Kay Sunderland
CASE ANALYSIS
Presented by :
Amar Keshari
Monica Singh
Priya Yadav
Rakesh Ranjan
Organization Hierarchy
Topics to be addressed
1. Personalities
2. Factors leading to conflict
3. Conflict analysis
4. Solution
Key People
O Caroline Nicholas
Role : Founder , CEO , Attain Learning
Qualification : BBA , MBA
Experience : 10 years of experience as a consultant & corporate trainer
.
Variety of position at IBM
O Dr. John Chama
Role : COO , Attain Learning
Qualification : PHD in Finance
Experience : Professor of Finance
O Kay Sunderland
Role : Account Director , Attain Learning
Qualification : BA , MBA
Experience : Account Executive at IBM & Oracle
O Mike Morgan
Role : Content Development Director
Qualification : Master of Science in Project Management
Experience : 10 Years of project management experience.
Personality Trait of Kay & Mike
Kay Sunderland
O Conventional
O Investigative
Production Oriented
Mike Morgan
O Artistic
O Realistic
O Enterprising
Development Oriented
Holland’s Model
Managerial Grid
Fiedler Model
The Conflict Process
Factors Leading to Conflict
Structural Factors
O Specialization
O Interdependence
O Authority relationships
Contd..
Personal Factors
O Personalities
O Perception
O Values and Ethics
O Communication Barriers
Process Conflict
O Conflict over how the work gets done.
O Difference in working style of Kay & Mike.
O Kay lacks Communication skills in a way she
was not able to impose company’s policy on
Mike
Functional Conflict
O Supports the goals of the group and
improves its performance.
O Creativity will be stimulated.
O Motivation for Change
Dimensions of conflict
handling intentions
Conflict Management
Collaborating
O To find an integrative solution.
O To merge insights, both from Kay & Mike.
O To gain commitment by incorporating consensus into
concern.
O To work through feelings that have interfered.
Solution
Alternatives
O Text Mike immediately about the issue
O Schedule a face to face meeting when Mike
is free
O Report Chama about Mike’s actions
Proposed plan of action
O Take an overview
O Text Mike regarding an urgent meeting
O Inform Chama about the issue
O Sort out differences using Collaborative
approach
O Apologise to the client
Thank You

Kay Sunderland

  • 1.
    Kay Sunderland CASE ANALYSIS Presentedby : Amar Keshari Monica Singh Priya Yadav Rakesh Ranjan
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Topics to beaddressed 1. Personalities 2. Factors leading to conflict 3. Conflict analysis 4. Solution
  • 4.
    Key People O CarolineNicholas Role : Founder , CEO , Attain Learning Qualification : BBA , MBA Experience : 10 years of experience as a consultant & corporate trainer . Variety of position at IBM O Dr. John Chama Role : COO , Attain Learning Qualification : PHD in Finance Experience : Professor of Finance O Kay Sunderland Role : Account Director , Attain Learning Qualification : BA , MBA Experience : Account Executive at IBM & Oracle O Mike Morgan Role : Content Development Director Qualification : Master of Science in Project Management Experience : 10 Years of project management experience.
  • 5.
    Personality Trait ofKay & Mike Kay Sunderland O Conventional O Investigative Production Oriented Mike Morgan O Artistic O Realistic O Enterprising Development Oriented Holland’s Model
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Factors Leading toConflict Structural Factors O Specialization O Interdependence O Authority relationships
  • 10.
    Contd.. Personal Factors O Personalities OPerception O Values and Ethics O Communication Barriers
  • 11.
    Process Conflict O Conflictover how the work gets done. O Difference in working style of Kay & Mike. O Kay lacks Communication skills in a way she was not able to impose company’s policy on Mike
  • 12.
    Functional Conflict O Supportsthe goals of the group and improves its performance. O Creativity will be stimulated. O Motivation for Change
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Conflict Management Collaborating O Tofind an integrative solution. O To merge insights, both from Kay & Mike. O To gain commitment by incorporating consensus into concern. O To work through feelings that have interfered.
  • 15.
    Solution Alternatives O Text Mikeimmediately about the issue O Schedule a face to face meeting when Mike is free O Report Chama about Mike’s actions
  • 16.
    Proposed plan ofaction O Take an overview O Text Mike regarding an urgent meeting O Inform Chama about the issue O Sort out differences using Collaborative approach O Apologise to the client
  • 17.