Ayat menjelaskan bahwa minuman keras dan judi memiliki dosa besar meskipun ada manfaat, tapi dosanya lebih besar. Ketika ditanya soal pengeluaran, harus lebih dari kebutuhan. Ayat ini diajarkan agar manusia berfikir dan memilih yang terbaik.
The Sessions Court found both defendants equally liable for the deaths and injuries caused by a fire at a hostel for school children. The High Court overturned this on appeal, finding that the second defendant (the local authority that owned the building) owed no duty of care as a matter of law, either as a landlord or in its capacity as a local authority. It held that under the applicable common law as of 1956, a landlord is not liable for dangers existing on leased premises. The plaintiffs now appeal to the Federal Court seeking to reinstate the Sessions Court's finding of liability against both defendants.
Este documento não continha nenhum conteúdo para resumir, já que consistia apenas em símbolos como traços e quebras de linha. Um resumo precisa incluir as informações essenciais do documento, mas nenhuma informação foi fornecida neste caso.
This document contains a summary of Quranic verses and hadiths related to Islamic law. It lists the group members of A H M A D I B R A H I M K U L L I Y Y A H O F L A W, including WAN NURHIDAYAH IZNI BT WAN IBRAHIM, WAN NURHAZWANI BT WAN ISMAIL, SITI ATIKAH BT MOHD ZULKIFLI, and AINA SYAFIQAH BT RAZALI. It includes two Quranic verses from Surah Al-A'raf that discuss proper attire and conduct during prayer and around the Kaaba, as well as
This document provides a summary of Quranic ayah and hadith related to laws. It was presented by Ustaz Asmadi to a group consisting of Aishah Zulkifli, Fatimah Az-Zahra, Fawdatuzzihan Suandi, and Izrynda Izman. The document outlines several Quranic verses and sayings of Muhammad that are related to legal and lawful matters in Islam.
The document summarizes the key findings and lessons from a court case regarding the 1993 collapse of Block 1 of Highland Towers apartments in Malaysia.
The High Court found the developer, architect, engineer, and local authority partly liable for negligence related to inadequate drainage and slope stability. It ruled that the architect and engineer owed a duty of care to properly design and oversee drainage, retaining walls, and ensure slope stability. Both were found to have breached their duties, though the engineer was also at fault for falsely claiming drainage works were completed. The document examines the roles and legal responsibilities of various professionals to draw lessons on safely developing hilly sites.
The document discusses the establishment of the Court for Children in Malaysia to protect the welfare of children. Key points include:
- The Court for Children was established to replace the Juvenile Court and ensure protection and assistance for all children without discrimination.
- A child is defined as someone under 18, or under 10 for criminal proceedings.
- The Court for Children aims to protect child offenders through restrictions on who can be present in hearings and media reporting of cases.
- Sentencing options for the Court for Children focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment, and children cannot be sentenced to death or imprisoned with adults.
The Sessions Court found both defendants equally liable for the deaths and injuries caused by a fire at a hostel for school children. The High Court overturned this on appeal, finding that the second defendant (the local authority that owned the building) owed no duty of care as a matter of law, either as a landlord or in its capacity as a local authority. It held that under the applicable common law as of 1956, a landlord is not liable for dangers existing on leased premises. The plaintiffs now appeal to the Federal Court seeking to reinstate the Sessions Court's finding of liability against both defendants.
Este documento não continha nenhum conteúdo para resumir, já que consistia apenas em símbolos como traços e quebras de linha. Um resumo precisa incluir as informações essenciais do documento, mas nenhuma informação foi fornecida neste caso.
This document contains a summary of Quranic verses and hadiths related to Islamic law. It lists the group members of A H M A D I B R A H I M K U L L I Y Y A H O F L A W, including WAN NURHIDAYAH IZNI BT WAN IBRAHIM, WAN NURHAZWANI BT WAN ISMAIL, SITI ATIKAH BT MOHD ZULKIFLI, and AINA SYAFIQAH BT RAZALI. It includes two Quranic verses from Surah Al-A'raf that discuss proper attire and conduct during prayer and around the Kaaba, as well as
This document provides a summary of Quranic ayah and hadith related to laws. It was presented by Ustaz Asmadi to a group consisting of Aishah Zulkifli, Fatimah Az-Zahra, Fawdatuzzihan Suandi, and Izrynda Izman. The document outlines several Quranic verses and sayings of Muhammad that are related to legal and lawful matters in Islam.
The document summarizes the key findings and lessons from a court case regarding the 1993 collapse of Block 1 of Highland Towers apartments in Malaysia.
The High Court found the developer, architect, engineer, and local authority partly liable for negligence related to inadequate drainage and slope stability. It ruled that the architect and engineer owed a duty of care to properly design and oversee drainage, retaining walls, and ensure slope stability. Both were found to have breached their duties, though the engineer was also at fault for falsely claiming drainage works were completed. The document examines the roles and legal responsibilities of various professionals to draw lessons on safely developing hilly sites.
The document discusses the establishment of the Court for Children in Malaysia to protect the welfare of children. Key points include:
- The Court for Children was established to replace the Juvenile Court and ensure protection and assistance for all children without discrimination.
- A child is defined as someone under 18, or under 10 for criminal proceedings.
- The Court for Children aims to protect child offenders through restrictions on who can be present in hearings and media reporting of cases.
- Sentencing options for the Court for Children focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment, and children cannot be sentenced to death or imprisoned with adults.
