This document provides a list of publications by Matthias Kaiser organized by type: books (authored or co-authored), books or journal issues edited, articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and articles in book anthologies or proceedings. It includes over 90 publications spanning from 1979 to 2017 covering a wide range of topics including science and ethics, the precautionary principle, food ethics, and aquaculture sustainability.
This curriculum vitae summarizes the career and qualifications of Dr. Mathew M. Edavettal. He is board certified in general surgery and surgical critical care, and currently works as a trauma surgeon and critical care physician. He has extensive experience in trauma guidelines development and research presentations. He also has a background in teaching and international medical mission work.
This document provides an overview of various ed-tech tools and learning platforms:
Edmodo allows teachers to create online learning communities for collaboration. Google and Haiku Learning are also mentioned. A Haiku Class has been created for the workshop.
Haiku is described as a learning platform for creating lessons. A wiki is defined as a website that allows visitors to add, remove, edit, and change content through collaboration.
Learning management systems (LMS) are discussed. Free LMS providers are listed.
The document focuses on exploring Haiku as a learning tool and wiki platforms for collaboration. It provides instructions on adding pages and editing content within Haiku.
Edmodo Spotlight is introduced as a
Este documento trata sobre la glándula tiroides, incluyendo su embriología, anatomía, fisiología, exámen físico, y varias patologías como hipotiroidismo, tiroiditis de Hashimoto, enfermedad de Graves y bocio multinodular tóxico. Explica las causas, síntomas, signos, diagnóstico y tratamiento de estas afecciones tiroideas.
This curriculum vitae summarizes the career and qualifications of Dr. Mathew M. Edavettal. He is board certified in general surgery and surgical critical care, and currently works as a trauma surgeon and critical care physician. He has extensive experience in trauma guidelines development and research presentations. He also has a background in teaching and international medical mission work.
This document provides an overview of various ed-tech tools and learning platforms:
Edmodo allows teachers to create online learning communities for collaboration. Google and Haiku Learning are also mentioned. A Haiku Class has been created for the workshop.
Haiku is described as a learning platform for creating lessons. A wiki is defined as a website that allows visitors to add, remove, edit, and change content through collaboration.
Learning management systems (LMS) are discussed. Free LMS providers are listed.
The document focuses on exploring Haiku as a learning tool and wiki platforms for collaboration. It provides instructions on adding pages and editing content within Haiku.
Edmodo Spotlight is introduced as a
Este documento trata sobre la glándula tiroides, incluyendo su embriología, anatomía, fisiología, exámen físico, y varias patologías como hipotiroidismo, tiroiditis de Hashimoto, enfermedad de Graves y bocio multinodular tóxico. Explica las causas, síntomas, signos, diagnóstico y tratamiento de estas afecciones tiroideas.
This curriculum vitae summarizes Lauren Hartzell Nichols' academic employment and education history. She is currently an Affiliate Assistant Professor at the University of Washington where she has held various teaching positions since 2009. Her primary areas of research and teaching are in climate ethics and environmental ethics. She received her PhD from Stanford University in 2009 and has published numerous peer-reviewed articles and book chapters on topics related to the precautionary principle and climate change policy.
An A Priori Argument The Argument From Causal PowersGina Rizzo
This document provides a summary of Robert A. Wilson's academic background and areas of research. It lists his current position as a Professor with tenure in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Alberta. It also outlines his previous academic positions, education history, areas of philosophical specialization and competence, recent research topics, publications, and other professional activities. The document serves to concisely convey Robert A. Wilson's qualifications and philosophical work.
The document discusses the history and goals of alchemy, which marked a shift from philosophical inquiry to experimental investigation. Alchemists sought to transform cheap metals into gold, create an elixir of life and universal medicine, and understand God through symbolism. Their work laid the foundations for modern chemistry through thousands of years of human experimentation and questioning how matter changes. Studying alchemy can help students understand the scientific process and misconceptions around topics like turning metals into gold or achieving immortality.
With regard to evolution, creatures who refuse to learn deserve extinction. What about our own profession? Do we maybe ‘refuse to learn’ from digitisation that it is not just work practices and business models which are being transformed? Does the post-truth era question the very function of ‘journalists’ as dedicated intermediaries? What is it that enables or prevents us from adapting to the changing media environments?
This keynote at the European Science Journalism Conference 2017 introduced a new model of “Disintermediation in Science Communication”. The concept which was originally coined in economics, describes the structural loss of journalists as intermediaries in the knowledge-creation and -transfer processes. The research is based on the world’s first full-text content analysis of every science press release published digitally in German academia.
Discussion 2 Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Methods .docxJeniceStuckeyoo
Discussion 2: Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Methods in Cross-Cultural Research
In cross-cultural psychology research, a broad range of techniques is utilized to determine the best way to access critical data. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages. For example, laboratory experiments may offer great control and ability to examine issues of cause and effect, but may not always reflect actual real-world conditions, especially in cross cultural situations. As an additional example, long term field work and interviews conducted by living in a given cultural setting for a year or two, may offer the possibility of many nuanced observations, yet such qualitative work will not lead to statistical or experimental designs. Each method tends to have pros and cons, rather than one method being the "right" one for every situation. For this Discussion, you will explore the advantages and disadvantages of using different research methods in cross-cultural research.
Post
and explain one advantage and one disadvantage of quantitative research for cross-cultural psychology. Then, describe one advantage and one disadvantage of qualitative research for cross-cultural psychology. Use examples from the studies provided to support your thinking.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Karasz, A., & Singelis, T. M. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods research in cross-cultural psychology: Introduction to the special issue.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40
(6), 909–916
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs.
Quality and Quantity, 43
(2), 265–275. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
Malda, M., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Srinivasan, K., Transler, C., Sukumar, P., & Rao, K. (2008). Adapting a cognitive test for a different culture: An illustration of qualitative procedures.
Psychology Science Quarterly, 50
(4), 451–468.
Miller, K. E., Omidian, P., Quraishy, A. S., Quraishy, N., Nasiry, M. N., Nasiry, S.,... & Yaqubi, A. A. (2006). The Afghan symptom checklist: A culturally grounded approach to mental health assessment in a conflict zone.
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76
(4), 423–433.
Rich, G., Sirikantraporn, S., & Jean-Charles, W. (2018). The concept of posttraumatic growth in an adult sample from Port-Au-Prince, Haiti: A mixed methods study. In G. Rich & S. Sirikantraporn (Eds.),
Human strengths and resilience: Developmental, cross-cultural, and international Perspectives
(pp. 21–38).Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Credit Line: International Differences in Well-Being, by Diener, J.; Helliwell, J. ; Kahneman, D. Copyright 2010 by Oxford University Press. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2009). Types of comparative studies in cross-cultural psychology.
Online readings in psychology and culture, 2
(2), pp.1–12.
Credit Line: Fons J. R. van de Vijver. (2009). Types of Comparative Studies in Cross.
This curriculum vitae outlines the education and research interests of Dr. Ioannis Spanos. He received his first certificate from Aristotle University of Thessaloniki in 1982, his PhD from the same university in 1992 on the structure analysis and regeneration of Pinus brutia, and conducted post-doctoral research at the University of Aberdeen in 1993 on the effects of infection on Betula pubescens growth. His research interests include silviculture, forest ecology, plantations, biodiversity, and sustainable forest management. He has published extensively in international journals, books, and conferences on these topics.
This document is a 5-page CV for William E. Stout. It outlines his education, research interests, publications, presentations, employment experience and grants/fellowships. He has a PhD in Land Resources from UW-Madison and teaches biology and chemistry at Oconomowoc High School. His primary research focuses on conservation biology, landscape ecology and raptor ecology, especially related to urban wildlife populations.
Discussion 1 Challenges to Cross-Cultural ResearchChallenge.docxEstelaJeffery653
Discussion 1: Challenges to Cross-Cultural Research
Challenges to cross-cultural research are ample and significant. Pragmatic issues may preclude long term immersion in the culture due to financial issues or lack of sufficient time. Additionally, translation issues may make it difficult to achieve a one–to-one correspondence on questionnaire items used in multiple cultures and languages. Additionally, there are often delicate negotiations across gender, age, status, religious, and economic backgrounds that can involve power and privilege in ways that require careful and appropriate discussion to resolve ethically and to preserve the integrity of the research, researchers, and research participants. As you move forward in your future professional work, take the time to consider the challenges researchers face in light of growing need to further understand the diverse cultures in the world at large. You will find that this type of research will be critically important to further your professional growth and knowledge.
For this Discussion, you will examine the challenges to cross-cultural research.
To Prepare
Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the types of challenges researchers face when conducting cross-cultural research.
Post
and explain three major challenges to conducting cross-cultural research. Then, suggest one way to solve one of the challenges.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Karasz, A., & Singelis, T. M. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods research in cross-cultural psychology: Introduction to the special issue.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40
(6), 909–916
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs.
Quality and Quantity, 43
(2), 265–275. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
Malda, M., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Srinivasan, K., Transler, C., Sukumar, P., & Rao, K. (2008). Adapting a cognitive test for a different culture: An illustration of qualitative procedures.
Psychology Science Quarterly, 50
(4), 451–468.
