This document summarizes a court case between Prime Time International Company and the US Department of Agriculture regarding tobacco assessments under the Fair and Equitable Tobacco Reform Act. The USDA assessed Prime Time, a manufacturer of small cigars, quarterly fees based on its market share of the cigar class. Prime Time appealed, arguing that treating all cigars equally failed to account for size differences and that alternative sales data should be used. The court upheld most of the USDA's assessment methodology but found that Prime Time correctly challenged the exclusion of some manufacturers and inclusion of certain expenses.
Marijuana opportunity reinvestment and expungement actikarocampos
This bill seeks to decriminalize and deschedule cannabis at the federal level by removing it from the list of controlled substances. It would require the Attorney General to finalize this removal within 180 days. It would also establish a trust fund from taxes on cannabis products to reinvest in communities impacted by the war on drugs through programs like job training, reentry services, and expungement of criminal records. Additionally, it directs the Bureau of Labor Statistics to collect demographic data on cannabis business owners and employees.
Fr 1987-01-16 1987 resgister 67 type and the prime numbers 1987 which is gaussian prime steven speilebrg heello or shalom is same s priveta dn namaste, but shalom has word om
This brief was submitted by eight states in support of Vermont in defending the constitutionality of Vermont's law requiring the labeling of foods produced with genetic engineering. The brief argues that under Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, laws mandating the disclosure of factual and uncontroversial commercial information are subject to rational basis scrutiny under the First Amendment rather than heightened scrutiny. The brief asserts that Vermont's law requires only the disclosure of an accurate factual statement, that a product was produced through genetic engineering, and does not force speech of a controversial nature, and therefore should be subject to rational basis review under Zauderer.
1372 final order forfeiture $12,000,000_nicodemo scarfomalp2009
This document is a final order of forfeiture from a United States District Court case against Nicodemo Scarfo and others. It details the property to be forfeited by the defendants based on the jury's verdict finding them guilty of RICO conspiracy, securities fraud conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy, wire fraud, and money laundering conspiracy. The order lists various assets to be forfeited, including vehicles, jewelry, bank accounts, stock shares, and $4,327 in cash, as well as a $12 million money judgment representing the proceeds of their criminal activity.
Msnd scallion v. monsanto complaint 18-161Carson Thurman
Marshall W. Scallion and Brooke Scallion, individually and on behalf of Scallion Farms Partnership v. Monsanto Company, BASF Corporation, BASF SE, E.I. dupont Nemours and Company, and Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.; In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, Oxford Division; Cause No.: 3:18-CV-161-MPM-RP
This document provides instructions and information for completing Standard Form 180, Request Pertaining to Military Records. It explains that the form is used to request information from military records and certain identifying information is needed to locate records. It outlines where to mail the form depending on the type of record requested and provides definitions to help complete the form.
The document summarizes that the USDA will publish a final rule adding pork products to the Export Sales Reporting program, which requires weekly reporting of exported grain, oilseed, cotton, beef and cattle hides. It also notes that distillers dried grain will not be included in the reporting at this time, requiring further review. The addition of pork reporting is expected to provide more timely export information but effects remain to be seen. Senators have also proposed legislation requiring USDA to avoid meat inspector furloughs during sequestration budget cuts.
- Three directors are up for election at the annual meeting, including Meredith Brokaw, John Curley, and Samuel Palmisano.
- Peter Clark and Thomas Reynolds will retire from the board at this meeting due to reaching the mandatory retirement age.
- Shareholders will vote on various matters at the annual meeting, including electing directors and auditors, as well as a shareholder proposal. The board recommends voting for directors and auditors and against the shareholder proposal.
Marijuana opportunity reinvestment and expungement actikarocampos
This bill seeks to decriminalize and deschedule cannabis at the federal level by removing it from the list of controlled substances. It would require the Attorney General to finalize this removal within 180 days. It would also establish a trust fund from taxes on cannabis products to reinvest in communities impacted by the war on drugs through programs like job training, reentry services, and expungement of criminal records. Additionally, it directs the Bureau of Labor Statistics to collect demographic data on cannabis business owners and employees.
Fr 1987-01-16 1987 resgister 67 type and the prime numbers 1987 which is gaussian prime steven speilebrg heello or shalom is same s priveta dn namaste, but shalom has word om
This brief was submitted by eight states in support of Vermont in defending the constitutionality of Vermont's law requiring the labeling of foods produced with genetic engineering. The brief argues that under Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, laws mandating the disclosure of factual and uncontroversial commercial information are subject to rational basis scrutiny under the First Amendment rather than heightened scrutiny. The brief asserts that Vermont's law requires only the disclosure of an accurate factual statement, that a product was produced through genetic engineering, and does not force speech of a controversial nature, and therefore should be subject to rational basis review under Zauderer.
1372 final order forfeiture $12,000,000_nicodemo scarfomalp2009
This document is a final order of forfeiture from a United States District Court case against Nicodemo Scarfo and others. It details the property to be forfeited by the defendants based on the jury's verdict finding them guilty of RICO conspiracy, securities fraud conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy, wire fraud, and money laundering conspiracy. The order lists various assets to be forfeited, including vehicles, jewelry, bank accounts, stock shares, and $4,327 in cash, as well as a $12 million money judgment representing the proceeds of their criminal activity.
Msnd scallion v. monsanto complaint 18-161Carson Thurman
Marshall W. Scallion and Brooke Scallion, individually and on behalf of Scallion Farms Partnership v. Monsanto Company, BASF Corporation, BASF SE, E.I. dupont Nemours and Company, and Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.; In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, Oxford Division; Cause No.: 3:18-CV-161-MPM-RP
This document provides instructions and information for completing Standard Form 180, Request Pertaining to Military Records. It explains that the form is used to request information from military records and certain identifying information is needed to locate records. It outlines where to mail the form depending on the type of record requested and provides definitions to help complete the form.
The document summarizes that the USDA will publish a final rule adding pork products to the Export Sales Reporting program, which requires weekly reporting of exported grain, oilseed, cotton, beef and cattle hides. It also notes that distillers dried grain will not be included in the reporting at this time, requiring further review. The addition of pork reporting is expected to provide more timely export information but effects remain to be seen. Senators have also proposed legislation requiring USDA to avoid meat inspector furloughs during sequestration budget cuts.
- Three directors are up for election at the annual meeting, including Meredith Brokaw, John Curley, and Samuel Palmisano.
- Peter Clark and Thomas Reynolds will retire from the board at this meeting due to reaching the mandatory retirement age.
- Shareholders will vote on various matters at the annual meeting, including electing directors and auditors, as well as a shareholder proposal. The board recommends voting for directors and auditors and against the shareholder proposal.
This document is an amicus curiae memorandum submitted in a lawsuit regarding the Honolulu High-Capacity Transit Corridor Project. It argues that the defendants violated Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act in two ways: 1) they failed to fully identify all historic resources before approving the project, so they cannot substantiate that no additional resources will be used; and 2) they ignored indirect effects on resources that constitute constructive use, failing to avoid and minimize harm as required. The memorandum asserts that the court should grant the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and order compliance with Section 4(f).
This document is an exhibit to a registration statement filed with the U.S. Department of Justice pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act. It provides details on an agreement between the registrant, Davis Goldberg & Galper PLLC, and their foreign principal Dmytro Firtash. Under the agreement, the registrant will provide legal services and representation to Firtash in ongoing legal matters, including working with other legal counsel. At times, services may include correcting public records and advising on media strategies. The document does not disclose any political activities.
