This document is a transcript from a court case between Linda Keeley and Guy McDonald Ltd regarding a Rolls Royce vehicle Ms. Keeley purchased. The following key details are provided:
- Ms. Keeley purchased a used 1969/70 Rolls Royce Silver Shadow from Guy McDonald Ltd in March 1981 for £7,950.
- Shortly after purchasing it, the vehicle began having mechanical issues. An inspection found many problems with the engine and other systems.
- There was disagreement between the parties about responsibility for repairs. Guy McDonald Ltd offered to investigate the complaints if Ms. Keeley brought the vehicle to them, but she had it inspected by an authorized Rolls Royce dealer instead.
port of miami part two revised (1) (2) (3)sean pierre
1) Maria Perez and her crew land a plane in Colombia to conduct a drug deal. However, Pulido Gonzalez, the son of the drug lord, slaps Maria and a shootout ensues where Maria kills Pulido and his men.
2) Back in Miami, Big Barry leads the Triple C Cartel crime group. He is informed that one of his men, known as Hit Man, needs to be bailed out of jail.
3) Case Gonzalez, the nephew of Colombian drug lord Lugo Gonzalez, is arrested but freed when Big Barry ambushes the prison transport bus holding Hit Man. Case offers Big Barry $2 million for the rescue and to help take down
Duke Automotive, the #1 independent CARFAX dealer in Augusta, is having a huge 3-day sale event this Memorial Day weekend with thousands in savings on over 100 vehicles and a free lunch on Saturday. Tim Duke grew up in the car business, learning from his grandfather who founded Duke Buick in 1956 and set high standards for quality. Now Tim owns his own dealership and focuses on thoroughly inspecting vehicles and providing customers with honest service rather than pressuring sales.
The document describes the materials used in a path design that runs alongside a creek. A stone wall retains earth along the lower path. A corten steel screen provides shading above the path and separates it from the street. A concrete path creates a structurally sound surface that is resistant to flooding from the creek. Douglas fir timber is used in raised sections of the path and bridge structures that span the creek bed.
Nuestra visión prospectiva es un documento escrito por Bryan Márquez y Ricardo Sida que presenta una visión de futuro. Propone una sociedad más justa e inclusiva con mayores oportunidades para todos y mayor conciencia sobre problemas como el cambio climático.
This architectural drawing document contains details for building sections and stair fabrication at scales of 1/8 inch and 1/2 inch equals 1 foot. Section details are provided at a scale of 1/8 inch equals 1 foot, and joint and stair fabrication details are shown at a scale of 1/2 inch equals 1 foot.
The document provides an agenda for a Web 2.0 training on June 1, 2009 that includes topics such as elevator speeches, target markets for AFLAC including baby boomers and generations X and Y, and how to communicate with these markets using social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter. It also includes links to videos about how AFLAC works and guides on using Twitter.
Coca-Cola‘s „Fans First“ Approach in Social CommunitiesBSI
Coca-Cola has adopted a "Fans First" approach to social media marketing that focuses on engaging with consumers and allowing them to generate their own brand-related content. On Facebook alone, Coke has over 750,000 likes, 120,000 comments, and 5000 mentions per day from fans sharing photos, videos and experiences with the brand. This highly engaged community interacts more than fans of other brands. Coke's approach prioritizes enabling fan contributions and conversations over direct advertising. This strategy has helped earn sustainable fan relationships and earned positive press over rivals like Pepsi that primarily use social media as a marketing channel.
port of miami part two revised (1) (2) (3)sean pierre
1) Maria Perez and her crew land a plane in Colombia to conduct a drug deal. However, Pulido Gonzalez, the son of the drug lord, slaps Maria and a shootout ensues where Maria kills Pulido and his men.
2) Back in Miami, Big Barry leads the Triple C Cartel crime group. He is informed that one of his men, known as Hit Man, needs to be bailed out of jail.
3) Case Gonzalez, the nephew of Colombian drug lord Lugo Gonzalez, is arrested but freed when Big Barry ambushes the prison transport bus holding Hit Man. Case offers Big Barry $2 million for the rescue and to help take down
Duke Automotive, the #1 independent CARFAX dealer in Augusta, is having a huge 3-day sale event this Memorial Day weekend with thousands in savings on over 100 vehicles and a free lunch on Saturday. Tim Duke grew up in the car business, learning from his grandfather who founded Duke Buick in 1956 and set high standards for quality. Now Tim owns his own dealership and focuses on thoroughly inspecting vehicles and providing customers with honest service rather than pressuring sales.
The document describes the materials used in a path design that runs alongside a creek. A stone wall retains earth along the lower path. A corten steel screen provides shading above the path and separates it from the street. A concrete path creates a structurally sound surface that is resistant to flooding from the creek. Douglas fir timber is used in raised sections of the path and bridge structures that span the creek bed.
Nuestra visión prospectiva es un documento escrito por Bryan Márquez y Ricardo Sida que presenta una visión de futuro. Propone una sociedad más justa e inclusiva con mayores oportunidades para todos y mayor conciencia sobre problemas como el cambio climático.
This architectural drawing document contains details for building sections and stair fabrication at scales of 1/8 inch and 1/2 inch equals 1 foot. Section details are provided at a scale of 1/8 inch equals 1 foot, and joint and stair fabrication details are shown at a scale of 1/2 inch equals 1 foot.
The document provides an agenda for a Web 2.0 training on June 1, 2009 that includes topics such as elevator speeches, target markets for AFLAC including baby boomers and generations X and Y, and how to communicate with these markets using social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter. It also includes links to videos about how AFLAC works and guides on using Twitter.
Coca-Cola‘s „Fans First“ Approach in Social CommunitiesBSI
Coca-Cola has adopted a "Fans First" approach to social media marketing that focuses on engaging with consumers and allowing them to generate their own brand-related content. On Facebook alone, Coke has over 750,000 likes, 120,000 comments, and 5000 mentions per day from fans sharing photos, videos and experiences with the brand. This highly engaged community interacts more than fans of other brands. Coke's approach prioritizes enabling fan contributions and conversations over direct advertising. This strategy has helped earn sustainable fan relationships and earned positive press over rivals like Pepsi that primarily use social media as a marketing channel.