Miller, K. E., Omidian, P., Quraishy, A. S., Quraishy, N., Nasiry, M. N., Nasiry, S.,... & Yaqubi, A. A. (2006). The Afghan symptom checklist: A culturally grounded approach to mental health assessment in a conflict zone.
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76
(4), 423–433.
Rich, G., Sirikantraporn, S., & Jean-Charles, W. (2018). The concept of posttraumatic growth in an adult sample from Port-Au-Prince, Haiti: A mixed methods study. In G. Rich & S. Sirikantraporn (Eds.),
Human strengths and resilience: Developmental, cross-cultural, and international Perspectives
(pp. 21–38).Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Credit Line: International Differences in Well-Being, by Diener, J.; Helliwell, J. ; Kahneman, D. Copyright 2010 by Oxford University Press. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2009). Types of comparative studies in cross-cultural psychology.
Online readings.
Gardens in Rehabilitation Bibliography - Legacy Therapeutic
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214 ~
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079 ~
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348 ~
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440 ~
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110 ~
Future(s) of mineral exploration - Sykes et al - Apr 2017 - Centre for Explor...John Sykes
This document summarizes the key findings from a study using scenario planning to explore the future of minerals exploration. The study investigated uncertainties around predicting the economic viability and accessibility of undiscovered mineral deposits. Three main scenarios were developed: 1) the industry adapts to emerging changes, 2) new ideas are generated to open up new exploration opportunities, and 3) the future may be difficult to foresee even with scenario planning. The study highlights opportunities around exploring new commodities, behind socio-political and geopolitical barriers, and notes limitations in the industry's ability to develop new ideas beyond optimizing existing asset portfolios. Scenario planning was used to compare exploration strategies against multiple potential futures rather than making single predictions.
T. Pradeu & M. Lemoine: Philosophy in Science: Definition and Boundariesjemille6
Do philosophers of science frequently contribute to science, and if so how? Bibliometrics helps assess how surprisingly big is the corpus of papers authored or co-authored by philosophers and published in science. Indeed, several hundreds of philosophers have published in scientific journals. It is also possible to assess how influential this work has been in terms of citations, as compared to the average number of citations in the same journals in the same year. Unsurprisingly, many of these papers authored or co-authored by philosophers and published in scientific journals are poorly cited while a handful of them are widely cited. However, the most interesting result is that there is a significant corpus of papers authored by philosophers (both published in science journals and in philosophy journals) and significantly cited in science. It is more difficult, albeit crucial, to identify the most contributive philosophical papers, namely, those which have penetrated science not only through publication or citation in science journals, but also through discussion or endorsement by some scientists.
Based on the identification of this often neglected corpus, which we propose to call "philosophy in science" (PinS), it becomes possible to describe the most central features of this particular way of doing philosophy of science. The first feature is bibliographic: philosophers in science tend to cite little philosophy and a lot of (up-to-date) science. Second, they also address a scientific question rather than a philosophical question. Third, in doing so, they use traditional tools of philosophy of science, typically and mostly, conceptual analysis, explication of implicit claims, examination of the consistency of claims, assessment of the relevance of methods or models. More rarely, but very interestingly, they also make positive and original contributions by bridging domains of science or suggesting hypotheses.
This different context – in particular, the specific requirements for a publication in a peer-reviewed science journal – transforms philosophy of science. Is it still philosophy? What is the difference with approaches such as "philosophy of science in practice", "complementary science", "scientific philosophy", "theory of science", and naturalism? PinS faces a double "impostor syndrome": not entirely philosophical for philosophers, and not entirely scientific for scientists. In conclusion, we will explore how PinS can respond to this double challenge.
Women's Standpoints on Nature: What Makes Them Possible?
Sandra Harding
Osiris, Vol. 12, Women, Gender, and Science: New Directions (1997), pp. 186-200 (
Consumer Culture Theory and Tattoo: Ink Subculture or Mass Consumer Practice?Federica Palumbo
Research Poster presented at Consumer Culture Theory Conference "Mapping Consumer Culture. Latitudes, Legends and Declination". June 26-29, Helsinki, Finland.
Rajeev Ahuja is a professor at Uppsala University in Sweden. He received his M.Sc. in Physics in 1991 and his doctoral degree in Solid State Physics in 1991. He has held various academic positions including visiting professorships. He has supervised over 60 doctoral students and 30 postdoctoral researchers. He has published over 845 publications in international journals including high-impact journals like Nature, Science, and Physical Review Letters. He has received several prestigious awards and honors for his research contributions.
This document summarizes research being conducted at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario. It features three young researchers at the Queen's Cancer Research Institute who are approaching cancer research in different but interconnected ways. It also profiles several other Queen's researchers studying topics like Renaissance imagery, international criminal law, and risk analysis. The document emphasizes that younger generations of scholars are leading innovation in fields like digital scholarship and data-driven research.
This document provides an overview of the conceptual framework and course for a biodiversity conservation class. It discusses key messages around biodiversity loss and the need for sustainability education. The conceptual framework will focus on landscape change and habitat fragmentation as threats. It introduces conceptual landscape models from a human and species perspective. The course will include lectures, tutorials, discussion forums, a field trip, and practical sessions. Assessments will include tutorial facilitation, essays, and a research paper following the field trip.
This document provides an introduction from the Dean of the College of Arts & Sciences at the University at Albany. It discusses how the College is the intellectual core of the University and highlights some of the research, scholarship and creative works produced by faculty over the past year. The Dean expresses pride in the breadth and complexity of work across disciplines. Brief summaries are provided of some faculty publications and projects from various departments, including Anthropology, Linguistics, Psychology and others. The goal is to share faculty accomplishments more widely within the University community.
This document summarizes several theories of cognitive and psychological aging from biological, psychological, and social science perspectives.
1. Biological theories propose mechanisms of aging including free radical damage, caloric restriction, genetic damage, hormonal changes, and immune system decline. Stress theories also examine how neuroendocrine reactivity influences aging patterns.
2. Psychological theories include theories of cognition that examine declines in fluid abilities versus maintenance of crystallized abilities. Everyday competence theories analyze how cognition relates to adaptive behavior.
3. Theories have evolved from broad conceptual frameworks to more targeted models informed by empirical research using longitudinal and cohort analysis methods. No single overarching psychological aging theory exists, but major focus areas include cognition, competence
John H. Holland is a professor of computer science and engineering and psychology at the University of Michigan. He received his BS in physics from MIT and his PhD in computer science from the University of Michigan. His research interests include complex adaptive systems, the theory of adaptive systems both natural and artificial, and cognitive processes. He has published extensively in these areas and advised 49 PhD students.
This case study examines a design studio course during the COVID-19 pandemic that aimed to illustrate the intersection between air ventilation and educational inequality. The studio responded in real-time to evidence about the pandemic and proposed retrofitting designs for an existing school. The design process incorporated research elements such as establishing a theoretical foundation on indoor safety guidelines and the history of the fresh air movement in schools. Students developed hypotheses and design proposals, which underwent review. This design simulation process reflected how design can be part of research by generating knowledge through reflection on the designs. The case study demonstrates how research and design inform each other, with design proposals validating or challenging original hypotheses to result in a research thesis.
More Related Content
Similar to List of publications for Matthias Kaiser 18
This curriculum vitae summarizes Lauren Hartzell Nichols' academic employment and education history. She is currently an Affiliate Assistant Professor at the University of Washington where she has held various teaching positions since 2009. Her primary areas of research and teaching are in climate ethics and environmental ethics. She received her PhD from Stanford University in 2009 and has published numerous peer-reviewed articles and book chapters on topics related to the precautionary principle and climate change policy.
An A Priori Argument The Argument From Causal PowersGina Rizzo
This document provides a summary of Robert A. Wilson's academic background and areas of research. It lists his current position as a Professor with tenure in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Alberta. It also outlines his previous academic positions, education history, areas of philosophical specialization and competence, recent research topics, publications, and other professional activities. The document serves to concisely convey Robert A. Wilson's qualifications and philosophical work.
The document discusses the history and goals of alchemy, which marked a shift from philosophical inquiry to experimental investigation. Alchemists sought to transform cheap metals into gold, create an elixir of life and universal medicine, and understand God through symbolism. Their work laid the foundations for modern chemistry through thousands of years of human experimentation and questioning how matter changes. Studying alchemy can help students understand the scientific process and misconceptions around topics like turning metals into gold or achieving immortality.
With regard to evolution, creatures who refuse to learn deserve extinction. What about our own profession? Do we maybe ‘refuse to learn’ from digitisation that it is not just work practices and business models which are being transformed? Does the post-truth era question the very function of ‘journalists’ as dedicated intermediaries? What is it that enables or prevents us from adapting to the changing media environments?
This keynote at the European Science Journalism Conference 2017 introduced a new model of “Disintermediation in Science Communication”. The concept which was originally coined in economics, describes the structural loss of journalists as intermediaries in the knowledge-creation and -transfer processes. The research is based on the world’s first full-text content analysis of every science press release published digitally in German academia.
