Check the ICC Anti Corruption Report of 2012 which Srinivasan tried his best to hide & got it out of records from ICC.

1. A.C.S.U.
ICC Management Meeting
23 January 2012

2. ACSU Objectives
 Provide corruption free and secure environment for
international cricket.
 Raise awareness of players, support personnel and
Match Officials to the threat posed by ‘fixers’, and of their
responsibilities.
 Maintain and enhance the ACSU database.
 To further enhance human and technical capability to
monitor, prevent, and investigate corrupt activity.
 Safety & Security.

3. How the ACSU fulfills the
Anti-Corruption Objectives
• Preventive measures
• Collection of Intelligence
• Inquiries & Investigation
• Operational work

4. Preventative Measures
• Raise the awareness of all Players, Support Personnel and
Match Officials to the threat posed by ‘fixers’ through the
delivery of the ACSU Education Programme.
• Ensure that the aforementioned individuals understand the
provisions of the Anti-Corruption Code, and their obligations
under it.
• Fully maintain the principles of the PMOA ‘Minimum
Standards’ to ensure a corruption-free environment.
• Monitor and maintain routine observations on suspect
individuals in and around the venues & teams hotels.

5. Stats on ACSU personnel - 2011
• Total Matches covered: 470
• Total practice sessions covered: 214
• Total nights away: 1469 (9 personnel)
• Total number of Players/support personnel/officials
that received the ACSU Education Programme: 1099

6. Collection of Intelligence (1/2)
• Maintain contact with players, support personnel,
and officials vis-à-vis reporting suspicious
approaches.
• Identify suspect individuals and gain intelligence on
their activities.
• Develop and maintain working relationships with
contacts within Law Enforcement, Government
Departments, & Intelligence Agencies.

7. Collection of Intelligence (2/2)
• Identify, cultivate & recruit suitably placed individuals
with the appropriate access to ‘targets’ and/or
information.
• Bi-annual up-skilling seminar for all ACSU personnel
to ensure that the most effective and secure methods
are utilized.
• Maintain and develop contacts within other sports
regulatory bodies to establish and determine ‘best
practice’, emerging threats, & intelligence sharing etc.

8. ACSU – Intelligence Reports 2011
• Total number of Intelligence reports: 281
• Information received (i.e. players/officials/others).
• Tasked source’s .
• Intelligence proactively sought through established
contacts.
• No. of Intel Reports in 2010 was 158

9. ACSU – Intelligence Reports 2011
SOURCE OF INFORMATION
• Players: 24
• Officials: 18
• Support staff: 25
• ACSU sources: 125
• ACSU operations: 66
• Other: 23
• TOTAL: 281

10. ACSU – Intelligence Reports 2011
TYPE OF INFORMATION
• Corrupt approach: 11
• Suspicious actions: 124
• Suspect’s activities: 67
• Technical data: 74
• Other: 5
• TOTAL: 281

11. Inquiries, Analysis, & Investigation (1/2)
• Maintain and enhance the ACSU database to continually ensure
effective data collection and analysis.
• Analysis of intelligence / information to identify modus
operandi, patterns, and potential associates.
• Assess requirements to further develop or verify intelligence /
information received, and determine any potential constraints
to achieving these requirements.
• Disseminate to, and brief appropriate ACSU personnel on the
case, and inform them of their objectives.

12. Inquiries, Analysis, & Investigation (2/2)
• Task ACSU source(s) to obtain intelligence / data as necessary.
• If necessary, Identify, Cultivate and Engage new source(s) to
acquire or elicit the required information.
• If/When appropriate, brief and liaise with Law Enforcement
and/or the relevant government agency.
• Continually evaluate and assess the inquiry / investigation as
further intelligence is received.
• Review the on-going objectives, and re-task source(s) as
required.

13. Operational work in 2011
• The ACSU is currently monitoring the activities and / or
receiving intelligence on over 100 individuals from
different countries across the world; all are actively
involved in, or closely associated with, actual or planned
corruption attempts.
• The ACSU prioritizes their objectives, and deploys resources
against the individuals (or groups) offering the greatest risk
to players and the sport.
• The following cases are examples of the work undertaken
by the ACSU:

14. Mazhar Majeed’s Indian bookie
• Identified relevant Indian number
• Subscribers details & itemized billing
• Short period of activity
• Total calls / SMS’ in & out = 322
• Calls /SMS’ in & out to Majeed’s numbers = 300

15. Suresh Raina – media photo (Shirdi) (1/3)
• ‘Notorious’ Indian bookie
photographed with Suresh Raina –
D.N.
• Arrested in 2002 & 2008 for
betting offences.
• Close associate & partner of ‘D.N.’ is ‘A.J.’
• Tied in with international betting.

