Plato (427-347 BCE) was an ancient Greek philosopher who founded the Academy in Athens, one of the earliest known institutions of higher learning in the Western world. He is best known for his dialogues and for founding the Academy, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. In his Allegory of the Cave, Plato describes a group of people chained in a cave seeing only shadows on the wall from puppets manipulated by people behind them, mistaking the shadows for reality, analogous to ignorant people who do not see true forms or ideas. Plato believed that only philosophers could break free of ignorance and grasp true forms and reality.
Darwin didn’t know what we know in science today. He didn’t know science on a cellular level, … biochemistry & electron microscopes weren’t available to him.
For example, in Darwin’s day, people referred to the amazing cell as a “simple” cell, and thought cells were just blobs of jelly-like material. People also still believed in spontaneous generation; that means that they believed that decaying meat generated maggots and that stale bread generated mold…….
In fact, spontaneous generation is the basis for the evolutionary theory that life erupted from a pre-historic chemical soup. So, just as we know today that meat does not produce maggots and bread doesn’t produce mold, we have a better understanding of the truly miraculous single cell. True science has proven that spontaneous generation is impossible. ....
Darwin didn’t know what we know in science today. He didn’t know science on a cellular level, … biochemistry & electron microscopes weren’t available to him.
For example, in Darwin’s day, people referred to the amazing cell as a “simple” cell, and thought cells were just blobs of jelly-like material. People also still believed in spontaneous generation; that means that they believed that decaying meat generated maggots and that stale bread generated mold…….
In fact, spontaneous generation is the basis for the evolutionary theory that life erupted from a pre-historic chemical soup. So, just as we know today that meat does not produce maggots and bread doesn’t produce mold, we have a better understanding of the truly miraculous single cell. True science has proven that spontaneous generation is impossible. ....
353Socrates, PlatoThus the soul, since it is immorta.docxgilbertkpeters11344
35
3
Socrates, Plato
Thus the soul, since it is immortal and has been born many times, and has
seen all things both here and in the other world, has learned everything
that is. —Plato, Meno
Love [is] between the mortal and the immortal. . . . [It is] a grand spirit which
brings together the sensible world and the eternal world and merges them
into one great whole. —Diotima in Plato’s Symposium, 202e
I [Socrates] affirm that the good is the beautiful. —Plato’s Lysis, 216d
f you have heard of only one philosopher, it is probably one of the big three:
Socrates, Plato, or Aristotle.These three were the most important philosophers
of ancient Greece and in some respects the most important, period. Plato was the
pupil of Socrates, and Aristotle was the pupil of Plato.This chapter covers Socrates
and Plato; the following chapter, Aristotle.
SOCRATES
In the fifth century B.C.E., the center of Western civilization was Athens, a city-state
and a democracy. This period of time was some three centuries after the first
Olympic Games and the start of alphabetic writing, and approximately one cen-
tury before Alexander the Great demonstrated that it is possible to conquer the
world or what passed for it then. Fifty thousand citizens of Athens governed the
city and the city’s empire. Athenians did not settle disputes by brawling but rather
I
36 Part One • Metaphysics and Epistemology: Existence and Knowledge
by discussion and debate. Power was not achieved through wealth or physical
strength or skill with weapons; it was achieved through words. Rhetoricians, men
and women with sublime skill in debate, created plausible arguments for almost
any assertion and, for a fee, taught others to do it too.
These rhetoricians, the Western world’s first professors, were the Sophists.
They were interested in practical things, and few had patience with metaphysical
speculation. They demonstrated their rhetorical abilities by “proving” the seem-
ingly unprovable—that is, by attacking commonly held views.The net effect was
an examination and a critique of accepted standards of behavior within Athenian
society. In this way, moral philosophy began. We will return to this topic in
Chapter 10.
At the same time in the fifth century B.C.E., there also lived a stonemason with
a muscular build and a keen mind, Socrates [SOK-ruh-teez] (470–399 B.C.E.).
He wrote nothing, but we know quite a bit about him from Plato’s famous dia-
logues, in which Socrates almost always stars. (Plato’s later dialogues reflect
Plato’s own views, even though “Socrates” is doing the speaking in them. But we
are able to extract a reasonably detailed picture of Socrates from the earlier
dialogues.)
