This Practice Direction supplements the Family Procedure Rules regarding service of documents out of the jurisdiction. It provides guidance on serving documents in other EU member states according to the Service Regulation, and in Commonwealth states and British overseas territories. It also specifies time periods for responding to applications and notices served outside of the UK jurisdiction.
The document amends prior regulations related to legal aid in England and Wales. It makes transitional provisions for applying cost rules when a party receives early legal services and later receives legal aid for the same case. It also modifies a prior regulation regarding damages-based agreements to update a reference from an old legal services system to the current legal aid system. The amendments take effect on April 1, 2013 to coincide with the earlier regulations.
Transitional and saving provisions)(amendment) regulations 2013PAINalison
The document amends prior regulations related to legal aid in England and Wales. It makes transitional provisions for applying cost protection regulations to cases that began with public funding and continue with legal aid. It also modifies a reference in damages agreement regulations to refer to legal aid arrangements rather than the prior community legal service. The amendments take effect on April 1, 2013 to coincide with the prior regulations.
The health and social care act 2012 (commencement no. 5, transitional, saving...PAINalison
This document outlines the commencement dates of various provisions in the Health and Social Care Act 2012 related to the regulation and licensing of healthcare providers in England. Key dates include April 1st, 2013 for provisions related to Monitor's licensing powers over NHS foundation trusts and July 1st, 2013 for provisions giving Monitor powers to modify license conditions. It also describes transitional modifications to sections of the Act to facilitate the staged commencement of regulatory powers.
The children, schools and families act 2010 (commencement no. 3) order 2013PAINalison
This order brings a section of the Children, Schools and Families Act 2010 into force on April 15th, 2013. Specifically, it puts section 8 of that Act into effect, which inserts section 14B into the Children Act 2004. Section 14B gives local safeguarding children boards the power to request information from any person or body to supply specified information to the board or another entity. The order was made by the Secretary of State for Education and outlines the relevant statutory instruments and explanatory notes.
Adoption and special guardianship data packPAINalison
This document provides data on adoption and special guardianship in England from 2007-2010. It summarizes national trends and variations between local authorities. Key points include: the number of children adopted from care increased since 1999 but has fallen slightly in recent years; locally adoption rates vary from 1-10% of looked after children; most adopted children are under 5 while special guardianship is more common for older children; statutory timelines for adoption are often not met, especially for black children and those in London. The document aims to help local authorities evaluate their performance and identify areas for improvement.
The Adoption Register is a database and staff team that works to match children waiting to be adopted with approved prospective adopters. It stores details of over 4,000 children and many approved families. When a child's local agency cannot find a match within 3 months, or a family has not been matched locally after 3 months, they are referred to the Register which searches for potential matches among all referred children and families. It then provides brief details to agencies to consider further. The Register aims to increase opportunities for all children and families to find a suitable adoption match.
This Practice Direction supplements the Family Procedure Rules regarding service of documents out of the jurisdiction. It provides guidance on serving documents in other EU member states according to the Service Regulation, and in Commonwealth states and British overseas territories. It also specifies time periods for responding to applications and notices served outside of the UK jurisdiction.
The document amends prior regulations related to legal aid in England and Wales. It makes transitional provisions for applying cost rules when a party receives early legal services and later receives legal aid for the same case. It also modifies a prior regulation regarding damages-based agreements to update a reference from an old legal services system to the current legal aid system. The amendments take effect on April 1, 2013 to coincide with the earlier regulations.
Transitional and saving provisions)(amendment) regulations 2013PAINalison
The document amends prior regulations related to legal aid in England and Wales. It makes transitional provisions for applying cost protection regulations to cases that began with public funding and continue with legal aid. It also modifies a reference in damages agreement regulations to refer to legal aid arrangements rather than the prior community legal service. The amendments take effect on April 1, 2013 to coincide with the prior regulations.
The health and social care act 2012 (commencement no. 5, transitional, saving...PAINalison
This document outlines the commencement dates of various provisions in the Health and Social Care Act 2012 related to the regulation and licensing of healthcare providers in England. Key dates include April 1st, 2013 for provisions related to Monitor's licensing powers over NHS foundation trusts and July 1st, 2013 for provisions giving Monitor powers to modify license conditions. It also describes transitional modifications to sections of the Act to facilitate the staged commencement of regulatory powers.