16. Suresh Raina photo – ACSU inquiries (2/3)
• ‘Demand Letter’ issued to Raina.
• Sources tasked re DN & AJ.
• Operational Intel & current modus operandi
• Mobile numbers obtained.
+919320****** (AJ)
+919822****** (AJ)
+919850****** (DN)
+919324****** (DN)
• Itemized billing obtained for all mobiles.

17. Suspect identified (3/3)
• Intelligence analysis and information received cleared Raina of
any previous knowledge or association with DN.
• ACSU inquiries have
identified the person
linked to Raina that
was associating with
DN, and who ensured
his presence in the
photograph.
• Inquires are on-going
into the activities of
this person, DN & AJ.

18. ‘J.S.’ (1/3)
prominent Indian bookie!
history of match fixing allegations &
corrupt approaches to players, including:
 Hansie Cronje,
 Maurice Odumbe
 Stephen Fleming
 Chris Lewis
 Investigations undertaken by both CBI (India) and MPS (UK)

19. ‘J.S.’ (Indian bookie) – 2010 (2/3)
 JS contacts the brother of International player.
 Seeks to use brother to broker a corrupt offer.
 Offers 50 lac Rps. (US$ 96,000) for player to perform
to order in Test series.
 International player reports the approach to ACSU.
 ACSU debriefed individuals concerned.
 Intelligence & phone data sought for JS

20. ‘J.S.’ (Indian bookie) (3/3)

21. CONFIDENTIAL: Mervyn Westfield case
• Former Essex bowler Mervyn Westfield
pleaded ‘Guilty’ on 12 January 2012 to
‘Accepting or obtaining Corrupt payment’ for
his action's in the Essex v. Durham Pro40
match in Sept 2009.
• ACSU involved from the outset of the Essex
police investigation into Westfield (and
‘foreign’ player Danish Kaneria).
• ACSU provided intelligence to the police, and
identified for them the individual (A.B. –
photo taken in Sri Lanka in 2011) linked
directly to the Indian bookies.

22. SB (1/4)
• Late 2009 – Suspect individual photographed in
India by RSM
• Photo circulated to all RSM’s
• Early 2010 – Individual observed in Bangladesh
and identified as SB. The male with him was
subsequently identified as ex-ICL player ‘B.R.Y.’
• The individual behind two of the corrupt
approaches reported in 2010 was subsequently
identified as SB.

23. SB – CWC2011 (2/4)
T.H. CWC player
B.R.Y.
 Players subsequently
instructed by the ACSU to
have no further meetings
with these individuals.
A.Z.
 SB’s activities were closely
monitored during CWC2011;
he and his associates made
several attempts to approach
players.

24. SB (3/4)
• Proactive Intelligence gathering:
• Personal data, travel & business activities
• Covert observations – Sri Lanka 2011
• Mobile phones identified
+9195*****469
+9193*****576
+9199*****831
+9186*****363
+9191*****124
Itemized billing obtained &
analyzed
• Individual identified close to SB, and recruited to provide
information to ACSU.

25. SB (4/4)
• Intelligence received that SB was travelling to UAE for Pakistan /
Sri Lanka series in Nov 2011.
• ACSU met with both squads and match officials.
• Photo of SB shown and briefed on potential
threat.
• Intelligence confirmed that SB flew from Mumbai to Dubai on 2
November 2011.
• 2 players approached but recognized SB from the briefing and
refused his hospitality

26. Corrupt approach
£200,000 per televised
match (2010)
Cricket Agent
A.S.K.
V.G.
Associate:
1. A.S.K. brokered Agent
meeting, and
2. Arranged ‘fixed’ matches
between Indian club team
& Associate team.
Ad-hoc contact. A.S.K. took team
to UK in July 2011 for friendlies.
V.G. (1/2)

27. V.G. (2/2)
H.S. 1 H.S. 2
• Contact during IPL4
• Sought information
& meeting
Before & after call/SMS ‘ to HS1, HS2
was in contact with V.G.

28. ‘The Suspects’
‘N.M.’ ‘R.A.’ ‘R.S.’ ‘S.K.’
‘D.P.’ ‘K.B.’ ‘P.T.’