Sistem RFID dan NFC di supermarket Hardys Tabanan dapat mempermudah proses pembayaran pelanggan. RFID akan memindai barang di troli secara nirkabel dan mengirimkan datanya ke kasir, sedangkan NFC memungkinkan pembayaran dengan mendekatkan kartu ke mesin kasir. Hal ini diharapkan dapat memperkecil antrian panjang di kasir dan meningkatkan kepuasan berbelanja pelanggan.
SymbioVille, a serious game on environmental and social entrepreneurshipSebastiaan de Neubourg
Manage your own company within the city of SymbioVille. Do you have what it takes to built a successful company while creating a resilient, efficient and circular economy?
SymbioVille is an accessible way to discover the real opportunities when sustainability meets business.
The serious game is available for free under a creative commons license.
Wendy Morris is a third year fashion design student at Design School Southern Africa in Pretoria. She has experience interning at Erre leather studio and working as a window dresser at Sandton City. She is seeking a permanent position where she can continue developing her expertise in fashion. Her CV provides her contact information, education qualifications from 2014 to present, references from past employers, and details of her driver's license and vehicle.
Mohammed Amer is a software developer with over 3.5 years of experience seeking a .NET position. He has strong skills in C#, ASP.NET, SQL Server, HTML, CSS, JavaScript and related technologies. Currently working as a programmer at Gleam Technologies Pvt. Ltd in Hyderabad since 2012. He has a Bachelor of Technology degree and has completed projects including e-commerce sites, content management systems, and applications for schools and businesses.
Tips for Holding Coffee Enemas ~ gerson
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159`
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110
The document provides an overview of various jewelry designers, brands, and artists featured in the October issue of the Jewellery Historian magazine, including Farah Khan, Wallace Chan, Zaffiro, Goralska, Caspita, and Eva Kountouraki. Brief descriptions are given for each one highlighting their background and creations. News items are also summarized about upcoming books, new watch collections from Gucci, and Avakian relocating one of its boutiques.
Several students from Selvamm Arts and Science College who are studying B.Sc. in Hotel Management & Catering Science are applying for 6-month trainee positions. In identical letters, each student introduces themselves, explains that training is required for their graduation, and asks to be considered for a trainee position where they will work to the company's satisfaction level over the summer period.
This document appears to be an exam paper for chemistry. It consists of multiple choice and short answer questions testing knowledge of chemistry concepts including the periodic table, chemical reactions, states of matter, and experimental procedures. The questions cover topics such as identifying elements on the periodic table, writing balanced chemical equations, describing phase changes and molecular motion, naming compounds, and explaining laboratory techniques.
Messenger & Anor v Stanaway Real Estate Limited & OrsPeter Bates
This judgment concerns a claim by James and June Messenger against Stanaway Real Estate for negligence regarding the failed sale of their property in 2006. The Messengers claim $2.77 million in losses. Stanaway joined the Messengers' son Gary, his real estate company Realty NZ, and law firm Simpson Western as third parties. The judgment examines the facts around the failed sale, the duties of each party, and whether their actions caused the Messengers' losses. It also considers defenses of contributory negligence.
LLAW 110BRIEFSChoose one (1) case fr.docxSHIVA101531
LLAW 110
BRIEFS
Choose one (1) case from the following list and write a brief on behalf of Plaintiff or Defendant.
Your grade will be based upon: (1) quality of writing and (2) quality of research (3) depth of analysis and legal reasoning. Please analyze your case carefully.
1. The developers of a luxury building entered into contracts with 41 prospective condo owners to sell each of them an apartment. Every contract stated that the buyer would be entitled to the return of the deposit if at least one sale didn't occur by September 1, 2008. The first sale took place on February 9, 2009. The prospective purchasers of the apartments are suing to recover their $16 million in security deposits. The developers claim that the documents contain a trivial error; that the date was intended to be September 1 2009.
2. Harry Smith, 84, hired a real estate brokerage firm to rent a studio apartment in his townhouse. Martin, 27, a broker, at the firm made him a proposition. "Why not rent it to me instead? The result was that Mr. Smith signed two handwritten leases on two studio apartments in his house with Martin and Martin's father for below market rates and for terms of up to 20 years. One apartment was rented for $1,167 a month and the other for $400.a month and they paid one year's rent in advance. The least expensive apartment in that area is $1950 a month. Now, Smith who needs the money, can't sell his house. "I am not a very good negotiator and I am not very good with numbers, "Mr. Smith said, "That was why I hired a broker to help rent the apartment." Smith is suing the brokerage firm and Martin. Martin was dismissed from the brokerage firm, but maintains that he did nothing wrong.
3. John Jones was working for a firm at which he had substantial benefits and would have been entitled to stock options. Then Robert Smith of XYZ Corp. offered Jones a position, promising him a large bonus if the company’s earnings exceeded $39.1 million within 3 years. Relying on that promise, Jones left his job and took the position at XYZ Corp. By the end of the 3rd year, projections indicated that XYZ’s earnings would exceed the required level. Jones left the company at the end of the 3rd year and later asked for his bonus. Robert Smith responded “no” stating that as Jones no longer worked for the company, he was not entitled to his bonus. Jones is suing, claiming that he is entitled to damages under the doctrine of promissory estoppel because he left a lucrative and secure position to take the job at XYZ Corp.
4. Matthew Lo ordered file cabinets from Triangle Manufacturing Company. The
contract stated that 50 file cabinets were to be delivered at $40 per cabinet in 5
equal installments. After delivery of 2 installments (20 cabinets,) Triangle
informed Matthew that it was losing money and would promise to deliver the
remaining cabinets only if Matthew would pay $50 per cabinet. Matthew agreed
and then refused to pay the additional amount. Triang ...
LEG 100 help Successful Learning/Snaptutorialwilliamtrumpz2Z
Paul and Chardonnay Mason went to a car dealership, R&G, to purchase a new car for an upcoming long trip. They signed blank sales documents in a rush to complete the purchase before the dealership closed. The next day, the salesperson, Hector, filled in the documents and the Masons drove off in their new car. However, Hector misrepresented key details of the sale. When the Masons returned, the dealership said they did not qualify for financing and demanded payment for use of the car. The Masons sued R&G in small claims court to recover the value of their trade-in vehicle. R&G argues the case should be sent to arbitration per the sales documents
The Masons sued R&G dealership for the value of their trade-in van after a problematic car purchase experience. R&G argues the case should be dismissed and sent to arbitration per the contract. As the magistrate judge, I must decide: 1) Whether to dismiss to arbitration or not; 2) If a valid contract existed; and 3) One other issue such as conversion, unjust enrichment, or fraud. My opinion analyzes the facts and law to make these determinations, citing two legal resources.
