The Rise of Samsung
Electronics
Case study

Sjoerd van Eerdenburg
Evgenii Gvozdev
Roelof van Laar
Content
Company profile
SWOT analysis
Market analysis
Porters five forces analysis
Strategy recommendations
Samsung company profile
South Korean company, founded in 1938
Largest chaebol
Total revenue € 185.1 bn (2012)
Samsung Electronics largest SBU, revenu € 140.5 bn
(2012)
CEO is Dr. Oh-Hyun Kwon
72 Countries
206,000 employees
Samsung smart phones
First SE mobile phone in 1988
Apple introduces smartphone in 2007
SE smartphones unsuccesful at first
3.7% market share at the end of 2009
Google Android launched in 2010
Samsung Galaxy S in June 2010
Market leader in 2012, with 215 m units
SWOT
analysis
Strengths

Weaknesses

Strong brand value

Own OS and software
are unpopular

Diversified product
line

Product
cannibalization

Innovation and design

Main competitors are
largest customers

High market share

Patent infringement
Opportunities

Threats

Growing Indian market

Low cost Chinese
products

Strong partnerships that
can be enhanched

Rapid technological
change

Increasing demand for SE
quality application
processors

Price wars

Unrelated profile
diversification

Advertising revenue
goes to/through Google
Market analysis
Key Issues:
Samsung performs as flanker, not as leader
Looses market share in emerging
smartphone markets to cheaper
brands (China -6% 2011-2012)

Needs to develop further
software of its own, vulnerable
to Google’s power
Market Overview
Porters five forces analysis
Threat of new entrants

Competitive rivalry

High, mainy Chinese competitors

High, fierce competion with Apple, Sony, SK Hynix, etc.

Threat of substitutes
High, many similar products on the market

Customer power
High, low threshold for switching

Supplier power
Low, Samsung market leader

Complementors (sixth
force)
Open Handset Alliance (OHA): Android OS
Apple, market creator, large customer
Strategy recommendations
Samsung must position itself
as market leader and
resume its current strategy
concerning product
innovation and market
divided segments in Western
Market (including their
power in the supply of
smartphone components
and marketing to revenue
ratio), because
Samsung must research and develop its own software platform, because
Samsung must attack and enter the growing segment of cheaper smartphones and
especially conquer China and be heavily invested in India (long term growth),
because both countries will enlarge the smartphone market as a whole and have the
need for a cheaper smartphone
Sources
Case study: The Rise of Samsung Electronics
Samsung Electronics annual report 2012
http://www.samsung.com/us/aboutsamsung/investor_relations/financial_information/downloads/2013/SECAR2012_Eng_Fin
al.pdf

Hong, Y. S. (2012). Modes of Combinative Innovation: Case of
Samsung
Electronics. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy,
1, 219-239.
Hsin, C. (2010). The Innovation Strategy of Core Competence and
Enterprise
Growth–The Case Study of Samsung.
Vergara, R. (2012). Samsung Electronics and Apple, Inc.: A Study
in Contrast
in Vertical Integration in the 21 st
Century.
American International
Journal of Contemporary

Samsung Electronics Strategy & Business Model

  • 1.
    The Rise ofSamsung Electronics Case study Sjoerd van Eerdenburg Evgenii Gvozdev Roelof van Laar
  • 2.
    Content Company profile SWOT analysis Marketanalysis Porters five forces analysis Strategy recommendations
  • 3.
    Samsung company profile SouthKorean company, founded in 1938 Largest chaebol Total revenue € 185.1 bn (2012) Samsung Electronics largest SBU, revenu € 140.5 bn (2012) CEO is Dr. Oh-Hyun Kwon 72 Countries 206,000 employees
  • 4.
    Samsung smart phones FirstSE mobile phone in 1988 Apple introduces smartphone in 2007 SE smartphones unsuccesful at first 3.7% market share at the end of 2009 Google Android launched in 2010 Samsung Galaxy S in June 2010 Market leader in 2012, with 215 m units
  • 5.
    SWOT analysis Strengths Weaknesses Strong brand value OwnOS and software are unpopular Diversified product line Product cannibalization Innovation and design Main competitors are largest customers High market share Patent infringement
  • 6.
    Opportunities Threats Growing Indian market Lowcost Chinese products Strong partnerships that can be enhanched Rapid technological change Increasing demand for SE quality application processors Price wars Unrelated profile diversification Advertising revenue goes to/through Google
  • 7.
    Market analysis Key Issues: Samsungperforms as flanker, not as leader Looses market share in emerging smartphone markets to cheaper brands (China -6% 2011-2012) Needs to develop further software of its own, vulnerable to Google’s power
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Porters five forcesanalysis Threat of new entrants Competitive rivalry High, mainy Chinese competitors High, fierce competion with Apple, Sony, SK Hynix, etc. Threat of substitutes High, many similar products on the market Customer power High, low threshold for switching Supplier power Low, Samsung market leader Complementors (sixth force) Open Handset Alliance (OHA): Android OS Apple, market creator, large customer
  • 10.
    Strategy recommendations Samsung mustposition itself as market leader and resume its current strategy concerning product innovation and market divided segments in Western Market (including their power in the supply of smartphone components and marketing to revenue ratio), because
  • 11.
    Samsung must researchand develop its own software platform, because
  • 12.
    Samsung must attackand enter the growing segment of cheaper smartphones and especially conquer China and be heavily invested in India (long term growth), because both countries will enlarge the smartphone market as a whole and have the need for a cheaper smartphone
  • 13.
    Sources Case study: TheRise of Samsung Electronics Samsung Electronics annual report 2012 http://www.samsung.com/us/aboutsamsung/investor_relations/financial_information/downloads/2013/SECAR2012_Eng_Fin al.pdf Hong, Y. S. (2012). Modes of Combinative Innovation: Case of Samsung Electronics. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 1, 219-239. Hsin, C. (2010). The Innovation Strategy of Core Competence and Enterprise Growth–The Case Study of Samsung. Vergara, R. (2012). Samsung Electronics and Apple, Inc.: A Study in Contrast in Vertical Integration in the 21 st Century. American International Journal of Contemporary