Download to read offline
GROUP A PRESENTATION presentation-1.pptx
- 1.
- 2. What is theprimary difference between aerobic and anaerobic biological waste water treatment processes and how do the differences impact the treatment efficiency and products
- 3. Aerobic and anaerobicbiological waste water treatment processes • Aerobic decomposition, also known as aerobic respiration, occurs in the presence of oxygen. It is primarily used in wastewater treatment to break down organic matter into simpler, stable compounds. • Anaerobic decomposition, or anaerobic respiration, occurs in the absence of oxygen. It is commonly used for high-strength wastewater and sludge digestion, producing biogas as a byproduct.
- 4. Differences Between Aerobicand Anaerobic Treatment Factor Aerobic Treatment Anaerobic Treatment Oxygen Requirement Requires oxygen (O₂) Operates without oxygen Microbial Activity Aerobic bacteria rapidly break down organic matter Anaerobic bacteria slowly degrade organic matter Energy Production High energy yield (36–38 ATP/glucose) Low energy yield (2–6 ATP/glucose)
- 5. Continuation….. Factor Aerobic TreatmentAnaerobic Treatment Treatment Speed Fast (6–24 hours retention time) Slow (2–30 days retention time) Sludge Production High (40–60% of organic matter converted to biomass) Low (5–20% converted to biomass) Final Byproducts CO₂ and water (H₂O) Methane (CH₄), CO₂, and hydrogen sulfide (H₂S)
- 6. Continuation….. Factor Aerobic TreatmentAnaerobic Treatment Odor Issues Minimal Potential odor (H₂S, NH₃) Nutrient Removal Good removal of nitrogen and phosphorus Limited removal of nitrogen and phosphorus Energy Recovery No energy recovery Produces biogas (CH₄) for energy
- 7. Impact on TreatmentEfficiency and products
- 8. Organic Matter RemovalEfficiency (COD & BOD Reduction) • Aerobic Treatment: • Removes 85–95% of BOD and 70–90% of COD. • Organic matter is completely oxidized into CO₂ and H₂O. • Anaerobic Treatment: • Removes 50–80% of BOD and 40–75% of COD. • Organic matter is partially broken down, leaving some residual pollutants. • Often requires post-treatment with an aerobic process to further reduce COD/BOD.
- 9. Energy Requirements andRecovery • Aerobic Treatment: • High energy consumption due to aeration. • No energy recovery—all energy is lost as heat. • Anaerobic Treatment: • Low energy consumption (no aeration required). • Produces methane (CH₄) biogas, which can be used for electricity generation or heating.
- 10. Treatment Speed &Retention Time • Aerobic Treatment: • Faster treatment (6–24 hours). • Suitable for high-flow, low-strength wastewater (municipal sewage). • Anaerobic Treatment: • Slower process (2–30 days). • Used for high-strength wastewater (industrial effluents, food processing waste).
- 11. Byproduct and EnvironmentalImpact • Aerobic Treatment: • Produces CO₂, which contributes to carbon emissions. • Minimal odor issues. • Anaerobic Treatment: • Produces methane (CH₄), CO₂, and H₂S. • Methane is a renewable energy source, but if released untreated, it is a strong greenhouse gas. • Potential odor issues (H₂S, NH₃).
- 12. Compare and contrastthe use of Anaerobic, Facultative, and Aerobic Ponds for Wastewater Treatment
- 13. Anaerobic, Facultative, andAerobic Ponds for Wastewater Treatment • Anaerobic ponds operate without oxygen, relying on anaerobic bacteria to break down organic matter through fermentation and methanogenesis. • Facultative ponds operate with both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, supporting facultative bacteria that can survive in either environment. • Aerobic or maturation ponds serve as the final treatment stage, focusing on pathogen removal and polishing the effluent before discharge or reuse.
- 14. Comparison of Anaerobic,Facultative, and Aerobic Ponds Feature Anaerobic Pond Facultative Pond Aerobic (Maturation) Pond Oxygen Requirement None Partial High Microbial Process Anaerobic Mixed (Facultative) Aerobic BOD Removal 40–60% 70–90% 80–95%
- 15. Continuation….. Feature Anaerobic PondFacultative Pond Aerobic (Maturation) Pond Pathogen Removal Low Moderate High (99%) Sludge Production High Moderate Low Odor Issues High Moderate Low
- 16. Continuation….. Feature Anaerobic PondFacultative Pond Aerobic (Maturation) Pond Energy Requirement None None None (natural aeration) Retention Time 1–5 days 5–30 days 10–20 days Best Used For High-strength wastewater (pre-treatment) Secondary treatment Final polishing & pathogen removal
- 17. discuss the advantages,disadvantages, and suitability for the different types of waste water
- 18. Domestic (Municipal) Wastewater Source:Households, offices, schools, hospitals Main Contaminants: Organic matter, nutrients (Nitrogen, Phosphorus), pathogens, and suspended solids
- 19. Advantages • Easier totreat compared to industrial wastewater – well-established treatment technologies exist (e.g., activated sludge). Recyclable – Treated effluent can be used for irrigation, landscaping, or groundwater recharge. Biodegradable – High organic matter content makes biological treatment effective.