The children, schools and families act 2010 (commencement no. 3) order 2013PAINalison
This order brings a section of the Children, Schools and Families Act 2010 into force on April 15th, 2013. Specifically, it puts section 8 of that Act into effect, which inserts section 14B into the Children Act 2004. Section 14B gives local safeguarding children boards the power to request information from any person or body to supply specified information to the board or another entity. The order was made by the Secretary of State for Education and outlines the relevant statutory instruments and explanatory notes.
Adoption and special guardianship data packPAINalison
This document provides data on adoption and special guardianship in England from 2007-2010. It summarizes national trends and variations between local authorities. Key points include: the number of children adopted from care increased since 1999 but has fallen slightly in recent years; locally adoption rates vary from 1-10% of looked after children; most adopted children are under 5 while special guardianship is more common for older children; statutory timelines for adoption are often not met, especially for black children and those in London. The document aims to help local authorities evaluate their performance and identify areas for improvement.
The Adoption Register is a database and staff team that works to match children waiting to be adopted with approved prospective adopters. It stores details of over 4,000 children and many approved families. When a child's local agency cannot find a match within 3 months, or a family has not been matched locally after 3 months, they are referred to the Register which searches for potential matches among all referred children and families. It then provides brief details to agencies to consider further. The Register aims to increase opportunities for all children and families to find a suitable adoption match.
Adoption access to intermediary servicesPAINalison
This document provides guidance for adoption workers on providing services to adopted adults seeking access to their birth records or information from adoption records for pre-commencement adoptions. It outlines the relevant legislation, research findings, and procedures for providing birth record counseling and access to adoption records. Key points include who is eligible for services, the counseling process, responding promptly to requests, and qualifications for counselors.
This practice direction provides guidance on applying the Maintenance Regulation between EU member states, which replaces previous international agreements on maintenance orders. It discusses transitional cases and the relationship between the Maintenance Regulation and prior conventions. Applications for recognition and enforcement of orders from EU countries will follow the rules in the Maintenance Regulation.
This document contains a Family Mediation Information and Assessment (MIAM) form that must be completed before applying to a family court for certain orders relating to children or financial remedies. The form has two parts: Part 1 is for determining if a valid exemption to attending a MIAM applies. Part 2 is for when a family mediator determines a valid exemption or that mediation is not suitable. The form provides information on the MIAM process and exemptions, and must be signed in the appropriate section by either the applicant/representative or family mediator.
This document summarizes existing practice directions that will continue to apply to family court proceedings after April 6, 2011, when the new Family Procedure Rules 2010 come into effect. It lists the existing practice directions in an annex, along with any title or numbering changes and updated references to rules necessitated by the new rules. It also states that one existing practice direction on applications for scientific parentage testing will continue to apply under the new rules.
This document is a form used in family court proceedings in England and Wales to provide information about mediation. It requires information about whether the applicant attended a required Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting, the reason if they did not attend, and signatures from the applicant's legal representative and the mediator if applicable. The form has four parts that must be filled out depending on whether the applicant attended the meeting or qualifies for an exception.
This document outlines functions of the court that can and cannot be performed by a single justice of the peace in family court proceedings. It provides tables listing specific court rules and the nature of functions that single justices can and cannot perform. For example, a single justice cannot make final orders on residence, placement, adoption or care, but can discharge other family court functions outlined in the rules.
This document summarizes existing practice directions that will continue to apply to family court proceedings after April 6, 2011 when the new Family Procedure Rules 2010 come into effect. It lists the existing practice directions in an annex, along with any title or numbering changes and updates to rule references needed due to the new rules. It also states that one existing practice direction on determining parentage through scientific tests will apply using the new rules for other applications.
This Practice Direction provides transitional arrangements for proceedings started before April 6, 2011 under the previous family court rules. It explains that for existing proceedings, where a step was taken under the previous rules it will continue under those rules, but new steps on or after April 6, 2011 will be taken according to the new Family Procedure Rules (FPR). The Practice Direction also notes some exceptions, such as that the Overriding Objective in Part 1 of the FPR will apply to all existing proceedings from April 6, 2011 onwards.
