Normaizatul Hanissa binti Hamdan
Amirah binti Basir
 Auger Electron Spectroscopy(AES) was developed in the late 1960’s.
 Its name was derived from the Auger effect that is first observed by Pierre Auger,
a French physicist in the late 1920’s.
 It is a surface specific technique utilizing the emission of low energy electrons in
the Auger process and is one of the most commonly employed surface analytical
techniques for determining the composition of the surface layers of a sample.
 The Auger Effect is named after its discoverer, Pierre Auger, who observed a
tertiary effect while studying photoemission processes in the 1920s. Auger
electrons are emitted at discrete energies that allow the atom of origin to be
identified.
 The idea of using electron-stimulated Auger signals for surface analysis was first
suggested in 1953 by J. J. Lander.
 The technique became practical for surface analysis after Larry Harris in 1967
demonstrated the use of differentiation to enhance the Auger signals.
 Today Auger electron spectroscopy is a powerful surface analytical tool to probe
surfaces, thin films, and interfaces.
 This utility arises from the combination of surface specificity (0.5 to 10 nm), good
spatial surface resolution (as good as 10 nm), periodic table coverage (except
hydrogen and helium), and reasonable sensitivity (100 ppm for most elements).
 Auger spectroscopy can be considered as involving three basic steps:
1. Atomic ionization (by removal of a core electron)
2. Electron emission (the Auger process)
3. Analysis of the emitted Auger electrons
 The last stage is simply a technical problem of detecting charged particles with
high sensitivity, with the additional requirement that the kinetic energies of the
emitted electrons must be determined.
Three symbol in transition label are three energy level
involved in transition
Transition label
K, L1, L2
1. Ionization
 Initiated by creation of a core hole-typically
exposing the sample to a high energy fine focus
electron beam (typically having primary energy in
the range 2-10 keV)
 In diagram shown, ionization occur by removal of a
K-shell electron, and this will lead to creating holes
in the inner shell of electron.
 The vacancy must be refilled by an electron from a
higher energy level.
2. Relaxation and Auger Emission
 The ionized atom that remains after the removal of
the core hole electron is in a highly excited and will
relax to lower ground state through X-ray
fluorescence and Auger emission (which we will only
discuss)
 When higher energy electron fills the hole, the energy
released is transferred to neighbour electron in outer
orbit electron.
 That electron has sufficient energy to overcome the
binding energy and work function to be ejected with
characteristics kinetic energy.
3. Analysis of emitted Auger electrons
 The output of AES is referred to as an Auger spectrum. This spectrum would show
peaks at Auger electron energy levels corresponding to the atoms from which the
auger electrons were released.
 The energies of Auger transitions are specific to each element and its chemical
environment, so that its Auger spectrum acts as an elemental “fingerprint”, which
can be compared to a catalogue of known spectra.
 Each element typically has one or more “characteristic peaks” which can be used
to detect its presence in complex spectra, e.g. when organic molecules are
deposited on a surface, or when testing a surface for possible contamination.
• Figure shown in the Auger spectrum
of a Mo sample contaminated by O
and C. The primary beam was 3 keV
and the characteristics peak of Mo
and main contamination are shown.
• Due to the high linear background
signal, the Auger spectrum is
usually represented as a
differentiated spectrum, i.e.
𝑑𝑁
𝑑𝐸
vs. E.
• Due to the fact that the differential
of a peak (i.e. its slope) will be
represented as first a negative and
then positive double peak, it is usual
to refer only to the negative peak’s
position.
Figure 1: Direct spectrum Figure 2: Differentiated spectrum
that enhances AES features and
remove background signal
 The Auger electron has an energy given by
𝐸𝐴𝑢𝑔𝑒𝑟 = 𝐸𝑘 − 𝐸𝐿1 − 𝐸𝐿2,3 − ∅
Where Ek, EL1, and EL2,3 are the binding energies of K1, L1 and L2,3 of electron
orbits of the atom. Ø is the work function.

Electron source
and opticalcolumn
•To focus the
electron beam
from an electron
source onto the
specimen surface
by a suitable
optical column.
Ion optical column
•Cleaning the
sample surface.
•Sputtering for
depth profiling.
Electron energy
analyzer
•Measure the
number of ejected
electrons(N) as a
function of
electron energy
(E).
•Should have high
transmission
efficiency,
compact size and
ease of use of
cylindrical mirror
analyzer.
Secondary electron
detector and a
pulse counter
•Electrons exiting
the analyzer and
arrived at the
detector are
amplified and
counted by an
electron
multiplier.
•Pulse counting
measure the
electron intensity
Computer control
and data display
systems
•Setting up
conditions for
analysis
•Acquiring and
storing data
efficiently
•Processing data
•Display results in
form of spectra
1) JAMP-9510F Auger Microprobe by JOEL USA Inc.