Eddie Mabo was a Murray Islander who took his land rights case to the Australian High Court in 1982, arguing that Indigenous people had owned their lands for thousands of years. In 1993, the High Court overturned the doctrine of terra nullius and recognized native title. This recognized that Aboriginal people held rights and interests to their traditional lands prior to European settlement, even if the government had not formally recognized this. The 1996 Wik decision further established that native title could coexist with pastoral leases, allowing Indigenous groups to negotiate land usage with commercial interests like mining and pastoral companies.
The document discusses the Australian legal system, including the main sources of law and the role of courts. It focuses on case law (common law) and how precedent is developed through judicial decisions. A key case discussed is Donoghue v Stevenson, which established the neighbour principle of duty of care in tort law. The summary establishes that case law is developed through judicial precedent where higher courts can overrule and distinguish previous decisions of lower courts to develop legal principles over time.
This document discusses the course "Quranic Ayat and Hadith in Law I" with the course code SHA 1550A. The course aims to examine the role of Quranic verses and prophetic traditions in shaping Islamic legal theory and rulings. It will cover foundational topics including sources of Islamic law, principles of jurisprudence, and the role of reasoning in deriving rulings.
Surat Al-Baqarah ayat 172-173 mengajak umat Islam untuk hanya memakan makanan yang halal yang telah diberikan Allah dan bersyukur kepada-Nya. Allah hanya mengharamkan memakan bangkai, darah, dan daging binatang yang disembelih selain atas nama Allah. Jika seseorang memakan makanan haram karena terpaksa, maka tidak akan berdosa asalkan tidak melampaui batas.
This document discusses and analyzes the legal defense of necessity in response to the quote "Necessity is never a defence to murder." It summarizes the leading case of Dudley and Stephens (1884) where necessity was not accepted as a defense for murder. It argues that the word "never" is too absolute given that future circumstances may warrant allowing necessity as a defense. It provides a hypothetical example where necessity would be a valid defense to save many lives at the cost of one. The document concludes that judges should consider necessity defenses on a case-by-case basis rather than having an absolute rule.
The document discusses insanity as a defense in criminal law. It provides definitions and explanations of insanity from legal and medical perspectives. The key points are:
1) Insanity in criminal law refers to a mental disorder that impairs reasoning such that the person did not understand the nature of their act or that it was wrong. Medically, insanity refers more broadly to any mental abnormality.
2) English law on insanity is based on the M'Naghten Rules, which provide a cognitive test focusing on whether the person knew the nature and quality of their act and that it was wrong.
3) To claim the insanity defense, the law requires proof of a disease of the
Eddie Mabo was a Murray Islander who took his land rights case to the Australian High Court in 1982, arguing that Indigenous people had owned their lands for thousands of years. In 1993, the High Court overturned the doctrine of terra nullius and recognized native title. This recognized that Aboriginal people held rights and interests to their traditional lands prior to European settlement, even if the government had not formally recognized this. The 1996 Wik decision further established that native title could coexist with pastoral leases, allowing Indigenous groups to negotiate land usage with commercial interests like mining and pastoral companies.
The document discusses the Australian legal system, including the main sources of law and the role of courts. It focuses on case law (common law) and how precedent is developed through judicial decisions. A key case discussed is Donoghue v Stevenson, which established the neighbour principle of duty of care in tort law. The summary establishes that case law is developed through judicial precedent where higher courts can overrule and distinguish previous decisions of lower courts to develop legal principles over time.
This document discusses the course "Quranic Ayat and Hadith in Law I" with the course code SHA 1550A. The course aims to examine the role of Quranic verses and prophetic traditions in shaping Islamic legal theory and rulings. It will cover foundational topics including sources of Islamic law, principles of jurisprudence, and the role of reasoning in deriving rulings.
Surat Al-Baqarah ayat 172-173 mengajak umat Islam untuk hanya memakan makanan yang halal yang telah diberikan Allah dan bersyukur kepada-Nya. Allah hanya mengharamkan memakan bangkai, darah, dan daging binatang yang disembelih selain atas nama Allah. Jika seseorang memakan makanan haram karena terpaksa, maka tidak akan berdosa asalkan tidak melampaui batas.
This document discusses and analyzes the legal defense of necessity in response to the quote "Necessity is never a defence to murder." It summarizes the leading case of Dudley and Stephens (1884) where necessity was not accepted as a defense for murder. It argues that the word "never" is too absolute given that future circumstances may warrant allowing necessity as a defense. It provides a hypothetical example where necessity would be a valid defense to save many lives at the cost of one. The document concludes that judges should consider necessity defenses on a case-by-case basis rather than having an absolute rule.
The document discusses insanity as a defense in criminal law. It provides definitions and explanations of insanity from legal and medical perspectives. The key points are:
1) Insanity in criminal law refers to a mental disorder that impairs reasoning such that the person did not understand the nature of their act or that it was wrong. Medically, insanity refers more broadly to any mental abnormality.
2) English law on insanity is based on the M'Naghten Rules, which provide a cognitive test focusing on whether the person knew the nature and quality of their act and that it was wrong.
3) To claim the insanity defense, the law requires proof of a disease of the
1. Maksudnya: Mereka bertanya kepadamu tentang khamar dan judi. Katakanlah: “Pada keduanya
terdapat dosa yang besar dan beberapa manfaat bagi manusia, tetapi dosa keduanya lebih besar dari
manfaatnya.” Dan mereka bertanya kepadamu apa yang mereka nafkahkan. Katakanlah: ” Yang
lebih dari keperluan.” Demikianlah Allah menerangkan ayat-ayat-Nya kepadamu supaya kamu
berfikir. (surah al-baqarah: 219)
:
-