Discussion 2 Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Methods .docxJeniceStuckeyoo
Discussion 2: Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Methods in Cross-Cultural Research
In cross-cultural psychology research, a broad range of techniques is utilized to determine the best way to access critical data. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages. For example, laboratory experiments may offer great control and ability to examine issues of cause and effect, but may not always reflect actual real-world conditions, especially in cross cultural situations. As an additional example, long term field work and interviews conducted by living in a given cultural setting for a year or two, may offer the possibility of many nuanced observations, yet such qualitative work will not lead to statistical or experimental designs. Each method tends to have pros and cons, rather than one method being the "right" one for every situation. For this Discussion, you will explore the advantages and disadvantages of using different research methods in cross-cultural research.
Post
and explain one advantage and one disadvantage of quantitative research for cross-cultural psychology. Then, describe one advantage and one disadvantage of qualitative research for cross-cultural psychology. Use examples from the studies provided to support your thinking.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Karasz, A., & Singelis, T. M. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods research in cross-cultural psychology: Introduction to the special issue.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40
(6), 909–916
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs.
Quality and Quantity, 43
(2), 265–275. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
Malda, M., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Srinivasan, K., Transler, C., Sukumar, P., & Rao, K. (2008). Adapting a cognitive test for a different culture: An illustration of qualitative procedures.
Psychology Science Quarterly, 50
(4), 451–468.
Miller, K. E., Omidian, P., Quraishy, A. S., Quraishy, N., Nasiry, M. N., Nasiry, S.,... & Yaqubi, A. A. (2006). The Afghan symptom checklist: A culturally grounded approach to mental health assessment in a conflict zone.
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76
(4), 423–433.
Rich, G., Sirikantraporn, S., & Jean-Charles, W. (2018). The concept of posttraumatic growth in an adult sample from Port-Au-Prince, Haiti: A mixed methods study. In G. Rich & S. Sirikantraporn (Eds.),
Human strengths and resilience: Developmental, cross-cultural, and international Perspectives
(pp. 21–38).Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Credit Line: International Differences in Well-Being, by Diener, J.; Helliwell, J. ; Kahneman, D. Copyright 2010 by Oxford University Press. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2009). Types of comparative studies in cross-cultural psychology.
Online readings in psychology and culture, 2
(2), pp.1–12.
Credit Line: Fons J. R. van de Vijver. (2009). Types of Comparative Studies in Cross.
This curriculum vitae outlines the education and research interests of Dr. Ioannis Spanos. He received his first certificate from Aristotle University of Thessaloniki in 1982, his PhD from the same university in 1992 on the structure analysis and regeneration of Pinus brutia, and conducted post-doctoral research at the University of Aberdeen in 1993 on the effects of infection on Betula pubescens growth. His research interests include silviculture, forest ecology, plantations, biodiversity, and sustainable forest management. He has published extensively in international journals, books, and conferences on these topics.
This document is a 5-page CV for William E. Stout. It outlines his education, research interests, publications, presentations, employment experience and grants/fellowships. He has a PhD in Land Resources from UW-Madison and teaches biology and chemistry at Oconomowoc High School. His primary research focuses on conservation biology, landscape ecology and raptor ecology, especially related to urban wildlife populations.
Discussion 1 Challenges to Cross-Cultural ResearchChallenge.docxEstelaJeffery653
Discussion 1: Challenges to Cross-Cultural Research
Challenges to cross-cultural research are ample and significant. Pragmatic issues may preclude long term immersion in the culture due to financial issues or lack of sufficient time. Additionally, translation issues may make it difficult to achieve a one–to-one correspondence on questionnaire items used in multiple cultures and languages. Additionally, there are often delicate negotiations across gender, age, status, religious, and economic backgrounds that can involve power and privilege in ways that require careful and appropriate discussion to resolve ethically and to preserve the integrity of the research, researchers, and research participants. As you move forward in your future professional work, take the time to consider the challenges researchers face in light of growing need to further understand the diverse cultures in the world at large. You will find that this type of research will be critically important to further your professional growth and knowledge.
For this Discussion, you will examine the challenges to cross-cultural research.
To Prepare
Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the types of challenges researchers face when conducting cross-cultural research.
Post
and explain three major challenges to conducting cross-cultural research. Then, suggest one way to solve one of the challenges.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Karasz, A., & Singelis, T. M. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods research in cross-cultural psychology: Introduction to the special issue.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40
(6), 909–916
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs.
Quality and Quantity, 43
(2), 265–275. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
Malda, M., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Srinivasan, K., Transler, C., Sukumar, P., & Rao, K. (2008). Adapting a cognitive test for a different culture: An illustration of qualitative procedures.
Psychology Science Quarterly, 50
(4), 451–468.
Miller, K. E., Omidian, P., Quraishy, A. S., Quraishy, N., Nasiry, M. N., Nasiry, S.,... & Yaqubi, A. A. (2006). The Afghan symptom checklist: A culturally grounded approach to mental health assessment in a conflict zone.
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76
(4), 423–433.
Rich, G., Sirikantraporn, S., & Jean-Charles, W. (2018). The concept of posttraumatic growth in an adult sample from Port-Au-Prince, Haiti: A mixed methods study. In G. Rich & S. Sirikantraporn (Eds.),
Human strengths and resilience: Developmental, cross-cultural, and international Perspectives
(pp. 21–38).Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Credit Line: International Differences in Well-Being, by Diener, J.; Helliwell, J. ; Kahneman, D. Copyright 2010 by Oxford University Press. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2009). Types of comparative studies in cross-cultural psychology.
Online readings.
Gardens in Rehabilitation Bibliography - Legacy Therapeutic
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214 ~
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079 ~
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348 ~
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440 ~
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110 ~
Future(s) of mineral exploration - Sykes et al - Apr 2017 - Centre for Explor...John Sykes
This document summarizes the key findings from a study using scenario planning to explore the future of minerals exploration. The study investigated uncertainties around predicting the economic viability and accessibility of undiscovered mineral deposits. Three main scenarios were developed: 1) the industry adapts to emerging changes, 2) new ideas are generated to open up new exploration opportunities, and 3) the future may be difficult to foresee even with scenario planning. The study highlights opportunities around exploring new commodities, behind socio-political and geopolitical barriers, and notes limitations in the industry's ability to develop new ideas beyond optimizing existing asset portfolios. Scenario planning was used to compare exploration strategies against multiple potential futures rather than making single predictions.
T. Pradeu & M. Lemoine: Philosophy in Science: Definition and Boundariesjemille6
Do philosophers of science frequently contribute to science, and if so how? Bibliometrics helps assess how surprisingly big is the corpus of papers authored or co-authored by philosophers and published in science. Indeed, several hundreds of philosophers have published in scientific journals. It is also possible to assess how influential this work has been in terms of citations, as compared to the average number of citations in the same journals in the same year. Unsurprisingly, many of these papers authored or co-authored by philosophers and published in scientific journals are poorly cited while a handful of them are widely cited. However, the most interesting result is that there is a significant corpus of papers authored by philosophers (both published in science journals and in philosophy journals) and significantly cited in science. It is more difficult, albeit crucial, to identify the most contributive philosophical papers, namely, those which have penetrated science not only through publication or citation in science journals, but also through discussion or endorsement by some scientists.
Based on the identification of this often neglected corpus, which we propose to call "philosophy in science" (PinS), it becomes possible to describe the most central features of this particular way of doing philosophy of science. The first feature is bibliographic: philosophers in science tend to cite little philosophy and a lot of (up-to-date) science. Second, they also address a scientific question rather than a philosophical question. Third, in doing so, they use traditional tools of philosophy of science, typically and mostly, conceptual analysis, explication of implicit claims, examination of the consistency of claims, assessment of the relevance of methods or models. More rarely, but very interestingly, they also make positive and original contributions by bridging domains of science or suggesting hypotheses.
This different context – in particular, the specific requirements for a publication in a peer-reviewed science journal – transforms philosophy of science. Is it still philosophy? What is the difference with approaches such as "philosophy of science in practice", "complementary science", "scientific philosophy", "theory of science", and naturalism? PinS faces a double "impostor syndrome": not entirely philosophical for philosophers, and not entirely scientific for scientists. In conclusion, we will explore how PinS can respond to this double challenge.
Women's Standpoints on Nature: What Makes Them Possible?
Sandra Harding
Osiris, Vol. 12, Women, Gender, and Science: New Directions (1997), pp. 186-200 (
Consumer Culture Theory and Tattoo: Ink Subculture or Mass Consumer Practice?Federica Palumbo
Research Poster presented at Consumer Culture Theory Conference "Mapping Consumer Culture. Latitudes, Legends and Declination". June 26-29, Helsinki, Finland.
Rajeev Ahuja is a professor at Uppsala University in Sweden. He received his M.Sc. in Physics in 1991 and his doctoral degree in Solid State Physics in 1991. He has held various academic positions including visiting professorships. He has supervised over 60 doctoral students and 30 postdoctoral researchers. He has published over 845 publications in international journals including high-impact journals like Nature, Science, and Physical Review Letters. He has received several prestigious awards and honors for his research contributions.
This document summarizes research being conducted at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario. It features three young researchers at the Queen's Cancer Research Institute who are approaching cancer research in different but interconnected ways. It also profiles several other Queen's researchers studying topics like Renaissance imagery, international criminal law, and risk analysis. The document emphasizes that younger generations of scholars are leading innovation in fields like digital scholarship and data-driven research.
