Joe rodota ives
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•264 views
Four alternatives for a route between two locations were identified: 1) Petaluma Avenue Lot/Burnett, which is the most accessible and currently used but less direct with crosswalk and parking lot traffic; 2) South Main/Burnett, which is not as accessible and direct but has crosswalks; 3) Willow/Calder, which is very indirect and not lighted or accessible; and 4) South High Lot, which is very indirect and not lighted, accessible, or public.
Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (6)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Joe rodota ives
- 5. Route Who? Direct? Currently Used? Lighted Crosswalks Accessible? Safe? Public? Score **A. “Petaluma Avenue Lot / Burnett” Ped/Bike B (1400 ft.) B 1 A B A C+ B. “South Main / Burnett” Ped only C (1450 ft.) C 2 C A A C- C. “Willow / Calder” Ped/Bike A (1140 ft.) C 2 F A A C- D. “South High Lot” Ped/Bike A (1145 ft.) A 2 D D F D
- 6. Route A. “Petaluma Avenue Lot/Burnett” • Pro • Most accessible • In use • Public • Con • South Main and Burnett crosswalk • Less direct • Parking lot traffic
Editor's Notes
- Council’s request re: SDAT report: Recommend route for temporary signage for ¼ mile between the 2 points
- CSAC looked at several criteria: Direct not too far from straight line Safe: street crossings – lighted crosswalks Vehicle egresses Parking lot use Likely to meet ADA, incl. street furniture/obstructions Public: avoid private property issues/rights-of-way Can it be signed? Useful Both peds & bikes? Will people use it?
- 4 alternatives meeting all or most of criteria
- Orientation: Joe Rodota trail end @ Petaluma Ave w/lighted crossing Lighted crossing @ Post Office Ives Park east entrance @ S. High S. High City lot Petaluma Ave/Main Street City lots ROUTES A: via Petaluma Ave City lot/Main Street/Burnett B. Via S. Main and Burnett C. Via Willow D. Via S. High City lot Distances range from 1140 ft. to 1450 ft. -- ±.25 mile Surprisingly difficult to meet all criteria – no perfect solution Started w/C –already on Bike & Ped MP, but too steep for many D is probably most used, but no r/w in private lot, conflicts w/cars and awkward for cyclists B: longest, no bike route, street furniture/egress issues A: OK, but no lighted Xings@ Burnett/S. Main – accidents here
- Scoring the routes for comparison – decent scores in some areas for all routes, but clear problems everywhere
- Despite crosswalk issues, CSAC recommends Route A No ADA issues All public property 12% of cyclist/ped accidents @Burnett & S. Main, but lighted Xings no guarantee of safety – accidents @ Joe Rodota Not most direct, but used by many peds & cyclists Parking lot traffic, but not heavy and mostly slow Variation: Council could choose to have peds go on Route B (S. Main to Burnett) and sign for cyclists either Route A or C Questions?