...
 
Call Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort Service
Call Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort ServiceCall Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort Service
Call Girls Service In Shyam Nagar Whatsapp 8445551418 Independent Escort Service
 
Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804 Short 1500 💋 Night 6000
Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804  Short 1500  💋 Night 6000Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804  Short 1500  💋 Night 6000
Ahmedabad Call Girls CG Road 🔝9907093804 Short 1500 💋 Night 6000
 
Call Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
Call Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service LucknowCall Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
Call Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
 
Bangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% Safe
Bangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% SafeBangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% Safe
Bangalore Call Girls Majestic 📞 9907093804 High Profile Service 100% Safe
 

Web only rx16 len-tues_330_1_kougasian-sakacs_2niedermann

  • 1. Investigating and Prosecuting Homicide by a Prescribing Doctor Presenters: •Peter Kougasian, JD, Counsel to the Special Narcotics Prosecutor, City of New York •Ryan Sakacs, JD, Chief, Prescription Drug Investigation Unit, Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor, City of New York •John Niedermann, JD, Deputy District Attorney, Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office Law Enforcement Track Moderator: Jackie L. Steele, Jr., JD, Commonwealth Attorney, Kentucky 27th Judicial Circuit, and Vice Chairman, Operation UNITE Board of Directors
  • 2. Disclosures Peter Kougasian, JD; John Niedermann, JD; Ryan Sakacs, JD; and Jackie L. Steele, Jr., JD, have disclosed no relevant, real, or apparent personal or professional financial relationships with proprietary entities that produce healthcare goods and services.
  • 3. Disclosures • All planners/managers hereby state that they or their spouse/life partner do not have any financial relationships or relationships to products or devices with any commercial interest related to the content of this activity of any amount during the past 12 months. • The following planners/managers have the following to disclose: – John J. Dreyzehner, MD, MPH, FACOEM – Ownership interest: Starfish Health (spouse) – Robert DuPont – Employment: Bensinger, DuPont & Associates-Prescription Drug Research Center
  • 4. Learning Objectives 1. Describe two criminal cases that resulted in convictions against prescribing doctors in the deaths of their patients. 2. Identify challenges and solutions to investigating homicide by a prescribing doctor. 3. Explain how to prepare for and prosecute a criminal trial against a prescribing doctor.
  • 5. Investigating and Prosecuting Homicide by aInvestigating and Prosecuting Homicide by a Prescribing PhysicianPrescribing Physician Part One: New YorkPart One: New York ADA Ryan Sakacs & ADA Peter Kougasian Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor for the City of New York
  • 6. Disclosure statement • Assistant District Attorneys Ryan Sakacs and Peter Kougasian have disclosed no relevant, real or apparent personal or professional financial relationships with proprietary entities that produce health care goods or services.
  • 7. Learning objectives • Describe two criminal cases that resulted in convictions against prescribing doctors in the deaths of their patients. • Identify challenges and solutions to investigating homicide by a prescribing doctor. • Explain how to prepare for and prosecute a criminal trial against a prescribing doctor.
  • 8.
  • 9. “Doctor is prescribing medication to people who don’t need it” - Complaint Received by the NYPD on October 19, 2010
  • 10. First Investigative Step: Analyzing the Prescription Data
  • 11. *Decrease in prescriptions after April 2011 reflect incomplete May 2011 data How Did Prescription Activity Change Over Time?
  • 12. When Were The Prescriptions Written ?
  • 13. How Many Prescriptions Were Being Written Per Day?
  • 14. Who Received These Prescriptions?
  • 15. *Based on prescription records from January 1, 2009 - June 18, 2011. Distance Between Reported Patient Residences & Pain Management Clinic
  • 17. Dr. Stan Xuhui Li • DOB: 02/10/54 • Born in China, Naturalized Citizen • Attended Medical Schools in China and the US • Licensed to Practice Medicine in NY since 1999 • Licensed by the DEA to Prescribe Controlled Substances • Full time Anesthesiologist at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital in Hamilton, NJ • Board Certified in Anesthesiology • Board Certified in Pain Medicine • Prescriptions issued in New York State, from a location in Flushing, Queens
  • 18. Surveillance: Outside the Doctor’s Preferred Pharmacy April 30, 2011
  • 19. • Was the OSNP the proper agency to take action? – DEA – OPMC • Could we charge a physician for writing prescriptions within the context of a medical practice? • Would the case be based on undercover buys or past prescriptions? • Could we hold the doctor accountable for the deaths or endangerment of any of his patients? Considering Criminal Charges
  • 20. June 19, 2011: Medford Killings
  • 21. o Over 15,000 Prescription Records Analyzed o Extensive Surveillance Conducted o Two Confidential Informants Utilized o Over 100 Witnesses Interviewed o Multiple Bank Accounts Identified & Reviewed o Three Search Warrants Executed o Sixteen Fatal Overdoses Identified from 2009 to 2011 o 1,200 Patient Charts Reviewed o Dozens of Patient Chart Submitted for Expert Medical Review o Hundreds of Medicare and Private Insurance Claims Audited o 76 Witnesses Called Before a 6-Month Special Grand Jury Investigative Steps
  • 24. “I have been in recent contact with Jimmy’s primary doctor…He has no knowledge of your prescriptions…” “I am puzzled why you have never contacted Jimmy’s primary care physician when prescribing such serious pills and medications that could ultimately lead to death when misused or mixed with other medications that Jimmy has been taking.” “This type of negligence and abuse by your office will be made known to the proper authorities…” Letter to Doctor from Patient’s Concerned Father September 4, 2009
  • 25.
