This document discusses whether secular societies can manifest a "pneumatological consensus" or cooperation with the Holy Spirit. It suggests we can observe how well a pluralistic society's culture, history, society, economy, and politics 1) sanctify, 2) orient, 3) empower, 4) heal, and 5) save its people. However, any realization of the Kingdom's values in society are still unfolding and imperfect. It also cautions against too sharp a distinction between the eschatological and temporal significance of Gospel imperatives in politics and other realms.
divine omnipotence, divine omniscience, divine omnibenevolence, divine attributes, divine omnipathy, polydoxy, theodicy, problem of evil, miracles, soft power, weak power, the hobbit, the annunciation, the incarnation, ivan karamazov and the grand inquisitor, mary's fiat, the passion of jesus, axis of...
Also found in:miracles, theodicy, the hobbit, divine attributes, the incarnation, the annunciation, polydoxy, soft power, problem of evil, marys fiat, axis of codependency, axis of cocreativity, divine omnipathy, divine omnipotence, divine omniscience, weak power, apathetic indifference, divine omnibenevolence, ivan karamazov and the grand inquisitor, the passion of jesus
metaphysics, natural theology, philosophical theology, theology of nature, john haught, joseph bracken, philip clayton, david ray griffin, a.n. whitehead, charles sanders peirce, charles hartshorne, john milbank, catherine keller, thomas oord, monica coleman, tripp fuller, panentheism, john caputo, process theology, evolutionary epistemology, fallibilism, john sobert sylvest, malunkyaputta, nominalism, essentialism, univocity of being, analogy of being, god concept, epistemic indeterminacy, ontological undecidability, entropic erasure, problem of induction, godel's incompleteness theorems, infinite semiosis, self authenticity, self transcendence, self actualization, soteriological trajectory, sophiological trajectory, polydoxy, radical orthodoxy, radical hermeneutics, homebrewed christianity
aurobindo, tony jones, crystal downing, charles sanders peirce, amos yong, john sobert sylvest, leonard sweet, brian mclaren, panentheism, panen-theism, pan-entheism, triadic sign, semiotic science, pansemioentheism, pan-semio-entheism, polydoxy, theology of nature
dorothy day, anarchist, pacifist, anarchism, pacifism, distributism, communitarian, corporal works of mercy, spiritual works of mercy, coercive government, anti-statist, preferential option for the poor, preferential option for the marginalized
1. A Pneumatological Consensus?
by John N Veronica on Saturday, 28 May 2011 at 12:26
In a pluralistic country, might we perhaps discern how much,
on the whole, its people cooperate with the Spirit?
Might we observe how well its:
1) culture sanctifies
2) history orients
3) society empowers
4) economy heals &
5) politics save ----------- its people?
Might the secular there manifest, for better or worse, a
"pneumatological consensus" with its implicit theology,
eschatology, ecclesiology, sacramentology & soteriology?
Of course, we are talking about proleptic (anticipatory)
realizations of Kingdom values that are yet unfolding toward a
future fullness.
This would clearly differ from any overly dialectical
perspective that would essentially run counter to a robustly
incarnational and profusely pneumatological approach to all of
reality, even while recognizing significant differences in any
degree of cooperation with the Spirit. Of course, failures to
cooperate might result from either inabilities (due to poor
formation or even deformative influences) or refusals (known
to God alone).
Also, this might differ, somewhat, from any Niebuhrian realism
that would draw too sharp a distinction between the
1
2. eschatological and temporal significance of Gospel
imperatives? For example, nonviolence then but not now?
Or from any exegetical interpretations that would too sharply
distinguish between our personal vocations and political
statecraft? For example, coercion there but not here? Or that
would suggest so-called dispensational distinctions? For
example, signs & wonders then but not now, there but not
here)?
And we might introduce a distinction between the Gospel's
robustly unitive norms (how to live in loving intimacy with
God and others) and general revelation's merely moral norms
(how to live in harmony with God, others, creation & self,
pursuing what's good and right, avoiding what's evil and
wrong), morality realized as a by-product of the former, an
end-product of the latter, necessary in any case. Because of
our radical human finitude and sinfulness (personal, social &
institutional), any sanctioned departures from these unitive
norms would represent, then, no theoretical theological
capitulations (eisegesis even) but, rather, practical pastoral
accommodations (for example, regarding any use of coercive
violence). At any rate, these unitive norms - and not any
essentially moral norms, which are otherwise transparent to
human reason without the benefit of special revelation(s) differentiate the Gospel brand in the marketplace. Love is a
suitable means to the ends of justice but its unitive aims
clearly exceed those, even breaking open a new category.
2