SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 18
Download to read offline
Λb lifetime measurement
        with Λb → J/ψ Λ

         Régis Lefèvre, Ahmed Rebai
Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire – IN2P3/ CNRS
   Université Blaise Pascal – Clermont-Ferrand II



                 Outline
                     Motivations
                     MC samples
                     Pre-selection
                     Selection
                     Lifetime Fit
                     Outlook
Motivations
HQE calculations up to O(1/mb4)
 τ(Λb) / τ(B0) = 0.88 ± 0.05
   Calculations up to O(1/mb3)
   were giving around 0.94
 Assuming τ(B0) = 1.530 ± 0.009 ps
 (PDG2008), this leads to the
 prediction: τ(Λb) = 1.346 ± 0.077 ps
 CDF Run II J/ψ Λ Prelim. (March 2007)
   2.0σ higher than prediction
 … and 3.3σ higher than PDG2006
 CDF Run II Λc π Prelim. (July 2008)
 seems to resolve the puzzle
   τ(Λb) = 1.410 ±0.046 ±0.029 ps
   – Compatible with prediction
   … and 2.0σ higher than PDG2006
   … 1.8σ lower than J/ψ Λ measurement
Worth doing another precise measurement in LHCb
 First study done on DC04 by Eric Conte and Stéphane Monteil
   Within Eric’s PhD: final state also used for T-violation studies with Ziad Ajaltouni


   Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009      2
MC Samples: DC06
Signal: Λb → J/ψ (→ μμ) Λ (→ pπ)
 239,621 events - Leq = 592 pb-1 assuming BR(Λb → J/ψ Λ) = 4.7 ⋅ 10-4
Prompt J/ψ background: J/ψ (→ μμ) X
 3,991,942 events - Leq = 1.20 pb-1
J/ψ from B background
 Inclusive b di-muon: at least one B hadron in 400 mrad and two opposite signs
 muons between 10 mrad and 400 mrad
   25,865,679 events – Leq = 3.84 pb-1
 B0 → J/ψ (→ μμ) X
   5,415,440 events - Leq = 51.2 pb-1 with BR(B0 → J/ψ X) = 1.55%
 B+ → J/ψ (→ μμ) X                                                     Note: in PDG2008
   6,034,777 events - Leq = 57.1 pb-1 with BR(B+ → J/ψ X) = 1.76%     BR(B±/B0 → J/ψ X)
 Bs → J/ψ (→ μμ) X                                                    = (1.092 ± 0.032)%
   640,611 events - Leq = 24.3 pb-1 with BR(Bs → J/ψ X) = 1.56%
Fake J/ψ background
 Inclusive b di-muon
   An underestimate checked with inclusive b (at least one B hadron in 400 mrad)
   – 32,109,506 events - Leq = 0.105 pb-1

    Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009    3
Towards pre-selection
  DaVinci v22r0p2
  Loose pre-selection
    J/ψ from Standard Loose Muons
      ADMass(J/ψ) < 100 MeV
    Λ from
      – Standard Loose Protons, Standard Loose Downstream Protons
      – Standard Loose Pions, Standard Loose Downstream Pions
      ADMass(Λ) < 30 MeV
    Λb from J/ψ and Λ
      ADMass(Λb) < 500 MeV
  Running over 30,000 signal events
    Retains 76,210 combinations in 9,364 events
     2,341 matched combinations
      – Acceptance × reconstruction efficiency of 7.8%
        with respect to DecProdCut
        » 1.62% with respect to 4π




Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009   4
Pre-selection (1/4)

  Cut                                                           Matched       Not matched
  Track χ2 Probability (μ+) > 10-6                                 96%           91%
  Track χ2 Probability (μ-) > 10-6                                 97%           92%
  Track χ2 Probability (p) > 10-6                                  94%           82%
  Track χ2 Probability (π) > 10-6                                 84%            55%
  All Track χ2 Probability Cuts                                   74%            37%
  Vertex χ2 Probability (J/ψ) > 10-3                               98%           93%
  Vertex χ2 Probability (Λ) > 10-6                                 95%           68%
  Vertex χ2 Probability (Λb) > 10-6                                96%           41%
  All Vertex χ2 Probability Cuts                                  89%            26%
  IP χ2 (Λb) < 25                                                  98%           58%

         Efficiency on matched and not matched combinations
              in signal sample (applying cuts sequentially)

Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009                 5
Pre-selection (2/4)




Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009   6
Pre-selection (3/4)
  Cut                                                           Matched       Not matched
  ADMass(J/ψ) < 50 MeV                                             97%           96%
  ADMass(Λ) < 10 MeV                                               98%           35%
  All ADMass Cuts                                                 95%            34%
  pT (μ+) > 200 MeV                                               100%          99.7%
  pT (μ-) > 200 MeV                                               100%          99.6%
  pT (p) > 500 MeV                                               99.8%           56%
  pT (π) > 100 MeV                                               98.9%           79%
  All pT Cuts                                                     99%            44%
  All Pre-selection Cuts                                          61%            0.9%

                                              64% on matched combinations
                                               with ADMass(Λb) < 50 MeV

         Efficiency on matched and not matched combinations
              in signal sample (applying cuts sequentially)

Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009                 7
Pre-selection (4/4)




                                                       Fraction of events pre-selected
                                                            Λb → J/ψ Λ : 6.04%
                                                            J/ψ X : 0.660%
                                                            Inclusive b di-muon : 0.0537%
                                                            Bd → J/ψ X : 1.10%
                                                            Bu → J/ψ X : 1.11%
                                                            Bs → J/ψ X : 1.08%
                                                            Inclusive b : 0.00279%

Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009                 8
Selection (1/4)
Cut                                          Signal        Prompt J/ψ J/ψ from B       Fake J/ψ
t(Λ)>0                                       99.3%              53%             47%     51%
t(Λ)/σt(Λ)>5                                   92%              21%             17%     12%
p track type = π track type                    91%              72%             69%      73%
pT(μ+)+pT(μ-) > 2 GeV                        99.9%             99.6%            100%     96%
DMass(J/Ψ) ∈ ]-30; 28[ MeV                     97%              95%             95%     56%
ADMass(Λ) < 6                                  97%              86%             79%      76%
IP χ2 (Λb) < 16                                98%              98%             84%      83%
pT(Λ) > 1.6 GeV                               83%               27%             34%     39%
pT(Λb) > 3 GeV                                81%               36%             65%     43%
All Selection Cuts                            67%              9.9%             22%     17%

  On selected signal events one has about 1/4 of
  Long-Long and 3/4 of Downstream-Downstream

          Efficiency on signal [matched & ADMass(Λb) < 50 MeV]
         and background combinations (applying cuts sequentially)
  Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009              9
Selection (2/4)




                                                                       Signal
                                                                       Prompt J/ψ
                                                                       J/ψ from B
                                                                       Fake J/ψ



Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009         10
Selection (3/4)




                                                                       Signal
                                                                       Prompt J/ψ
                                                                       J/ψ from B
                                                                       Fake J/ψ



Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009         11
Selection (4/4)
Lifetime fit cuts
   -1ps < t(Λb) < 10ps
   σt(Λb) < 70fs
   8MeV < σm(Λb) < 20MeV
 Efficiency: 98.5% for signal, 91% to 94% for backgrounds
Select only one combination per event
   Min [ Vertex χ2 (Λb) + IP χ2 (Λb) ]
 2.9% of selected signal events have more than one selected combination, on that:
   83% have only matched combinations, 3% have only not matched combinations,
   14% have matched and not matched combinations
   – Select a matched combination in 88% of those 14% (of 2.9%)
Expected S/B in a Λb mass window of ±50MeV
 ∀ τ(Λb) : 0.604 ± 0.041
 τ(Λb) > 0.2ps : 8.61 ± 0.39
Lifetime fit exercise will be done using:
  Signal events passing selection and lifetime fit cuts
  Background events passing pre-selection and lifetime fit cuts
 Statistics limited by number of pre-selected J/ψ prompts in the inclusive J/ψ sample
   Leq = 147.7 pb-1
   Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009   12
Lifetime fit
 RooFit
 Maximum likelihood

L=Π
   N

  i =1
           [ f P (t σ )P (σ )P (m σ )P (σ ) + (1 − f )P (t σ )P (σ )P (m σ )P (σ ) ]
               S   S
                    t
                        i   i
                             t   σt
                                 S    i
                                       t
                                           S
                                            m
                                                i   i
                                                     m   σm
                                                         S    i
                                                               m
                                                                      S
                                                                           t
                                                                           B   i   i
                                                                                    t   σt
                                                                                        B    i
                                                                                              t
                                                                                                  B
                                                                                                   m
                                                                                                       i   i
                                                                                                            m   σm
                                                                                                                B    i
                                                                                                                      m



