The workshop highlighted how documentary photographers in India and China have depicted the lives of industrial laborers and the complex relationship between laborers, factories, and the media. Scholars from various universities presented on photographers who explored themes like man-machine relations, shifting labor relations during industrialization, and competing narratives around automation and worker complementarity with machines. Their photos revealed both critiques of labor exploitation and narratives of industrial progress. The discussion provided insights into how photography captured the interplay between traditional values and the costs of modernizing nations.

1. Subscribe Advertise Join Donate    
About
Published by the Students of Johns Hopkins since 1896
February 27, 2021
Photography workshop highlights relations
between laborers, factories and media
By JAE CHOI and DYLAN KWANG | February 26, 2021  
EDWARD BURTYNSKY/CC BY 2.0
Burtynsky’s photographs highlight the e ect of industry on nature, one of the themes of the show.
The History of Art and East Asian Studies departments sponsored an event titled “Documenting Industry: Photography,
Modernity and the Nation in India and China” on Feb. 19. Scholars from around the world joined the Zoom-recorded event,
presenting original research on ways in which documentary photographers have explored the lives of industrial laborers in
India and China.
Rebecca M. Brown, professor and chair of the Department of the History of Art, welcomed attendees and o ered a brief
introduction to the topics at hand.
“Documentary photography has never been simple or straight, and [it] has always been bound up with and actively
participating in the relation among laboring bodies, factories, infrastructural projects and the media that disseminates and
frames these images and the politics embedded in all of these things,” she said.

2. What followed was a fascinating series of presentations from professors at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Guwahati,
Hopkins and the University of Maryland.
Ranu Roychoudhuri from IIT Guwahati presented rst. She discussed how photography had the function of not only
documenting history but also capturing sophisticated man-machine relations. Her presentation, titled “Framing Industrial-
scape in Post-Independence India,” began with quotes from India’s rst prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Sunil Janah,
who worked as a photojournalist and documentary photographer in India during the mid-20th century.
This quote from Janah captured the crux of her presentation:
“The most striking aspects of these photographs were, to me, the very modern industrial structures being built manually by
primitive villagers and tribals carrying cement mixtures in pails on their head at the worksites, where giant steel piles were
being driven into the ground by even bigger machines, and monstrous earth-moving machines were roaring around.”
Roychoudhuri then launched into a discussion of the works of Janah, Amil Dali and Werner Bischof.
I was struck by how many of these industrial photographs paradoxically seemed to humanize machines, making them appear
as extensions of human labor rather than as capital goods divorced from human aspirations. Many of these photographs
were beautiful; perhaps it was the way in which the pictures were composed or the way they juxtaposed human limbs and
faces with the mechanical appendages of factory equipment.
Indeed, one of Roychoudhuri’s hypotheses concerning the photographs was that they “ ipped” the idea of what it means to
humanize and aestheticize machines.
Roychoudhuri brought forward several other hypotheses: that these photographs depicted and critiqued their subjects, that
they had the e ect of helping people visually apprehend the Anthropocene (for instance, by foregrounding heavy pollution)
and that they invited viewers to rethink what it means to see the beauty in industrial environments that they would not
usually associate with beauty.
The next presentation was from Gaochao He of the East Asian Studies department, titled “The Engaged Lens: Documentary
Photography and the Industrial Workplace in China.” His remarks were broad-reaching and fascinating.
Pursuing a more historical line of inquiry, He discussed how documentary photography in China tracked shifting labor
relations during China’s industrialization. The subjects of his chosen photographs were wide-ranging: pictures of Chairman
Mao inspecting a factory-produced car, soot-covered workers repairing blast furnaces and socialist realist portraits of “labor
heroes” meant to galvanize the labor force.
“Putting everything together, [these images] represent the imagination of the beauty of industry and the power of the steel
mill and this new generation of workers [in the 1950s],” he said.
Some of his photographs also featured scenes of demoralization and suspicion of industry. My personal favorite was an
image of workers at an electronics factory reclining on their seats in exhaustion; no human faces are clearly visible except for
that of one young woman who stares blankly into the camera lens. Her expression is unreadable, but somehow the body
language of her colleagues o ers insight into what she might be feeling.
We returned to India with Mircea Raianu’s presentation, titled “Industrial Photography, National Capitalism and the Laboring
Body in 1950s India.” Like Roychoudhuri, Raianu, who is a professor at the University of Maryland, was interested in the works
of Janah and Bischof, as well as the relation between the human body and the machine. His presentation was particularly
focused on images of miners and private factory advertisements.
What was most interesting about Raianu’s presentation was that his chosen photographs seemed to advance competing
narratives. On the one hand, he noted that some pictures seemed to subscribe to a “declinist automation narrative,” which
critiqued labor exploitation and the replacement of workers by machines, while others subscribed to a “progressive skilling
narrative,” which stressed how workers and machines could complement each other. Raianu argued that the second narrative
may have functioned as a convenient public relations gambit. Speaking of one image of women carrying rocks on their heads
through a quarry, he noted that this gambit would have hidden some of the material realities of workers.
“I don’t think anyone can look at these photos and say a new India is being born,” he said.
That said, Raianu stressed that the distinction between these narratives was rarely clear-cut, especially under the
progression of neoliberalism.