This Practice Direction supplements Family Procedure Rule 35.2 and concerns applications for consent orders regarding financial remedies. It states that any such application, supporting evidence of a party's consent, or correspondence consenting to an order, must be in English or accompanied by an English translation. The applications and evidence must use English or include English translations.
The document provides guidance on tracing the whereabouts of a maintenance payer who lives overseas in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or South Africa when their address is unknown. It outlines that the court can request that the authorities in those countries make inquiries to locate the payer. It describes the procedure to follow which includes completing a questionnaire in duplicate and lodging it with the district judge along with an undertaking that any address received will only be used for the proceedings.
The document provides guidance on tracing the whereabouts of a maintenance payer who lives overseas in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or South Africa when their address is unknown. It outlines that the court can request that the authorities in those countries make inquiries to locate the payer. It describes the procedure to follow which includes completing a questionnaire in duplicate and lodging it with the district judge along with an undertaking that any address received will only be used for the proceedings.
This document outlines procedures for reciprocal enforcement of maintenance orders between countries. It provides details on notifying payment methods, requirements for transmitting orders to other countries, and certifying copies of orders to be enforced abroad. Specific procedures are defined for the Republic of Ireland, Hague Convention countries, and specified US states. The annexes modify the rules for transmitting orders to each location.
This Practice Direction supplements Part 33 of the Family Procedure Rules (FPR) and provides guidance on enforcing undertakings given in family court proceedings. It distinguishes between undertakings to do or abstain from doing an act, and undertakings for the payment of money. For non-payment undertakings, it states that the person may be committed for contempt of court if they had the means to pay but refused or neglected to pay. For other undertakings, it provides that the person may be committed for contempt if they break any promises made to the court in the undertaking. The Direction includes model wording to be included on undertakings regarding the consequences of non-compliance.
This Practice Direction provides guidance on applications made under various regulations and conventions relating to the registration, recognition, and non-recognition of family court judgments and orders from other jurisdictions. It specifies the required forms and evidence for different types of applications, such as applications for registration of orders under the Council Regulation or 1996 Hague Convention, or applications for recognition or non-recognition of judgments. The guidance addresses evidence requirements for different scenarios, such as judgments obtained by default or applications made under specific articles of the relevant regulations.
This document summarizes the process and requirements for appeals according to Part 30 of the Family Procedure Rules. It outlines which courts appeals can be made to depending on the original deciding court. It also describes the grounds and process for obtaining permission to appeal, including submitting reasons for appeal and relevant documentation to the appeals court. Permission is required to appeal decisions of district judges or costs judges. The document provides guidance on procedures for permission hearings and reconsideration of permission refusals.
This practice direction provides guidance for citing human rights authorities and allocating cases to judges when human rights issues are involved in family court proceedings. It states that (1) any authorities cited from the European Court or Commission must be complete reports provided to the court in advance, and (2) cases involving potential declarations of incompatibility under the Human Rights Act or concerning judicial acts must be heard and determined by a High Court judge.
This practice direction provides guidance for when a party informs the court of a potential human rights issue under section 4 or claim for damages under section 9 of the Human Rights Act 1998. It states that the court may consider giving notice to the Crown and provide directions. Normally this would be addressed at a directions hearing. The notice must be served on the appropriate person as listed under the relevant Act and include the court's directions. The Crown may then choose to join the proceedings.
This Practice Direction supplements the Family Procedure Rules regarding costs. It outlines how the Civil Procedure Rules relating to costs apply to family court proceedings, with certain modifications. Parts 43-48 of the CPR apply, except for rules excluded under Part 28. The Practice Direction on costs supplements these rules but also excludes some sections. It provides guidance on interpreting references and costs in financial remedy proceedings.
This document provides guidance on media attendance at family court hearings in England and Wales. It supplements Rule 27.11 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010, which gives media representatives the right to attend hearings, subject to the court's discretion to exclude them on specified grounds. The document outlines the exceptions to media attendance, such as conciliation hearings, and provides guidance to courts on how to exercise their discretion to exclude media. It also provides guidance on applications to exclude media representatives and notifying media of such applications.
