SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 22
© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs | I.Solve.Hunger
Learning from previous initiatives




                                      Start by listening to the people you
                                      aim to help.
                                      Dr. Ernesto Sirolli




                      Reasons for failure: Wrong Assumptions & Generalizations

© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
A conservative scenario shows that we will be able to help   48 farmers
and around   300 connected households throughout the first season.
Deficiencies of today‘s donation model
We need to listen to the people in need before we start acting?




    Give a voice to the people in need to be able to solve multi-facetted problems.


© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
Deficiencies of today‘s donation model
We need to increase identification and transpareny




                                                                                      Donor

                      Donor                 NGO   Beneficiary



                                                                       Beneficiary                NGO




                                                        Traditional donation         A donation system for the
                                                        systems (top-down)           21st century (bottom-up)

                   Who creates solutions?               Few Experts                  Everybody

                   Identification through Involvement   Low                          High

                   Level of transparency                Low                          High

                   Retention rate                       Low                          High




© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
Traditional and online donation growth

      Traditional Donations
       Since 1956 cumulated donations in the US grew every year, except in
        1987 and 2008 when they fell by 2%

      Online Donations



                                                                Donor retention

                            Donation growth


                                                 2010: +20%
                                                 2011: +19.7%


        Source: Giving USA Foundation



       Online Donations have been growing over the last decade
       Recurring donations are more common among online donors

© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
Business Model Overview
Stakeholders and Revenue Streams




       Producing                                 Empowering farmers
       merchandise                               to be self-sufficient




                                                                                              Affiliate
                                                                                             Marketing



                                                                             Advertisement                       Businesses
                                                                   Merchandise
                                                       Donations



                                                                                                     Customers


                                                                         Donors




© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
Scenario Analysis (Pilot Season)
Farm Projects


 On Farm Ponds
                                                                                             Interested
                                    Households    Agricultural   Farms per   Interested in                On Farm
                                                                                             Farms per               Total Costs
                                    per Village     Activity      Village    Participation                 Pond
                                                                                               Village
                                          150                      120                          24                    $2,139.19

                                          300                      240                          48                    $4,278.38
                                                     80%                         20%                       $89,13
                                          450                      360                          72                    $6,417.57

                                          600                      480                          96                    $8,556.76


Farming Starter Pack (Seeds, Fertilisers, Manure)
                                                                                             Interested
                                    Households    Agricultural   Farms per    Interest in                  Starter
                                                                                             Farms per               Total Costs
                                    per Village     Activity      Village    Participation                Package
                                                                                               Village
                                          150                      120                          24                     $744.00

                                          300                      240                          48                    $1,488.00
                                                     80%                         20%                       $31,00
                                          450                      360                          72                    $2,232,00

                                          600                      480                          96                    $2,976.00


© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
Our project rests upon 3 important pillars




                                         Proximity   Adaptability   Scalability

© 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
Demo
64.9% think our concept is revolutionary

                 81.8% would contribute an idea
       72.7% would contribute money
Visit us online:


isolvehunger.org


   facebook.com/isolvehunger




        @isolvehunger

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (9)

27276899 Repelling
27276899 Repelling27276899 Repelling
27276899 Repelling
 
Morocco
MoroccoMorocco
Morocco
 
Democracy Religion Maqdisi
Democracy Religion  MaqdisiDemocracy Religion  Maqdisi
Democracy Religion Maqdisi
 
Shariah
ShariahShariah
Shariah
 
ProjectX Pitch
ProjectX PitchProjectX Pitch
ProjectX Pitch
 
Fiqh2
Fiqh2Fiqh2
Fiqh2
 
Is tawheed alhakimmiyya a bidaa
Is tawheed alhakimmiyya a bidaaIs tawheed alhakimmiyya a bidaa
Is tawheed alhakimmiyya a bidaa
 
Why to make content goes viral
Why to make content goes viralWhy to make content goes viral
Why to make content goes viral
 
2013 Betting on a Cure Sponsorship Packages
2013 Betting on a Cure Sponsorship Packages2013 Betting on a Cure Sponsorship Packages
2013 Betting on a Cure Sponsorship Packages
 

The I.Solve.Hunger Project

  • 1. © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs | I.Solve.Hunger
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5. Learning from previous initiatives Start by listening to the people you aim to help. Dr. Ernesto Sirolli Reasons for failure: Wrong Assumptions & Generalizations © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 6. © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 7. © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 8. © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 9. © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 10. © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 11. © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 12. A conservative scenario shows that we will be able to help 48 farmers and around 300 connected households throughout the first season.
  • 13. Deficiencies of today‘s donation model We need to listen to the people in need before we start acting? Give a voice to the people in need to be able to solve multi-facetted problems. © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 14. Deficiencies of today‘s donation model We need to increase identification and transpareny Donor Donor NGO Beneficiary Beneficiary NGO Traditional donation A donation system for the systems (top-down) 21st century (bottom-up) Who creates solutions? Few Experts Everybody Identification through Involvement Low High Level of transparency Low High Retention rate Low High © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 15. Traditional and online donation growth Traditional Donations  Since 1956 cumulated donations in the US grew every year, except in 1987 and 2008 when they fell by 2% Online Donations Donor retention Donation growth 2010: +20% 2011: +19.7% Source: Giving USA Foundation  Online Donations have been growing over the last decade  Recurring donations are more common among online donors © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 16. Business Model Overview Stakeholders and Revenue Streams Producing Empowering farmers merchandise to be self-sufficient Affiliate Marketing Advertisement Businesses Merchandise Donations Customers Donors © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 17.
  • 18. Scenario Analysis (Pilot Season) Farm Projects On Farm Ponds Interested Households Agricultural Farms per Interested in On Farm Farms per Total Costs per Village Activity Village Participation Pond Village 150 120 24 $2,139.19 300 240 48 $4,278.38 80% 20% $89,13 450 360 72 $6,417.57 600 480 96 $8,556.76 Farming Starter Pack (Seeds, Fertilisers, Manure) Interested Households Agricultural Farms per Interest in Starter Farms per Total Costs per Village Activity Village Participation Package Village 150 120 24 $744.00 300 240 48 $1,488.00 80% 20% $31,00 450 360 72 $2,232,00 600 480 96 $2,976.00 © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 19. Our project rests upon 3 important pillars Proximity Adaptability Scalability © 2012 Meirman, Albus, Cruz, Szymczyk, Verwijs
  • 20. Demo
  • 21. 64.9% think our concept is revolutionary 81.8% would contribute an idea 72.7% would contribute money
  • 22. Visit us online: isolvehunger.org facebook.com/isolvehunger @isolvehunger

Editor's Notes

  1. These things are important puzzle pieces but seen individually they neglect the complexity of the issue.
  2. As strange as it may sound these guys here are the other part of the problem.Some of the causes for hunger are specific to countries, regions or even individual farmers. To make the biggest impact possible, a holistic solution needs to tackle this kind of complexity.
  3. DNA example
  4. ADD LOGO
  5. HIGHER RESOLUTION?
  6. By the way people have already complained because this form didn’t work. So, let me tell you, it’s is just a mock up. We do accept donations, but only in cash ;)
  7. $75,600 are one time costs to set up the equipment we need on site.
  8. Whatever happens today please go to the website