This review summarizes Martin Scorsese's film Raging Bull. It explores how the film depicts violence as both repulsive and fascinating. It focuses on Jake LaMotta, a boxer whose aggressive masculinity and sexual insecurity lead to paranoia and abuse of his wife. Though LaMotta's psychology is not fully explained, the film immerses the viewer in his volatile world through techniques like silent internal monologues. It highlights the complex tones in the boxing sequences, showing LaMotta using the ring to express his damaged ego and find absolution. The review praises De Niro's unblinking portrayal of LaMotta as his body and career decline in the film's later scenes.
Slides for guest lecture on Golden Age of comics for Eng 3370 http://libguides.uta.edu/comics/3370 with @StephanieNNoell on 4/9/2014
CC license applied for any original content.
Slides for guest lecture on Golden Age of comics for Eng 3370 http://libguides.uta.edu/comics/3370 with @StephanieNNoell on 4/9/2014
CC license applied for any original content.
Unveiling Paul Haggis Shaping Cinema Through Diversity. .pdfkenid14983
Paul Haggis is undoubtedly a visionary filmmaker whose work has not only shaped cinema but has also pushed boundaries when it comes to diversity and representation within the industry. From his thought-provoking scripts to his engaging directorial style, Haggis has become a prominent figure in the world of film.
At Digidev, we are working to be the leader in interactive streaming platforms of choice by smart device users worldwide.
Our goal is to become the ultimate distribution service of entertainment content. The Digidev application will offer the next generation television highway for users to discover and engage in a variety of content. While also providing a fresh and
innovative approach towards advertainment with vast revenue opportunities. Designed and developed by Joe Q. Bretz
Barbie Movie Review - The Astras.pdffffftheastras43
Barbie Movie Review has gotten brilliant surveys for its fun and creative story. Coordinated by Greta Gerwig, it stars Margot Robbie as Barbie and Ryan Gosling as Insight. Critics adore its perky humor, dynamic visuals, and intelligent take on the notorious doll's world. It's lauded for being engaging for both kids and grown-ups. The Astras profoundly prescribes observing the Barbie Review for a delightful and colorful cinematic involvement.https://theastras.com/hca-member-gradebooks/hca-gradebook-barbie/
Experience the thrill of Progressive Puzzle Adventures, like Scavenger Hunt Games and Escape Room Activities combined Solve Treasure Hunt Puzzles online.
Meet Dinah Mattingly – Larry Bird’s Partner in Life and Loveget joys
Get an intimate look at Dinah Mattingly’s life alongside NBA icon Larry Bird. From their humble beginnings to their life today, discover the love and partnership that have defined their relationship.
Matt Rife Cancels Shows Due to Health Concerns, Reschedules Tour Dates.pdfAzura Everhart
Matt Rife's comedy tour took an unexpected turn. He had to cancel his Bloomington show due to a last-minute medical emergency. Fans in Chicago will also have to wait a bit longer for their laughs, as his shows there are postponed. Rife apologized and assured fans he'd be back on stage soon.
https://www.theurbancrews.com/celeb/matt-rife-cancels-bloomington-show/
Tom Selleck Net Worth: A Comprehensive Analysisgreendigital
Over several decades, Tom Selleck, a name synonymous with charisma. From his iconic role as Thomas Magnum in the television series "Magnum, P.I." to his enduring presence in "Blue Bloods," Selleck has captivated audiences with his versatility and charm. As a result, "Tom Selleck net worth" has become a topic of great interest among fans. and financial enthusiasts alike. This article delves deep into Tom Selleck's wealth, exploring his career, assets, endorsements. and business ventures that contribute to his impressive economic standing.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Early Life and Career Beginnings
The Foundation of Tom Selleck's Wealth
Born on January 29, 1945, in Detroit, Michigan, Tom Selleck grew up in Sherman Oaks, California. His journey towards building a large net worth began with humble origins. , Selleck pursued a business administration degree at the University of Southern California (USC) on a basketball scholarship. But, his interest shifted towards acting. leading him to study at the Hills Playhouse under Milton Katselas.
Minor roles in television and films marked Selleck's early career. He appeared in commercials and took on small parts in T.V. series such as "The Dating Game" and "Lancer." These initial steps, although modest. laid the groundwork for his future success and the growth of Tom Selleck net worth. Breakthrough with "Magnum, P.I."
The Role that Defined Tom Selleck's Career
Tom Selleck's breakthrough came with the role of Thomas Magnum in the CBS television series "Magnum, P.I." (1980-1988). This role made him a household name and boosted his net worth. The series' popularity resulted in Selleck earning large salaries. leading to financial stability and increased recognition in Hollywood.
