Downloaded 31 times
![Result: Insufficient Funding for Technology
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Construction
Energy
Manufacturing
Transportation
Healthcare
Education
Finance
IT Spending as a % of Revenue, By Industry [Gartner 2014]
3.3%
Cross-Industry
Average
3.3x
Investment Gap](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/leanbim-journeybrazil-161010234054/75/My-Lean-BIM-Journey-Nathan-Wood-Brazil-Lean-Conference-67-2048.jpg)
![Key Factors Impacting Poor Cost & Schedule
[McKinsey]
Poor Organization Missed Connections
Inadequate
Communication
Poor Short Term
Planning
Flawed Performance
Management
Insufficient Risk
Management
Contractual
Misunderstandings
Limited Talent
Management
“Lack of Technology” isn’t the Root Cause](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/leanbim-journeybrazil-161010234054/75/My-Lean-BIM-Journey-Nathan-Wood-Brazil-Lean-Conference-73-2048.jpg)
More Related Content
Similar to My Lean + BIM Journey [Nathan Wood, Brazil Lean Conference]
My Lean + BIM Journey [Nathan Wood, Brazil Lean Conference]
- 1. MY LEAN +BIM JOURNEY Nathan Wood, Chief Enabling Officer @nathancwood @SpectrumAEC
- 2. Boulder, CO Austin, TX SanFrancisco, CA Falls Church, VA The Journey to DPR Construction & BIM
- 3. BIM Research Assignment:Abu Dhabi
- 4. DPR Consulting: Implementing5D Collaboration
- 5. www.bestppt.com People, Process, &Technology Mission
- 6. www.bestppt.com WHA THOW WHY ? BIM Definition US NationalBIM Standard v1, 2007 “A digital representation of physical and functional characteristics of a facility. A BIM is a shared knowledge resource for information about a facility forming a reliable basis for decisions during its life- cycle; defined as existing from earliest conception to demolition.”
- 7. SUTTER CASTRO VALLEY WHY:Sutter Health + OSHPD State Requirements Seismic Fault Lines San Francisco Bay, CA
- 8. Structure & FaçadeCoordinationWHAT: Detailed BIM of Structure & Façade
- 9. 30% Reduction in Schedule No Rework (MEP) As-Built Model Increase Field Crew Production HOW:BIM + Lean + Integrated Project Delivery
- 10. 3D Detailing andCoordination in Tekla Shop Drawing Generation is Direct Output from Tekla Model BIM Use: Direct 3D to 2D Field Drawings
- 11. The First Discovery:Rebar vs. Precast Sleeve • 200+ Facade penetrations or embed were coordinated with rebar and MEP. • Precast subcontractor did not originally account for rebar spacing during design. • Over 25% of Connection designs were changed due to BIM Coordination BIM Use: Precast Façade Connections
- 12. BIM = BetterProductivity & QualityBenefit: Quality Control + Increased Productivity DPR Concrete reported 10% Productivity Increase from BIM shop drawings process.
- 13. Architect Design Assist 3D Model DesignDrawings Shop Drawings Comments Permit Lesson Learned: Design Assist Permit Process
- 14. A Coordinated BIMis only as valuable as the deliverable that it produces! Design Drawings ? = ? Shop Drawings The Question Becomes…Risk: Design to Fabrication Reliability
- 15. How do youcheck?Countermeasure: 2D Fabrication to BIM Design Assist Subcontractors Provided CAD to Align in Tekla
- 16. From 2D ShopDrawings…..From 2D to 3D BIM ….. Not Lean, but Effective!