This judgment discusses an appeal regarding the recovery of credit hire charges. The appellant, Christopher Mungall, sought to recover credit hire charges for a replacement vehicle after the vehicle his son was using was damaged in an accident. The district judge had previously refused to award damages. The high court judge discusses the relevant case law and principles around recovering damages for loss of use when a vehicle is damaged. Ultimately, the judge finds that while the son did lose use of the vehicle due to the accident, as a non-owner he is not entitled to damages specifically for the credit hire charges, but may be entitled to general damages for loss of use.
The plaintiff's insurer was awarded $10,000 in damages in a subrogated claim for a motor vehicle accident. The defendant had stopped at a stop sign but proceeded when it was unsafe to do so, striking the plaintiff's vehicle. The court found the defendant solely responsible for the accident as the plaintiff had the right of way. Despite difficult weather conditions, the defendant had a duty to wait until it was safe before crossing the intersection. The court therefore awarded the agreed $10,000 damages amount plus interest to the plaintiff's insurer.
Rose & Frank Co v JR Crompton & Bros Ltd - The parties signed an agreement stating it was not a legal contract but a "gentlemen's agreement". When one party refused orders, the other sued but lost because there was no legally enforceable contract.
Foakes v Beer - A debtor agreed to pay off a debt in installments but the creditor could not sue to recover interest because allowing payment over time provided no new consideration for giving up the interest.
Hyde v Wrench - When one party offered to sell land for a price and the other counter-offered a lower price, the second response acted as a rejection and counter-offer rather than an acceptance, so no contract was
This document provides notes on property offenses in criminal law based on UK law. It discusses the key elements of theft which are: appropriation of property belonging to another, dishonestly, and with the intention to permanently deprive. It examines what can and cannot constitute property, when appropriation occurs, and how the courts have interpreted intention to deprive. Case law is discussed throughout to illustrate how these concepts have been applied. The summary focuses on the essential elements and structure of the document.
1.Maker manufactures printing presses. News, a publisher of a loca.docxpaynetawnya
1.Maker manufactures printing presses. News, a publisher of a local newspaper,was interested in purchasing a few presses. Rep, a representative of Maker, metwith Bill, the president of News, to describe the advantages of Maker'spresses. Rep also drew rough plans of the alterations that would be required inthe News pressroom to accommodate the new presses, including additional floorspace and new electrical installations, and left the plans with Bill. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
OnDecember 1, Bill received a letter signed by Seller, a member of Maker's salesstaff, offering to sell the required number of presses at a cost of $2.4million. The offer contained provisions relating to the delivery schedule,warranties, and payment terms, and stated that the terms will be good for 60days. Under the Uniform Commercial Code was a firm offer created?
A.Yes, since both parties were merchants.
B.Yes, since the letter was a signed writing giving assurances that the offerwill be held open.
C.No, since the offer stated the period of time for which it would beirrevocable.
D.No, since the offeror did not sign the form supplied by the offeror.
2.Pottery Plant Co. has entered into an agreement to buy its actual requirementsof potting soil for six months from Green Supplies, a garden supply company.Green Supplies has agreed to sell all the potting soil they will require forsix months. The agreement between the two companies is:
A.Unenforceable because it is too indefinite as to quantity.
B.Unenforceable because it lacks mutuality of obligation.
C.Unenforceable because it is illusory.
D. Avalid and enforceable contract.
3.Motors entered into an oral option with Hap, Inc., for $50. The option was topurchase at cost any late model used yacht received by Motors as a trade in ona new yacht for the next 100 days. Hap paid the $50 in cash and promptly sentMotors a signed memorandum which correctly described the agreement and itsterms. Motors did not respond until after 30 days had elapsed and it haddiscovered they had made a very bad bargain. Motors notified Hap that theywould no longer perform under the terms of the option, which they alleged wasinvalid, and enclosed a check for $50 to Hap. Which of the following iscorrect?
A.The oral option is invalid for lack of consideration.
B.The Statute of Frauds can be validly asserted by Motors to avoid liability.
CMotors has entered into a valid contract with Hap.
D.Options for a duration of more than three months are unenforceable.
4.Ellie, a 17 year old minor, contracted with Compco to purchase a used computerfor $700. The computer was purchased for Ellie's personal use. The agreementprovided that Ellie would pay $300 down on delivery and $100 thirty days laterover the next four months. Ellie took delivery and paid the $300 down payment.Twenty days later, the computer was seriously damaged as a result of Ellie'snegligence. Five days after the damage occurred a ...
Sistem RFID dan NFC di supermarket Hardys Tabanan dapat mempermudah proses pembayaran pelanggan. RFID akan memindai barang di troli secara nirkabel dan mengirimkan datanya ke kasir, sedangkan NFC memungkinkan pembayaran dengan mendekatkan kartu ke mesin kasir. Hal ini diharapkan dapat memperkecil antrian panjang di kasir dan meningkatkan kepuasan berbelanja pelanggan.
SymbioVille, a serious game on environmental and social entrepreneurshipSebastiaan de Neubourg
Manage your own company within the city of SymbioVille. Do you have what it takes to built a successful company while creating a resilient, efficient and circular economy?
SymbioVille is an accessible way to discover the real opportunities when sustainability meets business.
The serious game is available for free under a creative commons license.
Wendy Morris is a third year fashion design student at Design School Southern Africa in Pretoria. She has experience interning at Erre leather studio and working as a window dresser at Sandton City. She is seeking a permanent position where she can continue developing her expertise in fashion. Her CV provides her contact information, education qualifications from 2014 to present, references from past employers, and details of her driver's license and vehicle.
Mohammed Amer is a software developer with over 3.5 years of experience seeking a .NET position. He has strong skills in C#, ASP.NET, SQL Server, HTML, CSS, JavaScript and related technologies. Currently working as a programmer at Gleam Technologies Pvt. Ltd in Hyderabad since 2012. He has a Bachelor of Technology degree and has completed projects including e-commerce sites, content management systems, and applications for schools and businesses.