This listing is for 36 acres of industrial land located in Spokane, Washington along State Route 2 just west of Airway Heights for $360,000 or $10,000 per acre. The land is level and gently sloping with easy highway access. It has 990 feet of road frontage and is zoned for industrial use with available utilities. The seller owns 109 contiguous acres that are being sold in separate listings, with this listing comprised of several tracts totaling 36 acres that a buyer can acquire all or a portion of.
Master index of all Forms, Litigation Tools, Response Letters, and Exhibits grouped by resource type and then Item Number. Does not include Member Subscription Library content.
This document provides discovery materials to the defendants in a criminal case involving charges related to exporting aircraft parts to Iran. It includes:
1) CDs and images of computer data seized from the defendants containing emails and files.
2) Reports of post-arrest interviews of the two defendants.
3) Notification that physical documents and items seized can be inspected by the defendants, and copies of documents ordered.
4) A request for reciprocal discovery from the defendants and commitment to provide ongoing discovery required by law, including Brady and Giglio materials.
The court sustained the debtor's objection to Great American Appetizers' PACA claim. While the vegetables Great American used as ingredients could qualify for PACA protection, the court found that Great American's manufacturing processes transformed the vegetables into foods of a different kind and character. Specifically, the breading process introduced new allergens and nutrients and significantly altered the appearance, texture, and flavor of the finished products. As a result, the court determined the finished products did not qualify for PACA protection.
Evidence of Obama administration illegal detention and deportation of childre...Bryan Johnson
This document is a declaration by Lindsay Harris in support of a motion to enforce the Flores settlement agreement and for appointment of a special master. It discusses violations of the Flores settlement observed during monitoring visits to CBP facilities in the Rio Grande Valley sector in January and March 2016. Some key points made in the 3-page declaration include:
- Unaccompanied minors and minors detained with their parents were being held in CBP facilities beyond the 72-hour period permitted by the settlement.
- Minors did not have access to basic hygiene items such as soap, toothbrushes, and clean clothing.
- The facilities were overcrowded and unsanitary, with minors sleeping on floors
Evidence of Obama administration illegal detention and deportation of childre...Bryan Johnson
This document is a declaration from Alex Mensing in support of a motion to enforce settlement of the Flores v. Johnson case. It includes exhibits related to conditions for detained immigrant children. The declaration describes experiences visiting immigrant youth detention facilities. It notes issues such as inadequate food and water, unsanitary conditions, lack of educational and recreational activities, and failure to provide necessary medical care to detained children. Overall, the declaration provides evidence that immigration detention centers are not following the terms of the Flores settlement agreement and are failing to meet basic standards of care for detained immigrant youth.
Defendants' brief in opposition to plaintiffs' temporary injunction motions (...TravisBubenik
The document is an opposition brief to a motion for a temporary injunction filed against an executive order issued by the El Paso County Judge in response to rising COVID-19 cases. It argues that the County Judge had authority under the Texas Disaster Act to issue the order and that the plaintiffs and intervenor-plaintiff are unlikely to succeed on the merits of their legal challenge. It also argues that the Governor exceeded his authority by suspending portions of the Act that grant emergency powers to local officials.
La Présidence paie 100 millions de FCFA à un Cabinet américain pour justifier...leral
This document is an exhibit to a registration statement filed with the U.S. Department of Justice pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act. It provides details about the foreign principal, the Republic of Senegal, and the registrant's work on its behalf, including that the registrant deals with Senegal's President Abdoulaye Wade and represents the Office of the President. It is signed by a partner at the registrant law firm to confirm the accuracy of the information.
- The United States filed a lawsuit against Osceola County, Florida and the County's Supervisor of Elections alleging violations of the Voting Rights Act related to the County's at-large method of electing members to its Board of Commissioners.
- The County's population grew dramatically between 1980 and 2000, with Hispanics becoming an increasingly large portion of residents. No Hispanic candidate had ever been elected to the Board using the at-large system.
- In the 1990s, Hispanic leaders pushed for a change to a single-member district system and voters approved such a change in 1992. However, the County later took steps to abolish the single-member districts and return to at-large voting, including
Over het dossier Eurosystem Hospitalier (ESH) is het laatste woord nog niet gezegd. Zo blijkt uit een telex uit 1976 dat Kissinger het dossier opvolgde.
Evidence of Obama administration illegal detention and deportation of childre...Bryan Johnson
This document describes the experiences of a 13-year-old boy from El Salvador, Walter A, who was detained in the U.S. along with his mother and younger brother after fleeing threats from gang members in their home country. After being apprehended near the Texas border, they were held in cold, unsanitary border patrol stations for around 2 days with minimal food and blankets and no information about their legal rights. Walter, his mother, and brother were separated and transferred to a second, even colder facility holding them in cages with no discussion of legal rights under the Flores settlement.
Table 2-4-1 determines reporting requirements for methyl bromide fumigations. Table 2-4-2 determines the number of thermocouples needed to monitor fumigation temperature. Several tables provide guidance for determining gas concentration values, need for extended exposure, and responsibility for aerating commodities after methyl bromide fumigation.
This document is a consultancy agreement between Dickens & Madson Canada, Inc. and the Kyrgyz Republic. It outlines lobbying and public relations services to be provided to influence policies in the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other countries in support of Kyrgyzstan. The agreement is for $1 million USD, with an initial payment of $500,000 received. Upon final payment, Dickens & Madson will lobby executive and legislative branches to obtain financial assistance for Kyrgyzstan related to COVID-19, arrange meetings between Kyrgyz and US officials, and seek cooperation on security, economic and technological issues. They will also lobby for investments in Kyrgyzstan's agriculture, infrastructure
Evidence of Obama administration illegal detention and deportation of childre...Bryan Johnson
This document is a collection of 69 declarations from individuals in support of a motion to enforce settlement of the Flores v. Johnson case. The declarations describe conditions in CBP holding cells (hieleras) and immigration detention centers. Declarants provide first-hand accounts of experiences in these facilities, including descriptions of cold temperatures, lack of beds, inadequate food and water, unsanitary conditions, lack of medical care, and verbal and physical abuse from staff. The declarations also allege denial of due process rights. The document is intended to provide evidence of ongoing violations of the Flores Settlement Agreement.
Evidence of Obama administration illegal detention and deportation of childre...Bryan Johnson
This declaration describes the experiences of a 14-year-old Salvadoran boy detained at an immigration detention center in Dilley, Texas along with his mother. They fled El Salvador after he was threatened with death for refusing to join a gang and his mother was threatened for refusing to pay extortion money to a gang. They presented themselves to U.S. authorities shortly after entering the U.S. and have since been detained for over two weeks without being informed about potential release options or the possibility of being released to family members in the U.S.
Llanera presenta borrador ordenanza transparenciaCsAsturias
El concejal Alfonso Cicero de Ciudadanos presenta el borrador de la Ordenanza de Transparencia en Llanera y confía en que la Comisión correspondiente se reunirá este mes para que los otros grupos políticos puedan aportar propuestas. Cicero anuncia que el borrador estará disponible para que los ciudadanos lo consulten. Reconoce que puede ser necesario destinar fondos presupuestarios para aplicar la ordenanza y formar al personal, para que los vecinos puedan acceder a la información de forma gratuita y dinámica
El Colegio Nacional Nicolás Esguerra busca construir un futuro mejor para sus estudiantes. Ubicado en la dirección Juan Fernando Reyes Galeano 904, el Colegio Nacional Nicolás Esguerra se enfoca en brindar una educación de calidad que permita a sus estudiantes desarrollar todo su potencial.