  • 26. Prescribing Practices That Jeopardized Health & Public Safety • Prescribing multiple forms of opioids to the same patient on the same day (i.e. Percocet, OxyContin, Hydrocodone and Fentanyl) • Frequently increasing dosage and quantity of pills prescribed • Prescribing dangerous combinations of drugs • Excessive, long-term opioid prescribing • Patients steered to preferred pharmacy • Patients reporting conditions such as carpal tunnel and ovarian cysts to obtain Oxycodone • Countless patients with prior convictions for narcotics-related crimes or DWI
  • 27. Focusing on the Doctor’s Criminal Conduct • Fees tied to quantities and dosages of Schedule II substances • Disregarding clear evidence of addiction, abuse, morbidity and mortality • Patients forced to pay cash for visits and procedures in addition to fees billed to Medicare and private insurance • False claims to gov’t and private health insurance • Altered patient files
  • 30. Key issues: Foreseeability: What was the likelihood that the prescription would lead to tragedy? Good faith: Was the doctor genuinely trying to treat illness, or simply selling a prescription? Causation: Is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that drugs prescribed by the doctor, as opposed to illicit drugs or drugs prescribed by other physicians, was a direct cause of death? Physician Liability for Patient Overdose
  • 31. 07/13/09 Dr. Li: 90 Oxycodone pills (30mg) 08/03/10 Substance Abuse Clinic: Suboxone 08/08/10 Dr. Li: 60 Alprazolam tablets (2 mg) Dr. Li: 120 Oxycodone pills (30mg) 08/11/10 Substance Abuse Clinic: Suboxone 08/14/10 Dr. Li: 90 Alprazolam tablets (1 mg) Dr. Li: 120 Percocet pills (10/325 mg) 08/18/10 Substance Abuse Clinic: Suboxone 08/24/10 Substance Abuse Clinic: Suboxone 09/11/10 Dr. Li: 90 Alprazolam tablets (2 mg) Dr. Li: 120 Oxycodone pills (30mg) 09/14/10 Nicholas Rappold found dead Nicholas Rappold January 6, 1989 – September 14, 2010 9/13/10:OXY PILLS PURCHASED ON STREET
  • 32. Li’s Prescriptions Were a Proximate Cause of Death
  • 33. • Manslaughter in the Second Degree (2 counts) • Reckless Endangerment in the First Degree (3 counts) • Reckless Endangerment in the Second Degree (4 counts) • Criminal Sale of a Prescription for a Controlled Substance (180 counts) • Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree (1 count) • Grand Larceny in the Third Degree (2 counts) • Offering a False Instrument for Filing in the First Degree (8 counts) • Falsification of Business Records in the First Degree (16 counts, reduced to 11 following motion practice) Charges
  • 35. Part 2 - Trial
  • 36. The subjective mental element • Penal Law Section 220.65 (Criminal Sale of a Prescription for a Controlled Substance): – “…a person sells a prescription for a controlled substance unlawfully when he does so other than in good faith in the course of his professional practice.” (emphasis added)
  • 37. Manslaughter in the Second Degree • “A person is guilty of manslaughter in the second degree when…he recklessly causes the death of another person.” (NY Penal Law Section 125.15[1]) • “A person acts recklessly…when he is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that such result will occur…The risk must be of such a nature and degree that disregard thereof constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable person would observe…” (emphasis added)
  • 38. Evidentiary issues – Motions in limine • How much context would Court allow into evidence? – Statistics regarding • Numbers of patients seen in one day • Numbers of prescriptions written in one day • Distances traveled by patients – Financial data • Cash deposits to bank accounts in New Jersey – Surveillance of crowds waiting for doctor to arrive – Descriptions of conditions in waiting room
  • 39. Sheer number of patients seen per day strongly suggested a “pill mill”
  • 40.
  • 41. Surveillance recorded patients loitering Outside of Doctor’s Office - June 25, 2011
  • 42. Theme of Defense Defendant was a conscientious doctor who brought board-certified pain management to an underserved neighborhood
  • 43. Theme of defense: Defendant was a conscientious doctor who provided high quality care • Defense expert: board certified in anesthesiology and pain management and a founding member of the New York Pain Society. • Testified with respect to every charged prescription that it was consistent with effective and conscientious medical practice.
  • 44. Countering the theme of the defense • People’s expert: Board certified in anesthesiology and pain management, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Medical Director of Pain Management. • Testified that patient records lacked a “work- up,” and often lacked any imaging or records from or referral letters from other doctors. • No demonstration that defendant was actually practicing medicine.
  • 45. Countering defense theme (“Defendant provided high-quality medical care…”) (Patient had recently had gastric bypass and large weight loss)
  • 46. Countering defense theme, cont’d. • Doctor added fictitious vital signs to records before submitting to OPMC
  • 47. Countering defense theme, cont’d. Fictitious vital signs:
  • 49.
  • 50. Defense arguments at trial • Patients lied to the doctor (e.g. claimed to be in serious pain) and doctor believed them • Doctor often began patients with dosages lower than they reported on intake, and sometimes suggested tapering schedules • Patients took drugs other than as directed and were multi-sourcing • Other doctors prescribed in equal or greater doses to these patients
  • 51. Meeting the Defenses “The patients lied…” Counterargument: While patients did indeed lie to the defendant, it is clear that the defendant knew they were lying, or was at least profoundly indifferent.
  • 52. Alterations refute defense that doctor was deceived by patients
  • 53. Alterations refute defense that doctor was deceived by the patient
  • 54.
  • 55. Meeting the defenses “The patients were multi-sourcing…” The evidence demonstrated that defendant was aware of the multi-sourcing, and yet continued to prescribe.
  • 56. Defendant prescribed in the face of outrageous muti-sourcing
  • 57. Meeting the defenses “The doctor used tapering schedules”
  • 58. Counterargument: the Doctor routinely ignored his own tapering schedules
  • 59. Tapering schedules were ignored March 1, 2008 intake form: Excerpt from medical record, 2009:
  • 60. Meeting the defenses “the doctor often began the patients with dosages lower than what they had been receiving before they came to see him”
  • 61. Defense: “but often the doctor began by lowering the dosage…” Counterargument: where there is no physical examination, only a cursory patient interview, and no attempt to diagnose the genesis of the pain, there is no practice of medicine, even if the prescription is for slightly lower dosages than the patient claimed to be receiving.