Tips for Holding Coffee Enemas ~ gerson
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159`
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110
The document provides an overview of various jewelry designers, brands, and artists featured in the October issue of the Jewellery Historian magazine, including Farah Khan, Wallace Chan, Zaffiro, Goralska, Caspita, and Eva Kountouraki. Brief descriptions are given for each one highlighting their background and creations. News items are also summarized about upcoming books, new watch collections from Gucci, and Avakian relocating one of its boutiques.
Several students from Selvamm Arts and Science College who are studying B.Sc. in Hotel Management & Catering Science are applying for 6-month trainee positions. In identical letters, each student introduces themselves, explains that training is required for their graduation, and asks to be considered for a trainee position where they will work to the company's satisfaction level over the summer period.
This document appears to be an exam paper for chemistry. It consists of multiple choice and short answer questions testing knowledge of chemistry concepts including the periodic table, chemical reactions, states of matter, and experimental procedures. The questions cover topics such as identifying elements on the periodic table, writing balanced chemical equations, describing phase changes and molecular motion, naming compounds, and explaining laboratory techniques.
Messenger & Anor v Stanaway Real Estate Limited & OrsPeter Bates
This judgment concerns a claim by James and June Messenger against Stanaway Real Estate for negligence regarding the failed sale of their property in 2006. The Messengers claim $2.77 million in losses. Stanaway joined the Messengers' son Gary, his real estate company Realty NZ, and law firm Simpson Western as third parties. The judgment examines the facts around the failed sale, the duties of each party, and whether their actions caused the Messengers' losses. It also considers defenses of contributory negligence.
LLAW 110BRIEFSChoose one (1) case fr.docxSHIVA101531
LLAW 110
BRIEFS
Choose one (1) case from the following list and write a brief on behalf of Plaintiff or Defendant.
Your grade will be based upon: (1) quality of writing and (2) quality of research (3) depth of analysis and legal reasoning. Please analyze your case carefully.
1. The developers of a luxury building entered into contracts with 41 prospective condo owners to sell each of them an apartment. Every contract stated that the buyer would be entitled to the return of the deposit if at least one sale didn't occur by September 1, 2008. The first sale took place on February 9, 2009. The prospective purchasers of the apartments are suing to recover their $16 million in security deposits. The developers claim that the documents contain a trivial error; that the date was intended to be September 1 2009.
2. Harry Smith, 84, hired a real estate brokerage firm to rent a studio apartment in his townhouse. Martin, 27, a broker, at the firm made him a proposition. "Why not rent it to me instead? The result was that Mr. Smith signed two handwritten leases on two studio apartments in his house with Martin and Martin's father for below market rates and for terms of up to 20 years. One apartment was rented for $1,167 a month and the other for $400.a month and they paid one year's rent in advance. The least expensive apartment in that area is $1950 a month. Now, Smith who needs the money, can't sell his house. "I am not a very good negotiator and I am not very good with numbers, "Mr. Smith said, "That was why I hired a broker to help rent the apartment." Smith is suing the brokerage firm and Martin. Martin was dismissed from the brokerage firm, but maintains that he did nothing wrong.
3. John Jones was working for a firm at which he had substantial benefits and would have been entitled to stock options. Then Robert Smith of XYZ Corp. offered Jones a position, promising him a large bonus if the company’s earnings exceeded $39.1 million within 3 years. Relying on that promise, Jones left his job and took the position at XYZ Corp. By the end of the 3rd year, projections indicated that XYZ’s earnings would exceed the required level. Jones left the company at the end of the 3rd year and later asked for his bonus. Robert Smith responded “no” stating that as Jones no longer worked for the company, he was not entitled to his bonus. Jones is suing, claiming that he is entitled to damages under the doctrine of promissory estoppel because he left a lucrative and secure position to take the job at XYZ Corp.
4. Matthew Lo ordered file cabinets from Triangle Manufacturing Company. The
contract stated that 50 file cabinets were to be delivered at $40 per cabinet in 5
equal installments. After delivery of 2 installments (20 cabinets,) Triangle
informed Matthew that it was losing money and would promise to deliver the
remaining cabinets only if Matthew would pay $50 per cabinet. Matthew agreed
and then refused to pay the additional amount. Triang ...
LEG 100 help Successful Learning/Snaptutorialwilliamtrumpz2Z
Paul and Chardonnay Mason went to a car dealership, R&G, to purchase a new car for an upcoming long trip. They signed blank sales documents in a rush to complete the purchase before the dealership closed. The next day, the salesperson, Hector, filled in the documents and the Masons drove off in their new car. However, Hector misrepresented key details of the sale. When the Masons returned, the dealership said they did not qualify for financing and demanded payment for use of the car. The Masons sued R&G in small claims court to recover the value of their trade-in vehicle. R&G argues the case should be sent to arbitration per the sales documents
The Masons sued R&G dealership for the value of their trade-in van after a problematic car purchase experience. R&G argues the case should be dismissed and sent to arbitration per the contract. As the magistrate judge, I must decide: 1) Whether to dismiss to arbitration or not; 2) If a valid contract existed; and 3) One other issue such as conversion, unjust enrichment, or fraud. My opinion analyzes the facts and law to make these determinations, citing two legal resources.
This judgment discusses an appeal regarding the recovery of credit hire charges. The appellant, Christopher Mungall, sought to recover credit hire charges for a replacement vehicle after the vehicle his son was using was damaged in an accident. The district judge had previously refused to award damages. The high court judge discusses the relevant case law and principles around recovering damages for loss of use when a vehicle is damaged. Ultimately, the judge finds that while the son did lose use of the vehicle due to the accident, as a non-owner he is not entitled to damages specifically for the credit hire charges, but may be entitled to general damages for loss of use.
The plaintiff's insurer was awarded $10,000 in damages in a subrogated claim for a motor vehicle accident. The defendant had stopped at a stop sign but proceeded when it was unsafe to do so, striking the plaintiff's vehicle. The court found the defendant solely responsible for the accident as the plaintiff had the right of way. Despite difficult weather conditions, the defendant had a duty to wait until it was safe before crossing the intersection. The court therefore awarded the agreed $10,000 damages amount plus interest to the plaintiff's insurer.