This document is an amicus curiae memorandum submitted in a lawsuit regarding the Honolulu High-Capacity Transit Corridor Project. It argues that the defendants violated Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act in two ways: 1) they failed to fully identify all historic resources before approving the project, so they cannot substantiate that no additional resources will be used; and 2) they ignored indirect effects on resources that constitute constructive use, failing to avoid and minimize harm as required. The memorandum asserts that the court should grant the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and order compliance with Section 4(f).
This document is an exhibit to a registration statement filed with the U.S. Department of Justice pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act. It provides details on an agreement between the registrant, Davis Goldberg & Galper PLLC, and their foreign principal Dmytro Firtash. Under the agreement, the registrant will provide legal services and representation to Firtash in ongoing legal matters, including working with other legal counsel. At times, services may include correcting public records and advising on media strategies. The document does not disclose any political activities.
This listing is for 36 acres of industrial land located in Spokane, Washington along State Route 2 just west of Airway Heights for $360,000 or $10,000 per acre. The land is level and gently sloping with easy highway access. It has 990 feet of road frontage and is zoned for industrial use with available utilities. The seller owns 109 contiguous acres that are being sold in separate listings, with this listing comprised of several tracts totaling 36 acres that a buyer can acquire all or a portion of.
Master index of all Forms, Litigation Tools, Response Letters, and Exhibits grouped by resource type and then Item Number. Does not include Member Subscription Library content.
This document provides discovery materials to the defendants in a criminal case involving charges related to exporting aircraft parts to Iran. It includes:
1) CDs and images of computer data seized from the defendants containing emails and files.
2) Reports of post-arrest interviews of the two defendants.
3) Notification that physical documents and items seized can be inspected by the defendants, and copies of documents ordered.
4) A request for reciprocal discovery from the defendants and commitment to provide ongoing discovery required by law, including Brady and Giglio materials.
The court sustained the debtor's objection to Great American Appetizers' PACA claim. While the vegetables Great American used as ingredients could qualify for PACA protection, the court found that Great American's manufacturing processes transformed the vegetables into foods of a different kind and character. Specifically, the breading process introduced new allergens and nutrients and significantly altered the appearance, texture, and flavor of the finished products. As a result, the court determined the finished products did not qualify for PACA protection.
Evidence of Obama administration illegal detention and deportation of childre...Bryan Johnson
This document is a declaration by Lindsay Harris in support of a motion to enforce the Flores settlement agreement and for appointment of a special master. It discusses violations of the Flores settlement observed during monitoring visits to CBP facilities in the Rio Grande Valley sector in January and March 2016. Some key points made in the 3-page declaration include:
- Unaccompanied minors and minors detained with their parents were being held in CBP facilities beyond the 72-hour period permitted by the settlement.
- Minors did not have access to basic hygiene items such as soap, toothbrushes, and clean clothing.
- The facilities were overcrowded and unsanitary, with minors sleeping on floors
Evidence of Obama administration illegal detention and deportation of childre...Bryan Johnson
This document is a declaration from Alex Mensing in support of a motion to enforce settlement of the Flores v. Johnson case. It includes exhibits related to conditions for detained immigrant children. The declaration describes experiences visiting immigrant youth detention facilities. It notes issues such as inadequate food and water, unsanitary conditions, lack of educational and recreational activities, and failure to provide necessary medical care to detained children. Overall, the declaration provides evidence that immigration detention centers are not following the terms of the Flores settlement agreement and are failing to meet basic standards of care for detained immigrant youth.
Defendants' brief in opposition to plaintiffs' temporary injunction motions (...TravisBubenik
The document is an opposition brief to a motion for a temporary injunction filed against an executive order issued by the El Paso County Judge in response to rising COVID-19 cases. It argues that the County Judge had authority under the Texas Disaster Act to issue the order and that the plaintiffs and intervenor-plaintiff are unlikely to succeed on the merits of their legal challenge. It also argues that the Governor exceeded his authority by suspending portions of the Act that grant emergency powers to local officials.
La Présidence paie 100 millions de FCFA à un Cabinet américain pour justifier...leral
This document is an exhibit to a registration statement filed with the U.S. Department of Justice pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act. It provides details about the foreign principal, the Republic of Senegal, and the registrant's work on its behalf, including that the registrant deals with Senegal's President Abdoulaye Wade and represents the Office of the President. It is signed by a partner at the registrant law firm to confirm the accuracy of the information.
- The United States filed a lawsuit against Osceola County, Florida and the County's Supervisor of Elections alleging violations of the Voting Rights Act related to the County's at-large method of electing members to its Board of Commissioners.
- The County's population grew dramatically between 1980 and 2000, with Hispanics becoming an increasingly large portion of residents. No Hispanic candidate had ever been elected to the Board using the at-large system.
- In the 1990s, Hispanic leaders pushed for a change to a single-member district system and voters approved such a change in 1992. However, the County later took steps to abolish the single-member districts and return to at-large voting, including
Over het dossier Eurosystem Hospitalier (ESH) is het laatste woord nog niet gezegd. Zo blijkt uit een telex uit 1976 dat Kissinger het dossier opvolgde.
Evidence of Obama administration illegal detention and deportation of childre...Bryan Johnson
This document describes the experiences of a 13-year-old boy from El Salvador, Walter A, who was detained in the U.S. along with his mother and younger brother after fleeing threats from gang members in their home country. After being apprehended near the Texas border, they were held in cold, unsanitary border patrol stations for around 2 days with minimal food and blankets and no information about their legal rights. Walter, his mother, and brother were separated and transferred to a second, even colder facility holding them in cages with no discussion of legal rights under the Flores settlement.
Table 2-4-1 determines reporting requirements for methyl bromide fumigations. Table 2-4-2 determines the number of thermocouples needed to monitor fumigation temperature. Several tables provide guidance for determining gas concentration values, need for extended exposure, and responsibility for aerating commodities after methyl bromide fumigation.
This document is a consultancy agreement between Dickens & Madson Canada, Inc. and the Kyrgyz Republic. It outlines lobbying and public relations services to be provided to influence policies in the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other countries in support of Kyrgyzstan. The agreement is for $1 million USD, with an initial payment of $500,000 received. Upon final payment, Dickens & Madson will lobby executive and legislative branches to obtain financial assistance for Kyrgyzstan related to COVID-19, arrange meetings between Kyrgyz and US officials, and seek cooperation on security, economic and technological issues. They will also lobby for investments in Kyrgyzstan's agriculture, infrastructure
Evidence of Obama administration illegal detention and deportation of childre...Bryan Johnson
This document is a collection of 69 declarations from individuals in support of a motion to enforce settlement of the Flores v. Johnson case. The declarations describe conditions in CBP holding cells (hieleras) and immigration detention centers. Declarants provide first-hand accounts of experiences in these facilities, including descriptions of cold temperatures, lack of beds, inadequate food and water, unsanitary conditions, lack of medical care, and verbal and physical abuse from staff. The declarations also allege denial of due process rights. The document is intended to provide evidence of ongoing violations of the Flores Settlement Agreement.
Evidence of Obama administration illegal detention and deportation of childre...Bryan Johnson
This declaration describes the experiences of a 14-year-old Salvadoran boy detained at an immigration detention center in Dilley, Texas along with his mother. They fled El Salvador after he was threatened with death for refusing to join a gang and his mother was threatened for refusing to pay extortion money to a gang. They presented themselves to U.S. authorities shortly after entering the U.S. and have since been detained for over two weeks without being informed about potential release options or the possibility of being released to family members in the U.S.
