PANEL A                                            r
•The IS schedule is steep, investment is                        LMo
relatively
 interest inelastic
                                                r1
•Less sensitive the investment is to interest
rate, more effective fiscal policy.
                                                r0               ∆G= 1
• The horizontal distance of the shift in the                      (1-b)
schedule ∆G [1/ (1-b) ] meaning that the size
of the policy action as well as the
autonomous expenditure multiplier that the
simple Keynesian model as equal.                               ISo    ISı
                                                                            y
• When G rises, Y rises
 r must rises to keep the money market in             y0 yı
equilibrium
 The rise in r causes investment to fall,
partially offsetting the expansionary effect of
the increase in G.
 Interest rate induced declined in I causes
income response given by the multiplier.
• Income rises by less than the horizontal
shift in IS
r
 PANEL B
• Shows the effects of an increase in
government spending in the case of a                                  LMo
relatively flat IS schedule.
• The increase in government spending shifts         r1
                                                                      ∆G= 1
                                                     r0
the IS schedule from IS0 to IS1                                         (1-b)
• The horizontal distance of the shift in the
schedule ∆G [1/ (1-b) ] meaning that the size                                   ISı
of the policy action as well as the autonomous                              ISo
                                                                                      y
expenditure multiplier that the simple                        y0 yı
Keynesian model as equal.
• This fiscal policy action is much less effective
in panel B, where the IS schedule is relatively
flat.
• Income in Panel B, increased less than
income Panel A because fiscal policy more
effective when IS steep(low interest elasticity).
r
                                                            ISo ISı
PANEL C                                                                 LMo
•The case of the vertical IS schedule shown
that
                                                   r0
investment completely interest- insensitive.

•Increase in G                                     r1                 ∆G= 1
                                                                        (1-b)
 interest rate rises but does not result in any
decline in investment.
Investment increases by full amount of the                                     y
distance of horizontal shift in IS.                         yı   y0
There is no crowding out of investment.

• The increase in government spending
causes the interest rate to rise, but this rise
does not result in investment.

• In conclusion, fiscal policy more effective
when IS steep(low interest elasticity)

Makro silide

  • 1.
    PANEL A r •The IS schedule is steep, investment is LMo relatively interest inelastic r1 •Less sensitive the investment is to interest rate, more effective fiscal policy. r0 ∆G= 1 • The horizontal distance of the shift in the (1-b) schedule ∆G [1/ (1-b) ] meaning that the size of the policy action as well as the autonomous expenditure multiplier that the simple Keynesian model as equal. ISo ISı y • When G rises, Y rises  r must rises to keep the money market in y0 yı equilibrium  The rise in r causes investment to fall, partially offsetting the expansionary effect of the increase in G.  Interest rate induced declined in I causes income response given by the multiplier. • Income rises by less than the horizontal shift in IS
  • 2.
    r PANEL B •Shows the effects of an increase in government spending in the case of a LMo relatively flat IS schedule. • The increase in government spending shifts r1 ∆G= 1 r0 the IS schedule from IS0 to IS1 (1-b) • The horizontal distance of the shift in the schedule ∆G [1/ (1-b) ] meaning that the size ISı of the policy action as well as the autonomous ISo y expenditure multiplier that the simple y0 yı Keynesian model as equal. • This fiscal policy action is much less effective in panel B, where the IS schedule is relatively flat. • Income in Panel B, increased less than income Panel A because fiscal policy more effective when IS steep(low interest elasticity).
  • 3.
    r ISo ISı PANEL C LMo •The case of the vertical IS schedule shown that r0 investment completely interest- insensitive. •Increase in G r1 ∆G= 1 (1-b)  interest rate rises but does not result in any decline in investment. Investment increases by full amount of the y distance of horizontal shift in IS. yı y0 There is no crowding out of investment. • The increase in government spending causes the interest rate to rise, but this rise does not result in investment. • In conclusion, fiscal policy more effective when IS steep(low interest elasticity)