3. Stuart Leslie from the Department of the History of Science and Technology was the concluding speaker before the Q&A
session. His presentation compared the viewpoints of various artists in framing the industrial landscape. He spoke about the
e ect of Henry Ford’s factory in Detroit as a lodestar to India’s industries and the various problems associated with capturing
a “manufactured landscape.”
Juxtaposing Charles Sheeler’s images of Ford’s Detroit factory with Diego Rivera’s murals, Leslie described Sheeler’s
photographs as “menacing” due to the lack of human presence, likening the factory to a “cathedral of the machine age.” In
comparison, Diego Rivera depicted the labor theory of value in his murals by painting workers toiling together in the factory.
Leslie explained that images that glori ed industrialization often failed to show the people and communities that were
displaced as a result.
Next, Leslie compared two artists, W. Eugene Smith and Charles Harris, in their depictions of Pittsburgh. While Smith showed
the active workers as heroic, he also displayed their personal lifestyles within the city. Harris, a Black photographer, turned
his lens to Black communities within Pittsburgh, including an early civil rights protest.
Leslie closed his presentation by showing the work of Edward Burtynsky and the aestheticism of manufactured landscapes.
Burtynsky’s work has often been criticized due to its large size formats, which while visually striking, can be seen as uncritical
of true working conditions. Leslie rounded out his talk with a question.
“How do documentary photographers capture the nancial landscape that makes the manufactured landscape possible?” he
said.
The panel then proceeded to a Q&A format. When pressed further on India’s burgeoning post-colonial industrialism under
the pretense of nation-building, Raianu made an analogy to the pyramids.
“The pyramids are a good parallel to think about this,” he said. “We have the idea of people carrying rocks. This is the
common thread of representation that takes us through the di erent photos from 1950 to 2012 photos. These photos have
associative evocations of ancient ruins.”
Through the lens of documentary photographers, one can easily nd traces of Western in uences on the emerging
industrialization in both India and China. While exploring di erent narratives and in uences from various politics, this
presentation demonstrated ways in which photography can capture the complex interplay between traditional cultural
values and the cost of modernizing a nation.
Tags: arts
Related Articles
New Net ix docuseries questions the
meaning of a crime
By ANDREW SHIBUYA | 16 hours ago
Shriver Hall Concert Series hosts
Daniil Trifonov's virtual concert
By SARAH JUNG | 16 hours ago
Judas and the Black Messiah
spotlights the story of Fred
Hampton’s assassination
By RISHABH KUMAR | 2 days ago

4. Please note All comments are eligible for publication in The News-Letter.
0 Comments The Johns Hopkins News-Letter 🔒 Disqus' Privacy Policy Login

1
t Tweet f Share Sort by Best
LOG IN WITH OR SIGN UP WITH DISQUS
Name
Start the discussion…
?
Be the first to comment.
Subscribe
✉ Add Disqus to your siteAdd DisqusAdd
d Do Not Sell My Data
⚠
Recommend

EDITOR'S PICKS
NEWS-LETTER SPECIAL EDITIONS
Hopkins pharmacologist calls for diversifying clinical trials
Legislators are voting on the private police. Students must show they care.
Judas and the Black Messiah spotlights the story of Fred Hampton’s assassination
Men's lacrosse falls short in season opener against Ohio State
Stigma is rife in the treatment of mental illness in the Black community
Women’s lacrosse drops opener against Rutgers

5. Embed View on Twitter
Tweets by @JHUNewsLetter
SPORTPINION: With the elimination of the home game advantage, Marina Ayuso shares her run-down of the stakes and contenders left in each of the matchups in the 2021
UEFA Champions League. jhunewsletter.com/article/2021/0…
JHU News-Letter
@JHUNewsLetter
NEWS
OPINION
VOICES
ARTS

 
 



SCITECH
SPORTS
YOUR WEEKEND
MULTIMEDIA
MAGAZINE
ARCHIVES
All Rights Reserved
© Copyright 2019 The Johns Hopkins News-
Letter
Powered by Solutions by The State
News
Published by the Students of Johns Hopkins since 1896