Llanera presenta borrador ordenanza transparenciaCsAsturias
El concejal Alfonso Cicero de Ciudadanos presenta el borrador de la Ordenanza de Transparencia en Llanera y confía en que la Comisión correspondiente se reunirá este mes para que los otros grupos políticos puedan aportar propuestas. Cicero anuncia que el borrador estará disponible para que los ciudadanos lo consulten. Reconoce que puede ser necesario destinar fondos presupuestarios para aplicar la ordenanza y formar al personal, para que los vecinos puedan acceder a la información de forma gratuita y dinámica
El Colegio Nacional Nicolás Esguerra busca construir un futuro mejor para sus estudiantes. Ubicado en la dirección Juan Fernando Reyes Galeano 904, el Colegio Nacional Nicolás Esguerra se enfoca en brindar una educación de calidad que permita a sus estudiantes desarrollar todo su potencial.
El documento trata sobre la pasión de la persona por los niños y su deseo de convertirse en maestra de guardería. Explica que le gusta pasar tiempo con los niños pequeños como su primo y que le gustaría estudiar pedagogía infantil. También menciona algunas cualidades importantes para ser una excelente maestra de guardería como la paciencia, el amor por los niños, la dedicación y brindarles cariño y una buena educación desde pequeños.
Este documento describe la técnica del lay up en baloncesto. Explica que el lay up implica lanzar el balón hacia el canasto con una sola mano desde cerca. Detalla cuatro tipos de lay up y los pasos para realizar un lay up regular, incluyendo el patrón de pies "derecha-izquierda-salto" y mantener el balón simétrico al piso. Finalmente, introduce conceptos matemáticos como ángulos y porcentajes para referirse a la secuencia de pasos y optimizar la precisión del tiro.
CigarTower has been the leading cigar retailer and distributor in Hungary since 1996, introducing major Cuban brands and educating customers about cigar culture through their store, events, and media publications. They have helped grow the Hungarian cigar community to include thousands of enthusiasts worldwide and established Hungary's cigar industry through their sponsorships, lobbying efforts, and international representations over the past 13 years.
Boudicca reminisces about marching along the Icknield way and passing through various towns and villages in Norfolk, England. As she descends to the cold seashore, she notes the sounds of sea birds and smells of lavender in the air. However, Boudicca's tone shifts as she calls out to Rome in desperation, expressing a desire to unleash destruction through blood and fire after they took away her motherhood and Iceni identity, as symbolized by her torc necklace made of twisted gold and silver.
Este documento presenta 5 preguntas sobre protocolos de internet como HTTP y HTTPS y sobre servidores web y de aplicaciones. Pregunta sobre la relación entre HTTP y HTML, la naturaleza sin estado de HTTP y sus implicaciones, y por qué no todas las aplicaciones web requieren HTTPS. También pide un cuadro comparando y contrastando las diferencias y semejanzas entre servidores web y de aplicaciones.
Este documento narra la historia de un personaje que vive en el bosque y cuida de mantenerlo ordenado y limpio. Un día, mientras recogía basura, observó a una niña vestida de rojo que entró al bosque y comenzó a cortar flores sin permiso. Aunque la niña parecía honesta, mató a un mosquito sin remordimiento. El personaje decidió darle una lección para enseñarle que no se puede ingresar al bosque y maltratar a sus habitantes sin aviso.
Pueblo kichwa de rukullacta rechaza presencia depetrolera ivanhoe en su terri...Crónicas del despojo
El Pueblo Kichwa de Rukullakta, una comunidad ecuatoriana de aproximadamente 8,000 habitantes, rechazó la presencia de la compañía petrolera Ivanhoe Energy Ecuador en su territorio ancestral. En una carta entregada a Ivanhoe, el pueblo ratificó su posición de no permitir actividades petroleras en su tierra y denunció que el gobierno ecuatoriano otorgó la concesión a Ivanhoe sin su consentimiento previo. El pueblo desea proteger su forma de vida tradicional y el medio ambiente natural del que depend
La presentación trata sobre cómo crear presentaciones. Se menciona crear una presentación en blanco como el primer paso para comenzar una nueva presentación.
The poem describes different scenes of nature that could represent the speaker - an eager goldfinch flitting through hawthorn, a secretive dash across a dark lake's troubled surface reflecting the dying sun, gathering swallows scissoring the night sky in late autumn seeking home, or spring's cold earth exploding in lush green after winter's fast. The speaker seems to find their identity or presence in the natural world's seasonal changes and cycles.
The document outlines an immersion day for Furness College students, including sessions reviewing a mock exam, focusing on writing skills and exam practice. Students will arrive at 11:50am and depart at 4pm, with the day consisting of 3 sessions addressing time management, developing comments on textual features, and practicing exam questions.
El documento presenta varias citas de autores que discuten temas como el turismo, la mercadotecnia, la necesidad de la carrera de bibliotecología y la historia de las bacterias. También incluye instrucciones sobre cómo citar un capítulo completo y una lista de referencias bibliográficas.
La celebración del día de la energía destaca los beneficios de las energías limpias como la reducción de gases de efecto invernadero al disminuir el uso de combustibles fósiles, mejorar la salud pública y diversificar la matriz energética nacional.
The document is a court order from a federal district court in Indiana regarding a lawsuit challenging certain requirements of Indiana's law regulating e-liquid manufacturers. The order:
1) Details the requirements under Indiana's law that e-liquid manufacturers must have a manufacturing permit issued by the state's Alcohol and Tobacco Commission and contract with a single security firm meeting certain qualifications.
2) Notes the plaintiff GoodCat LLC's challenge to the security firm requirements as unconstitutional, as well as the federal government's increased regulation of e-liquids under recent FDA rules.
3) Provides background on GoodCat, Indiana's law, and the federal regulatory framework for e-liquids.
The document appears to be part of a registration form submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. It provides information about the registrant such as their name and address, as well as details about the foreign principal they are representing such as their name, address, and whether they are a foreign government, political party, or other type of organization. It requests additional information if the foreign principal is a foreign political party or non-governmental organization.
This document is a registration statement filed by JD.com, Inc. with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for an initial public offering of American
Depositary Shares (ADSs).
The following is a summary of key details from the document in 3 sentences or less:
JD.com, Inc. operates as China's largest online direct sales company, offering products through its website and mobile apps. It has built a large fulfillment
infrastructure and technology platform to provide fast delivery and customer service. Through this filing, JD.com aims to list its ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange
to raise funds from public investors.
2020 Georgia General Assembly Legislative Report (by committee)Beth B. Moore
A list of all the bills that passed both chambers of the Georgia Legislature and are now heading to Governor Brian Kemp's desk. He now has 40 days to either sign the bills into law or veto them. If he chooses to do nothing with a particular bill, that bill will automatically become law.
The document provides information about a public meeting to discuss the impact of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) on commercial activities involving "Schedule 1" chemicals. It announces the meeting date and agenda, provides call-in details, and requests public comments. BIS will use the comments to prepare its annual certification to Congress that legitimate commercial interests are not being harmed by CWC implementation. The meeting will include discussions on project planning, other business, and the next meeting date. Public comments may be submitted by mail or email.
