The document summarizes the results of a robot soccer game qualification round and final round between 4 student teams and 2 sample teams. In the qualification round, the teams each played 10 games and were scored based on their placement in each game. The top 2 teams advanced to the final round, where they played 3 games against each other. The team with the highest cumulative score across the 3 final games was declared the winner.

1. Asterobots - No pain, No vein -
National Institution for the Promotion of Youth Education
The 17th November, 2012
Kazunori Sakamoto Waseda University
Daniel Perez Waseda University
Hiroaki Hosono Tokyo Institute of Technology
Seiji Sato Waseda University

2. Rule of qualification round
• Prepare 4 teams + 2 our samples
• Each team plays 10 games randomly
• Calculate scores with 1st:21, 2 nd: 15,
3 rd:10, 4 th:6, 5 th:3, 6 th:1 points
• The highest 2 teams advance to the final!
2012/12/26 2

3. Rule of qualification round
• Prepare 4 teams + 2 our samples
• Each team plays 10 games randomly
• Calculate scores with 1st:21, 2 nd: 15,
3 rd:10, 4 th:6, 5 th:3, 6 th:1 points
• The highest 2 teams advance to the final!
2012/12/26 3

4. Team introduction
• hasi (KLab): Takuya Hashimoto
• mecha_g3 (KLab): Shingo Inada
• methane1 (KLab): Naoya Inada
• Oyososan (Google): Hisayori Noda
Ryo Hashimoto
Taiju Tsuiki
Hitoshi Yoshida
Takashi Tayama
• Wand Player (Our sample)
• JoeJack (Our sample)
2012/12/26 4

5. Let’s watch the games
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5r2kWlSrgfw
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoPw748TDsk
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hS1i5J6tNsE
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glZUgOrbXKk
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZhpfYgyL9s
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKY4PkojxoM
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQXgagYmfe0
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_JYW7taboM
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eccv4iFUOM
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjiH5EPhshw
2012/12/26 5

6. Ranks of qualification round
Name Ranks Score
methane1 2 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 125
mecha_g3 5 3 4 3 3 5 6 2 3 4 74
Wand Player 1 5 5 4 4 4 5 3 6 5 62
JoeJack 4 4 6 6 6 6 3 6 5 6 31
Oyososan 6 6 3 2 5 1 1 4 1 2 114
hasi 3 1 1 5 1 2 2 1 4 1 154
2012/12/26 6

7. Rule of final round
• Prepare 4 students’ and 2 guests’ teams
– not_shiokawa, wakaba,
oshieteZukky, <<o<>_<*>o>>
• We conducted 3 games
• Calculate scores with 1st:21, 2 nd: 15,
3 rd:10, 4 th:6, 5 th:3, 6 th:1 points
• The highest team wins!
2012/12/26 7

8. Let’s watch the games
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoW2cjwnRzM
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnIHc55_D6Y
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BQomwyB2Lo
2012/12/26 8

9. Matches of 1st round
methane1 wakaba wakaba
not_shiokawa mathane1 <<o<>_<*>o>>
wakaba oshieteZukky oshieteZukky
ohieteZukky hasi not_shiokawa
<<o<>_<*>o>> <<o<>_<*>o>> metahne1
hasi not_shiokawa hasi

10. Ranking after 1st round
Rank AI name 1st Score
1 <<o<>_<*>o>> 1 (21) 21
2 hasi 2 (15) 15
3 wakaba 3 (10) 10
4 methane1 4 (6) 6
5 not_shiokawa 5 (3) 3
6 oshieteZukky 6 (1) 1
2012/12/26 10

11. Matches of 2 nd round
methane1 wakaba wakaba
not_shiokawa mathane1 <<o<>_<*>o>>
wakaba oshieteZukky oshieteZukky
ohieteZukky hasi not_shiokawa
<<o<>_<*>o>> <<o<>_<*>o>> metahne1
hasi not_shiokawa hasi

12. Ranking after 2nd round
Rank AI name 1st 2nd Score
1 hasi 2 (15) 1 (21) 36
2 wakaba 3 (10) 2 (15) 25
3 <<o<>_<*>o>> 1 (21) 5 (3) 24
4 methane1 4 (6) 4 (6) 12
5 oshieteZukky 6 (1) 3 (10) 11
6 not_shiokawa 5 (3) 6 (1) 4
2012/12/26 12

13. Matches of 3 rd round
methane1 wakaba wakaba
not_shiokawa mathane1 <<o<>_<*>o>>
wakaba oshieteZukky oshieteZukky
ohieteZukky hasi not_shiokawa
<<o<>_<*>o>> <<o<>_<*>o>> metahne1
hasi not_shiokawa hasi

14. Ranking after 3 rd round
Rank AI name 1st 2nd 3 rd Score
1 hasi 2 (15) 1 (21) 3 (10) 46
2 <<o<>_<*>o>> 1 (21) 5 (3) 1 (21) 45
3 methane1 4 (6) 4 (6) 2 (15) 27
4 wakaba 3 (10) 2 (15) 6 (1) 26
5 oshieteZukky 6 (1) 3 (10) 4 (6) 17
6 not_shiokawa 5 (3) 6 (1) 5 (3) 7
2012/12/26 14

15. LOC(Lines of code) and score
1600
1400
1200
1000
Score
800
600
A large program is
400
stronger than a small
200 program ... ?
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Lines of code
2012/12/26 15

16. Complexity and score
1600
1400
1200
1000
Score
800
600
400
Is a simple code more powerful than a
200
complex code ? too low correlativity ...
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Cyclomatic complexity
2012/12/26 16

17. So what ...?
Metrics should be measured
for a specific purpose 
2012/12/26 17

18. Thank you!
See you again
@JavaChallenge2013
2012/12/26 18