This document provides guidance on media attendance at family court hearings. It supplements existing family court rules regarding media presence. The guidance clarifies that media have a right to attend most types of hearings but the court has discretion to exclude them in certain situations, such as for conciliation purposes or if their presence could harm the interests of justice or a party's welfare. It provides direction on verifying media representatives' credentials and handling applications to exclude them from specific parts of proceedings.
Adoption access to intermediary servicesPAINalison
This document provides guidance for adoption workers on providing services to adopted adults seeking access to their birth records or information from adoption records for pre-commencement adoptions. It outlines the relevant legislation, research findings, and procedures for providing birth record counseling and access to adoption records. Key points include who is eligible for services, the counseling process, responding promptly to requests, and qualifications for counselors.
This practice direction provides guidance on applying the Maintenance Regulation between EU member states, which replaces previous international agreements on maintenance orders. It discusses transitional cases and the relationship between the Maintenance Regulation and prior conventions. Applications for recognition and enforcement of orders from EU countries will follow the rules in the Maintenance Regulation.
This document contains a Family Mediation Information and Assessment (MIAM) form that must be completed before applying to a family court for certain orders relating to children or financial remedies. The form has two parts: Part 1 is for determining if a valid exemption to attending a MIAM applies. Part 2 is for when a family mediator determines a valid exemption or that mediation is not suitable. The form provides information on the MIAM process and exemptions, and must be signed in the appropriate section by either the applicant/representative or family mediator.
This document summarizes existing practice directions that will continue to apply to family court proceedings after April 6, 2011, when the new Family Procedure Rules 2010 come into effect. It lists the existing practice directions in an annex, along with any title or numbering changes and updated references to rules necessitated by the new rules. It also states that one existing practice direction on applications for scientific parentage testing will continue to apply under the new rules.
This document is a form used in family court proceedings in England and Wales to provide information about mediation. It requires information about whether the applicant attended a required Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting, the reason if they did not attend, and signatures from the applicant's legal representative and the mediator if applicable. The form has four parts that must be filled out depending on whether the applicant attended the meeting or qualifies for an exception.
This document outlines functions of the court that can and cannot be performed by a single justice of the peace in family court proceedings. It provides tables listing specific court rules and the nature of functions that single justices can and cannot perform. For example, a single justice cannot make final orders on residence, placement, adoption or care, but can discharge other family court functions outlined in the rules.
This document summarizes existing practice directions that will continue to apply to family court proceedings after April 6, 2011 when the new Family Procedure Rules 2010 come into effect. It lists the existing practice directions in an annex, along with any title or numbering changes and updates to rule references needed due to the new rules. It also states that one existing practice direction on determining parentage through scientific tests will apply using the new rules for other applications.
This Practice Direction provides transitional arrangements for proceedings started before April 6, 2011 under the previous family court rules. It explains that for existing proceedings, where a step was taken under the previous rules it will continue under those rules, but new steps on or after April 6, 2011 will be taken according to the new Family Procedure Rules (FPR). The Practice Direction also notes some exceptions, such as that the Overriding Objective in Part 1 of the FPR will apply to all existing proceedings from April 6, 2011 onwards.
This Practice Direction supplements Family Procedure Rule 35.2 and concerns applications for consent orders regarding financial remedies. It states that any such application, supporting evidence of a party's consent, or correspondence consenting to an order, must be in English or accompanied by an English translation. The applications and evidence must use English or include English translations.
The document provides guidance on tracing the whereabouts of a maintenance payer who lives overseas in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or South Africa when their address is unknown. It outlines that the court can request that the authorities in those countries make inquiries to locate the payer. It describes the procedure to follow which includes completing a questionnaire in duplicate and lodging it with the district judge along with an undertaking that any address received will only be used for the proceedings.
The document provides guidance on tracing the whereabouts of a maintenance payer who lives overseas in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or South Africa when their address is unknown. It outlines that the court can request that the authorities in those countries make inquiries to locate the payer. It describes the procedure to follow which includes completing a questionnaire in duplicate and lodging it with the district judge along with an undertaking that any address received will only be used for the proceedings.