FTC Charges Volkswagen Deceived Consumers with Its “Clean Diesel” CampaignAutoblog.it
In a complaint filed in federal court, the FTC alleges that during this seven-year period Volkswagen deceived consumers by selling or leasing more than 550,000 diesel cars based on false claims that the cars were low-emission, environmentally friendly, met emissions standards and would maintain a high resale value. The cars sold for an average price of approximately $28,000.
This document is an exhibit to a registration statement filed with the U.S. Department of Justice pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act. It provides details about the foreign principal, Andrii Artemenko of Ukraine, and the nature of the agreement between him and the registrant, Armstrong & Associates, LLC. Specifically, it states that Artemenko is an individual citizen of Ukraine seeking to advance US-Ukraine relations, and that there is no formal written contract between the parties.
Texas Cigarette, Cigar and Tobacco Products Report Formstaxman taxman
This document provides instructions for Texas distributors to report interstate cigarette sales to the Comptroller of Public Accounts. Distributors must complete a Texas Distributor Report of Interstate Sales of Cigarettes for each state they sold cigarettes to during the reporting period and attach it to their monthly cigarette tax report. The interstate sales report requires distributors to provide details of each out-of-state customer such as name, address, invoice numbers, dates and quantities of cigarettes purchased.
CPSC's Guidelines for voluntary recall noticesAndy Dabydeen
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) proposes an interpretive rule to provide principles and guidelines for voluntary recall notices issued as part of corrective action plans. The rule would clarify that recall notices should contain information similar to what is required for mandatory recalls, such as descriptions of the product, hazard, injuries, actions being taken, and remedy. The rule would also specify that corrective action plans may include compliance program requirements when appropriate. The CPSC believes the rule would result in more efficient recall negotiations, predictability for companies, and timelier public notification of recalls.
This complaint challenges an official opinion by the Indiana Attorney General that attempts to unilaterally reclassify popular low-THC hemp extracts like Delta-8 THC as Schedule I controlled substances, contrary to established state and federal law. The complaint argues that both Indiana and federal law define hemp and its derivatives as legal agricultural commodities as long as their THC concentration is below 0.3%, and that the Attorney General's opinion improperly attempts to override these laws and turn thousands of farmers, businesses and consumers into criminals overnight. The plaintiffs, including a major hemp product manufacturer and a hemp industry trade group, are seeking declaratory and injunctive relief preventing enforcement of the Attorney General's opinion.
The document summarizes amendments made to regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations pertaining to veterans' claims and benefits. Key points:
1) Amendments are made to clarify beginning and ending dates of wars for determining veterans' benefits eligibility and revising cross references.
2) Regulations related to the Spanish-American War, Boxer Rebellion, and Philippine Insurrection are amended to specify how periods of service and leave are calculated.
3) Several sections are revised or revoked to remove duplicative or unnecessary information.
This document is a bill that proposes amendments to the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946. If passed, it would require the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a national disclosure standard for bioengineered foods. Some key points:
- It would define terms like "bioengineering" and establish that foods containing genetically modified materials are subject to disclosure requirements.
- The Secretary of Agriculture would be required to promulgate regulations within 2 years to implement a mandatory national standard for disclosing whether a food is bioengineered.
- The standard would preempt any state or local labeling requirements regarding genetically engineered foods. However, it would preserve the authority of other federal agencies and any remedies under state/federal law.
This document proposes revisions to certain State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) program reporting requirements established in 2009. It extends the deadline for states to collect and publicly report SFSF data to January 31, 2012. It also proposes a priority for future Department of Education discretionary grants to states that developed statewide longitudinal data systems required under SFSF by the deadline. Additionally, it reminds grantees that the Department may identify them as high-risk and impose sanctions for failing to meet program requirements, and may take enforcement action against states failing to meet certain SFSF indicator requirements.
This document is a form for reporting interstate sales of cigars and tobacco products to the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. The form includes instructions for distributors to provide information such as their taxpayer number, name, address, the state where interstate sales occurred, purchaser details including name, address and invoice numbers, product class and quantity sold, and manufacturer's list price. Distributors must submit this form along with their monthly cigar and tobacco products tax report to claim deductions for interstate sales.
Администрация Президента Петра Порошенко для продвижения интересов Украины наняла компанию BGR Group, основанную бывшим председателем комитета Республиканской партии США и губернатором штата Миссисипи Хейли Барбур
A new rule from the federal Environmental Protection Agency. Called "Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Oil and Gas Extraction Point," the new rule prevents municipal sewage treatment plants from process shale wastewater.
The Drug Enforcement Administration is raising the production quota for marijuana that is ordered by the federal government.
The National Institute on Drug Abuse produces marijuana for the purpose of research. The DEA is giving the agency permission to produce up to 600 kilograms of marijuana this year.
"The aggregate production quota for marijuana should be increased in order to provide a continuous and uninterrupted supply of marijuana in support of DEA-registered researchers who are approved by the federal government to utilize marijuana in their research protocols," the agency wrote.
This document provides the table of contents for the 2009 edition of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code. It lists the titles, chapters, and sections contained within the code and provides a brief introduction noting that changes from the 81st Texas Legislature session have been incorporated. Contact information is provided for reporting any errors found in the edition.
1. Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
Federal Reporter or U.S.App.D.C. Reports. Users are requested to notify the
Clerk of any formal errors in order that corrections may be made before the
bound volumes go to press.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Argued January 11, 2010 Decided March 26, 2010
No. 09-5099
PRIME TIME INTERNATIONAL COMPANY,
FORMERLY KNOWN AS SINGLE STICK, INC.,
APPELLANT
v.
THOMAS J. VILSACK, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE AND
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
APPELLEES
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia
(No. 1:06-cv-01077)
Reed Rubinstein and Mark Solomons argued the cause and
filed the briefs for appellant.
Sydney A. Foster, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice,
argued the cause for appellee. With her on the brief were Mark
B. Stern, Attorney. R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney,
entered an appearance.
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 1 of 16
2. 2
Before: ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges, and
EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge: In 2004 Congress enacted the Fair
and Equitable Tobacco Reform Act (“FETRA”), 7 U.S.C. § 518
et seq., repealing a system of quotas and price supports for
tobacco production and providing for payments for ten years to
producers and persons who had established marketing quotas to
ease the transition. These payments are funded by quarterly
assessments on manufacturers and importers of tobacco
products. Prime Time International Company, a manufacturer
of small cigars, challenged its assessments for three quarters of
FY 2005, asserting claims under FETRA, the Information
Quality Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3516 note, and the Due Process Clause
of the Constitution. The district court granted summary
judgment to the Secretary and Department of Agriculture on the
FETRA and due process claims, and dismissed the IQA claim
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure
to state a claim. Our review is de novo, and we affirm in part
and reverse in part.
I.