  • 62. Verdict • Defendant convicted on 198 out of 211 counts: – 2 counts of Manslaughter in the Second Degree – 3 counts of Reckless Endangerment in the First Degree – 3 counts of Reckless Endangerment in the Second Degree – 170 counts of Criminal Sale of a Prescription for a Controlled Substance
  • 63. Verdict, cont’d… – 1 count of Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree – 2 counts of Grand Larceny in the Third Degree – 9 counts of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree – 8 counts of Offering a False Document for Filing
  • 64. Newsday, July 19, 2014 • “Substance abuse experts praised the verdicts. ‘I hope this sends a message to other physicians,’ said Dr. Jeffrey Reynolds of the Family and Children’s Association in Mineola. ‘…Long Island is wrestling with a profound prescription drug crisis, which is fueled in large part by a small number of overprescribing doctors.’”
  • 65. PROSECUTING A DOCTORPROSECUTING A DOCTOR FOR MURDERFOR MURDER
  • 66. SEPTEMBER 2007 TO MAY 2010 (LESS THAN 3 YEARS)SEPTEMBER 2007 TO MAY 2010 (LESS THAN 3 YEARS) PC 187 PC 187 PC 187 PC 187 PC 187 PC 187
  • 67.
  • 68. FELONY MURDER +The unlawful killing of a human being, +Whether intentional, unintentional, or accidental, +Which occurs during the commission or attempted commission of felony, +When the perpetrator had the specific intent to commit that specified felony = MURDER
  • 69. FELONY MURDER +The unlawful killing of a human being, +Whether intentional, unintentional, or accidental, +Which occurs during the commission or attempted commission of felony, +When the perpetrator had the specific intent to commit that specified felony = MURDER CALIFORNIACALIFORNIA OVER-PRESCRIBING STATUTESOVER-PRESCRIBING STATUTES
  • 72. SECOND DEGREE MURDER DANGEROUS TO LIFE 1. The killing resulted from an intentional act, 2. The natural consequences of the act are dangerous to human life, and 3. The act was deliberately performed with knowledge of the danger to, and with conscious disregard for, human life. • When the killing is the direct result of such an act, it is notWhen the killing is the direct result of such an act, it is not necessary to prove that the defendant intended that thenecessary to prove that the defendant intended that the act would result in the death of a human being.act would result in the death of a human being.
  • 73.
  • 74. DR. WALTER STRAUSERDR. WALTER STRAUSER THE STANDARD OF CARETHE STANDARD OF CARE “THE LEVEL OF SKILL, KNOWLEDGE AND CARE IN DIAGNOSING AND TREATING THAT A REASONABLY PRUDENT PHYSICIAN WOULD EXERCISE IN SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES.” THE SAME STANDARD OF CARE APPLIES TO ALL PHYSICIANS AN EXTREME DEPARTURE FROM THE STANDARD OF CARE: GROSS NEGLIGENCE AND LACK OF SCANT CARE
  • 75.
  • 76. THE UNDERCOVER OPERATIONS SPECIAL AGENT STEPHANIE MORELANDSPECIAL AGENT STEPHANIE MORELAND APRIL 25, 2008APRIL 25, 2008 • TOLD DEFENDANT SHE NEEDED SOMETHING FOR CRAMPS AND A HEADACHE • TOLD THE DEFENDANT SHE WAS COMING FROM OCEANSIDE • NO PHYSICAL EXAM WAS GIVEN • DEFENDANT SAID SHE WOULD PRESCRIBE VICODIN TO TAKE THE EDGES OFF
  • 77.
  • 79. CONDITIONS INSIDE THE CLINIC DR. TU’S OFFICE DR. TSENG’S OFFICE
  • 80. GLORIA RODRIGUEZGLORIA RODRIGUEZ DEMOGRAPHIC OF PATIENTS CHANGED OVER TIME: •YOUNG KIDS 18 TO 25 •WHITE •NOT FROM THE AREA • A LOT CAME FROM ORANGE OR RIVERSIDE COUNTIES •TATTOOS •SOMETIMES WERE ANXIOUS OR AGITATED WAIT TIME CHANGE FROM AN HOUR TO TWO OR THREE HOURS RECEPTIONISTRECEPTIONIST
  • 81. GLORIA RODRIGUEZGLORIA RODRIGUEZ CASH INCREASED FROMCASH INCREASED FROM $500-$600 PER DAY$500-$600 PER DAY TO $2,000 SOMETIMESTO $2,000 SOMETIMES $3,000 PER DAY$3,000 PER DAY ““They’re druggies, theyThey’re druggies, they can wait.”can wait.” PER ADVANCED CAREPER ADVANCED CARE AAA TAX RETURNSAAA TAX RETURNS 2007-20102007-2010 + $5,000,000+ $5,000,000
  • 82. SOME PATIENTS HAD BLANK RECORDS IN 2010 THEN HAD COMPLETED RECORDS IN 2012STEVEN OGLESTEVEN OGLE 2010 2012
  • 83. SOME PATIENTS HAD NO TREATMENT RECORDS AT ALL
  • 84. CREATING A CAPTIVE AUDIENCECREATING A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE MICHAEL COOK: WITHDRAWAL IS HELL. THE BODY GETS WEAKER AND THE TOLERANCE GROWS. IT’S AN EQUATION FOR DISASTER. JUSTIN SMITH: WOULD WAIT 2-3 HOURS EACH TIME BECAUSE HE NEEDED TO GET HIS MEDICATION. WHEN YOU ARE ADDICTED, YOU DON’T REALLY CARE WHAT YOU TAKE OR WHAT YOU DO. IF IT MAKES YOU NORMAL OR HIGH, THEN IT WORKS. AND THERE IS A RISK OF DYING ALMOST EVERY DAY. LANA RAU: FELT LIKE SHE WAS GOING THROUGH WITHDRAWALS EVERY MORNING AND NEEDED THE MEDICATION JUST TO FEEL NORMAL. ALEXANDER HUY: HE WOULD WAIT UP TO 6 HOURS JUST TO GET HIS PRESCRIPTION.
  • 85.