This document provides an overview of the conceptual framework and course for a biodiversity conservation class. It discusses key messages around biodiversity loss and the need for sustainability education. The conceptual framework will focus on landscape change and habitat fragmentation as threats. It introduces conceptual landscape models from a human and species perspective. The course will include lectures, tutorials, discussion forums, a field trip, and practical sessions. Assessments will include tutorial facilitation, essays, and a research paper following the field trip.
This document provides an introduction from the Dean of the College of Arts & Sciences at the University at Albany. It discusses how the College is the intellectual core of the University and highlights some of the research, scholarship and creative works produced by faculty over the past year. The Dean expresses pride in the breadth and complexity of work across disciplines. Brief summaries are provided of some faculty publications and projects from various departments, including Anthropology, Linguistics, Psychology and others. The goal is to share faculty accomplishments more widely within the University community.
This document summarizes several theories of cognitive and psychological aging from biological, psychological, and social science perspectives.
1. Biological theories propose mechanisms of aging including free radical damage, caloric restriction, genetic damage, hormonal changes, and immune system decline. Stress theories also examine how neuroendocrine reactivity influences aging patterns.
2. Psychological theories include theories of cognition that examine declines in fluid abilities versus maintenance of crystallized abilities. Everyday competence theories analyze how cognition relates to adaptive behavior.
3. Theories have evolved from broad conceptual frameworks to more targeted models informed by empirical research using longitudinal and cohort analysis methods. No single overarching psychological aging theory exists, but major focus areas include cognition, competence
John H. Holland is a professor of computer science and engineering and psychology at the University of Michigan. He received his BS in physics from MIT and his PhD in computer science from the University of Michigan. His research interests include complex adaptive systems, the theory of adaptive systems both natural and artificial, and cognitive processes. He has published extensively in these areas and advised 49 PhD students.
This case study examines a design studio course during the COVID-19 pandemic that aimed to illustrate the intersection between air ventilation and educational inequality. The studio responded in real-time to evidence about the pandemic and proposed retrofitting designs for an existing school. The design process incorporated research elements such as establishing a theoretical foundation on indoor safety guidelines and the history of the fresh air movement in schools. Students developed hypotheses and design proposals, which underwent review. This design simulation process reflected how design can be part of research by generating knowledge through reflection on the designs. The case study demonstrates how research and design inform each other, with design proposals validating or challenging original hypotheses to result in a research thesis.
Similar to List of publications for Matthias Kaiser 18 (20)
1. 1
List of publications for Matthias Kaiser:
In order of type of publication:
Book publications (author or co-author):
Ø Droste-Franke, B., Carrier, M., Kaiser, M., Schreurs, M., Weber, C., Ziesemer, T. (2015).
Improving Energy Decisions – Towards Better Scientific Policy Advice for a Safe
and Secure Future Energy System, Springer: Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht,
London. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-11346-3.
Ø Gethmann, C.F., Carrier, M., Hanekamp, G., Kaiser, M., Kamp, G., Lingner, S., Quante,
M., Thiele, F. (2015). Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity
Claims, Springer: Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London.
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2.
Ø Kaiser, M. (2000), Hva er vitenskap?, Universitetsforlaget: Oslo
Ø Kaiser, M. (1993), Aspekte des wissenschaftlichen Fortschritts, Europäische
Hochschulschriften XX/398, Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt a.M, 1993.
Ø Kaiser, M. (1991), Aspekte des wissenschaftlichen Fortschritts, Inauguraldissertation,
submitted to the Dept. of Philosophy, University of Frankfurt.
Ø Kaiser, M. (1979), Die Bedeutung und Problematik des Theoriebegriffes - Eine
kritische Untersuchung des Theoriebegriffes von J.D.Sneed., mag.art.-thesis,
mimeographed, Dept. of Philosophy, Univ. of Oslo 1979.
Editor of books or journal issues (editor or co-editor):
Ø M. Kaiser & M. E. Lien eds. (2006), Ethics and the Politics of Food, Wageningen
Academic Publishers: Wageningen 2006.
Ø M. Kaiser ed. (2002): Guest editor of a special issue on the Precautionary Principle of the
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, vol 15, no 1, 2002
Ø M. Kaiser ed. (1997): Guest editor of special issue of Foundations of Science on “The
Precautionary Principle and Its Implications for Science”, and author of “Introduction”;
Foundations of Science, 2 (1997).
Ø M. Kaiser & S. Welin, eds. (1995), Ethical Aspects of Modern Biotechnology, Studies
in Research Ethics, no. 5, Göteborg 1995.
Ø M. Kaiser (1991), Guest Editor of a special issue of Synthese: Scientific Knowledge and
Scientific Practice, vol.89, no. 1, (october 1991);
Ø M.Kaiser (1989), editor of a "kompendium" for students: Feministisk etikk - et utvalg av
innledende tekster, ("Feminist Ethics – A Selection of Introductory Texts"),
mimeographed, Dept. of philosophy, Univ. of Oslo 1989.
Articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals:
Ø Haugen, A.S., Bremer, S., Kaiser, M. (2017): “Weaknesses in the ethical framework of
aquaculture related standards”, Marine Policy Volume 75, January 2017, Pages 11-18.
(online October 2016): http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.10.011
2. 2
Ø Kaiser, M. & Algers, A. (2016). “Food ethics: a wide field in need of Dialogue”
(Editorial), Food Ethics, vol 1 (1), pp. 1-7.
Ø Bremer, S., M. M. Haque, A. S. Haugen, and M. Kaiser. (2016). “Inclusive governance
of aquaculture value-chains: Co-producing sustainability standards for Bangladeshi
shrimp and prawns.” Ocean and Coastal Management, 131:13-24.
Ø Bremer, S., Millar, K., Wright, N., Kaiser, M. (2015). “Responsible techno-innovation in
aquaculture: Employing ethical engagement to explore attitudes to GM salmon in
Northern Europe”, Aquaculture, 437, 370 – 381.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.12.031
Ø Kaiser M, (2014), “The integrity of science – Lost in translation?”, Best Practice &
Research Clinical Gastroenterology; Volume 28 , Issue 2 , 339 – 347;
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2014.03.003
Ø Blanchard, A., Hauge, K.H., Andersen, G., Fosså, J.H., Grøsvik,, B.E., Handegard, N.O.,
Kaiser, M., Meier, S., Olsen, E., Vikebø, F. (2014): “Harmful routines? Uncertainty in
science and conflicting views on routine petroleum operations in Norway”, Marine
Policy, vol. 43, 313-320.
Ø Kaiser, M. (2012), “Commentary: Looking for conflict and finding none?”, in Public
Understanding of Science, vol 21(2) 188-194. [DOI:10.1177/0963662511434433]
Ø Ole Torrissen; Kevin Alan Glover; Tore Haug; Ole Arve Misund; Hans Julius Skaug;
Matthias Kaiser (2012). “Good ethics or political and cultural censoring in science?”
2012; ICES Journal for Marine Sciences, March 6, 2012; doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fss016
Ø König, A., Kuiper, H.A., Marvin, H.J.P., Boon, P.E., Busk, L., Cnudde, F., Cope, S.,
Davies, H.V., Dreyer, M., Frewer, L.J., Kaiser, M., Kleter, G.A., Knudsen, I., Pascal, G.,
Prandini, A., Renn, O., Smith, M.R., Traill, B.W., Voet, H.v.d., Trijp, H.v., Vos, E.,
Wentholt, M.T.A. (2010) “The SAFE FOODS framework for improved risk analysis of
foods”. Food Control, 21(12), 1566-1587. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.02.012
Ø Y. Devos, M. Demont, K. Dillen, D. Reheul, M. Kaiser, O. Sanvido (2008),
“Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union.
A review”, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, available online at:
www.agronomy-journal.org
Ø M. P. Krayer von Krauss, M. Kaiser, V. Almaas, J. van der Sluijs, P. Kloprogge (2008),
”Diagnosing and prioritizing uncertainties according to their relevance for policy: The
case of transgene silencing”, Science of the Total Environment 390, 23 – 34.
Ø M. Kaiser, K. Millar, E. Thorstensen & S. Tomkins (2007), "Developing the ethical
matrix as a decision support framework: GM fish as a case study", Journal of
Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, vol.20, 65-80.
Ø K. Millar, E. Thorstensen, S. Tomkins, B. Mepham & M.Kaiser (2007), “Developing the
Ethical Delphi”, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, vol. 20, 53-63.
Ø Sluijs, J.P. van der; M. Kaiser; L. Maxim; J. Douguet (2007), “Le principe de
precaution, un principe pour agir dans des situations d'incertitude”, Risques, 72, pp. 75-
81.
Ø Sluijs, J.P. van der; M. Kaiser (2006), “Towards a Common Understanding of the
Precautionary Principle”, Epidemiology, vol 17 (6), 121.
3. 3
Ø M. Kaiser (2005), “Assessing ethics and animal welfare in animal biotechnology for
farm production”, OiE, Scientific and Technical Review of the World Organisation for
Animal Health (Rev.sci.tech.Off.int.Epiz.) 2005, vol. 24 (1), 75-87.