Given the spirit of the times, it is not surprising that Socrates shared some of
the philosophical interests and practices of the Sophists. We must imagine him
wandering about the city, engaging citizens in discussion and argument. He was a
brilliant debater, and he was idolized by many youn.
3 53Socrates, PlatoThus the soul, since it is immort.docxgilbertkpeters11344
3 5
3
Socrates, Plato
Thus the soul, since it is immortal and has been born many times, and has
seen all things both here and in the other world, has learned everything
that is. — Plato, Meno
Love [is] between the mortal and the immortal. . . . [It is] a grand spirit which
brings together the sensible world and the eternal world and merges them
into one great whole. — Diotima in Plato’s Symposium, 202e
I [Socrates] affirm that the good is the beautiful. — Plato’s Lysis, 216d
f you have heard of only one philosopher, it is probably one of the big three:
Socrates, Plato, or Aristotle. These three were the most important philosophers
of ancient Greece and in some respects the most important, period. Plato was the
pupil of Socrates, and Aristotle was the pupil of Plato.This chapter covers Socrates
and Plato; the following chapter, Aristotle.
SOCR ATES
In the fifth century B.C.E., the center of Western civilization was Athens, a city-state
and a democracy. This period of time was some three centuries after the first
Olympic Games and the start of alphabetic writing, and approximately one cen-
tury before Alexander the Great demonstrated that it is possible to conquer the
world or what passed for it then. Fifty thousand citizens of Athens governed the
city and the city’s empire. Athenians did not settle disputes by brawling but rather
I
3 6 Part One • Metaphysics and Epistemology: Existence and Knowledge
by discussion and debate. Power was not achieved through wealth or physical
strength or skill with weapons; it was achieved through words. Rhetoricians, men
and women with sublime skill in debate, created plausible arguments for almost
any assertion and, for a fee, taught others to do it too.
These rhetoricians, the Western world’s first professors, were the Sophists.
They were interested in practical things, and few had patience with metaphysical
speculation. They demonstrated their rhetorical abilities by “proving” the seem-
ingly unprovable — that is, by attacking commonly held views. The net effect was
an examination and a critique of accepted standards of behavior within Athenian
society. In this way, moral philosophy began. We will return to this topic in
Chapter 10.
At the same time in the fifth century B.C.E., there also lived a stonemason with
a muscular build and a keen mind, Socrates [SOK-ruh-teez] (470–399 B.C.E.).
He wrote nothing, but we know quite a bit about him from Plato’s famous dia-
logues, in which Socrates almost always stars. (Plato’s later dialogues reflect
Plato’s own views, even though “Socrates” is doing the speaking in them. But we
are able to extract a reasonably detailed picture of Socrates from the earlier
dialogues.)
Given the spirit of the times, it is not surprising that Socrates shared some of
the philosophical interests and practices of the Sophists. We must imagine him
wandering about the city, engaging citizens in discussion and argument. He was a
brilliant debater, and he was idolized by.
1.2 PLATO’S ALLEGORY OF THE CAVEWe can follow some of Socrates’ TatianaMajor22
1.2 PLATO’S ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE
We can follow some of Socrates’ themes by exploring the ideas of Plato (c. 428–348 B.C.), Socrates’ most famous disciple. (Further biographical information on Plato can be found in section 3.2.) If we are to search for wisdom and to know how to live our lives, Plato believed, we must have a correct understanding of knowledge and reality. Plato’s view of reality, as well as his view of knowledge and personal enlightenment, is represented in his famous Allegory of the Cave, which has become a classic story in Western literature. In this allegory, Plato suggests the possibility that reality may be entirely different than our taken-for-granted assumptions suppose it to be. In telling this story, Plato uses the figure of his teacher Socrates to present his ideas. As you read the allegory, answer the following questions.
Can you imagine the scene in the cave Socrates describes? Sketch a picture of all the elements in the cave.
Glaucon says the people in the story are “strange prisoners.” Socrates then gives the stunning reply that they are “like ourselves.” Why do you suppose Socrates compares us to these prisoners?
