A case study on Bata




               By
   S. Rama krishnan(301228)
      K. Raj Kumar(301225)
History of the Company
The Company was originally incorporated as BataShoe
Company Limited on December 23, 1931 under Indian
Companies Act, 1913 for the purpose of manufacturing and
marketing of all types of footwear,footwear
components, leather and products allied tothe footwear
trade.


Subsequently, the Company changed its name to.Bata Shoe
Company Private Limited. on April 6, 1956upon conversion
into private company. The Companychanged its name from
Bata Shoe Company PrivateLimited to .Bata Shoe Company
Limited uponconversion to a public company on April
18, 1973.
Contd..
The name was once again changed to the currentname, i.e. Bata
India Limited, on April 23, 1973.


The Company was promoted by Leader
A.G., St.Moritz, Switzerland, a member of the multinationalBata
Shoe Organisation (BSO) with a 100% EquityShareholding, and
consequently, the Company too isa member of the BSO.


The BSO consists of independently run companiesoperating in
several countries across the world.
BataLimited, Toronto, Canada acts as the headquarters of BSO
CONTD..
    Bata Shoe Organisation provides
    an importantinterchange of new manufacturing
    technologies,machine design, factory lay-out plans
    advertisingmarket forecasts, fashion
    trends, modernmarketing techniques, new material
    testing andalso information on the most advanced
    machineryand technology for production of shoes
    are madeavailable to the Bata group of
    companies,including Bata India Limited
Case facts


Throughout its inception
     Bata had shown         At the centre of     Bata has always
 growthin profits, with        all labour          faced labour
 the only loss shown in      problems was          problems in
 1995, but in2000 Bata        the BMUor         itsmajor factories
       again began          Bata Mazdoor       in West Bengal and
  its downward phase         union in West          Bangalore.
whichwas mainly due to
    labour problems.            Bengal.
Contd..
 The company after making a huge loss in
  1995wanted to save itself by bringing in W.K
  Westonwho was an expert in turning around
  performance.
 Weston brought in his own team and
  changed theentire top management of the
  company.
 Weston made major changes like
  overhaulingoperations and selling the
  Bata headquarters inCalcutta to cover losses.
  The commercialdepartment was also shifted
  to Bata Nagar despiteresistance from trade
  unions
Contd.

   The management also retrenched 250 managers aswell as
    juniors and froze recruitment activities whilefilling up gaps
    through internal transfers.
   What added fuel to the fire between management andtrade
    unions was the assault on Weston and a senior officer by
    members of the union.
   Although Bata had plants in
    Faridabad, Bangalore,Patna, Hosur but most of the
    output came frombatanagar factory in west Bengal which
    was plaguedby influences of political parties which
    madenegotiation with trade union very difficult.
Contd..
   Assault case influenced the SVP to
    stop renewedinvestment plans in batanagar which
    broughtinference from CPIM the ruling party at
    the time.This brought violence which was more of
    apolitical issue then labour.
   Meetings between the management and unionfailed
    which led the factory to be shut down for several
    months.

   A lockout also took place in Bangalore peenyafactory
    in 2000 due to disputes regarding expiry of wage
    agreement.
Contd..
• Lifting of the lockout also did not solve
  anyproblems as employees demanded
  thatsuspended colleagues be called back.
• In 2004 Bata began a huge downsizing
  activity inwest Bengal which it justified by
  stating that it wasoutsourcing its finished
  products from china
• This also led the workers to approach
  thegovernment to intervene on their behalf.
Inferences
  The reasons for labour problems in Bata co. Ltd were as
  follows:-
• The management failed to make any
  meaningfulcommunication with the workers before
  making anydecisions.
• Bata had opened factories where trade unions
  andpolitical parties had a very strong and
  negativeinfluence.
• The interference of political parties ensures that
  thematters became violent and through which
  suchparties could satisfy their own agenda.
Contd..
• The company took drastic steps very frequently
  like lock down, retrenchments, downsizing.
• The top management only show the benefits
  of the company and not the problems of workers.
• The workers were heavily influenced by
  tradeunion and had no logic in decision making.
• Expatriates do not know about Indian culture
  andsensibilities of the Indian workers and hence
  the decision was not very beneficial.
MERCI