Ø Oughton, D., Forsberg, E.-M., Bay, I., Kaiser, M. & Howard, B. (2004). “An ethical
dimension to sustainable restoration and long-term management of contaminated areas”,
in: Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, Vol. 74, Issues 1-3: 171-183, Elsevier.
Ø M. Kaiser & Selina M. Stead (2002), ”Uncertainties and values in European aquaculture:
communication, management and policy issues in times of ’changing public
perceptions’”, Aquaculture International vol 10 (2002), p. 469-490.
Ø M. Kaiser & E.-M. Forsberg (2002), “Consensus conference on environmental values in
radiation protection: a report on building consensus among experts”, Science and
Engineering Ethics, vol. 8, (4): 593-602.
Ø M. Kaiser & E.-M. Forsberg (2001), “Assessing Fisheries – Using an Ethical Matrix in a
Participatory Process.”, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14: 191-200.
Ø ICSU's Standing Committee on Responsibility and Ethics in Science (2000) “Ethics and
the Responsibility of Science”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 6 (2000), 131-142.
[Kaiser was chair of the Committee].
Ø M. Kaiser (1999), “Development of International Guidelines for Research Ethics
(Commentary on Mishkin)”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 5 (1999), 293-298.
Ø M. Kaiser (1997), “Fish-Farming and the Precautionary Principle: Context and Values in
Environmental Science for Policy”, Foundations of Science, 2 (1997), 307-341.
Ø M. Kaiser (1996), "Towards More Secrecy in Science? - Comments on Some Structural
Changes in Science and Their Implications for an Ethics of Science", Perspectives on
Science, vol.4, no. 2, 207-230.
Ø M. Kaiser (1994), "Normativ vitenskapsteori og føre-var-prinsippet - En kommentar til
Knut Erik Tranøys vitenskapsfilosofi" ("Normative philosophy of science and the
Precautionary Principle - a comment on the philosophy of science of Knut Erik
Tranøy"), Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift, vol. 29, nr. 3 / 4 (1994), 209-222
Ø M. Kaiser (1993), "Philosophers Adrift - Comments on the Alleged Disunity of
Method", Philosophy of Science 60 (1993), 500-512.
Ø M. Kaiser (1991), "Progress and Rationality: Laudan's Attempt to Divorce a Happy
Couple", Inquiry, 34 (1991), 433-455.
Ø M. Kaiser (1991), "From Rocks to Graphs - The Shaping of Phenomena", Synthese, 89
(1991):111-133 .
Ø M. Kaiser (1990), "Vitenskapsfilosofi - på feministiske avveier?" (Philosophy of science
– on a feminist detour?"), Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift, 25 (1990), 217-239.
Ø M. Kaiser (1988), "Ein kritischer Kommentar zu H.Bernhard: Was bedeutet Poppers
Drei-Welten-Lehre?", Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol.42, 1 (1988).
Ø M. Kaiser (1987), "Vitenskapelighet og kvinnelighet", (i.e."Femininity and the Ethos of
Science") Sosiologi i dag, 2/1987.
Articles in book anthologies and proceedings:
4. 4
Ø Kaiser, M. (2016), “Method in practical ethics: a call for a paradigm change”, in:
I.A.S.Olsson, S.M.Araújo, M.F.Vieira: Food Futures Ethics, Science & Culture;
Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen; pp.142-147.
Ø Bremer, S. & Kaiser,M. (2016), “Sustainable aquaculture governance: challenges to
participatory standard setting”, in: I.A.S.Olsson, S.M.Araújo, M.F.Vieira: Food Futures
Ethics, Science & Culture; Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen; 133-138.
Ø Bremer, S., & Blanchard, A., & Kaiser, M. (2015), “Challenges to Evaluating Coastal
Management in the Twenty-First Century: Lessons from the Lofoten Archipelago”, in:
Baztan, J., Chouinard, O., Jorgensen, B., Tett, P., Vanderlinden, J.P., Vasseur, L. (eds.):
Coastal Zones: Solutions for the 21st
Century, Elsevier Inc, Amsterdam, pp.: 253 – 272;
ISBN: 978-0-12-802748-6.
Ø Kaiser, M. (2015), “Ethics of Science and a New Social Contract for Knowledge”, in: S.
Meisch, J. Lundershausen, L. Bossert, & M. Rockoff (eds.): Ethics of Science in the
Research for Sustainable Development, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft: Baden-Baden; ISBN:
978-3-8487-1835-1; pp: 153-177.
Ø Kaiser, M. (2015), “Werte, Werturteile, und post-normale Wissenschaft”, in: Regina
Ammicht Quinn & Thomas Potthast (Hrsg.): Ethik in den Wissenschaften, Internationales
Zentrum für Ethik in den Wissenschaften (IZEW), Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen,
ISBN 978-3-935933-1-7; pp: 367-374.
Ø Kaiser, M. (2015), “Aquaculture and the precautionary principle in the New Zealand
Supreme Court” in: D.E.Dumitras, I.M.Jitea, S.Aerts (eds.), Know your food - Food ethics
and innovation, Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen.
Ø Kaiser, M. (2015), “Preface”. in: D.E.Dumitras, I.M.Jitea, S.Aerts (eds.), Know your food
- Food ethics and innovation, Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen.
Ø Kaiser, M. (2014), entries on: “Norwegian perspectives” and “International Council for
Science”, in: Encyclopedia on Ethics, Science, Technology and Engineering, 2nd
edition, 4
volumes, Editor: Mitcham, Carl, Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.
Ø Bremer, S., Johansen, J., Øyen, S., Kaiser, M., Haugen, A.S. (2014), “Mapping the ethical
terrain of Chinese aquaculture”, in: C. Brautaset & C.M. Dent (eds.), The Great Diversity:
Trajectories of Asian Development, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen.
Ø Kaiser, M. (2013), “Ciencia y politica: una pareja sin romance”, in: Carlos López Beltrán
& Ambrosio Velasco Gómez (eds.), Aproximaciones a la filosofia politica de la ciencia,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico.
Ø Kaiser, M. (2013), “Precaution or prudent vigilance as guiding the path to global food
security?”, in: H. Röcklinsberg & P. Sandin (eds.), The ethics of consumption: The
citizen, the market and the law, Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen.
Ø Bremer, S., Haugen, A.S. & Kaiser,M. (2013), “Whose sustainability counts? Engaging
with debates on the sustainability of Bangladeshi shrimp”, ?”, in: H. Röcklinsberg & P.
Sandin (eds.), The ethics of consumption: The citizen, the market and the law,
Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen.
Ø Kaiser, M. (2012), “Why German consumers need to reconsider their preferences: the
ethical argument for aquaculture”, in: T. Potthast & S. Meisch, Climate change and
sustainable development - Ethical perspectives on land use and food production.
Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen. pp. 321-325.
5. 5
Ø Kaiser, M. & Potthast, T. (2012), “Preface”, in: T. Potthast & S. Meisch, Climate change
and sustainable development - Ethical perspectives on land use and food production.
Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen. pp. 17-19.
Ø Bremer, S, Haugen, A.S., & Kaiser, M. (2012), “Mapping core values and ethical
principles for livelihoods in Asia, in: T. Potthast & S. Meisch, Climate change and
sustainable development - Ethical perspectives on land use and food production.
Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen. pp. 419-424.
Ø Kaiser, M. (2012), “Dilemmas for Ethical Guidelines for the Sciences”, in: Promoting
Research Integrity in a Global Environment, Tony Mayer & Nicholas Steneck (eds.);
World Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore.
Ø Kaiser, M. (2012), “The ethics and sustainability of aquaculture”, in: The Philosophy of
Food, Arthur Kaplan (ed.), University of California Press: Berkeley, Los Angeles,
London.
Ø M. Kaiser (2010). “Designing ethical strategies for global food security”, in: C.M.Romeo
Casabona & L.E.San Epifanio & A. E. Cirion (eds.), Global Food Security: Ethical and
Legal Challenges, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen.
Ø A.S. Haugen, M. Kaiser, V. Almaas (2010), „Certification and ethical standards in
aquaculture“,in: C.M.Romeo Casabona & L.E.San Epifanio & A. E. Cirion (eds.), Global
Food Security: Ethical and Legal Challenges, Wageningen Academic Publishers,
Wageningen.
Ø V. Almaas & M. Kaiser (2010), “Governance addressing societal values”, in: C.M.Romeo
Casabona & L.E.San Epifanio & A. E. Cirion (eds.), Global Food Security: Ethical and
Legal Challenges, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen.
Ø A. Algers, M. Kaiser, C. Kallum, H.Loor, K. Wahlgreen & S. Welin (2010), „Food ethics
dilemma: an open learning resource for teaching ethics“,in: C.M.Romeo Casabona &
L.E.San Epifanio & A. E. Cirion (eds.), Global Food Security: Ethical and Legal
Challenges, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen.
Ø M. Kaiser & C.: Romeo-Casabona (2010), “Preface”, in: C.M.Romeo Casabona &
L.E.San Epifanio & A. E. Cirion (eds.), Global Food Security: Ethical and Legal
Challenges, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen.
Ø M. Kaiser (2009), “Ethical aspects of livestock genetic engineering”, in: M. Engelhard, K.