- 17. Precast 2D Elevation Elevation in FabModel BIM Use: Complex Detail Coordination (BIM + IPD)
- 18. Coordinated in theModel Revised Shop Drawing Benefit: BIM to Fabrication Reliability
- 19. BIM Use: 2DDetail Constructability Review
- 20. Tapered Roof InsulationBIMUse: Podium Roof Design Coordination • OSHPD requires minimum distance between roof penetrations • 30+ locations where tapered insulation fell above kicker connections • OPTION #1: Spend $50K + schedule delay to move existing screen posts
- 21. BIM + Lean:Last Responsible Moment • OPTION #2: Roof Slope redesigned 4 weeks prior to roof concrete pour • Required 3 new drains to be coordinated with existing MEP BIM
- 22. TRUST: CONSTRUCTABILITY INPUTHOW:Shared Risk & Reward with MEP Trades • Routed 3 additional drains to a nearby riser in BIM • New drainage calculation of the redesigned sloping • Confirmed LEED requirements of roof still held • Poured concrete roof slab on schedule
- 23. TRUST: TRADES INSTALLFROM BIMBIM Use: Automated Spool Fabrication from BIM Courtesy of McClanahan Plumbing
- 24. SYNERGY: BIM +TOTAL STATIONBIM Use: Integrated Total Station Layout Use of Robotic Total Station (RTS) in Conjunction with Coordinated MEP Inserts in BIM 4X Productivity Compared to Conventional Layout Courtesy of McClanahan Plumbing
- 25. Drywall Spool SheetsDirect from Coordinated BIM TRUST: IMPROVED FRAMING PROCESSBIM Use: Drywall Framing Productivity & Rework Credit: DPR Drywall
- 26. 50-95% Reduction in Rework Benefits: InstallationMetrics (Castro Valley) 0% 5% 10% Mech Plumb Electrical Drywall Rework (%) By Trade Baseline Actual 5-28% Increase in Productivity 0% 10% 20% 30% Mech Plumb Electrical Drywall Productivity Increase % By Trade Planned Actual
- 27. SUTTER CASTRO VALLEY SUTTERALTA BATES Fall 2010: Transferring Lessons to Alta Bates
- 28. New Project, NewRisks: Sutter Alta Bates Complex Project Site Unforseen Conditions Seismic Expansion Joint Connections
- 29. BIM Use: Modelingof Temporary Structures Rebar Scope Gap: Tower Crane Anchor Tower Crane Design: Height Requirement & Radius Limits
- 30. BIM Use: FaçadeConstructability Comments
- 31. Visual Pour Planning BIMUse: Concrete Planning & Layout Enhanced Concrete Lift Drawings Total Station Layout Integration
- 32. Project ChallengesRisk: BIMvs. Field Reliability ? = ?
- 33. Robotic Total Station Betterfor model vs. field comparison of large areas/entire site Countermeasure: Digital As-Builting Better for specific points (end of wall, bottom of door threshold, etc) Laser Scanning
- 34. Courtesy of TrimbleNavigation ltd. BIM Use: Modeling of Unforseen Conditions
- 35. Design allows formaximum 3” tolerance for placement of piles As-Built pile layout showed deviations up to 12” in more difficult locations Risk: Misplaced Piles & Rebar Design Changes
- 36. Robotic Total Stationpoints were captured immediately following pile placement to early identify misplaced piles and begin design change and approval process Within Tolerance Out of Tolerance – Change in Rebar Out of Tolerance –No Rebar Changes BIM Use: Digital Check for Deviations
- 37. BIM Use: Coordinationof Rebar & Structural Steel 2D constructability markup Steel Plate Penetrations Aligned with new Rebar Design
- 38. The Process 2D Shop Drawings ShopDrawing Review Fabricate Rebar Install Rebar 3D Model Lean Innovation: Cloud Rebar Submittal Reviews
- 39. Cloud Comment Responses= No Resubmittal
- 40. BIM Use: Macro4D Visualization of Trades
- 41. 1. Pour Concrete BasementWalls 2. Erect Steel Frame 3. Follow behind with Concrete Core Walls BIM Use: Micro 4D Constructability Analysis
- 42. 4D Clash: WeldingAccess
- 43. 4D Clash: WeldingAccess
- 44. Form 2’x2’ openingin wall for welding access Leave out section of wall prior to steel Communicate Design Changes in BIM
- 45. Patch opening after weldingcomplete Communicate Design Changes in BIM
- 46. Pour section with corewall BIM Enabled Design Change Approvals
- 47. Risk: Civil/Structural DesignCoordination
- 48. BIM Use: Overlayof Revit Structure & Civil 3D
- 49. Countermeasure: Define RebarDesign in BIM
- 50. Pull 2D Detailfrom BIM for OSHPD Drawing
- 51. Integrate x,y,z TotalStation Layout from BIM
- 52. = Success Metric: EarlySchedule Savings Concrete Foundations 31 Days Of Critical Path Schedule Recovered over 10 Months 33% Time Savings Per Submittal Review
- 54. A Tale ofTwo Projects: IPD Lessons Learned Castro Valley Delivered 6 Weeks Ahead of Schedule Maintained Target Cost Alta Bates Delivered 6 Months Behind Schedule 20 Million Over Target Cost
- 55.
- 56. The Castro ValleyDifference: Culture Team members chorus: Don’t try this with strangers. Expect lengthy contract negotiations and endless meetings. Be vigilant about communicating. “The actual effort required was underestimated on both the design and construction sides,” says James Mobley, a Devenney principal.
