This document appears to be a report card or progress report for a 10th grade class in Informatics at an educational institution. It lists 27 students and their grades in various categories like classwork, projects, exams for four periods throughout the year. Most students received passing grades overall, with a few failing certain periods. The report also includes totals for how many students passed or failed each period and overall attendance statistics for the year.

1. INSTITUCIÓN EDUCATIVA LEOCADIO SALAZAR
GRADO 10B ASIGNATURA INFORMÁTICA DOCENTE MIRELLA CUARTAS RINCON 2012
I PERIODO 16 ENE-30 MARZO II PERIODO 9 ABRIL-29 JUNIO III PERIODO. 30 JUL-5 OCTUB IV PERIODO. 15 OCTU-30 NOV AUSENTISMO IN
# ESTUDIANTES: APELLIDOS Y NOMBRES
ES CR P CL RE NPA NFR ES CR PI CL RE NPA NFR ES CR PI CL RE NPA NFR ES CR PI CL RE NPA NFR I II III IV
FINAL
1 ACEVEDO CANO DANIELA 5.0 3.0 5.0 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 3.2 3.2 3.7 4.0 4.0 3.1 3.7 1 2
2 BARRETO VALENCIA BRAHIAM ALEXIS 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.8 5.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 6 8
3 BUITRAGO MORENO LUISA 3.0 3.0 5.0 3.4 3.6 5.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.2 3.2 1.3 5.0 5.0 4.7 4.0 3 4 4 2
4 CAJAS GARCIA CRISTIAM 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4
5 CASTRO OSORIO ANDRÉS FELIPE 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.3 4.3 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5
6 FRANCO VEGA NATALIA 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.1 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.9 5.0 3.7 5.0 5.0 0.0 3.4 6 2 4
7 GIRALDO RODRIGUEZ KAREM 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.8 3.2 3.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 2.5 1.8 2.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 3.1 3.5 7
8 GOMÉZ ALZATE JUAN FELIPE 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.7 4.7 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.7 5.0 5.0 4.4 4.5 8 2
9 ITAGAKI MARIN KATSU TSUGU 3.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.4 2.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.3 4.3 9 2 2
10 LISCANO MARULANDA DIDIER HERNAN 2.0 4.0 5.0 3.3 3.6 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.3 4.1 4.1 3.7 5.0 5.0 4.7 5.0 10 2
11 LONDOÑO PINEDA ANGELICA 5.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.2 4.5 4.5 4.0 3.4 2.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 5.0 5.0 4.2 4.5 11
12 LÓPEZ CASTAÑO MAIKOL 5.0 1.0 4.0 2.7 3.2 3.2 5.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 2.8 2.8 3.7 5.0 1.0 3.1 3.2 12 2
13 LOPEZ LEÓN SANTIAGO 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.3 4.6 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.4 4.6 13 2
14 MATEUS MARIN SEBASTIAN 1.0 5.0 4.0 3.9 3.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 2.5 4.3 4.3 4.0 5.0 4.0 3.5 4.1 14 2
15 PELAEZ RIOS DIEGO FERNANDO 1.0 4.0 1.0 0.2 1.6 1.6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.3 4.1 4.1 3.7 5.0 3.0 3.1 3.7 15 4 4
16 RODRIGUEZ GARCIA DAYAM 4.0 1.0 4.0 3.1 3.0 3.0 4.5 5.0 1.0 4.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 5.0 1.0 4.7 3.4 16 2
17 RODRIGUEZ MARIN MANUEL FERNANDO 5.0 1.0 4.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.0 1.0 5.0 4.2 3.3 3.3 5.0 5.0 0.0 4.7 3.7 17 4 4
18 RUBIO CASTAÑO GERSON DAVID 1.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 3.3 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.7 5.0 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 18 2
19 SALINAS HERRERA SEBASTIAN 2.5 0.0 0.6 2.0 3.7 1.0 1.0 3.7 2.3 19 6
20 SUAREZ LÓPEZ JOSÉ ARLEY 1.0 5.0 5.0 4.2 3.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.5 5.0 5.0 4.3 5.0 20 2
21 TABORDA BUENO LEDES NAYDER 3.0 1.0 1.0 2.2 1.8 1.8 2.5 1.0 1.0 3.3 1.9 2.0 2.5 5.0 3.0 3.4 3.5 21
22 TORRES RINCÓN KELLYN TATIANA 4.0 5.0 4.0 3.8 4.2 4.5 2.0 5.0 1.7 3.0 2.9 2.9 3.7 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.4 22
23 VALDEZ MARTINEZ JUAN MANUEL 1.0 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 2.8 3.9 3.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.1 5.0 23 4 4 2
24 VALENCIA MATEUS MARIA FERNANDA 3.0 4.0 5.0 4.4 4.1 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1.3 5.0 4.0 3.1 3.3 24 4 4
25 VELEZ RIOS JULIAN ANDRES 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.8 1.0 2.5 5.0 0.0 4.7 3.0 25 8
26 VELEZ ROJAS JONATHAN 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.2 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.4 5.0 26
27 ESCOBAR CANO KAREN DAYANA 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.2 4.8 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
CR= COMENTARIOS EN LA RED
PI= PROYECTO INTEGRADO PERDIERON 2 9 % PERDIERON 7 27 % PERDIERON 2 7 % PERDIERON PERDIERON 2012
ES= EVALUACIÓN METODOLOGÍA SABER GANARON 20 91 % GANARON 19 73 % GANARON 25 93 % GANARON
CL= COMPENDIO LECTURAS. RE: RECUPERA TOTAL 22 100 % TOTAL 26 100 % TOTAL 27 100 % TOTAL
NPA= NOTA DEL PERI CON ACTIVI DE APOYO
NFR= NOTA FINAL CON RECUPERACIÓN