SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Second Experimental Results:
Tape Vs. No Tape Covering the
Bowl & Balloon
Mckenzie Patrick
Photo Comparison
Data Table
Boat With Or Without Mass of Mass the Boat Held (g)
Tape Surrounding Bowl & Balloon the Boat (g) Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Trial 5 Trial 6 Trial 7 Trial 8 Trial 9 Trial 10 Average
With 34.9 12.5 12.5 10 10 15 17.5 15 20 17.5 12.5 14.25
Without 32.7 12.5 7.5 5 5 2.5 5 5 2.5 5 5 5.5
What Was Learned
I learned that removing the tape surrounding
the bowl was worse than the prototype.
The one without held an average of only
5.5 grams and the one with held an
average of 14.25 grams. This is probably
because the tape holds the aluminum foil
to the bowl. Without the tape, the water is
able to seep in between the bowl and the
aluminum foil.

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

CAD CAMM Project
CAD CAMM ProjectCAD CAMM Project
CAD CAMM ProjectDanielM31
 
Second experimental results
Second experimental resultsSecond experimental results
Second experimental resultsmckenziepatrick
 
Serce Kościoła1
Serce Kościoła1Serce Kościoła1
Serce Kościoła1klara78
 
Domestic future-proof radio
Domestic future-proof radioDomestic future-proof radio
Domestic future-proof radioDanielM31
 
Research presentation
Research presentationResearch presentation
Research presentationDanielM31
 
Individual presentation
Individual presentationIndividual presentation
Individual presentationDanielM31
 

Viewers also liked (11)

Prototype information
Prototype informationPrototype information
Prototype information
 
CAD CAMM Project
CAD CAMM ProjectCAD CAMM Project
CAD CAMM Project
 
Second experimental results
Second experimental resultsSecond experimental results
Second experimental results
 
Reflection questions
Reflection questionsReflection questions
Reflection questions
 
Serce Kościoła1
Serce Kościoła1Serce Kościoła1
Serce Kościoła1
 
Domestic future-proof radio
Domestic future-proof radioDomestic future-proof radio
Domestic future-proof radio
 
Research presentation
Research presentationResearch presentation
Research presentation
 
Historia de la computadora
Historia de la computadoraHistoria de la computadora
Historia de la computadora
 
Prototype information
Prototype informationPrototype information
Prototype information
 
Logs
LogsLogs
Logs
 
Individual presentation
Individual presentationIndividual presentation
Individual presentation
 

Second experimental results

  • 1. Second Experimental Results: Tape Vs. No Tape Covering the Bowl & Balloon Mckenzie Patrick
  • 3. Data Table Boat With Or Without Mass of Mass the Boat Held (g) Tape Surrounding Bowl & Balloon the Boat (g) Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Trial 5 Trial 6 Trial 7 Trial 8 Trial 9 Trial 10 Average With 34.9 12.5 12.5 10 10 15 17.5 15 20 17.5 12.5 14.25 Without 32.7 12.5 7.5 5 5 2.5 5 5 2.5 5 5 5.5
  • 4. What Was Learned I learned that removing the tape surrounding the bowl was worse than the prototype. The one without held an average of only 5.5 grams and the one with held an average of 14.25 grams. This is probably because the tape holds the aluminum foil to the bowl. Without the tape, the water is able to seep in between the bowl and the aluminum foil.