Rose & Frank Co v JR Crompton & Bros Ltd - The parties signed an agreement stating it was not a legal contract but a "gentlemen's agreement". When one party refused orders, the other sued but lost because there was no legally enforceable contract.
Foakes v Beer - A debtor agreed to pay off a debt in installments but the creditor could not sue to recover interest because allowing payment over time provided no new consideration for giving up the interest.
Hyde v Wrench - When one party offered to sell land for a price and the other counter-offered a lower price, the second response acted as a rejection and counter-offer rather than an acceptance, so no contract was
This document provides notes on property offenses in criminal law based on UK law. It discusses the key elements of theft which are: appropriation of property belonging to another, dishonestly, and with the intention to permanently deprive. It examines what can and cannot constitute property, when appropriation occurs, and how the courts have interpreted intention to deprive. Case law is discussed throughout to illustrate how these concepts have been applied. The summary focuses on the essential elements and structure of the document.
1.Maker manufactures printing presses. News, a publisher of a loca.docxpaynetawnya
1.Maker manufactures printing presses. News, a publisher of a local newspaper,was interested in purchasing a few presses. Rep, a representative of Maker, metwith Bill, the president of News, to describe the advantages of Maker'spresses. Rep also drew rough plans of the alterations that would be required inthe News pressroom to accommodate the new presses, including additional floorspace and new electrical installations, and left the plans with Bill. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
OnDecember 1, Bill received a letter signed by Seller, a member of Maker's salesstaff, offering to sell the required number of presses at a cost of $2.4million. The offer contained provisions relating to the delivery schedule,warranties, and payment terms, and stated that the terms will be good for 60days. Under the Uniform Commercial Code was a firm offer created?
A.Yes, since both parties were merchants.
B.Yes, since the letter was a signed writing giving assurances that the offerwill be held open.
C.No, since the offer stated the period of time for which it would beirrevocable.
D.No, since the offeror did not sign the form supplied by the offeror.
2.Pottery Plant Co. has entered into an agreement to buy its actual requirementsof potting soil for six months from Green Supplies, a garden supply company.Green Supplies has agreed to sell all the potting soil they will require forsix months. The agreement between the two companies is:
A.Unenforceable because it is too indefinite as to quantity.
B.Unenforceable because it lacks mutuality of obligation.
C.Unenforceable because it is illusory.
D. Avalid and enforceable contract.
3.Motors entered into an oral option with Hap, Inc., for $50. The option was topurchase at cost any late model used yacht received by Motors as a trade in ona new yacht for the next 100 days. Hap paid the $50 in cash and promptly sentMotors a signed memorandum which correctly described the agreement and itsterms. Motors did not respond until after 30 days had elapsed and it haddiscovered they had made a very bad bargain. Motors notified Hap that theywould no longer perform under the terms of the option, which they alleged wasinvalid, and enclosed a check for $50 to Hap. Which of the following iscorrect?
A.The oral option is invalid for lack of consideration.
B.The Statute of Frauds can be validly asserted by Motors to avoid liability.
CMotors has entered into a valid contract with Hap.
D.Options for a duration of more than three months are unenforceable.
4.Ellie, a 17 year old minor, contracted with Compco to purchase a used computerfor $700. The computer was purchased for Ellie's personal use. The agreementprovided that Ellie would pay $300 down on delivery and $100 thirty days laterover the next four months. Ellie took delivery and paid the $300 down payment.Twenty days later, the computer was seriously damaged as a result of Ellie'snegligence. Five days after the damage occurred a ...
The document discusses the legal requirements for consideration in contracts. It defines consideration as a benefit to one party or detriment to the other. Consideration must be provided by the promisee and can be in the form of an act, promise, or forbearance of a legal right. Consideration does not need to be adequate in value, only sufficient. Exceptions exist for past consideration and certain duties imposed by law or existing contracts when extra benefits are provided.
The document summarizes several important cases related to contract law in the UK and India. It discusses key principles such as:
1) The intention to create legal relations and whether agreements between family members constitute a legally binding contract.
2) What constitutes an offer versus invitation to treat and whether displaying goods amounts to an offer.
3) The need for acceptance of an offer to be unconditional and without deviation from the original terms, or it will be considered a counteroffer.
4) Circumstances where performance or conduct can imply acceptance of an offer, such as with rewards, rather than requiring direct communication of acceptance.
The plaintiff and their spouse were injured when the defendant hit their horse-drawn buggy while attempting to pass them on the highway. The plaintiff argued the defendant was negligent for failing to signal before passing, as required by law. The defendant counterclaimed the plaintiff was also negligent. The judge found the defendant was negligent for failing to signal and the plaintiff was not contributorily negligent. The appellate court agreed and ruled the defendant was responsible for paying the full $500 in damages requested by the plaintiff to cover their injuries.
Capital Punishment by Saif Javed (LLM)ppt.pptxOmGod1
This PowerPoint presentation, titled "Capital Punishment in India: Constitutionality and Rarest of Rare Principle," is a comprehensive exploration of the death penalty within the Indian criminal justice system. Authored by Saif Javed, an LL.M student specializing in Criminal Law and Criminology at Kazi Nazrul University, the presentation delves into the constitutional aspects and ethical debates surrounding capital punishment. It examines key legal provisions, significant case laws, and the specific categories of offenders excluded from the death penalty. The presentation also discusses recent recommendations by the Law Commission of India regarding the gradual abolishment of capital punishment, except for terrorism-related offenses. This detailed analysis aims to foster informed discussions on the future of the death penalty in India.
A Critical Study of ICC Prosecutor's Move on GAZA WarNilendra Kumar
ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan's proposal to its judges seeking permission to prosecute Israeli leaders and Hamas commanders for crimes against the law of war has serious ramifications and calls deep scrutiny.
The presentation deals with the concept of Right to Default Bail laid down under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 and Section 187 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023.
2. Page 2
Official Transcripts (1980-1989)
Keeley v Guy McDonald Ltd
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
MUSTILL J
134 NLJ 522, 134 NLJ 706, (Transcript:Association)
1 FEBRUARY 1984
1 February 1984
A Smith for the Plaintiff; T Warmington for the Defendants.
Stitt & Co; Stoneham Langton & Passmore.
