Phone tapped

•

0 likes•212 views

Deborah Swan

More from Deborah Swan

Court orders of public paying for transcripts

Deborah Swan

This is the actual court transcript of Charles Dyer's 2nd trial. This is the conversation that took place within the judges chambers before the trials started. This conversation is between Judge Enos, the District Attorney Carrie Hicks, and Charles criminal defense attorney Albert Hoch. You will learn how Judge Enos withheld Charles witnesses and evidence that should be allowed into the trial. The main responsibility of a Judge during a "trial by jury" is to make sure ALL witnesses and evidence is presented during the trial by both sides. This is critical to protect the accused rights of his due process. When a judge holds back evidence or witnesses from being presented during a trial, this is a direct violation of due process and should be brought up in the appeal if the accused is convicted. This only purpose of an appeal is to correct any violations that occurred during the trial. This is how an innocent person wins on his appeal, is to show the appeal judges how the trial judge did not follow his rules of his court. The appeal judges are required by law to correct the errors of the judge (court). This is how convictions are reversed. When you review Charles Dyer's appeal he has turned in, he has not put any of his propositions against the Judge (court) This is why Charles Dyer's appeal has been denied. This is the critical information Deborah Swan was trying to share with Charles during the time he was preparing his appeal. Charles Dyer did not listen to the information and drafted his entire appeal around his attorney for "ineffective assistance off council" and "prosecutorial misconduct." These are issues that should be handled during the actual trial and pre trial, when the prosecutor violates and does not follow his rules of his position. This is critical for the appeal process. The ONLY issues that are allowed to be ruled (corrected) by the appeal judges, are the issues that were put on "record" during trial and pre trials.If there is not any actual record made pre trial and during the actual trial, then you cannot bring it in on an appeal. The appeal judges are not allowed to correct any proposition in an appeal, unless there is an actual record that was preserved. This is why is critical for an attorney to OBJECT to all violations that occur during the trial. This is how you preserve and create a record to use if the innocent is convicted. This is why Charles Dyer's attorney Albert Hoch made ZERO objections during his trial. If Albert Hoch would of objected to the violations that were happening during the trial, then Charles appeal he turned in would of been accepted.

CHARLES DYER'S TRANSCRIPT OF HIS 2ND TRIAL HELD OF JANUARY 23, 2012.

Deborah Swan

20121001160133408

Deborah Swan

20120920154354218

Deborah Swan

This is a list of what I sent to Ed Snook when he was hired to get Charles Dyer false charges to be dropped. Ed Snook has been trying to say that he was hired to prove Charles was innocent. We already know he is innocent. Ed Snook was hired to do what his web site claims he has done over 4200 people who were wrongfully convicted... Snook was hired too put pressure on the Judge and the Prosecutor or he would expose these public officials for all they have done to convict a innocent man! charges get dropped. Ed Snook first told me my evidence was good! Then 2 weeks later he drops me and acts like all my evidence was lunacy.

List of Evidence given to Ed Snook when Deborah Swan first hired him.

Deborah Swan

Ed Snook with the US Observer has threatened to put Deborah Swan in prison because Deborah filed a consumer complaint against when Ed Snook after he dropped her from the contract she signed with him. the ocClay Douglas who is the owner of Revolution Radio had Ed Snook as his guest. Ed Snook is owner of the US Observer. This 2 hour show was all about Deborah Swan. Ed Snook has committed a serious crime of , Extortion. defamation, fraud, and malicious persacution without any concerns of what the laws say! Ed Snook has been accusing Swan of crimes she has never committed. Snook slanders Deborah Swan the entire 2 hours. Edward Snook also actually admits he is working to get "Deborah Swan put in prison because she is a dangerous lunatic."

Ed Snook with the US Observer threatens to put a Deborah Swan in prison becau...

Deborah Swan

This is a demand letter has been sent today, to the mother of Charles Dyer aka July 4 Patriot. I, Deborah Swan must now take this type of action . Janet Dyer is using me as her scapegoat and is helping Ed Snook, who owns the U S Observer, to destroy my name and my reputation. I was not aware of these actions that have been played against me , until about 2 months ago This has become critical and I must take the appropriate measures to clear my name. This is my first demand to stop with this slander of my name and reputation.I am being accused of crimes I have never done. I deserve a right to be shown the evidence of what all this group and Janet Dyer has blamed me of doing against Charles. Malicious slander of someone is one of the worst sins according to God. Slander is the acts of Satan and his children.

Jan Dyer's (mother of Charles Dyer) Demand Letter to stop defaming Deborah ...

Deborah Swan

Ed Snook, the owner o the US Observer, has committed libel and slander against Deborah Swan. They have used her as the scapegoat, while using extortion, threats, and public humiliation as a way to silence Deborah and destroy any credibility. Why would they do this? Because Ed Snook has ignored what evidence Deborah collected and hired the Us Observer to help expose. Deborah has the proof of the corruption that has taken place against Charles Dyer aka July 4 Patriot. Ed Snook has claimed Deborah paranoid and a lunatic. This is the actions of Satin himself.

ED SNOOK WHO OWN US OBSERVER HAS SPREADS LIES AND SLANDER

Deborah Swan

More from Deborah Swan (8)

Court orders of public paying for transcripts

CHARLES DYER'S TRANSCRIPT OF HIS 2ND TRIAL HELD OF JANUARY 23, 2012.

20121001160133408

20120920154354218

List of Evidence given to Ed Snook when Deborah Swan first hired him.

Ed Snook with the US Observer threatens to put a Deborah Swan in prison becau...

Jan Dyer's (mother of Charles Dyer) Demand Letter to stop defaming Deborah ...

ED SNOOK WHO OWN US OBSERVER HAS SPREADS LIES AND SLANDER

Phone tapped

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Deborah Swan

More from Deborah Swan (8)