This document outlines procedures for reciprocal enforcement of maintenance orders between countries. It provides details on notifying payment methods, requirements for transmitting orders to other countries, and certifying copies of orders to be enforced abroad. Specific procedures are defined for the Republic of Ireland, Hague Convention countries, and specified US states. The annexes modify the rules for transmitting orders to each location.
This Practice Direction supplements Part 33 of the Family Procedure Rules (FPR) and provides guidance on enforcing undertakings given in family court proceedings. It distinguishes between undertakings to do or abstain from doing an act, and undertakings for the payment of money. For non-payment undertakings, it states that the person may be committed for contempt of court if they had the means to pay but refused or neglected to pay. For other undertakings, it provides that the person may be committed for contempt if they break any promises made to the court in the undertaking. The Direction includes model wording to be included on undertakings regarding the consequences of non-compliance.
This Practice Direction provides guidance on applications made under various regulations and conventions relating to the registration, recognition, and non-recognition of family court judgments and orders from other jurisdictions. It specifies the required forms and evidence for different types of applications, such as applications for registration of orders under the Council Regulation or 1996 Hague Convention, or applications for recognition or non-recognition of judgments. The guidance addresses evidence requirements for different scenarios, such as judgments obtained by default or applications made under specific articles of the relevant regulations.
This document summarizes the process and requirements for appeals according to Part 30 of the Family Procedure Rules. It outlines which courts appeals can be made to depending on the original deciding court. It also describes the grounds and process for obtaining permission to appeal, including submitting reasons for appeal and relevant documentation to the appeals court. Permission is required to appeal decisions of district judges or costs judges. The document provides guidance on procedures for permission hearings and reconsideration of permission refusals.
This practice direction provides guidance for citing human rights authorities and allocating cases to judges when human rights issues are involved in family court proceedings. It states that (1) any authorities cited from the European Court or Commission must be complete reports provided to the court in advance, and (2) cases involving potential declarations of incompatibility under the Human Rights Act or concerning judicial acts must be heard and determined by a High Court judge.
This practice direction provides guidance for when a party informs the court of a potential human rights issue under section 4 or claim for damages under section 9 of the Human Rights Act 1998. It states that the court may consider giving notice to the Crown and provide directions. Normally this would be addressed at a directions hearing. The notice must be served on the appropriate person as listed under the relevant Act and include the court's directions. The Crown may then choose to join the proceedings.
This Practice Direction supplements the Family Procedure Rules regarding costs. It outlines how the Civil Procedure Rules relating to costs apply to family court proceedings, with certain modifications. Parts 43-48 of the CPR apply, except for rules excluded under Part 28. The Practice Direction on costs supplements these rules but also excludes some sections. It provides guidance on interpreting references and costs in financial remedy proceedings.
This document provides guidance on media attendance at family court hearings in England and Wales. It supplements Rule 27.11 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010, which gives media representatives the right to attend hearings, subject to the court's discretion to exclude them on specified grounds. The document outlines the exceptions to media attendance, such as conciliation hearings, and provides guidance to courts on how to exercise their discretion to exclude media. It also provides guidance on applications to exclude media representatives and notifying media of such applications.
This document provides guidance on media attendance at family court hearings. It supplements existing family court rules regarding media presence. The guidance clarifies that media have a right to attend most types of hearings but the court has discretion to exclude them in certain situations, such as for conciliation purposes or if their presence could harm the interests of justice or a party's welfare. It provides direction on verifying media representatives' credentials and handling applications to exclude them from specific parts of proceedings.
1. Practice Direction 9A –
Application for a Financial Remedy
This Practice Direction supplements FPR Part 9
Introduction
1.1 Part 9 of the Family Procedure Rules sets out the procedure applicable to the financial proceedings that are
included in the definition of a “financial remedy”.
1.2 The procedure is applicable to a limited extent to applications for financial remedies that are heard in
magistrates’ courts (namely, those under section 35 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, paragraph 69 of
Schedule 5 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004, Part I of the Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates’ Courts Act 1978,
Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 and Schedule 6 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004). However, unless the
context otherwise requires, this Practice Direction does not apply to proceedings in a magistrates’ court.