- 20. Disadvantages • Contains pathogens– Needs disinfection before reuse or discharge. High nitrogen & phosphorus – Can cause eutrophication if discharged untreated. Large volume – Requires large-scale treatment plants.
- 21. Suitability & TreatmentOptions • Best suited for biological treatment (activated sludge, lagoons, biofilters). Suitable for reuse in agriculture, irrigation, and industrial cooling after secondary or tertiary treatment.
- 22. Industrial Wastewater • Source:Factories, power plants, refineries, chemical & pharmaceutical industries Main Contaminants: Heavy metals, toxic chemicals, high COD/BOD, oil & grease
- 23. Advantages • Can bepre-treated at source – Reduces load on municipal treatment plants. Possibility of resource recovery – Metals, chemicals, and water can be reclaimed in some industries. Advanced treatment options available – Technologies like reverse osmosis and chemical oxidation can handle toxic waste.
- 24. Disadvantages • Highly variablecomposition – Requires customized treatment solutions. May contain hazardous chemicals – Conventional biological treatment may not work. Expensive treatment – Requires advanced treatment systems like membranes, oxidation, and adsorption.
- 25. Suitability & TreatmentOptions • Best suited for industries that can install pre-treatment systems before discharge. Common treatment methods: Chemical coagulation, oxidation, biological treatment, membrane filtration.
- 26. Stormwater (Urban Runoff) •Source: Rainwater flowing over roads, parking lots, and buildings Main Contaminants: Oil, grease, heavy metals, sediments, trash
- 27. Advantages • Can becollected and stored for reuse – Can recharge groundwater or supply non-potable water. Can be treated using natural methods – Bioswales, rain gardens, and constructed wetlands are effective. Reduces flooding – Proper management prevents urban flooding and erosion.
- 28. Disadvantages • Highly variablequality – Contaminant levels depend on urban activities and rainfall. Difficult to collect and treat – Large drainage systems are required. High sediment load – Can clog waterways and infrastructure.
- 29. Suitability & TreatmentOptions • Best suited for green infrastructure solutions (permeable pavements, rain gardens, retention ponds). Common treatment methods: Sedimentation, filtration, constructed wetlands, oil separation.
- 30. Agricultural Wastewater • Source:Farms, livestock operations, irrigation runoff Main Contaminants: Nitrogen, phosphorus, pesticides, animal waste
- 31. Advantages • Can bereused – Treated agricultural wastewater can be used for irrigation. Nutrient-rich – Proper treatment can recover nitrogen and phosphorus as fertilizers. Natural treatment options available – Constructed wetlands and lagoons can treat wastewater cost-effectively.
- 32. Disadvantages • High nutrientload – Causes algal blooms and eutrophication in nearby water bodies. Pathogens from animal waste – Needs disinfection to prevent disease spread. Seasonal variations – Wastewater flow depends on rainfall and farming activities.
- 33. Suitability & TreatmentOptions • Best suited for reuse in irrigation, constructed wetlands, and biological treatment. Common treatment methods: Sedimentation, anaerobic digestion, wetlands, nutrient removal.
- 34. Medical (Hospital) Wastewater •Source: Hospitals, clinics, laboratories Main Contaminants: Pharmaceuticals, pathogens, blood, chemical disinfectants
- 35. Advantages • Can betreated separately – Reduces risk of mixing hazardous waste with municipal wastewater. New technologies available – Advanced oxidation and membrane filtration can remove pharmaceuticals. Prevention of disease spread – Proper treatment ensures public health safety.
- 36. Disadvantages • Contains harmfulsubstances – Pathogens, drug residues, and chemicals need specialized treatment. Requires strict regulations – Discharge must meet public health and environmental standards. Expensive to treat – Advanced technologies like UV, ozone, and nanofiltration increase costs.
- 37. Suitability & TreatmentOptions • Best suited for separate collection and on-site treatment before discharge. Common treatment methods: Chemical disinfection, membrane filtration, advanced oxidation, incineration for solid waste.
- 38. Mining Wastewater (AcidMine Drainage - AMD) • Source: Mining operations, metal extraction Main Contaminants: Acidic water, heavy metals (arsenic, lead, mercury), sulfates
- 39. Advantages • Metals canbe recovered – Some treatment methods allow valuable metals to be extracted. Passive treatment options available – Constructed wetlands and limestone reactors can treat AMD naturally. Reduces long-term environmental damage – Proper treatment prevents acidification of rivers and lakes.
- 40. Disadvantages • Highly acidic(low pH) – Requires strong neutralization before further treatment. Toxic heavy metals – Can bioaccumulate in the food chain. Long-term contamination – Some mining sites require treatment for decades.
- 41. Suitability & TreatmentOptions • Best suited for chemical and biological treatment for pH correction and metal removal. Common treatment methods: Lime neutralization, sulfate reduction, passive wetlands, reverse osmosis.