"Magnum P.I." garnered high ratings and critical acclaim during its run. Selleck's portrayal of the charming and resourceful private investigator resonated with audiences. making him one of the most beloved television actors of the 1980s. The success of "Magnum P.I." played a pivotal role in shaping Tom Selleck net worth, establishing him as a major star.
Film Career and Diversification
Expanding Tom Selleck's Financial Portfolio
While "Magnum, P.I." was a cornerstone of Selleck's career, he did not limit himself to television. He ventured into films, further enhancing Tom Selleck net worth. His filmography includes notable movies such as "Three Men and a Baby" (1987). which became the highest-grossing film of the year, and its sequel, "Three Men and a Little Lady" (1990). These box office successes contributed to his wealth.
Selleck's versatility allowed him to transition between genres. from comedies like "Mr. Baseball" (1992) to westerns such as "Quigley Down Under" (1990). This diversification showcased his acting range. and provided many income streams, reinforcing Tom Selleck net worth.
Television Resurgence with "Blue Bloods"
Sustaining Wealth through Consistent Success
In 2010, Tom Selleck began starring as Frank Reagan i
Modern Radio Frequency Access Control Systems: The Key to Efficiency and SafetyAITIX LLC
Today's fast-paced environment worries companies of all sizes about efficiency and security. Businesses are constantly looking for new and better solutions to solve their problems, whether it's data security or facility access. RFID for access control technologies have revolutionized this.
240529_Teleprotection Global Market Report 2024.pdfMadhura TBRC
The teleprotection market size has grown
exponentially in recent years. It will grow from
$21.92 billion in 2023 to $28.11 billion in 2024 at a
compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 28.2%. The
teleprotection market size is expected to see
exponential growth in the next few years. It will grow
to $70.77 billion in 2028 at a compound annual
growth rate (CAGR) of 26.0%.
The Unbelievable Tale of Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping: A Riveting Sagagreendigital
Introduction
The notion of Dwayne Johnson kidnapping seems straight out of a Hollywood thriller. Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, known for his larger-than-life persona, immense popularity. and action-packed filmography, is the last person anyone would envision being a victim of kidnapping. Yet, the bizarre and riveting tale of such an incident, filled with twists and turns. has captured the imagination of many. In this article, we delve into the intricate details of this astonishing event. exploring every aspect, from the dramatic rescue operation to the aftermath and the lessons learned.
Follow us on: Pinterest
The Origins of the Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping Saga
Dwayne Johnson: A Brief Background
Before discussing the specifics of the kidnapping. it is crucial to understand who Dwayne Johnson is and why his kidnapping would be so significant. Born May 2, 1972, Dwayne Douglas Johnson is an American actor, producer, businessman. and former professional wrestler. Known by his ring name, "The Rock," he gained fame in the World Wrestling Federation (WWF, now WWE) before transitioning to a successful career in Hollywood.
Johnson's filmography includes blockbuster hits such as "The Fast and the Furious" series, "Jumanji," "Moana," and "San Andreas." His charismatic personality, impressive physique. and action-star status have made him a beloved figure worldwide. Thus, the news of his kidnapping would send shockwaves across the globe.
Setting the Scene: The Day of the Kidnapping
The incident of Dwayne Johnson's kidnapping began on an ordinary day. Johnson was filming his latest high-octane action film set to break box office records. The location was a remote yet scenic area. chosen for its rugged terrain and breathtaking vistas. perfect for the film's climactic scenes.
But, beneath the veneer of normalcy, a sinister plot was unfolding. Unbeknownst to Johnson and his team, a group of criminals had planned his abduction. hoping to leverage his celebrity status for a hefty ransom. The stage was set for an event that would soon dominate worldwide headlines and social media feeds.
The Abduction: Unfolding the Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping
The Moment of Capture
On the day of the kidnapping, everything seemed to be proceeding as usual on set. Johnson and his co-stars and crew were engrossed in shooting a particularly demanding scene. As the day wore on, the production team took a short break. providing the kidnappers with the perfect opportunity to strike.
The abduction was executed with military precision. A group of masked men, armed and organized, infiltrated the set. They created chaos, taking advantage of the confusion to isolate Johnson. Johnson was outnumbered and caught off guard despite his formidable strength and fighting skills. The kidnappers overpowered him, bundled him into a waiting vehicle. and sped away, leaving everyone on set in a state of shock and disbelief.
