This document discusses Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity and how it differs from Isaac Newton's theory of universal gravitation. It provides explanations of key concepts in both theories, such as how general relativity describes gravity as a distortion of spacetime geometry rather than a force. It also outlines some predictions of general relativity that have been confirmed experimentally, like gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation. However, it argues that Einstein's theory lacks fundamental origins and ignores basic scientific principles, making it an irrational theory despite its acceptance.

1. Relatividad.
Relativität, Relativita, Relativité, σχετικότητα, Relativity, Relatività,
Относительность, Pелативитет, Relativitet, Relativitetsteorien.
Relatività, Względność, Relativitate, відносність, Relativnost.
Относительность, относительность,
Относительность относительность, относительность
Относительность
Относительность относительность
Relatividad.
Relatividad, Relatividad

2. Relatividad.
Analysis item.
Dr. Albert Einstein, was made famous by the publication of the theory of
relativity, both the general and the particular.
Consider a few things in particular.
Classical Mechanics: Law of Universal Gravitation Newton
Law of universal gravitation.
The effects of gravity are always attractive, and the resultant force is
calculated for the center of gravity of both objects (in the case of Earth
gravity center is the center of mass, as in most of the bodies celestial
characteristics).
Gravity has infinite range performance, but the force is greater if the
objects are close, and while away the force will lose strength. The Law of
Universal Gravitation Newton states that the force exerted by a point
particle with mass over another mass is directly proportional to the product
of the masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance
between them:
where is the unit vector directed from particle 1 to 2, that is, in the direction
of the vector, and is the universal gravitational constant, its value being
approximately 6.674 × 10-11 N • m2/kg2.
For example, using the law of universal gravitation, we can calculate the
force of attraction between Earth and a body of 50 kg. The mass of Earth is
5.974 × 1024 kg and the distance between the center of gravity of the Earth
(center of the earth) and the center of gravity is 6378.14 km (equal to
6,378,140 m, and assuming that the body is on the line of Ecuador). Then,
the force is:
The force that attracts the earth and the body of 50 kg is 490.062 N
[Newtons, International System of Units], representing 50 kgf [kg / force,
technical system], as expected, so we simply the body weighs 50 kg.
Within this empirical law, we have these important conclusions:

3. • Gravitational forces are always attractive. The fact that the planets
describe a closed orbit around the Sun indicate this fact. An attractive
force open orbits may also occur but a repulsive force can never produce
closed orbits.
• They have infinite range. Two bodies, however far they may be,
experience this force.
• The force associated with the gravitational interaction is central.
Despite the centuries, today still used daily this law in the field of body
motion even at the scale of the solar system, although theoretically be
outdated.
Einstein's Theory of General Relativity makes a different analysis of the
gravitational interaction. According to this theory, gravity can be
understood as a geometric effect of matter on space / time when a certain
amount of matter occupies a region of space-time causes it to deform.
Seen this way, the gravitational force is no longer a "mysterious force that
attracts" but the effect of the warping of space-time, non-Euclidean
geometry - the movement of bodies. According to this theory, since all
objects move in space-time, to deform it, the path of those will be diverted
to producing its acceleration is what we call gravity.
Relativistic Mechanics: Theory of General Relativity
Main articles: General Relativity and Approximation for weak gravitational
fields
Schematic representation of the two-dimensional space-time deformation
in the Earth's environment.
Albert Einstein revised Newton's theory in his theory of general relativity,
describing the gravitational interaction as a distortion of the geometry of
space / time as a result of the mass of bodies, space and time assume a
proactive role.
According to Einstein, there is no gravitational pull, the force is an illusion,
an effect of the geometry. Thus the Earth warps space-time around us, so
that space itself pushes us towards the ground. An ant, walking on a
crumpled paper, you have the feeling that there are mysterious forces that
push in different directions, but all there are folds in the paper, its
geometría.1
The geometric distortion is characterized by satisfying the metric tensor

4. field equations Einstein. The "gravity" Newtonian is only an effect
associated with the fact that an observer at rest with respect to the source
of the field is an inertial observer and therefore to try to apply the
relativistic equivalent of Newton's laws fictitious forces measured given by
the Christoffel symbols of the metric of spacetime.
In the presence of a spherical mass, space-time is not flat but curved, and
the metric tensor g used to calculate the distances is given in usual
coordinates, called Schwarzschild metric:
where G is the universal gravitational constant, M is the mass of the star,
and c is the speed of light. The equation of the geodesic equation will
trajectories in curved spacetime. If we consider a particle at rest relative to
the gravitational mass that creates the field, it has to follow a path given by
the equations:
The first of these equations gives the change of the radial coordinate, and
the second gives the time dilation inertial relative to an observer located at
a great distance from earth which creates the field. If these equations are
particularized for the initial instant in which the particle is at rest and
begins to move from the initial position is reached the force apparent that
an observer standing still would measure is given by:
This expression coincides with the expression of the Newtonian theory if
one considers that gravitational time dilation to an observer in a
gravitational field and at rest with respect to the source of the field is given
by:
Gravitational wave.
In addition, general relativity predicts gravitational wave propagation.
These waves could only be measurable if violent astrophysical phenomena
arise as the collision of two massive stars or remnants of the Big Bang.
These waves have been detected indirectly in the variation of the rotation
period of double pulsars. Furthermore, the current quantum theories point
to a "unit of measure of gravity", the graviton. As particle that causes this
"force", ie as particle associated to the gravitational field.