2) XPS/HAXPES Scanning Microprobe by Physical Electronics, Inc in USA.
3) PHOIBOS ARPES Analyzer by SPECSGROUP in Berlin, Germany.
4) In situ Real Time AugerProbe by STAIBS INSTRUMENTS GmbH (EUROPE AND ASIA)
OR STAIB INSTRUMENTS, Inc (North and South America).
Qualitative analysis
Quantitative analysis
Chemical information
Auger Depth Profiling
Auger Images and Linescans
Research and Industry
 Obtained a survey spectrum with relatively modest resolution in a fairly short
time.
 Most elements have significant Auger transition in the range of energy between 0
eV to 1000 eV.
 Auger electron with energies greater than 1000 eV are less-surface sensitive
because these electrons have longer inelastic mean free paths.
 Determine the chemical composition of solid surfaces by calculating the Auger
peak intensity measurement.
 Peak intensitites are characterized by the peak-to –peak heights.
 Method of Auger quantification:
1. first principles Auger intensity calculation
2. standards of known composition
3. elemental relative intensity factor
 Changes in chemical state can be deduced from changes in Auger peak positions,
intensities, and shapes.
 However, the process is challenging because Auger process involves three energy
levels.
 More detailed electronic structure information such as hybridization, electron
delocalization, screening effects may be obtained from quantitative spectral
lineshape analysis.
 One of four modes of Auger operation (point analysis, line scan and surface
imaging is the other three modes)
 Process of obtaining the chemical composition as a function of depth below the
surface.
 By changing the geometry of the experiment as the depth analysis depends on the
emission angle of the Auger electron.
 Category of this method:
1. Non-destructive,
2. Sputtering by noble gas ions
3. Mechanical sectioning.
 Scanning Auger microscope contains a secondary electron detector (SED) for
performing secondary electron microscopy (SEM) imaging that provide surface
topographic information.
 The imaging provides surface topographic by taking account the background
information and enhance chemical information when performing scanning Auger
electron spectroscopy.
 AES depth profiling used for monitoring chemical composition. (detecting small
defects – less than 500Amstrongthat play critical role in small semiconductor
devices.
 It is used to study ceramic thin film materials. To characterize thin films that has
potential applications in electro-optic devices, pyroelectric and micro
electromechanical devices.
 Useful for studying microscopic inclusion (chemical inhomogenities) present in
protective thin film that inhibit the corrosion of stainless steel.

Instrumentation presentation - Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

  • 1.
    Normaizatul Hanissa bintiHamdan Amirah binti Basir
  • 2.
     Auger ElectronSpectroscopy(AES) was developed in the late 1960’s.  Its name was derived from the Auger effect that is first observed by Pierre Auger, a French physicist in the late 1920’s.  It is a surface specific technique utilizing the emission of low energy electrons in the Auger process and is one of the most commonly employed surface analytical techniques for determining the composition of the surface layers of a sample.
  • 3.
     The AugerEffect is named after its discoverer, Pierre Auger, who observed a tertiary effect while studying photoemission processes in the 1920s. Auger electrons are emitted at discrete energies that allow the atom of origin to be identified.  The idea of using electron-stimulated Auger signals for surface analysis was first suggested in 1953 by J. J. Lander.  The technique became practical for surface analysis after Larry Harris in 1967 demonstrated the use of differentiation to enhance the Auger signals.  Today Auger electron spectroscopy is a powerful surface analytical tool to probe surfaces, thin films, and interfaces.  This utility arises from the combination of surface specificity (0.5 to 10 nm), good spatial surface resolution (as good as 10 nm), periodic table coverage (except hydrogen and helium), and reasonable sensitivity (100 ppm for most elements).
  • 4.
     Auger spectroscopycan be considered as involving three basic steps: 1. Atomic ionization (by removal of a core electron) 2. Electron emission (the Auger process) 3. Analysis of the emitted Auger electrons  The last stage is simply a technical problem of detecting charged particles with high sensitivity, with the additional requirement that the kinetic energies of the emitted electrons must be determined.
  • 5.
    Three symbol intransition label are three energy level involved in transition Transition label K, L1, L2
  • 6.
    1. Ionization  Initiatedby creation of a core hole-typically exposing the sample to a high energy fine focus electron beam (typically having primary energy in the range 2-10 keV)  In diagram shown, ionization occur by removal of a K-shell electron, and this will lead to creating holes in the inner shell of electron.  The vacancy must be refilled by an electron from a higher energy level.
  • 7.
    2. Relaxation andAuger Emission  The ionized atom that remains after the removal of the core hole electron is in a highly excited and will relax to lower ground state through X-ray fluorescence and Auger emission (which we will only discuss)  When higher energy electron fills the hole, the energy released is transferred to neighbour electron in outer orbit electron.  That electron has sufficient energy to overcome the binding energy and work function to be ejected with characteristics kinetic energy.