   Proper time pdfs
     Signal: convolution with a Gaussian (μ = 0 ; σ = σti × Fσt) of a positive exponential
     Background: convolution with a Gaussian (μ = 0 ; σ = σti × Fσt) of
     – a negative exponential
     – two positive exponentials
     – and a prompt contribution
   Proper time error pdfs: convolutions of a Gaussian and a positive exponential
   Mass pdfs
     Signal: Gaussian (μ ; σ = σmi × Fσm)
     Background: 2nd order polynomial
   Mass error pdfs: convolutions of a Gaussian and a positive exponential
→ 25 parameters in total
 Fit results (Leq = 147.7pb-1)
   τ(Λb) = (1.237 ± 0.035) ps

         Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009                            13
Fit projections (1/3)




Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009   14
Fit projections (2/3)




Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009   15
Fit projections (3/3)




Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009   16
Toy MC Study: goodness of fit, pull…




Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009   17
Outlook
  Fake J/ψ background
    Inclusive b sample leads to a fake J/ψ background estimation
    13.3 (+9.9/-7.7) times higher (4 fake J/ψ events passing the selection)
    than the estimation from the inclusive b di-muon sample
      Fake J/ψ background would then contribute to as much as about 1/4 of
      the prompt J/ψ background
    Re-making the study increasing the fake J/ψ background by 7 [21] leads to
    a degradation on the average expected statistical error on τ(Λb) of only
    (0.7±0.5)% [(1.1±0.7)%]
  To do
    Control channel: B0 → J/ψ (→ μμ) KS (→ ππ)
    Estimation of systematic uncertainties
    Redo the study on DC09
      Asked for signal sample equivalent to DC06 one
      – This time would prefer to have Λb decayed in phase space
      – Channel also used for the PhD of Marwa Jahjah
        under the supervision of Ziad Ajaltouni
        » BR(Λb → J/ψ Λ), Λb polarization …
  … Redo on data …


Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009   18

More Related Content

Similar to Lambda_b particle lifetime measurement (6)

Mazurov ferrara2014
Mazurov ferrara2014Mazurov ferrara2014
Mazurov ferrara2014
 
Sparsenet
SparsenetSparsenet
Sparsenet
 
Native and IM-MS characterization of ADCs
Native and IM-MS characterization of ADCsNative and IM-MS characterization of ADCs
Native and IM-MS characterization of ADCs
 
A System Approach
A System ApproachA System Approach
A System Approach
 
FBA
FBAFBA
FBA
 
Monte Carlo Methods 2017 July Talk in Montreal
Monte Carlo Methods 2017 July Talk in MontrealMonte Carlo Methods 2017 July Talk in Montreal
Monte Carlo Methods 2017 July Talk in Montreal
 

More from Ahmed Ammar Rebai PhD

Evidence for the charge-excess contribution in air shower radio emission obse...
Evidence for the charge-excess contribution in air shower radio emission obse...Evidence for the charge-excess contribution in air shower radio emission obse...
Evidence for the charge-excess contribution in air shower radio emission obse...
Ahmed Ammar Rebai PhD
 

More from Ahmed Ammar Rebai PhD (20)

Finance data analysis_nuclear_physics_comparaison
Finance data analysis_nuclear_physics_comparaisonFinance data analysis_nuclear_physics_comparaison
Finance data analysis_nuclear_physics_comparaison
 
Marchés financiers et Mouvement brownien Peut-on rendre compte des fluctuatio...
Marchés financiers et Mouvement brownien Peut-on rendre compte des fluctuatio...Marchés financiers et Mouvement brownien Peut-on rendre compte des fluctuatio...
Marchés financiers et Mouvement brownien Peut-on rendre compte des fluctuatio...
 
Les milieux financiers: cours boursiers, entre instabilité et prévisions
Les milieux financiers: cours boursiers, entre instabilité et prévisionsLes milieux financiers: cours boursiers, entre instabilité et prévisions
Les milieux financiers: cours boursiers, entre instabilité et prévisions
 
Les milieux financiers: Entre aléas et prédictions
Les milieux financiers: Entre aléas et prédictionsLes milieux financiers: Entre aléas et prédictions
Les milieux financiers: Entre aléas et prédictions
 
Liste des projets TIPE (Travail d'Initiative Personnelle Encadré)
Liste des projets TIPE (Travail d'Initiative Personnelle Encadré) Liste des projets TIPE (Travail d'Initiative Personnelle Encadré)
Liste des projets TIPE (Travail d'Initiative Personnelle Encadré)
 