MUSTILL J
Miss Linda Keeley had always wanted to own a Rolls Royce motor-car. It would be pleasant
to drive, and would lend prestige to her business. At last, on 24th February 1981, she saw a
car which attracted her, at an offering price which seemed within reach, in the showroom of
the defendant company, Guy McDonald Limited.
The car in question was a Rolls Royce Silver Shadow motor-car, first registered in 1969/70.
The defendants had bought it, some weeks previously, at a price of £7,000. They looked at
the vehicle when they bought it, but did not strip it down. One thing thet did know about the
vehicle was that the reading on the odometer - namely, about 38,000 miles - was inaccurate.
Their vendor told them that the true mileage was about 88,000 miles.
On Monday 2nd March Miss Keeley went to the showroom to look at the car. She was given a
test drive of about one mile. Everything seemed to be in order, and she liked the car.Miss
Keeley had little prior experience of owning motor-vehicles, and had no pretensions to
mechanical knowledge.
On the following day she called again at the defendants' premises and had a discussion
about the price with Mr. M.J. Osborn, a director of the defendant company. Originally, the
defendants were asking £8,950, but Miss Keeley was looking for a discount, because she
was paying cash and did not want to trade in another car. In the event, she was able to strike
a bargain at £7,950. It was arranged that she would collect the car on Thursday 5th March, by
which time the defendants would have had it put through a Department of Transport road test.
On 5th March Miss Keeley duly arrived to collect her car. On this occasion, or perhaps on the
3. Page 3
occasion of the previous meeting - by the end of the trial neither party was suggesting that it
mattered - two particular topics were discussed. First, Mr. Osborn told Miss Keeley that the
odometer reading was incorrect, and that the previous owner had given a figure of 88,000
miles. This was made the subject of a written declaration by Mr. Osborn, which he handed to
Miss Keeley. Second, mention was made of a guarantee. Miss Keeley had been told by a
friend that she ought to ask for a guarantee, and accordingly did so. Mr. Osborn was not
willing to provide a guarantee of any great substance, because Miss Keeley had bargained
such a large amount off the price. He did, however, offer to sell her an insurance policy, one of
several similar policies which were on the market, against failures of axle, gearbox and
engine. Miss Keeley did not want to buy insurance; she wanted a warranty from the
defendants themselves. In the end, Mr. Osborn wrote the following words on a printed order
form, signed by both parties, which recorded the substance of the transaction - "vehicle
supplied on the condition that the dealer undertakes gives one week's warranty".
Mr. Osborn then handed over to Miss Keeley a recent Department of Transport test certificate.
She paid the price, and drove the vehicle home. It seemed that the transaction had been
concluded in a manner satisfactory to both sides. The defendants had made a reasonable
profit on the resale of the car. Miss Keeley had bought a car of the type she wanted, at
substantially less than the asking price. Both parties believed that the car was in reasonable
condition, given its age and type. Unfortunately, however, things were not what they seemed.
There are colourful phrases, well understood in the motor-vehicle trade, to describe the car
which Miss Keeley had bought. Abstaining from the use of these, I will merely say for the
present that in some respects the car was seriously decrepit. There was no suggestion at the
trial that anyone acting on behalf of the defendants was aware of this. The original purchase
was a bad bargain for the defendants, and its resale was an even worse bargain for Miss
Keeley.
At first, Miss Keeley noticed only trivial defects, on her way home from the defendants'
showroom. However, on the following day she drove to the country for the weekend. She had
not been on the motorway for long when the oil and brake warning lights came on. She
stopped and added some oil, but the lights came on again. The same thing happened on the
way back to London. She was so nervous about the condition of the car that she did not care
to drive faster than 30 miles per hour.
At the beginning of the following week, Miss Keeley took the car in to Henlys (South London)
Limited, who are accredited Rolls Royce distributors, and asked them to examine the car.
According to Miss Keeley, her idea was that, if Henly's report showed anything wrong, she
would take it to the defendants so that they could put matters right. The report was
forthcoming two days later, and it did show that something was wrong. The report was of a
superficial nature, in that Henlys had not been instructed to open up the mechanism of the
car. Nevertheless there were clear indications that things were wrong - and quite possibly
seriously wrong - with the engine, clutch, gears, steering and suspension. Miss Keeley then
took the report round to the defendants. She had a discussion with Mr. Osborn, the substance
of which is in dispute. In the light of subsequent events, and of the way in which the case was
presented at the trial, I do not think it necessary to resolve this dispute. At all events, Miss
Keeley decided to consult solicitors.
There next followed a rather confusing series of events. I am satisfied that the account given
by Miss Keeley during her evidence in chief was put forward in good faith. Nevertheless,
when additional documents were produced by Henlys in the course of the trial, it became
clear that she was substantially mistaken. What seemed to have happened was this. On
Sunday 15th March the defendants wrote to Miss Keeley, referring to recent telephone
conversations, and continuing, "we would request that you bring the above vehicle to us at
your convenience in order that we may have the opportunity of investigating your complaints".
15th March was a Sunday. On the following day Miss Keeley's solicitors (Messrs. Stitt & Co.)
4. Page 4
telephoned Mr. Craker of Henlys asking him to begin the stripping down of the vehicle's
engine, with a view to providing a schedule of work that needed to be done to bring the
vehicle up to merchantable quality. Stitts followed up this request with a letter dated 17th
March. It seems, however, then to have been agreed that Henlys would not go ahead without
written instructions. On 18th March the defendants' letter of 15th March was received by the
plaintiff. Next, on 23rd March Miss Keeley wrote direct to Henlys, asking them to strip the car
down and report to her. This Henlys began to do, on or shortly after 26th March.
Throughout this period, there was no response to the defendants' letter of 15th March, asking
that the car should be brought in for investigation.
Henlys' detailed investigations revealed a depressing state of affairs, particularly as regards
the engine, in respect of which they recommended that it would be cheaper and more
satisfactory to fit a factory replacement, rather than attempt to repair the existing unit. Further
events during April are not well documented, except that Miss Keeley instructed Henlys not to
deliver the car up to the defendants for inspection, if they came in and asked for it.
On 1st May, Stitts wrote to the defendants asserting that the vehicle was not of merchantable
quality when purchased, and giving a detailed list of repairs which needed to be carried out.
