In the Matter Of:
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
215-2023-CV-00241
BRIGITTE CODLING
May 20, 2024
· · · · · · · STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
GRAFTON, SS.· · · · · · · · · · ·SUPERIOR COURT
TOWN OF HAVERHILL· · · )
· · · · · · · · · · · ·)
· ·VS.· · · · · · · · ·)· · · · ·DOCKET NO.:
· · · · · · · · · · · ·)· · · · ·215-2023-CV-00241
DONAHUE, TUCKER &· · · )
CIANDELLA, PLLC· · · · )
· · · · · DEPOSITION OF BRIGITTE CODLING
· ·Deposition taken at the Robert E. Clifford
· ·Memorial Building, 65 South Court Street,
· ·Woodsville, New Hampshire, on Monday, May 20,
· ·2024, commencing at 9:10 a.m.
· ·Court Reporter:
· ·Dawn L. Griffin-Smith, LCR
· ·New Hampshire LCR #108 (RSA 310-A:161-181)
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
1
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
·1· · · · · · · · · · · · ·APPEARANCES
·2
·3· ·Representing the Plaintiff:
·4· · · · · · DEREK E. KLINE
· · · · · · · P.O. Box 1577
·5· · · · · · Center Harbor, NH· 03226
· · · · · · · By:· Derek E. Kline, Esq.
·6· · · · · · · · ·(603) 707-1721
· · · · · · · · · ·derekekline@gmail.com
·7
·8
·9· ·Representing the Defendants:
10· · · · · · GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI
· · · · · · · 66 Hanover Street
11· · · · · · Manchester, NH· 03101
· · · · · · · By:· James L. Soucy, Esq.
12· · · · · · · · ·(603) 782-0408
· · · · · · · · · ·jsoucy@grsm.com
13
14
15· ·Representing the Deponent:
16· · · · · · LEHMANN MAJOR LIST
· · · · · · · 6 Garvins Falls Road
17· · · · · · Concord, NH· 03301
· · · · · · · By:· Richard J. Lehmann, Esq.
18· · · · · · · · ·(603)731-5435
· · · · · · · · · ·rick@nhlawyer.com
19
20· ·Also Present: Roderick O'Shana
21
22
23
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
2
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
·1· · · · · · · · · · · · STIPULATIONS
·2
·3· · · · ·It is agreed that the deposition shall be taken
·4· ·in the first instance in stenotype and when transcribed
·5· ·may be used for all purposes for which depositions are
·6· ·competent under New Hampshire practice.
·7
·8· · · · ·Notice, filing, caption and all other formalities
·9· ·are waived.· All objections except as to form are
10· ·reserved and may be taken in court at time of trial.
11
12· · · · ·It is further agreed that if the deposition is
13· ·not signed within 30 days, the signature of the
14· ·deponent is waived.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
3
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
·1· · · · · · · · · · · · · I N D E X
·2
·3
·4· · · ·WITNESS:
·5· · · · ·BRIGITTE CODLING
·6
·7· · · ·EXAMINATION:· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Page
·8
·9· · · · ·By Mr. Soucy· ·. . . . . . . . . . .· · · 6
10
11
12· · · ·EXHIBITS FOR IDENTIFICATION:
13· · · · ·CODLING· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Page
14· ·Exhibit 1· · ·Town of Haverhill Nonpublic
· · · · · · · · · ·Meeting Minutes 3/6/20
15· · · · · · · · ·(Knapp Exhibit 6)· · · · · · · · ·60
16· ·Exhibit 2· · ·Town of Haverhill Meeting
· · · · · · · · · ·Minutes 1/9/22· · · · · · · · · · 68
17
· · ·Exhibit 3· · ·5/15/24 Email
18· · · · · · · · ·(Knapp Exhibit 21)· · · · · · · · 75
19· ·Exhibit 4· · ·1/13/23 Email· · · · · · · · · · 122
20· ·Exhibit 5· · ·7/12/23 Email· · · · · · · · · · 130
21· ·Exhibit 6· · ·1/27/22 Email· · · · · · · · · · 146
22· ·Exhibit 7· · ·1/31/22 Email· · · · · · · · · · 153
23· ·Exhibit 8· · ·2/2/22 Email· · · · · · · · · · ·155
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
4
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
·1· · · ·EXHIBITS FOR IDENTIFICATION CONT.:
·2· · · · ·CODLING· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Page
·3· ·Exhibit 9· · ·1/6/23 Email
· · · · · · · · · ·(Knapp Exhibit 2)· · · · · · · · 165
·4
· · ·Exhibit 10· · Text Messages· · · · · · · · · · 172
·5
· · ·Exhibit 11· · Text Messages cont.· · · · · · · 174
·6
·7
·8
· · · ·(Original exhibits retained by court reporter and
·9· · ·returned to Attorney Soucy.· Scanned copies provided
· · · ·to all counsel.)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
5
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · · · P R O C E E D I N G S
·2· · · · · · · · · · · BRIGITTE CODLING,
·3· · · · having been duly sworn by the Court Reporter,
·4· · · · · · was deposed and testified as follows:
·5· · · · · · · · · · · · *************
·6· · · · · · · · · · · · ·EXAMINATION
·7· ·BY MR. SOUCY:
·8· ·Q.· Okay.· So now that we are on the record, everything
·9· · · ·that we are, each of us are saying is being typed
10· · · ·out in shorthand verbatim, so I will have you state
11· · · ·for the record and spell your last name, your full
12· · · ·name, please.
13· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Jim?
14· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Yeah?
15· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Stipulations?
16· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· We can have the usual stips.
17· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· All objections are preserved.
18· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Yup.
19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Except as to form?
20· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Form.· Yup.· All set?
21· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Yes.
22· ·BY MR. SOUCY:
23· ·Q.· Yes, so could you please state your full name,
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
6
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·spell your last name?
·2· ·A.· Brigitte Codling.· Last name, C-O-D-L-I-N-G.
·3· ·Q.· Ms. Codling, have you ever had your deposition
·4· · · ·taken before?
·5· ·A.· No.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.· So given the fact this is a first-time event
·7· · · ·for you, I'll just go over sort of the ground
·8· · · ·rules.· I'm going to presume that your attorney has
·9· · · ·gone over some or all of them, but just so that we
10· · · ·cover them here in the moment.
11· · · · · · · · ·As I stated, everything that all of us
12· · · ·say is going to be recorded in shorthand initially
13· · · ·by the stenographer here.· And I'm going to be
14· · · ·asking you questions.· You can give your full
15· · · ·answer to them.
16· · · · · · · · ·While I'm asking the question, so that we
17· · · ·don't get the stenographer's fingers all tied in
18· · · ·knots, we'll try not to talk over each other.· Even
19· · · ·though you may be able to anticipate or expect
20· · · ·where the question is going like we do in normal
21· · · ·conversations, because this is being transcribed I
22· · · ·will ask you to try to keep that in mind.
23· · · · · · · · ·And, again, even though you may
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
7
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·anticipate where the question is going and what I'm
·2· · · ·getting at, please try to wait for the question in
·3· · · ·consideration for the stenographer.· And then once
·4· · · ·I'm done, you can give your full answer, okay?
·5· ·A.· Yup.· Yes.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.· The second thing is because this is not
·7· · · ·being video-recorded but only verbatim transcribed,
·8· · · ·I'll ask you that when you're giving your answers,
·9· · · ·first and foremost you provide a verbal response to
10· · · ·your question, and it's in conversation
11· · · ·affirmation, shaking your head, nodding your head,
12· · · ·those sorts of things we tend to do out of habit,
13· · · ·and so with respect to your responses please give
14· · · ·them in an audible manner.
15· · · · · · · · ·And then in addition, I don't see that
16· · · ·there will be, but in the event that there is a
17· · · ·question, for instance, where I ask you, Where did
18· · · ·you walk?· And you say, Well, over there.· Well,
19· · · ·everybody in the room can see you point to the
20· · · ·right or to the left.· In the printed format that
21· · · ·doesn't come out so well.· So when you do give an
22· · · ·answer that provides some sort of direction, I will
23· · · ·ask you to try to remember -- we'll probably remind
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
8
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·you -- but try to remember to say to the right or
·2· · · ·to the left or something that when you're reading
·3· · · ·the transcript of what you've stated, it'll be
·4· · · ·clear to anybody who reads it; is that clear?
·5· ·A.· Yes.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.· Probably most important is when I ask you a
·7· · · ·question, if there is a question or something that
·8· · · ·I have said or stated is not clear to you, please
·9· · · ·don't presume that you're the only one in the room
10· · · ·who doesn't understand what the heck the attorney
11· · · ·is saying -- attorneys ask poor questions -- I
12· · · ·won't say all the time, but it's not uncommon for
13· · · ·an attorney to ask a poorly worded question
14· · · ·thinking that we asked it superbly.
15· · · · · · · · ·So if you don't understand a question,
16· · · ·please let me know.· I will either restate it or
17· · · ·phrase it in a different way so that you do
18· · · ·understand, okay?
19· ·A.· Yes.
20· ·Q.· Okay.· In connection with that, after I ask you a
21· · · ·question and you begin to and fully give your
22· · · ·answer, we're going to be allowed to presume that
23· · · ·you're giving your answer to the question that's
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
9
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·asked because you've understood it, okay?
·2· ·A.· Uh-huh.· Yes.
·3· ·Q.· If at any point in time, not knowing how long we
·4· · · ·are going to be, but if at any point in time you
·5· · · ·need to take a break, just the only thing that I'm
·6· · · ·going to ask is that when there's a question that's
·7· · · ·been posed, that you provide your answer to it so
·8· · · ·we have a clean end point or stopping point on the
·9· · · ·record, okay?
10· ·A.· Yes.
11· ·Q.· Okay.· Currently what is your employment?· What do
12· · · ·you do?
13· ·A.· I work for the Town of Haverhill, New Hampshire, as
14· · · ·the town administrator.
15· ·Q.· And how long have you been in that particular
16· · · ·position?
17· ·A.· Since April 8th of this year.
18· ·Q.· 2014; correct?· Sorry, '24.
19· ·A.· '24.· With change of government my title changed on
20· · · ·that date.
21· ·Q.· And prior to April, sorry April 8th of 2024, how
22· · · ·were you employed?
23· ·A.· I was the town manager for the Town of Haverhill,
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
10
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·New Hampshire, since April 23rd of 2019.
·2· ·Q.· And prior to April 3rd of 2019, what did you do for
·3· · · ·work?
·4· ·A.· I worked for the Vermont Agency of Transportation
·5· · · ·for nearly 20 years.
·6· ·Q.· What was your most recent position or job title
·7· · · ·with them?
·8· ·A.· Contract manager for the CMS software replacement
·9· · · ·project.
10· ·Q.· About how long were you in that role or position?
11· ·A.· About a year.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· Total about 20 years you said?
13· ·A.· 20 years with the Vermont Agency of Transportation.
14· ·Q.· Right.· And could you please provide us with a
15· · · ·summary of what you have for formal education going
16· · · ·back in time or reverse chronology?
17· ·A.· I have a bachelor's degree from the Vermont College
18· · · ·of Norwich University in architectural studies; and
19· · · ·I have a master's degree from the Western Governors
20· · · ·University in management and leadership.
21· ·Q.· When did you receive or obtain that master's
22· · · ·degree?
23· ·A.· January of 2020, around there.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
11
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Are you certain of the year?
·2· ·A.· It might have been December of the previous year.
·3· · · ·It was in the, over the winter, around Christmas,
·4· · · ·that I finally finished that degree.
·5· ·Q.· So you finished the coursework, then, in, towards
·6· · · ·the end of 2019?
·7· ·A.· I believe so.
·8· ·Q.· And then were awarded or conferred a degree
·9· · · ·sometime in the summer of 2020?
10· ·A.· I think it was in January, but I could be
11· · · ·misremembering that.· It was around that time
12· · · ·frame.· They mailed our diploma.
13· ·Q.· Okay.· And since completing that formal education
14· · · ·and course, have you taken any additional or any
15· · · ·other courses of any kind?
16· ·A.· I have a number of courses I have taken throughout
17· · · ·my career.
18· ·Q.· But since January of 2020?
19· ·A.· I am, I just received my certification as a
20· · · ·government finance officer.
21· ·Q.· And where did you take those courses through?
22· ·A.· Through the governors, sorry, the Government
23· · · ·Finance Officer's Association in the State of New
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
12
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·Hampshire.
·2· ·Q.· Again, anything since January of 2020 as far as
·3· · · ·formal courses or education?
·4· ·A.· None that I can think of right now.· We take
·5· · · ·courses all of time, but nothing, it's just
·6· · · ·continuing education-type training.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.· What was the last continuing education
·8· · · ·training that you recall taking?
·9· ·A.· It would have been that government finance.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· And how regular, and so, so do you have any
11· · · ·licensing or certifications, outside of this
12· · · ·certified government finance officer do you have
13· · · ·any other licenses or certifications that you do
14· · · ·any kind of continuing education courses or take
15· · · ·credits for?
16· ·A.· None that I take continuing education credits for.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· You are not an attorney licensed to practice
18· · · ·in any state; correct?
19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
20· ·Q.· You can answer.
21· ·A.· No, I'm not an attorney.
22· ·Q.· Okay.· And you don't consider yourself an expert in
23· · · ·the analysis of legal conflicts or those sorts of
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
13
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·things, do you?
·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·3· ·Q.· You can answer.
·4· ·A.· I don't think I'm an expert in legal, no.
·5· ·Q.· And you don't consider yourself an expert in
·6· · · ·connection with retention of attorneys or law firms
·7· · · ·in New Hampshire; correct?
·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·9· ·Q.· You can answer.
10· ·A.· I wouldn't consider myself an expert.
11· ·Q.· Okay.· Now, in the testimony that you're giving
12· · · ·here today, in what capacity are you providing
13· · · ·answers to these questions?
14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
15· ·Q.· You can answer.
16· ·A.· Can you rephrase what you ...
17· ·Q.· Yes.· I tried to ask the question sort of as a
18· · · ·reporter at, you know, an investigation or scene,
19· · · ·sort of who, what, when, where, how.· Are you
20· · · ·giving testimony based upon you as an individual
21· · · ·person being a resident of wherever it is that you
22· · · ·live; or are you giving testimony in your capacity
23· · · ·within the government or administration of the Town
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
14
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·of Haverhill, New Hampshire?
·2· ·A.· I believe I'm here giving testimony related to my
·3· · · ·position.
·4· ·Q.· Okay.· And as a fact witness, meaning about events
·5· · · ·that you have direct experience from or of;
·6· · · ·correct?
·7· ·A.· Exactly, yes.
·8· ·Q.· Okay.· How many districts are there in the Town of
·9· · · ·Haverhill?
10· ·A.· There are four formal special-purpose districts.
11· ·Q.· And what are their names?
12· ·A.· There's Haverhill Corner, North Haverhill, Mountain
13· · · ·Lake, and the Village of Woodsville.
14· ·Q.· In addition to the special districts are there any
15· · · ·other distinctions or layers within the government
16· · · ·and the administration of the Town of Haverhill,
17· · · ·New Hampshire?
18· ·A.· Not layers of government, no.
19· ·Q.· Okay.· Are there anything that is distinct in
20· · · ·addition to these special districts,
21· · · ·special-purpose districts that is within the Town
22· · · ·of or about the Town of Haverhill?
23· ·A.· We have some common-name areas of town, such as
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
15
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·Central Haverhill, Pike, and East Haverhill.· Those
·2· · · ·are not formal districts, but they are areas of
·3· · · ·town with common names.
·4· ·Q.· How many police departments are there within the
·5· · · ·Town of Haverhill?
·6· ·A.· One.
·7· ·Q.· Fire departments?
·8· ·A.· Two.
·9· ·Q.· Water and/or sewer departments?
10· ·A.· The four special-purpose districts offer water.· So
11· · · ·each of those special-purpose districts, one of
12· · · ·their special purposes is to provide water service
13· · · ·to their residents.
14· ·Q.· Self-contained unto themselves?
15· ·A.· Some of them are.· Some of them transcend over
16· · · ·their district boundaries with their service.
17· ·Q.· And what about any municipal services or service
18· · · ·areas with respect to sewer?
19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
20· ·Q.· You can answer.
21· ·A.· The Village of Woodsville offers sewer service as
22· · · ·well as sewer treatment; and the Town of Haverhill
23· · · ·has an out-of-district sewer system in North that
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
16
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·services North Haverhill and areas of North
·2· · · ·Haverhill.
·3· ·Q.· And when there was a town manager form of
·4· · · ·government for the Town of Haverhill, can you
·5· · · ·explain who the town manager worked for?
·6· ·A.· Town manager works for the select board.
·7· ·Q.· And the select board works for and/or oversees the
·8· · · ·governance of the entire town of Haverhill?
·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
10· ·Q.· You can answer.
11· ·A.· The select board is a governing body.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· For the entire town?
13· ·A.· For the entire town.
14· ·Q.· And that includes the four special-purpose
15· · · ·districts?
16· ·A.· Yes.
17· ·Q.· While you were town manager what familiarity did
18· · · ·you have with your roles and your responsibilities
19· · · ·in that position?
20· ·A.· I think I had a very good understanding of my roles
21· · · ·and responsibilities as town manager.
22· ·Q.· Okay.· And what is there, going back now because
23· · · ·it's a prior form of governance, but what was there
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
17
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·with respect to statutes that you were familiar
·2· · · ·with that provided guidance and authority with
·3· · · ·respect to the role of town manager in Haverhill,
·4· · · ·New Hampshire?
·5· ·A.· RSA 37 specifically.
·6· ·Q.· And RSA Chapter 37 prescribes in a general manner
·7· · · ·that the town manager is responsible to or
·8· · · ·answerable to which part of the government in the
·9· · · ·Town of Haverhill?
10· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
11· ·Q.· You can answer.
12· ·A.· The town manager is under the general supervision
13· · · ·of the select board.
14· ·Q.· Okay.· Generally what activities were you able to
15· · · ·do in your role while you served as town manager
16· · · ·for the Town of Haverhill?
17· ·A.· With, under a town manager form of government most
18· · · ·of the responsibilities of the day-to-day
19· · · ·operations:· Hiring, firing, setting wages, signing
20· · · ·contracts, executing contracts, was under the
21· · · ·purview of the town manager, among other things.
22· ·Q.· Fair to say generally employment and human resource
23· · · ·activities?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
18
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·2· ·Q.· You can answer.
·3· ·A.· Those were included, yes.
·4· ·Q.· Okay.· The hiring, the firing and setting, I don't
·5· · · ·want to say pay scales, but maybe hourly rates and
·6· · · ·those sort of things, those are something that are
·7· · · ·typically referred to as HR or employment-related
·8· · · ·kind of things; correct?
·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
10· ·Q.· You can answer.
11· ·A.· Yeah, HR and the management of people for the Town
12· · · ·of Haverhill was one of my responsibilities.
13· ·Q.· Okay.· Is it fair to say that you were, carried out
14· · · ·day-to-day activities, but the board of selectmen
15· · · ·reviewed what the town manager had done as far as
16· · · ·actions and decisions?
17· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
18· ·Q.· You can answer.
19· ·A.· The board would not review --
20· ·Q.· Okay.
21· ·A.· -- my work.· I would report to them activities
22· · · ·within the town, the town, within my role as town
23· · · ·manager.· So every other week I would report to
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
19
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·them things that had happened.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.· So that was on a periodic or regular basis
·3· · · ·as far as updates that you'd give the board of
·4· · · ·selectmen?
·5· ·A.· Yes.
·6· ·Q.· When and where would those updates occur that you
·7· · · ·would provide to the board of selectmen as town
·8· · · ·manager?
·9· ·A.· For most of my tenure as town manager I would offer
10· · · ·a biweekly town manager report, which I would give
11· · · ·at select board meetings.
12· ·Q.· At public meetings?
13· ·A.· Public meetings.
14· ·Q.· Generally what involvement as town manager did you
15· · · ·have in connection with contracts in which Town of
16· · · ·Haverhill would engage in for supplies for vendors,
17· · · ·for contractors, to do work, you know, on town
18· · · ·property, on town buildings, that sort of thing.
19· · · ·Very general question but can you give us a summary
20· · · ·to start?
21· ·A.· So it was my responsibility to determine when it
22· · · ·was needed for us to go out to bid RFPR 2 or seek a
23· · · ·new vendor or something along those lines.· So it
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
20
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·was my responsibility to go out and do that kind of
·2· · · ·recruitment, do the bidding process, go through the
·3· · · ·bidding process, selection process, the contracting
·4· · · ·association and the execution of the contract.
·5· ·Q.· Who else or what other departments or roles would
·6· · · ·you typically engage or, sort of, bring into the
·7· · · ·process as far as your role as town manager and
·8· · · ·taking care of whatever buildings or vendors or
·9· · · ·materials needed to be supplied to the town?
10· ·A.· I worked directly with my department head.
11· ·Q.· Okay.· So the Town didn't expect you to be, I don't
12· · · ·want to say an expert, but knowledgeable in every
13· · · ·single thing that you did; correct?
14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
15· ·Q.· You can answer.
16· ·A.· So I don't think I was expected to be an expert in
17· · · ·every little thing that the Town did, but it was, I
18· · · ·believe, expected that I would hire individuals who
19· · · ·had expertise in various areas like maintenance,
20· · · ·highways and human resources, those sorts of
21· · · ·things.· So if I didn't know it, I was seeking
22· · · ·people who could assist in that role.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· And but -- thank you.· But in my, I think I
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
21
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·was looking for and asking, the question was who
·2· · · ·else within either the governance of the town or
·3· · · ·the administration of the town would you reach out
·4· · · ·to, slang way of saying it, but also use as a
·5· · · ·resource if a roof needed to be put on, a furnace
·6· · · ·needed to be replaced.· Would those things, types
·7· · · ·of things, be what you would also be involved in as
·8· · · ·the town manager?
·9· ·A.· Those are thing I would definitely be involved in.
10· ·Q.· Okay.
11· ·A.· So, like I said, I would work with my department
12· · · ·heads.· For example, we have a head of maintenance,
13· · · ·so if there was a roof that needed to be replaced,
14· · · ·then I would be working with him, and together we
15· · · ·would be working towards building that project and
16· · · ·getting it out to bid and going through the
17· · · ·selection process and the contracting process
18· · · ·through execution of getting a new roof put on.
19· · · · · · · · ·I would also coordinate with the select
20· · · ·board with regards to funding on an annual basis of
21· · · ·projects coming, because it's the board that
22· · · ·approves the final budget that goes to town
23· · · ·meeting.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
22
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Okay.
·2· ·A.· And so we would present our projects to the select
·3· · · ·board during budget workshop, and whatever made it
·4· · · ·into the budget got, and through the budget process
·5· · · ·of town meetings were projects we were able to
·6· · · ·execute the next year.
·7· ·Q.· And then on the, or during work being done by any
·8· · · ·company or contractor outside of the administration
·9· · · ·or governance of Haverhill, who would that, who
10· · · ·would be involved in seeing that work was actually
11· · · ·carried out and the products were actually provided
12· · · ·and delivered to the town, who was responsible for
13· · · ·that?· Was that the town manager's role as well?
14· ·A.· It was the town manager through the department
15· · · ·heads.
16· ·Q.· Generally would you be directly involved in that or
17· · · ·was that something that as town manager you were
18· · · ·able to rely on the department heads for the most
19· · · ·part?
20· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
21· ·Q.· You can answer.
22· ·A.· Can you rephrase what ...
23· ·Q.· Yeah, so I'm thinking of a vendor supplying
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
23
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·products or materials or supplies over the course
·2· · · ·of the year and deliveries, picking them three or
·3· · · ·four times a year, or work being performed, you
·4· · · ·know, on a municipal building or something like
·5· · · ·that.· In a general sense those types of
·6· · · ·activities, did the Town expect or anticipate that
·7· · · ·the town manager would be, to use the phrase,
·8· · · ·"hands on" directly reviewing the work and the
·9· · · ·materials being delivered?· Or in general would you
10· · · ·be able to rely on the department heads for that?
11· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
12· ·Q.· You can answer.
13· ·A.· In a lot of cases I would rely on my department
14· · · ·heads to make sure that what was ordered was
15· · · ·delivered.· However, through the checks and
16· · · ·balances of financing something like that or paying
17· · · ·for something like that, then I would become aware
18· · · ·if the department heads didn't make me acutely
19· · · ·aware.· I was one of the layers of checking for
20· · · ·payments.
21· ·Q.· And as far as once those materials or that work was
22· · · ·completed or was in process, if it was a larger
23· · · ·kind of situation, what about as invoices were
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
24
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·received by the Town, what was the town manager's
·2· · · ·role with respect to invoices coming in, again for
·3· · · ·either work performed, services provided,
·4· · · ·materials, what was the town manager's role on that
·5· · · ·phase of something?
·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·7· ·Q.· You can answer.
·8· ·A.· I'm, the town manager is one of the layers of
·9· · · ·checks and balances with regard to paying invoices.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· What are the other, quote/unquote, layers?
11· ·A.· So the invoices are coded by the department head.
12· · · ·It's reviewed and verified what's being paid for
13· · · ·was delivered, whether that's a service or a good.
14· · · · · · · · ·They are supposed to, what they do is
15· · · ·code those invoices against their budget lines,
16· · · ·because they are responsible for their budget.
17· · · ·That would then come into the bookkeeper, get
18· · · ·entered into the system.
19· · · · · · · · ·The bookkeeper then provides that to the
20· · · ·financial administrator for review.· Goes back to
21· · · ·the bookkeeper for any corrections.· Comes back to
22· · · ·the financial administrator for a check, and then
23· · · ·it comes to the town manager for a check and then
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
25
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·it goes to the select board for a check and final
·2· · · ·approval.
·3· ·Q.· By the word, you used "check" a lot of times in
·4· · · ·that description.· You mean verification when --
·5· ·A.· You're verifying, yes.· You're verifying that the
·6· · · ·proper codes were used; verifying that, you know,
·7· · · ·everything looks kosher.· Verifying, you know, if I
·8· · · ·had to go back to a department head and ask a
·9· · · ·question, that would be my opportunity to ask
10· · · ·something about the billing before it got finally
11· · · ·presented to the board for final approval.
12· ·Q.· And then who would authorize payment from the Town
13· · · ·funds to the vendor or the supplier, and by that I
14· · · ·mean was that, back when there was a town manager
15· · · ·form of government, the board of selectmen or the
16· · · ·town manager that checked that box, so to speak, so
17· · · ·funds would actually go out from the Town?
18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
19· ·Q.· You can answer.
20· ·A.· So originally it would be the department head
21· · · ·verifying and making payments.
22· ·Q.· Right.
23· ·A.· It would be my responsibility to make sure that
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
26
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·that was all done according to our policies and
·2· · · ·procedures.
·3· ·Q.· Uh-huh.
·4· ·A.· But the board of selectmen is the final authority
·5· · · ·on the ability for us cutting checks.
·6· ·Q.· So then that isn't something, cutting checks, then,
·7· · · ·wasn't something that was within your activities or
·8· · · ·responsibilities as town manager then?
·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
10· ·Q.· You can answer.
11· ·A.· No.· As the town manager I can't cut checks.
12· ·Q.· And what about engaging either vendors, suppliers
13· · · ·or contractors, was that a decision that the town
14· · · ·manager made or was it the board of selectmen?
15· ·A.· The town manager.
16· ·Q.· What was there for process established for review
17· · · ·of any contract that the town manager was going to
18· · · ·sign or engage in on behalf of the Town, was there
19· · · ·any review set up or pre-approval by the board of
20· · · ·selectmen generally?
21· ·A.· No.
22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
23· ·Q.· You can answer.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
27
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· No.· There were times where I would bring things to
·2· · · ·the select board that I felt needed their attention
·3· · · ·or I wanted their input in or I felt I needed it
·4· · · ·for some reason, specifically very political things
·5· · · ·I would bring to the select board.
·6· ·Q.· To run it past them, is the phrase, usually?
·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·8· ·Q.· You can answer.
·9· ·A.· Yeah.
10· ·Q.· Okay.
11· ·A.· Yeah.
12· ·Q.· Primarily we are here today, I'm here today to ask
13· · · ·you questions regarding the Town of Haverhill's
14· · · ·petition or complaint for declaratory judgment in
15· · · ·connection with the services that have been
16· · · ·allegedly provided by Donahue, Tucker and
17· · · ·Ciandella, you understand that; correct?
18· ·A.· Yes.
19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
20· ·A.· Yes.
21· ·Q.· With respect to the services that Donahue, Tucker
22· · · ·and Ciandella, and I will refer to them as DTC, the
23· · · ·three letters, D and T and C throughout.· If
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
28
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·there's any confusion, you can just ask me, but is
·2· · · ·it okay just to say DTC for the law firm?
·3· ·A.· Yeah, that's fine with me.
·4· ·Q.· Okay.· So with respect to the lawsuit, have you or
·5· · · ·what have you read and reviewed with respect to the
·6· · · ·documents that have been filed in the court or with
·7· · · ·the court in connection with that lawsuit?· Have
·8· · · ·you reviewed any of those documents?
·9· ·A.· Most of them.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· So you're generally aware that DTC is
11· · · ·alleging that they provided legal services or legal
12· · · ·work to the Town at the request of the board of
13· · · ·selectmen; correct?
14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
15· ·Q.· You can answer.
16· ·A.· Can you say that again?· I'm sorry.