Epreuve de mathématiques informatique (modélisation) Agro/Véto BCPST 2017
Epreuve de mathématiques informatique (modélisation) Agro/Véto BCPST 2017Epreuve de mathématiques informatique (modélisation) Agro/Véto BCPST 2017
Epreuve de mathématiques informatique (modélisation) Agro/Véto BCPST 2017
 
Correction partie 1,2 et début 3 Epreuve de mathématiques informatique Banque...
Correction partie 1,2 et début 3 Epreuve de mathématiques informatique Banque...Correction partie 1,2 et début 3 Epreuve de mathématiques informatique Banque...
Correction partie 1,2 et début 3 Epreuve de mathématiques informatique Banque...
 
Sujet et Correction épreuve de mathématiques ESSEC ECE 2012
Sujet et Correction épreuve de mathématiques ESSEC ECE 2012Sujet et Correction épreuve de mathématiques ESSEC ECE 2012
Sujet et Correction épreuve de mathématiques ESSEC ECE 2012
 
Fiche méthodes sur les nombres complexes Prépas MPSI PCSI PTSI BCPST2
Fiche méthodes sur les nombres complexes Prépas MPSI PCSI PTSI BCPST2Fiche méthodes sur les nombres complexes Prépas MPSI PCSI PTSI BCPST2
Fiche méthodes sur les nombres complexes Prépas MPSI PCSI PTSI BCPST2
 
ESSEC 2015 Maths I ECE
ESSEC 2015 Maths I ECEESSEC 2015 Maths I ECE
ESSEC 2015 Maths I ECE
 
Epreuve mathématiques II ESSEC 2015 ECE + Correction des partie II et III
Epreuve mathématiques II ESSEC 2015 ECE + Correction des partie II et IIIEpreuve mathématiques II ESSEC 2015 ECE + Correction des partie II et III
Epreuve mathématiques II ESSEC 2015 ECE + Correction des partie II et III
 
Méthodes sur les séries numériques
Méthodes sur les séries numériquesMéthodes sur les séries numériques
Méthodes sur les séries numériques
 
Complément sur les espaces vectoriels normés et la topologie métrique
Complément sur les espaces vectoriels normés et la topologie métriqueComplément sur les espaces vectoriels normés et la topologie métrique
Complément sur les espaces vectoriels normés et la topologie métrique
 
Equations differentielles
Equations differentiellesEquations differentielles
Equations differentielles
 
Espaces vectoriels normés partie 1
Espaces vectoriels normés partie 1 Espaces vectoriels normés partie 1
Espaces vectoriels normés partie 1
 
Reduction endomorphisme partie 2
Reduction endomorphisme partie 2Reduction endomorphisme partie 2
Reduction endomorphisme partie 2
 
reduction des endomorphismes partie 1
reduction des endomorphismes partie 1reduction des endomorphismes partie 1
reduction des endomorphismes partie 1
 
Methodes pour algebre lineaire et dualite
Methodes pour algebre lineaire et dualiteMethodes pour algebre lineaire et dualite
Methodes pour algebre lineaire et dualite
 
Evidence for the charge-excess contribution in air shower radio emission obse...
Evidence for the charge-excess contribution in air shower radio emission obse...Evidence for the charge-excess contribution in air shower radio emission obse...
Evidence for the charge-excess contribution in air shower radio emission obse...
 
Ill-posedness formulation of the emission source localization in the radio- d...
Ill-posedness formulation of the emission source localization in the radio- d...Ill-posedness formulation of the emission source localization in the radio- d...
Ill-posedness formulation of the emission source localization in the radio- d...
 