The estimated cost of this was some £5,700. The letter concluded by inviting the defendants
to confirm tht they would be responsible for the cost of carrying out the repairs and informing
them that Henlys would not begin the repairs for seven days so that the defendants could
inspect the vehicle. The defendants replied, pointing out that they had Rolls Royce trained
personnel who would have no difficulty in undertaking any repairs. They referred to the letter
of 15th March, and emphasised that they would be happy to make an appointment to
investigate the complaints. The letter concluded -
"We would therefore suggest again that your client contacts us and arranges to bring the
vehicle to our premises in order that we may bring this matter to a satisfactory conclusion".
Miss Keeley stated in evidence, and I accept, that she never saw or knew about this letter
addressed to her solicitors.
On 12th May, Stitts wrote to the defendants, saying that in the view of their client only an
authorised Rolls Royce dealer could carry out the necessary repairs, and that since the
defendants had not taken the opportunity of inspecting the vehicle at Henlys' premises, Miss
Keeley had instructed Henlys to commence the work required to bring the car up to
merchantable quality. On the same day Stitts wrote to Henlys asking them to carry out the
repairs, sending the bill direct to Miss Keeley. Perhaps because of this last proviso, the repair
work did not commence for some days. In the meantime, the defendants wrote to Stitts on
14th May, saying that they had asked Miss Keeley to return the vehicle to their premises in
order that they could investigate her complaints and -
"with cooperation on both sides bring this matter to an amicable conclusion, i.e. carry out the
necessary repairs if required or alternatively refund Miss Keeley her money".
Once again, Miss Keeley said - and again I accept it - that she did not know about this offer. If
she had been aware that the defendants were willing to return her money, she would have
accepted - and, of course, the trial would never then have taken place.
Finally, on about 21st or 22nd May, Miss Keeley asked Henlys to carry out the work. This they
5. Page 5
duly did, at great (although not excessive) expense. In the result, Miss Keeley now brings this
action against the defendants, claiming damages for breach of the sale agreement in three
different amounts -
1. £6,460.60, being the cost of repairing the vehicle.
2.£250.12, being the cost of the initial examination and the subsequent more expensive
stripping of the engine and gearbox.
3. £231.74, being the cost of a routine service carried out by the defendants at Miss Keeley's
request, after the repairs had been completed.
Three different causes of action are relied upon in relation to these claims. First, it is said that
the cost of repairs and inspection can be recovered under the guarantee endorsed on the
order form. Second, there is a common law claim on the basis that the car was not of
merchantable quality and reasonably fit for its purpose when delivered. Finally, there is an
individual claim for the cost of the post-repairs' service, based on an allegation that the
defendants agreed to have the car serviced before delivery.
As the first limb of her claim, the plaintiff pleads that it was an express term of the contract
that the defendants undertook to compensate her in respect of all faults which manifested
themselves within one week of the vehicle's delivery to the plaintiff. In other words, she would
be entitled to have any such fault repaired by another garage, charging the defendants with
the cost.
At one stage, it was being contended for the plaintiff that she could base this claim on an
express oral undertaking. I am doubtful whether evidence of such an undertaking would in
principle be admissible, in the absence of any claim to rectify the "warranty" written on the
order form. In any event, however, the evidence did not support any such contention. Miss
Keeley asked for a warranty because a friend had advised her to do so. The sequence of
events was that she asked for a full warranty; was told that she could not have one, because
of the sharp reduction in the offer price; was then offered an insurance policy; which she
refused; and finally she accepted a warranty for one week only. It would be impossible to hold
from this sequence of events that the warranty was in some way intended to mirror, on a
shorter time-scale, the undertaking by an insurance company which she had been offered,
but had refused to pay for. Indeed, in cross-examination she made it plain that she did not get
the warranty instead of a policy, but got it because she had asked for one. An express oral
agreement could not carry the plaintiff's case any further than the words written on the order
form.
What do these words mean? The defendants might well have had substantial grounds for
arguing that they were too obscure to have any legal force at all. Very properly, however, the
defendants did not seek to repudiate their own undertaking in this way. But they are entitled to
say, and do say, that the words cannot on any view be read as a clear promise to pay the cost
of repairs, even if executed by third parties. I agree with this contention. Explicit words would
be needed to bring about such an extreme result. I can see no such words here. At the most,
the warranty could be enforced as an undertaking to take the car back in for repairs if any
faults manifested themselves within a week.
So construed, the warranty is of no value to the plaintiff in the circumstances of the present
case. The plaintiff never tendered the car to the defendants for repair. Indeed, when the
defendants expressly offered either to take the car in and repair it, or to accept its permanent
6. Page 6
return and refund the plaintiff's money, the offer was refused. The plaintiff cannot now
complain that the defendants have failed to perform a warranty which she never gave them
an opportunity to honour.
The plaintiff's claim at common law, which is not of course excluded by the addition of the
express warranty, is much more substantial. One must begin by considering the level of
performance demanded of the defendants. The precise boundaries of the two statutory
implied terms are notoriously difficult to fix. Furthermore, it must always be borne in mind that
judicial pronouncements in cases like Bartlett v. Sidney Marcus [1965] 2 All ER 753, [1965] 1
WLR 1013, Brown v Craiks [1970] 1 All ER 823, [1970] 1 WLR 753, Farnworth Finance
Facilities v Attryde [1970] 2 All ER 774, [1970] 1 WLR 1053, Crowther v Shannon Motor Co
[1975] 1 All ER 139, [1975] 1 WLR 30 and Lee v York Coach and Marine [1977] RTR 35, were
aimed at the particular circumstances then in suit, and cannot be uncriticially applied to every
factual situation. Nevertheless, the following propositions appear to be justified -
1. The vehicle must be fit to be driven on the road in safety.
2. The duration of the warranty extends beyond the moment of sale. The car must be in a
condition such that it can continue to be driven in safety thereafter.
3. The warranty is not unlimited in time. No car will run safely forever. The condition of the car
on delivery must be such that it will run safely for a reasonable time. What is a reasonable
time will depend on the individual circumstances of the transaction, including in particular the
age and type of vehicle.
4. As regards features of the car unrelated to its safety, the purchaser of a secondhand car
cannot expect to receive a perfect vehicle, nor indeed (I would suggest) a vehicle whose
condition conforms with the average. The primary rule caveat emptor is displaced to some
extent by the statutory implied terms, but not so far as to give the buyer complete protection
against hard luck or a bad bargain. A complaint does not arise unless the defect in question is
one which could not reasonably have been anticipated as a possibility by a reasonably
prudent and well-informed buyer.