  • 87. DR. EZEKIEL FINKDR. EZEKIEL FINK IMPACT OF NOTIFICATION OF AIMPACT OF NOTIFICATION OF A PATIENT DEATH ON THE PRACTICEPATIENT DEATH ON THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINEOF MEDICINE ““I THINK THAT A PATIENT DYING IN ONE’SI THINK THAT A PATIENT DYING IN ONE’S CARE WOULD HAVE A PROFOUNDCARE WOULD HAVE A PROFOUND IMPACT AND WOULD MAKE ME GO BACKIMPACT AND WOULD MAKE ME GO BACK AND TRY TO FIGURE OUT IF THERE WASAND TRY TO FIGURE OUT IF THERE WAS SOMETHING THAT COULD HAVE BEENSOMETHING THAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE DIFFERENT TO PREVENT THATDONE DIFFERENT TO PREVENT THAT DEATH.”DEATH.” ““DIDN’T CREATE AN ISSUE IN THE OFFICE. WASDIDN’T CREATE AN ISSUE IN THE OFFICE. WAS AN ORDINARY CALL, MOSTLY FYI.”AN ORDINARY CALL, MOSTLY FYI.” Dr. Gene Tu
  • 88. MATTHEW STAVRONMATTHEW STAVRON BRUCE STAVRON: •DRUG USE BEGAN AT 15 YEARS OLD •WAS UNDER THE INFLUENCE 30-40% OF THE TIME •COULDN’T SEND HIM TO REHAB BECAUSE IT HE DIDN’T HAVE THE RESOURCES •PRIOR TO HIS DEATH, MATTHEW WAS IN THE BEST HEALTH BRUCE HAD SEEN HIM
  • 89. MATTHEW STAVRONMATTHEW STAVRON EXTREME DEPARTUREEXTREME DEPARTURE FROM THE STANDARD OF CAREFROM THE STANDARD OF CARE IN EVALUATING PRIOR TOIN EVALUATING PRIOR TO PRESCRIBING CONTROLLEDPRESCRIBING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCESSUBSTANCES STRAUSERSTRAUSER 2 DAYS 2 DAYS SEPTEMBER 16, 2007SEPTEMBER 16, 2007
  • 90. MATTHEW STAVRONMATTHEW STAVRON VICTORIA REICHARTVICTORIA REICHART:: She had concerns of drug seeking.She had concerns of drug seeking. Said Stavron had an injury but did not knowSaid Stavron had an injury but did not know the source of the injury.the source of the injury. DECEASED DECEASED
  • 91.
  • 92.
  • 93. DECEASED DECEASED MATTHEW STAVRONMATTHEW STAVRON ANDERSONANDERSON CAUSE OF DEATH: OXYCODONE WAS TOXICCAUSE OF DEATH: OXYCODONE WAS TOXIC
  • 94. RYAN LATHAMRYAN LATHAM MARK LATHAM: •HIS SON BEGAN TO USE VICODIN AFTER HE BROKE HIS JAW IN JANUARY 2007 •HIS PERSONALITY CHANGED AND HE WAS LETHARGIC AND LISTLESS •LIFE TOOK AN UPSWING AND HE WENT BACK TO COLLEGE •PRIOR TO HIS DEATH, HE’D BEEN IN A FIGHT DEFENDING HIS FRIEND
  • 95. RYAN LATHAMRYAN LATHAM 6 DAYS 6 DAYS MARCH 25, 2008MARCH 25, 2008
  • 96. RYAN LATHAMRYAN LATHAM KELLY RALPHKELLY RALPH:: Had back pain with unknown source but appearedHad back pain with unknown source but appeared to be a sports injury.to be a sports injury. Thought 5 hydrocodone per day was safe.Thought 5 hydrocodone per day was safe. DECEASED DECEASED
  • 97.
  • 98.
  • 99. DECEASED DECEASED RYAN LATHAMRYAN LATHAM ANDERSONANDERSON CAUSE OF DEATH: HYDROCODONE WAS A TOXIC LEVELCAUSE OF DEATH: HYDROCODONE WAS A TOXIC LEVEL
  • 100. MICHAEL COOKMICHAEL COOK It never took long in the exam room and no physical exam was done. Started adding prescriptions to what I wanted. Overdosed 3 times in 2 days, the last time in the restroom at AAA.
  • 101. MICHAEL COOKMICHAEL COOK Went to clinic on April 25, 2008. Patient’s screen was positive for opiates. Doctor said he’d taken 6 Opana yesterday. MATTHEW BRIONESMATTHEW BRIONES
  • 102. NAYTHAN KENNEYNAYTHAN KENNEY ERIN WHITNEY: •DOCTOR’S RECEPTION AREA LOOKED LIKE A PAROLE OFFICE • PEOPLE IN THERE HAD LOTS OF TATTOOS • DRUG DEALING AND PEOPLE EXCHANGING NUMBERS • 2 TO 3 PEOPLE IN EACH EXAM ROOM •SHE RECEIVED PRESCRIPTIONS FROM THE DEFENDANT WITH NO EXAM, NO X-RAYS
  • 103. NAYTHAN KENNEYNAYTHAN KENNEY 4 DAYS 4 DAYS SEPTEMBER 16, 2008SEPTEMBER 16, 2008
  • 104. NAYTHAN KENNEYNAYTHAN KENNEY STRAUSERSTRAUSER No medical record except date of visit, blood pressure and pulse or no examination of the patient while giving controlled substances is an Extreme Departure from the standard of care. It falls outside the scope of practice.
  • 105.