Lambda_b particle lifetime measurement

  • 1. Λb lifetime measurement with Λb → J/ψ Λ Régis Lefèvre, Ahmed Rebai Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire – IN2P3/ CNRS Université Blaise Pascal – Clermont-Ferrand II Outline Motivations MC samples Pre-selection Selection Lifetime Fit Outlook
  • 2. Motivations HQE calculations up to O(1/mb4) τ(Λb) / τ(B0) = 0.88 ± 0.05 Calculations up to O(1/mb3) were giving around 0.94 Assuming τ(B0) = 1.530 ± 0.009 ps (PDG2008), this leads to the prediction: τ(Λb) = 1.346 ± 0.077 ps CDF Run II J/ψ Λ Prelim. (March 2007) 2.0σ higher than prediction … and 3.3σ higher than PDG2006 CDF Run II Λc π Prelim. (July 2008) seems to resolve the puzzle τ(Λb) = 1.410 ±0.046 ±0.029 ps – Compatible with prediction … and 2.0σ higher than PDG2006 … 1.8σ lower than J/ψ Λ measurement Worth doing another precise measurement in LHCb First study done on DC04 by Eric Conte and Stéphane Monteil Within Eric’s PhD: final state also used for T-violation studies with Ziad Ajaltouni Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 2
  • 3. MC Samples: DC06 Signal: Λb → J/ψ (→ μμ) Λ (→ pπ) 239,621 events - Leq = 592 pb-1 assuming BR(Λb → J/ψ Λ) = 4.7 ⋅ 10-4 Prompt J/ψ background: J/ψ (→ μμ) X 3,991,942 events - Leq = 1.20 pb-1 J/ψ from B background Inclusive b di-muon: at least one B hadron in 400 mrad and two opposite signs muons between 10 mrad and 400 mrad 25,865,679 events – Leq = 3.84 pb-1 B0 → J/ψ (→ μμ) X 5,415,440 events - Leq = 51.2 pb-1 with BR(B0 → J/ψ X) = 1.55% B+ → J/ψ (→ μμ) X Note: in PDG2008 6,034,777 events - Leq = 57.1 pb-1 with BR(B+ → J/ψ X) = 1.76% BR(B±/B0 → J/ψ X) Bs → J/ψ (→ μμ) X = (1.092 ± 0.032)% 640,611 events - Leq = 24.3 pb-1 with BR(Bs → J/ψ X) = 1.56% Fake J/ψ background Inclusive b di-muon An underestimate checked with inclusive b (at least one B hadron in 400 mrad) – 32,109,506 events - Leq = 0.105 pb-1 Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 3
  • 4. Towards pre-selection DaVinci v22r0p2 Loose pre-selection J/ψ from Standard Loose Muons ADMass(J/ψ) < 100 MeV Λ from – Standard Loose Protons, Standard Loose Downstream Protons – Standard Loose Pions, Standard Loose Downstream Pions ADMass(Λ) < 30 MeV Λb from J/ψ and Λ ADMass(Λb) < 500 MeV Running over 30,000 signal events Retains 76,210 combinations in 9,364 events 2,341 matched combinations – Acceptance × reconstruction efficiency of 7.8% with respect to DecProdCut » 1.62% with respect to 4π Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 4
  • 5. Pre-selection (1/4) Cut Matched Not matched Track χ2 Probability (μ+) > 10-6 96% 91% Track χ2 Probability (μ-) > 10-6 97% 92% Track χ2 Probability (p) > 10-6 94% 82% Track χ2 Probability (π) > 10-6 84% 55% All Track χ2 Probability Cuts 74% 37% Vertex χ2 Probability (J/ψ) > 10-3 98% 93% Vertex χ2 Probability (Λ) > 10-6 95% 68% Vertex χ2 Probability (Λb) > 10-6 96% 41% All Vertex χ2 Probability Cuts 89% 26% IP χ2 (Λb) < 25 98% 58% Efficiency on matched and not matched combinations in signal sample (applying cuts sequentially) Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 5
  • 6. Pre-selection (2/4) Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 6
  • 7. Pre-selection (3/4) Cut Matched Not matched ADMass(J/ψ) < 50 MeV 97% 96% ADMass(Λ) < 10 MeV 98% 35% All ADMass Cuts 95% 34% pT (μ+) > 200 MeV 100% 99.7% pT (μ-) > 200 MeV 100% 99.6% pT (p) > 500 MeV 99.8% 56% pT (π) > 100 MeV 98.9% 79% All pT Cuts 99% 44% All Pre-selection Cuts 61% 0.9% 64% on matched combinations with ADMass(Λb) < 50 MeV Efficiency on matched and not matched combinations in signal sample (applying cuts sequentially) Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 7
  • 8. Pre-selection (4/4) Fraction of events pre-selected Λb → J/ψ Λ : 6.04% J/ψ X : 0.660% Inclusive b di-muon : 0.0537% Bd → J/ψ X : 1.10% Bu → J/ψ X : 1.11% Bs → J/ψ X : 1.08% Inclusive b : 0.00279% Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 8