17· ·Q.· Yes.· You're aware that DTC is alleging that they
18· · · ·provided legal services or did legal work, you
19· · · ·know, for or on behalf of the Town at the request
20· · · ·of the board of selectmen, and they are seeking to
21· · · ·get paid for that.· That's generally what they are
22· · · ·alleging.· You're aware of that; correct?
23· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
29
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· I understand that's what they're alleging.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.· Can you please provide a summary of what
·3· · · ·your understanding is as to how DTC became involved
·4· · · ·in connection what in the documents filed with the
·5· · · ·court referred to as the DRA tax setting matter.
·6· · · ·What's your understanding as to how DTC got
·7· · · ·involved in that matter?
·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·9· ·Q.· You can answer.
10· ·A.· My understanding is that specifically Chris Hawkins
11· · · ·got involved because he had represented the
12· · · ·Woodsville Fire District, and some of the Haverhill
13· · · ·select board members knew him from that capacity.
14· ·Q.· Okay.· And what's your understanding of the, what
15· · · ·DTC did, what work they did?· What's your
16· · · ·understanding of what they are saying they did?
17· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
18· ·Q.· You can answer.
19· ·A.· What they are saying they did or what ...
20· ·Q.· Correct.· But what's your, I want to state it in
21· · · ·the form of not expecting or anticipating that you
22· · · ·know everything, right, so what's your
23· · · ·understanding of what they said they did for or on
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
30
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·behalf of the Town in connection with that DRA rate
·2· · · ·setting issue?
·3· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·4· ·A.· Well, they say they worked with the board of
·5· · · ·selectmen to assist the Town in getting the tax
·6· · · ·rate set.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.· And what's your assessment with respect to
·8· · · ·their position or their allegations on what they
·9· · · ·did?
10· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
11· ·A.· My assessment?
12· ·Q.· Yes.
13· ·A.· That's what you're asking?
14· ·Q.· Yes.
15· ·A.· My assessment is that they were not, in fact,
16· · · ·working on behalf of the Town to do what they say
17· · · ·they were trying to do.
18· ·Q.· Okay.· And why do you think or believe that?
19· ·A.· That they were not working on behalf of the Town?
20· ·Q.· Correct.
21· ·A.· Well, one, we had, we had not gone through a
22· · · ·conflict waiver check to, throughout the entire tax
23· · · ·rate setting process there was no engagement
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
31
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·letter, and they were not engaging with town
·2· · · ·administration at all; and we were already working
·3· · · ·with Drummond Woodsum Law Firm to get the tax rate
·4· · · ·set.
·5· ·Q.· Okay.· So with respect to the conflict waiver
·6· · · ·process, what would that have looked like back when
·7· · · ·DTC said that it started doing work for or on
·8· · · ·behalf of the Town?
·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
10· ·A.· Normally when we engage with attorneys, the first
11· · · ·thing we ask for is to do conflict checks.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· And who was "we"?
13· ·A.· Town administration.
14· ·Q.· Okay.· And who specifically back in, let's say
15· · · ·2022, who would that have been, meaning the,
16· · · ·quote/unquote, town administration?
17· ·A.· Myself or the assistant town manager.
18· ·Q.· Okay.· And does, based upon your knowledge and
19· · · ·information does the Town or would back in 2022,
20· · · ·did the board of selectmen have that power and
21· · · ·authority to engage in that process on its own?
22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
23· ·Q.· You can answer.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
32
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· The board of select -- in a hypothetical situation?
·2· · · ·Are we talking hypothetical or in that particular
·3· · · ·situation?
·4· ·Q.· In the same set of facts that have played out as
·5· · · ·you understand them.
·6· ·A.· As far as I understand with regards to that
·7· · · ·situation they would not have.
·8· ·Q.· Okay.· What prohibited them from or would have
·9· · · ·prohibited them from engaging in that conflict
10· · · ·review process, as you put it?
11· ·A.· They could have engaged with me in that conflict
12· · · ·review process.
13· ·Q.· Okay.
14· ·A.· But what prohibited them from doing it on their own
15· · · ·was that the Board of Selectmen of the Town of
16· · · ·Haverhill had issued me full authority over all
17· · · ·matters related to the Woodsville Fire District.
18· ·Q.· Is it your understanding that when the Board of
19· · · ·Selectmen for the Town of Haverhill delegated that
20· · · ·activity or that role to you, that the board of
21· · · ·selectmen no longer had any power to do that
22· · · ·activity or engage in that activity any longer?
23· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
33
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· You can answer.
·2· ·A.· It was my understanding that it was my
·3· · · ·responsibility because they had given me that.
·4· · · ·They had officially and in an official capacity at
·5· · · ·a warned meeting issued me that authority solely.
·6· ·Q.· So in giving you or conveying that authority to
·7· · · ·you, the board of selectmen must have had that
·8· · · ·power or that role to give over to you; correct?
·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
10· ·Q.· You can answer.
11· ·A.· I think in general we shared, normally would have
12· · · ·shared the responsibility, though I was
13· · · ·historically the only one performing that function.
14· · · · · · · · ·And then they specifically handed over
15· · · ·all authority with related, with any legal matters
16· · · ·related to Woodsville Fire District to me.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· Is the Woodsville Fire District the same as
18· · · ·or interchangeable with the Woodsville Village
19· · · ·District?
20· ·A.· Yes.
21· ·Q.· Are the two of the same?
22· ·A.· Yup.
23· ·Q.· I have been wondering that for a heck of a long
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
34
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·time, so I had to ask that.
·2· ·A.· Yes.
·3· ·Q.· Okay.
·4· ·A.· Woodsville Fire District, Woodsville Village
·5· · · ·District, Woodsville Special Purpose District, yes.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.· Same horse by a different name?
·7· ·A.· Yes.
·8· ·Q.· Okay.· So, again, we will try to keep our minds
·9· · · ·back in, say 2020 to 2022, some sort of narrow time
10· · · ·frame, not going back to the 1800s or something
11· · · ·like that.
12· ·A.· That's good.
13· ·Q.· So let's say 2022 or 2020, typically what occurred
14· · · ·in Town of Haverhill was that the town manager,
15· · · ·whoever was in that role, would typically or
16· · · ·generally review contracts and those sorts of
17· · · ·things for the Town, whatever the Town needed; is
18· · · ·that a fair summary?
19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
20· ·Q.· You can answer.
21· ·A.· Yes.· As town manager I had been responsible for
22· · · ·all contracts.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· With respect to this DRA tax setting issue,
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
35
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·it's established in documents filed with the court
·2· · · ·that, I don't want to say you personally, but the
·3· · · ·town manager's position that board of selectmen had
·4· · · ·delegated the activity of handling the day-to-day
·5· · · ·administration of legal matters relating to
·6· · · ·Woodsville, but it's the Woodsville Village
·7· · · ·District; is that accurate?
·8· ·A.· Yes.
·9· ·Q.· Okay.· As, I'm trying to understand what you're
10· · · ·saying, what I think you're saying is when that
11· · · ·formal act occurred at a public meeting, what is
12· · · ·your understanding as to whether or not the board
13· · · ·of selectmen still had any power or authority to
14· · · ·still do those activities, again in connection with
15· · · ·the DRA rate setting issue?
16· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
17· ·Q.· You can answer.
18· ·A.· So it was my understanding that they no longer had
19· · · ·that authority.
20· ·Q.· Okay.
21· ·A.· They could have changed that at any time; they had
22· · · ·the power.
23· ·Q.· Right.· So when, do you recall what the date was
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
36
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·when the board of selectmen assigned or gave that
·2· · · ·power to you, delegated that matter to you, as far
·3· · · ·as legal matters relating Woodsville; do you recall
·4· · · ·when that occurred?
·5· ·A.· I don't remember the exact date, but it's in the
·6· · · ·records.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.· Your understanding as town manager was that
·8· · · ·when that event occurred, that the board of
·9· · · ·selectmen no longer had any power to review
10· · · ·contracts, waive conflicts of interest or anything
11· · · ·like that, again, with respect to legal matters
12· · · ·relating to Woodsville; is that correct?
13· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
14· ·Q.· You can answer.
15· ·A.· It was my understanding that was the case and that
16· · · ·was also their intent.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· As far as your understanding that when they
18· · · ·delegated that activity or that role to you, that
19· · · ·the board of selectmen was left with no power to
20· · · ·continue doing those matters, contract review or
21· · · ·attorney retention review or conflict of interest
22· · · ·reviews and waivers, what is your understanding, as
23· · · ·town manager what's your understanding based upon?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
37
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·Where did that come from?
·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·3· ·Q.· You can answer.
·4· ·A.· It comes from RSA 37.· It comes from speaking with
·5· · · ·other attorneys and speaking with my board of
·6· · · ·selectmen at the time that that was their intent.
·7· ·Q.· Do you know if the, their intent, meaning the board
·8· · · ·of selectmen's intent, is reflected in any minutes
·9· · · ·of the meetings from back then?
10· ·A.· Only in the motion that they made.· That motion is
11· · · ·documented.· The discussion took place in a
12· · · ·nonpublic session.
13· ·Q.· So what is there for statements or summary of the
14· · · ·board members' explanation of their intent to
15· · · ·convey all of their power and be left with nothing
16· · · ·with respect to the, you know, all matters, legal
17· · · ·matters relating to Woodsville?
18· ·A.· It would be --
19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
20· ·Q.· You can answer.
21· ·A.· It would be in those nonpublic minutes, which I
22· · · ·don't believe have been unsealed yet or at all.
23· ·Q.· And then if it's not recorded in the minutes from
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
38
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·those, that nonpublic session, then is it fair to
·2· · · ·say that it wasn't stated and not understood by the
·3· · · ·board members that that was the arrangement?
·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·5· ·Q.· You can answer.
·6· ·A.· I'm not sure what you're asking.
·7· ·Q.· If I understand what you're saying, your
·8· · · ·understanding is, is that when the board of
·9· · · ·selectmen assigned or delegated the role to you of
10· · · ·all matters, all legal matters relating to
11· · · ·Woodsville, when they conferred that responsibility
12· · · ·on to you, the board of selectmen was left with no
13· · · ·power or authority to do anything; is that correct?
14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
15· ·Q.· You can answer.
16· ·A.· Related to the legal matters related to the
17· · · ·Woodsville Fire District only.
18· ·Q.· Correct.· But that's, that's your understanding,
19· · · ·that once they assigned that or delegated that
20· · · ·responsibility and role to you, the board of
21· · · ·selectmen was left with no power or authority in
22· · · ·connection with that matter; correct?
23· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
39
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· Specifically they didn't want to be.· They wanted
·2· · · ·it to be me that took that role.
·3· ·Q.· Okay.· And then if I understand what you stated
·4· · · ·here today is that when the board of selectmen
·5· · · ·voted and made the motion and voted to give you or
·6· · · ·delegate to you that responsibility of that role,
·7· · · ·that their intent to transfer any and all power and
·8· · · ·authority that they had over to you is reflected in
·9· · · ·the minutes; is that correct?
10· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
11· ·Q.· You can answer.
12· ·A.· I would have to go back and look at the minutes. I
13· · · ·haven't looked at any of that in a couple of years.
14· ·Q.· Okay.
15· ·A.· So I can't say if it's reflected explicitly in the
16· · · ·minutes.
17· ·Q.· If it's not reflected in the minutes of that
18· · · ·nonpublic session that the board of selectmen
19· · · ·intended to delegate all of its power, all of its
20· · · ·authority to review contracts and sign waivers of
21· · · ·conflict of interest and all those sort of things
22· · · ·with respect to legal matters relating to
23· · · ·Woodsville, if it's not reflected in the minutes of
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
40
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·that nonpublic session, would you agree that they
·2· · · ·didn't intend to delegate all of their power and
·3· · · ·authority?
·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·5· ·Q.· You can answer.
·6· ·A.· I wouldn't, I wouldn't say that.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.· Then how would you or how do you have the
·8· · · ·understanding, again if that there's no direct
·9· · · ·statement in those minutes from the nonpublic
10· · · ·session, how, then, would you have the
11· · · ·understanding that you do, that when the board of
12· · · ·selectmen delegated to you the authority and the
13· · · ·responsibility to review contracts and waive
14· · · ·conflicts of interest with legal matters relating
15· · · ·to Woodsville, where does that understanding or
16· · · ·where would that understanding come from?
17· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
18· ·Q.· You can answer.
19· ·A.· Well, I was there.
20· ·Q.· Okay.
21· ·A.· As was Jennifer Boucher.· And I think their motion
22· · · ·speaks pretty clearly too of their intent, because
23· · · ·it says to give all, the word "all" is used there.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
41
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Not having been there I'm trying to walk myself
·2· · · ·through this, if you will.· So the board of
·3· · · ·selectmen, one way or another, whoever presented
·4· · · ·the idea, they discussed it, they took a vote, and
·5· · · ·then there are minutes of what they discussed and
·6· · · ·the outcome of the vote, obviously.· I'm trying to
·7· · · ·understand the basis of your understanding that
·8· · · ·when the board of selectmen assigned or delegated
·9· · · ·that role and the responsibility to you to make
10· · · ·decisions with respect to legal matter relating to
11· · · ·Woodsville, that the board knew they were
12· · · ·transferring everything over to you and they
13· · · ·intended to transfer, and they were left with
14· · · ·nothing.· That sort of that final step in my head
15· · · ·that I'm trying to sort out:· What, if anything,
16· · · ·more do you have that would explain your
17· · · ·understanding of that?
18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection to form.· Asked and
19· · · ·answered.
20· ·Q.· Do you have anything in addition to what you've
21· · · ·already stated now that I have explained a little
22· · · ·more of, sort of, the line of my questioning and
23· · · ·what I'm trying to understand?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
42
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· So are you asking do I have any more in writing or
·2· · · ·any more in general.
·3· ·Q.· Anything more anywhere in whatever form.
·4· ·A.· So in writing, like I said, I'd have to go back and
·5· · · ·look at the minutes to see exactly what notes the
·6· · · ·chair took at that meeting.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.
·8· ·A.· But the board members that made up that board are
·9· · · ·still in town and could certainly be brought in for
10· · · ·questioning if you want to know what they were
11· · · ·thinking at the time.
12· ·Q.· So they may or may not have something more to add
13· · · ·on that topic; correct?
14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
15· ·Q.· Yeah?
16· ·A.· I guarantee they would all come staunchly with the
17· · · ·same definitive information of what they intended.
18· ·Q.· Okay.· What, if anything, did the members who were
19· · · ·on the board of selectmen in 2022 when it appears
20· · · ·the events that gave rise to this lawsuit that we
21· · · ·are involved in right now, what, if anything, did
22· · · ·those members of that board have to say, if
23· · · ·anything, about whether they still had that power
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
43
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·and authority to review contracts and waive
·2· · · ·conflicts of interest, what, if anything, did those
·3· · · ·members say?
·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·5· ·Q.· You can answer.
·6· ·A.· Specifically the board that made that motion did
·7· · · ·not want each of them to be acting independently,
·8· · · ·and they wanted there to be a single point of
·9· · · ·contact in decision-making, and they wanted that to
10· · · ·be me.
11· ·Q.· Okay.· And then in 2022 when the events occurred
12· · · ·that gave rise to this lawsuit, what did the
13· · · ·members of the board of selectmen say, if anything,
14· · · ·about whether or not the board of selectmen could
15· · · ·still review contracts and waive conflicts of
16· · · ·interest, those sorts of things?
17· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
18· ·Q.· You can answer.
19· ·A.· You mean the newly constituted board?
20· ·Q.· In two, who -- not having worked with them so I
21· · · ·know that there were elections and that sort of
22· · · ·thing --
23· ·A.· Yup.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
44
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· -- so the board members that existed and were on
·2· · · ·the board of selectmen in 2022, what, if anything,
·3· · · ·did they say about whether or not they believed
·4· · · ·they still had, I don't want to use the word
·5· · · ·"power" because it's a little bit too stern, but
·6· · · ·the authority or had the ability to review
·7· · · ·contracts and waive conflicts of interest?
·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·9· ·Q.· You can answer.
10· ·A.· So after March of 2022 when the new board was
11· · · ·constituted at the town meeting, this issue came up
12· · · ·again during a select board meeting, and Kevin
13· · · ·Knapp attempted to make a motion to remove
14· · · ·authority.
15· · · · · · · · ·At the time the select board chair
16· · · ·stepped in and said, I don't remember his exact
17· · · ·words, but basically, Brigitte has that authority.
18· · · ·We gave it to her for a reason.· She's the only
19· · · ·person that's going to, that should be doing this.
20· · · ·And Kevin's motion never got a second and the
21· · · ·motion failed.
22· · · · · · · · ·During some of those meetings at the
23· · · ·time, board members from the previous board who had
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
45
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·originally made that motion for the intended
·2· · · ·purpose of giving me full authority over all legal
·3· · · ·matters related to the Woodsville Fire District
·4· · · ·also stood up at the select board meeting to
·5· · · ·express to Kevin Knapp that the intent was for the
·6· · · ·town manager to have that full authority and to be
·7· · · ·the single point of contact for decision-making and
·8· · · ·anything else related to legal matters related to
·9· · · ·Woodsville Fire District.
10· ·Q.· Okay.
11· ·A.· So they reiterated what they had done in another
12· · · ·public meeting.
13· ·Q.· Okay.· And who, if anybody, said that it was the
14· · · ·intent that the board of selectmen then would no
15· · · ·longer have any right or power to review any
16· · · ·contracts and waive any conflicts, again with
17· · · ·respect to legal matters related to Woodsville?
18· · · ·Who, if anybody, said that?
19· ·A.· The board of selectmen that made the motion and
20· · · ·authorized me to do so to have that authority.
21· ·Q.· So they, they in one step, then, they, the members
22· · · ·stated that they were delegating this authority and
23· · · ·the responsibility to the town manager, and that
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
46
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·they were extinguish -- "they" meaning the members
·2· · · ·on the board of selectmen back then -- said that
·3· · · ·they were extinguishing or erasing their authority
·4· · · ·and power to review contracts and waive conflicts
·5· · · ·of interest; is that correct?
·6· ·A.· They were very explicit about that, yes.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.
·8· ·A.· Related to the Woodsville Fire District only.
·9· ·Q.· Correct.· So in, when this lawsuit that we are
10· · · ·involved in right now that the Town of Haverhill
11· · · ·brought against DTC, if that is accurate, then why
12· · · ·were, why weren't you the one or the individual for
13· · · ·the Town who signed the complaint or the petition
14· · · ·that got filed to the court to initiate this
15· · · ·lawsuit?
16· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
17· ·Q.· You can answer.
18· ·A.· Because it was an action the board of selectmen
19· · · ·took.
20· ·Q.· Does this lawsuit or what about this lawsuit
21· · · ·relates to legal matters relating to Woodsville?
22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
23· ·Q.· You can answer.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
47
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· Say it again.
·2· ·Q.· Yeah.
·3· ·A.· What about ...
·4· ·Q.· What about the present lawsuit that we are here
·5· · · ·today for involves the phrase that we have been
·6· · · ·using over and over again, legal matters relating
·7· · · ·to Woodsville?
·8· ·A.· Well, this lawsuit is about the tax rate setting
·9· · · ·matter and what DTC purports that they did to
10· · · ·assist the Town in that matter.
11· · · · · · · · ·And the tax rate setting matter was
12· · · ·directly connected to Articles 27 and 28, which was
13· · · ·directly connected to the legislation, which was
14· · · ·directly connected to the original lawsuit that
15· · · ·Woodsville filed against the Town of Haverhill.
16· · · ·They are all tied to one another, all about highway
17· · · ·funding.· The Town funding the district's
18· · · ·operation.
19· ·Q.· So if it's all tied to and relates to legal matters
20· · · ·relating to Woodsville, then why didn't you sign
21· · · ·the petition or the complaint that initiate this
22· · · ·lawsuit?
23· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
48
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· You can answer.
·2· ·A.· Because it was an action the select board wanted to
·3· · · ·take not -- yes, it's an action the select board
·4· · · ·wanted to make.
·5· ·Q.· Okay.· But if I understand what you were saying
·6· · · ·previously, when the board of selectmen assigned or
·7· · · ·delegated to you the role and the responsibility of
·8· · · ·making decisions and taking actions with respect to
·9· · · ·all legal matters relating to Woodsville, and your,
10· · · ·you just stated that this current lawsuit relates
11· · · ·to legal matters relating to Woodsville, the board
12· · · ·of selectmen couldn't have or wouldn't have signed
13· · · ·the petition.· So how did they sign the petition
14· · · ·then?
15· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
16· ·Q.· You can answer.
17· ·A.· Well, I think that this particular lawsuit is about
18· · · ·a bill.
19· ·Q.· Okay.
20· ·A.· And the bill has been filed with the Town from DTC.
21· · · ·And so for them it's about the bill and not wanting
22· · · ·to pay the bill because they believe that DTC was
23· · · ·never hired by the Town.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
49
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· So with your, with respect to your role as town
·2· · · ·manager and what your understanding is with respect
·3· · · ·to the delegation of the board of selectmen to you
·4· · · ·of all legal matters relating to Woodsville, does
·5· · · ·this current lawsuit then fall within the
·6· · · ·parameters or fall under that heading of all legal
·7· · · ·matters relating to Woodsville?
·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·9· ·Q.· You can answer.
10· ·A.· I'm not sure how to answer that.
11· ·Q.· Okay.· I just want to make sure, you understand the
12· · · ·question but you don't know the answer to it; is
13· · · ·that accurate?
14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
15· ·Q.· You can answer.
16· ·A.· Ask me the question again.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· So you've previously stated today that it's
18· · · ·your understanding and based upon what individual
19· · · ·members said with respect to the assignment of
20· · · ·making decisions and having authority and
21· · · ·responsibility with respect to all legal matters
22· · · ·relating to Woodsville, board of selectmen assigned
23· · · ·all of its power and authority over to you.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
50
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · ·And then with respect to this lawsuit I
·2· · · ·asked you if this present lawsuit relates to all
·3· · · ·legal matters relating to Woodsville, and I'm
·4· · · ·trying to find out if you would put this lawsuit
·5· · · ·under that heading of all legal matters --
·6· ·A.· I personally would not.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.
·8· ·A.· Because from my perspective DTC was never hired.
·9· · · ·So from my perspective, this lawsuit is more about
10· · · ·the fact that this bill was filed with a single
11· · · ·select member at his personal address for legal
12· · · ·services they purported to have provided to this
13· · · ·town, but they were hired to do that.
14· · · · · · · · ·And they had, Chris Hawkins has such a
15· · · ·gross conflict it could never have been waived, so
16· · · ·they could never have been hired anyway.
17· ·Q.· Okay.
18· ·A.· So from my perspective, having full legal authority
19· · · ·over all matters related to Woodsville Fire
20· · · ·District, I certainly would never have hired Chris
21· · · ·Hawkins to serve us in this respect.· And so this
22· · · ·is like a separate matter.· This is between the
23· · · ·Town and DTC; and from that perspective it would be
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
51
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·the board of selectmen who would be in a position
·2· · · ·of filing a suit if they felt that that was
·3· · · ·something that they wanted to do, which is what
·4· · · ·they did.
·5· ·Q.· Okay.· Let me ask, I don't want to say the same
·6· · · ·question, but let me ask a follow-up question based
·7· · · ·upon what I understand you just said.
·8· · · · · · · · ·So this present lawsuit does not, it does
·9· · · ·not relate to, is not connected to all, the quote,
10· · · ·all the legal matters relating to Woodsville, so it
11· · · ·doesn't fit or fall under that category; correct?
12· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
13· ·Q.· You can answer.
14· ·A.· I think it's -- no, I think.· It's been ...
15· ·Q.· It's outside of that.
16· ·A.· It's outside of that realm.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· Okay.· So with respect to the work or the
18· · · ·legal services that DTC says that it performed, the
19· · · ·things that it did on behalf of the Town, why did
20· · · ·DTC do the things that it did?· What does it relate
21· · · ·to?
22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
23· ·Q.· You can answer.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
52
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· My opinion?· Are you asking for my opinion?
·2· ·Q.· Well, there's a thorny issue there because your
·3· · · ·opinion not as a person, but your assessment as the
·4· · · ·town manager, correct, yes?
·5· ·A.· As to why they, say it again, then.
·6· ·Q.· Why they say, because you weren't there when they
·7· · · ·were doing things, so we are just going to take it
·8· · · ·as that -- they are the ones saying they did
·9· · · ·certain things.· We will take that at face value --
10· · · ·but with respect to the things, the legal services
11· · · ·or the legal work that DTC is saying that it did or
12· · · ·they did on behalf of the Town of Haverhill, why
13· · · ·did they do those things?
14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
15· ·Q.· You can answer.
16· ·A.· Like you said, I wasn't involved in 99 percent of
17· · · ·whatever it is they did do behind the scenes there,
18· · · ·but my understanding and the only connection that I
19· · · ·have seen is that Chris Hawkins had litigated
20· · · ·against the Town of Haverhill on behalf of the
21· · · ·Woodsville Fire District, and he was still pursuing
22· · · ·that in a different way.
23· ·Q.· So when Chris Hawkins represented Woodsville
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
53
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·Village District, he also was with a different
·2· · · ·firm?· He wasn't then employed with DTC law firm;
·3· · · ·correct?
·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·5· ·Q.· You can answer.
·6· ·A.· That is true.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.· And it's your understanding that the lawyers
·8· · · ·at DTC or DTC did what they are saying they did,
·9· · · ·the legal services that they are saying they
10· · · ·provided for the Town of Haverhill, they actually
11· · · ·did those things to benefit Woodsville Village
12· · · ·District; correct?
13· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
14· ·Q.· You can answer.
15· ·A.· I believe so.
16· ·Q.· Okay.· Who, who for the Town of Haverhill approved
17· · · ·or authorized DTC to do the work and provide the
18· · · ·legal services that they say they provided for the
19· · · ·Town?
20· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
21· ·Q.· You can answer.
22· ·A.· Well, Steve Robbins, Village District employee and
23· · · ·resident, signed documents for DTC in the district
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
54
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·office.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.
·3· ·A.· And that's about as much as I know about.
·4· ·Q.· Okay.· So do you know who, who else or who the
·5· · · ·other members were, if any, who also agreed and
·6· · · ·authorized DTC to perform the legal services that
·7· · · ·they did?
·8· ·A.· There are no meetings on record, no minutes, so I
·9· · · ·couldn't answer that question.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· What, if anything, do you know about legal
11· · · ·services that DTC is saying that it provided to the
12· · · ·Town, specifically the board of selectmen, that
13· · · ·they say are connected to or related to personnel
14· · · ·matters?
15· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
16· ·Q.· You can answer.
17· ·A.· There's one brief entry on an invoice related to my
18· · · ·review and my evaluation.
19· ·Q.· Okay.· And what does that time entry on that
20· · · ·invoice mean to you or what's your understanding of
21· · · ·it?
22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
23· ·Q.· You can answer.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
55
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· The assumption was that at some point one of board
·2· · · ·members sent DTC my evaluation for review, and it
·3· · · ·was not a significant amount of time, so I have no
·4· · · ·idea the context of that.
·5· ·Q.· Okay.· And so do you know which board members were
·6· · · ·involved in either communications or activity
·7· · · ·related to that supposed one-time entry?
·8· ·A.· I don't know who.· I don't, I wasn't involved.
·9· ·Q.· Okay.· Was this problem or the issue with respect
10· · · ·to the New Hampshire Department of Revenue
11· · · ·Administration, the DRA as we have been referring
12· · · ·to it today, this problem or issue with respect to
13· · · ·DRA not setting the tax rate for the Town of
14· · · ·Haverhill, does that or does it not relate to or
15· · · ·fit under the heading of, so to speak, all legal
16· · · ·matters relating to Woodsville?
17· ·A.· It does.
18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
19· ·Q.· It does?· Okay.· So when this DRA tax setting issue
20· · · ·came about -- not a very articulate way of saying
21· · · ·it -- began with DRA issuing the letter that it did
22· · · ·to the Town, what was the status of Woodsville's
23· · · ·lawsuit against the Town of Haverhill, the one that
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
56
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·started, I believe, in 2020 or earlier?· What was,
·2· · · ·do you recall what the status was at that -- when
·3· · · ·this DRA tax setting issue came about, what was the
·4· · · ·status of that lawsuit?
·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·6· ·Q.· You can answer.
·7· ·A.· We were still in the middle of settlement
·8· · · ·finalization.
·9· ·Q.· Okay.· Not having been involved, what does that
10· · · ·mean?· Can you provide --
11· ·A.· We still owed the Village of Woodsville Fire
12· · · ·District a second settlement payment.
13· ·Q.· Okay.· Was there still a lawsuit going on in the
14· · · ·court?
15· ·A.· It was not, we were, we had, we had negotiated a
16· · · ·settlement and we were in the middle of executing
17· · · ·that settlement.
18· ·Q.· There was a settlement agreement that had been
19· · · ·finalized; correct?
20· ·A.· Yes.
21· ·Q.· And then what, if anything, do you know as far as
22· · · ·what documents had been filed with the court in
23· · · ·connection with that lawsuit, again, when this DRA
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
57
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·tax setting issue reared its head?
·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·3· ·Q.· You can answer.
·4· ·A.· I don't recall what had been filed before the
·5· · · ·letter got issued.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.
·7· ·A.· But it was in January and that we were, at the end
·8· · · ·of January we made the second settlement payment.
