Monthly report on de international sales september 2015WebInterpret SAS
Im Zuge der Erarbeitung dieser internationalen Marktanalyse wollten wir drei Fragen beantworten, die sich jeder deutsche Onlinehändler stellen sollte:
Was sind die profitabelsten ausländischen Märkte für deutsche Onlinehändler?
Was sind die profitabelsten Artikelkategorien deutscher internationaler Onlinehändler?
Was ist das Cross Border Trade Potential deutscher internationaler Onlinehändler?
Facebook-Benutzer scannen mit Ihren Augen die Timeline nach interessanten Informationen. Umso wichtiger ist es mit den richtigen Methoden zu posten. Facebook entscheidet selbst durch einen Algorithmus wie viele Fans und wie oft ein Post angezeigt wird. Unsere Tipps zeigen dazu ebenfalls ein paar Lösungen. Mehr Infos und Tipps? Besuche uns auf Facebook: www.facebook.com/CleverSocial
Präsentation vom 11. 01. 2010 – Übersicht über Formulare und ihre Verwendung. Zusammen mit den gedruckten Unterlagen: http://www.slideshare.net/noelboss/documents
Monthly report on de international sales september 2015WebInterpret SAS
Im Zuge der Erarbeitung dieser internationalen Marktanalyse wollten wir drei Fragen beantworten, die sich jeder deutsche Onlinehändler stellen sollte:
Was sind die profitabelsten ausländischen Märkte für deutsche Onlinehändler?
Was sind die profitabelsten Artikelkategorien deutscher internationaler Onlinehändler?
Was ist das Cross Border Trade Potential deutscher internationaler Onlinehändler?
Facebook-Benutzer scannen mit Ihren Augen die Timeline nach interessanten Informationen. Umso wichtiger ist es mit den richtigen Methoden zu posten. Facebook entscheidet selbst durch einen Algorithmus wie viele Fans und wie oft ein Post angezeigt wird. Unsere Tipps zeigen dazu ebenfalls ein paar Lösungen. Mehr Infos und Tipps? Besuche uns auf Facebook: www.facebook.com/CleverSocial
Präsentation vom 11. 01. 2010 – Übersicht über Formulare und ihre Verwendung. Zusammen mit den gedruckten Unterlagen: http://www.slideshare.net/noelboss/documents
Webinar: 10 Zutaten für Ihre Weihnachtskampagneoptivo GmbH
optivo E-Mail-Marketing Consultants Nadine Lauenstein und Andreas Endter führen am 14.10.2013 durch das Webinar "10 Zutaten für Ihre Weihnachtskampagne"
This document reports an error in processing a command. The error is identified as a "stackunderflow" which occurs when the stack has been underflowed or emptied by the offending command "~". The stack is listed but is empty.
The document discusses the concept of reintermediation replacing mechanisms of transparency in open science. Specifically, it argues that traditional gatekeepers of science communication like journalists are becoming endangered as new intermediaries like corporate publishers, science advocacy groups, and press release repositories bypass them. This disintermediation raises questions about responsibilities and work ethics that the concept of reintermediation seeks to address through new models of science communication that replace traditional gatekeepers and sequences of information flow.
With regard to evolution, creatures who refuse to learn deserve extinction. What about our own profession? Do we maybe ‘refuse to learn’ from digitisation that it is not just work practices and business models which are being transformed? Does the post-truth era question the very function of ‘journalists’ as dedicated intermediaries? What is it that enables or prevents us from adapting to the changing media environments?
This keynote at the European Science Journalism Conference 2017 introduced a new model of “Disintermediation in Science Communication”. The concept which was originally coined in economics, describes the structural loss of journalists as intermediaries in the knowledge-creation and -transfer processes. The research is based on the world’s first full-text content analysis of every science press release published digitally in German academia.
The document describes a Science Debate format for engaging citizens in discussions about controversial science and technology topics. Science Debates bring together scientific experts, political representatives, non-governmental organizations, and citizens to discuss issues and find solutions. They aim to ensure public input shapes decisions, not just informs them. An example debate topic described is deforestation in the Amazon and its impact on endangered species. Stakeholders present arguments on both sides, such as government officials noting monitoring efforts while scientists describe species loss. The document advocates applying the format to topics in Brazil, like cable cars in Rio favelas, and offers collaboration to help develop Science Debates.
Germany has a long history of public engagement with science. The world's first science center, Urania in Berlin, was established in 1888 as a stage for public scientists to engage in societal debate and scientific demonstrations. Founding fathers like Alexander von Humboldt and Werner von Siemens helped establish early traditions of public science communication. In 1929, the German Association for Science and Technology Publishing was formed, likely the first science journalists association worldwide. Heinz Haber was one of the forefathers of science journalism in Germany, producing popular science shows for television and authoring many best-selling books on science topics.
Webinar: 10 Zutaten für Ihre Weihnachtskampagneoptivo GmbH
optivo E-Mail-Marketing Consultants Nadine Lauenstein und Andreas Endter führen am 14.10.2013 durch das Webinar "10 Zutaten für Ihre Weihnachtskampagne"
This document reports an error in processing a command. The error is identified as a "stackunderflow" which occurs when the stack has been underflowed or emptied by the offending command "~". The stack is listed but is empty.