Before turning to the facts, I must mention a point which was taken in relation to the price of
the Rolls Royce. This was appreciably below the price stated in Glass's Guide for a vehicle of
this model and date. Founding on this, the defendants suggested that the standard called for
by the statutory implied warranties should be adjusted downwards. I do not accept this. It is
true that the price of the goods is an element to be taken into consideration, but the element
of bargain must also be taken into account: Brown v Craiks [1970] 1 All ER 823, [1970] 1
WLR 753 supra. The defendants' stock position at the time of the sale enabled Miss Keeley to
drive a hard bargain. She was nevertheless entitled to receive a car which complied
reasonably with the standards to be expected of an H registration Silver Shadow Rolls Royce.
I now turn to the individual defects. It is not necessary to spend long on the engine. When Mr.
Craker and his workmen stripped the car down, he found that all the bearings were worn
through to their backings, the crankshafts were scored, the hydraulic cam followers were
badly worn on the bases, with consequent wear on the camshafts. The pistons were knocking
through excessive wear. He thought that the car had done more than 88,000 miles. The
engine would not have gone on much longer. Mr. Craker and Mr. Cane (who was called for
the defendants) agreed that it was very unusual to find engine wear in a Rolls Royce after
90,000 miles such that it was necessary to replace the engine altogether. Mr. Osborn himself,
in the course of his evidence, made no attempt to disguise that he was surprised and
dismayed by the condition of the car as revealed by the inspection, and would not have let it
7. Page 7
leave his premises if he had known what it was like.
In these circumstances no elaborate discussion is required to find that the state of the engine
rendered the car both unmerchantable and unfit for its purpose, and indeed by the end of the
trial the defendants were scarcely contending to the contrary.
By contrast, the condition of the brakes was in my view on the other side of the line. The
flickering of the brake warning light was a false alarm, probably due to faulty switches.
Certainly, there was wear in the linings of the brakes, but these could not in any event have
been expected to last for the lifetime of the car. They had about 6,000 miles of life left in them,
and this was, in my judgment, a reasonable time, for the purpose of compliance with the
warranty.
The next complaint related to the gearbox. Essentially, here, the problem was that the
clutches were worn: so badly worn, that, according to Mr. Craker, when he dropped the sump
on the second inspection, he found particles of the clutch plate lying in the sump, with the oil
burned. As I understand the evidence, it was impossible to tell how long the clutch would last
in this state, whether a matter of weeks or months. Nevertheless, it does seem to me that the
condition was markedly worse than could have been expected for a car of this age and
model, and that here again there was a breach of the implied terms.
Next there was the steering and suspension. This was described in Mr. Craker's report as
follows:
"The fore and aft sub-frame mountings were both worn and structurally weak causing the front
beam to fail and knock on the body. The off-side rear height control ram was obviously
defective as was the rear near-side height control flex pipe".
The evidence as a whole did not go so far as to satisfy me that the car was unroadworthy at
the time of delivery, as regards these defects. Nevertheless they were a potential source of
trouble, and should not have been present in a car of this age and type. In my view, they
contributed - although in not such a large degree as the flaws in the engine and gearbox - to
make the vehicle unmerchantable.
Finally, there was a miscellaneous collection of complaints, of which the most significant in
terms of money related to the final drive unit. In my judgment, these did not in themselves
cause the vehicle's condition to cross the line between disappointed expectation and
unacceptability.
The plaintiff has accordingly proved that the defendants were in breach of contract in a
number of respects, and is entitled to be compensated, under section 53(3) of the Sale of
Goods Act 1979, in terms of the difference between the actual unrepaired value of the car and
the value which it would have possessed if the implied warranties had not been broken.
Starting with the market value of the car, if it had complied with the warranty, we find that
Glass's Guide gives figures of £9,500 for this model in showroom condition, and £7,750 for
the trade-in value. I think it reasonable to take a round figure of £8,000 as the starting point of
the calculation, a sum not materially different from the price actually paid by Miss Keeley.
The actual value of the car as delivered cannot accurately be stated, on the evidence before
the court, partly because no witness spoke directly to the effect on the value, of the particular
8. Page 8
combination of defects which I have held to be breaches of contract, and partly because the
work done by Henlys undoubtedly brought about a substantial element of betterment. The
evidence of Mr. Cane, which in this respect was not controverted and which I accept, did
however set up certain marker-points. At the bottom end of the scale, Mr. Cane estimated the
delivered value of the car at about £5,500. He stated that after completion of all the work, the
value would be about £11,000 to £12,000. Allowing for the fact that the engine was further
down the road to complete failure than the other relevant items, I think it fair to work on a
betterment rate of 50 per cent. Applying this to the total repair cost of the engine, gearbox and
sub-frame, together with part of the labour charged against the brakes (because it was
necessitated by the removal of the engine), and then adding in the whole cost of a new spare
tyre and indicator switch, one arrives at a figure of £2,675. In addition, there were the costs of
the two inspections by Henlys. The first inspection was, in my judgment, a reasonable step to
take, given the fact that the car showed every sign of being, as it ultimately proved to be,
seriously defective. In my judgment the cost of the second inspection is also recoverable. The
defendants did not argue that in mitigation of damage the plaintiff ought to have had the
repairs carried out by them and nobody else. This being so, if a third party was legitimately to
do the repairs, it was not unreasonable to cause that third party to look at the car to see what
repairs were needed. I therefore add the sums of £66.70 and £183.42 to the amount
recoverable.
Finally, there was a separate claim in respect of the service carried out by Henlys, after the
completion of repairs. Miss Keeley's evidence was to the effect that when she bought the car
she had asked for, and had been promised, copies of the vehicle's service history, but that in
the event the defendants could not find it. She was therefore promised, so her evidence ran, a
pre-sales service instead. Plainly none was ever in fact performed. As will have appeared, I
do not regard Miss Keeley's recollection as wholly reliable. Nevertheless, her evidence on this
point was clear and convincing, and I accept it. Accordingly she is entitled to recover the
further sum of £231.74.
There will accordingly be judgment for the plaintiff for the total of £2,675.00, £66.70, £183.42
and £231.74, namely £3,256.86.
Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of £3,256.86 with costs.