·9· · · ·And then after that there was something filed with
10· · · ·the court, I believe in February, on letting them
11· · · ·know we had finished.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· What as of, we will take it as of February
13· · · ·of 2023 --
14· ·A.· '3.
15· ·Q.· Okay.· As of February 2023, the Town of Haverhill
16· · · ·had made this agreed-upon second payment to the, to
17· · · ·Woodsville; correct?
18· ·A.· Yes.
19· ·Q.· What, as far as your understanding as town manager
20· · · ·at that point, what else was there required by that
21· · · ·settlement that Haverhill had to do, you know, to
22· · · ·or for Woodsville?· Was there anything left --
23· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
58
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Go ahead.· You can answer.
·2· ·A.· With regards the, just the lawsuit?
·3· ·Q.· This lawsuit and the settlement, yes.
·4· ·A.· So after we finally filed with the court letting
·5· · · ·them know we had executed the settlement agreement,
·6· · · ·I believe that would be the end of it.· There would
·7· · · ·be nothing else that we would need to file with the
·8· · · ·court.
·9· ·Q.· Okay.· But in addition, with respect to the
10· · · ·settlement agreement, what each party said it was
11· · · ·going to do or not to do, so the typical agreement,
12· · · ·Town of Haverhill makes a second payment to
13· · · ·Woodsville Village District, and it was the second
14· · · ·payment of two; correct?
15· ·A.· Yes.
16· ·Q.· Okay.· What additional or what other things did the
17· · · ·Town of Haverhill still need to do to carry out its
18· · · ·half of the agreement, so to speak?· Was there
19· · · ·anything else?
20· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
21· ·Q.· You can answer.
22· ·A.· There wouldn't have been anything after we
23· · · ·finalized the settlement.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
59
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Take a look at that and we
·2· · · ·will mark it.
·3· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Can we go off the record and
·4· · · ·take a quick break.
·5· · · · · · · · ·(Recess taken.)
·6· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 1, 3/6/20 Town of Haverhill
·7· · · ·Nonpublic Meeting Minutes, marked for
·8· · · ·identification.)
·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Back the record.
10· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Okay.· So we stipulate that
11· · · ·all objections are preserved.
12· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Yeah.· And I would just add
13· · · ·without, without counsel for the Town having to
14· · · ·object upon the presentation of each question,
15· · · ·especially with respect to form.
16· ·BY MR. SOUCY:
17· ·Q.· Okay.· So, Ms. Codling, I have sent over across the
18· · · ·table a document, two-page document to you.· First
19· · · ·page is essentially a coversheet, if you will.
20· · · ·Once you and your attorney have taken a look at it
21· · · ·just so it's on the record, just let me know when
22· · · ·you've read over and you're ready for a question.
23· · · · · · · · ·(Pause.)
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
60
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· I'm good.
·2· ·Q.· All set?
·3· ·A.· Uh-huh.
·4· ·Q.· Sorry.
·5· ·A.· That's okay.· Yes.· Yes.
·6· ·Q.· Is that an uh-uh or yes?· Everybody does it.· Okay.
·7· · · ·So back on the record, still under oath after a
·8· · · ·brief break.· And I have handed you a document and
·9· · · ·marked it as Exhibit No. 1 to your deposition.
10· · · · · · · · ·Can you tell me what this document is?
11· · · ·Do you recognize it?
12· ·A.· Minutes to the nonpublic meeting of March 6th,
13· · · ·2020.
14· ·Q.· Okay.· And two thirds of the way down the page
15· · · ·there is just barely under three lines that look
16· · · ·like it was highlighted.· It's slightly shaded.· It
17· · · ·starts out with, Darwin made the motion.· Do you
18· · · ·see that sentence?
19· ·A.· I do.
20· ·Q.· Okay.· With respect to that sentence there, is that
21· · · ·the motion through which the board of selectmen
22· · · ·back in 2020 assigned to you or delegated to you
23· · · ·the power and the responsibility to make decisions
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
61
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·regarding or over legal matters related to the
·2· · · ·Woodsville Precinct?
·3· ·A.· It does.· It is.
·4· ·Q.· Okay.· And this is, at the top it states this is
·5· · · ·the meeting minutes, looks like from the, or
·6· · · ·appears to have been from the nonpublic session?
·7· ·A.· Yes.
·8· ·Q.· Okay.· Having attended a good number of these board
·9· · · ·of selectmen meetings in this town, is this
10· · · ·typically, again up at the caption or top of the
11· · · ·page here, is it typically how the meeting minutes
12· · · ·would be indicated if or when they are from the
13· · · ·nonpublic session?
14· ·A.· Most of the time.
15· ·Q.· Okay.· Are there, well, does the board of selectmen
16· · · ·and has the board of selectmen generally produced
17· · · ·two sets of meetings, one for the public and then a
18· · · ·separate one for the nonpublic meeting sessions?
19· ·A.· Yes, there's two sets of minutes if they go into
20· · · ·nonpublic.
21· ·Q.· Okay.· So this is consistent with the minutes from
22· · · ·a nonpublic meeting or nonpublic session of the
23· · · ·board of selectmen?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
62
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· Yes.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.· So with respect to, again the phrase that we
·3· · · ·have been saying over and over again so far, the
·4· · · ·legal matters related to the Woodsville Precinct,
·5· · · ·back in March of 2020 what do you recall your
·6· · · ·understanding of what that phrase "legal matters"
·7· · · ·related to?
·8· ·A.· Literally anything.· Literally any legal matter.
·9· ·Q.· Okay.· So it was, your understanding then was that
10· · · ·it also involved even things beyond the assessment,
11· · · ·appropriation and distribution of property tax
12· · · ·dollars to Woodsville?· It encompassed even things
13· · · ·further in a broader scope of subject areas than
14· · · ·those things?
15· ·A.· The collection, distribution of taxes isn't a legal
16· · · ·matter.
17· ·Q.· I'm sorry?· It's what?
18· ·A.· That's not normally a legal matter, the
19· · · ·distribution of taxes.
20· ·Q.· Okay.· So then what falls within that phrase "legal
21· · · ·matters"?
22· ·A.· So literally anytime we would need to confer with
23· · · ·legal, obtain legal or file anything that would be
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
63
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·a legal filing would be me.
·2· ·Q.· So if there were a legal dispute between the Town
·3· · · ·and Woodsville Precinct, as it's referred to
·4· · · ·here --
·5· ·A.· That's another name.
·6· ·Q.· -- we are going to throw a third term in here now
·7· · · ·just to indicate Woodsville -- but if there were a
·8· · · ·dispute between the Town of Haverhill and
·9· · · ·Woodsville relating to a vehicle that attorneys
10· · · ·were needed, that would be a legal matter?
11· ·A.· Say that again.
12· ·Q.· Yeah.· I'm just trying to get an understanding of
13· · · ·this phrase "legal matters" in relation to
14· · · ·Woodsville.· If there were or had been some dispute
15· · · ·between the Town and Woodsville over a vehicle or
16· · · ·about a vehicle -- I'm trying to take it outside
17· · · ·of, like real estate taxes or property taxes -- was
18· · · ·it your understanding that when the board of
19· · · ·selectmen delegated that authority to you and
20· · · ·responsibility to you that it also would have
21· · · ·covered some legal dispute over a vehicle somehow
22· · · ·between the Town and Woodsville?
23· ·A.· So at that time any legal matters in general were
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
64
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·in my ball court, they were my responsibility.· And
·2· · · ·so with regard to Woodsville Precinct, it would be
·3· · · ·exclusively mine.
·4· ·Q.· Okay.· And that would still be consistent with what
·5· · · ·you testified earlier today as well that when, your
·6· · · ·understanding was when the board delegated that
·7· · · ·authority and responsibility to you, again with
·8· · · ·respect to all legal matters relating to
·9· · · ·Woodsville, that the board retained or kept no
10· · · ·authority for itself from that date forward?
11· ·A.· Over Woodsville matters, yes.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· Over Woodsville matters; correct.· Okay.
13· · · ·When, just a little while ago I was asking you
14· · · ·about the lawsuit that Woodsville brought against
15· · · ·the Town in connection with tax payments and tax
16· · · ·money to Woodsville.· We've already covered that
17· · · ·that case, that legal matter was settled.
18· · · · · · · · ·There was, do you recall what there was
19· · · ·for documents that the two parties signed to
20· · · ·document or memorialize the settlement?· Do you
21· · · ·recall what any of those documents were?
22· ·A.· The settlement agreement.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· All right.· Do you recall anything in
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
65
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·addition to the actual settlement agreement?
·2· ·A.· Not that I recall.
·3· ·Q.· Okay.· Who signed, on behalf of the Town of
·4· · · ·Haverhill, who signed the settlement agreement?
·5· ·A.· The chair, the chair, Fred Garofalo signed that.
·6· ·Q.· Do you, so you recall that Fred Garofalo, the
·7· · · ·chairman of the board of selectmen, signed the
·8· · · ·settlement agreement between the Town and
·9· · · ·Woodsville?
10· ·A.· He did, after settlement negotiations.
11· ·Q.· Okay.· Prior to that were there any other documents
12· · · ·in connection with the settlement of that lawsuit
13· · · ·that the Town signed?
14· ·A.· I don't recall.
15· ·Q.· Okay.
16· ·A.· Probably, but I can't recall specifically.· It's
17· · · ·been a while.
18· ·Q.· What role, if any, did you have in connection with
19· · · ·the settlement negotiations?
20· ·A.· I was part of the settlement negotiations.
21· ·Q.· And did you decide whether or not the case was or
22· · · ·whether or not the Town agreed to settle the case?
23· ·A.· It was -- no, the board voted.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
66
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Do you know why it wasn't your decision?
·2· ·A.· I don't recall exactly how that played out, other
·3· · · ·than the fact that we were going to spending a lot
·4· · · ·of money; and the final authority on spending that
·5· · · ·kind of money is up to the board.
·6· ·Q.· The payment of the money was what was needed to
·7· · · ·bring about the resolution of the dispute between
·8· · · ·the parties, though, right?
·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
10· ·Q.· You can answer.
11· ·A.· Say it again.
12· ·Q.· Yeah, the payment of the money by the Town to
13· · · ·Woodsville was part of what was agreed upon to
14· · · ·resolve the legal dispute between the towns,
15· · · ·though, right?
16· ·A.· That was the biggest component of settling was
17· · · ·whether there was going to be money exchanged.
18· ·Q.· But the decision as to whether or not the Town was
19· · · ·going to pay that money wasn't solely your
20· · · ·decision?
21· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
22· ·Q.· Correct?
23· ·A.· Even as town manager I can't spend that kind of
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
67
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·money without the approval of select board.· I can
·2· · · ·only spend what's in the budget, what's been
·3· · · ·approved at town meeting; that's under my
·4· · · ·authority.
·5· ·Q.· And this was a legal matter relating to Woodsville;
·6· · · ·correct?
·7· ·A.· It was.
·8· ·Q.· Whose decision was it to post the documents
·9· · · ·relating to this lawsuit on the Town's website?
10· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
11· ·A.· The select board.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you know why they decided or it decided
13· · · ·to do that?
14· ·A.· To be transparent.
15· ·Q.· Whose decision was it to post the documents that
16· · · ·are on the Town's website with respect to this
17· · · ·lawsuit here between the Town of Haverhill and DTC?
18· ·A.· The board, for the same reasons.
19· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 2, 1/9/22 Town of Haverhill
20· · · ·Meeting Minutes, marked for identification.)
21· ·Q.· Okay.· Have you had a chance to look at the
22· · · ·document that I have just given you?
23· ·A.· Yes.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
68
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· And it's been marked as Exhibit No. 2.· At the top
·2· · · ·it says that it is an Emergency Select Board
·3· · · ·Meeting, and these are the minutes of that from
·4· · · ·January 9th, 2022; correct?
·5· ·A.· Yes.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.· Third paragraph down is Town employees
·7· · · ·present, and it appears that both you and --
·8· ·A.· Jennifer.
·9· ·Q.· -- Ms. Boucher were present; is that correct?
10· ·A.· That's correct; yes.
11· ·Q.· Second-to-last paragraph from the bottom there's a
12· · · ·discussion about Drummond Woodsum attorneys.· Who
13· · · ·are they?
14· ·A.· They are the attorneys that we had been using since
15· · · ·the fall of 2019 on Woodsville-related matters.
16· ·Q.· Okay.· And then on the second to third line it
17· · · ·indicates that there was a conflict of interest
18· · · ·apparently that Drummond Woodsum had.· What was
19· · · ·that conflict of interest?
20· ·A.· It was that they were representing, they had
21· · · ·represented both the school and Mountain Lakes
22· · · ·District in various things in the past.
23· ·Q.· What way, if any, were those prior representations
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
69
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·or the subject matter of those prior
·2· · · ·representations related to each other; do you know?
·3· ·A.· To each other's representations, like the school
·4· · · ·and the district --
·5· ·Q.· Correct.
·6· ·A.· -- with the town?· Or just --
·7· ·Q.· With each other.· The school and the district.
·8· ·A.· I don't think that it was a conflict between the
·9· · · ·school and district.· It was that Drummond Woodsum
10· · · ·had represented the school district in the past and
11· · · ·they had represented Mountain Lakes District in the
12· · · ·past.· And so they wanted to make sure they could
13· · · ·clear any conflicts that might be there before they
14· · · ·continued to represent us.
15· ·Q.· So step by step.· And then what was, as you
16· · · ·understand it, what was the conflict in this
17· · · ·situation here as of January of 2022 that Drummond
18· · · ·Woodsum believed that it had as between the school
19· · · ·district and the Town itself?
20· ·A.· They at that point weren't sure they truly had a
21· · · ·conflict.· They had represented both parties, so
22· · · ·they wanted to make sure there was not a conflict.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· And what's your understanding as far as
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
70
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·whether or not there was actually a conflict?
·2· ·A.· There was no conflict in the end.
·3· ·Q.· Did Drummond Woodsum produce or generate and send
·4· · · ·to the Town a waiver of conflict of interest?
·5· ·A.· Yes.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.· And who signed that?
·7· ·A.· I did.
·8· ·Q.· Okay.· If there wasn't a conflict of interest, why
·9· · · ·did you as the town manager then sign a waiver of
10· · · ·the conflict of interest?
11· ·A.· The conflict of interest waiver basically said that
12· · · ·there was no conflict; just that they had
13· · · ·represented those parties and we understood that.
14· ·Q.· So is it fair to say that it operated more as a
15· · · ·disclosure than an actual waiver?· A waiver of
16· · · ·something that didn't exist is a little
17· · · ·problematic.· Is it fair to say that the waiver of
18· · · ·conflict of interest document that you signed in
19· · · ·connection with Drummond Woodsum then, 2022, was
20· · · ·more of a disclosure?· They were disclosing, sort
21· · · ·of, what they had for past representation, legal
22· · · ·representation?
23· ·A.· Perhaps it could be seen that way.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
71
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Okay.· How did you see it then?
·2· ·A.· I guess that would be a good, a good categorization
·3· · · ·of that, that they were disclosing that they had
·4· · · ·represented the school district, they had
·5· · · ·represented the Mountain Lakes District, and that
·6· · · ·they didn't feel that those representations had any
·7· · · ·impact on the Town, in their representation of the
·8· · · ·Town, and I agreed.
·9· ·Q.· So your opinion was as well that there wasn't
10· · · ·actually a conflict of interest; is that accurate?
11· ·A.· Nothing, nothing of any significance.
12· ·Q.· There was a conflict, it was just minor, or there
13· · · ·wasn't a conflict?
14· ·A.· I wouldn't have seen it as a real conflict.
15· ·Q.· And do you know what the school district did with
16· · · ·respect to any kind of waiver that Drummond Woodsum
17· · · ·sent over to it?
18· ·A.· Originally they did, the school board voted not to
19· · · ·sign it.· And then on the 12th they were made aware
20· · · ·that by not signing it, it would keep Drummond
21· · · ·Woodsum from representing the Town; and so they
22· · · ·immediately went back in and signed it.
23· ·Q.· Why did the school board initially decide that they
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
72
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·weren't going to sign it?
·2· ·A.· I wasn't there, but the school board chair stated
·3· · · ·that they misunderstood what it was for.
·4· ·Q.· What did he give for an explanation as to what the
·5· · · ·misunderstanding was?
·6· ·A.· That's all he said was that they misunderstood.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.· What is your understanding with respect to
·8· · · ·the members of the board of selectmen and the board
·9· · · ·of selectmen retaining or hiring or not hiring DTC
10· · · ·Lawyers with respect to the DRA rate setting issue?
11· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
12· ·Q.· You can answer.
13· ·A.· Can you say that again, the beginning of it.
14· ·Q.· Yeah.· With respect to the members on the board of
15· · · ·selectmen, what was their understanding or their
16· · · ·position with respect to the board of selectmen
17· · · ·hiring or retaining DTC Lawyers for or in
18· · · ·connection with the DRA rate setting issue?
19· ·A.· I don't want to speculate what they believed or
20· · · ·what they thought.· The only individual who ever
21· · · ·made a statement was Steve Robbins, who said it was
22· · · ·their intent to do so.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· And is that what he stated directly to you?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
73
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· Yes.
·2· ·Q.· What explanation, if any, did he give for his
·3· · · ·position about having intended to retain DTC
·4· · · ·Lawyers?
·5· ·A.· I don't recall him ever giving me an explanation.
·6· ·Q.· It was just that statement itself standing alone?
·7· ·A.· Basically.· Basically.· There was no in-depth
·8· · · ·explanation on what the board was doing.
·9· ·Q.· Okay.
10· ·A.· Or why.
11· ·Q.· And do you recall any other member of the board of
12· · · ·selectmen stating or communicating to you that they
13· · · ·intended to hire or retain DTC for the property,
14· · · ·the rate setting issue?
15· ·A.· Directly to me?
16· ·Q.· Communicated in any way, yeah, spoken?· Email?
17· · · ·Text?
18· ·A.· There was a public statement read on January 17th
19· · · ·that was coauthored or significantly edited by
20· · · ·Chris Hawkins that made a statement that the board
21· · · ·intended to hire DTC.
22· ·Q.· Okay.· Who else on the board of selectmen, if
23· · · ·anybody, also stated or communicated to you that it
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
74
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·was their intent as members of the board of
·2· · · ·selectmen to hire or retain DTC in connection with
·3· · · ·the DRA rate setting matter?
·4· ·A.· Other than that January 17th meeting I don't recall
·5· · · ·any other board members specifically saying that.
·6· · · ·Nothing sticks in my mind.
·7· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 3, 5/15/24 Email, marked for
·8· · · ·identification.)
·9· · · · · · · · ·(Pause.)
10· ·Q.· Okay.· So I gave you a document that is a string or
11· · · ·chain of emails, which the original document is
12· · · ·January 11th of 2022.· You've had a, and January
13· · · ·10th, 2022.· You've had a chance to review this
14· · · ·with your attorney?
15· ·A.· We both looked at it, yes.
16· ·Q.· Just want to make sure that the record -- sorry.
17· · · ·Just making sure the record is there that you guys
18· · · ·have looked at it.
19· ·A.· Yes.
20· ·Q.· Okay.· Yes.· At the bottom of the first page of
21· · · ·this document it's an email that says it's from
22· · · ·you.· It's dated January 11th, 2023, and this
23· · · ·particular email is at 2:28 p.m. to Steve Robbins.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
75
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·Do you see where that begins?
·2· ·A.· I do.
·3· ·Q.· Okay.· And then it goes on to the second page.
·4· · · ·This is an email that you sent to Steve Robbins who
·5· · · ·was the, at the time was the chairman of the board
·6· · · ·of selectmen; correct?
·7· ·A.· He was probably the interim chair at that point.
·8· ·Q.· The interim chair or vice chair, right?
·9· ·A.· Yeah, I don't remember exactly when.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· So four paragraphs from the bottom it
11· · · ·states, The issue we face is not having a tax rate
12· · · ·set.· Do you see that line in that paragraph?
13· ·A.· I do, yup.
14· ·Q.· Okay.· So the issue was not really with the lawsuit
15· · · ·that Woodsville had brought against the Town of
16· · · ·Haverhill and everything that been pled or alleged
17· · · ·in that lawsuit; this was a separate issue of the
18· · · ·DRA delaying or refusing to set the tax rate for
19· · · ·the Town in 2000-, dragged into 2023, but it
20· · · ·started actually in 2022; correct?
21· ·A.· Which part?
22· ·Q.· I --
23· ·A.· The settlement component?· The lawsuit started in
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
76
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·early 2020.
·2· ·Q.· Right.· But this line, these two lines here, The
·3· · · ·issue we face with not having the tax rate set.· So
·4· · · ·what you and Steve are communicating about is the
·5· · · ·DRA not setting the tax rate, not anything
·6· · · ·specifically that was filed in connection with the
·7· · · ·lawsuit that Woodsville brought against the Town of
·8· · · ·Haverhill; correct?
·9· ·A.· It is connected and that's why I go on to say that
10· · · ·it's not our fault or anything we have any control
11· · · ·over, because the tax rate not being set was due to
12· · · ·Article 27 and 28, which was due to highway
13· · · ·funding, which is the same thing we were litigating
14· · · ·over with regards to the lawsuit.· It was an
15· · · ·ongoing problem.
16· ·Q.· So all of this came about not as a result of or the
17· · · ·fault of anyone in the town doing anything wrong;
18· · · ·correct?
19· ·A.· Correct.
20· ·Q.· Okay.
21· ·A.· Well, town government.
22· ·Q.· Well, prior to this, generally a year prior to
23· · · ·this, January, about January of 2022, you had
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
77
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·emailed the DRA a number of times and gave them or
·2· · · ·forewarned them about Article 27 and Article 28
·3· · · ·that it was, something was going to be coming;
·4· · · ·correct?
·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·6· ·Q.· Go ahead.· You can answer.
·7· ·A.· So part of the review process for the warrant is
·8· · · ·for us to the send the warrant to the DRA for a
·9· · · ·pre-reveal, and that's what I had done.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· And is that all you had done with respect to
11· · · ·that process?
12· ·A.· No.· I had communicated the sentiments of the
13· · · ·select board with regards to those warrant
14· · · ·articles.
15· ·Q.· And where are those, as you put it, sentiments of
16· · · ·the select board recorded?
17· ·A.· I'd have to --
18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
19· ·Q.· You can answer.
20· ·A.· I'd have to go back through the minutes leading up
21· · · ·to that point.· And then certainly discussions with
22· · · ·board members individually.
23· ·Q.· So you had individual or you had conversations or
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
78
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·communications with individual board meetings[sic]
·2· · · ·outside of public meetings?
·3· ·A.· Not board.· With individual selectmen, selectmen,
·4· · · ·especially the chair.
·5· ·Q.· Outside of a public meeting?
·6· ·A.· 'Cause he would come into my office, all the board
·7· · · ·members come in to talk to town administrator.
·8· ·Q.· All right.
·9· ·A.· Normally.
10· ·Q.· And those communications and conversations occurred
11· · · ·outside of a public meeting; correct?
12· ·A.· Yup.
13· ·Q.· Is there any record of those discussions that you
14· · · ·had with individual board members outside a public
15· · · ·meeting regarding these two warrant articles, No.
16· · · ·27 and 28, either before they were formally
17· · · ·submitted or afterwards?
18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.
19· ·Q.· You can answer.
20· ·A.· Formally submitted to the DRA after town meeting
21· · · ·or ...
22· ·Q.· Before they were formally submitted to the Town for
23· · · ·submission to the public, the annual meeting?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
79
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· So we don't find out about warrant articles until
·2· · · ·they are submitted to the town clerk; so before
·3· · · ·that I had no knowledge of them at all.
·4· ·Q.· You had some idea that something was going to be
·5· · · ·submitted, though, did you?
·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.
·7· ·Q.· You can answer.
·8· ·A.· No.
·9· ·Q.· Okay.
10· ·A.· Not to the town clerk, no.
11· ·Q.· And then after they had been formally submitted to
12· · · ·the Town, you had conversations with individual
13· · · ·board members out --
14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Hold for a second, please.
15· · · · · · · · ·(Recess taken.)
16· · · · · · · · ·(Roderick O'Shana now present.)
17· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Back on the record.
18· · · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· You'll have to reiterate
19· · · ·what you asked.
20· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Yes.
21· ·BY MR. SOUCY:
22· ·Q.· So after Warrant Articles 27 and 28 had been
23· · · ·submitted to the Town of Haverhill, you had
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
80
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·communications or discussions with individual
·2· · · ·members of the board of selectmen that occurred
·3· · · ·outside of, or not during, public meetings;
·4· · · ·correct?
·5· ·A.· Yup.· Yes.
·6· ·Q.· Is there any written notes or anything that was
·7· · · ·memorialized of those communications?
·8· ·A.· No, they were fairly informal.
·9· ·Q.· What is the process through which the town manager
10· · · ·submits warrant articles to the DRA for the review?
11· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.
12· ·Q.· You can --
13· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· We are kind of going outside
14· · · ·of the Court's April 4th order limiting it to
15· · · ·issues relevant to the motions for summary judgment
16· · · ·and defendant's opposition thereto.
17· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Okay.· Not surprising, I
18· · · ·disagree because this is exactly the reason why
19· · · ·this was in front of the DRA.· Your client has
20· · · ·stated that it wasn't her fault.· And this is tied
21· · · ·to Exhibit No. 16 of the statement of facts that
22· · · ·relates to the DRA having this on their radar and
23· · · ·credibility of your client.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
81
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · ·So we can move forward.
·2· ·BY MR. SOUCY:
·3· ·Q.· With respect to those communications there was
·4· · · ·nothing in writing.· You also said that whenever
·5· · · ·the articles, warrant articles that are formally
·6· · · ·submitted to the town clerk, they are sent to the
·7· · · ·DRA for a review process; correct?
·8· ·A.· So warrant articles are submitted to the town
·9· · · ·clerk.
10· ·Q.· Yup.
11· ·A.· She verifies the petitions and the signatures on
12· · · ·the petitions, that they are registered voters, and
13· · · ·then they come over to the town administration
14· · · ·office.· We compile them and they go to the DRA for
15· · · ·a prereview.
16· ·Q.· Okay.· What does the town manager send specifically
17· · · ·to the DRA for the DRA to conduct its review?
18· ·A.· We enter them into the portal, and what you're
19· · · ·entering is the question.
20· ·Q.· Okay.
21· ·A.· Sometimes they ask for the whole petition; it
22· · · ·depends.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· Initially, though, there is a for, for
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
82
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·someone in any of the towns in New Hampshire,
·2· · · ·whatever form of government the town has, but
·3· · · ·someone is assigned within the town to log in to
·4· · · ·website into a portal that the DRA has; is that
·5· · · ·correct?
·6· ·A.· Yes.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.· So then when that employee logs in to DRA's
·8· · · ·website, is it fair to say that an initial phase or
·9· · · ·stage then is for the employee to look at and read
10· · · ·and enter in word for word or verbatim what the
11· · · ·warrant article states?
12· ·A.· It should be word for word whatever the question
13· · · ·is, yes.· The question that the public will be
14· · · ·asked.
15· ·Q.· What happens after that?
16· ·A.· The DRA often comes back and asks questions.· Might
17· · · ·discuss with us the questions being asked.· Because
18· · · ·these are petitions, they are not always worded
19· · · ·legally or correctly.· Some of them, that's usually
20· · · ·when we find out if they are binding or advisory
21· · · ·based on what the question is; that sort of thing.
22· ·Q.· What did you mean by "binding or advisory"?
23· ·A.· When the people vote whether their vote binds the
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
83
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·Town to do something or whether it's just advisory;
·2· · · ·whether it's just they get to have a say of how
·3· · · ·they feel about it, but it's not going to actually
·4· · · ·bind us to do anything.
·5· ·Q.· With respect to Warrant Article No. 27, what, if
·6· · · ·anything, did the DRA ask for with respect to
·7· · · ·additional information?
·8· ·A.· They didn't necessarily until after town meeting;
·9· · · ·and then they asked for a lot.
10· ·Q.· And so was it your office or was it you that
11· · · ·provided that additional information?
12· ·A.· After town meeting?
13· ·Q.· Yes.
14· ·A.· It was both myself and Jennifer Boucher.
15· ·Q.· What was that information?
16· ·A.· Oh, goodness.· They asked for 100 years of town
17· · · ·reports.· They asked for, I can't remember
18· · · ·everything.· They asked, there was a lot of
19· · · ·historical information, factual information,
20· · · ·anything we had in our records that they thought
21· · · ·would help them with their evaluation.
22· ·Q.· With respect to Warrant Article 28 --
23· ·A.· The same.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
84
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· They asked for the same information or what was,
·2· · · ·what you and Ms. Boucher provided to the department
·3· · · ·applied to both articles?
·4· ·A.· It applied to both articles because when they were,
·5· · · ·when the DRA reached out to us, they weren't being
·6· · · ·specific which article they were asking for that
·7· · · ·information; they just told us what they needed.
·8· · · ·And at the time we weren't even really aware what
·9· · · ·they were looking for or what they were looking at.
10· · · ·They just, they asked for something; we would
11· · · ·provide it.
12· ·Q.· So the request then from DRA did not specify that,
13· · · ·which article they needed the information for; they
14· · · ·just then made a general request for information;
15· · · ·is that correct?
16· ·A.· Yes.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· Other than the information that DRA asked
18· · · ·for after the town meeting and the vote that
19· · · ·approved each of these two articles, what other
20· · · ·communications did you have with DRA with respect
21· · · ·to the warrant articles?
22· ·A.· After town meeting?