  • 106. DECEASED DECEASED NAYTHAN KENNEYNAYTHAN KENNEY ANDERSONANDERSON CAUSE OF DEATH: OXYCODONECAUSE OF DEATH: OXYCODONE AND METHADONEAND METHADONE BOTH AT TOXIC LEVELSBOTH AT TOXIC LEVELS OXYCODONE IN THE “HIGHER ECHELON” OF TOXICOXYCODONE IN THE “HIGHER ECHELON” OF TOXIC
  • 108. VU NGUYENVU NGUYEN VIET NGUYEN: •DID NOT KNOW OF ANY MEDICAL CONDITIONS AS TO WHY HIS BROTHER WOULD BE ON PAIN KILLERS NISHA ANAYA: •VU WAS NOT IN VISIBLE PAIN—HE WAS YOUNG AND HE WORKED HARD SAMANTHA NGUYEN: •KNEW OF NO MEDICAL OR PSYCHOLOGICAL REASONS FOR HIM TO GET PRESCRIPTIONS
  • 109. VU NGUYENVU NGUYEN FEBRUARY 7, 2009FEBRUARY 7, 2009
  • 111. DECEASED DECEASED VU NGUYENVU NGUYEN STRAUSERSTRAUSER REFILLED HIS MEDICATION EARLY CHANGE HIS NORCO TO OPANA WHICH IS 3 TIMES STRONGER PRESCRIBED HIM TWO SHORT ACTING OPIOIDS AT THE SAME TIME. THAT DOESN’T MAKE PHARMACOLOGICAL OR CLINICAL SENSE. NOTICE TO THE DEFENDANT THAT HER PATIENTSNOTICE TO THE DEFENDANT THAT HER PATIENTS ARE ABUSING THEIR MEDICATIONARE ABUSING THEIR MEDICATION
  • 112. DECEASED DECEASED VU NGUYENVU NGUYEN ANDERSONANDERSON CAUSE OF DEATH: OXYMORPHONE, WITHCAUSE OF DEATH: OXYMORPHONE, WITH METHADONEMETHADONE AND ALPRAZOLAM AS CONTRIBUTORSAND ALPRAZOLAM AS CONTRIBUTORS
  • 113. DECEASED DECEASED VU NGUYENVU NGUYEN ERICA ARELLANO: He was always seeking more medications and stronger dosages. Never prescribed methadone but thought that he was drug seeking with other physicians.
  • 115. STEVEN OGLESTEVEN OGLE ELISSA OGLE: •LIVED WITH HER BROTHER-IN-LAW IN PALM SPRINGS. DROVE 1 HOUR AND 10 MINUTES ONE WAY TO SEE THE DEFENDANT •CONFRONTED STEVEN ABOUT HIS DRUG USE WHEN HE APPEARED UNDER THE INFLUENCE •HE SAID HE WAS GOING TO CONTINUE TO USE IT BECAUSE IT WAS PRESCRIBED BY HIS DOCTOR •ON THE LAST VISIT TO AAA, SAW SOMEONE LEAVE THE RESTROOOM AND THERE WAS SMOKE AND A DISCARDED SYRINGE IN THE TRASH
  • 116. STEVEN OGLESTEVEN OGLE APRIL 7, 2009APRIL 7, 2009
  • 117. STEVEN OGLESTEVEN OGLE 2 DAYS 2 DAYS DECEASED DECEASED
  • 118. DECEASED DECEASED STEVEN OGLESTEVEN OGLE FINKFINK THE AMOUNT OF MEDICATION OGLE CLAIMED TO BE TAKING WAS OUTRAGEOUS. WITH A PATIENT LIKE THIS, YOU HAVE TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE IN THE RIGHT PLACE BECAUSE IT’S GOING TO BE THE LAST APPOINTMENT THEY EVER HAVE WITH YOU IF YOU DON’T TREAT IT WITH THE RIGHT SERIOUSNESS.
  • 119. DECEASED DECEASED STEVEN OGLESTEVEN OGLE ANDERSONANDERSON CAUSE OF DEATH: METHADONE WAS A TOXIC LEVELCAUSE OF DEATH: METHADONE WAS A TOXIC LEVEL
  • 121. JOSEPH ROVEROJOSEPH ROVERO JOSEPH ROVERO JR.: •DID NOT KNOW OF ANY NEED FOR HIS SON TO TAKE PRESCRIPTIONS FOR ANY PHYSICAL OR PSYCHOLOGICAL NEED. •SPOKE TO JOEY IN DECEMBER ON HIS WAY HOME AND HE SAID HE WAS DOING SOME GUY A FAVOR. ONLY TIME HE HEARD JOEY SLURRING HIS WORDS. DAVID LOVE: •WORKS FOR THE MARICOPA COUNTY MEDICAL EXAMINER’S OFFICE. •CONTACTED THE DEFENDANT FOR JOEY’S MEDICAL RECORDS AND SHE INITIALLY REFUSED TO SEND HIM MEDICAL RECORDS BECAUSE SHE HAD ONLY TREATED HIM ONCE AND DIDN’T HAVE MANY RECORDS.
  • 122. THE ARIZONA CONNECTIONTHE ARIZONA CONNECTION 361 MILES
  • 123. JOSEPH ROVEROJOSEPH ROVERO DECEMBER 9, 2009DECEMBER 9, 2009
  • 124. JOSEPH ROVEROJOSEPH ROVERO DECEASED DECEASED DECEMBER 18, 2009DECEMBER 18, 2009 9 DAYS 9 DAYS
  • 125.
  • 126. ANDERSONANDERSON CAUSE OF DEATH: OXYCODONE IN A LEVEL FORCAUSE OF DEATH: OXYCODONE IN A LEVEL FOR A NAÏVE USER THAT WOULD BE LETHAL IFA NAÏVE USER THAT WOULD BE LETHAL IF COMBINED WITH ALCOHOL (.10 -- .13)COMBINED WITH ALCOHOL (.10 -- .13) DECEASED DECEASED JOSEPH ROVEROJOSEPH ROVERO
  • 128.
  • 129. LANA RAULANA RAU OCTOBER 5, 2009OCTOBER 5, 2009
  • 130. LANA RAULANA RAU Went to Dr. Tseng for pain medication. Paid $110 for each visit. One payment for her and one for Joseph. Sometimes she would wait for Dr. Tseng in the storage room when she was in a hurry. Was coming in every 6 days and was taking up to 70 pills a day. Dr. Tseng would write prescriptions under Joseph’s name at her request. He was not there with her when she asked for this.
  • 131. LANA RAULANA RAU FINKFINK Was taking twice the amount of a toxic dose of acetaminophen every day. Writing prescriptions for Lana Rau under the name of Joseph Rau is exceptionally bizarre behavior. I just can’t wrap my head around it. I have only seen this in my career once, right now. I’m never going to see this again.