1.3 Where an application for a financial remedy includes an application relating to land, details of any mortgagee
must be included in the application.
Pre-application protocol
2.1 The “pre-application protocol” annexed to this Direction outlines the steps parties should take to seek and
provide information from and to each other prior to the commencement of any application for a financial
remedy. The court will expect the parties to comply with the terms of the protocol.
Costs
3.1 Rule 9.27 applies in the High Court and county court. The rule requires each party to produce to the court, at
every hearing or appointment, an estimate of the costs incurred by the party up to the date of that hearing or
appointment.
3.2 The purpose of this rule is to enable the court to take account of the impact of each party’s costs liability on
their financial situations. Parties should ensure that the information contained in the estimate is as full and
accurate as possible and that any sums already paid in respect of a party’s financial remedy costs are clearly set
out. Where relevant, any liability arising from the costs of other proceedings between the parties should continue
to be referred to in the appropriate section of a party’s financial statement; any such costs should not be included
in the estimates under rule 9.27.
3.3 Rule 28.3 provides that the general rule in financial remedy proceedings is that the court will not make an
order requiring one party to pay the costs of another party. However the court may make such an order at any
stage of the proceedings where it considers it appropriate to do so because of the conduct of a party in relation to
the proceedings.
3.4 Any breach of this practice direction or the pre-application protocol annexed to it will be taken into account
by the court when deciding whether to depart from the general rule as to costs.
Procedure before the first appointment
4.1 In addition to the matters listed at rule 9.14(5), the parties should, if possible, with a view to identifying and
narrowing any issues between the parties, exchange and file with the court –
(a) a summary of the case agreed between the parties;
Jordan Publishing
www.familylaw.co.uk
2. (b) a schedule of assets agreed between the parties; and
(c) details of any directions that they seek, including, where appropriate, the name of any expert they wish
to be appointed.
4.2 Where a party is prevented from sending the details referred to in (c) above, the party should make that
information available at the first appointment.
Financial Statements and other documents
5.1 Practice Direction 22A (Written Evidence) applies to any financial statement filed in accordance with
rules 9.14 or 9.19 and to any exhibits to a financial statement. In preparing a bundle of documents to be exhibited
to or attached to a financial statement, regard must be had in particular to paragraphs 11.1 to 11.3 and 13.1 to
13.4 of that Direction. Where on account of their bulk, it is impracticable for the exhibits to a financial statement
to be retained on the court file after the First Appointment, the court may give directions as to their custody
pending further hearings.
5.2 Where the court directs a party to provide information or documents by way of reply to a questionnaire or
request by another party, the reply must be verified by a statement of truth. Unless otherwise directed, a reply to
a questionnaire or request for information and documents shall not be filed with the court.
(Part 17 and Practice Direction 17A make further provision about statements of truth)
Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) Appointment
6.1 A key element in the procedure is the Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) appointment. Rule 9.17 provides
that the FDR appointment is to be treated as a meeting held for the purposes of discussion and negotiation. Such
meetings have been developed as a means of reducing the tension which inevitably arises in family disputes and
facilitating settlement of those disputes.
6.2 In order for the FDR to be effective, parties must approach the occasion openly and without reserve. Non-
disclosure of the content of such meetings is vital and is an essential prerequisite for fruitful discussion directed to
the settlement of the dispute between the parties. The FDR appointment is an important part of the settlement
process. As a consequence of Re D (Minors) (Conciliation: Disclosure of Information) [1993] Fam 231, evidence of
anything said or of any admission made in the course of an FDR appointment will not be admissible in evidence,
except at the trial of a person for an offence committed at the appointment or in the very exceptional
circumstances indicated in Re D.
6.3 Courts will therefore expect –
(a) parties to make offers and proposals;
(b) recipients of offers and proposals to give them proper consideration; and
(c) (subject to paragraph 6.4), that parties, whether separately or together, will not seek to exclude from
consideration at the appointment any such offer or proposal.
6.4 Paragraph 6.3(c) does not apply to an offer or proposal made during alternative dispute resolution.
6.5 In order to make the most effective use of the first appointment and the FDR appointment, the legal
representatives attending those appointments will be expected to have full knowledge of the case.