23· ·Q.· After town meeting.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
85
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· Other than providing information, I don't recall.
·2· ·Q.· What about before the town meeting?
·3· ·A.· Before town meeting I had sent email, an email or
·4· · · ·emails to James Gerry regarding those articles and
·5· · · ·that it was the Town's understanding that they
·6· · · ·should be disallowed.
·7· ·Q.· And you stated that it's your belief that there are
·8· · · ·minutes of the board of selectmen that document
·9· · · ·that the board of selectmen asked you to send those
10· · · ·communications over to DRA before the town meeting?
11· ·A.· I don't know if there are, is anything explicit
12· · · ·like that in the minutes, but there were certainly
13· · · ·discussions with the board of selectmen and the
14· · · ·individual board members about the disallowance.
15· ·Q.· And were those discussions, when did those
16· · · ·discussions occur, inside or outside of public town
17· · · ·meetings, public meetings of the board?
18· ·A.· Both.· Not amongst the board members, but board
19· · · ·members and myself.
20· ·Q.· And who were the board members that you had
21· · · ·discussions with that you say was an indication of
22· · · ·the board of selectmen requesting or wanting you as
23· · · ·the town manager to make contact with DRA about
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
86
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·these articles that were going to be submitted as
·2· · · ·to whether they were valid or invalid?
·3· ·A.· That would be the chair and the vice chair, so Fred
·4· · · ·Garofalo, Matt Bjelobrk and Howard Hatch.
·5· ·Q.· When was the earliest conversation that you had
·6· · · ·with any of those three?
·7· ·A.· Oh, would have had to have been after the deadline
·8· · · ·for submission of the petition, so sometime in
·9· · · ·mid-February I would think.
10· ·Q.· So between the deadline for the submission of
11· · · ·articles to the Town, but prior to the annual town
12· · · ·meeting?
13· ·A.· Yes.
14· ·Q.· Okay.· And in this situation with respect to
15· · · ·Warrant Articles 27 and 28, that would have been
16· · · ·mid-February of 2022; is that correct?
17· ·A.· Yes.· Yes, I think.· I'd have to go back and check.
18· · · ·I'd have to check.
19· ·Q.· Fairly certain but not absolutely certain?
20· ·A.· I'm pretty sure, yeah.
21· ·Q.· Okay.
22· ·A.· Feels like forever ago.
23· ·Q.· On page 3 of the document that you have in front of
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
87
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·you, just about the halfway point there's an email
·2· · · ·from Steve Robbins, still on January 11, 2023,
·3· · · ·11:36 a.m. to you.· Do you see where that email
·4· · · ·begins?
·5· ·A.· I do.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.· And it start out by, Here are my thoughts.
·7· · · ·Steve then writes, We are in crisis, the select
·8· · · ·board hold ultimate responsibility, therefore needs
·9· · · ·to take the lead to get through.
10· · · · · · · · ·Do you see that line?
11· ·A.· I do.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· So back on January 11th of 2023, how does
13· · · ·that statement from Steve Robbins not indicate to
14· · · ·you that the board of selectmen was, as he said,
15· · · ·taking the lead with respect to the DRA tax setting
16· · · ·issue?
17· ·A.· Well, one, individual board members can't make a
18· · · ·statement and have that be an action of the board.
19· ·Q.· Okay.· So who else made a statement similar to that
20· · · ·in substance, meaning the board with respect to
21· · · ·this DRA issue is now taking the lead.· The town
22· · · ·manager is sort of not in the driver's seat, so to
23· · · ·speak, not in control?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
88
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· It was usually Steve.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.· Who else in addition --
·3· ·A.· I don't recall.· Sorry.
·4· ·Q.· -- with respect to this DRA rate setting issue?
·5· ·A.· I don't recall any of the other board members
·6· · · ·making that statement.
·7· ·Q.· Did you provide him with any reply or any response
·8· · · ·to his statement that it required a full vote or
·9· · · ·anything like that?· What response did you have to
10· · · ·him?
11· ·A.· My response is the email.
12· ·Q.· And that, and that's it?· Just, where in there did
13· · · ·you explain to him that one board member doesn't
14· · · ·bind the entire board of selectmen?
15· ·A.· So in this email I didn't, but at the beginning of
16· · · ·every year after town meeting we go through
17· · · ·standard operating procedures for the board of
18· · · ·selectmen, and it's explicitly pointed out in the
19· · · ·SOPs for the select board that one individual board
20· · · ·member cannot make a decision on their own; it has
21· · · ·to be a formal action of the board in a publicly
22· · · ·warned meeting with a quorum present.
23· ·Q.· And relation to January 11th, when was that review
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
89
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·of the standard operating procedures conducted?
·2· ·A.· The last time we would have done that would be
·3· · · ·right after town meeting in 2021.· And it's on the
·4· · · ·select board's website, web page.
·5· ·Q.· So then we would have gone from after town meeting
·6· · · ·2021, which was late February or March?
·7· ·A.· Would have been March.
·8· ·Q.· March?· Okay.
·9· ·A.· Usually the end of March we have our first meeting
10· · · ·where the newly constituted board meets and has
11· · · ·their on-boarding meeting.
12· ·Q.· End of March of 2021, and this is January 11th of
13· · · ·2023.· So as of, as of yet there hadn't been that
14· · · ·review of the standard operating procedures;
15· · · ·correct?
16· ·A.· Not for, not until the next March would we do it
17· · · ·again.
18· ·Q.· But otherwise there's no response from you that
19· · · ·conveyed to him that his position that the board of
20· · · ·selectmen needs to take the lead with respect to
21· · · ·the DRA rate setting issue to get through it, you
22· · · ·didn't have any response to him about that;
23· · · ·correct?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
90
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· No.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.· So why was it that you didn't want the board
·3· · · ·of selectmen to be on the lead with respect to the
·4· · · ·DRA rate setting issue?
·5· ·A.· Well, there were a few things that I pointed out in
·6· · · ·my email, and specifically he, the problem we were
·7· · · ·running into is that the board did not fully
·8· · · ·understand or respect the process that had to be
·9· · · ·followed to waive the conflict or not.· You'd have
10· · · ·to go through that conflict check and do your due
11· · · ·diligence for the Town of Haverhill.
12· ·Q.· All right.· And if you could unpack that for me,
13· · · ·explain that a little more how that related to,
14· · · ·relates to why you didn't want the board of
15· · · ·selectmen to take the lead on that rate setting
16· · · ·issue?
17· ·A.· It's not that I didn't want them to take the lead;
18· · · ·it's that we were already working on it, and I was
19· · · ·trying to explain to him and the other board
20· · · ·members what Jennifer and I were already doing with
21· · · ·regard to the tax rate setting matter and what
22· · · ·process we needed to follow.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· And who was working with you, as you said,
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
91
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·with respect to the rate setting issue?
·2· ·A.· I was working directly with Jennifer Boucher as the
·3· · · ·assistant town manager, and we were working with
·4· · · ·the DRA and Drummond Woodsum Law Firm.
·5· ·Q.· So as of January 11th what had Drummond Woodsum
·6· · · ·done with respect to the DRA rate setting issue and
·7· · · ·getting it resolved?
·8· ·A.· We were actively involved working with Drummond
·9· · · ·Woodsum Law Firm as well as the DRA on the tax rate
10· · · ·setting matter before that letter came at the end
11· · · ·of December; and we had been working with them on
12· · · ·the tax rate setting matter for weeks because we
13· · · ·already knew there was going to be a delay in the
14· · · ·tax rate because the school had to go through a
15· · · ·procedural defect meeting, which was not going to
16· · · ·happen until the 9th of January.
17· ·Q.· So what had Drummond Woodsum done with respect to
18· · · ·the rate setting issue as of January 11th?
19· ·A.· She had been working with Peter Roth to determine
20· · · ·what was going to happen and when the procedural
21· · · ·defect meeting was going to take place; and she had
22· · · ·set up a meeting between myself, her and Peter Roth
23· · · ·of the DRA to discuss that.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
92
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· When was the meeting?
·2· ·A.· Would have been beginning of December, around
·3· · · ·there.
·4· ·Q.· Do you have any record of that meeting, in a
·5· · · ·calendar or on a calendar anywhere?
·6· ·A.· I would have to look.· I would think so, but I
·7· · · ·would have to look.
·8· ·Q.· So I'd like to make a written request to your
·9· · · ·attorney.· And when he receives it, if you'd work
10· · · ·with him to produce that, that would be great.
11· · · · · · · · ·And who was to attend that meeting or who
12· · · ·did attend that meeting?
13· ·A.· It was just Christine Fillmore Johnston of Drummond
14· · · ·Woodsum, myself and Peter Roth of the DRA.· It was
15· · · ·a phone conference.
16· ·Q.· Telephone conference?
17· ·A.· Yes.
18· ·Q.· And what was accomplished during that telephone
19· · · ·conference?
20· ·A.· Just the confirmation that the procedural defect
21· · · ·meeting would happen on January 9th, and that that
22· · · ·would definitely delay the tax rate being set.
23· ·Q.· And what was the procedural defect meeting that the
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
93
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·school board had to address?
·2· ·A.· They had received a grant, I believe, and they had
·3· · · ·not held their public hearing properly or they
·4· · · ·hadn't notified it correctly or something like
·5· · · ·that, so they needed to do it over.
·6· ·Q.· And that related to the tax rate setting issuing
·7· · · ·how?
·8· ·A.· Because the town's tax rate is comprised of the
·9· · · ·districts, all the districts, Grafton County and
10· · · ·the state and school tax; and we can't set the
11· · · ·town's tax rate until all those entities have filed
12· · · ·their information and support.
13· ·Q.· Down at the bottom of that third page, the last
14· · · ·three lines, there was an issue, according to this.
15· · · ·What's written here is that the Drummond Woodsum
16· · · ·was having some kind of delay or problem and they
17· · · ·as the board as it's stated here, was deciding to
18· · · ·assign all of the cases of the case with a new firm
19· · · ·immediately.· Do you see that?
20· ·A.· I do.
21· ·Q.· What is your recollection of what that was about
22· · · ·and what became of it?
23· ·A.· That was in relation to the delay on, that was
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
94
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·representative of previous minutes we just
·2· · · ·discussed, and that Steve not understanding the
·3· · · ·process and not understanding the variety of
·4· · · ·lawyers we use or what we use them for, that he
·5· · · ·thought it was going to be simple to just produce a
·6· · · ·list and terminate a law firm.
·7· · · · · · · · ·And after we discussed that at length
·8· · · ·further, they understood we use various law firms
·9· · · ·for a variety of different things, not just one
10· · · ·thing.
11· ·Q.· And when was that discussion had?
12· ·A.· I believe we, I think it is reflected in a set of
13· · · ·minutes after this (indicating).
14· ·Q.· So it would have been a public meeting after
15· · · ·January, or maybe even --
16· ·A.· It would have.
17· ·Q.· -- a nonpublic session anyways of a meeting after
18· · · ·January 11th?
19· ·A.· Yes.· Yes.· I remember we had a very explicit
20· · · ·discussion about law firms, what we use law firms
21· · · ·for and why you don't just terminate a law firm.
22· · · ·And discussing why you wouldn't need to necessarily
23· · · ·terminate Drummond Woodsum simply because they need
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
95
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·a little more time to process a conflict waiver.
·2· ·Q.· And they had initially stated that they weren't
·3· · · ·able to continue to represent the Town with respect
·4· · · ·to the tax rate setting issue; correct?
·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·6· ·Q.· You can answer.
·7· ·A.· Until they cleared the conflict.
·8· ·Q.· Okay.
·9· ·A.· It took a few days.
10· ·Q.· What were the board's feelings as far as what
11· · · ·Drummond Woodsum said that it was going to do and
12· · · ·get accomplished and Drummond Woodsum not coming
13· · · ·through on that or delivering that?
14· ·A.· That's reflected in the January 9th meeting
15· · · ·minutes.
16· ·Q.· The number on the sticker?
17· ·A.· It's Exhibit 2.
18· ·Q.· On Exhibit 2?
19· ·A.· Yeah, this is where they first expressed that they
20· · · ·were concerned about Drummond Woodsum because
21· · · ·Drummond Woodsum had not produced the letter.
22· ·Q.· Okay.· And what did the board members say about
23· · · ·getting a different law firm other than Drummond
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
96
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·Woodsum because it was a time-sensitive issue?
·2· ·A.· So they asked Jennifer Boucher and I at this
·3· · · ·January 9th meeting to reach out to DTC attorneys
·4· · · ·specifically, to which we thought was strange that
·5· · · ·they cited an attorney, to see if DTC could clear
·6· · · ·their conflicts if Drummond couldn't.
·7· ·Q.· And what is your understanding and your assessment
·8· · · ·with respect to the board of selectmen having the
·9· · · ·recollection that the decision was to actually go
10· · · ·with DTC, not just for town administration to,
11· · · ·quote/unquote, to reach out to DTC?
12· ·A.· What do I think about that?
13· ·Q.· Yeah.· What's your recollection of it?· What's your
14· · · ·understanding of it?
15· ·A.· My recollection is exactly as it's reflected in the
16· · · ·minutes.
17· ·Q.· Okay.
18· ·A.· Because I know what they asked me to do.· And the
19· · · ·fact that I sent an email to Chris Boldt at DTC
20· · · ·that very night exhibits that I did exactly what
21· · · ·they asked me to do, which was to reach out to DTC.
22· ·Q.· So you then disagree with the position that the
23· · · ·members of the board of selectmen have, that their
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
97
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·intent was to actually hire at that moment in time
·2· · · ·DTC Lawyers?
·3· ·A.· I don't want to speculate what their, what at that
·4· · · ·point their intent was because I know what the
·5· · · ·motion was, which was very different than what they
·6· · · ·after the fact stated their intent was.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.· But your understanding back when the motion
·8· · · ·was made, your understanding was to only
·9· · · ·communicate with.· You don't, you didn't understand
10· · · ·it that the board members wanted you to move
11· · · ·forward and actually retain DTC Lawyers; correct?
12· ·A.· Absolutely.· There was no indication that at that
13· · · ·point in time they wanted us to actually hire a
14· · · ·different law firm.
15· ·Q.· What matters in addition to or other than the DRA
16· · · ·tax rate setting issue did the board either want to
17· · · ·hire DTC Lawyers or hire DTC Lawyers to address?
18· ·A.· They didn't want to hire DTC for anything at that
19· · · ·point.· We were already using DTC attorneys for
20· · · ·utility matters, which is what we had historically
21· · · ·used them for.
22· ·Q.· In an email that you had with Attorney Christopher
23· · · ·Boldt you had indicated that you had confidence
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
98
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·that they could do a good job on the DRA tax
·2· · · ·rating, tax setting issue because of working with
·3· · · ·them in the past; is that what you're referring to?
·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·5· ·Q.· You can answer.
·6· ·A.· At that time I had no idea Chris Hawkins worked for
·7· · · ·DTC attorneys, and I have good relations with Chris
·8· · · ·Boldt.· He had served us well for utility matters.
·9· ·Q.· Were you involved in or did you attend the
10· · · ·nonpublic sessions of the board of selectmen in
11· · · ·early January?
12· ·A.· No.
13· ·Q.· Do you know why?
14· ·A.· No, they were excluding us from almost everything
15· · · ·at that point.
16· ·Q.· And who was "us" when you refer to us?
17· ·A.· Jennifer Boucher and I.· Town administration.
18· ·Q.· When did you come to understand or realize what the
19· · · ·explanation was for not including you, or as you
20· · · ·put it, excluding you, from those nonpublic
21· · · ·sessions in early January?
22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
23· ·Q.· You can answer.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
99
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· It would have been after the board of 2023 was
·2· · · ·constituted and they made the decision to request
·3· · · ·all information from the DTC law firm that they had
·4· · · ·in their possession related to anything that had to
·5· · · ·do with Haverhill.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.· And did you have an opportunity to go
·7· · · ·through that information?
·8· ·A.· All of it.
·9· ·Q.· Okay.· And what did that information say with
10· · · ·respect to why the board of selectmen back in
11· · · ·January of 2022, as you put it was excluding both
12· · · ·you and Ms. Boucher from those nonpublic meetings?
13· ·A.· Because ultimately their goal was to just fire me.
14· ·Q.· Based upon your review of those documents that were
15· · · ·received, why was the board seeking or looking to
16· · · ·fire you as far as, again, what you gathered from
17· · · ·your review of those documents?
18· ·A.· My opinion again or ...
19· ·Q.· What you got from those documents?· What did those
20· · · ·documents say?
21· ·A.· I didn't get a lot from those documents other than
22· · · ·the fact that certain board members just came into
23· · · ·office wanting, with the goal of wanting to fire
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
100
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·the town manager.
·2· ·Q.· So there wasn't any reason for it?
·3· ·A.· Their reason, there wasn't any good reasons.· There
·4· · · ·were some, there was some information tied to
·5· · · ·Article 27 and 28 and their displeasure with the
·6· · · ·fact that the board of 2021 and previous boards to
·7· · · ·that were oppositional to the Woodsville Fire
·8· · · ·District and the funding of Woodsville Highway and
·9· · · ·Fire.
10· ·Q.· Was it, who in the board or who was on the board
11· · · ·that you're understanding were looking to fire you
12· · · ·at that point?
13· ·A.· From those documents?
14· ·Q.· Yes.
15· ·A.· Kevin Knapp definitely, but also Steve Robbins and
16· · · ·Katie.
17· ·Q.· Okay.
18· ·A.· Little bit of Mike, but he was pretty good at not
19· · · ·responding to things clearly.
20· ·Q.· And which of those three people, because you named
21· · · ·three with certainty, Steve Robbin, Kevin Knapp,
22· · · ·Katie Williams, which of those three board members
23· · · ·have a connection to or with Woodsville Village
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
101
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·District?
·2· ·A.· All of them.
·3· ·Q.· Okay.· How does Steve Robbins have a connection?
·4· ·A.· He lives in Woodsville Fire District, has a
·5· · · ·business in the Woodsville Fire District, and he
·6· · · ·works for the Woodsville Fire District as does most
·7· · · ·of his family.
·8· ·Q.· Okay.· What information or evidence is there that
·9· · · ·his connection in and to Woodsville actually had a
10· · · ·bearing on his actions and communications as a
11· · · ·member of the board of selectmen in 2022?
12· ·A.· That I witnessed?
13· ·Q.· That you know of.
14· ·A.· Well, for example, going to the Woodsville Fire
15· · · ·District to sign documents instead of the town
16· · · ·hall.
17· ·Q.· Okay.
18· ·A.· When he would refer to situations, he would say
19· · · ·"we," and when he said we, he meant the Woodsville
20· · · ·Fire District.· He would go to Woodsville Fire
21· · · ·District meetings and in the minutes is represented
22· · · ·as speaking on behalf of Woodsville Fire District
23· · · ·against the Town; for example, at an annual meeting
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
102
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·he's quoted as saying he would never work for the
·2· · · ·Town of Haverhill, and the Town of Haverhill would
·3· · · ·never be an entity that he would be associated
·4· · · ·with.
·5· · · · · · · · ·There were lots of examples of him being
·6· · · ·biased.· That's while he was on the board.
·7· ·Q.· So as far as signing, you said signing documents in
·8· · · ·or at the Woodsville Village District office, how
·9· · · ·does that have a bearing on his impartiality?
10· ·A.· Because he signed an engagement letter for the Town
11· · · ·of Haverhill as a representative of the Haverhill
12· · · ·Select Board on a Sunday in the Woodsville Fire
13· · · ·District office at the same time as district
14· · · ·commissioners.· It had never, it doesn't happen
15· · · ·like that.
16· ·Q.· How is that an indication of a lack of
17· · · ·impartiality?· Is there some proscription against
18· · · ·signing documents on Sundays?
19· ·A.· In an official capacity of a town official in a
20· · · ·district office in a matter that is between
21· · · ·Woodsville and Haverhill?· I don't know.· It seemed
22· · · ·from everybody's perspective that I have ever heard
23· · · ·from, that seemed odd.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
103
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· What was the document that he signed?
·2· ·A.· The engagement letter.
·3· ·Q.· What's in the, who drafted it?· Who generated the
·4· · · ·document that he signed?
·5· ·A.· It's my understanding from the documents we
·6· · · ·received from DTC that Christopher Hawkins produced
·7· · · ·that document.
·8· ·Q.· Okay.· Is there, what is there for a requirement
·9· · · ·that documents relating to the Town of Haverhill
10· · · ·have to be signed in Town of Haverhill's office?
11· ·A.· There's no proscription.· It's just historical.
12· · · ·It's just the way that it's done.· Usually the
13· · · ·documents come to the town office, they are signed
14· · · ·in the town office and they leave from the town
15· · · ·office.
16· ·Q.· Okay.
17· ·A.· So that they stay in our custody and control.
18· ·Q.· Okay.· What about that document is evidence of or
19· · · ·indication of his lack of impartiality with respect
20· · · ·to the Town of Haverhill?
21· ·A.· Well, directly that there is no evidence that there
22· · · ·was ever a public meeting or a quorum of the board.
23· · · ·And there's no minute on record that ever gave him
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
104
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·authority to even sign the document.
·2· ·Q.· What was the scope of legal representation for that
·3· · · ·document to hire DTC Lawyers?
·4· ·A.· What was the scope of the agreement?
·5· ·Q.· Yeah, what subject matters, what things did the
·6· · · ·board hire DTC to do?
·7· ·A.· The, what was in the final engagement letter?
·8· ·Q.· The one that he signed.
·9· ·A.· Was that, I'd have to go back and look at the
10· · · ·document, but I believe it was in general the tax
11· · · ·rate setting matter and personnel matters.
12· ·Q.· And the personnel matters related to who?
13· ·A.· It didn't specify.
14· ·Q.· Okay.
15· ·A.· And that was added to that in the iterations of
16· · · ·that engagement letter that were produced.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· Is there, what, if any, indication that the
18· · · ·document was revised has anything to do with, I
19· · · ·guess, an allegation that he was not impartial with
20· · · ·respect to the Town of Haverhill?
21· ·A.· The statement that it was revised is just that you
22· · · ·had asked about personnel matters, and that
23· · · ·particular subject was added to a later iteration
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
105
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·of the letter.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.· Why is it unusual or abnormal that a
·3· · · ·document would go through revisions?
·4· ·A.· Documents do go through revisions, but usually when
·5· · · ·you're producing a document like that, you know
·6· · · ·what your scope is; you know why you're being, why
·7· · · ·you're looking for an attorney.
·8· ·Q.· But it's not uncommon for documents to be revised
·9· · · ·and things to be added or subtracted; correct?
10· ·A.· Yeah, that's true.
11· ·Q.· Okay.· With respect to Woodsville Fire
12· · · ·District/Village District and the meetings that you
13· · · ·talked about, he I guess was recorded or quoted as
14· · · ·saying he would never work for the Town of
15· · · ·Haverhill.· What does that have to do with or what
16· · · ·bearing does that have to do, as far as you see it,
17· · · ·with his role as a member of the board of selectmen
18· · · ·for Haverhill?
19· ·A.· If, the minutes I'm talking about are the annual
20· · · ·meeting minutes for the District of Woodsville and
21· · · ·his attendance there and the statements made were
22· · · ·derogatory with regard to the Town of Haverhill,
23· · · ·which he was serving on as a, on the board of
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
106
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·selectmen at the time.· That shows bias.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.· How does that show bias as far as he would
·3· · · ·never work for the Town of Haverhill?· What did he
·4· · · ·mean by that?
·5· ·A.· I don't want to infer on what he meant by that.· It
·6· · · ·was just derogatory and negative.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.· Why is it derogatory or negative for someone
·8· · · ·to say I wouldn't work for that particular employer
·9· · · ·or that particular employer or that company?
10· ·A.· There was more to the statement, so I would have to
11· · · ·go back and pull the minutes.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you recall what there was for more to the
13· · · ·statements?
14· ·A.· I don't remember his exact words, but it was very
15· · · ·derogatory to the town that he was representing on
16· · · ·the board.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· But you don't recall how or why it was
18· · · ·interrogatory?
19· ·A.· I have to read the statements.· It's in the
20· · · ·minutes.· And there's more than that.· He's also
21· · · ·made statements in the newspaper that were
22· · · ·derogatory toward the town that he was serving.
23· ·Q.· And what were those comments that he made?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
107
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· I'd have to go back to the newspapers and pull
·2· · · ·them.
·3· ·Q.· So you don't remember?
·4· ·A.· I don't remember the exact statements.
·5· ·Q.· So how do you remember that the statements that he
·6· · · ·made were derogatory, then?
·7· ·A.· Because they were offensive.
·8· ·Q.· In what way?
·9· ·A.· In general.· Not just to me, but, and it wasn't
10· · · ·about me; it was about the Town of Haverhill.
11· ·Q.· But you don't recall what he said or what it was
12· · · ·relating to?
13· ·A.· I would have to go back and find the minutes and
14· · · ·find the news article.
15· ·Q.· Okay.· So as you understood it, back in beginning
16· · · ·of January 2023 with respect to Chris Hawkins, how
17· · · ·did DTC, the law firm, have a conflict of interest
18· · · ·because of Chris Hawkins being employed there?
19· ·A.· Why would I see that as a conflict, is that the
20· · · ·question?
21· ·Q.· I'm asking how did DTC as a law firm have a
22· · · ·conflict of interest with Chris Hawkins being
23· · · ·employed or a partner there, being an attorney in
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
108
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·DTC Lawyers January of 2023?
·2· ·A.· So as far as DTC attorneys, the fact that Chris
·3· · · ·Hawkins was on staff was not necessarily, didn't
·4· · · ·create a conflict that was insuperable.· And we
·5· · · ·made it clear that it was Chris Hawkins that could
·6· · · ·not clear conflicts and that Chris Hawkins should
·7· · · ·not be involved if the Town was to hire DTC
·8· · · ·attorneys.
·9· ·Q.· So back in January of 2023 with the board of
10· · · ·selectmen acting that they had retained or hired
11· · · ·DTC to represent the Town in connection with the
12· · · ·DRA tax rate setting matter, what about DTC
13· · · ·addressing or working on that tax rate setting
14· · · ·matter would involve or implicate the Woodsville
15· · · ·litigation?
16· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
17· ·Q.· You can answer.
18· ·A.· So the tax rate setting matter was directly
19· · · ·connected to Articles 27 and 28; and like I said
20· · · ·earlier, the Articles 27 and 28 was directly tied
21· · · ·to the funding by the Town of the Woodsville Fire
22· · · ·District's operations, which was tied to the
23· · · ·litigation and the changes to legislation.· It was
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
109
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·all connected.
·2· · · · · · · · ·And because of that, Chris Hawkins had
·3· · · ·litigated against the Town.· At the time this
·4· · · ·started we were still at the tail end of settlement
·5· · · ·for the litigation itself.· Article 27 and 28 had
·6· · · ·already surfaced as an issue, and so it was all
·7· · · ·tied, all tied together.
·8· ·Q.· Articles 27, Warrant Articles 27 and 28 did not
·9· · · ·relate to the same dollars or the same dollar
10· · · ·amounts as what was involved in Woodsville's
11· · · ·lawsuit against Town of Haverhill, right?
12· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
13· ·Q.· You can answer.
14· ·A.· It was over the same issue, which was the Town of
15· · · ·Haverhill funding Woodsville's operations for fire
16· · · ·and highway using Haverhill tax dollars.· It was
17· · · ·the same legal issue.
18· ·Q.· Okay.· But it wasn't the same dollar amount; it
19· · · ·wasn't the same, sort of, pot of money, if you
20· · · ·will, that Woodsville had brought the lawsuit
21· · · ·against the Town of Haverhill for, though?
22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
23· ·Q.· You can answer.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
110
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· It wasn't the same, it wasn't the same litigation;
·2· · · ·it wasn't the same lawsuit.
·3· ·Q.· Right.· And then there was, you know, legislation,
·4· · · ·as you put it, there was a bill, there was an act,
·5· · · ·and it was signed into law?
·6· ·A.· Uh-huh.· Yes.
·7· ·Q.· And then, I almost said well after that, but after
·8· · · ·that Warrant Articles 27 and 28 were submitted by
·9· · · ·Woodsville to the town clerk to get put on the
10· · · ·ballot for the town, annual town meeting; correct?
11· ·A.· Yes.
12· ·Q.· All right.· And those two articles, Article 27 and
13· · · ·28, had different amounts in them than what was
14· · · ·involved in the lawsuit; correct?
15· ·A.· Yes.
16· ·Q.· Okay.· And Articles 27 and 28 were the result of or
17· · · ·came out of what was put into, what was signed into
18· · · ·law; correct?
19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
20· ·Q.· You can answer.
21· ·A.· What they believed was included in law, yes.
22· ·Q.· They believe, what they submitted as Warrant
23· · · ·Articles 27 and 28 the proponents of, or who
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
111
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·submitted it, believed that the basis for those two
·2· · · ·warrant articles was provided for right in the act?
·3· ·A.· Woodsville Fire District believed that, yes.
·4· ·Q.· Okay.· So what, as your understanding is, what
·5· · · ·would Chris Hawkins in January of 2023 have done in
·6· · · ·connection with the DRA rate setting issue that
·7· · · ·would have involved the legislation, sorry, the
·8· · · ·lawsuit that Woodsville brought against Haverhill
·9· · · ·that already had been settled?