30
This diagram of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave represents chained prisoners whose only reality is the shadow world projected on the wall in front of them. They are unaware that behind them is the higher degree of reality of the fire and the statues that are casting the shadows. Still further up is the steep and rugged passage out of the cave to the upper world. A prisoner who follows this path will encounter the world of real objects and the sun. Plato used this story as a rough analogy to the modes of awareness and levels of reality discussed in his philosophy.
What do the shadows stand for?
What are the “shadows” in our society? In your life?
According to this story, what is enlightenment?
In what sense does the freed prisoner not understand the shadows as well as his friends do when he returns to the cave? In what sense does he understand the shadows better than his friends do?
In what ways are the events in the enlightened prisoner’s life like the events in the historical Socrates’ life?
Summarize what philosophical points you think Plato is making in this allegory.
31
FROM PLATO
Republic10
SOCRATES: And now, let me show in a parable how far our nature is enlightened or unenlightened. Imagine human beings living in an underground den, which has a mouth open towards the light. Here they have been from their childhood, and have their legs and necks chained so that they can not move, and can only see before them, being prevented by the chains from turning their heads around. Above and behind them a fire is blazing at a distance, and between the fire and the prisoners there is a raised walk; and you will see, if you look, a low wall built along the walkway, like the screen which marionette players have in front of them, over which they show the puppets.
GLAUCON: I see.
SOCRATES: And do yo ...
The Allegory of the CaveAt the beginning of Book VII of Plato’s .docxtodd801
The Allegory of the Cave
At the beginning of Book VII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates famously invokes an image of human nature with respect to education and the lack of it, likening our situation to that of prisoners in a cave. Imagine an underground cave-like dwelling, its entrance entirely out of sight. Inhabiting this cave are human beings whose feet and necks are chained so that they can neither get up nor turn their heads; they can only see straight ahead. Above and behind them burns a fire, and between them and the fire there is a raised path and a low wall, like the screen above which performers display their puppets. Behind this wall men pass to and fro carrying statues and figures of human beings, animals, and other objects in such a manner that the artifacts appear over the top of the screen, projecting onto the wall opposite the fire. The prisoners, unable to see neither the objects carried behind them nor one another, behold only the shadows of themselves and of the statues cast onto the wall in front of them.
The prisoners represent the vast majority of the human race: “they’re like us.” They live in a world in which images are mistaken for realities. What is a shadow, after all, but a mere image of something real (in this case a statue, which is itself an image of something even more real, namely a living human being or animal)? Moreover, the prisoners have not the faintest clue that throughout their entire lives they have been exposed to nothing but distortions of the truth—they are, in other words, unaware of their ignorance (just like Euthyphro, the fanatical young priest about whom you will read in the next chapter). The shadows represent the authoritative opinions that govern the hearts and minds of whole communities, and give a transcendent purpose and meaning to our particular existence.[1] These shadows are to be contrasted with the light of truth illuminating the world beyond the cave (but which also makes the shadows visible within it). The people carrying the statues are the lawgivers and poets who establish the cultural values and cosmic worldview that characterize and define a given society. In his excellent commentary on Plato’s Republic, Professor Allan Bloom explains: “We do not see men as they are but as they are represented to us by legislators and poets. A Greek sees things differently from the way a Persian sees them. One need only think of…the significance of cows to Hindus as opposed to other men to realize how powerful are the various horizons constituted by law or convention.”[2] These authoritative opinions are not accurate reflections of nature, but rather a curious amalgam of natureandconvention. To quote once again from Professor Bloom: “The first and most difficult of tasks is the separation of what exists by nature from what is merely made by man.”[3]
This, precisely, is the business of philosophy, which literally means “the love of wisdom,” coming from the ancient Greek words philein, meaning “to .
353Socrates, PlatoThus the soul, since it is immorta.docxgilbertkpeters11344
35
3
Socrates, Plato
Thus the soul, since it is immortal and has been born many times, and has
seen all things both here and in the other world, has learned everything
that is. —Plato, Meno
Love [is] between the mortal and the immortal. . . . [It is] a grand spirit which
brings together the sensible world and the eternal world and merges them
into one great whole. —Diotima in Plato’s Symposium, 202e
I [Socrates] affirm that the good is the beautiful. —Plato’s Lysis, 216d
f you have heard of only one philosopher, it is probably one of the big three:
Socrates, Plato, or Aristotle.These three were the most important philosophers
of ancient Greece and in some respects the most important, period. Plato was the
pupil of Socrates, and Aristotle was the pupil of Plato.This chapter covers Socrates
and Plato; the following chapter, Aristotle.