6.6 The rules do not provide for FDR appointments to take place during proceedings in magistrates’ courts.
Jordan Publishing
www.familylaw.co.uk
3. (Provision relating to experts in financial remedy proceedings is contained in the Practice Direction supplementing
Part 25 of the FPR relating to Experts and Assessors in Family Proceedings)
Consent orders
7.1 Rule 9.26(1)(a) requires an application for a consent order to be accompanied by two copies of the draft
order in the terms sought, one of which must be endorsed with a statement signed by the respondent to the
application signifying the respondent’s agreement. The rule is considered to have been properly complied with if
the endorsed statement is signed by solicitors on record as acting for the respondent; but where the consent
order applied for contains undertakings, it should be signed by the party giving the undertakings as well as by that
party’s solicitor.
(Provision relating to the enforcement of undertakings is contained in the Practice Direction 33A supplementing
Part 33 of the FPR)
7.2 Rule 9.26(1)(b) requires each party to file with the court and serve on the other party a statement of
information. Where this is contained in one form, both parties must sign the statement to certify that each has
read the contents of the other’s statement.
7.3 Rule 35.2 deals with applications for a consent order in respect of a financial remedy where the parties wish
to have the content of a written mediation agreement to which the Mediation Directive applies made the subject
of a consent order.
Section 10(2) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and section 48(2) of the Civil
Partnership Act 2004
8.1 Where a respondent who has applied under section 10(2) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, or
section 48(2) of the Civil Partnership Act 2004, for the court to consider his or her financial position after a divorce
or dissolution elects not to proceed with the application, a notice of withdrawal of the application signed by the
respondent or by the respondent’s solicitor may be filed without leave of the court. In this event a formal order
dismissing or striking out the application is unnecessary. Notice of withdrawal should also be given to the
applicant’s solicitor.
8.2 An application under section 10(2) or section 48(2) which has been withdrawn is not a bar to making in
matrimonial proceedings, the decree absolute and in civil partnership proceedings, the final order.
Maintenance Orders – registration in magistrates’ courts
9.1 Where periodical payments are required to be made to a child under an order registered in a magistrates’
court, section 62 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 permits the payments to be made instead to the person
with whom the child has his home. That person may proceed in his own name for variation, revival or revocation
of the order and may enforce payment either in his own name or by requesting the designated officer of the court
to do so.
9.2 The registration in a magistrates’ court of an order made direct to a child entails a considerable amount of
work. Accordingly, when the court is considering the form of an order where there are children, care should be
taken not to make orders for payment direct where such orders would be of no benefit to the parties.
Pensions
10.1 The phrase “party with pension rights” is used in FPR Part 9, Chapter 8. For matrimonial proceedings, this
phrase has the meaning given to it by section 25D(3) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and means “the party to
Jordan Publishing
www.familylaw.co.uk
4. the marriage who has or is likely to have benefits under a pension arrangement”. There is a definition of “civil
partner with pension rights” in paragraph 29 of Schedule 5 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 which mirrors the
definition of “party with pension rights” in section 25D(3) of the 1973 Act. The phrase “is likely to have benefits”
in these definitions refers to accrued rights to pension benefits which are not yet in payment.
PPF Compensation
11.1 The phrase “party with compensation rights” is used in FPR Part 9, Chapter 9. For matrimonial proceedings,
the phrase has the meaning given to it by section 25G(5) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and means the party
to the marriage who is or is likely to be entitled to PPF compensation. There is a definition of “civil partner with
compensation rights” in paragraph 37(1) of Schedule 5 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 which mirrors the
definition of “party with compensation rights” in section 25G(5). The phrase “is likely to be entitled to PPF
Compensation” in those definitions refers to statutory entitlement to PPF Compensation which is not yet in
payment.
Annex – Pre-application protocol
Notes of guidance
Scope of the Protocol
1 This protocol is intended to apply to all applications for a financial remedy as defined by rule 2.3. It is designed
to cover all classes of case, ranging from a simple application for periodical payments to an application for a
substantial lump sum and property adjustment order. The protocol is designed to facilitate the operation of the
procedure for financial remedy applications.