10· ·A.· So the negotiations and the settlement agreement
11· · · ·had been agreed to, but the final payment had not
12· · · ·been made yet on, if we are just talking about with
13· · · ·the lawsuit, and if we had failed to make that
14· · · ·second payment, we would have ended up back in
15· · · ·court over the same matter.· So technically that
16· · · ·situation was not concluded yet.
17· ·Q.· That second of two payments; correct?
18· ·A.· That would have finalized that litigation, yes.
19· ·Q.· But the lawsuit itself had been resolved, had been
20· · · ·settled; correct?
21· ·A.· There had been a settlement negotiated.
22· ·Q.· Okay.· And there had been --
23· ·A.· And a settlement agreement had been agreed to, yes.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
112
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Okay.· And the, what's referred to as docket
·2· · · ·markings are an agreement for the docket to be
·3· · · ·marked as settled and closed, that document had
·4· · · ·been filed with the court?
·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form?
·6· ·A.· I don't remember the date that was filed.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.· If it was or if that document had been filed
·8· · · ·with the court on or before, you know, January 12th
·9· · · ·of 2023, that lawsuit would be closed and done;
10· · · ·correct?
11· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
12· ·Q.· You can answer.
13· ·A.· Okay.· That particular lawsuit, yes.
14· ·Q.· All right.· So is there, based upon your
15· · · ·understanding of things and your position, is there
16· · · ·anything that, any issue, any matter, is there
17· · · ·anything that Chris Hawkins while working at DTC
18· · · ·could represent the Town of Haverhill on or in?
19· ·A.· Anything not related to the Woodsville Fire
20· · · ·District and the fire district funding by the Town
21· · · ·of Haverhill.
22· ·Q.· Okay.· If Chris Hawkins performed any legal work or
23· · · ·legal services on behalf of the Town of Haverhill
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
113
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·in connection with the DRA rate setting issue or
·2· · · ·problem, how would he have been interacting or
·3· · · ·going up against, as the phrase is used, Woodsville
·4· · · ·Village District?
·5· ·A.· Say that again.
·6· ·Q.· Yeah.· In connection with the DRA tax rate setting
·7· · · ·issue, Chris Hawkins wouldn't have had to go up
·8· · · ·against or interact with Woodsville Village
·9· · · ·District; it was Peter Roth or people at the DRA;
10· · · ·correct?
11· ·A.· Directly, yes.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· Is there any indication that he would have
13· · · ·had to have, go up against or interact with
14· · · ·Woodsville Village District in connection with the
15· · · ·DRA tax rate setting issue?
16· ·A.· It was possible.
17· ·Q.· How?
18· ·A.· Because the board of selectmen who are able to file
19· · · ·appeals related to the tax rate, and one of the
20· · · ·things that the Woodsville Fire District was
21· · · ·attempting to do was appeal the town's tax rate
22· · · ·because of the tax rate setting matter being
23· · · ·identified and pointing right at Article 27 and 28
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
114
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·related to the Woodsville Fire District.
·2· ·Q.· So who in that, in what you just explained, who,
·3· · · ·then, would have been filing or who would have
·4· · · ·filed that appeal?
·5· ·A.· It would have been my office on behalf of the board
·6· · · ·of selectmen.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.· And if that happened, then there would have
·8· · · ·been a conflict of interest?
·9· ·A.· No, I think that there was a conflict of interest
10· · · ·because of Chris Hawkins' previous and previous
11· · · ·connections to the Woodsville lawsuit; and then of
12· · · ·course the Articles 27 and 28 and everything else
13· · · ·that came from that.
14· ·Q.· Okay.· And you see those as --
15· ·A.· Interconnected.
16· ·Q.· -- directly connected one to the other, sort of
17· · · ·going back in a timeline; is that correct?
18· ·A.· They all overlapped.· They each overlapped and they
19· · · ·were all interconnected because they all related to
20· · · ·the same funding matter.
21· ·Q.· Okay.
22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Are we switching gears here?
23· · · ·Are we at a good time to take a break?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
115
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· We can if you need to, want
·2· · · ·to.
·3· · · · · · · · ·(Recess taken.)
·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Back on the record.
·5· ·BY MR. SOUCY:
·6· ·Q.· Ms. Codling, we broke for lunch.· We are back on
·7· · · ·the record.· You're still under oath and we will
·8· · · ·pick up with your deposition.
·9· · · · · · · · ·In connection with question that I asked
10· · · ·you before about whether the lawsuit between
11· · · ·Woodsville and the Town of Haverhill, you at that
12· · · ·point in time said that you couldn't recall.· In
13· · · ·your affidavit to the motion for summary judgment,
14· · · ·paragraph 14, you wrote and attested to, In May
15· · · ·2022, the Woodsville litigation was conditionally
16· · · ·settled requiring Haverhill to make future payments
17· · · ·to Woodsville.· May of 2022 that sound accurate?
18· ·A.· Yes.
19· ·Q.· Okay.· With respect to your role as town manager
20· · · ·and your understanding of the board of selectmen
21· · · ·delegating over to you the role and responsibility
22· · · ·for handling or making decisions with respect to
23· · · ·legal matters relating to Woodsville, your
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
116
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·understanding is that you had the ability to sign
·2· · · ·contracts and waive any conflicts of interest, or
·3· · · ·those sorts of things.· That assignment wouldn't
·4· · · ·also have included you having a responsibility for
·5· · · ·signing a contract to retain either an attorney or
·6· · · ·a law firm in connection with any review of your
·7· · · ·performance or an employment issue or terminating
·8· · · ·your employment with the Town.
·9· · · · · · · · ·That is delegation from the board of
10· · · ·selectmen regarding legal matters related to
11· · · ·Woodsville wouldn't also have included that role as
12· · · ·far as hiring a law firm to review your employment
13· · · ·and give advice as to terminating you or not; would
14· · · ·it have?
15· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
16· ·Q.· Go ahead.
17· ·A.· So normally that would have been delegated, most of
18· · · ·that would have been delegated to Jennifer Boucher.
19· ·Q.· Okay.· And that's what I was going to ask.· So if
20· · · ·not you, especially when something is looking right
21· · · ·back at that employee, it goes, generally the
22· · · ·flowchart, if you will, it would go somewhere; so
23· · · ·where would that have been gone?· It would have
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
117
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·fell to the assistant town manager when the town
·2· · · ·had that form of government?
·3· ·A.· Yes, normally.· So it was, yeah.· It would go to
·4· · · ·Jennifer Boucher --
·5· ·Q.· Okay.
·6· ·A.· As the assistant town manager for just me.
·7· ·Q.· Right.· And I'm presuming back when the town had
·8· · · ·that form the government, if the board of selectmen
·9· · · ·were focused on terminating, getting legal advice
10· · · ·and terminating the assistant town manager, signing
11· · · ·of the contract still would have been with you?
12· ·A.· No, it would have remained with Jennifer Boucher.
13· ·Q.· Even if the board of selectmen wanted legal advice
14· · · ·regarding whether to terminate the assistant town
15· · · ·manager?
16· ·A.· If it was the assistant town manager, it would have
17· · · ·been on me.
18· ·Q.· Okay.
19· ·A.· And so in this regard, Jennifer Boucher would work
20· · · ·with the Mitchell Municipal Group and our HR
21· · · ·attorney, Naomi Butterfield, who we already had on
22· · · ·retainer.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· So when the town had the town manager form
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
118
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·of government, who, if anybody, could the board of
·2· · · ·selectmen have had the power to retain to provide
·3· · · ·legal advice about your employment and whether or
·4· · · ·not to terminate you?
·5· ·A.· Can you state that again?
·6· ·Q.· With respect to the board of selectmen back when
·7· · · ·the town had town manager form of government, who
·8· · · ·or did the board of selectmen have any power to go
·9· · · ·out on its own and retain legal counsel to provide
10· · · ·legal advice as to whether or not to take any
11· · · ·action with respect to the town manager, whether it
12· · · ·was you or not in that role?
13· ·A.· I would say they could have in a publicly warned
14· · · ·meeting voted to retain an attorney for the purpose
15· · · ·for of performance matters if we weren't already
16· · · ·engaged with an HR attorney at another law firm.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· Is there any other type or what other type
18· · · ·of meeting could the board of selectmen in that
19· · · ·scenario with a town manager form of government,
20· · · ·what other type of meeting, if any, could the board
21· · · ·of selectmen have voted to hire a lawyer to provide
22· · · ·it with legal counsel regarding whether or not to
23· · · ·terminate or fire the town manager?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
119
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· To make a motion and take a formal action it would
·2· · · ·have had to have been a publicly warned meeting.
·3· ·Q.· So that isn't something that the board of selectmen
·4· · · ·could have done in a nonpublic session?
·5· ·A.· That's a publicly warned meeting, yup.
·6· ·Q.· But in a public session of a public meeting,
·7· · · ·though?
·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection to form.
·9· ·Q.· Sorry, nonpublic.
10· ·A.· No.· I'm not sure exactly.
11· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· The question is a double
12· · · ·negative.
13· ·Q.· Yeah, so it would have, the board of selectmen
14· · · ·would have had to do it during a public meeting,
15· · · ·but because of 91-A or something else, they would
16· · · ·have done it during a nonpublic session?
17· ·A.· Typically they would discuss in a nonpublic
18· · · ·session, come out into a public session and make a
19· · · ·motion to do something like that so it was on the
20· · · ·record.
21· ·Q.· Okay.· And is that the only way in which the board
22· · · ·of selectmen with that form of government could
23· · · ·have done it?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
120
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· That's my understanding, yes.
·2· ·Q.· And with respect to the DRA tax rate setting issue,
·3· · · ·how much of the Town of Haverhill did it affect?
·4· ·A.· All of Haverhill.
·5· ·Q.· And that would have or did include the separate
·6· · · ·special-purpose districts?
·7· ·A.· They are all within the Town of Haverhill, yep.
·8· ·Q.· When did the Town, if ever, pay Drummond Woodsum
·9· · · ·invoices for the legal services that it provided in
10· · · ·connection with the DRA tax setting issue?
11· ·A.· When did we pay them?
12· ·Q.· Yeah.· Well, the town, yes?
13· ·A.· I would have to see the invoices and look at the
14· · · ·pay requisition.
15· ·Q.· Do you know if the Town has paid all of them?
16· ·A.· For Drummond Woodsum?
17· ·Q.· Yes.
18· ·A.· Yes.
19· ·Q.· I will give you a document that was labeled as
20· · · ·Exhibit 31 to the Town's Motions for Summary
21· · · ·Judgment.· Just take a look at that and let me know
22· · · ·when you're done.· Let me know and we will mark it
23· · · ·with an exhibit sticker.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
121
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 4, 1/13/23 Email, marked for
·2· · · ·identification.)
·3· ·Q.· So you just had a chance to look at the two-page
·4· · · ·document that's been marked as Exhibit 4 to your
·5· · · ·deposition; correct?
·6· ·A.· Yes.
·7· ·Q.· And this is an email at the top from Christopher
·8· · · ·Hawkins to Lynnette Macomber is dated January 13,
·9· · · ·2023?
10· ·A.· Yes.
11· ·Q.· Okay.· Further down there is an email string or
12· · · ·chain.· Further down there is a different email
13· · · ·below that, which is from Peter Roth at New
14· · · ·Hampshire DRA, and it was also January 13, 2023,
15· · · ·but at 5:34 p.m., and it's addressed to Eric Maher
16· · · ·and CC'd to Chris Hawkins; do you see that?
17· ·A.· I do.
18· ·Q.· Okay.· And it appears to be it was also sent to and
19· · · ·addressed to a Laura Lombardi at New Hampshire
20· · · ·Department of Justice, or the AG's office, and then
21· · · ·to another attorney, a third attorney, Chris
22· · · ·Hawkins, and then the fourth attorney Briana
23· · · ·Matuszko.· Do you see that?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
122
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· I do.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.· And down at the body of that message it
·3· · · ·indicates that on Tuesday, January 17, 2023, the
·4· · · ·department, or DRA as we've been referring to them,
·5· · · ·intends to set the tax rate.· That's the tax
·6· · · ·setting rate that we have been talking about?
·7· ·A.· Uh-huh.· Yes.
·8· ·Q.· And do you have any idea why Peter Roth at DRA only
·9· · · ·sent this to lawyers at DTC and not any at Drummond
10· · · ·Woodsum?
11· ·A.· The knowledge that I have related to that was just
12· · · ·that Chris Hawkins had been insistent that the DRA
13· · · ·communicate with them about the town's tax rate.
14· ·Q.· Okay.· Peter Roth was also, had received
15· · · ·communications from the attorneys at Drummond
16· · · ·Woodsum as well, I understand, right?
17· ·A.· Peter Roth was working pretty closely with Drummond
18· · · ·Woodsum on our behalf.
19· ·Q.· Okay.· But you don't know why Peter didn't also CC
20· · · ·them when they are letting them know that the DRA
21· · · ·is going to be setting the tax rate?
22· ·A.· I don't know why with this particular email, no.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· When, if ever, did any representation, legal
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
123
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·representation that Drummond Woodsum carried out or
·2· · · ·performed for the Town of Haverhill in connection
·3· · · ·with the tax setting issue, when, if ever, did
·4· · · ·Drummond Woodsum have to take the position or
·5· · · ·advance the position that the Woodsville either
·6· · · ·Fire District, Woodsville Village District didn't
·7· · · ·legally exist?· Did that ever happen?
·8· ·A.· From my experience none of us ever said that.
·9· ·Q.· Did Drummond Woodsum ever have to advance that or
10· · · ·make that argument?
11· ·A.· No.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· Did the Town of Haverhill ever ask Drummond
13· · · ·Woodsum to advance that argument or make that
14· · · ·argument?
15· ·A.· No.
16· ·Q.· Okay.· And certainly not in connectin with, just to
17· · · ·be clear, not in connection with the work that it
18· · · ·performed in connection with the DRA tax rate
19· · · ·setting?
20· ·A.· Nope.
21· ·Q.· Okay.· On January 13th of 2023, Ms. Boucher sent an
22· · · ·email to Attorney Maher at DTC in which she
23· · · ·explained that both you and she were in the town
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
124
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·offices and Mr. Garofalo came in.· There was a
·2· · · ·discussion about hiring or retaining DTC in
·3· · · ·connection with the tax rate setting issue.
·4· · · · · · · · ·And according to this email, Mr. Garofalo
·5· · · ·stated that the board had not hired or retained DTC
·6· · · ·in connection with that issue.· Do you, first of
·7· · · ·all, did that conversation occur as you recall?
·8· ·A.· Yes.
·9· ·Q.· So you were present for it?
10· ·A.· I was.
11· ·Q.· Okay.· How did that whole conversation come about?
12· · · ·Just take us back to that moment.
13· ·A.· Yup.· So at that time Fred was coming in the office
14· · · ·quite frequently, just checking in, and he had
15· · · ·always done that since the day I was hired.
16· · · · · · · · ·And so in regards to that, he came in to
17· · · ·just kind of vent to us his frustration of what was
18· · · ·going on, and we brought up to him the question
19· · · ·because of the Cinde Warmington phone call we had
20· · · ·received where she had stated that Chris Hawkins
21· · · ·was our attorney, which was the first we had heard
22· · · ·that.
23· · · · · · · · ·And so we pointedly ask the chair of the
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
125
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·select board, which he was at the time, Did you or
·2· · · ·did you not take action to retain DTC, and he said
·3· · · ·absolutely not.· Continuing working with Drummond
·4· · · ·Woodsum.
·5· ·Q.· Okay.· Was that the end of the conversation and
·6· · · ·what he said?
·7· ·A.· That was the gist, the most substantive statements
·8· · · ·that he made, but he was frustrated with the board
·9· · · ·at that point.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you recall when you found out or you
11· · · ·discovered that the board of selectmen was looking
12· · · ·at or considering terminating you in the position
13· · · ·as town manager?
14· ·A.· I didn't find out about that until we acquired all
15· · · ·the documents from Drummond Woodsum in 2023.
16· ·Q.· What do you mean when you acquired the documents,
17· · · ·from where?
18· ·A.· The board of selectmen made the, took action to get
19· · · ·all of the documents Drummond Woodsum had in their
20· · · ·possession is where that became explicitly clear to
21· · · ·me that that's what the board had been trying to
22· · · ·do.
23· ·Q.· A request to Drummond Woodsum?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
126
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· No, sorry, DTC.
·2· ·Q.· Just wanted to make sure --
·3· ·A.· Another D word.· That's why there was that look on
·4· · · ·your face.
·5· ·Q.· Yeah.
·6· ·A.· DTC.· The board of 2023 made the request for
·7· · · ·documents.· That's when I became acutely aware and
·8· · · ·had evidence that that's what they were trying to
·9· · · ·do.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· So after the board of selectmen made a
11· · · ·request to DTC for a complete copy of the file of
12· · · ·whatever kind of request it was, and DTC produced a
13· · · ·copy of those documents, do you know if they went
14· · · ·initially went back to the board of selectmen or to
15· · · ·your office?· Where did they come in from or ...
16· ·A.· They were mailed to the town administration office
17· · · ·in big boxes.
18· ·Q.· Okay.· So did someone point the boxes out in the
19· · · ·hallway to you or something like that that these
20· · · ·things had come in?· In whose office?· Who was the
21· · · ·one to receive them?
22· ·A.· It would have been the front desk clerk.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you know where they went and who looked
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
127
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·at them after that?
·2· ·A.· They went into my office and Jennifer Boucher and I
·3· · · ·looked through the boxes.· And then we put them in
·4· · · ·binders in chronological order, or had someone put
·5· · · ·them in binders in chronological order.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you recall month and year when that would
·7· · · ·have occurred as far as, again, when you went
·8· · · ·through or going through those and found out?
·9· ·A.· It would have the summer of 2023, I believe.
10· ·Q.· Okay.
11· ·A.· Early summer of '23.
12· ·Q.· What conversation, if any, did you have with
13· · · ·members of the board of selectmen after you
14· · · ·discovered what was in those documents from DTC
15· · · ·that the board had been considering or looking at
16· · · ·terminating you in that position?
17· ·A.· What conversations did I have with the board?
18· ·Q.· Yes.
19· ·A.· Well, specifically we had them put in binders and
20· · · ·then they were put in the middle room for the board
21· · · ·to review.· And so obviously I would have made them
22· · · ·aware that we had received the documents they
23· · · ·requested and they were ready for their review in
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
128
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·the middle room.
·2· · · · · · · · ·And that they, after reading through,
·3· · · ·supported everything that Fred Garofalo had said
·4· · · ·with regards to what the board of 2022 was trying
·5· · · ·to do and my feelings through that whole time.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.· So what's your recollection of
·7· · · ·Mr. Garofalo's position with respect to the board
·8· · · ·of selectmen hiring or retaining DTC for the rate
·9· · · ·setting issue and/or personnel issue, we will just
10· · · ·characterize it as or refer to it as?· What's your
11· · · ·understanding of what his position on retaining DTC
12· · · ·was?
13· ·A.· So when he would come in to see me and speak with
14· · · ·Jennifer and I, he made it very clear he was
15· · · ·oppositional to that.· He didn't think it was
16· · · ·necessary.
17· ·Q.· And that was direct conversations with him?
18· ·A.· That was him coming into the, uh-huh.
19· ·Q.· Where does the Town currently stand with respect to
20· · · ·payment of the invoices that DTC has submitted to
21· · · ·the Town?
22· ·A.· The invoices are still unpaid.
23· ·Q.· And whose decision is it to not pay those invoices?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
129
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· At this point it's with the board of selectmen.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you know when the last time was that they
·3· · · ·considered or took up the issue as to pay or not
·4· · · ·pay those?
·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·6· ·Q.· You can answer.
·7· ·A.· Specifically, I couldn't recall.
·8· ·Q.· Okay.· Has that, the issue as to whether the Town
·9· · · ·should pay or not pay DTC invoices, has that been
10· · · ·taken up by the current composition of the board of
11· · · ·selectmen?
12· ·A.· It's something that obviously gets discussed during
13· · · ·this, any meetings they have related to this
14· · · ·matter.
15· ·Q.· Okay.· So this is document, it's an email attached
16· · · ·to the Town's motion for summary judgment, Exhibit
17· · · ·No. 54.· If you could take a look at that and then
18· · · ·just let me know when you're done.
19· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 5, 7/12/23 Email, marked for
20· · · ·identification.)
21· ·Q.· Okay.· You've had a chance to take a look at this
22· · · ·four-page document with your attorney?
23· ·A.· Yes.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
130
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· And the third page in, counting the cover sheet,
·2· · · ·page, down at the bottom it's page 2 of a chain of
·3· · · ·emails.· Second-to-last paragraph, the bottom
·4· · · ·portion of it, email between Attorney Chris Hawkins
·5· · · ·and Naomi Butterfield with the Mitchell Group, the
·6· · · ·last, very last sentence of that second-to-last
·7· · · ·paragraph says, I was assured that there is no
·8· · · ·intent to refuse to pay your fees.· The board and
·9· · · ·Brigitte just want to know what the fees were for
10· · · ·as the narratives were general and those who met
11· · · ·with you are now gone, (except for Kevin).· Do you
12· · · ·see that sentence?
13· ·A.· I do.
14· ·Q.· When did you tell Attorney Butterfield that the
15· · · ·Town didn't have an intent to refuse to pay DTC's
16· · · ·fees?
17· ·A.· I don't recall saying that to her.· That might have
18· · · ·been what she got out of our conversation.
19· ·Q.· Okay.· How many conversations or emails, so how
20· · · ·many conversations or communications have you had
21· · · ·with Attorney Butterfield regarding DTC's invoices
22· · · ·regarding the rate setting issue or the personnel
23· · · ·issue?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
131
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·2· ·Q.· You can answer.
·3· ·A.· There weren't many because Naomi doesn't represent
·4· · · ·us for Woodsville-related matters.· Chris Hawkins
·5· · · ·had independently reached out to her.
·6· ·Q.· Do you recall having any conversations or
·7· · · ·communications with Attorney Butterfield regarding
·8· · · ·DTC invoices?
·9· ·A.· I think it was just this one when she got this
10· · · ·email or request from Chris Hawkins, and she called
11· · · ·me to say, What is this.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· In that same sentence it says, The board and
13· · · ·Brigitte just want to know what the fees were for.
14· · · · · · · · ·As of today do you, what do you have, if
15· · · ·anything, for questions or lack of clarity as far
16· · · ·as what the work that was done was for?· Again,
17· · · ·within the context of that sentence.
18· ·A.· All right.· From my perspective there was no work,
19· · · ·but the boxes kind of explained what they were
20· · · ·trying to bill us for; we could correlate.
21· ·Q.· Can you explain in a little bit more detail what
22· · · ·you mean by "there was no work"?
23· ·A.· From my perspective DTC wasn't working for us.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
132
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·They didn't have authority to work for us.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.
·3· ·A.· And I wasn't involved with them.
·4· ·Q.· So is there, with all the documents that you've
·5· · · ·seen up to today, is, what do you have as far as
·6· · · ·any questions that DTC didn't draft the letters,
·7· · · ·didn't send out emails or have communications with
·8· · · ·people at DRA or Councilor Warmington or -- do you
·9· · · ·have, what do you have for any doubts that DTC did
10· · · ·not do work or perform services that are reflected
11· · · ·in the invoices?
12· ·A.· They didn't do that for the Town.
13· ·Q.· Okay.· So is it fair to say they may have done
14· · · ·those activities or done that stuff, but just not
15· · · ·for the Town; is that fair?
16· ·A.· That would be my perspective, yes.
17· ·Q.· What benefit or value do you see that the work or
18· · · ·services that DTC did as reflected in those
19· · · ·invoices, what value or benefit did the Town
20· · · ·receive?
21· ·A.· I don't think the Town received any benefit. I
22· · · ·think if anything it caused us a great deal of harm
23· · · ·in many ways.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
133
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Okay.· You on behalf the Town retained Drummond
·2· · · ·Woodsum to, you can change the word but I'll use
·3· · · ·it, to use resolve the issue with respect to the
·4· · · ·DRA refusing to set the tax rate for the town;
·5· · · ·correct?· That's why you brought them on board?
·6· ·A.· We continue to use them, yes.
·7· ·Q.· But back then that's why you sort of retained them,
·8· · · ·to resolve that tax setting issue; correct?
·9· ·A.· Yes.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· And that tax rate setting issue with DRA was
11· · · ·resolved; correct?
12· ·A.· It was resolved.
13· ·Q.· Okay.· And according to the documents that you've
14· · · ·reviewed, that also is why the board of selectmen
15· · · ·believed that it had brought DTC on board was to
16· · · ·address or work on that same tax setting issue with
17· · · ·DRA, right.
18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
19· ·Q.· You can answer.
20· ·A.· DTC kept and a few selectmen kept telling the
21· · · ·public that.· That's why they wanted to work with
22· · · ·DTC, was to work on the tax rate setting matter.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· And, again, the tax setting issue was
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
134
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·resolved with DRA?
·2· ·A.· Christine was able to resolve that for us, yes.
·3· ·Q.· That's your understanding, and I understand.· Okay.
·4· · · · · · · · ·So how is it that as far as your
·5· · · ·understanding that the services DTC provided or the
·6· · · ·work that it performed as its position is, on
·7· · · ·behalf of the Town of Haverhill, didn't provide any
·8· · · ·benefit?· I don't want to put the two together,
·9· · · ·didn't provide any benefit or harm, so let's just
10· · · ·take the first half.· So how did what they did did
11· · · ·not provide or supply the town with any benefit?
12· ·A.· From my perspective what they were attempting to do
13· · · ·was duplicative to everything that was already
14· · · ·happening with Drummond Woodsum and us working with
15· · · ·Peter Roth and the DRA directly.
16· · · · · · · · ·So we were already doing all of the
17· · · ·things that DTC suggested that they wanted to do
18· · · ·for the town.
19· ·Q.· Okay.· And how is it that Drummond Woodsum or what
20· · · ·did Drummond Woodsum do before DTC did the same
21· · · ·thing?· Do you have a list of the items or things?
22· ·A.· It's reflected in their invoices as well as emails
23· · · ·that are in the record.· We were meeting with her
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
135
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·regularly.· She was talking with Peter Roth
·2· · · ·regularly.· That's reflected in his letter back to
·3· · · ·DTC that we found in the documents where he says
·4· · · ·she was instrumental in setting the tax rate
·5· · · ·despite what DTC was doing.
·6· ·Q.· And with respect to what you stated just a little
·7· · · ·while ago, it's your position that what DTC did in
·8· · · ·connection with what it was doing when it says it
·9· · · ·was working on behalf of the town regarding the tax
10· · · ·setting issue with DRA, in what ways did what DTC
11· · · ·did or perform harm the town or cause harm to the
12· · · ·town?
13· ·A.· Yeah, so there was harm to most of our
14· · · ·relationships, including Mitchell Group, the DRA,
15· · · ·Drummond Woodsum attorneys, everything became
16· · · ·labored.· Everyone was, all of those different
17· · · ·entities started protecting themselves and being
18· · · ·careful with communications and being guarded with
19· · · ·us.
20· · · · · · · · ·Also other surrounding municipalities
21· · · ·were hearing about things that were going on and it
22· · · ·started to cause labored communications and
23· · · ·relationships with the surrounding communities and
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
136
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·with other organizations that we have to deal with
·2· · · ·on a daily basis, like the NHMA.
·3· ·Q.· The New Hampshire Municipal --
·4· ·A.· Municipal Association.· All of those relationships
·5· · · ·became very careful and guarded.
·6· ·Q.· What do you mean they became careful and guarded?
·7· · · ·Can you explain that?
·8· ·A.· The way that we interacted changed.· You could
·9· · · ·tell, and actually when I reached out to Peter Roth
10· · · ·and asked for information, all of a sudden
11· · · ·everything had to be by RSA 91-A.· They were trying
12· · · ·to protect themselves from whatever was going on
13· · · ·here.
14· ·Q.· Why do you say they were trying to protect
15· · · ·themselves, and protect themselves from what?
16· ·A.· It was my sentiment that they changed how they
17· · · ·interacted with us.
18· ·Q.· Okay.· No one ever informed you that that's what
19· · · ·they were doing or why they were doing it?
20· ·A.· They wouldn't say that explicitly, no.
21· ·Q.· But they didn't say that?
22· ·A.· Not explicitly.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· And then with respect to other towns, how
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
137
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·did interactions change and how do you know that it
·2· · · ·was because of this issue with DTC?
·3· ·A.· Everyone was, everyone was watching and everyone
·4· · · ·was starting to hone in on the fact that there were
·5· · · ·these labored issues with DTC and the Haverhill
·6· · · ·Select Board, and it just changed.
·7· · · · · · · · ·Relationships, I can't explain it.· It's
·8· · · ·just people start to treat you differently; they
·9· · · ·start to interact with you differently; they
10· · · ·communicate with you differently.
11· ·Q.· How so?
12· ·A.· The tone of conversations is not as cordial.
13· ·Q.· Okay.
14· ·A.· People don't want to just talk anymore.· They want
15· · · ·to protect themselves with what they say, guarded
16· · · ·in what they say.
17· ·Q.· How did that result in injury or damage to the
18· · · ·town?
19· ·A.· From my perspective it hurt our reputation and it
20· · · ·hurt our ability and hindered our ability to work
21· · · ·with entities that we needed to interact with every
22· · · ·single day.· We need to have good relationships,
23· · · ·and we had very good relationships prior to this.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
138
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· So how did the actions or omissions or inactions or
·2· · · ·actions or inactions of someone else or some other
·3· · · ·company, how did that harm the reputation of the
·4· · · ·town?