29. ‘D.P.’ & ‘N.M.’ (1/3)
• DP first observed in London during
World Twenty20 in 2009.
• NM was with DP purporting to be his
girlfriend
• They stayed in the Royal Garden Hotel,
as did certain teams, and continually
attempted to approach players
• Subsequent ACSU inquiries established
their identity and other details.
• Although ACSU obtained further intelligence on both subjects
the extent of their activities only became apparent in 2010.

30. ‘D.P.’ & ‘N.M.’ (2/3)
• ACSU identified mobile numbers for each (Indian
Pakistan & UK). Numbers were regularly changed.
• Itemized billing obtained and, where possible, on
an on-going basis.
• Apparent that NM was in contact with certain players, and that
DP was potentially less important.
• ACSU inquiries ascertained that NM was clearly using her
charms (‘the honey trap’) in an attempt to corrupt players.
• Analysis of the billing data confirmed that she was in contact
with a number of suspected corruptors already of ACSU
interest, and known bookies in both India & Dubai.

31. ‘D.P.’ & ‘N.M.’ (3/3)
• ACSU worked closely with the Indian police on
NM during CWC 2011 – observation and
surveillance work undertaken.
• As anticipated, NM made a corrupt approach
during the CWC. The player reported to the
ACSU who briefed him on the action to take;
any compromise was successfully avoided.
• ACSU interviewed other players known to have had contact
with NM. Satisfactory explanations were received and where
possible verified.
• Inquiries continue into NM’s activities and further action is
currently being discussed with the Indian police authorities.

32. ‘K.B.’ (1/2)
• Indian national KB was first observed in
Sri Lanka in late 2009.
• Actions raised suspicion but nothing
specific.
• During 2010 ACSU sought further
information on KB, inc. phone data.
• KB obtained UK visa in 2010, and was monitored in London
during Eng / India series in 2011.

33. K.B. – Crowne Plaza, London 25.07.2011 (2/2)

34. ‘P.T.’
• Indian national PT was first observed in Sri
Lanka in late 2009.
• As with previous individuals his actions
raised suspicion but nothing specific.
• During 2010 ACSU sought further
information on PT, inc. phone data for
both India & SL numbers.
• PT was further observed by RSM’s at subsequent matches;
regularly using his mobile but nothing specific could be
pinpointed at that time.

35. ‘R.A.’ & ‘R.S.’ (1/2)
• RA was first observed in UK during the World Twenty20 in
2009, but his identity was not established until later.
• RA and another male continually sought to meet
players both within the hotel and nearby casino’s.
• RA offered casino chips to players; further offered
to provide call girls and a ‘safe’ hotel room.
• Approaches were reported to the ACSU; inquiries
were instigated to identify RA.
• RA was subsequently identified during a series in
Sri Lanka with RS (possibly the unknown male).

36. ‘R.A.’ & ‘R.S.’ (2/2)
• The identity of each was obtained together with
other details (inc. mobile number); RA – British
national; RS – Indian national.
• Further inquires were instigated in both UK & India.
Very limited phone data could be obtained.
• On-line betting accounts for RA; small amounts.
• Only limited information could be obtained on RA
(& RS), hence couldn’t progress inquiry.
• However, through these accounts establish link
with Indian national SK.

37. ‘S.K.’
• Inquiries instigated on SK. Subsequently observed in Sri Lanka
& further intel obtained both in SL & India.
• In 2010 SK initiated a potentially corrupt
approach to a player.
• ACSU briefed player on action to take &
avoided potential compromise.
• ACSU monitored SK although limited intelligence was
forthcoming.

38. The Suspects - Connected!

39. Cricket’s / ACSU’s unique circumstances
• In the regulated markets its easy to pinpoint corruption
through betting patterns (football, tennis, darts etc.)
• Countries with the regulated markets have the necessary
laws in place.

40. Cricket’s / ACSU’s unique circumstances
• The ACSU has to start an inquiry / investigation
based on an Intelligence Report or a situation.
• In the un-regulated market no evidence trace is left
behind by betting syndicates.
• Remember the output of the ACSU is derived from
only 9 people.

41. Work other than Anti-Corruption
• Increasing physical security related work –
VSR’s & SP’s.
• Regulatory work.
• Bi-annual seminars.
• Drawing up of RSM schedules. (ICC, IPL etc.)
• The usual budget / administration work.