  • 8.
    3. Analysis ofemitted Auger electrons  The output of AES is referred to as an Auger spectrum. This spectrum would show peaks at Auger electron energy levels corresponding to the atoms from which the auger electrons were released.  The energies of Auger transitions are specific to each element and its chemical environment, so that its Auger spectrum acts as an elemental “fingerprint”, which can be compared to a catalogue of known spectra.  Each element typically has one or more “characteristic peaks” which can be used to detect its presence in complex spectra, e.g. when organic molecules are deposited on a surface, or when testing a surface for possible contamination.
  • 9.
    • Figure shownin the Auger spectrum of a Mo sample contaminated by O and C. The primary beam was 3 keV and the characteristics peak of Mo and main contamination are shown. • Due to the high linear background signal, the Auger spectrum is usually represented as a differentiated spectrum, i.e. 𝑑𝑁 𝑑𝐸 vs. E. • Due to the fact that the differential of a peak (i.e. its slope) will be represented as first a negative and then positive double peak, it is usual to refer only to the negative peak’s position.
  • 10.
    Figure 1: Directspectrum Figure 2: Differentiated spectrum that enhances AES features and remove background signal
  • 11.
     The Augerelectron has an energy given by 𝐸𝐴𝑢𝑔𝑒𝑟 = 𝐸𝑘 − 𝐸𝐿1 − 𝐸𝐿2,3 − ∅ Where Ek, EL1, and EL2,3 are the binding energies of K1, L1 and L2,3 of electron orbits of the atom. Ø is the work function.
  • 12.
  • 14.
    Electron source and opticalcolumn •Tofocus the electron beam from an electron source onto the specimen surface by a suitable optical column. Ion optical column •Cleaning the sample surface. •Sputtering for depth profiling. Electron energy analyzer •Measure the number of ejected electrons(N) as a function of electron energy (E). •Should have high transmission efficiency, compact size and ease of use of cylindrical mirror analyzer. Secondary electron detector and a pulse counter •Electrons exiting the analyzer and arrived at the detector are amplified and counted by an electron multiplier. •Pulse counting measure the electron intensity Computer control and data display systems •Setting up conditions for analysis •Acquiring and storing data efficiently •Processing data •Display results in form of spectra
  • 15.
    1) JAMP-9510F AugerMicroprobe by JOEL USA Inc. 2) XPS/HAXPES Scanning Microprobe by Physical Electronics, Inc in USA. 3) PHOIBOS ARPES Analyzer by SPECSGROUP in Berlin, Germany. 4) In situ Real Time AugerProbe by STAIBS INSTRUMENTS GmbH (EUROPE AND ASIA) OR STAIB INSTRUMENTS, Inc (North and South America).
  • 16.
    Qualitative analysis Quantitative analysis Chemicalinformation Auger Depth Profiling Auger Images and Linescans Research and Industry
  • 17.
     Obtained asurvey spectrum with relatively modest resolution in a fairly short time.  Most elements have significant Auger transition in the range of energy between 0 eV to 1000 eV.  Auger electron with energies greater than 1000 eV are less-surface sensitive because these electrons have longer inelastic mean free paths.
  • 18.
     Determine thechemical composition of solid surfaces by calculating the Auger peak intensity measurement.  Peak intensitites are characterized by the peak-to –peak heights.  Method of Auger quantification: 1. first principles Auger intensity calculation 2. standards of known composition 3. elemental relative intensity factor
  • 19.
     Changes inchemical state can be deduced from changes in Auger peak positions, intensities, and shapes.  However, the process is challenging because Auger process involves three energy levels.  More detailed electronic structure information such as hybridization, electron delocalization, screening effects may be obtained from quantitative spectral lineshape analysis.
  • 20.
     One offour modes of Auger operation (point analysis, line scan and surface imaging is the other three modes)  Process of obtaining the chemical composition as a function of depth below the surface.  By changing the geometry of the experiment as the depth analysis depends on the emission angle of the Auger electron.  Category of this method: 1. Non-destructive, 2. Sputtering by noble gas ions 3. Mechanical sectioning.
  • 21.
     Scanning Augermicroscope contains a secondary electron detector (SED) for performing secondary electron microscopy (SEM) imaging that provide surface topographic information.  The imaging provides surface topographic by taking account the background information and enhance chemical information when performing scanning Auger electron spectroscopy.
  • 22.
     AES depthprofiling used for monitoring chemical composition. (detecting small defects – less than 500Amstrongthat play critical role in small semiconductor devices.  It is used to study ceramic thin film materials. To characterize thin films that has potential applications in electro-optic devices, pyroelectric and micro electromechanical devices.  Useful for studying microscopic inclusion (chemical inhomogenities) present in protective thin film that inhibit the corrosion of stainless steel.