  • 9. Selection (1/4) Cut Signal Prompt J/ψ J/ψ from B Fake J/ψ t(Λ)>0 99.3% 53% 47% 51% t(Λ)/σt(Λ)>5 92% 21% 17% 12% p track type = π track type 91% 72% 69% 73% pT(μ+)+pT(μ-) > 2 GeV 99.9% 99.6% 100% 96% DMass(J/Ψ) ∈ ]-30; 28[ MeV 97% 95% 95% 56% ADMass(Λ) < 6 97% 86% 79% 76% IP χ2 (Λb) < 16 98% 98% 84% 83% pT(Λ) > 1.6 GeV 83% 27% 34% 39% pT(Λb) > 3 GeV 81% 36% 65% 43% All Selection Cuts 67% 9.9% 22% 17% On selected signal events one has about 1/4 of Long-Long and 3/4 of Downstream-Downstream Efficiency on signal [matched & ADMass(Λb) < 50 MeV] and background combinations (applying cuts sequentially) Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 9
  • 10. Selection (2/4) Signal Prompt J/ψ J/ψ from B Fake J/ψ Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 10
  • 11. Selection (3/4) Signal Prompt J/ψ J/ψ from B Fake J/ψ Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 11
  • 12. Selection (4/4) Lifetime fit cuts -1ps < t(Λb) < 10ps σt(Λb) < 70fs 8MeV < σm(Λb) < 20MeV Efficiency: 98.5% for signal, 91% to 94% for backgrounds Select only one combination per event Min [ Vertex χ2 (Λb) + IP χ2 (Λb) ] 2.9% of selected signal events have more than one selected combination, on that: 83% have only matched combinations, 3% have only not matched combinations, 14% have matched and not matched combinations – Select a matched combination in 88% of those 14% (of 2.9%) Expected S/B in a Λb mass window of ±50MeV ∀ τ(Λb) : 0.604 ± 0.041 τ(Λb) > 0.2ps : 8.61 ± 0.39 Lifetime fit exercise will be done using: Signal events passing selection and lifetime fit cuts Background events passing pre-selection and lifetime fit cuts Statistics limited by number of pre-selected J/ψ prompts in the inclusive J/ψ sample Leq = 147.7 pb-1 Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 12
  • 13. Lifetime fit RooFit Maximum likelihood L=Π N i =1 [ f P (t σ )P (σ )P (m σ )P (σ ) + (1 − f )P (t σ )P (σ )P (m σ )P (σ ) ] S S t i i t σt S i t S m i i m σm S i m S t B i i t σt B i t B m i i m σm B i m Proper time pdfs Signal: convolution with a Gaussian (μ = 0 ; σ = σti × Fσt) of a positive exponential Background: convolution with a Gaussian (μ = 0 ; σ = σti × Fσt) of – a negative exponential – two positive exponentials – and a prompt contribution Proper time error pdfs: convolutions of a Gaussian and a positive exponential Mass pdfs Signal: Gaussian (μ ; σ = σmi × Fσm) Background: 2nd order polynomial Mass error pdfs: convolutions of a Gaussian and a positive exponential → 25 parameters in total Fit results (Leq = 147.7pb-1) τ(Λb) = (1.237 ± 0.035) ps Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 13
  • 14. Fit projections (1/3) Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 14
  • 15. Fit projections (2/3) Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 15
  • 16. Fit projections (3/3) Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 16
  • 17. Toy MC Study: goodness of fit, pull… Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 17
  • 18. Outlook Fake J/ψ background Inclusive b sample leads to a fake J/ψ background estimation 13.3 (+9.9/-7.7) times higher (4 fake J/ψ events passing the selection) than the estimation from the inclusive b di-muon sample Fake J/ψ background would then contribute to as much as about 1/4 of the prompt J/ψ background Re-making the study increasing the fake J/ψ background by 7 [21] leads to a degradation on the average expected statistical error on τ(Λb) of only (0.7±0.5)% [(1.1±0.7)%] To do Control channel: B0 → J/ψ (→ μμ) KS (→ ππ) Estimation of systematic uncertainties Redo the study on DC09 Asked for signal sample equivalent to DC06 one – This time would prefer to have Λb decayed in phase space – Channel also used for the PhD of Marwa Jahjah under the supervision of Ziad Ajaltouni » BR(Λb → J/ψ Λ), Λb polarization … … Redo on data … Régis Lefèvre - Λb Lifetime - Flavour Physics Working Group - May 20th 2009 18