·5· ·A.· Well, specifically with the DRA, Chris Hawkins kept
·6· · · ·trying to communicate with Peter Roth on our
·7· · · ·behalf, and Peter kept telling him we were already
·8· · · ·handling it, and he just wouldn't take no for an
·9· · · ·answer.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· Again, that's the actions of someone else.
11· · · ·How did that harm or injure the town in any way?
12· ·A.· Because then it comes back around.· And when I need
13· · · ·to communicate with Peter Roth he's being, he
14· · · ·know's there's this weird thing going on, and he
15· · · ·just -- they all just started getting guarded.
16· · · · · · · · ·Jamie Dow wouldn't even have an open
17· · · ·discussion with us anymore, and she's our field
18· · · ·rep.
19· ·Q.· Okay.· Were there any other ways in which you
20· · · ·believe that the town was harmed or injured because
21· · · ·of DTC's actions and the work they did?
22· ·A.· Not beyond what I have already explained that I can
23· · · ·recall right now.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
139
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· In connection with the New Hampshire Municipal
·2· · · ·Association, how was the town or its reputation
·3· · · ·harmed or injured there?
·4· ·A.· So we reach out to New Hampshire Municipal Legal
·5· · · ·quite regularly, and unfortunately everyone started
·6· · · ·hearing about all of this.· And so either
·7· · · ·everybody, whenever we would communicate
·8· · · ·informally, they'd want to talk about it, but
·9· · · ·formally they would just be guarded with how they
10· · · ·responded to us.
11· ·Q.· Are there any other ways in which the town was
12· · · ·harmed or injured, given its reputation or
13· · · ·elsewise, with respect to the New Hampshire
14· · · ·Municipal Association?
15· ·A.· No.
16· ·Q.· Okay.· So earlier in your deposition you had stated
17· · · ·that you reached out to DRA regarding Articles 27
18· · · ·and 28 sometime after the deadline for the filing
19· · · ·of any articles or petitions for articles but
20· · · ·before the annual town meeting, right?
21· ·A.· Yes.
22· ·Q.· And I don't recall when that was.· Do you recall
23· · · ·what the deadline was, approximately?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
140
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· Usually it's the first week of February.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.· Does that, the deadline in connection with
·3· · · ·article, Warrant Article 27, Warrant Article 28,
·4· · · ·would have been somewhere in February of 2023;
·5· · · ·correct?
·6· ·A.· For Article 27 and 28?
·7· ·Q.· Yeah?
·8· ·A.· No.
·9· ·Q.· Oh, '22?
10· ·A.· Yeah.
11· ·Q.· 2022.· And then those two articles were put on the
12· · · ·ballot for the warned annual town meeting that had
13· · · ·occurred in, you said March of 2000- --
14· ·A.· 2022.
15· ·Q.· -- '22, and got passed by the voters; correct?
16· ·A.· Yes.
17· ·Q.· All right.· So prior to, prior to February of 2022,
18· · · ·you wouldn't have contacted or called or emailed
19· · · ·DRA; correct?
20· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
21· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Okay.
22· ·Q.· You can answer.
23· ·A.· Not about those articles.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
141
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· I'm sorry?
·2· ·A.· Not necessarily about those articles.
·3· ·Q.· Okay.
·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· Can we go off the record
·5· · · ·for a second?
·6· ·A.· Yeah, not about those articles.
·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Back on the record.
·8· ·Q.· What about any other reason for communicating with
·9· · · ·or reaching out to DRA regarding warrant articles
10· · · ·or articles in general coming from Woodsville?
11· ·A.· Before petitions are filed?
12· ·Q.· Before the, prior to the deadline, the filing,
13· · · ·which you said was February?
14· ·A.· There could, I mean hypothetically there could have
15· · · ·been.· I'm not talking about Woodsville, I'm
16· · · ·talking about in general, individuals who might
17· · · ·come to the town asking for guidance on filing a
18· · · ·warrant article.
19· ·Q.· Okay.
20· ·A.· I don't recall if that, I don't believe that ever
21· · · ·happened with these particular types of articles.
22· ·Q.· Okay.
23· ·A.· I don't recall that.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
142
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· But you didn't have any communication, especially
·2· · · ·email communication, with DRA prior to February of
·3· · · ·2022 with respect to any kind of warrant articles
·4· · · ·coming from or being filed by Woodsville?
·5· ·A.· I wouldn't have communicated with DRA about
·6· · · ·Woodsville articles before they came into the town
·7· · · ·hall because I wouldn't know about them.
·8· · · · · · · · ·I might have communicated with DRA on
·9· · · ·other things.· I do all the time; we communicate
10· · · ·all the time.
11· ·Q.· Okay.· Is there an avenue or is there a majority
12· · · ·way of phone calls or emails?· Is it typically one
13· · · ·way or another?
14· ·A.· We try to pick up the phone and have a
15· · · ·conversation.
16· ·Q.· Okay.
17· ·A.· But of course there are emails.
18· ·Q.· Okay.· Is that something with respect to phone
19· · · ·calls to DRA prior to DTC getting involved, are
20· · · ·those phone calls what you were referring to as
21· · · ·sort of the reputational damage or injury to the
22· · · ·town in interacting with DRA, those phone calls,
23· · · ·those changed?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
143
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· Our communications definitely changed, yes.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.
·3· ·A.· And I think along those lines, if I could just
·4· · · ·elaborate, the response that I eventually saw that
·5· · · ·Peter Roth sent was scathing and in my opinion
·6· · · ·caused an awful lot of harm.· It clearly, his
·7· · · ·opinion of the town was very different after those
·8· · · ·interactions with DTC.
·9· ·Q.· What response are you referring to?· What response
10· · · ·do you have in mind?
11· ·A.· He sent a letter back to DTC --
12· ·Q.· Okay.
13· ·A.· -- admonishing them for the tone of their letter
14· · · ·and the way that they had handled things.
15· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you know, do you know why DTC's letter
16· · · ·was written in the tone or the way that it was that
17· · · ·DTC sent to DRA?
18· ·A.· Why it was written that way?
19· ·Q.· Yes.
20· ·A.· I don't know why they would write something like
21· · · ·that.
22· ·Q.· Okay.
23· ·A.· We had already gotten guidance from Christine to
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
144
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·write a nicely worded letter, and that she had
·2· · · ·already talked to Peter Roth and he would set the
·3· · · ·tax rate.
·4· · · · · · · · ·So the letter in that tone was
·5· · · ·unnecessary at that point that DTC ended up
·6· · · ·sending.
·7· · · · · · · · ·They didn't need to send it at all, but
·8· · · ·the tone was unnecessary at that point.
·9· ·Q.· How long was the, I will characterize it as delay,
10· · · ·because DRA finally did set the tax rate as we now
11· · · ·know, from the time that DRA provided some kind of
12· · · ·notice that they weren't going to set the tax rate
13· · · ·to the time that they actually finally did, do you
14· · · ·recall what the time frame of that was?
15· ·A.· Well, they sent us the letter the end of December.
16· · · ·We knew already that they weren't going to set it
17· · · ·until after the 9th of January anyway.· And by the,
18· · · ·like, the next week, after that procedural defect
19· · · ·meeting, we had gotten notice they were setting the
20· · · ·tax rate.
21· · · · · · · · ·So legitimately the delay was like a
22· · · ·week.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· What was the, during that same time, the end
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
145
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·of 2022, beginning of 2023, what was the board's
·2· · · ·assessment as far as what kind of a delay was
·3· · · ·likely regarding this, the DRA's position on this
·4· · · ·tax rate setting issue?
·5· ·A.· They were aware of that timeline with regards to
·6· · · ·the procedural defect meeting.
·7· ·Q.· And the procedural defect was the grant money or
·8· · · ·something --
·9· ·A.· The school.
10· ·Q.· -- the school had received.· The reason why you
11· · · ·said January 9th it was going to be corrected is
12· · · ·because that was the next meeting that the school
13· · · ·board was going to have?
14· ·A.· I don't know why they said the 9th.· The 9th I
15· · · ·think was a Thursday, if I remember correctly.
16· ·Q.· Okay.
17· ·A.· I don't know why they picked that date.· They don't
18· · · ·usually meet on a Thursday, so I don't know why
19· · · ·they picked that date.
20· ·Q.· Because.· Okay.· So if you guys could take a look
21· · · ·at that.
22· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 6, 1/27/22 Email, marked for
23· · · ·identification.)
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
146
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Okay.· So you've got a one-page document in front
·2· · · ·of you that is a January, an email, January 27th,
·3· · · ·2022?
·4· ·A.· Yup.
·5· ·Q.· Okay.· And this is an email from you to James
·6· · · ·Gerry, G-E-R-R-Y?
·7· ·A.· Gerry, yup.
·8· ·Q.· Gerry.· And then a Jamie Dow, D-O-W.· Who are those
·9· · · ·two individuals?
10· ·A.· Jamie Dow is our field rep.· And James Gerry at the
11· · · ·time was the director.
12· ·Q.· Director of?
13· ·A.· The Municipal, I don't remember his title, but at
14· · · ·DRA.
15· ·Q.· Okay.· At DRA.
16· ·A.· They are both DRA.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· Gotcha.· So on January 27, 2022, why did you
18· · · ·send this email to, I'll just lump them in together
19· · · ·as DRA?
20· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.
21· ·Q.· Go ahead.
22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· This is outside of the scope
23· · · ·of summary judgment and the case in general.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
147
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· No, it's not.
·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· I mean, the Court's April 4th
·3· · · ·order limited the deposition to summary judgment
·4· · · ·and, you know, what happened when two petitioned
·5· · · ·warrant articles were filed.· Outside the scope.
·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· The position is from town
·7· · · ·manager is that the DRA just came about with this,
·8· · · ·and that's where this is going.
·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Okay.
10· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· And, again, the credibility,
11· · · ·as you will see.
12· ·BY MR. SOUCY:
13· ·Q.· So --
14· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· Well, what does credibility
15· · · ·have to do with summary judgment?· The rules for
16· · · ·summary judgment tell us what the --
17· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· The affidavit.
18· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· The nonmoving, the
19· · · ·non-departed closing summary judgment does state
20· · · ·all the inferences in their favor.
21· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Yup.
22· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· So there's no credibility
23· · · ·determination to be made there.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
148
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· If it can be shown as to what
·2· · · ·the facts are in the affidavit are not credible,
·3· · · ·then it goes more than just an inference; it
·4· · · ·actually goes to the substance of the contents of
·5· · · ·the.
·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· So your position is you're
·7· · · ·going to conduct an examination to show that the
·8· · · ·witness is not, is it general credibility or a
·9· · · ·specific instance, I mean --
10· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Both.
11· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· General credibility's got
12· · · ·nothing to do with summary judgment.· The rule of
13· · · ·decision govern that.· It's, a nonmoving party gets
14· · · ·the benefit of all contested issues.
15· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Okay.
16· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· If you want to have, prove
17· · · ·factual things, I mean, you could put them in, you
18· · · ·could create factual issues, I suppose, by having
19· · · ·contradictory evidence but it doesn't have anything
20· · · ·to do with summary judgment if you're trying to say
21· · · ·she's a liar.
22· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Okay.
23· ·BY MR. SOUCY:
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
149
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· So January 27th, 2022, why did you send this email
·2· · · ·to DRA?· Again, we will lump both Mr. Gerry and Dow
·3· · · ·into just DRA.
·4· ·A.· So this would have gone to them for prereview.
·5· ·Q.· For prereview?
·6· ·A.· Uh-huh.· Yes.
·7· ·Q.· So earlier in your deposition today you stated that
·8· · · ·either town, Haverhill, the town manager or the
·9· · · ·assistant town manager once they get a warrant
10· · · ·article from the town clerk, because that's who
11· · · ·receives them on behalf of the town, that text or
12· · · ·the language of the petition is entered into some
13· · · ·kind of computer system that the DRA has; correct?
14· ·A.· That is true too, yes.
15· ·Q.· That is, okay.· That is true that that happens or
16· · · ·is there another way that the information is
17· · · ·initially transmitted to DRA?
18· ·A.· We formally put it into the portal and send it for
19· · · ·a formal prereview.· And, in addition, we at times
20· · · ·will send articles like these to the DRA for
21· · · ·prereview.
22· ·Q.· Okay.· So it could happen either way?
23· ·A.· It has to happen through the portal and it could
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
150
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·also happen that we are sending the petitions for
·2· · · ·prereview.
·3· ·Q.· So was this email one of the additional ways of
·4· · · ·submitting article, both of them, Articles 27 and
·5· · · ·28 for that prereview process?
·6· ·A.· Yup.· And we would do that with others as well,
·7· · · ·depending what the questions were of DRA.
·8· ·Q.· So what was it about Article 27 that caused you,
·9· · · ·not Ms. Boucher, but caused you to submit this
10· · · ·email to DRA for this prereview process?
11· ·A.· Article 27 specifically or both?
12· ·Q.· Yes.
13· ·A.· I don't remember which was which.
14· ·Q.· Okay.
15· ·A.· I'd have to go back and look at which one was fire
16· · · ·and which -- I mean it doesn't really matter, I
17· · · ·guess.
18· ·Q.· Okay.· So if you don't remember which was which,
19· · · ·let's lump them together.· So what about Articles
20· · · ·27 and 28 caused you to send this email as part of
21· · · ·the prereview process that DRA does?
22· ·A.· Well, anything financially related it has to go
23· · · ·through DRA.· And we work with DRA closely on
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
151
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·anything that's tax related, I mean financially
·2· · · ·related.
·3· · · · · · · · ·And so these were going to end up in the
·4· · · ·portal and we needed to know not only from legal
·5· · · ·but from the DRA if these should even be addressed.
·6· · · ·Like how should we deal with these?· These were an
·7· · · ·anomaly.· We had never seen anything like this
·8· · · ·before.
·9· ·Q.· Okay.· And who made the decision to do this
10· · · ·alternate or additional step, not fully
11· · · ·understanding sort of what it is, but who made the
12· · · ·decision to send this email in addition to just
13· · · ·entering in the text of the warrant articles?
14· ·A.· In the case of anomalies like this it would have
15· · · ·been me or Jennifer, and we had done that in the
16· · · ·past.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you recall with respect to Article,
18· · · ·Warrant Article 27, who made the decision?
19· ·A.· Well, I sent this email so --
20· ·Q.· Correct.
21· ·A.· -- I assume both articles were attached, I would
22· · · ·assume, but maybe not because I can't tell.
23· ·Q.· Right.· Do you recall who made the decision at
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
152
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·sending this particular email to DRA as part of the
·2· · · ·prereview process back on January 27th?
·3· ·A.· I'm sure it would have been a conversation between
·4· · · ·Jennifer and I to get DRA's input on this.
·5· ·Q.· Okay.· Is it fair to say you don't recall if it was
·6· · · ·you or if it was Jennifer?
·7· ·A.· I don't recall the exact conversations we had, no.
·8· ·Q.· Okay.· And you also don't recall whose decision it
·9· · · ·was to send the email?
10· ·A.· Ultimately I guess it would have been my decision
11· · · ·because I sent the email.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· I don't want to presume, that's why I'm
13· · · ·asking if you have an actual memory of --
14· ·A.· No --
15· ·Q.· -- whose decision it was?
16· ·A.· No, I don't.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· This is a January 31 email.
18· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 7, 1/31/22 Email, marked for
19· · · ·identification.)
20· ·Q.· Just let me know.· We've marked it with an exhibit
21· · · ·sticker and just let me know when you've had a
22· · · ·chance to look at it.
23· ·A.· Okay.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
153
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Okay.
·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· For the record I will just
·3· · · ·indicate that the second page of this, which in the
·4· · · ·top right corner is a handwritten notation of "35
·5· · · ·registered voters".· There were multiple copies of
·6· · · ·this effectively signature sheet or signature page
·7· · · ·with all of the same typed caption or heading at
·8· · · ·the top.· I just didn't feel the need to replicate
·9· · · ·page after page after page just adding to the
10· · · ·volume but not the substance of this particular
11· · · ·attachment.
12· ·BY MR. SOUCY:
13· ·Q.· So with respect to this two-page exhibit to your
14· · · ·deposition, you've had a chance to look at this
15· · · ·document; correct?
16· ·A.· Yes.
17· ·Q.· And it is an email from you dated January 31st of
18· · · ·2022, again, to the same two individuals at DRA;
19· · · ·correct?
20· ·A.· Exactly.
21· ·Q.· Just so I can cover it, do you have a specific
22· · · ·memory of actually sending this email?
23· ·A.· No.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
154
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· And in the subject line it says, Two new warrant
·2· · · ·articles needing review.· Did you send this email
·3· · · ·to DRA as part of that DRA prereview process?
·4· ·A.· I would have, yes.
·5· ·Q.· Okay.
·6· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 8, 2/2/22 Email, marked for
·7· · · ·identification.)
·8· ·Q.· We have got the next exhibit is, you've had a
·9· · · ·chance to look at this?
10· ·A.· Yup.
11· ·Q.· So we have got an email from yourself dated
12· · · ·February 2nd, 2022, to Mr. Gerry at DRA; correct?
13· ·A.· Yes.
14· ·Q.· Okay.· Having had a chance to look at this email,
15· · · ·do you recall drafting and sending this email?
16· ·A.· I do.
17· ·Q.· Okay.· Why did you send this email to the DRA?
18· ·A.· I sent this email to the DRA after talking to
19· · · ·Drummond Woodsum.· We had requested a legal opinion
20· · · ·on the articles because they were related to the
21· · · ·same funding matter that we had been litigating and
22· · · ·dealing with right along, as well as related to the
23· · · ·legislation that Senator Giuda had worked on.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
155
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · ·So I had reached out and also talked to
·2· · · ·some of the board members about some of the
·3· · · ·information we had gotten, and between Bob Giuda
·4· · · ·and Drummond Woodsum there was a sense, there was a
·5· · · ·general understanding that these were likely
·6· · · ·illegal.
·7· ·Q.· And who were the board members that you spoke to
·8· · · ·prior to sending this email?
·9· ·A.· Matt Bjelobrk, Fred Garofalo.· And we brought, we
10· · · ·did discuss the legal opinion at select board
11· · · ·meetings; and Fred Garofalo read that legal opinion
12· · · ·at the annual town meeting that year.
13· ·Q.· Prior to sending this email, I don't want to say
14· · · ·only, but you spoke with Matt and Fred?
15· ·A.· I remember speaking with both of them.· I might
16· · · ·have spoken with Howard.· And I don't recall the
17· · · ·date of meetings, so I would have to go back and
18· · · ·look at the records to see exactly how it all
19· · · ·played out.
20· ·Q.· Okay.· That was going to be my next -- where did
21· · · ·you speak with Matt and Fred, meaning during a
22· · · ·public meeting or outside of a public meeting?
23· ·A.· They would all visit my office --
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
156
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Okay.
·2· ·A.· -- individually to have conversations about a
·3· · · ·variety of things.
·4· ·Q.· Okay.· And that's where they, you recall having a
·5· · · ·conversation or where it could have or where it
·6· · · ·likely is?· I just want to make sure --
·7· ·A.· That's really the only place I would have
·8· · · ·conversations with them would be my office other
·9· · · ·than a board meeting, which would be on the record.
10· ·Q.· Do you have a specific memory or recollection of
11· · · ·where you had the discussion with each of them
12· · · ·before sending this out?
13· ·A.· Not specifically.
14· ·Q.· Okay.· So in looking at this email in sum or in
15· · · ·total, you are asking at the bottom of the first
16· · · ·page, We formally ask that you disallow both the
17· · · ·attached warrant articles, and then the next line
18· · · ·down, By disallowing these articles, department of
19· · · ·revenue will admonish any similar future attempts
20· · · ·by districts throughout New Hampshire.· Do you see
21· · · ·those two lines?
22· ·A.· I do.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· So when you stated on that second-to-last
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
157
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·sentence on the first page, bottom of the first
·2· · · ·page, We formally ask, who is the, quote/unquote,
·3· · · ·we on that line?
·4· ·A.· Collectively the town.
·5· ·Q.· And how is it that you as the town manager were
·6· · · ·speaking or expressing the request on behalf of the
·7· · · ·entire town?
·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.
·9· ·Q.· You can answer.
10· ·A.· As town manager it was my responsibility to not
11· · · ·only communicate with the DRA but also regarding
12· · · ·anything to do with legal, and so I was working
13· · · ·with Drummond Woodsum on the legal aspects of this.
14· · · ·I was working with the DRA as well, and working
15· · · ·with my counterpart in my office, which was
16· · · ·Jennifer Boucher, and then keeping the board
17· · · ·appraised, which was my responsibility to keep them
18· · · ·appraised of things that were significant.
19· ·Q.· So do you recall when or which public meeting
20· · · ·during which you spoke to the board and/or got
21· · · ·instruction from the board of selectmen to send
22· · · ·this email or something like it?
23· ·A.· I didn't need the board's approval to send this
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
158
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·email.· They didn't, they don't micromanage the
·2· · · ·town manager in that way.
·3· · · · · · · · ·And I don't recall the actual meeting
·4· · · ·where we talked about the legal opinion.· I would
·5· · · ·have to go back and look at the minutes.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.· Is it your recollection that whichever
·7· · · ·meeting, public meeting that it was that Fred read
·8· · · ·Drummond Woodsum's written opinion or assessment,
·9· · · ·it would have been that same meeting that the board
10· · · ·expressed either their request or their desire for
11· · · ·this email to be sent out or to ask the DRA?
12· ·A.· This email was not something that the board
13· · · ·directed.· So, sending an email like this to the
14· · · ·DRA is not something the board would have directed
15· · · ·me to do.
16· ·Q.· Okay.· And you otherwise just stated that you
17· · · ·didn't actually need their permission or approval?
18· ·A.· To send an email to the DRA.
19· ·Q.· Okay.· But specifically this email that is asking,
20· · · ·We formally ask you to disallow, you didn't even
21· · · ·need that authority from the board?
22· ·A.· I don't believe I did, no.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· The very last line, which I already read,
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
159
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·speaks to or asks or in asking DRA to disallow
·2· · · ·these articles will admonish other districts
·3· · · ·throughout New Hampshire.· Is that something that's
·4· · · ·within your role and your responsibilities for the
·5· · · ·Town of Haverhill?
·6· ·A.· I was reiterating what Bob Giuda had already made
·7· · · ·clear with regards to his intent with the
·8· · · ·legislation related to Woodsville, statements that
·9· · · ·had been made related to the precariousness of
10· · · ·allowing a district to do so.
11· ·Q.· Okay.· How was that within your role in the scope
12· · · ·of the town manager's position with respect to
13· · · ·pointing out that DRA could admonish other
14· · · ·districts?
15· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.
16· ·Q.· You can answer.
17· ·A.· I guess I don't understand what you're asking.
18· ·Q.· Okay.· Well, by this and through this email you're
19· · · ·not only asking DRA to disallow both of the warrant
20· · · ·articles, but also pointing out to DRA that doing
21· · · ·so will send the message to other districts in
22· · · ·other towns, not just, you know, the three other
23· · · ·districts, you know, Woodsville, but the other
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
160
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·three, not just the other districts in the confines
·2· · · ·of Haverhill, but all of the other misbehaving
·3· · · ·districts in other towns in all of New Hampshire.
·4· · · ·How is that within the role of the town manager for
·5· · · ·the Town of Haverhill?
·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·7· ·Q.· You can answer.
·8· ·A.· From my perspective I was just making a statement
·9· · · ·of fact that by doing so it would set that stage.
10· · · ·It would set a precedent for what was a proper
11· · · ·thing to do and not a proper thing to do.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· On the next page, the second-to-last
13· · · ·paragraph, you wrote, Please, we ask you to help
14· · · ·the people of New Hampshire to clearly understand
15· · · ·the laws of the State of New Hampshire by
16· · · ·disallowing these articles.
17· · · · · · · · ·Again, how did you believe that it was
18· · · ·within your scope as town manager for the Town of
19· · · ·Haverhill?
20· ·A.· Well, I definitely believe I had a duty as a town
21· · · ·manager in relation to my peers as other town
22· · · ·managers, and we often talk about how the laws are
23· · · ·applied in our different municipalities.· So that
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
161
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·was a general statement as well that to help us
·2· · · ·all, let's make the playing field clear.
·3· ·Q.· After that February 2nd email to the DRA, do you
·4· · · ·recall or remember how many more emails you sent to
·5· · · ·DRA regarding this tax rate setting issue?
·6· ·A.· After this I think most of my emails were fact
·7· · · ·responses, like sending information that was
·8· · · ·requested of us, but I don't recall exactly; I
·9· · · ·would have to go back and look at the records.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· And some of those dealt with DRA's or Peter
11· · · ·Roth's questions about the backdrop, right, the
12· · · ·history of where all of the districts --
13· ·A.· Hundred-and-something years.
14· ·Q.· Going back to the buggy whip days, right?
15· ·A.· Yeah.
16· ·Q.· Other than that or in addition to that, do you know
17· · · ·how many other, do you recall how many other emails
18· · · ·you sent to the DRA?
19· ·A.· I don't recall.
20· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you recall sending additional emails?
21· ·A.· I recall a lot of emails trying to get Peter the
22· · · ·information he was looking for; that's what I
23· · · ·remember.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
162
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· How about outside or beyond providing historical
·2· · · ·documents and background to Woodsville and the
·3· · · ·other districts, do you recall?
·4· ·A.· I don't recall.
·5· ·Q.· If there are at least five additional emails that
·6· · · ·you sent to DRA regarding the two warrant articles
·7· · · ·that are in addition to the information that DRA
·8· · · ·asked for in connection with its pre-approval or
·9· · · ·prereview process, does that sound about right?
10· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
11· ·Q.· You can answer.
12· ·A.· I honestly don't remember.
13· ·Q.· Okay.· You do recall sending other ones that didn't
14· · · ·relate to the historical background, though?
15· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.
16· ·Q.· You can answer.
17· ·A.· I don't remember that.· I don't remember.
18· ·Q.· Do you recall any of the members of the board or
19· · · ·the board of selectmen itself asking you regarding
20· · · ·communications that you had with DRA?
21· ·A.· I just remember one, and that was Kevin Knapp.
22· ·Q.· And what did he ask?
23· ·A.· I don't remember exactly what he asked.· It was an
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
163
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·incredibly busy day and he asked for an enormous
·2· · · ·amount of information and he wanted it by the end
·3· · · ·of the day, which was absolutely impossible.
·4· ·Q.· Okay.· And what was your response to that email
·5· · · ·request?
·6· ·A.· I told him something along the lines of most of our
·7· · · ·communications are on the phone, something like
·8· · · ·that.
·9· ·Q.· Okay.· And did you say that it was an incredibly
10· · · ·busy day and you'd get back to him the next day or
11· · · ·later that week or anything?
12· ·A.· No, that particular interaction was one of
13· · · ·literally hundreds I was getting from him and Katie
14· · · ·that were overwhelming our office with requests
15· · · ·that were really outside the scope of us just doing
16· · · ·our day-to-day business.· So it was one of many. I
17· · · ·literally had hundreds of emails from Katie.· I was
18· · · ·just overwhelmed at the time.
19· ·Q.· So how is it that you then don't respond to members
20· · · ·of a board of selectmen requesting information
21· · · ·about something that's so vitally important to the
22· · · ·town?
23· ·A.· From my perspective --
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
164
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·2· ·Q.· You can answer.
·3· ·A.· At that time I didn't see that as anything vital.
·4· · · ·It absolutely was not, it did not rise to that
·5· · · ·level for me at all.
·6· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 9, 1/6/23 Email, marked for
·7· · · ·identification.)
·8· ·Q.· So I just gave you a, my apologies, but a
·9· · · ·photograph of -- let me back up, a printout of a
10· · · ·photograph of an email.· I don't know how many more
11· · · ·times we can insert different types of technology
12· · · ·in there and still have something tangible in our
13· · · ·hands.
14· · · · · · · · ·But we have an email, a representation, a
15· · · ·printout of an email from May 5th of 2022, and a
16· · · ·core email is from you to Kevin Knapp.· Do you,
17· · · ·just let me know when you guys have had a chance to
18· · · ·review that.
19· ·A.· I'm good.
20· ·Q.· Okay.· So down toward the bottom Kevin Knapp sends
21· · · ·an email to you and CC'd Katie Williams.· Katie
22· · · ·Williams at that time was a member of the board of
23· · · ·selectmen; correct?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
165
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· Yes.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.· So May 5th, 2022, at 10:29 a.m. Kevin Knapp,
·3· · · ·a board member, sends you, then town manager, an
·4· · · ·email saying Good morning, Brigitte.· Can you
·5· · · ·forward me all emails sent and received from the
·6· · · ·DRA.· Anything that has to do with the Warrant
·7· · · ·Articles 27 and 28.· I would like them by the end
·8· · · ·of the business day.· I would like to be able to
·9· · · ·answer any questions that may arise in this case.
10· · · · · · · · ·Does it look like I read that correctly?
11· ·A.· You did.
12· ·Q.· Okay.· Again, wish for a better copy but this is
13· · · ·what we have.· So you, it appears from what you
14· · · ·already explained, recall this email?
15· ·A.· I do.
16· ·Q.· Okay.· And then roughly half an hour later on the
17· · · ·same day, May 5th, 2022, you respond or reply to
18· · · ·Kevin and CC the assistant town manager, Hello,
19· · · ·Kevin.· The DRA rarely puts anything in email.
