The Gameplay called War and The Truth of It

1. The Gameplay Called War
By Khandaker Sakib Farhad
According to history, every war starts in the name of religion and ends up making a great business
deal. For continuing the process successfully throughout every generation, we are always meant to
believe that the end of days is coming at any possible time. From my belief, the function of war is to
influence vision and culture from one society to the next. First strategy of war is to infiltrate the
society that is about to be attacked from the inside, then wait for the suitable time for attacking from
within and outside. In such a two sided attack it can be certain that the war will be won by the
attacking side as they wish others to see it fit. Yes, as the winning side wishes others to see it fit as in
some cases a seemingly peaceful retreat can also turn out to be a good win and the smaller side which
is thought to be won will in many cases face damage in the long run. Because in any battle the one
invading will always result in a winning side as wars are fought for conquering lands and results in
destroying property. So, the invader even after retreating will destroy most of the property causing
poverty, hunger, death to the seemingly winning side. Then religious institutes, charitable institutes,
health and safety institutes are introduced to the defeated society to gain trust of the invasive society
or any other counter invasive society. The only difference is that there has only been a shift of hand. It
is not necessary to believe in the religion of the invasive society, but to know that they also pose good
faith. Then, the business, infrastructure development and culture of the invasive society is introduced
to the defeated society or smaller society to make them accustomed with the new culture.
Now, when it comes to killing a human being is it really that necessary in the name of Justice or race.
No, it is not. I am not saying that considering the aspect of saving the innocent or killing the racists.
Every racist is in other words terrorist with only one difference which is some are minority racist and
some are majority racist based on religion, ethnicity, culture, politics etc. When it comes to
considering the psychology of a human being from a neutral point of view, it is actually not necessary
to kill such a species which is literally ready to make any possible deal to survive and no one is willing
to kill it to consume it. So, from that point of view though the media and even religion portrays killing
as justified for war but I personally find it unnecessary. The whole world has become automated
starting from flying drones capable of causing any sort of unmanned attack and automated remote
controlled war machines can also be made for causing any sort of lethal blow. So, killing humans
which causes no loss but mostly panic is not necessary as the basic purpose of war is destroying
business and conquering lands not destroying lives.
However, the end of days might eventually come one day, but it is never necessary to rage war
amongst each other for that. Currently, this is what has been happening throughout the ages after
every 5 to 10 years in the name of religion, terrorism, political suppression, ideological difference etc.
We are so accustomed with the term war that we use it as Debate, corporate war, political war, union
war, local fight, playground fight, movie war, and in every way possible. Finally, as long as we are
together as a united world we can always hope that the inevitable will not happen for having peace
amongst each other and we are so insignificant that we can face doom at any time possible like the
time of the dinosaurs.