Upon“repeal[ing]allaspectsoftheFederaltobaccosupport
program,” H.R. REP. NO. 108-755, at 440 (2004) (Conf. Rep.),
reprinted in 2004 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1341, 1518, Congress
established a ten-year transitional program under which the
United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) continues
to make payments to farmers formerly covered by marketing
quotas. 7 U.S.C. § 518e. The payments come from a newly
established Tobacco Trust Fund in the Commodity Credit
Corporation at USDA. Id. § 518e(a). The Trust Fund is
supported by quarterly assessments on tobacco manufacturers
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 2 of 16
3. 3
1
Chapter 52 exempts from taxation several classes of
tobacco, including: “Tobacco products furnished for employee use or
experimental purposes”; “Tobacco products and cigarette papers and
tubes transferred or removed in bond from domestic factories and
exportwarehouses”;“Tobaccoproductsandcigarettepapersandtubes
released in bond from customs custody”; and “Tobacco products and
and importers. Id. § 518d(b). Under FETRA, assessments are
to be allocated among manufacturers and importers of six types
oftobacco:cigarettes,cigars,snuff,roll-your-own,chewing,and
pipe. Id. § 518d(c). The allocation within each class of tobacco
product “shall be . . . on a pro rata basis . . . based on each
manufacturer’s or importer’s share of gross domestic volume,”
with “[n]o manufacturer or importer . . . required to pay an
assessment that is based on a share that is in excess of [its] share
of domestic volume.” Id. § 518d(e)(1), (2). An individual
manufacturer’s or importer’s assessment within a class of
tobacco product is determined by multiplying its market share
of the tobacco class by the total amount of the assessment for the
tobacco class. Id. § 518d(f). “Market share” is defined as “the
share of each manufacturer or importer of a class of tobacco
product . . . of the total volume of domestic sales of the class of
tobacco product during the base period for a fiscal year for an
assessment . . . .” Id. § 518d(a)(3).
Congress set the class allocations for FY 2005, see id.
§ 518d(c)(1), while authorizing the Secretary of Agriculture to
adjust the allocations in subsequent years “to reflect changes in
the share of gross domestic volume held by that class of tobacco
product,” id. § 518d(c)(2). Gross domestic volume is defined as
“the volume of tobacco products removed (as defined by section
5702 of Title 26)” and “not exempt from tax under chapter 52 of
Title 26 at the time of their removal under that chapter or the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States,” neither of
which is germane.1
Id. § 518d(a)(2). “[R]emoved,” as used by
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 3 of 16
4. 4
cigarette papers and tubes exported and returned.” 26 U.S.C. § 5704.
“The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States . . . is
maintained and published periodically by the United States
International Trade Commission.” 19 U.S.C. § 1202; see Chapter 24,
Tobacco & Manufactured Tobacco Substitutes (2010), available at
http://www.usitc.gov/publications/docs/tata/hts/bychapter/1000C24.
pdf.
2
“Removal” or “remove” is defined as:
the removal of tobacco products or cigarette papers or
tubes, or any processed tobacco, from the factory or
frominternal revenue bond under section 5704, as the
Secretary shall by regulation prescribe, or release
from customs custody, and shall also include the
smuggling or other unlawful importation of such
articles into the United States.
26 U.S.C. § 5702(j) (emphasis added).
FETRA, means “the removal of tobacco products or cigarette
papers or tubes, or any processed tobacco, from the factory . . .
or release from customs custody.” 26 U.S.C. § 5702(j).2
A
manufacturer or importer may appeal its assessment to the
Secretary, using “any information that is available, including
third party data on industry or individual company sales
volumes,” and the Secretary “must make any revisions
necessary to ensure that each manufacturer and importer pays
only its correct pro rata share of total gross domestic volume
from all sources.” Id. § 518d(i)(2), (i)(4)(B).
As interpreted by USDA, FETRA creates a two-step process
for determining the amount of each manufacturer’s or importer’s
quarterly assessment. First, assessments are allocated among six
classes of tobacco. Id. § 518d(c); 7 C.F.R. § 1463.5. For FY
2005, Congress apportioned 2.783% of the total assessment to
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 4 of 16
5. 5
the cigar class. 7 U.S.C. § 518d(c)(1)(B). Second, USDA
allocates each class’s share among individual manufacturers and
importers based on market share, which turns on the “volume of
domestic sales.” See id. § 518d(f), (a)(3). For cigarette and cigar
companies, the “volume of domestic sales” is, according to
USDA, determined solely by the number of cigarettes and cigars,
without differentiating between large and small cigars. USDA
relies on section 518d(g)(3)(A), which provides that “the
volumes of domestic sales shall be measured by — in the case of
cigarettes and cigars, the number of cigarettes and cigars.” See
also 7 C.F.R. § 1463.7(b)(1). For “other classes of tobacco
products,” the measurement of the “volumes of domestic sales”
shall be “in terms of number of pounds, or fraction thereof, of
those products.” 7 U.S.C. § 518d(g)(3)(B); see also 7 C.F.R.
§ 1463.7(b)(2). USDA obtains the data needed for these
calculations from copies of tax and customs forms (listing the
number of cigarettes and cigars and numbers of pounds of other
tobacco products “removed” into domestic commerce) that are
filed with the Treasury Department and the Department of
Homeland Security and submitted to USDA by manufacturers
and importers. See 7 U.S.C. § 518d(h)(1), (2); 7 C.F.R.
§ 1463.7(b).
Prime Time is a manufacturer of “small” cigars, which
weigh less than three pounds per thousand cigars. Cf. 26 U.S.C.
§ 5701(a)(1) (defining “small cigars”). For FY 2005, USDA
initially assessed Prime Time $339,719 for the first quarter based
on a market share for the cigar class of 4.81%; $455,374 for the
second quarter based on a market share of 6.45%; and
$1,152,530 for the third quarter based on a market share of
7.78%. Prime Time filed an administrative appeal of its
assessments to the Secretary pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 518d(i),
arguing that USDA’s per-stick approach improperly treated
differently sized cigars similarly and submitted verifiable A.C.
Nielsen sales data as an alternative source for calculating its
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 5 of 16
6. 6
market share. The Secretary, acting through the Deputy
Administrator for Farm Programs, acknowledged that Prime
Time’s objection to the inequity of assessing large and small
cigars equally was “philosophically well founded,” but took the
position that the per-stick method was mandated by section
518d(g)(3)(A) of FETRA. Letter Decision of Feb. 8, 2006 at 4.
The Secretary also took the position that A.C. Nielsen data,
whichmeasuresacross-the-counter salesoftobaccoproducts,did
not conform to the requirement that market share calculations be
based on the amount of product “removed.” See id. at 6. The
Secretary agreed,however,that Prime Time correctly challenged
both the exclusion of non-reporting manufacturers and importers
inapportioningassessments andthe inclusionofcertainexpenses
incalculatingassessmentsunderthetransitionpaymentprogram.
The Secretary rejected Prime Time’s claim that it was entitled as
a matter of due process to examine the industry-wide tax and
customs data used by USDA to calculate the assessments on the
ground that such information about other companies was made
confidential by statute, see 26 U.S.C. § 6103. As subsequently
revised, Prime Time’s FY 2005 assessments for the first, second,
and third quarters were $351,007.23, $472,017.47, and
$1,135,353.46, respectively.
Prime Time petitioned for review in the district court
pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 518d(j). The district court granted
summary judgment for the Secretary and USDA. Single Stick,
Inc. v. Johanns, 601 F. Supp. 2d 307 (D.D.C. 2009). The district
court deferred to USDA’s interpretation of FETRA that the per-
stick method of determining market share was statutorily
mandated as not contrary to congressional intent and a
permissible interpretation of the statute under Chevron U.S.A.,
Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837
(1984). Single Stick, 601 F. Supp. 2d at 314. It rejected Prime
Time’s due process claimregarding access to the data underlying
the Secretary’s assessments because Prime Time failed to
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 6 of 16
7. 7
demonstrate prejudice. Id. at 315. Finally, it dismissed Prime
Time’s claim that USDA’s failure to respond to requests for
disclosure and “correction” of the data underlying the
assessments violated the Information Quality Act (“IQA”), 44
U.S.C. § 3516 note, ruling that the IQA did not vest any party
with the right to disclosure and correction and that USDA’s
failure to respond did not constitute final agency action subject
to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5
U.S.C. § 704. Single Stick, 601 F. Supp. 2d at 316–17. Prime
Time appeals, and this court’s review is de novo, “as if the
agency’s decision had been appealed to this court directly.”