The Immediate Aftermath
The immediate aftermath of the Dwayne Johnson kidnappin
The Unbelievable Tale of Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping: A Riveting Saga
Slant magazine | film | raging bull
1. Slant Magazine | Film | Raging Bull 4/9/12 12:32 PM
Raging Bull
BY MATTHEW CONNOLLY ON NOVEMBER 2, 2010
**** stars
Film criticism seemingly doesn't get more banal than commenting upon Martin Scorsese's
"fascination" with violence. (Combine it with some extended musings on John Ford's conception of
"masculinity" and you've got a full-proof narcoleptic for cineastes.) Then you re-watch Raging Bull
and you remember that all those cocktail-party bloviations have their roots in one of American
cinema's most complex visions of physical brutality: its communal roots, hypnotic realization, and
corrosive legacy. Scorsese sees the glamorization/moralization of filmic violence as irrevocably
fused together, revulsion and fascination informing one another equally. And just as crucially, he
finds a similar connection between the subjective experiences of those committing violent acts and
the sociological factors that deem those acts acceptable (and often assumed). To watch a Scorsese
brawl or gunfight is to find a director working through all these multifarious ideas and attempting
to get them all on screen—often in the same scene, sometimes in the same frame. Do we feel
nauseous or vindicated when Travis Bickle takes out Harvey Keital's brutal pimp at the end of Taxi
Driver? Are we watching the implosion of a soul in Goodfellas, or is that bopping period soundtrack
too intoxicating for us to notice?
Note, however, that of all the issues that Scorsese tries to cram into his on-screen depictions of
masculine viciousness, notions of violence as a product of carefully explored mental disturbance
don't register as strongly. His films are not anti-psychological, and one can certainly read many of
Scorsese's protagonists as victims of psychic traumas. And yet we aren't asked to put Travis Bickle,
Henry Hill, or other of his (anti)heroes on the analyst's couch. (This might be why The Aviator's
mommy-scrubbed-me-rather-than-loved-me opening flashback feels so clunky.) We view them
more as products of their environment, shaped—and often warped—by cultural expectations whose
roots lie beyond their understanding. This contributes to that Scorsese distance: the emotional and
intellectual space between us and the character that allows us to plug into their experience while
always remaining a bit outside of it, all the better to question their destructive acts. We know them
and yet we don't, as perhaps too clear an understanding of their inner workings might upset the
delicate balance of empathy and objectivity that allows Scorsese to keep his various thematic plates
spinning in the air.
http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/print.php?rid=5140 Page 1 of 4
2. Slant Magazine | Film | Raging Bull 4/9/12 12:32 PM
For all these reasons, Scorsese might never again find a subject as ideal as Jake LaMotta, the Bronx-
based boxer whose public bouts and private demons Raging Bull chronicles with such bruising
acuity. Internalizing the aggressive machismo of his surroundings but lacking the awareness to
control it, LaMotta is all brute physical action, throwing hard punches and harder stares at a world
made up of objects to be possessed and obstacles to be pummeled. He can be observed,
contemplated, judged, but never really understood. When we first meet him, Jake (Robert De Niro)
has long given up his lifelong battle with the bulge. His ballooned body stuffed into a suit, he puffs
on a cigar as he recites a rhythmic little poem about his past life as a prizefighter. "That's
entertainment!" Jake says at the end of his piece, repeating the phrase in a lower, perhaps more
contemplative tone as Scorsese cuts from a close-up of his bloated face circa 1964 to a matching
shot of him in 1941, leaner and about to be decked by opponent Sugar Ray Robinson in the boxing
ring. Such a structure would seem to indicate a certain ruminative quality to Raging Bull, as the
LaMotta of later years recalls the path that ended with him fat, alone, and working as a floundering
nightclub performer. One of the triumphs of both Scorsese's direction and Paul Schrader and
Mardik Martin's screenplay comes from how fascinating Jake remains despite him gleaning little to
no awareness regarding his inner rage and crippling sense of sexual insecurity. So many biopics
insist on squeezing their real-life subjects through the pop-psychology strainer and catching
whatever meager insights dribble out: canned recapitulations of damaged childhoods, meteoric
rises, and substance-addled downfalls that reveal more about the schematics of contemporary
screenwriting than truths about the individuals at hand. The extent to which Raging Bull sidesteps
such reductionism is remarkable.
The film takes us through the highlight reel of LaMotta's life from the early 1940s through the mid
1960s—with those formative early years conspicuously left out. Jake rises in the middleweight
boxing ranks along with brother and manager Joey (Joe Pesci). He comes achingly close to the title
but agrees to throw the match at the last minute, before finally getting the champion's belt in 1949.
Along the way, he ditches his first wife in favor of Vickie (Cathy Moriarty), a blond beauty from the
neighborhood that Jake meets at the local pool.