Hagen, M. Boysen (eds.), Genetic Engineering in Livestock – New Applications and
Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg.
Ø M. Kaiser (2009), “ Defining the Precautionary Principle; Uncertainties and Values in
Science for Policy”, in: J.H. Solbakk, P. Nortvedt & A. Nome (eds.), Contemporary Issues
in Medical Ethics, Volume 1, Section for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo.
Ø J. van der Sluijs et M. Kaiser (2008), “Vers une compréhension commune du principe de
précaution”. In P. Allard, D. Fox and B. Picon, Incertitude et environnement, La fin des
certitudes scientifiques, EDISUD.
Ø M. Kaiser (2007), “Coexistence and ethics: NIMBY-arguments reconsidered”, in: W.
Zollitsch, C. Winckler, S. Waiblinger, A. Haslberger (eds.), Sustainable food production
and ethics, Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen 2007.
Ø M. Kaiser (2006), "Defining the Precautionary Principle: Uncertainty and Values in
Science for Policy" , in Jahrbuch der Altonaer Stiftung for philosophische
Grundlagenforschung, 1. Jahrgang, Der andere Verlag: Lübeck und Marburg 2006.
6. 6
Ø M. Kaiser (2006), "Turning cheap fish into expensive fish? The ethical examination of an
argument about feed conversion rates", in: M. Kaiser & M.E. Lien (eds.), Ethics and the
Politics of Food, Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen 2006.
Ø E. Thorstensen & M. Kaiser (2006), "The ethical Delphi. A new tool for ethical
assessments", in: M. Kaiser & M.E. Lien (eds.), Ethics and the Politics of Food,
Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen 2006.
Ø M. Kaiser (2006), “Practical ethics in search of a toolbox: Ethics of science and
technology at the crossroads“, in Gunning, Jennifer and Søren Holm (ed.) 2006: Ethics,
Law and Society Vol.II, Ashgate Publishing Ltd: Cardiff, pp. 35-44.
Ø M. Kaiser (2005), “Socrates and a Sophist among architects”, in: Building a doctoral
programme in architecture and design, Appreciations from colleagues and friends of
Halina Dunin-Woyseth’s contributions on the occasion of her 60th
birthday, Eds.: Jan
Michl & Liv Merete Nielsen, Research magazine no 7, Oslo School of Architecture: Oslo
2005, 24 – 30.
Ø M. Kaiser (2005), “Practical ethics in search of a toolbox: Discourse ethics and ethical
committees”, in: L. Landeweerd, L.-M. Houdebine & R. Termeulen (eds.), Bio
Technology-Ethics – An introduction. Angelo Pontecorboli Editore: Firenze, 2005.
Ø M. Kaiser (2005), " Uncertainty and Precaution 2: The Precautionary Principle and its
relevance to science” in: L. Landeweerd, L.-M. Houdebine & R. Termeulen (eds.), Bio
Technology-Ethics – An introduction. Angelo Pontecorboli Editore: Firenze, 2005.
Ø M. Kaiser (2005), "Uncertainty and Precaution 1: Certainty and uncertainty in science" in:
L. Landeweerd, L.-M. Houdebine & R. Termeulen (eds.), Bio Technology-Ethics – An
introduction. Angelo Pontecorboli Editore: Firenze, 2005.
Ø M. Kaiser (2005), Chapter on “International Council of Science”, in: Encyclopedia of
Science, Technology, and Ethics. Editor: Mitcham, Carl., Detroit: Macmillan Reference
USA.
Ø M. Kaiser (2004), “Ethical issues surrounding the gm-animals / gm-fish production”, in:
Science, Ethics & Society: Preprints of the 5th congress of the European Society for
Agricultural and Food Ethics 2004, Johan De Tavernier & Stefan Aerts (eds.), Centre for
Agricultural Bio- and Environmental Ethics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
Ø M. Kaiser (2004), ”Xenotransplantation – Ethical Considerations based on Human and
Societal Perspectives”, in: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, Proceedings of the 16th
Internordic Symposium of the Nordic Committee for Veterinary Scientific Cooperation on
Animal Organs to Save Human Lives, W. Farstad & Ø. Andresen & O. Nyberg & B.
Christensen (eds.), Suppl. 99, 65 – 73.
Ø M. Kaiser (2004), “Et liv med risiko – klarer vi de etiske utfordringene?”, i Stian
Lydersen (ed.), Fra flis i fingeren til ragnarok – Tjue historier om sikkerhet, tapir
akademisk forlag: Trondheim.
Ø M. Kaiser (2003), ”På sporet av den tapte maten”, i: Den politiserte maten, Eivind
Jacobsen, Reidar Almås, & Jahn Petter Johnsen (eds.), abstrakt forlag: Oslo 2003.
Ø M. Kaiser (2003), “Forskningsetikk i Norge – Norge viser veien?”, i: Forskningsetikk,
Knut Ruyter (ed.), Gyldendal Forlag: Oslo, 2003.
Ø M. Kaiser (2003), “Ethics, science, and precaution – A viewpoint from Norway”, in:
Precaution, Environmental Science, and Preventive Public Policy, Joel Tickner (ed.),
Island Press: Washington DC.
7. 7
Ø Oughton, D., Bay, I., Forsberg, E.M., Kaiser, M.: Value Judgements and Trade-Offs in
Management of Nuclear Accidents: Using an Ethical Matrix in Practical Decision-
Making. In: VALues in Decisions on Risk. Stockholm (2003)
Ø Howard, B.J., Forsberg, E-M., Kaiser M. & Oughton D. (2002): "An Ethical Dimension
To Sustainable Restoration And Long-Term Management Of Contaminated Areas." In:
International Conference On Radioactivity In The Environment, pp 506-510, Monaco
Ø M. Kaiser (2002), “Social Perceptions and Ethics in Aquaculture: Aquaculture as a
Responsible Supplier for the New Millennium”, in: Perspectives on Responsible
Aquaculture for the New Millennium, R. LeRoy, Creswell & Rosa Flos (eds.),
Publication of the World Aquaculture Society Baton Rouge, LA USA and the European
Aquaculture Society. Oostende, Belgium; EAS Publication Pub-162, 2002.
Ø M. Kaiser (2002), “Ethics of science now maturing: experiences so far and outlooks
ahead”, in: Forschungsfreiheit und ihre ethischen Grenzen, Kurt Pawlik & Dorothea Frede
(eds.), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: Göttingen 2002.
Ø M. Kaiser & Forsberg, E-M. (2000): "Self-reflexive ethical advice for fisheries:
methodological reflections on ethical matrixes and participatory process." Preprints to the
2nd European Congress on Agricultural and Food Ethics. Available on
www.husdyr.kvl.dk/htm/psa/eursafe.htm.
Ø M. Kaiser (2000), “Fish Farming and Biotechnology: Ethical Considerations for Future
Applications”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Ethical Issues Arising from
the Application of Biotechnology, volume II, organised by the Council of Europe, Oviedo,
Spain (16-19 May, 1999) Council of Europe Publications 2000.
Ø M. Kaiser (2000), “Thematic meeting report on session: Science, Ethics and
Responsibility”, in: World Conference on Science – Science for the Twenty-First Century
– A New Commitment, UNESCO publications; Paris.
Ø M. Kaiser (2000), “Diskurs oder Konfrontation in Fragen der Gentechnik?“ , i: A. Spök &
K. Hartmann (eds.) GENug gestritten? Gentechnik zwischen Risikodiskussion und
gesellschaftlicher Herausforderung, Graz: Leykam.
Ø M. Kaiser (2000), “Ethics and the Responsibility of Science”, in: M.Balaban &
H.P.Sambuc (eds.), Effects of Global Business on Scientific Research, Science and
Consciences of Man Foundation: Geneve
Ø M. Kaiser (1998), “The Problem of Risk – A Social Approach” (in Russian), in: Samuel
Kugel (ed.) The Problems of Scientists and Scientific Group Activity, vol. XII,
St.Petersburg State Technical University: St.Petersburg 1998.
Ø M. Kaiser (1997), “Principle of Carefulness in Science and Economy” (in Russian), in
Proceedings from The St.Petersburg School of Science and Technics Sociology, volume
XI, St.Petersburg 1997.
Ø M. Kaiser (1997), "Unpopular and Precautionary Science: Towards a New Ethics of
Science", in: M.L.Dalla Chiara et al. (eds.), Structures and Norms in Science, Kluwer:
Dordrecht 1997, 189-206.
Ø Elgesem, D., Kaiser, M. & Solbakk, J.H. (1997): “Forskningens etiske dilemmaer”, (“The
ethical dilemmas in research”) in: Ø. Såtvedt (ed.) Forskning mellom teknologi og kultur,
NKSF, Oslo 1997.
8. 8
Ø M. Kaiser (1996), "Empirical versus Theoretical Progress in Science", in: R.S.Cohen,
R.Hilpinen and Qui Renzong (eds.), Realism and Anti-Realism in the Philosophy of
Science, 171-193, Kluwer: Dordrecht 1996.
Ø M. Kaiser (1995), "The Independence of Scientific Phenomena", in: Theories and Models
in Scientific Processes, eds.: William Herfel et al., 179-200, Amsterdam - Atlanta 1995
Ø M. Kaiser (1994), "Technology Assessment and Democratic Decisionmaking", in:
Proceedings of IATAFI 94, The 1st International Conference for Technology Assessment
and Forecasting Institutions, Bergen, Norway, 2-6 May 1994, Bergen.