Gerber v. Norton, 294 F.3d 173, 178 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (internal
quotation marks omitted).
II.
Prime Time contends that USDA’s interpretation of the Fair
and Equitable Tobacco Reform Act is contrary to ordinary
construction and plain meaning of the word “volume” in the
phrase “gross domestic volume,” which is defined in section
518d(a)(2) as the “volume of tobacco products — removed (as
defined by section 5702 of Title 26)” and “not exempt from tax”
pursuant to provisions not relevant to this appeal, supra note 1.
It observes that where statutory terms, such as “volume” here,
are not defined in a statute, courts give them their ordinary
meaning, citing Asgrow Seed Co. v. Winterboer, 513 U.S. 179,
187 (1995). USDA responds that “volume” is “clearly
explained” in FETRA to mean the number of cigars because
section 518d(g)(3) provides that the number of cigars determines
the “volume of domestic sales” and thus “market share” under
section 518d(f).
Prime Time replies that under USDA’s elastic construction
it has calculated the cigar class’s share of gross domestic volume
at step one by separately calculating the excise tax paid on large
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 7 of 16
8. 8
and small cigars and then adding the two amounts. See 70 Fed.
Reg. 7007, 7008 (Table 1) (Feb. 10, 2005). But then, at step two,
USDA calculates the market shares for individual manufacturers
and importers based on their share of the “commingled number
of large and small cigars.” Reply Br. 5. This skips a necessary
step, Prime Time maintains, because FETRA requires that the
allocation within a tobacco class be “on a pro rata basis” with
“[n]o manufacturer or importer . . . required to pay an assessment
that is based on a share that is in excess of the manufacturer’s or
importer’s share of domestic volume.” 7 U.S.C. § 518d(e).
Therefore, it argues, after allocating the assessment by class of
tobacco products, USDA should divide the cigar class
assessment into sub-classes of large and small cigars, with the
relative allocation determined by total weight, and then divide
the assessments among individual large and small cigar
manufacturers and importers on a per-stick basis from the sub-
divided assessments, satisfying subsection (g)(3)(A). Prime
Time contends such a method is required by the plain text of
subsection (e) as well as subsection (i)(4)(B), which, upon
administrative appeal, requires the Secretary to “make any
revisions necessary to ensure that each manufacturer and
importer pays only its correct pro rata share of total gross
domestic volume from all sources.”
In interpreting a statute, the court begins with the text, and
employs“traditionaltoolsofstatutoryconstruction” todetermine
whether Congress has spoken directly to the issue. See Chevron,
467 U.S. at 842–43 & n.9. If so, the court’s task is at an end.
See id. at 842–43. USDA construes section 518d(g)(3)(A) of
FETRA to mandate the per-stick method for apportioning
assessments among individual manufacturers and importers
within the cigarette and cigar class without first sub-dividing the
cigar class into large and small cigars. In its view “[t]he statute
could hardly be more explicit.” Appellees’ Br. 15. It suggests
Swisher Int’l Inc. v. Schafer, 550 F.3d 1046 (11th Cir. 2008),
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 8 of 16
9. 9
cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 71 (2009), supports this interpretation.
However, Swisher provides no analysis, stating only that “[f]or
cigarette and cigar sellers, the individual assessments are
determined by the number of cigarettes and cigars sold,” while
for other tobacco classes, the number of pounds of tobacco is
used. Id. at 1050.
The plain text of FETRA does not self-evidently vindicate
USDA’s two step assessment method. Under FETRA, the
“volume of domestic sales” and “market share” are not
synonymous with “gross domestic volume.” FETRA provides,
for example, that “[t]he volume of domestic sales shall be
calculated based on gross domestic volume,” 7 U.S.C.
§ 518d(g)(2) (emphasis added), indicating two different
meanings for the terms. And section 518d(g)(3)(A) does not, on
its face, require that a compound number of large and small
cigars serve as the denominator when calculating a
manufacturer’s or importer’s volume of domestic sales on a per-
stick basis. Most critically, USDA’s interpretation appears to
ignore the pro-rata-basis limitation Congress imposed on
assessments within a tobacco class in subsection (e). As
interpreted by USDA, it is irrelevant that one large cigar
consumes far more tobacco than a small cigar, and so accounts
for a far larger segment of the market than its per-stick
contribution would indicate. Yet the text and structure of the
statute titled the Fair and Equitable Tobacco Reform Act
suggests an easy counting metric for cigarettes and cigars may
not override a statutory mandate that assessments be “allocated
on a pro rata basis” within each class of tobacco product, id.
§ 518d(e)(1). Prime Time’s interpretation suggests that there is
at least one way to interpret FETRA’s provisions consistently
and in harmony, with none made superfluous or insignificant.
See Corley v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 1558, 1566 (2009); City
of Anaheim, Cal. v. FERC, 558 F.3d 521, 522 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 9 of 16
10. 10
3
Prime Time’s objection to increases in its market share
following its administrative appeal, which is not part of the USDA
record before the court, is subsumed in our remand; we thus expect its
objection will be addressed on remand should the issue arise.
For the purpose of this appeal, the court need only observe
that USDA’s present interpretation is not mandated by the plain
text of FETRA. USDA does not maintain that its interpretation
of FETRA is a permissible view of an ambiguous statute entitled
to deference under Chevron step 2, 467 U.S. at 843. Given that
FETRA does not appear to be susceptible of only a single
interpretation, we reverse and remand to the district court with
instructions to remand Prime Time’s FETRA claims to the
USDA for further proceedings. See PDK Labs. Inc. v. U.S. DEA,
362 F.3d 786, 797–98 (D.C. Cir. 2004).
To the extent Prime Time contends USDA arbitrarily and
capriciously overestimated its market share by relying on
inaccurate data, USDA adequately explained why it rejected
Prime Time’s view that A.C. Nielsen data on industry and
individual sales volumes should be used in lieu of “removal”
data.3
Section 518d(g)(1) directs USDA to calculate the volume
of domestic sales and thus market share using “removal” forms
and tax returns “as well as any other relevant information
provided to or obtained by the Secretary.” Section 518d(i)(2)
also permits manufacturers and importers to use data on
“individual company sales volumes” to challenge their
assessments. While these provisions do not require USDA to
accept such non-“removal” data or change an assessment based
on it, USDA would be advised on remand to offer an explanation
in response to Prime Time’s argument that the discrepancy in
results indicated USDA’s data and calculations were inaccurate.
For the relevant period, the A.C. Nielsen data showed Prime
Time’s market share was between 1.05% and 2.5% as compared
to between 4.81% and 7.78% computed by USDA. In ruling on
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 10 of 16
11. 11
Prime Time’s administrative appeal, the Secretary pointed out
that A.C. Nielsen data “is across-the-counter ‘sales’ data,”
tracking the number of cigars sold at the point of sale, while
under FETRA “[m]arket shares . . . are computed based on
tobacco product ‘removal’ data.” Letter Decision at 6; see 7
U.S.C. § 518d(a)(3),(g)(2),(a)(2). Because FETRA adopted the
definition of “removal” in 26 U.S.C. § 5702, supra note 2, the
Secretary concluded USDA had to rely on excise tax and
customs forms that report data on “removal.” By contrast,
becauseA.C.Nielsen’sover-the-counter sales data does not track
“removal,” it “[is] not (and will not be) synonymous” with
“removal” data. Letter Decision at 6. USDA was not required
to provide more of an explanation for rejecting Prime Time’s
suggestion it use A.C. Nielsen data instead of “removal” data.