5. With the help of this new theory, we can observe and study a new series of
unexplained events before or not observed:
• Deviation gravitational redshift of light in the presence of intense gravity
fields: the frequency of the light decreases as it passes through a region of
high gravity. Confirmed by the experiment of Pound and Rebka (1959).
• Gravitational time dilation: clocks located in high gravity conditions keep
time more slowly than clocks located in a weightless environment.
Demonstrated experimentally with atomic clocks located on the Earth's
surface and the clocks in orbit of Global Positioning System, GPS for its
acronym in English). Also, although it is very small time intervals, different
tests with planetary probes have values very close to those predicted by
general relativity.
• Effect Shapiro (gravitational dilation lags): different signals through a
strong gravitational field need more time to do it.
• orbital decay due to the emission of gravitational radiation. Observed in
binary pulsars.
• Procession geodesic: due to the curvature of space-time, the orientation
of a gyroscope in rotation will change over time. This is being tested by the
satellite Gravity Probe B.
In general we can say is that the difference between Newton and Einstein,
is that the force of gravity, Newton due to the mass of matter, this attracts
to itself, and that of Einstein is an entirely different matter, and it is pushing
spacetime therefore not matter that we are attracting, what unites us is the
mass space, as this is pushing us toward the mass.
Experiments have been done about it, but it should be noted how curious
they are all trying to prove that Einstein's theory is true, it indicates the
degree of interest by scientists, which with all partiality, and infatuation by
physicists Einstein's theory, always assume and conclude that this is right.
In practical can do some testing, and is also physically observable who is
right.
Here are some arguments, analysis.
Begin by Einstein's idea of joining two things, 1. - Space, 2. - Time.
Interesting this is really interesting, in physics, the more absurd the idea,
but acceptance has, consider separately these two things, 1. Space, we can
say the space, the space consists of nothing, since space without matter is

6. nothing is the empty sky, 2. Eventually, we can say that this can not exist,
since the time is a consequence of the matter and the transformation of
this movement and therefore the time is later than the appearance of the
material, irrespective of the form say how the matter appeared, here are
two general positions assumed by physicists or people in general, which
converge in a single, yet they look like two completely different opinions,
the logical conclusion is that there is widespread and an origin, a
beginning , a unique, some would say that was the Big Bang, or many
others will say, in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth,
therefore, we start from the point in space, devoid of matter, is empty, and
is nothing, and therefore, there is no time, can not be observed, can not be
measured, which leads to Einstein's theory, lacks basic fundamentals of
origin, and that is an unacceptable irrationally theory, but with the theory of
relativity did not accept failure, nor use logic and basic principles of
established science, omitted the first part of a theory, the preemption, or
we can say the preface, the very foundations of science were omitted and
raped, Einstein left already established, bypassing the rational basis of his
idea turned into theory, Einstein broke in very convenient way for your idea
or theory, from the point of a universe with matter and therefore eventually
break the key, that is the explanation that was for him, space, and therefore
the time gave no light or evidence that space-time is, with this the sack
nothing something new, I physically and scientifically unexplainable, he
invented the concept of space and time, is something, an independent,
united, space and time are one thing, is a kind of new creation, and this
tool jump all the basic principles of intelligence and human understanding,
and the concept of this new entity called time and space, design
fundamentals to try to explain what was inexplicable to him, and he did
something really to explain natural or scientific explanation needed, he did
only to explain their arguments very personal assumptions, and very
personal way of seeing the universe, something even more interesting is
that this entity or concept, theory or idea, relate it deftly with physical
effects, in this concept of time and space, in the presence of matter, time
and space is curved, it gives a rational explanation for astronomical
movement, and according to this principle, the light in the universe
traveled by the curvature, and gravity is no longer an attractive force of
matter, mass, space is pushing.
Consider, we saw what is space, space is the place where the matter, which