- 57. The Tipping Pointof BIM Value Starts with….
- 58. Design Model vsConstruction Model Composite Overlay Design Model Fabrication Model Reactive Quality Control of Design Hanoff
- 59. Exposed Areas ofPoor Communication
- 60. TOOL SHIFTING THE INDUSTRYPARADIGM PEOPLE PROCESS BIM is just a Tool1 This Tool is only as good as the People using It 2 The People can only be as effective as the Process allows them to be 3 The Role of BIM in Design & Construction
- 61. Christian, D., Bredbury,J., Emdanat, S., Haase, F., Kunz, A., Rubel, Z. and Ballard, G. (2014). “Four-phase project delivery and the pathway to perfection.” In: Proc. 22nd Ann. Conf. of the Int’l Group for Lean Construction, IGLC-22, Oslo, Norway, June 25- 27. Available at <www.iglc.net> Trust in BIM Starts with Lean Handoffs
- 62. 3D Model 2DDrawings DesignFabrication 62 Challenge: BIM Handoffs in the Real World
- 63. • Does this….. •Equal this? Design Model Fabrication Model Risk: Loss of Reliable BIM for Coordination
- 64. 64 Risk: BIM CoordinationSequence & LOD
- 65. 3D Model 2DDrawings DesignerDetailer 65 Risk: New Process, Old Contract?
- 66. “Virtually everyone inthe construction supply chain works on contracts where the incentive is to maximize their gain at the expense of others” Macomber, John D. 2003 ASCE Report: “Follow the Money: What Really Drives Technology Innovation In Construction” Root Cause Analysis: Contract Incentives
- 67. Result: Insufficient Fundingfor Technology 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Construction Energy Manufacturing Transportation Healthcare Education Finance IT Spending as a % of Revenue, By Industry [Gartner 2014] 3.3% Cross-Industry Average 3.3x Investment Gap
- 68. ARE WE RIPEFOR DISRUPTION? “It’s more likely…that new firms with new business models and new areas of focus will leverage the financial and technological innovations that will change the nature of competition” -Clayton Christensen, 1997 The Future of BIM Adoption in USA IPD Contract Relationship - Design-Build Contract Structure - ? = ?
- 69. “BIM-Centric” “Data-Centric” 2012 2016 69 TheLanguage of BIM has Evolved
- 70. Data Centric Integration Brings Efficiency& Reliability Drawing Centric Task Centric BIM Centric Time Centric Media Centric Integrated BIM Requires Integrated Data
- 71. Where is Brazilalong the ‘BIM Hype’ Journey?
- 72. Integrated BIM isOur Most Valuable Tool
- 73. Key Factors ImpactingPoor Cost & Schedule [McKinsey] Poor Organization Missed Connections Inadequate Communication Poor Short Term Planning Flawed Performance Management Insufficient Risk Management Contractual Misunderstandings Limited Talent Management “Lack of Technology” isn’t the Root Cause
- 74. It Starts withthe Right People in the Right Place
- 75. Efficient Data Capture Reliable Data Analytics Solvingthe BIM + Lean Dilemma
- 76.
- 77. Assess Align Advance Adoptionof BIM Requires Early Input
- 78. Profitable BIM Requiresa Balance Between BIM & Data Standards Aligned Purpose & Behaviors Lean Process Innovation
- 79.
Editor's Notes
- #9 Concrete shear walls along perimeter on L1-3 Congested reinforcing in boundary elements 500 wall embeds and penetrations for precast
- #35 As unforseen conditions were discovered, trimble total station was used to document as-built location of obstructions, so that we could bring them into the model to see what future construction it would impact
- #61 TRAINER NOTE: We are shifting our mindset away from the notion that everyone needs to know everything about BIM. Instead, we should be thinking about BIM as a Construction Tool that needs to be used by the right people at the right time to input construction knowledge into the model. And we need to make sure that our BIM processes are aligned with our current roles, so that it doesn’t create additional work. ADDITIONAL INFO: Bullet point 3 can seem controversial at first. What we’re trying to say is that a poorly planned process (or no process at all) can limit a person’s ability to perform – regardless of experience, talent, knowledge, etc. Example: Navisworks is a particular BIM tool. If I were an expert at using Navisworks, but had no idea how to apply that to coordinating building systems – my skills would be useless. The process can be “make or break”.
- #63 Animation describes the current process from a designer revit model to flattened 2D drawings for steel fabrication.