Without losing sight of LaMotta's career arc, however, Scorsese narrows in on those themes that
make Jake's story very much of a piece with the rest of his oeuvre. Jake's possessiveness of Cathy
soon morphs into full-blown sexual paranoia. He tracks Cathy's whereabouts and becomes
convinced that she's sleeping with local mafioso Salvy Batts (Frank Vincent) and members of his
crew. This obsession grows out of a more generalized sense of isolationist machismo, revealed
through DP Michael Chapman's alternately seductive and unforgiving black-and-white
cinematography, Thelma Schoonmaker's stunning POV editing, and the masterfully manipulated
soundscape of bustling Bronx streets and swanky Manhattan nightclubs.
Life becomes funneled through Jake's suspicious mentality, the rest of the world blearily fading into
http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/print.php?rid=5140 Page 2 of 4
3. Slant Magazine | Film | Raging Bull 4/9/12 12:32 PM
the background as innocent pecks on the cheek or clasped hands become infused with ill-defined
portent. That we don't comprehend the thought process behind these vivid distrustful glances only
heightens our ambivalence toward Jake and underlines his own animalistic territorialism. Is it any
wonder that a director known for his expressive use of voiceover chose to keep Jake's inner
monologue silent, with only the sounds of roaring lions and disembodied screeches connected to his
subjective state? This push-pull effect gives Jake's increasingly aggressive efforts to control Vickie a
predictability that's both sickening and queasily fascinating.
The film paints a claustrophobic portrait of violent compulsion, with scenes of domestic abuse
made all the more clammy by a static, unblinking camera. Yet beatings are not confined to the
home. Any situation is primed to explode in the Bronx of Raging Bull, a point driven home when
LaMotta's first losing bout with Sugar Ray Robinson quickly ignites into a stadium-sized
altercation. Men throw one another into and out of the boxing ring while a female spectator gets
trampled by the enraged mob—a pitiless microcosm of most women's fate in Raging Bull's world of
hard line masculinity.
Yet if violence is endemic, it's also not without its thrills and even beauty. I'll never forget the shot
of a single wooden folding chair, captured at a low angle as it's hoisted over the crowd and hangs
momentarily in the air before crashing down into the stewing masses. And of course there are the
boxing sequences themselves, among the most dissected scenes in contemporary cinematic history.
Watching them again, their flexibility of tone and technique struck me most. One mostly
remembers the bloody climaxes of these bouts, with noses breaking and blood spurting in hypnotic
slow motion. But the sheer variety of moods and images proves most impressive, with jagged cuts of
flashbulbs and beaten flesh intermixing with lyrical track-ins to Jake as he stews in his corner or
stalks around his opponent. This makes sense, given that LaMotta uses the boxing ring not just as
an arena for sport, but an ever-shifting psychic space in and of itself: a battleground to defend his
wounded ego; a showcase to intimidate and silence his family; and, in his final match with Sugar
Ray Robinson, a personal Calvary on which this Catholic sinner transforms physical pummeling
into spiritual ablution.
That LaMotta, consciously or otherwise, worked out these inner demons on a public stage made
him not just a product of his brutal surroundings, but a performer. His natural aggression found its
consummation in the ring, and he attempted to transfer that antagonism to a second-act career as a
comedian and nightclub emcee once his boxing career floundered and he moved his family to
Florida. Watching him stumble through canned jokes and strike back at drunken hecklers proves,
in its own way, as uncomfortable as his boxing bouts. De Niro's performance remains a
monumental feat, and you notice it most in these later scenes—not just the much-discussed weight
gain, but the unblinking portrayal of an innately physical man slowly becoming trapped by his
once-lithe body. The heaviness becomes at once a bodily reality and a metaphoric accretion of
http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/print.php?rid=5140 Page 3 of 4
4. Slant Magazine | Film | Raging Bull 4/9/12 12:32 PM
wrongdoings. De Niro doesn't play LaMotta with any actorly distance, embracing Jake's essence as
primal instinct rather than psychological portraiture. And yet he knows just when to crack open
LaMotta a bit and offer a tragic flash of self-awareness. Jake brings Vickie back to his apartment
early in the film, giving her a little tour and informing her that he bought the place from his father.
Vickie asks if he got the money from fighting. "Yeah," Jake says, looking away for a moment before
adding with a quiet laugh, "what else?"
DIRECTOR(S):Martin Scorsese SCREENPLAY: Paul Schrader and Mardik Martin; based on the book by Jake
LaMotta with Joseph Carter, Peter Savage CAST: Robert De Niro, Cathy Moriarty, Joe Pesci, Frank Vincent,
Nicholas Colasanto, Theresa Saldana, Mario Gallo DISTRIBUTOR: MGM RUNTIME: 129 RATING: R YEAR:
1980
http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/print.php?rid=5140 Page 4 of 4