7. the constitution is nothing, so we can see at present seems to be infinite,
this according to our observations, to the limit of the sky in space can not
exist without matter time as this as we saw, is after the appearance of
matter, and this is not an entity, time is change and transformation of
matter in a path, which should not only be present, must be systematically
changes, these two things are not physical entities own, nor are joined, are
like a blank sheet of paper on which is written anything, in any direction, so
So these two things are not united and do not contain physical, or tangible
or observable, therefore Einstein space can not exert pressure on anything,
and the time of Einstein can not measure anything, or can be relative, the
space and time have no personality, are the open space where we will put
the matter, and this being real, physical existence can be proven, we can
say of the matter, which interacts on itself, is real and verifiable existence,
observable changes and transformations in this accommodation, we call
space, matter is the creator of time, as a space without matter, does not
contain the time, this is a logical and scientifically verifiable, as intelligent
beings, we can conclude these theoretical claims, and without a doubt, that
the result suggested by Einstein spacetime is totally illusory, unreal,
physically nonexistent and therefore scientifically improbable, unreal time
this space, you can not interact with matter, and much less with the
cosmos, this space-time, existed only in the mind of its creator, and is
living the fantasy of fanatical followers of this theory, which at all costs
want to show that what is false fictitious, and irrational, may be real.
Continue with the analysis of the theory of relativity.
Suppose formulated by this theory is true, if this were true, our universe
would be totally different, and not only physically different, it would be
totally different, as observably what should happen next. During the night
to observe a planet in our solar system, and this in its path when passing
stellar stars, would be observable, that the light of these, would circle the
planet, for example, suppose that is Jupiter, seeing Jupiter , passing in
front of a star, would be observable, that the star would be on both sides of
the planet, since light is circling, its circumference, and therefore would
have a visual effect similar to having a double vision problem, but Jupiter
with one in the center of the star, another consequence of this curvature,
the planets would receive less sunlight, since such curvature would
prevent the rectilinear path of the light, thus preventing interaction between
the light and the planets.

8. If this is true, which is not of course to explain the entry of light to our
planet earth, we have to make a new theory, which we can call, explaining
the escape of light spatial curvature, and postulate a rational equation of
this effect, which I think is easier, discard this theory, to formulate a
rational explanation for the curvature of space not all light directs its
cause.
If true, the universe would be lit at night by countless stars, formless as
having stars behind the stars would have an effect of light propagating in
our observation, creating a multiplication of the light of the stars deep in
the sky, so we would have a night with effects similar but smaller in scale
to what happens in the day.
As for the pull of gravity, we would have a bigger problem to explain, since
the attraction distance between planets and what is around you, it will be
impossible to understand.
Absolute proof, no doubt of the falsity of this theory, is what happens to
the Earth's oceans in the presence of our satellite the moon, as these in the
presence of her deformed, this deformation creating product attraction of
the mass, which is absolutely proven that Newtonian mechanics is
absolutely true, because of the depth of the Earth's oceans there is no
spatial fold thrust, our oceans in the direction of our satellite the moon,
with this simple observation can be proved without a doubt that the theory
of relativity is quite improbable, and certainly false.
As for the tests conducted that support in a way that the theory is true, I
note the following.
Pound and Rebka Experiment (1959).
All it proves is that the gravitational effect on light as the mass and become
the attraction towards red.
Experiment of atomic clocks.
Gravitational time dilation: clocks located in high gravity conditions keep
time more slowly than clocks located in a weightless environment.
This only demonstrates is that when two tests are different, different
results will be obtained.
• Effect Shapiro (gravitational dilation lags): different signals through a
strong gravitational field need more time to do it.
• This effect is also strong evidence that Newton's mechanics, is absolutely
right.
•

9. • Procession geodesic: due to the curvature of space-time, the orientation
of a gyroscope in rotation will change over time. This is being tested by the
satellite Gravity Probe B.
• In this test I can say with certainty that the gyroscope will never change
their orientation, and if this happens to be a fan of this theory physically
handle the gyroscope making it change direction, to extol the theory of
relativity.
Of the relativity of time and know my position, and we all know that is the
time where you can not travel or pointing toward the future, and we would
not find the subject in another location, in the same way trying to go into
the past find that attempts to place the matter would not be in the same
position, for its systematic changes which are irreversible.
In conclusion we must say, that because these theories irrational, fictitious,
physicists are increasingly far from finding irrefutable truths, confusion
and chaos reign in education, the growing science fiction, is generating
results in the are now evident.
Devices of time and space.
This kind of power generating devices are now available, many
stakeholders are testing how to build them, primarily in Russia and
Germany, very soon, nothing will stop there as radical changes to the
teaching of physics in regards .
If you want information on how to build one, I can only give you the
information request it, you can find lots of information on how to reach me,
I am pleased to give it, contact me on the web at the addresses can be
located.
Arturo Raul Cortes.