IR Case Study

  • 1.
    A case studyon Bata By S. Rama krishnan(301228) K. Raj Kumar(301225)
  • 3.
    History of theCompany The Company was originally incorporated as BataShoe Company Limited on December 23, 1931 under Indian Companies Act, 1913 for the purpose of manufacturing and marketing of all types of footwear,footwear components, leather and products allied tothe footwear trade. Subsequently, the Company changed its name to.Bata Shoe Company Private Limited. on April 6, 1956upon conversion into private company. The Companychanged its name from Bata Shoe Company PrivateLimited to .Bata Shoe Company Limited uponconversion to a public company on April 18, 1973.
  • 4.
    Contd.. The name wasonce again changed to the currentname, i.e. Bata India Limited, on April 23, 1973. The Company was promoted by Leader A.G., St.Moritz, Switzerland, a member of the multinationalBata Shoe Organisation (BSO) with a 100% EquityShareholding, and consequently, the Company too isa member of the BSO. The BSO consists of independently run companiesoperating in several countries across the world. BataLimited, Toronto, Canada acts as the headquarters of BSO
  • 5.
    CONTD..  Bata Shoe Organisation provides an importantinterchange of new manufacturing technologies,machine design, factory lay-out plans advertisingmarket forecasts, fashion trends, modernmarketing techniques, new material testing andalso information on the most advanced machineryand technology for production of shoes are madeavailable to the Bata group of companies,including Bata India Limited
  • 6.
    Case facts Throughout itsinception Bata had shown At the centre of Bata has always growthin profits, with all labour faced labour the only loss shown in problems was problems in 1995, but in2000 Bata the BMUor itsmajor factories again began Bata Mazdoor in West Bengal and its downward phase union in West Bangalore. whichwas mainly due to labour problems. Bengal.
  • 7.
    Contd..  The companyafter making a huge loss in 1995wanted to save itself by bringing in W.K Westonwho was an expert in turning around performance.  Weston brought in his own team and changed theentire top management of the company.  Weston made major changes like overhaulingoperations and selling the Bata headquarters inCalcutta to cover losses. The commercialdepartment was also shifted to Bata Nagar despiteresistance from trade unions
  • 8.
    Contd.  The management also retrenched 250 managers aswell as juniors and froze recruitment activities whilefilling up gaps through internal transfers.  What added fuel to the fire between management andtrade unions was the assault on Weston and a senior officer by members of the union.  Although Bata had plants in Faridabad, Bangalore,Patna, Hosur but most of the output came frombatanagar factory in west Bengal which was plaguedby influences of political parties which madenegotiation with trade union very difficult.
  • 9.
    Contd..  Assault case influenced the SVP to stop renewedinvestment plans in batanagar which broughtinference from CPIM the ruling party at the time.This brought violence which was more of apolitical issue then labour.  Meetings between the management and unionfailed which led the factory to be shut down for several months.  A lockout also took place in Bangalore peenyafactory in 2000 due to disputes regarding expiry of wage agreement.
  • 10.
    Contd.. • Lifting ofthe lockout also did not solve anyproblems as employees demanded thatsuspended colleagues be called back. • In 2004 Bata began a huge downsizing activity inwest Bengal which it justified by stating that it wasoutsourcing its finished products from china • This also led the workers to approach thegovernment to intervene on their behalf.
  • 11.
    Inferences Thereasons for labour problems in Bata co. Ltd were as follows:- • The management failed to make any meaningfulcommunication with the workers before making anydecisions. • Bata had opened factories where trade unions andpolitical parties had a very strong and negativeinfluence. • The interference of political parties ensures that thematters became violent and through which suchparties could satisfy their own agenda.
  • 12.
    Contd.. • The companytook drastic steps very frequently like lock down, retrenchments, downsizing. • The top management only show the benefits of the company and not the problems of workers. • The workers were heavily influenced by tradeunion and had no logic in decision making. • Expatriates do not know about Indian culture andsensibilities of the Indian workers and hence the decision was not very beneficial.
  • 13.