2 In considering the options of pre-application disclosure and negotiation, solicitors should bear in mind the
advantage of having a court timetable and court managed process. There is sometimes an advantage in preparing
disclosure before proceedings are commenced. However, solicitors should bear in mind the objective of
controlling costs and in particular the costs of discovery and that the option of pre-application disclosure and
negotiation has risks of excessive and uncontrolled expenditure and delay. This option should only be encouraged
where both parties agree to follow this route and disclosure is not likely to be an issue or has been adequately
dealt with in mediation or otherwise.
3 Solicitors should consider at an early stage and keep under review whether it would be appropriate to suggest
mediation and/or collaborative law to the clients as an alternative to solicitor negotiation or court based
litigation.
4 Making an application to the court should not be regarded as a hostile step or a last resort, rather as a way of
starting the court timetable, controlling disclosure and endeavouring to avoid the costly final hearing and the
preparation for it.
First letter
5 The circumstances of parties to an application for a financial remedy are so various that it would be difficult to
prepare a specimen first letter. The request for information will be different in every case. However, the tone of
the initial letter is important and the guidelines in paragraphs 14 and 15 should be followed. It should be
approved in advance by the client. Solicitors writing to an unrepresented party should always recommend that he
seeks independent legal advice and enclose a second copy of the letter to be passed to any solicitor instructed. A
reasonable time limit for an answer may be 14 days.
Negotiation and settlement
Jordan Publishing
www.familylaw.co.uk
5. 6 In the event of pre-application disclosure and negotiation, as envisaged in paragraph 12 an application should
not be issued when a settlement is a reasonable prospect.
Disclosure
7 The protocol underlines the obligation of parties to make full and frank disclosure of all material facts,
documents and other information relevant to the issues. Solicitors owe their clients a duty to tell them in clear
terms of this duty and of the possible consequences of breach of the duty, which may include criminal sanctions
under the Fraud Act 2006. This duty of disclosure is an ongoing obligation and includes the duty to disclose any
material changes after initial disclosure has been given. Solicitors are referred to the Good Practice Guides
available to Resolution members at www.resolution.org.uk and can also contact the Law Society’s Practice Advice
Service on 0870 606 2522.
The Protocol
General principles
8 All parties must always bear in mind the overriding objective set out at rules 1.1 to 1.4 and try to ensure that
applications should be resolved and a just outcome achieved as speedily as possible without costs being
unreasonably incurred. The needs of any children should be addressed and safeguarded. The procedures which it
is appropriate to follow should be conducted with minimum distress to the parties and in a manner designed to
promote as good a continuing relationship between the parties and any children affected as is possible in the
circumstances.
9 The principle of proportionality must be borne in mind at all times. It is unacceptable for the costs of any case
to be disproportionate to the financial value of the subject matter of the dispute.
10 Parties should be informed that where a court is considering whether to make an order requiring one party to
pay the costs of another party, it will take into account pre-application offers to settle and conduct of disclosure.
Identifying the issues
11 Parties must seek to clarify their claims and identify the issues between them as soon as possible. So that this
can be achieved, they must provide full, frank and clear disclosure of facts, information and documents, which are
material and sufficiently accurate to enable proper negotiations to take place to settle their differences.
Openness in all dealings is essential.
Disclosure
12 If parties carry out voluntary disclosure before the issue of proceedings the parties should exchange schedules
of assets, income, liabilities and other material facts, using the financial statement as a guide to the format of the
disclosure. Documents should only be disclosed to the extent that they are required by the financial statement.
Excessive or disproportionate costs should not be incurred.
Correspondence
13 Any first letter and subsequent correspondence must focus on the clarification of claims and identification of
issues and their resolution. Protracted and unnecessary correspondence and “trial by correspondence” must be
avoided.
14 The impact of any correspondence upon the reader and in particular the parties must always be considered.
Any correspondence which raises irrelevant issues or which might cause the other party to adopt an entrenched,
polarised or hostile position is to be discouraged.
Jordan Publishing
www.familylaw.co.uk
6. Summary
15 The aim of all pre-application proceedings steps must be to assist the parties to resolve their differences
speedily and fairly or at least narrow the issues and, should that not be possible, to assist the court to do so.
Jordan Publishing
www.familylaw.co.uk