  • 133. SEPTEMBERSEPTEMBER 20082008 KENNEYKENNEY NGUYENNGUYEN MARCHMARCH 20092009 5 ½ MONTHS5 ½ MONTHS 4 WEEKS4 WEEKS OGLEOGLE APRILAPRIL 20092009 KATSNELSONKATSNELSON APRILAPRIL 20092009 8 DAYS8 DAYS ROVEROROVERO DECEMBERDECEMBER 20092009 8 MONTHS8 MONTHS PATTERNPATTERN APPRECIATION OF THE RISK/CONSCIOUS DISREGARDAPPRECIATION OF THE RISK/CONSCIOUS DISREGARD
  • 134.
  • 135. Investigating and Prosecuting Homicide by a Prescribing Doctor Presenters: •Peter Kougasian, JD, Counsel to the Special Narcotics Prosecutor, City of New York •Ryan Sakacs, JD, Chief, Prescription Drug Investigation Unit, Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor, City of New York •John Niedermann, JD, Deputy District Attorney, Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office Law Enforcement Track Moderator: Jackie L. Steele, Jr., JD, Commonwealth Attorney, Kentucky 27th Judicial Circuit, and Vice Chairman, Operation UNITE Board of Directors

Editor's Notes

  1. Thank you very much for this opportunity to address the committees, and special thanks to Wendy Luftig for organizing the event. We are here to introduce you to the case of People v. Li, the prosecution of a physician on counts of Crim Sale Prescription, Man 2, Reckless Endangerment, Scheme to Defraud and other counts for his operation of a pill mill in Flushing, Queens. This case raised many thorny issues, ranging from medical discretion and a physician’s responsibility for the drug abuses of his patients, to Medicare fraud and the helplessness of families whose loved ones are gripped by opioid addictions. There are two ways to summarize the scope and significance of this case. We can talk about it as a case that spanned four years, two indictments, a six-month special grand jury, 211 counts of criminal charges including 2 counts of man 2, a 4 ½ month trial involving 72 witnesses, 198 counts of conviction and 10-20 years in prison, the first such conviction of which we are aware in NY state for a physician.
  2. But there’s another way to talk about the case: Nicholas Rappold. Joseph Haeg. Michael Cornetta. Tara Palamar. Giovanni Manzella. Alexander Mitzner. Kevin Kingsley. Beth Kingsley. They are dead. They all died of overdoses. They were all patients of Dr. Stan Li, the defendant in this case. He knew they were addicts, he knew they were abusing their medications. And they are not the only ones. These are just the ones whose names and photos are in the public domain since the trial. Over the course of the investigation, we confirmed that 16 patients of Dr. Li died of prescription drug overdoses –usually oxycodone and xanax – while they were under his care, or within one year of leaving his clinic. Every single member of the investigative team – even the most experienced homicide detectives or former homicide ADAs, including PK, was haunted by high number of deaths and our encounters with all of the grieving families. I think that is the true measure of this case, because despite all of the complicated legal questions that arose and occupied us, we were first and foremost dealing with a public health emergency. It is our belief and hope that most physicians, upon hearing the details of Dr. Li’s practice, would be reassured that this case does not signal an attack on medical discretion. We’d like to tell you about the steps we took to investigate and prosecute this case, and we look forward to hearing your questions and comments.
  3. This case began in Dec 2010 with a tiny post-it note, when a Queens Narcotics detective called OSNP to report a civilian complaint. My bureau chief asked me to call him back – little did we know at the time what this case would become. The complaint wasn’t about a street dealer, it wasn’t about crack or heroin. It was about a doctor. A doctor writing prescriptions for narcotic painkillers – specifically, oxycodone. Our office – and I personally - had prosecuted prescription drug crimes before, but never involving a physician: where to begin? The first step was to meet the complainant, Matthew Reale. And here we ran into our first hurdle: the NYPD customarily tests CIs by sending them out to buy drugs. Our complainant was a young man who had struggled with drug addiction in the past, was trying to live a sober and law-abiding life, and was suffering from a debilitating central nervous system disease. He did not want to go out on the streets to buy drugs, and his relationship with the detectives quickly deteriorated. Eventually, we informed Queens Narcotics that we would contact the complainant directly, and our investigators brought him in to talk. We learned that he was on Medicare at age 26 due to his medical disability, and that he was in a lot of pain due to his medical condition. In early 2010, he was hanging out with a group of yong men in a neighborhood park, mostly tough guys, some drug dealers he knew from growing up, and when they heard that he needed a new doctor, they had a recommendation: Dr. Stan Li, on 41st Road. Needless to say, none of these guys had a medical condition, so Reale thought maybe given his medical history, Dr. Li would be able to help him. In fact, Dr. Li was more than willing to prescribe narcotic painkillers to Reale, but there was a catch. First, he never spent more than a few minutes with Reale. Why? Because his clinic was only open one day a week, on the weekends, and there were dozens of people waiting to see him, some of whom had been lining up since 7 am. In fact, the dcotor’s staff distributed numbered tickets, there were no appointments. Second, he never seemed to remember Reale’s medical history – Reale brought him documents, but Dr. Li didn’t care to read them. Third, he claimed that Medicare wasn’t paying him for the visits, so he forced Reale to oay him cash up front, and promised to pay him back when Medicare sent the check. Of course, that never happened. And finally, Dr. Li convinced Reale to try Xanax – Reale became addicted, and eventually overdosed. What Reale described to us seemed impossible: a clinic open one day a week, where close to a hundred patients a day saw a doctor for just a few minutes each with their numbered tickets, most patients were young, without apparent medical conditions, and the doctor routinely prescribed oxycodone in combination with Xanax in exchange for cash. Our first challenge was how to verify this information, and determine whether we had any grounds to intervene.
  4. Our first step was to examine prescription data to see what, how much, and to whom the doctor was prescribing? [Explain BNE data] I ordered prescription data going back to 2008, and spent hours reviewing it in a spreadsheet. In that way, we confirmed that the doctor was only prescribing one day a week, mostly prescribing Sched II substances, mostly oxy and xanax, and that there were being prescribed in roughly the same amounts and combinations to nearly 100 patients a day, many of whom were young people paying cash for the medications. First, we found a tremendous NUMBER of controlled substance prescriptions. Second, we found that an overwhelming majority of those prescriptions were for oxycodone – and within that, mostly for 30mg pills. If this was medicine, it was “one size fits all.” Finally, you don’t see it on this chart, but most of those oxycodone prescriptions were paired with a prescription for xanax – alprazolam. That is a benzodiazepine, a class of medication that acts on the central nervous system and is considered a high-risk combination with oxy because they BOTH depress breathing functions. 3% blue: zolpidem (ambien) 2% orange: Morphine 2% grey: fentanyl
  5. How had the prescribing evolved over time? It increased. You can clearly see here an almost 8-fold increase in prescriptions over three years. [June 2011 – Medford Effect]
  6. One day a week.
  7. We were ultimately able to determine that the Monday-Friday dates were errors; all prescriptions were written one day a week, usually Saturdays but occasionally Sundays.