20· · · ·They call us or we call them except for formal
21· · · ·notifications (such as attached).
22· · · · · · · · ·With respect to the emails that we have
23· · · ·gone over and the additional emails that you sent
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
166
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·to the DRA regarding these two articles, Warrant
·2· · · ·Articles 27 and 28, what would you say about the
·3· · · ·accuracy of your statement there or your sentence
·4· · · ·there about the DRA rarely puts anything in email?
·5· ·A.· They don't.· Compared to the number of phone calls
·6· · · ·we have with them.
·7· ·Q.· So it's a relative to phone calls explanation.
·8· ·A.· Yeah.· I mean, yes, or in general.
·9· ·Q.· Okay.· And Kevin's email down below that we already
10· · · ·read didn't ask just for emails from DRA, but he
11· · · ·asked to forward me all the emails sent and
12· · · ·received, so it's a to and from.
13· · · · · · · · ·You sent him back that response, but you
14· · · ·never indicated that there were all of these emails
15· · · ·that had been sent from the Town to the DRA, right?
16· ·A.· I told him specifically that he should go and reach
17· · · ·out -- and it wasn't even him.· So the way this
18· · · ·worded made it sound like he was probably looking
19· · · ·for information for someone else, which happened a
20· · · ·lot at that time.
21· · · · · · · · ·And from my perspective, I was, I didn't
22· · · ·have the time to do that, and that he should ask,
23· · · ·tell that individual to go and ask the DRA.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
167
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Okay.· Can you kind of unpack that for us?· So when
·2· · · ·you got the email back in early May of 2022, what
·3· · · ·in addition to what's actually written here did you
·4· · · ·see or understand that somehow Kevin's email might
·5· · · ·have been the product of somebody over his shoulder
·6· · · ·or something?
·7· ·A.· So this is out of context to what was happening at
·8· · · ·that time.
·9· ·Q.· Yeah, could you explain what was going on that you
10· · · ·understood it that way?
11· ·A.· Katie and Kevin had become notorious for taking
12· · · ·requests from residents and then wanting me to feed
13· · · ·them information so then they could go back and
14· · · ·respond.· And I had systematically tried to direct
15· · · ·them that if someone has a question for town
16· · · ·administration, just send them to town
17· · · ·administration.· If they have a question of the
18· · · ·DRA, send them to the DRA.· Like we can't play this
19· · · ·round robin; nobody has time for that.
20· · · · · · · · ·And so this from my perspective was just
21· · · ·another one of those where he was trying to get
22· · · ·information for somebody else, and that's why I
23· · · ·directed him to the DRA.· That specifically anyone
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
168
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·looking for information should call the DRA.
·2· · · · · · · · ·And in the middle of all this, this is us
·3· · · ·prepping for town meeting.· I was in the middle of
·4· · · ·advisory budget committee meetings, which happened
·5· · · ·rapid-fire during this time frame, and preparing
·6· · · ·for those.· We usually have 14, 15 advisory budget
·7· · · ·committee meetings in January, getting ready for
·8· · · ·town meeting, getting ready for the budget,
·9· · · ·workshop budget hearing, all of that happened end
10· · · ·of December to the first week of February.· It's a
11· · · ·very busy business time and so I was incredibly
12· · · ·busy.· And for a general question or request for
13· · · ·everything.· Go back and look for every email
14· · · ·you've ever sent to the DRA, you know.· I was like
15· · · ·I don't have time for this.· And so I was trying to
16· · · ·direct him to go get the information or if it was
17· · · ·for somebody else, tell them to go get the
18· · · ·information somewhere else.
19· ·Q.· Had, going back to that time frame, had Kevin Knapp
20· · · ·sent you other or different requests prior to this
21· · · ·one for other types of information?
22· ·A.· Both him and Katie were doing that a lot --
23· ·Q.· Okay.· What --
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
169
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· -- for all sorts --
·2· ·Q.· What did Kevin previously ask you for that you
·3· · · ·understood was him gathering documents or
·4· · · ·information for other residents?
·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.
·6· ·Q.· Go ahead.
·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Outside the scope of summary
·8· · · ·judgment.
·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Looking for the context of
10· · · ·this --
11· ·A.· It could be just about anything --
12· ·Q.· Okay.
13· ·A.· -- from what did the highway crew do yesterday to
14· · · ·what did we purchase for gloves last week.· You
15· · · ·know, it just was a little bit of everything.
16· ·Q.· Okay.· And were those two things actual requests
17· · · ·that Kevin had made, though?
18· ·A.· Those are two things he had, but there were
19· · · ·numerous others.
20· ·Q.· Okay.· And no time after your email reply on May
21· · · ·5th of 2022 did you follow back up with him and ask
22· · · ·whether it was for him or a resident, or didn't
23· · · ·forward him on to a copy of any of the other
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
170
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·emails, right?
·2· ·A.· No.· And actually when this showed up in the packet
·3· · · ·of information we got back from DTC a year later, I
·4· · · ·was surprised this was even in here because this
·5· · · ·was so insignificant to me.
·6· ·Q.· Okay.
·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Can we take a break?
·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Yeah.
·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Can we go off the record.
10· · · · · · · · ·(Recess taken.)
11· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Back on the record.
12· ·BY MR. SOUCY:
13· ·Q.· Okay, Ms. Codling.· We took a brief break.· We are
14· · · ·back on the record.· You are still under oath.· At
15· · · ·paragraph 35 of your affidavit, and it's attached
16· · · ·to the Town's Motion for Summary Judgment, you
17· · · ·stated that on March 14, 2023, Steve Robbins was
18· · · ·voted out of office.· Is that an accurate
19· · · ·statement?
20· ·A.· If that was the town meeting vote, then yes.
21· ·Q.· Okay.· Was he voted out of office or more accurate
22· · · ·to say he wasn't reelected 2023?
23· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
171
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· Okay.· Go ahead.
·2· ·A.· He didn't win his seat.
·3· ·Q.· He ran for reelection and didn't win?
·4· ·A.· Yes.· Yes.
·5· ·Q.· What, how have you been injured or damaged with
·6· · · ·respect to DTC's actions as far as anxiety or
·7· · · ·anything that you allege you've been caused to go
·8· · · ·through or --
·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· Objection.· This has
10· · · ·nothing to do with summary judgment.
11· · · · · · · · ·Don't answer.
12· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· All right.
13· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 10, Text Messages, marked for
14· · · ·identification.)
15· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· I just wanted to add to my
16· · · ·objection.· Not only does it not have anything to
17· · · ·do with the summary judgment, it has nothing to do
18· · · ·with the contract action at all either.
19· ·BY MR. SOUCY:
20· ·Q.· Okay.· I have given you and your attorney three
21· · · ·pages, color photocopies.· You can take a look at
22· · · ·those and just let me know when you've had a chance
23· · · ·to look at them.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
172
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · · · · · · ·(Pause.)
·2· ·A.· Good.
·3· ·Q.· All set?
·4· ·A.· Yeah.
·5· ·Q.· So you've had a chance to take a look at these
·6· · · ·three pages?· Can you identify or explain what
·7· · · ·these are?
·8· ·A.· They look like text messages between me and Mike
·9· · · ·Graham.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· Sorry to split hairs, but they look like it
11· · · ·or they are?
12· ·A.· Yeah.· I don't remember them, but yes.
13· ·Q.· Okay.· You don't recall providing these in
14· · · ·connection with responses to requests for
15· · · ·documents?
16· ·A.· I don't think I provided these.
17· ·Q.· Do you have a work phone that the town provides or
18· · · ·a personal phone that you use for work?
19· ·A.· I have a work phone.
20· ·Q.· Okay.· So you don't recall providing copies of
21· · · ·screenshots to text messages or anything else?
22· ·A.· I don't remember these at all.
23· ·Q.· Okay.· And do you recall back in, the dates are in
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
173
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·the center of these pages, January 9th and then
·2· · · ·January 10th at the bottom of the third page, text
·3· · · ·messages between you and Mike Graham regarding the
·4· · · ·topics that are in here about emergency meeting
·5· · · ·5:00 p.m. on the 9th?
·6· ·A.· I know we had one.· I don't remember this at all.
·7· ·Q.· You don't remember the text message exchange?
·8· ·A.· No.
·9· ·Q.· Okay.· All right.
10· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 11, Text Messages Continued,
11· · · ·marked for identification.)
12· ·A.· I'm good.
13· ·Q.· All set?· So you've taken a look at those six
14· · · ·pages?· As I stated earlier, the first three pages
15· · · ·of the newest, latest packet you've got the first
16· · · ·three pages are black-and-white copies or printouts
17· · · ·of the three pages from Exhibit 10.· The first
18· · · ·three pages of Exhibit 10 are the first three pages
19· · · ·of Exhibit 11.· I'd just like to you match them up
20· · · ·on your own --
21· ·A.· Okay.
22· ·Q.· -- just to verify.· All right.· So then the fourth
23· · · ·page is text messages that you sent and received
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
174
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·and not on January 9th or 10th, now we are up to
·2· · · ·January 14th.· And you state that your stress
·3· · · ·levels are through the roof regarding this.· I want
·4· · · ·to resolve this tax rate issue.· Do you see that
·5· · · ·right at the top of the fourth page?
·6· ·A.· I do.· This is an email, this is a text chain not
·7· · · ·with Mike Graham, though.
·8· ·Q.· Not with Mike Graham?
·9· ·A.· No.
10· ·Q.· And who was it, so the text messages that appear on
11· · · ·the second set of three pages, the last page 4, 5
12· · · ·and 6 of this Exhibit 11, you've looked at them.
13· · · ·Do you recall with whom you were texting?
14· ·A.· Steve Robbins.
15· ·Q.· Okay.· And then the second message down, the 14th
16· · · ·still.· The tax rate will be set on Tuesday.
17· · · · · · · · ·You replied, Hope so.· All tax rates?· Do
18· · · ·you see all of that?
19· ·A.· Uh-huh.
20· ·Q.· And we go on to the second-to-last page, and that's
21· · · ·when you start indicating or talking about Drummond
22· · · ·Woodsum or Christine at Drummond Woodsum?
23· ·A.· Yup.
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
175
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·Q.· And that's where you type in this phrase, A nicely
·2· · · ·worded letter.· You had testified or explained
·3· · · ·about that the Drummond Woodsum had explained to
·4· · · ·you in your role as the town manager that a nicely
·5· · · ·worded letter to DRA would basically get them to
·6· · · ·set the tax rate, right?
·7· ·A.· Yes.
·8· ·Q.· That's the context that you're explaining?
·9· ·A.· Yes.
10· ·Q.· So the next message then is, If the SB -- select
11· · · ·board; is that right?
12· ·A.· Yes.
13· ·Q.· -- has clear conflicts -- what were you talking
14· · · ·about with respect to the conflicts at that point
15· · · ·in time, January 14th?
16· ·A.· Specifically the issues that Jennifer Boucher and I
17· · · ·had brought up to the select board about the
18· · · ·possibility of Christopher Hawkins being involved
19· · · ·in this.
20· ·Q.· Okay.· So on that date at that point in time you
21· · · ·knew that the board of selectmen or SB, select
22· · · ·board, was communicating with DTC and there was
23· · · ·some question or issue about a conflict of
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
176
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·interest?
·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
·3· ·Q.· You can answer.
·4· ·A.· We were aware that there was something going on.
·5· ·Q.· Okay.· And then the final message on that page at
·6· · · ·the bottom of that, Also if the SB voted in the
·7· · · ·nonmeeting to retain DTC for the tax rate matter,
·8· · · ·then I recommend you ratify that in a vote in a
·9· · · ·publicly warned meeting to keep us all out of
10· · · ·trouble.· Follow the procedure, basically; is that
11· · · ·accurate?
12· ·A.· I did write that.
13· ·Q.· Okay.· And what was your understanding at that time
14· · · ·as to the board of selectmen voting to retain DTC
15· · · ·and that vote occurring in a nonmeeting?
16· ·A.· What I was trying to say there was that it couldn't
17· · · ·happen in a nonmeeting.· If they wanted to do
18· · · ·something with regards to retaining an attorney,
19· · · ·they needed to do it in a publicly warned meeting.
20· ·Q.· Okay.· Did you know as of January 14th whether or
21· · · ·not the board of selectmen voted during a
22· · · ·nonmeeting to retain DTC with respect to the tax
23· · · ·setting issue?
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
177
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· ·A.· I had no idea.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.
·3· ·A.· What had occurred in any nonmeeting.
·4· ·Q.· You knew that there was some, there were
·5· · · ·discussions about it after that, you didn't have
·6· · · ·more detail?
·7· ·A.· I didn't have any detail.
·8· ·Q.· Okay.· And then on the last page you go on to say,
·9· · · ·Okay.· Jennifer and I didn't get the intention of
10· · · ·the motion made.· That was or is the difference in
11· · · ·understanding between you and Jennifer
12· · · ·understanding that the board just said go out and
13· · · ·contact DTC about the tax rate setting issues, but
14· · · ·the board's understanding that the motion made and
15· · · ·the vote taken was that they intended for DTC to be
16· · · ·retained; is that fair to say?
17· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form.
18· ·Q.· You can answer.
19· ·A.· Say that again.
20· ·Q.· Yeah.· So this first full text on the last page,
21· · · ·Okay.· Jennifer and I didn't get the intention of
22· · · ·the motion.· What does that refer to?
23· ·A.· Well, there was another, there were other texts in
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
178
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·between these.
·2· ·Q.· Okay.
·3· ·A.· And so for me it was that I was trying to reiterate
·4· · · ·to Steve that having an intent to do something
·5· · · ·isn't the same thing as doing something.· And the
·6· · · ·motion that was made was very clear.
·7· ·Q.· Okay.
·8· ·A.· So having an intent, it still doesn't achieve what
·9· · · ·they were potentially looking to do.
10· ·Q.· Okay.· And so at this point in time, again
11· · · ·January 14th, what's your understanding as to the
12· · · ·board of selectmen's belief or understanding as to
13· · · ·whether or not DTC, they had actually retained DTC?
14· ·A.· Well, we had gotten that call from Cinde Warmington
15· · · ·suggesting that she had talked to our attorney,
16· · · ·which was Christopher Hawkins.· Jennifer had sent
17· · · ·an email back to Christopher, I mean Eric Maher,
18· · · ·saying that long email where she says, You have not
19· · · ·been retained.· We haven't seen an engagement
20· · · ·letter.· We haven't seen a conflict waiver.· You
21· · · ·couldn't waive your conflict anyway because it was
22· · · ·too gross.
23· · · · · · · · ·And then Eric Maher has sent a letter
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
179
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·back to her saying, We were retained.· And so this
·2· · · ·is kind of where this discussion started.
·3· ·Q.· Okay.· The last two, well, last three text
·4· · · ·messages, first of which is from you, Do I need to
·5· · · ·draft the letter I mentioned in my email or is DTC
·6· · · ·taking action for us?
·7· · · · · · · · ·Steve Robbins replies, DTC.· I'm of the
·8· · · ·impression that it's done.
·9· · · · · · · · ·And you responded, Okay.· You were
10· · · ·responding "okay" to what?
11· ·A.· From my perspective in this I was trying to get
12· · · ·information out of Steve.· I wasn't conceding to
13· · · ·anything.
14· ·Q.· So, by saying, Okay, what information were you
15· · · ·trying to get out of him or from him?
16· ·A.· With regards to that okay, at that point I just
17· · · ·needed to know if I was writing a letter.· Again,
18· · · ·this is a very busy time.· I just needed to know.
19· · · ·Just tell me what you want me to do.
20· · · · · · · · ·And from, with this chain -- Steve had
21· · · ·been very pushy about insisting that I communicate
22· · · ·with DTC; and I had been very clear that I didn't
23· · · ·feel that was appropriate.· And so this was very
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
180
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
·1· · · ·awkward even trying to discuss with him, Am I
·2· · · ·writing the letter, am I'm not writing a letter?
·3· · · ·What are you trying to do?· If you're going to do
·4· · · ·something, do it in a publicly warned meeting.· Do
·5· · · ·it properly.· Like it was this weird time working
·6· · · ·with him.
·7· ·Q.· And so to what did you respond, Okay?
·8· ·A.· Whether I had to write the letter or not.· I just
·9· · · ·needed to know if I was still doing what Fred told
10· · · ·me to do.
11· ·Q.· Okay.
12· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· I believe those are all the
13· · · ·questions I have.· The note that we are going to
14· · · ·suspend the deposition of Ms. Codling pending the
15· · · ·outcome of the motion for summary judgment and
16· · · ·whether or not discovery and the lawsuit continues.
17· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· All right.
18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Okay.
19· · · · · · · · ·(Whereupon, the deposition was suspended
20· · · ·at 2:56 p.m.)
21
22
23
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
181
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
·1· · · · · · · · · ·E R R A T A· ·P A G E
·2
· · · · · I, BRIGITTE CODLING, have read the transcript of
·3· ·my deposition held on May 20, 2024, in the matter TOWN
· · ·OF HAVERHILL V. DTC, and the same is true and correct,
·4· ·to the best of my knowledge, with the exception of the
· · ·following changes noted below, if any:
·5
· · ·Page/Line· · · · · · · · · ·Change/Reason
·6
· · ·____________· · ·___________________________________
·7
· · ·____________· · ·___________________________________
·8
· · ·____________· · ·___________________________________
·9
· · ·____________· · ·___________________________________
10
· · ·____________· · ·___________________________________
11
· · ·____________· · ·___________________________________
12
· · ·____________· · ·___________________________________
13
· · ·____________· · ·___________________________________
14
· · ·____________· · ·___________________________________
15
· · ·____________· · ·___________________________________
16
· · ·____________· · ·___________________________________
17
· · ·____________· · ·___________________________________
18
· · · · · · · · ___________________________________
19· · · · · · · · · · · BRIGITTE CODLING
20
· · · · · Sworn to and subscribed before me,
21· ·this the _____ day of ___________, 2025.
22· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·____________________________
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Notary Public
23· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·My commission expires:
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
182
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
·1· · · · · · · ·C E R T I F I C A T E
·2
·3· · · · · I, Dawn L. Griffin-Smith, a Licensed Court
·4· ·Reporter and Notary Public of the State of New
·5· ·Hampshire, do hereby certify that the foregoing is
·6· ·a true and accurate transcript of my stenographic
·7· ·notes of the deposition of· BRIGITTE CODLING, who
·8· ·was duly sworn, taken at the place and on the date
·9· ·hereinbefore set forth.
10· · · · · I further certify that I am neither
11· ·attorney or counsel for, nor related to or
12· ·employed by any of the parties to the action in
13· ·which this deposition was taken, and further that
14· ·I am not a relative or employee of any attorney or
15· ·counsel employed in this case, nor am I
16· ·financially interested in this action.
17
18
· · · · · ·_________________________________
19· · · · · · · Dawn L. Griffin-Smith
· · · · · · · · Licensed Court Reporter
20· · · ·Certificate #108 (RSA 310-A:161-181)
· · · · My Commission expires:· 1/22/25
21
22
23
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
183
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
Exhibits
11282993 BR
IGITTE.
CODLING.
EXHIBIT1
4:14 60:6
61:9
11282993 BR
IGITTE.
CODLING.
EXHIBIT2
4:16 5:3
68:19
69:1
96:17,18
11282993 BR
IGITTE.
CODLING.
EXHIBIT3
4:17 75:7
11282993 BR
IGITTE.
CODLING.
EXHIBIT4
4:19
122:1,4
11282993 BR
IGITTE.
CODLING.
EXHIBIT5
4:20
130:19
11282993 BR
IGITTE.
CODLING.
EXHIBIT6
4:15,21
146:22
11282993 BR
IGITTE.
CODLING.
EXHIBIT7
4:22
153:18
11282993 BR
IGITTE.
CODLING.
EXHIBIT8
4:23
155:6
11282993 BR
IGITTE.
CODLING.
EXHIBIT9
5:3 165:6
11282993 BR
IGITTE.
CODLING.
EXHIBIT10
5:4
172:13
174:17,18
11282993 BR
IGITTE.
CODLING.
EXHIBIT11
5:5
174:10,19
175:12
1
60:6 61:9
1/13/23
122:1
1/27/22
146:22
1/31/22
153:18
1/6/23
165:6
1/9/22
68:19
10
172:13
174:17,18
100
84:16
10:29
166:2
10th
75:13
174:2
175:1
11
88:2
174:10,19
175:12
11:36
88:3
11th
75:12,22
88:12
89:23
90:12
92:5,18
95:18
12th
72:19
113:8
13
122:8,14
13th
124:21
14
116:14
169:6
171:17
14th
175:2,15
176:15
177:20
179:11
15
169:6
16
81:21
17
123:3
17th
74:18
75:4
1800s
35:10
2
2
20:22
68:19
69:1
96:17,18
131:2
2/2/22
155:6
20
11:5,12,
13
2000-
76:19
141:13
2014
10:18
2019
11:1,2
12:6
69:15
2020
11:23
12:9,18
13:2
35:9,13
57:1
61:13,22
63:5 77:1
2021
90:3,6,12
101:6
2022
32:15,19
35:9,13
43:19
44:11
45:2,10
69:4
70:17
71:19
75:12,13
76:20
77:23
87:16
100:11
102:11
116:15,17
129:4
141:11,
14,17
143:3
146:1
147:3,17
150:1
154:18
155:12
165:15
166:2,17
168:2
170:21
2023
58:13,15
75:22
76:19
88:2,12
90:13
100:1
108:16
109:1,9
112:5
113:9
122:9,14
123:3
124:21
126:15
127:6
128:9
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: 1..2023
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
141:4
146:1
171:17,22
2024
10:21
22
141:9,15
23
128:11
23rd
11:1
24
10:18,19
27
48:12
77:12
78:2
79:16
80:22
84:5
87:15
101:5
109:19,20
110:5,8
111:8,12,
16,23
114:23
115:12
140:17
141:3,6
147:17
151:4,8,
11,20
152:18
166:7
167:2
27th
147:2
150:1
153:2
28
48:12
77:12
78:2
79:16
80:22
84:22
87:15
101:5
109:19,20
110:5,8
111:8,13,
16,23
114:23
115:12
140:18
141:3,6
151:5,20
166:7
167:2
2:28
75:23
2:56
181:20
2nd
155:12
162:3
3
3
58:14
75:7
87:23
3/6/20
60:6
31
121:20
153:17
31st
154:17
35
154:4
171:15
37
18:5,6
38:4
3rd
11:2
4
4
122:1,4
175:11
4th
81:14
148:2
5
5
130:19
175:11
5/15/24
75:7
54
130:17
5:00
174:5
5:34
122:15
5th
165:15
166:2,17
170:21
6
6
146:22
175:12
6th
61:12
7
7
153:18
7/12/23
130:19
8
8
155:6
8th
10:17,21
9
9
165:6
91-A
120:15
137:11
99
53:16
9th
69:4
92:16
93:21
96:14
97:3
145:17
146:11,14
174:1,5
175:1
A
a.m.