SOCRATES
In the fifth century B.C.E., the center of Western civilization was Athens, a city-state
and a democracy. This period of time was some three centuries after the first
Olympic Games and the start of alphabetic writing, and approximately one cen-
tury before Alexander the Great demonstrated that it is possible to conquer the
world or what passed for it then. Fifty thousand citizens of Athens governed the
city and the city’s empire. Athenians did not settle disputes by brawling but rather
I
36 Part One • Metaphysics and Epistemology: Existence and Knowledge
by discussion and debate. Power was not achieved through wealth or physical
strength or skill with weapons; it was achieved through words. Rhetoricians, men
and women with sublime skill in debate, created plausible arguments for almost
any assertion and, for a fee, taught others to do it too.
These rhetoricians, the Western world’s first professors, were the Sophists.
They were interested in practical things, and few had patience with metaphysical
speculation. They demonstrated their rhetorical abilities by “proving” the seem-
ingly unprovable—that is, by attacking commonly held views.The net effect was
an examination and a critique of accepted standards of behavior within Athenian
society. In this way, moral philosophy began. We will return to this topic in
Chapter 10.
At the same time in the fifth century B.C.E., there also lived a stonemason with
a muscular build and a keen mind, Socrates [SOK-ruh-teez] (470–399 B.C.E.).
He wrote nothing, but we know quite a bit about him from Plato’s famous dia-
logues, in which Socrates almost always stars. (Plato’s later dialogues reflect
Plato’s own views, even though “Socrates” is doing the speaking in them. But we
are able to extract a reasonably detailed picture of Socrates from the earlier
dialogues.)
Given the spirit of the times, it is not surprising that Socrates shared some of
the philosophical interests and practices of the Sophists. We must imagine him
wandering about the city, engaging citizens in discussion and argument. He was a
brilliant debater, and he was idolized by many youn.
3 53Socrates, PlatoThus the soul, since it is immort.docxgilbertkpeters11344
3 5
3
Socrates, Plato
Thus the soul, since it is immortal and has been born many times, and has
seen all things both here and in the other world, has learned everything
that is. — Plato, Meno
Love [is] between the mortal and the immortal. . . . [It is] a grand spirit which
brings together the sensible world and the eternal world and merges them
into one great whole. — Diotima in Plato’s Symposium, 202e
I [Socrates] affirm that the good is the beautiful. — Plato’s Lysis, 216d
f you have heard of only one philosopher, it is probably one of the big three:
Socrates, Plato, or Aristotle. These three were the most important philosophers
of ancient Greece and in some respects the most important, period. Plato was the
pupil of Socrates, and Aristotle was the pupil of Plato.This chapter covers Socrates
and Plato; the following chapter, Aristotle.
SOCR ATES
In the fifth century B.C.E., the center of Western civilization was Athens, a city-state
and a democracy. This period of time was some three centuries after the first
Olympic Games and the start of alphabetic writing, and approximately one cen-
tury before Alexander the Great demonstrated that it is possible to conquer the
world or what passed for it then. Fifty thousand citizens of Athens governed the
city and the city’s empire. Athenians did not settle disputes by brawling but rather
I
3 6 Part One • Metaphysics and Epistemology: Existence and Knowledge
by discussion and debate. Power was not achieved through wealth or physical
strength or skill with weapons; it was achieved through words. Rhetoricians, men
and women with sublime skill in debate, created plausible arguments for almost
any assertion and, for a fee, taught others to do it too.
These rhetoricians, the Western world’s first professors, were the Sophists.
They were interested in practical things, and few had patience with metaphysical
speculation. They demonstrated their rhetorical abilities by “proving” the seem-
ingly unprovable — that is, by attacking commonly held views. The net effect was
an examination and a critique of accepted standards of behavior within Athenian
society. In this way, moral philosophy began. We will return to this topic in
Chapter 10.
At the same time in the fifth century B.C.E., there also lived a stonemason with
a muscular build and a keen mind, Socrates [SOK-ruh-teez] (470–399 B.C.E.).