  8. This analysis was a clincher: how far were patients traveling to see Dr. Li? Also damning: payment. More than half of his patients were paying cash for prescriptions at the pharmacies.
  9. We corroborated the data through surveillance and interviews. First, we confirmed that all of these prescriptions were being written one day a week. This fit with the information we had about the doctor.
  10. Dr Stan XuHui Li He’s licensed Not only licensed, but accredited in a field (Pain Management) that focuses on chronic pain conditions often treated with narcotic painkillers. He has a full-time job, in NJ: anesthesiologist at the Robert Wood Johnson Hospital
  11. We confirmed, through surveillance, that there many patients waiting outside, lining up early in the morning. We also confirmed that Dr. Li’s prescriptions were feeding a black market for these drugs. The two individuals in this video were eventually arrested and charged. Both pleaded guilty and are serving state prison sentences.
  12. As we began considering criminal charges, a number of questions arose. DEA: sent investigators, interviewed the doctor, but never took action. OPMC: due process issues. We knew they had a case, but did not want to taint our investigation by gaining access to any information obtained from the doctor pursuant to the agency’s authority. Local DA’s offices: could make sense, given the deaths and the location of the office, but we suspected there may be insurance fraud and wanted to be sure all of the conduct was captured in one case. With our 5-boro jurisdiction, we were well-positioned to do that. This was not a person selling oxy from an ice cream truck, or a doctor writing prescriptions in parking lots or motels. This was a qualified & highly trained doctor, running a pain management practice (lots of painkillers). Obviously, this affected our consideration of possible charges. Drug sale felonies were not an option – prescribing, not selling pills A drug dealer has no right to possess or sell heroin or cocaine (neither does a doctor, for that matter). But a doctor is generally exempt from prosecution for controlled substance offenses when “lawfully administering, dispensing, or prescribing a controlled substance in the course of his [or her] professional practice to an ultimate user for a recognized medical purpose.” (N.Y.S. Public Health Law Section 3328). But a doctor loses that protection when the prescription is written “to an addict or habitual user,” subject to certain exceptions, such as to treat an incurable disease, or to treat acute withdrawal symptoms (NYS Public Health Law Sections 3350 and 3351). Further, the same chapter of the Penal Law that recognizes a doctor’s right to possess controlled substances also defines the crime of Criminal Sale of a Prescription for a Controlled Substance, which is committed when “ [A] practitioner…knowingly and unlawfully sells a prescription for a controlled substance…[unlawfully being defined as] other than in good faith in the course of his [or her] professional practice.” Penal Law Section 220.65 How to prove “other than in good faith”? Some factors were listed in People v. Doe, 178 Misc2d. 908 (1998): Knowledge that drugs would be resold Unusually brief or perfunctory patient visits Dosages beyond that required for legitimate treatment Payments beyond those reflecting fees for visits Absence of patient symptoms Knowledge that prescription was being issued to an habitual user, other than to treat acute symptoms UC Buys or Historical? Could we hold def accountable for deaths/overdoses?
  13. On Sunday, June 19, 2011, a man shot four people in cold blood in a pharmacy in Medford, Long Island, and made off with 10,000 Vicodin pills. When we came into the office the next day, Monday, we decided to take a look through our prescription data to see if any of Dr. Li’s patients had filled prescriptions in that pharmacy – knowing that many patients traveled far to see him. We found several. We then ran criminal history checks, and found that one of them had a gun license: David Laffer. He had last seen Dr. Li on June 11, 2011, just a week earlier, and had been a patient for approximately one year. Over the course of that year, he had been receiving prescriptions for one drug, in increasing quantities: Vicodin. The same day, we passed along that information to the Suffolk County Police Department. Two days later, on Wednesday the 22nd, David Laffer was arrested. He ultimately pled guilty and is serving a life sentence. This event crystallized the danger of Dr. Li’s practice: feeding a network of addiction breeds death, both self-inflicted through drug abuse and through violence. It also made us realize that we could not wait for the DEA or OPMC to take action. Apparently even Dr. Li realized the significance of this event: we later learned that he stopped seeing new patients starting the weekend after the shootings. He did not, however, close the clinic or change his prescribing practices significantly.
  14. We committed to a wide-ranging, resource-intensive investigation. At first we hoped to base charges on undercover buys. The plan was to introduce undercovers through existing patients who had agreed to serve as CIs. Unfortunately, by the time we sent in our informants with recording devices, Dr. Li had decided not to take any new patients. Each of these steps involved a tremendous amount of discussion, research, legwork, teamwork, resources and time. Given the stakes – with the team learning about more deaths every month, we felt great pressure to act fast and get it right. As a result, many of these steps had to be taken at the same time.
