Making Sense: Talking Data Management with Researchers Catharine Ward, Cambridge University Library Wednesday, 8 th  December, 2010   On behalf of: Lesley Freiman, Cambridge University Library Sarah Jones, Laura Molloy and Kellie Snow, University of Glasgow A pilot project for supporting research data management
What is Incremental? Collaborative project between Cambridge University Library and HATII, University of Glasgow.  Aim: To improve research data management within our own institutions by focusing on better advice, training and support –  the people aspects .
Scoping study: method Building on HATII digital preservation study Semi-structured interviews Similar departments to allow comparison Glasgow (2009): Archaeology Chemistry Engineering English Public Health Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Cambridge (2010) Archaeology Chemistry Engineering English Public Health Scott Polar Research Institute
Scoping study: findings   Creating and managing files File naming and structuring, lack of selection, increasing volumes. Storage and back-up Variety of media,   who backs up?  Preservation and re-use Obsolescence, best formats, available support Data sharing Personal investment, practicalities, obstacles. Existing guidance and training Wrong time / format, can’t find, hard to use, jargon!, want person to call…
Scoping guidance & training requirements Russell Group website survey http://incrementalproject.wordpress.com/2010/08/20/the-crossing-point/   Researcher observations http://incrementalproject.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/initial-test-user-thoughts-and-my-cautious-optimism/
Language matters Using the phrase ‘Looking after your data’ rather than ‘preserving your data’ Suspicious of ‘policies’ which imply a mandate. More receptive to ‘guidance’ or advice’ Must translate data management from specialist to non specialist
Four recommendations http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/ preservation/incremental/ documents/Incremental_Scoping_ Report_170910.pdf
1. Produce simple guidance on creating,  storing and managing data
 
University resources & guidance Local & central support contacts
 
2. Offer practical training resources with discipline‐specific examples ‘ Curation for researchers’ course principles of data management case studies and breakouts to put in context collaborate with university services to profile support are producing online materials from this
Digital Curation for Researchers workshop Case study of English Language projects Key considerations Local support
Thematic seminars  Lunchtime seminars (2hr) in Spring at Cambridge on: Ethics/confidential data  - 19 th  January 2011 – Dr Louise Corti (UK Data Archive) IPR - 2 nd  February 2011 – Andrew Charlesworth (JISC/University of Bristol) FOI - 16 th  February 2011 – Mike Baillie (Queens University, Belfast) Managing diverse data formats - 2 nd  March 2011 – Paul Russell (English, Cambridge University), Stephen Gray (JISC/Bristol University), Fannar Haddad (independent)
Workshops in February 2011 at Glasgow on data management for researchers in : Performance / live art Archaeology Format:  Morning session on best practice case studies & panel Afternoon session on support at Glasgow Disciplinary workshops
Online training resources Course and workshop outputs e.g. video case studies, audio-synced slides, screencasts Modular slides/resources that can be dropped into other courses More visual formats e.g. flow diagrams, factsheets
3. Connect researchers with support staff for tailored advice and partnering •  Raise awareness of existing support staff and services  through data management web pages and training •  Build links with research office to point researchers to relevant support when apply for grants
4. Work towards a DM infrastructure
Conclusions There is a need for support with day to day issues of creating and managing data. Data management is mostly a ‘people’ problem. Providing brief and accessible guidance, training and support to researchers will be effective in the long term.
Thanks for listening   Any questions? Email:  Catharine Ward -  [email_address] Project website:  http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/preservation/incremental/ Cambridge Dataman web pages: http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/dataman/ Project blog: http:// incrementalproject.wordpress.com / Twitter: JISCincremental

Incremental idcc 08_12_10_slideshare

  • 1.
    Making Sense: TalkingData Management with Researchers Catharine Ward, Cambridge University Library Wednesday, 8 th December, 2010 On behalf of: Lesley Freiman, Cambridge University Library Sarah Jones, Laura Molloy and Kellie Snow, University of Glasgow A pilot project for supporting research data management
  • 2.
    What is Incremental?Collaborative project between Cambridge University Library and HATII, University of Glasgow. Aim: To improve research data management within our own institutions by focusing on better advice, training and support – the people aspects .
  • 3.
    Scoping study: methodBuilding on HATII digital preservation study Semi-structured interviews Similar departments to allow comparison Glasgow (2009): Archaeology Chemistry Engineering English Public Health Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Cambridge (2010) Archaeology Chemistry Engineering English Public Health Scott Polar Research Institute
  • 4.
    Scoping study: findings Creating and managing files File naming and structuring, lack of selection, increasing volumes. Storage and back-up Variety of media, who backs up? Preservation and re-use Obsolescence, best formats, available support Data sharing Personal investment, practicalities, obstacles. Existing guidance and training Wrong time / format, can’t find, hard to use, jargon!, want person to call…
  • 5.
    Scoping guidance &training requirements Russell Group website survey http://incrementalproject.wordpress.com/2010/08/20/the-crossing-point/ Researcher observations http://incrementalproject.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/initial-test-user-thoughts-and-my-cautious-optimism/
  • 6.
    Language matters Usingthe phrase ‘Looking after your data’ rather than ‘preserving your data’ Suspicious of ‘policies’ which imply a mandate. More receptive to ‘guidance’ or advice’ Must translate data management from specialist to non specialist
  • 7.
    Four recommendations http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/preservation/incremental/ documents/Incremental_Scoping_ Report_170910.pdf
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    University resources &guidance Local & central support contacts
  • 11.
  • 12.
    2. Offer practical training resources withdiscipline‐specific examples ‘ Curation for researchers’ course principles of data management case studies and breakouts to put in context collaborate with university services to profile support are producing online materials from this
  • 13.
    Digital Curation forResearchers workshop Case study of English Language projects Key considerations Local support
  • 14.
    Thematic seminars Lunchtime seminars (2hr) in Spring at Cambridge on: Ethics/confidential data - 19 th January 2011 – Dr Louise Corti (UK Data Archive) IPR - 2 nd February 2011 – Andrew Charlesworth (JISC/University of Bristol) FOI - 16 th February 2011 – Mike Baillie (Queens University, Belfast) Managing diverse data formats - 2 nd March 2011 – Paul Russell (English, Cambridge University), Stephen Gray (JISC/Bristol University), Fannar Haddad (independent)
  • 15.
    Workshops in February2011 at Glasgow on data management for researchers in : Performance / live art Archaeology Format: Morning session on best practice case studies & panel Afternoon session on support at Glasgow Disciplinary workshops
  • 16.
    Online training resourcesCourse and workshop outputs e.g. video case studies, audio-synced slides, screencasts Modular slides/resources that can be dropped into other courses More visual formats e.g. flow diagrams, factsheets
  • 17.
    3. Connect researcherswith support staff for tailored advice and partnering • Raise awareness of existing support staff and services through data management web pages and training • Build links with research office to point researchers to relevant support when apply for grants
  • 18.
    4. Work towardsa DM infrastructure
  • 19.
    Conclusions There isa need for support with day to day issues of creating and managing data. Data management is mostly a ‘people’ problem. Providing brief and accessible guidance, training and support to researchers will be effective in the long term.
  • 20.
    Thanks for listening  Any questions? Email: Catharine Ward - [email_address] Project website: http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/preservation/incremental/ Cambridge Dataman web pages: http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/dataman/ Project blog: http:// incrementalproject.wordpress.com / Twitter: JISCincremental