See Tourus Records, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement Admin., 259 F.3d
731, 737 (D.C. Cir. 2001). Still, the discrepancy is troubling and
inasmuch as the Secretary’s explanation was based on his view
that section 518d(g)(3)(A) was dispositive, we leave open the
question whether, upon remand, A.C. Nielsen data may assume
significance should Prime Time renew its argument.
We do not address Prime Time’s contention that its due
process rights were violated when USDA refused to disclose the
tax and customs data underlying its FETRA assessments. On
appeal USDA advises that, with Treasury Department
agreement, certain previously unavailable industry-wide data
sought by Prime Time can now be disclosed without running
afoul of the tax confidentiality statute, 26 U.S.C. § 6103. See
Appellees’ Br. 34; 7 C.F.R. § 1463.8(b)(8). Any due process
challenge would therefore arise in a different context upon
remand.
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 11 of 16
12. 12
4
The USDA’s IQA guidelines are available at
www.ocio.usda.gov/qi_guide/.
5
Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality,
Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by
III.
The Information Quality Act of 2000 provides that the
Director of the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”)
shall, “with public and Federal agency involvement,” issue
guidelines by the end of September 2001 that:
provide policy and procedural guidance to Federal
agencies for ensuring and maximizing the quality,
objectivity, utility, and integrity of information
(including statistical information) disseminated by
Federal agencies in fulfillment of the purposes and
provisions of chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code,
commonly referred to as the Paperwork Reduction Act.
44 U.S.C. § 3516 note (a). The guidelines “apply to the sharing
by Federal agencies of, and access to, information disseminated
by Federal agencies,” and require such agencies to “issue
guidelines ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity,
utility, and integrity of information . . . disseminated by the
agency.” Id. § 3516 note (b)(1), (2)(A). Each such Federal
agency shall, under the guidelines, “establish administrative
mechanisms allowing affected persons to seek and obtain
correction of information maintained and disseminated by the
agency that does not comply with the guidelines issued under”
the IQA. Id. § 3516 note (b)(2)(B).4
The OMB Guidelines define “dissemination” as “agency
initiated or sponsored distribution of information to the public.”5
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 12 of 16
13. 13
Federal Agencies; Republication, 67 Fed. Reg. 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002)
(“OMB Guidelines”).
6
Prime Time also submitted, pursuant to the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, a request for the data underlying its
assessments, which USDA denied and Prime Time did not appeal.
67 Fed. Reg. at 8460. The definition excludes “distribution
limited to . . . adjudicative processes.” Id. On appeal, USDA
points to the preamble to OMB’s Guidelines:
The exemption from the definition of “dissemination”
for “adjudicative processes” is intended to exclude,
from the scope of these guidelines, the findings and
determinations that an agency makes in the course of
adjudications involving specific parties. There are
well-established procedural safeguards and rights to
address the quality of adjudicatory decisions and to
provide persons with an opportunity to contest
decisions. These guidelines do not impose any
additionalrequirementsonagenciesduringadjudicative
proceedings and do not provide parties to such
adjudicative proceedings any additional rights of
challenge or appeal.
67 Fed. Reg. at 8454. USDA’s guidelines, in turn, exclude
“documents prepared and released in the context of adjudicative
processes.” USDA Information Quality Guidelines, Definitions,
§ 2, supra note 4.
Prime Time sought disclosure and correction under the IQA
of the data that USDA used to calculate its FETRA assessments,
USDA never responded, and Prime Time challenges that non-
response.6
USDA maintains that the IQA does not mandate the
issuance of information but merely instructs OMB to “provide
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 13 of 16
14. 14
policy and procedural guidance” for ensuring quality, utility,
and integrity of information. 44 U.S.C. § 3516 note (a). Prime
Time relies, however, on the provision that requires agencies to
“establish administrative mechanisms allowing affected persons
to seek and obtain correction of information maintained and
disseminated by the agency.” Id. § (b)(2)(B). Regardless,
because Congress delegated to OMB authority to develop
binding guidelines implementing the IQA, we defer to OMB’s
reasonable construction of the statute. See United States v.
Mead, 533 U.S. 218, 226–27 (2001). The IQA is silent on the
meaning of “dissemination,” and in defining the term OMB
exercised its discretion to exclude documents prepared and
distributed in the context of adjudicative proceedings. This is a
permissible interpretation of the statute, see Chevron, 467 U.S.
at 843, and Prime Time does not contend otherwise. Rather,
Prime Time attempts to avoid the consequences of the IQA
exemption for adjudications on the ground it is waived because
USDA did not raise it in the district court.
This court has repeatedly recognized that issues and legal
theories not asserted in the district court “ordinarily will not be
heard on appeal.” See, e.g., Horowitz v. Peace Corps, 428 F.3d
271, 282 (D.C. Cir. 2005); Hall v. Ford, 856 F.2d 255, 267 (D.C.
Cir. 1988); District of Columbia v. Air Florida, Inc., 750 F.2d
1077, 1084 (D.C. Cir. 1984) . The reasons for this rule are clear:
[O]ur procedural scheme contemplates that parties shall
come to issue in the trial forum vested with authority to
determine questions of fact. This is essential in order
that parties may have the opportunity to offer all the
evidence they believe relevant to the issues which the
trial tribunal is alone competent to decide; it is equally
essential in order that litigants may not be surprised on
appeal by final decision there of issues upon which they
have had no opportunity to introduce evidence.
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 14 of 16
15. 15
Hormel v. Helvering, 312 U.S. 552, 556 (1941).
USDA did not raise the “exemption for adjudications”
argument in the district court, so normally it would be forfeited.
See generally United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 733 (1993).
However, in Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 121 (1976), the
Supreme Court observed:
The matter of what questions may be taken up and
resolved for the first time on appeal is one left primarily
to the discretion of the courts of appeals, to be
exercised on the facts of individual cases. We
announce no general rule. Certainly there are
circumstances in which a federal appellate court is
justified in resolving an issue not passed on below, as
where the proper resolution is beyond any doubt, see
Turner v. City of Memphis, 369 U.S. 350 (1962).
The “proper resolution [of the IQA issue] is beyond any doubt,”
so this court is free to reach it. The issue involves a
straightforward legal question, and both parties have fully
addressed the issue on appeal. Consequently, no “injustice” will
be done if we decide the issue. Id. USDA’s determination of
Prime Time’s assessments for three quarters of FY 2005 was an
adjudication, attendant to which Prime Time had rights to an
administrative appeal and judicial review. See 5 U.S.C. § 551(7)
(defining “adjudication”); 7 U.S.C. § 518d(i), (j). Prime Time’s
contention that USDA violated the IQA when it did not respond
to a request to disclose and correct certain information
underlying the tobacco assessments thus fails.
Accordingly, we reverse the grant of summary judgment to
USDA on Prime Time’s FETRA claims, we do not reach its due
process claims in view of USDA’s representation about
requested data that will become available to Prime Time upon
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 15 of 16
16. 16
remand, and we affirm the dismissal of the IQA challenge,
although on a different ground than relied upon by the district
court.
USCA Case #09-5099 Document #1236845 Filed: 03/26/2010 Page 16 of 16