  15. I’ll talk in a bit more detail about just a few of the steps. First, our efforts to identify any patients who had suffered fatal or near-fatal overdoses. How did we do it? We contacted the ME’s office, and asked questions about their process. Was there a record kept of the causes of death for all NYC decedents? Who conducted autopsies on suspected overdoses (turns out, all those autopsies conducted in Manhattan, made it easier); did they have a database of decedents with causes of death? Was it searchable? What were the keywords we could use? With their guidance, we crafted subpoenas searching for specific drug names, received lists of decedents, cross-referenced those lists against our patients lists, confirmed matches with other database searches and in-person interviews – and then repeated the process every month. In the end, we identified 16 patients who either were, at the time of their deaths, or had been patients of Dr Li. All dead of opioid overdoses. Our office now systematically updates these records and cross-references whenever we have patient lists in an investigation, so that we have an alert system for doctors whose practices are creating a risk to public safety. By October 2011, we had identified ten deaths, and knew we were dealing with a public health crisis. The nature of the decision-making changed: our priority was to shut down the clinic. We made the decision to pull together a GJ presentation asap, in order to shut down the clinic; we would execute warrants the same day, review patients charts, and decide whether and how to proceed with a superceding indictment. We selected one patient, Michael Cornetta, to be the subject of the first GJ presentation. He had suffered multiple near-fatal overdoses while under the doctor’s care, and ultimately died of an overdose within months of leaving the doctor’s practice, at age 41. We interviewed his girlfriend and family members, obtained hospital records, and saw that Dr. Li had received calls from the emergency room, alerting him to at least one of his patient’s overdoses. We interviewed the doctors who treated the patient in the ER – it turned out he was a frequent flier. Based on what we learned – he was an obvious drug addict with no medical conditions, and given the notice provided to Dr. Li by the ER physicians, we decided we would use this patient’s case to indict the doctor, shut down the clinic and obtain search warrants on his office and home.
  16. In November 2011, a GJ voted to indict Dr. Li on charges relating to Michael Cornetta: CSPCS and Reckless Endangerment in the Second Degree. We obtained an arrest warrant, and based on the testimony of informants, we secured search warrants for Dr. Li’s office and home. Medical records: we knew there would be records for many more patients than the ones for whom we had any measure of probable cause to examine. So we drafted a warrant that allows us to seize and secure all records, but review only a few dozen – and we specifically laid out probable cause for each of those, in the form of information about notice to the defendant of drug addiction or overdoses, surveillance, or any other evidence available to us. The search warrant at Dr. Li’s office resulted in the seizure of more than 1,200 handwritten patient charts, each 20 pages long, on average. Upon examination of the set authorized by the search warrant, we applied to the court for further authorization to review the remainder. With that third search warrant, we undertook a review of every chart. Arduous does not come close to describing the process of reading every chart, deciphering medical abbreviations and symbols in typical doctor handwriting, and slowly filtering the files and patients until we had identified a group of approximately 40 or 50 where we felt the conduct had been egregious. How did we do that? We looked for a few things: Any record of overdoses, fatal or non-fatal Records of any communications from family members, loved ones or other doctors, warning Dr. Li of the risk his presrciptions presented Clear signs of patient addiction (could be a particularly gaunt face in a photo, with no record of serious disease, or indications of unreliability such as claiming lost prescriptions or frequent trips requiring several months’ supplies) This winnowing process involved countless more interviews. One very rewarding part of this work: meeting several patients, in their twenties, who said that if the clinic hadn’t shut down, they never would have sought treatment.
  17. This was an example of a letter we found, which led us to contact the patient and his family. Initially, we heard that this patient was dead – fortunately, he had only suffered a non-fatal overdose, his family intervened, and he stopped seeing the doctor. The patient ultimately testified at trial, and Dr. Li was convicted of having sold him prescriptions.
  18. This patient was not so lucky. After her father and brother sent this letter to Dr. Li, the father met with the Dr and pleaded with him in person to stop prescribing. But the doctor continued. This patient suffered multiple severe non-fatal overdoses, is currently on high doses of methadone, lives in her parents’ basement and requires constant care. Her liver also has been severely impaired by the acetaminophen in percocet, which she received for years and in large doses from Dr. Li. Dr. Li was convicted at trial for having sold her prescriptions, and for reckless endangerment in the first degree.
  19. But of course, we knew that not all of those practices were potentially criminal. We began to narrow our focus. Through all this, the doctor’s motive had become abundantly clear: hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash, divided between three bank accounts separate from his business and personal accounts, deposited every week by his wife (sometimes several deposits in one day). Tell story of altered patient files – NJ search warrant materials, wondering why original pages from patient files – this was the benefit of 4 ½ years of doc review in law firm & hours spent reviewing patient files …. Compared & found differences, obtained sharing order, sent to OPMC, learned that dr had been asked to submit files for those patients & that what he had in NJ was difft than what was submitted. Led to charges of Offering False Docs for Filing, convicted at trial.
  20. Of course, we are lawyers – not doctors. We hired a medical expert – a highly-respected pain management specialist from NYU, to review approximately 50 patients files and give his opinion of Dr. Li’s practice. We were vindicated – but also deeply troubled – by the outcome. The expert, who initially had approached the work with some degree of skepticism, wrote strongly-worded reports and gave compelling testimony before the GJ. We finally came to a point where we had identified many decedents, and had an expert prepared to testify that the doctor’s prescriptions were potentially deadly. And we were faced with the most difficult legal question. Could we and should we charge homicide?
  21. Nicholas Rappold is one of our homicide victims. Last prescriptions received three days before found dead. Died of the combined effects of alprazolam and oxycodone. But here’s the catch: while we had a witness ready to testify that NR was taking Li’s Xanax pills all night before he died, we also learned that he bought oxy from a street dealer. We do not know whether he ingested it.
  22. In the end, we charged Man 2 for NR, finding that Li recklessly caused the death of Nicholas Rappold, by being aware of and consciously disregarding a substantial and unjustifiable risk that death would occur, based on a number of factors specific to NR, but also information that Li would have gathered from his clinical practice and other patient deaths in the year leading up to NR’s death. Dr. Li was also indicted for another homicide – J. Haeg – and additional charges relating to 5 other decedents. But for that civilian complaint, none of those deaths would have been explored or explained.
  23. In May 2012, we began presenting evidence to a special grand jury. They heard from 76 witnesses over 6 months. TO give you an idea of their dedication, some members of the Grand Jury even showed up in the days after Hurricane Sandy, because they didn’t have phone service, didn’t know whether we were meeting, and didn’t want to take the chance of missing a session. The superceding indictment charged the following: [slide] Challenges during the special grand jury previewed those we would experience at trial: patients with histories of drug addiction, who would freely admit on the stand that they had lied to Dr. Li in order to obtain prescriptions; challenging medical testimony; detailed reviews of patient charts; putting together coherent narrative to describe this sprawling network of addiction, death and money.