The document discusses the concept of reintermediation replacing mechanisms of transparency in open science. Specifically, it argues that traditional gatekeepers of science communication like journalists are becoming endangered as new intermediaries like corporate publishers, science advocacy groups, and press release repositories bypass them. This disintermediation raises questions about responsibilities and work ethics that the concept of reintermediation seeks to address through new models of science communication that replace traditional gatekeepers and sequences of information flow.
With regard to evolution, creatures who refuse to learn deserve extinction. What about our own profession? Do we maybe ‘refuse to learn’ from digitisation that it is not just work practices and business models which are being transformed? Does the post-truth era question the very function of ‘journalists’ as dedicated intermediaries? What is it that enables or prevents us from adapting to the changing media environments?
This keynote at the European Science Journalism Conference 2017 introduced a new model of “Disintermediation in Science Communication”. The concept which was originally coined in economics, describes the structural loss of journalists as intermediaries in the knowledge-creation and -transfer processes. The research is based on the world’s first full-text content analysis of every science press release published digitally in German academia.
The document describes a Science Debate format for engaging citizens in discussions about controversial science and technology topics. Science Debates bring together scientific experts, political representatives, non-governmental organizations, and citizens to discuss issues and find solutions. They aim to ensure public input shapes decisions, not just informs them. An example debate topic described is deforestation in the Amazon and its impact on endangered species. Stakeholders present arguments on both sides, such as government officials noting monitoring efforts while scientists describe species loss. The document advocates applying the format to topics in Brazil, like cable cars in Rio favelas, and offers collaboration to help develop Science Debates.
Germany has a long history of public engagement with science. The world's first science center, Urania in Berlin, was established in 1888 as a stage for public scientists to engage in societal debate and scientific demonstrations. Founding fathers like Alexander von Humboldt and Werner von Siemens helped establish early traditions of public science communication. In 1929, the German Association for Science and Technology Publishing was formed, likely the first science journalists association worldwide. Heinz Haber was one of the forefathers of science journalism in Germany, producing popular science shows for television and authoring many best-selling books on science topics.
The document summarizes the findings of a survey and expert panel discussion on trends and challenges in science and innovation communication in Germany. The survey involved science journalists, PR managers, scientists, and communication researchers. It found that freelance journalists are under increasing financial pressure. It also found that acquiring public funding for science centers and exhibitions has become more difficult. The expert panel further discussed the issues of reaching different target audiences and how the economic crisis has impacted the structural challenges already facing science media.
This document discusses professionalism and quality of health information online. It notes that health information on the internet needs to be correct, useful, and neutral. It also discusses measuring objectivity through automated metrics and accrediting professionalism through certificates. Additionally, it addresses assessing quality through peer-reviewed journalism and correcting false information through peer-reviewed science. The document concludes by discussing issues management in real-time through social networks.
Entgegen dem veralteten Verständnis der passiven Medienkonsumenten haben die sozialen Medienplattformen im Internet die Wissenschaftskommunikation entscheidend verändert. Moderierte Online-Debatten haben das Potenzial, die so genannten Prosumenten am Diskurs über kontroverse bzw. potentiell gefährliche Technologieentwicklungen zu beteiligen. Diese Transparenz könnte Vertrauen in die Wissenschaft fördern und die Gesellschaft auf Veränderungen vorbereiten. Aufgrund der hohen Komplexität wissenschaftlicher Themen, muss diese Entwicklung aber auch mit neuen Formen der Visualisierung und der Wissensvermittlung einhergehen.
The document discusses the need to move from a model of science communication focused on dissemination of information to the public, to a model of deliberation and collaboration. It notes the status quo involves mainly informing the public of what institutions are doing, but that "prosumers" now expect a dialogue. It suggests using online tools and media to facilitate public discussion and debate around complex science and technology issues in a transparent way, in order to build trust and foster readiness for change.
Challenges / Trends / Solutions for Science and Innovation CommunicationProf. Alexander Gerber
1.) Survey
- Standardised, written, anonymised
- Six groups of interviewees in the field of science and innovation communication: 326 science journalists and PR managers, scientists and communication researchers
2. ) Delphi Study
75 renowned experts, researchers and practitioners discuss the findings and challenges as documented in the survey.
Prognoses und scenarios for future developments will lead to roadmaps and strategy recommendations
So-called “prosumers” in today’s web 2.0 mindset will increasingly expect companies as well as research institutions to open up for a true dialogue with the public. The demand for transparency and a direct, unmediated discourse is fundamentally changing the way enterprises and organizations communicate about science and innovation. As much as social media might shake the business foundations of the publishing industry to the core and as much as it may alter journalism as we know it, there is also a high potential of bringing the society back into science and innovation. Especially when it comes to potentially controversial technological developments, the right public discourse may create transparency and thus build up trust in innovation, promote general readiness for technological change and accordingly accelerate the diffusion of new products in the market. Since media images of public debates tend to be afflicted by a high degree of complexity, new visualization methods and new journalistic skills are needed. Therefore the author suggests an interaction model for future innovation communication that addresses the demand for public discourse in all four stages of the value chain: science, ideation, innovation and diffusion.
This document discusses the changing role of media in covering innovation, science, and technology. It notes that coverage encompasses more than just public understanding of science, including areas like science journalism, tech journalism, and innovation journalism. The media plays a role in fostering readiness for technological change and knowledge transfer. Fundamental changes are taking place in science communication due to factors like the growth of science blogs and open access publishing, which are transforming how information and interaction about innovation and science are shared.