Project reports:
Ø Co-author of Global Governance of Science, 2009, Report of the Expert Group, by
Ozolina, Z., Mitcham, C., Stilgo, J., Andanda, P., Kaiser, M., Nielsen, L., Stehr, N., &
Qiu, R.-Z.; DG Research EUR 23616 EN.; available at:
http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/global-governance-
020609_en.pdf (20.09.2014)
Ø Co-author of Ethical Bio-Technology Assessment Tools for Agriculture and Food
Production 2006 (Final Report Ethical Bio-TA Tools – QLG6-CT-2002-02594), LEI:
The Hague
Ø B.Mepham, M.Kaiser, E.Thorstensen, S.Tomkins, K.Millar (2006): Ethical Matrix –
Manual, LEI: The Hague
Ø K.Millar, S.Tomkins, E.Thorstensen, B.Mepham, M.Kaiser (2006): Ethical Delphi –
Manual, LEI: The Hague.
Ø UNESCO / COMEST (2005), The Precautionary Principle, A report of an ad hoc
working group, endorsed by COMEST /UNESCO April 2005 (members of the expert
group: M. Kaiser (chair), J.v.d. Sluijs (rapporteur), S. Beder, V. Hösle, A. Kemelmajer de
Calucci, A. Kinzig; UNESCO secretariat: H. t. Have, S. Scholze, E. Kuok), UNESCO:
Paris; also available on: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001395/139578e.pdf
Ø Kaiser, M., Millar, K., Forsberg, E.-M., Baune, O., Mepham, B., Thorstensen, E.,
Tomkins, S.: Decision-Making Frameworks. In: Beekman, V. (ed.) Evaluation of Ethical
Biotechnology Assessment Tools for Agriculture and Food Production: Interim Report
Ethical Bio-TA Tools, Agricultural Economics Research Institute, The Hague (2004)
Ø M. Kaiser (2003), “Ethical issues surrounding the gm-animals / gm-fish production” ,
Expert paper for the FAO / WHO Expert Consultation on Safety Assessment of Foods
Derived from Genetically Modified Animals including Fish (2003); published by FAO on
the internet at: http://www.fao.org/es/esn/food/risk_biotech_animal_en.stm
Ø Co-author (expert) of FAO / WHO Report: Expert Consultation on Safety Assessment of
Foods Derived from Genetically Modified Animals including Fish (2003), FAO Rome
2004; see also ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/006/y5316E/y5316E00.pdf
Ø M. Kaiser, K. Rønning, K. W. Ruyter, H.W. Nagell & M.E.Grung: Oppdragsforskning –
åpenhet, kvalitet, etterrettelighet; De nasjonale forskningsetiske komiteer 2003.
Ø Oughton, D.H., Bay, I. Forsberg, E.-M., Hunt, J. Kaiser, M. & Littlewood, D. (2003),
Social and ethical aspects of countermeasure evaluation and selection – using an
ethical matrix in participatory decision making, Deliverable 4 of the STRATEGY
project, EC Contract No: FIKR-CT-2000-00018, Agricultural University of Norway,
February 2003.
9. 9
Ø (co-authored with SCRES): “Standards for Ethics and Responsibility in Science – An
Empirical Study”, presented at ICSU GA in Rio De Janeiro September 2002, and
published on the ICSU website: www.icsu.org .
Ø E.-M. Forsberg & M. Kaiser, Strategier og verdier i norske fiskerier mot år 2020 (i.e.
Strategies and values in Norwegian fisheries towards 2020, final project report), De
nasjonale forskningsetiske komiteer, november 2000.
Ø M. Kaiser & Forsberg, E.-M. (1999), “En verdivurdering av norske fiskerier”
(prosjektrapport), NENT-arbeidsnotat 1999
Ø M. Kaiser / NENT (1997): Føre-var prinsippet - Mellom forskning og politikk, (“The
Precautionary Principle: between research and politics”), NENT publication nr. 11, 207
pages .
Ø Elgesem, D., Jåsund, K. & Kaiser, M. (1997): Fusk i forskning: Uredelig og diskutabel
forskningspraksis i Norge" (An empirical study of scientific misconduct and problematic
research practices in Norway), published by The National Committees for Research Ethics
in Norway
Ø M. Kaiser / NENT (1993), (author of a report published under the auspices of The
National Committee for Research Ethics in Science and Technology:) Oppdrettslaks -
en studie i norsk teknologiutvikling, ("Cultured atlantic salmon - a study of Norwegian
technology development"), NENT publikasjon nr. 5, Oslo 1993.
Ø M. Kaiser (1993), "Bruk av genetisk modifiserte organismer og moralsk aksept" ("The use
of genetically modified organisms and moral accept"), Nordiske Seminar- og
Arbejdsrapporter 1993:604, The Nordic Council of Ministers, 62-67.
Ø M. Kaiser (1992), Editor of Forskningsetikk for forskningsråd ("Research Ethics for
Research Councils"), including a contribution "Sentrale forskningsetiske prinsipper - og
noen kommentarer til moderne genteknologi" ("Main principles in research ethics - and
some added comments on modern biotechnology"), NENT-publikasjon nr. 2, Oslo.
Ø M. Kaiser (1992), Editor of Forskningsetisk veileder, (A Guidebook in Research Ethics)
NENT-publikasjon nr.3.
Ø M. Kaiser (1991), "Kvalitets-normer", ("Quality-norms") i Rapport fra et prosjektseminar
"Hva er kvalitet?", TMVs prosjektnotat 91/1, 1991
Ø M. Kaiser (1989), "Mellom viten og visjon - En kommentar til Tor Selstad: Mellom
höyteknologi og dypökologi" ("Between knowledge and vision - A comment on Tor
Selstad: Between high-technology and deep-ecology"), an evaluation commissioned by
the Scientific Board of Alternativ Framtid ("Alternative futures"), a research programme
of the Norwegian Government.
Articles in other scientific journals / publications:
Ø M. Kaiser (2007), “Scientific Dishonesty and Research Ethics in Norway”, in: Annual
Report 2006: The Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty, Danish Agency for
Science, Technology and Innovation, Copenhagen, p. 18-21
Ø M. Kaiser (2005), “A response to the ethical use of GMOs”, in: COMEST Fourth
Session, 23-25 March 2005, Bangkok, Thailand, Proceedings; UNESCO: Paris 2005; pp
125-128; [also in a French version];
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001405/140565e.pdf
10. 10
Ø M. Kaiser (2004), 3 contributions : 1) “Uncertainty and Precaution 1: Certainty and
uncertainty in science”, 2) “Uncertainty and Precaution 2: The Precautionary Principle
and its relevance to science” , 3) “Practical ethics in search of a toolbox: Discourse ethics
and ethical committees”; Global Bioethics, vol. 17, 2004
Ø M. Kaiser (1999), “Science and Politics: Bedfellows Without Romance”, Bridges, vol 6 1
/ 2 (1999), 87-104.
Ø M. Kaiser (1993), "Frankenstein på dagsorden", ("Frankenstein revisited") review of a
text-book for studies in Science, Technology, and Society: Frankensteins dilemma, by
H.With Andersen & K.Sørensen, Dragen, Febr./March 1993
Ø M. Kaiser (1993), "Some Thoughts on the Responsibility of Scientists in Relation to the
Growth of Fish-Farming in Norway", Studies in Research Ethics, nr.2: Scientific
Responsibility and Public Control, Göteborg.
Ø M. Kaiser (1991), "Filosofiske perspektiver på medisinsk teknologivurdering",
("Philosophical perspectives on medical technology assessment") Omsorg nr.2
Ø M. Kaiser (1990), "Rationality, Reason, and the Sociology og Knowledge", Synthesis
Philosophica, 9 (1/1990), 323-338.
Ø M. Kaiser (1990), "Racionalost, razlozi i sociologija spoznaje", Filozofskim
Istrazivanjima, 34 (1/1990), 195-207.
Ø M. Kaiser (1989), "Some aspects of scientific progress", Acta Analytica, 4/1989.
Ø M. Kaiser (1986), "Rapport om Seminaret i vitenskapsteori ved UiO", (i.e. "Report on
science studies at the Univ. of Oslo"), Nytt om kvinneforskning, nr. 1, 1986.
Ø M. Kaiser (1986), "Feministisk filosofi på vei inn i filosofifaget?", (i.e. "Feminist
philosophy into the philosophy curriculum?"), Nytt om kvinneforskning, nr. 1, 1986.
Popular articles and interviews in newspapers/journals (incomplete):
Ø Interview: “Fra Bergen for å lære tyskere dannelse” I VG, 10 July 2014.
Ø Interview: “Tilsettingssak tok 1,5 år – sendes tilbake til start” I På Høyden, 2 July 2014.
Ø Interview: “European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics» in International
Innovation, EuroFocus, February 2012, pp52-53.
Ø Interview: ”Mange stipendiater synes det er greit å jukse”, (e24.no) NTB kl 09:32,
26.05.2013.