He wrote nothing, but we know quite a bit about him from Plato’s famous dia-
logues, in which Socrates almost always stars. (Plato’s later dialogues reflect
Plato’s own views, even though “Socrates” is doing the speaking in them. But we
are able to extract a reasonably detailed picture of Socrates from the earlier
dialogues.)
Given the spirit of the times, it is not surprising that Socrates shared some of
the philosophical interests and practices of the Sophists. We must imagine him
wandering about the city, engaging citizens in discussion and argument. He was a
brilliant debater, and he was idolized by.
1.2 PLATO’S ALLEGORY OF THE CAVEWe can follow some of Socrates’ TatianaMajor22
1.2 PLATO’S ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE
We can follow some of Socrates’ themes by exploring the ideas of Plato (c. 428–348 B.C.), Socrates’ most famous disciple. (Further biographical information on Plato can be found in section 3.2.) If we are to search for wisdom and to know how to live our lives, Plato believed, we must have a correct understanding of knowledge and reality. Plato’s view of reality, as well as his view of knowledge and personal enlightenment, is represented in his famous Allegory of the Cave, which has become a classic story in Western literature. In this allegory, Plato suggests the possibility that reality may be entirely different than our taken-for-granted assumptions suppose it to be. In telling this story, Plato uses the figure of his teacher Socrates to present his ideas. As you read the allegory, answer the following questions.
Can you imagine the scene in the cave Socrates describes? Sketch a picture of all the elements in the cave.
Glaucon says the people in the story are “strange prisoners.” Socrates then gives the stunning reply that they are “like ourselves.” Why do you suppose Socrates compares us to these prisoners?
30
This diagram of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave represents chained prisoners whose only reality is the shadow world projected on the wall in front of them. They are unaware that behind them is the higher degree of reality of the fire and the statues that are casting the shadows. Still further up is the steep and rugged passage out of the cave to the upper world. A prisoner who follows this path will encounter the world of real objects and the sun. Plato used this story as a rough analogy to the modes of awareness and levels of reality discussed in his philosophy.
What do the shadows stand for?
What are the “shadows” in our society? In your life?
According to this story, what is enlightenment?
In what sense does the freed prisoner not understand the shadows as well as his friends do when he returns to the cave? In what sense does he understand the shadows better than his friends do?
In what ways are the events in the enlightened prisoner’s life like the events in the historical Socrates’ life?
Summarize what philosophical points you think Plato is making in this allegory.
31
FROM PLATO
Republic10
SOCRATES: And now, let me show in a parable how far our nature is enlightened or unenlightened. Imagine human beings living in an underground den, which has a mouth open towards the light. Here they have been from their childhood, and have their legs and necks chained so that they can not move, and can only see before them, being prevented by the chains from turning their heads around. Above and behind them a fire is blazing at a distance, and between the fire and the prisoners there is a raised walk; and you will see, if you look, a low wall built along the walkway, like the screen which marionette players have in front of them, over which they show the puppets.
GLAUCON: I see.
SOCRATES: And do yo ...
The Allegory of the CaveAt the beginning of Book VII of Plato’s .docxtodd801
The Allegory of the Cave
At the beginning of Book VII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates famously invokes an image of human nature with respect to education and the lack of it, likening our situation to that of prisoners in a cave. Imagine an underground cave-like dwelling, its entrance entirely out of sight. Inhabiting this cave are human beings whose feet and necks are chained so that they can neither get up nor turn their heads; they can only see straight ahead. Above and behind them burns a fire, and between them and the fire there is a raised path and a low wall, like the screen above which performers display their puppets. Behind this wall men pass to and fro carrying statues and figures of human beings, animals, and other objects in such a manner that the artifacts appear over the top of the screen, projecting onto the wall opposite the fire. The prisoners, unable to see neither the objects carried behind them nor one another, behold only the shadows of themselves and of the statues cast onto the wall in front of them.
