SlideShare a Scribd company logo
From Astley correspondence (sample of 160 /c FAS v PFAS dx)
CNS Rank 0-3 4-5 6-10 11-15 15-19
1 (normal) 70% 33% 6% 3% 0%
2 13% 11% 13% 10% 0%
3 17% 56% 82% 86% 100%
Total N 46 27 55 29 3
But how do the kids /c CNS rank of 1 merit a FAS v PFAS dx?

More Related Content

More from ebredberg

Course Outline
Course OutlineCourse Outline
Course Outline
ebredberg
 
CYSN Framework For Action
CYSN Framework For Action CYSN Framework For Action
CYSN Framework For Action
ebredberg
 
ASBC FEAT Hewko Interpretation
ASBC FEAT Hewko InterpretationASBC FEAT Hewko Interpretation
ASBC FEAT Hewko Interpretation
ebredberg
 
Judge Koenigsberg Re Hewkov Bc 11 03 06 1
Judge Koenigsberg Re Hewkov Bc 11 03 06 1Judge Koenigsberg Re Hewkov Bc 11 03 06 1
Judge Koenigsberg Re Hewkov Bc 11 03 06 1
ebredberg
 
Supporting Meaningful Collaboration with Parents
Supporting Meaningful Collaboration with ParentsSupporting Meaningful Collaboration with Parents
Supporting Meaningful Collaboration with Parents
ebredberg
 
Science Research
Science ResearchScience Research
Science Research
ebredberg
 
Groups
Groups Groups
Groups
ebredberg
 
Gifted (Maurice)
Gifted (Maurice)Gifted (Maurice)
Gifted (Maurice)
ebredberg
 
Fred's IEP
Fred's IEPFred's IEP
Fred's IEP
ebredberg
 
Class 8 Vis and Hearing
Class 8 Vis and HearingClass 8 Vis and Hearing
Class 8 Vis and Hearing
ebredberg
 
Class 6 (Behaviour And Mh)
Class 6 (Behaviour And Mh)Class 6 (Behaviour And Mh)
Class 6 (Behaviour And Mh)
ebredberg
 
Class 7 (Asd)
Class 7 (Asd)Class 7 (Asd)
Class 7 (Asd)
ebredberg
 
Class 5 (Fasd Ppt)
Class 5 (Fasd Ppt)Class 5 (Fasd Ppt)
Class 5 (Fasd Ppt)
ebredberg
 
Class 4 (Adhd)
Class 4 (Adhd)Class 4 (Adhd)
Class 4 (Adhd)
ebredberg
 
Class 3
Class 3Class 3
Class 3
ebredberg
 
Class 2
Class 2 Class 2
Class 2
ebredberg
 
Joint Statement On Dyslexia
Joint Statement On DyslexiaJoint Statement On Dyslexia
Joint Statement On Dyslexia
ebredberg
 
Joint Statement On Dyslexia
Joint Statement On DyslexiaJoint Statement On Dyslexia
Joint Statement On Dyslexia
ebredberg
 
Resource Worksheet
Resource WorksheetResource Worksheet
Resource Worksheet
ebredberg
 
IEP Template
IEP TemplateIEP Template
IEP Template
ebredberg
 

More from ebredberg (20)

Course Outline
Course OutlineCourse Outline
Course Outline
 
CYSN Framework For Action
CYSN Framework For Action CYSN Framework For Action
CYSN Framework For Action
 
ASBC FEAT Hewko Interpretation
ASBC FEAT Hewko InterpretationASBC FEAT Hewko Interpretation
ASBC FEAT Hewko Interpretation
 
Judge Koenigsberg Re Hewkov Bc 11 03 06 1
Judge Koenigsberg Re Hewkov Bc 11 03 06 1Judge Koenigsberg Re Hewkov Bc 11 03 06 1
Judge Koenigsberg Re Hewkov Bc 11 03 06 1
 
Supporting Meaningful Collaboration with Parents
Supporting Meaningful Collaboration with ParentsSupporting Meaningful Collaboration with Parents
Supporting Meaningful Collaboration with Parents
 
Science Research
Science ResearchScience Research
Science Research
 
Groups
Groups Groups
Groups
 
Gifted (Maurice)
Gifted (Maurice)Gifted (Maurice)
Gifted (Maurice)
 
Fred's IEP
Fred's IEPFred's IEP
Fred's IEP
 
Class 8 Vis and Hearing
Class 8 Vis and HearingClass 8 Vis and Hearing
Class 8 Vis and Hearing
 
Class 6 (Behaviour And Mh)
Class 6 (Behaviour And Mh)Class 6 (Behaviour And Mh)
Class 6 (Behaviour And Mh)
 
Class 7 (Asd)
Class 7 (Asd)Class 7 (Asd)
Class 7 (Asd)
 
Class 5 (Fasd Ppt)
Class 5 (Fasd Ppt)Class 5 (Fasd Ppt)
Class 5 (Fasd Ppt)
 
Class 4 (Adhd)
Class 4 (Adhd)Class 4 (Adhd)
Class 4 (Adhd)
 
Class 3
Class 3Class 3
Class 3
 
Class 2
Class 2 Class 2
Class 2
 
Joint Statement On Dyslexia
Joint Statement On DyslexiaJoint Statement On Dyslexia
Joint Statement On Dyslexia
 
Joint Statement On Dyslexia
Joint Statement On DyslexiaJoint Statement On Dyslexia
Joint Statement On Dyslexia
 
Resource Worksheet
Resource WorksheetResource Worksheet
Resource Worksheet
 
IEP Template
IEP TemplateIEP Template
IEP Template
 

From astley correspondence2

  • 1. From Astley correspondence (sample of 160 /c FAS v PFAS dx) CNS Rank 0-3 4-5 6-10 11-15 15-19 1 (normal) 70% 33% 6% 3% 0% 2 13% 11% 13% 10% 0% 3 17% 56% 82% 86% 100% Total N 46 27 55 29 3 But how do the kids /c CNS rank of 1 merit a FAS v PFAS dx?