PLDT’s P48 Billion
Over budget
Group 4
FREDDY C. NAVARRO, CMITAP, MBA
Presenter
RATIONALE
PLDT, a leading telecommunications company in
the Philippines, experienced a significant budget
overrun of P48 billion. The overrun occurred due to a
combination of factors, including mismanagement,
unexpected expenses, and economic challenges in the
telecommunications industry.
Q1: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND
CAPITAL MARKET ISSUES:
1. Transparency and Accountability:
PLDT's failure to promptly disclose the budget
overrun raises concerns about transparency and
accountability in corporate governance. Shareholders
and investors expect accurate and timely financial
reporting, but the delay in disclosure may erode trust in
the company's leadership.
2. Regulatory Compliance:
Regulatory authorities may question whether
PLDT complied with financial regulations and
standards in managing its finances and reporting
financial information to stakeholders. Failure to adhere
to regulatory requirements could result in legal and
financial repercussions for the company.
Q2: HANDLING OF ISSUES:
PLDT Management: Initially, PLDT management struggled to
effectively communicate the reasons behind the budget overrun
and provide a comprehensive plan to address the issue. This lack of
transparency may have contributed to uncertainty among
shareholders and investors.
Regulatory Authorities: Regulatory bodies launched
investigations into PLDT's financial management practices and
compliance with regulatory requirements. They sought to ensure
that the company adhered to industry standards and took
appropriate measures to rectify the situation.
Q3: RESOLUTION APPROACH:
1. Enhanced Financial Controls:
PLDT should implement stricter financial controls
and oversight mechanisms to prevent future budget
overruns. This includes enhancing budgeting processes,
conducting regular audits, and implementing risk
management strategies to mitigate financial risks.
2. Improved Communication:
PLDT should prioritize transparent
communication with shareholders and investors,
providing timely updates on financial performance and
addressing concerns promptly. Open communication
channels will help rebuild trust and confidence in the
company.
3. Strengthened Regulatory Oversight:
Regulatory authorities should continue to monitor
PLDT's compliance with financial regulations and
standards, conducting thorough audits and inspections
to ensure accountability. They should also impose
sanctions or penalties for any violations to deter
misconduct.
4. Board Oversights:
PLDT's board of directors should play a more
active role in overseeing financial management
practices and holding management accountable for
governance lapses. Board oversight is crucial in
ensuring that the company operates with integrity and
transparency.
CONCLUSION:
The PLDT P48 Billion Budget Overrun highlights the
importance of good governance and regulatory compliance in
corporate finance. By addressing issues related to transparency,
accountability, and regulatory oversight, PLDT can rebuild
trust with stakeholders and strengthen its position in the
telecommunications industry. However, achieving lasting
change will require concerted efforts from PLDT management,
regulatory authorities, and the board of directors to implement
effective governance reforms and prevent similar incidents in
the future.
Thank you!

PLDT's P48Billion Over Budget a Case Study

  • 1.
    PLDT’s P48 Billion Overbudget Group 4 FREDDY C. NAVARRO, CMITAP, MBA Presenter
  • 3.
    RATIONALE PLDT, a leadingtelecommunications company in the Philippines, experienced a significant budget overrun of P48 billion. The overrun occurred due to a combination of factors, including mismanagement, unexpected expenses, and economic challenges in the telecommunications industry.
  • 4.
    Q1: GOOD GOVERNANCEAND CAPITAL MARKET ISSUES: 1. Transparency and Accountability: PLDT's failure to promptly disclose the budget overrun raises concerns about transparency and accountability in corporate governance. Shareholders and investors expect accurate and timely financial reporting, but the delay in disclosure may erode trust in the company's leadership.
  • 5.
    2. Regulatory Compliance: Regulatoryauthorities may question whether PLDT complied with financial regulations and standards in managing its finances and reporting financial information to stakeholders. Failure to adhere to regulatory requirements could result in legal and financial repercussions for the company.
  • 6.
    Q2: HANDLING OFISSUES: PLDT Management: Initially, PLDT management struggled to effectively communicate the reasons behind the budget overrun and provide a comprehensive plan to address the issue. This lack of transparency may have contributed to uncertainty among shareholders and investors. Regulatory Authorities: Regulatory bodies launched investigations into PLDT's financial management practices and compliance with regulatory requirements. They sought to ensure that the company adhered to industry standards and took appropriate measures to rectify the situation.
  • 7.
    Q3: RESOLUTION APPROACH: 1.Enhanced Financial Controls: PLDT should implement stricter financial controls and oversight mechanisms to prevent future budget overruns. This includes enhancing budgeting processes, conducting regular audits, and implementing risk management strategies to mitigate financial risks.
  • 8.
    2. Improved Communication: PLDTshould prioritize transparent communication with shareholders and investors, providing timely updates on financial performance and addressing concerns promptly. Open communication channels will help rebuild trust and confidence in the company.
  • 9.
    3. Strengthened RegulatoryOversight: Regulatory authorities should continue to monitor PLDT's compliance with financial regulations and standards, conducting thorough audits and inspections to ensure accountability. They should also impose sanctions or penalties for any violations to deter misconduct.
  • 10.
    4. Board Oversights: PLDT'sboard of directors should play a more active role in overseeing financial management practices and holding management accountable for governance lapses. Board oversight is crucial in ensuring that the company operates with integrity and transparency.
  • 11.
    CONCLUSION: The PLDT P48Billion Budget Overrun highlights the importance of good governance and regulatory compliance in corporate finance. By addressing issues related to transparency, accountability, and regulatory oversight, PLDT can rebuild trust with stakeholders and strengthen its position in the telecommunications industry. However, achieving lasting change will require concerted efforts from PLDT management, regulatory authorities, and the board of directors to implement effective governance reforms and prevent similar incidents in the future.
  • 13.