The prisoners represent the vast majority of the human race: “they’re like us.” They live in a world in which images are mistaken for realities. What is a shadow, after all, but a mere image of something real (in this case a statue, which is itself an image of something even more real, namely a living human being or animal)? Moreover, the prisoners have not the faintest clue that throughout their entire lives they have been exposed to nothing but distortions of the truth—they are, in other words, unaware of their ignorance (just like Euthyphro, the fanatical young priest about whom you will read in the next chapter). The shadows represent the authoritative opinions that govern the hearts and minds of whole communities, and give a transcendent purpose and meaning to our particular existence.[1] These shadows are to be contrasted with the light of truth illuminating the world beyond the cave (but which also makes the shadows visible within it). The people carrying the statues are the lawgivers and poets who establish the cultural values and cosmic worldview that characterize and define a given society. In his excellent commentary on Plato’s Republic, Professor Allan Bloom explains: “We do not see men as they are but as they are represented to us by legislators and poets. A Greek sees things differently from the way a Persian sees them. One need only think of…the significance of cows to Hindus as opposed to other men to realize how powerful are the various horizons constituted by law or convention.”[2] These authoritative opinions are not accurate reflections of nature, but rather a curious amalgam of natureandconvention. To quote once again from Professor Bloom: “The first and most difficult of tasks is the separation of what exists by nature from what is merely made by man.”[3]
This, precisely, is the business of philosophy, which literally means “the love of wisdom,” coming from the ancient Greek words philein, meaning “to .
1. Plato
427-347 BCE
Colleges and Credential Schools Attended
The
Academy
Allegory of the cave
“All the gold “It will be possible then, and only
There’s a cave with three
which is under then, when kings are philosophers or
levels. in the first level their is a
or upon the earth is not enough to philosopher kings.”
fire. In the second level there
give in exchange for virtue. In the Allegory of the cave
are people making shadow
-Plato There’s a cave with three levels. in
puppets. In the third level there
Gold may make you rich and it may the first level their is a fire. In the
are people chained to chairs
be pretty but its better to have second level there are people making
staring at the wall, they see the
virtue(be morally good). shadow puppets. In the third level
shadow puppets on the wall but
there are people chained to chairs
cant see the people making
Socrates : even though he didn’t staring at the wall, they see the
them. Plato is saying people
actually write anything, his major shadow puppets on the wall but cant
mistake appearance for reality.
contribution to philosophy was to see the people making them. Plato
redirect inquiries away from the is saying people mistake
natural science and brought them appearance for reality, and the only
Plato toward the consideration of systems people who can break out of these
“Be kind for everyone you meet of ethnics and questions of ethnical chains and get out of the cave are
is going through a harder battle.” conduct. philosophers. So the kings are
Be nice to everyone, even if they Plato: Plato’s idea of an absolute chained to these chairs they cant
aren’t nice to you because you form of good was similar to the see the reality to know how to be a
may not understand what’s going christian monotheistic God; in the king. So therefore kings need to be
on in their life. Christianizing roman empire philosopher kings.
Neoplatonism brought back Plato as
an early precursor of christian
doctrine.
2. Works Cited
"Allegory of the Cave." Allegory of the Cave. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Apr. 2012. <http://
faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/320/cave.htm>.
"Being a Responsible Company." Starbucks Coffee Company. Starbucks, n.d. Web. 05
Sept. 2012. <http://www.starbucks.com/responsibility>.
BrainyQuote. Xplore, n.d. Web. 06 Sept. 2012. <http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/
authors/p/plato.html>.
Byron, Tanya. "Digital Citizenship and Creative Rights A Teacher's Guide." Digital
Citizenship Education. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Sept. 2012. <http://digitalcitizenshiped.com/>.
"Democratic Underground Forums - Request Error." Democratic Underground Forums -
Request Error. N.p., Saturday Dec. 2006. Web. 06 Sept. 2012. <http://
www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all>.
Kemerling, Garth. "Plato." Plato. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Sept. 2012. <http://
www.philosophypages.com/ph/plat.htm>.
Kemerling, Garth. "Plato: The Republic 5-10." Plato: The Republic 5-10. N.p., n.d. Web.
06 Sept. 2012. <http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/2h.htm>.
"Plato Quotes." Plato Quotes (Author of The Republic). N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Sept. 2012.
<http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/879.Plato>.
Whitehead, John W. "The Right Not To Be Offended: The Supreme Court And Religion."
The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 22 Mar. 2010. Web. 05 Sept. 2012. <http://
www.huffingtonpost.com/john-w-whitehead/the-right-not-to-be-offen_b_508513.html>.