Ø Interview: «Nano: den nye etiske bomben», i Ukeavisen ledelse, fredag 6. januar 2012.
Ø Article: “Aquaculture: the hard road to sustainable food production”, in: Europäische
Akademie, Newsletter 110, September 2011, pp. 1-2.
Ø Interview: «Professor Matthias Kaiser, President, European Society for Agricultural and
Food Ethics» in: Research media Ltd. August 27, 2011.
Ø Interview: “Global matvaresikkerhet i perspektiv”, i forskning.no , 25. april 2011.
Ø Interview: «Betaler stiv pris for usikker reklame», Universitetsavisa.no , 21.10.2010. /
Also in: På Høyden, 21.10.2011.
Ø “Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities”, in: PS Public Service Review,
European Science & Technology issue 11, pp. 174-175.
11. 11
Ø Interview in Aftenposten, Nyheter, 6. desember 2010, side 7, ”Det virker som om en del i
forvaltningen tror det er legitimt å jenke litt på resultatene”
Ø (with H. Ingjerd and J. Hølen), “Kunnskap på anbud”, Debatt, Aftenposten, 2. desember
2010
Ø Interview: «Mannen som ikke vil ha makt», i Forskningsetikk, 15. mars 2010.
Ø Chronicle ”Genmodifisert laks er på vei til butikken” i forskning.no, 29. september 2010
Ø Interview in Dagsavisen: ”Oppfordrer til kjøttfri dag” 25. januar 2010.
Ø «Forskningens etiske ansvar» i Forskningsetikk, 04.11.2009
Ø Interview: «Trodde vi var ferdige med slikt», i Nationen, Landbruk, 29.09.2009
Ø (with J.H.Solbakk) ”Politisk styring av forskningsetikken?”, contribution in
Morgenbladet, 12.12.2008
Ø Bokomtale/review: «FLU – The Story of the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918 and the
Search for the Virus That Caused It” by Gina Kolata; in Forskningsetikk, 11.02.2008
Ø “Ubegrunnet om genmodifisering” contribution in Aftenposten, 6.2.2008.
Ø Interview: «Alzheimer griser kan løse gåten», i VG, 29.08.2007
Ø “Forskere for fred” Interview in Morgenbladet, 28.09.2007
Ø ”Klønete håndtert” Interview (on misconduct case) in VG, 28.09.2006.
Ø ”Forskerfusk på Ås”, Interview in God morgen Norge, TV2, 26.09.2006.
Ø Interview in ”Dragkamp om forskningsavtaler”, Aftenposten 30.04.2006
Ø "Mat på det store lerretet", article in Cinemateket, 26.04.2006
Ø Interview in "Dragkamp om forskningsavtaler", Aftenposten, 30.04.2006
Ø Interview in: "Genteknologisk mat – velsignelse eller forbannelse?" Forskningsetikk, 31.
mars 2006
Ø "Etikk i maten" i Forskningsetikk, 31. mars 2006
Ø "Fusk kan og må forebygges", (med H.W. Nagell), Aftenposten, 19. januar 2006
Ø Interview in "jakt på penger kan utløse forskerjuks", Dagsavisen 19. januar 2006
Ø "Leve av, leve med, leve for? Vår bioteknologiske fremtid", Forskningsetikk, 19.
desember 2005
Ø "Romferd, raketter og etisk ansvar" in Forskningsetikk, nr 2 2005
Ø Interview in: "Sirkus Lomborg fortsetter", Apollon 10. februar 2005
Ø "Uenighet Ja, uredelighet NEI TAKK!", article in forskning.no, 4. February 2003
Ø Interview in "nanoteknologier – muligheter og usikkerheter", Norges forskningsråd –
Teknologi, Naturvitenskap Matematikk, 21. desember 2004
Ø Interview in "Etisk metode – Kan lekfolk bidra i de store avgjørelser – på tvers av land og
kultur?" in Forskningsetikk, nr 4 2004
Ø Interview in: "Lomborg svikter de etiske normene", article in forskning.no, 18. March
2004.
12. 12
Ø Interview in "Åpenhet rundt forskningsresultater?", article in forskning.no, 15. January
2004.
Ø Interview in "Hovor åpen skal være man om forskningsresultater?", På høyden,
10.01.2004.
Ø Interview in: "Forskning = sant?", article in Gemini, nr 5, 2004
Ø Interview in "Forskere ofte i konflikt med oppdragsgiver", Namdalsavisa, 15. januar 2004
Ø Interview in: "Las decisiones de la ciencia", Página / 12, Buenos Aires,16. desember 2003
Ø Interview in: ”Professor beskyldes for plagiat”, Aftenposten, 25.04.2003.
Ø Interview in: "Når forskningsresultater bestilles på forhånd", article in forskning.no, 19.
Mai 2003
Ø Kronikk i forskning.no: ”Uenighet JA, Uredelighet NEI TAKK!, 04.02.2003
Ø Interview in "Er forskning et snobbeord?", Forskningsetikk, nr 2 2003
Ø Interview in: "Truer verdigrunnlag", Apollon, 01.01. 2003
Ø Interview in: "Vil legge forskning ut på anbud", Article in Aftenposten 06. Mai 2003
Ø Interview in "EU i bresjen for etiske regler", article in forskning.no, 7. June 2002.
Ø Interview in: "Redelig eller juksemaker?", Apollon, 01.01.2003
Ø Interview in: "Forskere føler seg presset", Universitas, 20.11.2002.
Ø Together with Hilde W. Nagell: "Evalueringen av Forskningsrådet overseer moderne
forskningsformidling", in: Forskningsetikk, nr. 1 mai 2002
Ø Interview, cited in: "Die Welt ist zu komplex für Patentlösungen", Article in Hamburger
Abendblatt, 6. November 2001.
Ø Interview in: "Enighetsfakultetet", Universitas, 31.10.2001.
Ø Interview in: "Midt oppi galskapen", Bladet Forskning, nr. 6, 2001.
Ø "Vestbanen ideell for vitenskaps- og teknologimuseum", article in Aftenposten, 15. June
2000.
Ø "Kampen om Teknologirådet", in Aftenposten, 23. november 2000
Ø (med Ragnar Fjelland & Gunnar Skirbekk) "Krigersk om 'vitenskapskrigene'", i
Forskningspolitikk, nr 2, 1999
Ø Matthias Kaiser & Francis Sejersted: "Norge trenger et uavhengig teknologiråd", article in
Aftenposten 27. July 1998.
Ø “Ny teknologi og etikk” interju ved Geir Olav Melingen, in: Genteknologi og havbruk, Et
debatthefte fra Bioteknologinemnda, Bioteknologinemnda Oslo 1998.
Ø (with K. Ruyter) ”Forskeres troverdighet og etikk”, contribution in Morgenbladet,
02.05.1997.
Ø (with D. Elgesem & K. Jåsund) ”Fusk i forskning – ingen bagatell”, Dagbladet 20.06.1997
Ø Interview in ”Når forskere fusker i faget”, Dagbladet, 09.04.1997
Ø Interview in "Fusk i forskning et ansvar for instituttene", i Uniforum 06 / 1997.
Ø Interview in "Når forskere fusker", Apollon, 01. januar 1997
13. 13
Ø "Miljø-østrogene stoffer: er vi føre-var?" ('Environmental estrogen substances: are we
precautionary?'), article in Aftenposten, October 1995.
Ø "No Parliamentary Technology Assessment in Norway - but a lot of Ethics", (together
with Jon Fixdal), EPTA Newsletter, Issue 10 July 1995, 18-20.
Ø "Institusjonalisert teknologivurdering" (together with Jon Fixdal); ("Institutionalized
technology assessment"), Alternativ Framtid 2 / 1995, 32-34.
Ø "Technology Assessment - Who Needs It?", Futurum, March 1994, pp. 3-4
Ø "Vellykket konferanse i vitenskapsfilosofi", (together with Olav Gjelsvik), in Uniforum,
nr. 18, 1989 (- report on the VIIIth Inter-Nordic Philosophy Symposium -).
Ø "God dag mann økseskaft", (together with Olav Gjelsvik), in Universitas (4.5.88) (-
remarks on the philosophy curriculum in Oslo-)
Ø Critical letter ("Theorien sind sterblich") in bild der wissenschaft, 9-1987, (about an
article on Popper).
Ø Critical letter ("Gen-Technik") in bild der wissenschaft, 10/1979.
Translations:
Ø 1986: Translation from Norwegian into German of the main part of: D.Böhler,
T.Nordenstam, G.Skirbekk, Die pragmatische Wende, Frankfurt a.M., 1986.
Ø 1986: Translation from Norwegian into German of: D.Føllesdal, L. Walløe, J.Elster,
Rationale Argumentation, Berlin, New York, 1986.
Ø 1984: Translation from German to Norwegian, together with O. Vassend, of Giessener
Beschwerdebogen, (psychosomatic medicine) forfattet ved Prof. Dr. Elmar Brähler,
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig.
Ø 1979: Translation from Norwegian into German of: Dagfinn Føllesdal, "Handlungen, ihre
Gründe und Ursachen", published in Hans Lenk (ed.), Handlungstheorien -
interdisziplinär, 2,II, München 1979.
* * * * * * * * *