88:3
166:2
ability
27:5 45:6
117:1
138:20
abnormal
106:2
absolutely
87:19
98:12
126:3
164:3
165:4
accomplishe
d
93:18
96:12
accuracy
167:3
accurate
36:7
47:11
50:13
72:10
116:17
171:18,21
177:11
achieve
179:8
acquired
126:14,16
act
36:11
111:4
112:2
acting
44:7
109:10
action
47:18
49:2,3
88:18
89:21
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: 2024..action
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
119:11
120:1
126:2,18
172:18
180:6
actions
19:16
49:8
102:10
139:1,2,
10,21
172:6
actively
92:8
activities
18:14,23
19:14,21
24:6 27:7
36:14
133:14
activity
33:20,22
36:4
37:18
56:6
actual
66:1
71:15
153:13
159:3
170:16
acutely
24:18
127:7
add
43:12
60:12
172:15
added
105:15,23
106:9
adding
154:9
addition
8:15
15:14,20
42:20
59:9 66:1
89:2
98:15
150:19
152:12
162:16
163:7
168:3
additional
12:14
59:16
84:7,11
151:3
152:10
162:20
163:5
166:23
address
51:11
94:1
98:17
134:16
addressed
122:15,19
152:5
addressing
109:13
administrat
ion
14:23
15:16
22:3 23:8
32:2,13,
16 36:5
56:11
82:13
97:10
99:17
127:16
168:16,17
administrat
or
10:14
25:20,22
79:7
admonish
157:19
160:2,13
admonishing
144:13
advance
124:5,9,
13
advice
117:13
118:9,13
119:3,10
advisory
83:20,22
84:1
169:4,6
affect
121:3
affidavit
116:13
148:17
149:2
171:15
affirmation
8:11
AG's
122:20
Agency
11:4,13
agree
41:1
agreed
55:5
66:22
67:13
72:8
112:11,23
agreed-upon
58:16
agreement
57:18
59:5,10,
11,18
65:22
66:1,4,8
105:4
112:10,23
113:2
ahead
59:1 78:6
117:16
147:21
170:6
172:1
allegation
105:19
allegations
31:8
allege
172:7
alleged
76:16
allegedly
28:16
alleging
29:11,17,
22 30:1
allowed
9:22
allowing
160:10
alternate
152:10
amount
56:3
110:18
164:2
amounts
110:10
111:13
analysis
13:23
and/or
16:9 17:7
129:9
158:20
annual
22:20
79:23
87:11
102:23
106:19
111:10
140:20
141:12
156:12
anomalies
152:14
anomaly
152:7
answerable
18:8
answers
8:8 14:13
anticipate
7:19 8:1
24:6
anticipatin
g
30:21
anxiety
172:6
anymore
138:14
139:17
anytime
63:22
apologies
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: actions..apologies
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
165:8
apparently
69:18
appeal
114:21
115:4
appeals
114:19
appears
43:19
62:6 69:7
122:18
166:13
applied
85:3,4
161:23
appraised
158:17,18
appropriati
on
63:11
approval
26:2,11
68:1
158:23
159:17
approved
54:16
68:3
85:19
approves
22:22
approximate
ly
140:23
April
10:17,21
11:1,2
81:14
148:2
architectur
al
11:18
areas
15:23
16:2,18
17:1
21:19
63:13
argument
124:10,
13,14
arise
166:9
arrangement
39:3
article
77:12
78:2
83:11
84:5,22
85:6,13
101:5
108:14
110:5
111:12
114:23
141:3,6
142:18
150:10
151:4,8,
11
152:17,18
articles
48:12
78:14
79:15
80:1,22
81:10
82:5,8
85:3,4,
19,21
86:4
87:1,11,
15
109:19,20
110:8
111:8,12,
16,23
112:2
115:12
140:17,19
141:11,23
142:2,6,
9,10,21
143:3,6
148:5
150:20
151:4,19
152:13,21
155:2,20
157:17,18
160:2,20
161:16
163:6
166:7
167:1,2
articulate
56:20
asks
83:16
160:1
aspects
158:13
assessment
31:7,11,
15 53:3
63:10
97:7
146:2
159:8
assign
94:18
assigned
37:1
39:9,19
42:8 49:6
50:22
61:22
83:3
assignment
50:19
117:3
assist
21:22
31:5
48:10
assistant
32:17
92:3
118:1,6,
10,14,16
150:9
166:18
association
12:23
21:4
137:4
140:2,14
assume
152:21,22
assumption
56:1
assured
131:7
attached
130:15
152:21
157:17
166:21
171:15
attachment
154:11
attempted
45:13
attempting
114:21
135:12
attempts
157:19
attend
93:11,12
99:9
attendance
106:21
attended
62:8
attention
28:2
attested
116:14
attorney
7:8 9:10,
13 13:17,
21 37:21
60:20
75:14
93:9 97:5
98:22
106:7
108:23
117:5
118:21
119:14,16
122:21,22
124:22
125:21
130:22
131:4,14,
21 132:7
172:20
177:18
179:15
attorneys
9:11 14:6
32:10
38:5 64:9
69:12,14
97:3
98:19
99:7
109:2,8
123:15
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: apparently..attorneys
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
136:15
audible
8:14
authority
18:2 27:4
32:21
33:16
34:5,6,15
36:13,19
39:13,21
40:8,20
41:3,12
44:1
45:6,14,
17 46:2,
6,20,22
47:3
50:20,23
51:18
64:19
65:7,10
67:4 68:4
105:1
133:1
159:21
authorize
26:12
authorized
46:20
54:17
55:6
avenue
143:11
awarded
12:8
aware
24:17,19
29:10,17,
22 72:19
85:8
127:7
128:22
146:5
177:4
awful
144:6
awkward
181:1
B
bachelor's
11:17
back
11:16
17:22
25:20,21
26:8,14
32:6,14,
19 35:9,
10 38:9
40:12
43:4 47:2
60:9
61:7,22
63:5
72:22
78:20
80:17
83:16
87:17
88:12
98:7
100:10
105:9
107:11
108:1,13,
15 109:9
112:14
115:17
116:4,6
117:21
118:7
119:6
125:12
127:14
134:7
136:2
139:12
142:7
144:11
151:15
153:2
156:17
159:5
162:9,14
164:10
165:9
167:13
168:2,13
169:13,19
170:21
171:3,11,
14 173:23
179:17
180:1
backdrop
162:11
background
163:2,14
balances
24:16
25:9
ball
65:1
ballot
111:10
141:12
barely
61:15
based
14:20
32:18
37:23
50:18
52:6
83:21
100:14
113:14
basically
45:17
71:11
74:7
176:5
177:10
basis
20:2
22:20
42:7
112:1
137:2
bearing
102:10
103:9
106:16
began
56:21
begin
9:21
beginning
73:13
89:15
93:2
108:15
146:1
begins
76:1 88:4
behalf
27:18
29:19
31:1,16,
19 32:8
52:19
53:12,20
66:3
102:22
113:23
115:5
123:18
134:1
135:7
136:9
139:7
150:11
158:6
belief
86:7
179:12
believed
45:3
70:18
73:19
111:21
112:1,3
134:15
benefit
54:11
133:17,
19,21
135:8,9,
11 149:14
bias
107:1,2
biased
103:6
bid
20:22
22:16
bidding
21:2,3
big
127:17
biggest
67:16
bill
49:18,20,
21,22
51:10
111:4
132:20
billing
26:10
bind
84:4
89:14
binders
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: audible..binders
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
128:4,5,
19
binding
83:20,22
binds
83:23
bit
45:5
101:18
132:21
170:15
biweekly
20:10
Bjelobrk
87:4
156:9
black-and-
white
174:16
board
17:6,7,11
18:13
19:14,19
20:3,7,11
22:20,21
23:3
26:1,11,
15 27:4,
14,19
28:2,5
29:12,20
30:13
31:4
32:20
33:1,15,
18,20
34:7
36:3,12
37:1,8,19
38:5,7,14
39:3,8,
12,20
40:4,18
41:11
42:2,8,11
43:8,19,
22 44:6,
13,14,19
45:1,2,
10,12,15,
23 46:4,
14,19
47:2,18
49:2,3,6,
11 50:3,
22 52:1
55:12
56:1,5
61:21
62:8,15,
16,23
64:18
65:6,9
66:7,23
67:5
68:1,11,
18 69:2
72:18,23
73:2,8,
14,16
74:8,11,
20,22
75:1,5
76:5
78:13,16,
22 79:1,
3,6,14
80:13
81:2
86:8,9,
13,14,17,
18,20,22
88:8,14,
17,18,20
89:5,13,
14,17,19,
21 90:10,
19 91:2,
7,14,19
94:1,17
96:22
97:8,23
98:10,16
99:10
100:1,10,
15,22
101:6,10,
22 102:11
103:6,12
104:22
105:6
106:17,23
107:16
109:9
114:18
115:5
116:20
117:9
118:8,13
119:1,6,
8,18,20
120:3,13,
21 125:5
126:1,8,
11,18,21
127:6,10,
14
128:13,
15,17,20
129:4,7
130:1,10
131:8
132:12
134:5,14,
15 138:6
146:13
156:2,7,
10 157:9
158:16,
20,21
159:9,12,
14,21
163:18,19
164:20
165:22
166:3
176:11,
17,21,22
177:14,21
178:12
179:12
board's
90:4
96:10
146:1
158:23
178:14
boards
101:6
Bob
156:3
160:6
body
17:11
123:2
Boldt
97:19
98:23
99:8
bookkeeper
25:17,19,
21
bottom
69:11
75:20
76:10
94:13
131:2,3
157:15
158:1
165:20
174:2
177:6
Boucher
41:21
69:9
84:14
85:2 92:2
97:2
99:17
100:12
117:18
118:4,12,
19 124:21
128:2
151:9
158:16
176:16
boundaries
16:16
box
26:16
boxes
127:17,18
128:3
132:19
break
10:5 60:4
61:8
115:23
171:7,13
Briana
122:22
Brigitte
6:2 7:2
45:17
131:9
132:13
166:4
bring
21:6
28:1,5
67:7
broader
63:13
broke
116:6
brought
43:9
47:11
65:14
76:15
77:7
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: binding..brought
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
110:20
112:8
125:18
134:5,15
156:9
176:17
budget
22:22
23:3,4
25:15,16
68:2
169:4,6,
8,9
buggy
162:14
building
22:15
24:4
buildings
20:18
21:8
business
102:5
164:16
166:8
169:11
busy
164:1,10
169:11,12
180:18
Butterfield
118:21
131:5,14,
21 132:7
C
C-O-D-L-I-
N-G
7:2
calendar
93:5
call
125:19
166:20
169:1
179:14
called
132:10
141:18
calls
143:12,
19,20,22
167:5,7
capacity
14:12,22
30:13
34:4
103:19
caption
62:10
154:7
care
21:8
career
12:17
careful
136:18
137:5,6
carried
19:13
23:11
124:1
carry
59:17
case
37:15
65:17
66:21,22
94:18
147:23
152:14
166:9
cases
24:13
94:18
categorizat
ion
72:2
category
52:11
caused
133:22
144:6
151:8,9,
20 172:7
CC'D
122:16
165:21
center
174:1
Central
16:1
certainty
101:21
certificati
on
12:19
certificati
ons
13:11,13
certified
13:12
chain
75:11
122:12
131:2
175:6
180:20
chair
43:6
45:15
66:5 73:2
76:7,8
79:4 87:3
125:23
chairman
66:7 76:5
chance
68:21
75:13
122:3
130:21
153:22
154:14
155:9,14
165:17
172:22
173:5
change
10:19
134:2
138:1
changed
10:19
36:21
137:8,16
138:6
143:23
144:1
Chapter
18:6
characteriz
e
129:10
145:9
check
25:22,23
26:1,3
31:22
87:17,18
91:10
checked
26:16
checking
24:19
125:14
checks
24:15
25:9
27:5,6,11
32:11
Chris
30:10
51:14,20
53:19,23
74:20
97:19
99:6,7
108:16,
18,22
109:2,5,6
110:2
112:5
113:17,22
114:7
115:10
122:16,21
123:12
125:20
131:4
132:4,10
139:5
Christine
93:13
135:2
144:23
175:22
Christmas
12:3
Christopher
98:22
104:6
122:7
176:18
179:16,17
chronologic
al
128:4,5
chronology
11:16
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: budget..chronology
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
Ciandella
28:17,22
Cinde
125:19
179:14
cited
97:5
clarity
132:15
clean
10:8
clear
9:4,8
70:13
97:5
109:5,6
124:17
126:20
129:14
160:7
162:2
176:13
179:6
180:22
cleared
96:7
clerk
80:2,10
82:6,9
111:9
127:22
150:10
client
81:19,23
closed
113:3,9
closely
123:17
151:23
closing
148:19
CMS
11:8
coauthored
74:19
code
25:15
coded
25:11
codes
26:6
Codling
6:2 7:2,3
60:17
116:6
171:13
181:14
collection
63:15
Collectivel
y
158:4
College
11:17
color
172:21
comments
107:23
commissione
rs
103:14
committee
169:4,7
common
16:3
common-name
15:23
communicate
98:9
123:13
138:10
139:6,13
140:7
143:9
158:11
180:21
communicate
d
74:16,23
78:12
143:5,8
communicati
ng
74:12
77:4
142:8
176:22
communicati
on
143:1,2
communicati
ons
56:6
79:1,10
81:1,7
82:3
85:20
86:10
102:10
123:15
131:20
132:7
133:7
136:18,22
144:1
163:20
164:7
communities
136:23
company
23:8
107:9
139:3
Compared
167:5
compile
82:14
complaint
28:14
47:13
48:21
complete
127:11
completed
24:22
completing
12:13
component
67:16
76:23
composition
130:10
comprised
94:8
computer
150:13
conceding
180:12
concerned
96:20
concluded
112:16
conditional
ly
116:15
conduct
82:17
149:7
conducted
90:1
confer
63:22
conference
93:15,16,
19
conferred
12:8
39:11
confidence
98:23
confines
161:1
confirmatio
n
93:20
conflict
31:22
32:5,11
33:9,11
37:21
40:21
51:15
69:17,19
70:8,16,
21,22
71:1,2,4,
8,10,11,
12,18
72:10,12,
13,14
91:9,10
96:1,7
108:17,
19,22
109:4
115:8,9
176:23
179:20,21
conflicts
13:23
37:10
41:14
44:2,15
45:7
46:16
47:4
70:13
97:6
109:6
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: Ciandella..conflicts
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
117:2
176:13,14
confusion
29:1
connected
48:12,13,
14 52:9
55:13
77:9
109:19
110:1
115:16
connectin
124:16
connection
9:20 14:6
20:15
28:15
29:7 30:4
31:1
36:14
39:22
53:18
57:23
65:15
66:12,18
71:19
73:18
75:2 77:6
101:23
102:3,9
109:11
112:6
114:1,6,
14 116:9
117:6
121:10
124:2,17,
18 125:3,
6 136:8
140:1
141:2
163:8
173:14
connections
115:11
considerati
on
8:3
considered
130:3
consistent
62:21
65:4
constituted
44:19
45:11
90:10
100:2
contact
44:9 46:7
86:23
178:13
contacted
141:18
contents
149:4
contested
149:14
context
56:4
132:17
168:7
170:9
176:8
continue
37:20
96:3
134:6
continued
70:14
174:10
continues
181:16
continuing
13:6,7,
14,16
126:3
contract
11:8 21:4
27:17
37:20
117:5
118:11
172:18
contracting
21:3
22:17
contractor
23:8
contractors
20:17
27:13
contracts
18:20
20:15
35:16,22
37:10
40:20
41:13
44:1,15
45:7
46:16
47:4
117:2
contradicto
ry
149:19
control
77:10
88:23
104:17
conversatio
n
8:10 87:5
125:7,11
126:5
128:12
131:18
143:15
153:3
157:5
conversatio
ns
7:21
78:23
79:10
80:12
128:17
129:17
131:19,20
132:6
138:12
153:7
157:2,8
convey
38:15
conveyed
90:19
conveying
34:6
coordinate
22:19
copies
154:5
173:20
174:16
copy
127:11,13
166:12
170:23
cordial
138:12
core
165:16
corner
15:12
154:4
correct
10:18
13:18
14:7 15:6
19:8
21:13
28:17
29:13,22
30:20
31:20
34:8
37:12
39:13,18,
22 40:9
43:13
47:5,9
52:11
53:4
54:3,12
57:19
58:17
59:14
65:12
67:22
68:6
69:4,9,10
70:5
76:6,20
77:8,18,
19 78:4
79:11
81:4 82:7
83:5
85:15
87:16
90:15,23
96:4
98:11
106:9
111:10,
14,18
112:17,20
113:10
114:10
115:17
122:5
134:5,8,
11 141:5,
15,19
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: confusion..correct
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
150:13
152:20
154:15,19
155:12
165:23
corrected
146:11
corrections
25:21
correctly
83:19
94:4
146:15
166:10
correlate
132:20
Councilor
133:8
counsel
60:13
119:9,22
counterpart
158:15
counting
131:1
County
94:9
couple
40:13
courses
12:15,16,
21 13:3,
5,14
coursework
12:5
court
6:3 29:6,
7 30:5
36:1
47:14
57:14,22
58:10
59:4,8
65:1
112:15
113:4,8
Court's
81:14
148:2
cover
7:10
131:1
154:21
covered
64:21
65:16
coversheet
60:19
create
109:4
149:18
credibility
81:23
148:10,
14,22
149:8
credibility
's
149:11
credible
149:2
credits
13:15,16
crew
170:13
crisis
88:7
current
49:10
50:5
130:10
custody
104:17
cut
27:11
cutting
27:5,6
D
D-O-W
147:8
daily
137:2
damage
138:17
143:21
damaged
172:5
Darwin
61:17
date
10:20
36:23
37:5
65:10
113:6
146:17,19
156:17
176:20
dated
75:22
122:8
154:17
155:11
dates
173:23
day
125:15
138:22
164:1,3,
10 166:8,
17
day-to-day
18:18
19:14
36:4
164:16
days
96:9
162:14
deadline
87:7,10
140:18,23
141:2
142:12
deal
133:22
137:1
152:6
dealing
155:22
dealt
162:10
December
12:2
92:11
93:2
145:15
169:10
decide
66:21
72:23
decided
68:12
deciding
94:17
decision
27:13
67:1,18,
20 68:8,
15 89:20
97:9
100:2
129:23
149:13
152:9,12,
18,23
153:8,10,
15
decision-
making
44:9 46:7
decisions
19:16
42:10
49:8
50:20
61:23
116:22
declaratory
28:14
defect
92:15,21
93:20,23
145:18
146:6,7
defendant's
81:16
definitive
43:17
degree
11:17,19,
22 12:4,8
delay
92:13
93:22
94:16,23
145:9,21
146:2
delaying
76:18
delegate
40:6,19
41:2
delegated
33:19
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: corrected..delegated
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
36:4
37:2,18
39:9,19
41:12
42:8 49:7
61:22
64:19
65:6
117:17,18
delegating
46:22
116:21
delegation
50:3
117:9
delivered
23:12
24:9,15
25:13
deliveries
24:2
delivering
96:13
department
21:10
22:11
23:14,18
24:10,13,
18 25:11
26:8,20
56:10
85:2
122:20
123:4
157:18
departments
16:4,7,9
21:5
depending
151:7
depends
82:22
deposed
6:4
deposition
7:3 61:9
116:8
122:5
140:16
148:3
150:7
154:14
181:14,19
derogatory
106:22
107:6,7,
15,22
108:6
description
26:4
desire
159:10
desk
127:22
detail
132:21
178:6,7
determinati
on
148:23
determine
20:21
92:19
difference
178:10
differently
138:8,9,
10
diligence
91:11
diploma
12:12
direct
15:5 41:8
129:17
168:14
169:16
directed
159:13,14
168:23
direction
8:22
directly
21:10
23:16
24:8
48:12,13,
14 73:23
74:15
92:2
104:21
109:18,20
114:11
115:16
135:15
director
147:11,12
disagree
81:18
97:22
disallow
157:16
159:20
160:1,19
disallowanc
e
86:14
disallowed
86:6
disallowing
157:18
161:16
disclosing
71:20
72:3
disclosure
71:15,20
discovered
126:11
128:14
discovery
181:16
discuss
83:17
92:23
120:17
156:10
181:1
discussed
42:4,5
95:2,7
130:12
discussing
95:22
discussion
38:11
69:12
95:11,20
125:2
139:17
157:11
180:2
discussions
78:21
79:13
81:1
86:13,15,
16,21
178:5
displeasure
101:5
dispute
64:2,8,
14,21
67:7,14
distinct
15:19
distinction
s
15:15
distributio
n
63:11,15,
19
district
16:16
30:12
33:17
34:16,17,
19 35:4,5
36:7
39:17
46:3,9
47:8
51:20
53:21
54:1,12,
22,23
57:12
59:13
69:22
70:4,7,9,
10,11,19
72:4,5,15
101:8
102:1,4,
5,6,15,
20,21,22
103:8,13,
20
106:12,20
112:3
113:20
114:4,9,
14,20
115:1
124:6
160:10
district's
48:17
109:22
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: delegating..district's
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
District/
village
106:12
districts
15:8,10,
14,20,21
16:2,10,
11 17:15
94:9
121:6
157:20
160:2,14,
21,23
161:1,3
162:12
163:3
docket
113:1,2
document
60:18
61:8,10
65:20
68:22
71:18
75:10,11,
21 86:8
87:23
104:1,4,
7,18
105:1,3,
10,18
106:3,5
113:3,7
121:19
122:4
130:15,22
147:1
154:15
documented
38:11
documents
29:6,8
30:4 36:1
54:23
57:22
65:19,21
66:11
68:8,15
100:14,
17,19,20,
21 101:13
102:15
103:7,18
104:5,9,
13 106:4,
8 126:15,
16,19
127:7,13
128:14,22
133:4
134:13
136:3
163:2
170:3
173:15
dollar
110:9,18
dollars
63:12
110:9,16
Donahue
28:16,21
double
120:11
doubts
133:9
Dow
139:16
147:8,10
150:2
DRA
30:5 31:1
35:23
36:15
56:11,13,
19,21
57:3,23
73:10,18
75:3
76:18
77:5
78:1,8
79:20
81:10,19,
22 82:7,
14,17
83:4,16
84:6
85:5,12,
17,20
86:10,23
88:15,21
89:4
90:21
91:4
92:4,6,9,
23 93:14
98:15
99:1
109:12
112:6
114:1,6,
9,15
121:2,10
122:14
123:4,8,
12,20
124:18
133:8
134:4,10,
17 135:1,
15
136:10,14
139:5
140:17
141:19
142:9
143:2,5,
8,19,22
144:17
145:10,11
147:14,
15,16,19
148:7
150:2,3,
13,17,20
151:7,10,
21,23
152:5
153:1
154:18
155:3,12,
17,18
158:11,14
159:11,
14,18
160:1,13,
19,20
162:3,5,
18 163:6,
7,20
166:6,19
167:1,4,
10,15,23
168:18,23
169:1,14
176:5
DRA's
83:7
146:3
153:4
162:10
draft
133:6
180:5
drafted
104:3
drafting
155:15
dragged
76:19
driver's
88:22
Drummond
32:3
69:12,18
70:9,17
71:3,19
72:16,20
92:4,5,8,
17 93:13
94:15
95:23
96:11,12,
20,21,23
97:6
121:8,16
123:9,15,
17 124:1,
4,9,12
126:3,15,
19,23
134:1
135:14,
19,20
136:15
155:19
156:4
158:13
159:8
175:21,22
176:3
DTC
28:22
29:2,10,
17 30:3,
6,15 32:7
47:11
48:9
49:20,22
51:8,23
52:18,20
53:11
54:2,8,
17,23
55:6,11
56:2
68:17
73:9,17
74:3,13,
21 75:2
97:3,5,
10,11,19,
21 98:2,
11,17,18,
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: District/village..DTC
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
19 99:7
100:3
104:6
105:3,6
108:17,21
109:1,2,
7,11,12
113:17
123:9
124:22
125:2,5
126:2
127:1,6,
11,12
128:14
129:8,11,
20 130:9
132:8,23
133:6,9,
18
134:15,
20,22
135:5,17,
20 136:3,
5,7,10
138:2,5
143:19
144:8,11,
17 145:5
171:3
176:22
177:7,14,
22
178:13,15
179:13
180:5,7,
22
DTC's
131:15,21
139:21
144:15
172:6
due
77:11,12
91:10
duly
6:3
duplicative
135:13
duty
161:20
E
earlier
57:1 65:5
109:20
140:16
150:7
174:14
earliest
87:5
early
77:1
99:11,21
128:11
168:2
East
16:1
edited
74:19
education
11:15
12:13
13:3,7,
14,16
education-
type
13:6
effectively
154:6
elaborate
144:4
elections
44:21
elsewise
140:13
email
74:16
75:7,21,
23 76:4
86:3
88:1,3
89:11,15
91:6
97:19
98:22
122:1,7,
11,12
123:22
124:22
125:4
130:15,19
131:4
132:10
143:2
146:22
147:2,5,
18 150:1
151:3,10,
20
152:12,19
153:1,9,
11,17,18
154:17,22
155:2,6,
11,14,15,
17,18
156:8,13
157:14
158:22
159:1,11,
12,13,18,
19 160:18
162:3
164:4
165:6,10,
14,15,16,
21 166:4,
14,19
167:4,9
168:2,4
169:13
170:20
175:6
179:17,18
180:5
emailed
78:1
141:18
emails
75:11
86:4
131:3,19
133:7
135:22
143:12,17
162:4,6,
17,20,21
163:5
164:17
166:5,22,
23
167:10,
11,14
171:1
emergency
69:2
174:4
employed
10:22
54:2
108:18,23
employee
54:22
83:7,9
117:21
employees
69:6
employer
107:8,9
employment
10:11
18:22
117:7,8,
12 119:3
employment-
related
19:7
encompassed
63:12
end
10:8 12:6
58:7 59:6
71:2
90:9,12
92:10
110:4
126:5
145:15,23
152:3
164:2
166:7
169:9
ended
112:14
145:5
engage
20:16
21:6
27:18
32:10,21
33:22
engaged
33:11
119:16
engagement
31:23
103:10
104:2
105:7,16
179:19
engaging
27:12
32:1 33:9
enormous
164:1
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: Dtc's..enormous
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
enter
82:18
83:10
entered
25:18
150:12
entering
82:19
152:13
entire
17:8,12,
13 31:22
89:14
158:7
entities
94:11
136:17
138:21
entity
103:3
entry
55:17,19
56:7
erasing
47:3
Eric
122:15
179:17,23
essentially
60:19
established
27:16
36:1
estate
64:17
evaluation
55:18
56:2
84:21
event
7:6 8:16
37:8
events
15:4
43:20
44:11
eventually
144:4
everybody's
103:22
evidence
102:8
104:18,21
127:8
149:19
exact
37:5
45:16
107:14
108:4
153:7
examination
6:6 149:7
examples
103:5
exchange
174:7
exchanged
67:17
excluding
99:14,20
100:11
exclusively
65:3
execute
23:6
executed
59:5
executing
18:20
57:16
execution
21:4
22:18
exhibit
60:6 61:9
68:19
69:1 75:7
81:21
96:17,18
121:20,23
122:1,4
130:16,19
146:22
153:18,20
154:13
155:6,8
165:6
172:13
174:10,
17,18,19
175:12
exhibits
97:20
exist
71:16
124:7
existed
45:1
expect
7:19
21:11
24:6
expected
21:16,18
expecting
30:21
experience
15:5
124:8
expert
13:22
14:4,5,10
21:12,16
expertise
21:19
explain
17:5
42:16
89:13
91:13,19
132:21
137:7
138:7
168:9
173:6
explained
42:21
115:2
124:23
132:19
139:22
166:14
176:2,3
explaining
176:8
explanation
38:14
73:4
74:2,5,8
99:19
167:7
explicit
47:6
86:11
95:19
explicitly
40:15
89:18
126:20
137:20,22
express
46:5
expressed
96:19
159:10
expressing
158:6
extinguish
47:1
extinguishi
ng
47:3
F
face
53:9
76:11
77:3
127:4
fact
7:6 15:4
31:15
51:10
67:3
97:19
98:6
100:22
101:6
109:2
138:4
161:9
162:6
facts
33:4
81:21
149:2
factual
84:19
149:17,18
failed
45:21
112:13
fair
18:22
19:13
35:18
39:1
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: enter..fair
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
71:14,17
83:8
133:13,15
153:5
178:16
fairly
81:8
87:19
fall
50:5,6
52:11
69:15
falls
63:20
familiar
18:1
familiarity
17:17
family
102:7
fault
77:10,17
81:20
favor
148:20
February
58:10,12,
15 90:6
141:1,4,
17 142:13
143:2
155:12
162:3
169:10
feed
168:12
feel
72:6 84:3
154:8
180:23
feelings
96:10
129:5
Feels
87:22
fees
131:8,9,
16 132:13
fell
118:1
felt
28:2,3
52:2
field
139:17
147:10
162:2
file
59:7
63:23
114:18
127:11
filed
29:6 30:4
36:1
47:14
48:15
49:20
51:10
57:22
58:4,9
59:4 77:6
94:11
113:4,6,7
115:4
142:11
143:4
148:5
filing
52:2 64:1
115:3
140:18
142:12,17
Fillmore
93:13
final
22:22
26:1,11
27:4
42:14
67:4
105:7
112:11
177:5
finalizatio
n
57:8
finalized
57:19
59:23
112:18
finally
12:4
26:10
59:4
145:10,13
finance
12:20,23
13:9,12
financial
25:20,22
financially
151:22
152:1
financing
24:16
find
51:4 80:1
83:20
108:13,14
126:14
fine
29:3
fingers
7:17
finished
12:4,5
58:11
fire
16:7
30:12
33:17
34:16,17
35:4
39:17
46:3,9
47:8
51:19
53:21
57:11
100:13,
16,23
101:7,9,
11 102:4,
5,6,14,
20,22
103:12
106:11
109:21
110:15
112:3
113:19,20
114:20
115:1
119:23
124:6
151:15
firing
18:19
19:4
firm
29:2 32:3
54:2
92:4,9
94:18
95:6,21
96:23
98:14
100:3
108:17,21
117:6,12
119:16
firms
14:6
95:8,20
first-time
7:6
fit
52:11
56:15
flowchart
117:22
focused
118:9
follow
91:22
170:21
177:10
follow-up
52:6
foremost
8:9
forever
87:22
forewarned
78:2
form
6:19,20
13:19
14:2,8,14
16:19
17:3,9,23
18:10,17
19:1,9,17
21:14
23:20
24:11
25:6
26:15,18
27:9,22
28:7,19
29:14,23
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: fairly..form
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
30:8,17,
21 31:3,
10 32:9,
22 33:23
34:9
35:19
36:16
37:13
38:2,19
39:4,14,
23 40:10
41:4,17
42:18
43:3,14
44:4,17
45:8
47:16,22
48:23
49:15
50:8,14
52:12,22
53:14
54:4,13,
20 55:15,
22 56:18
57:5
58:2,23
59:20
60:15
67:9,21
68:10
73:11
78:5,18
83:2 96:5
99:4,22
109:16
110:12,22
111:19
113:5,11
117:15
118:2,8,
23 119:7,
19 120:8,
22 130:5
132:1
134:18
141:20
161:6
163:10
165:1
171:23
177:2
178:17
formal
11:15
12:13
13:3
15:10
16:2
36:11
89:21
120:1
150:19
166:20
formally
79:16,20,
22 80:11
82:5
140:9
150:18
157:16
158:2
159:20
format
8:20
forward
65:10
82:1
98:11
166:5
167:11
170:23
found
126:10
128:8
136:3
four-page
130:22
fourth
122:22
174:22
175:5
frame
12:12
35:10
145:14
169:5,19
Fred
66:5,6
87:3
125:13
129:3
156:9,11,
14,21
159:7
181:9
frequently
125:14
front
81:19
87:23
127:22
147:1
frustrated
126:8
frustration
125:17
full
6:11,23
7:14 8:4
33:16
46:2,6
51:18
89:8
178:20
fully
9:21 91:7
152:10
function
34:13
funding
22:20
48:17
77:13
101:8
109:21
110:15
113:20
115:20
155:21
funds
26:13,17
furnace
22:5
future
116:16
157:19
G
G-E-R-R-Y
147:6
Garofalo
66:5,6
87:4
125:1,4
129:3
156:9,11
Garofalo's
129:7
gathered
100:16
gathering
170:3
gave
37:1
43:20
44:12
45:18
75:10
78:1
104:23
165:8
gears
115:22
general
18:6,12
20:19
24:5,9
34:11
43:2
64:23
85:14
105:10
108:9
131:10
142:10,16
147:23
149:8,11
156:5
162:1
167:8
169:12
generally
18:14,22
20:14
23:16
27:20
29:10,21
35:16
62:16
77:22
117:21
generate
71:3
generated
104:3
Gerry
86:4
147:6,7,
8,10
150:2
155:12
gist
126:7
Giuda
155:23
156:3
160:6
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: formal..Giuda
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
give
7:14 8:4,
13,21
9:21
20:3,10,
19 34:8
40:5
41:23
73:4 74:2
117:13
121:19
giving
8:8 9:23
14:11,20,
22 15:2
34:6 46:2
74:5
gloves
170:14
goal
100:13,23
good
17:20
25:13
35:12
61:1 62:8
72:2
99:1,7
101:3,18
115:23
138:22,23
165:19
166:4
173:2
174:12
goodness
84:16
Gotcha
147:17
govern
149:13
governance
17:8,23
22:2 23:9
governing
17:11
government
10:19
12:20,22
13:9,12
14:23
15:15,18
17:4
18:8,17
26:15
77:21
83:2
118:2,8
119:1,7,
19 120:22
governors
11:19
12:22
Grafton
94:9
Graham
173:9
174:3
175:7,8
grant
94:2
146:7
great
93:10
133:22
gross
51:15
179:22
ground
7:7
Group
118:20
131:5
136:14
guarantee
43:16
guarded
136:18
137:5,6
138:15
139:15
140:9
guess
72:2
105:19
106:13
151:17
153:10
160:17
guidance
18:2
142:17
144:23
guys
75:17
146:20
165:17
H
habit
8:12
hairs
173:10
half
59:18
135:10
166:16
halfway
88:1
hall
102:16
143:7
hallway
127:19
Hampshire
10:13
11:1 13:1
14:7
15:1,17
18:4
56:10
83:1
122:14,19
137:3
140:1,4,
13 157:20
160:3
161:3,14,
15
handed
34:14
61:8
handled
144:14
handling
36:4
116:22
139:8
hands
24:8
165:13
handwritten
154:4
happen
92:16,20
93:21
103:14
124:7
150:22,23
151:1
177:17
happened
20:1
115:7
142:21
148:4
167:19
169:4,9
happening
135:14
168:7
harm
133:22
135:9
136:11,13
139:3,11
144:6
harmed
139:20
140:3,12
Hatch
87:4
Haverhill
10:13,23
15:1,9,
12,16,22
16:1,5,22
17:1,2,4,
8 18:3,9,
16 19:12
20:16
23:9
30:12
33:16,19
35:14
47:10
48:15
53:12,20
54:10,16
56:14,23
58:15,21
59:12,17
60:6 64:8
66:4
68:17,19
76:16
77:8
80:23
91:11
100:5
103:2,11,
21 104:9,
20 105:20
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: give..Haverhill
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
106:15,
18,22
107:3
108:10
110:11,
15,16,21
112:8
113:18,
21,23
116:11,16
121:3,4,7
124:2,12
135:7
138:5
150:8
160:5
161:2,5,
19
Haverhill's
28:13
104:10
Hawkins
30:10
51:14,21
53:19,23
74:20
99:6
104:6
108:16,
18,22
109:3,5,6
110:2
112:5
113:17,22
114:7
122:8,16,
22 123:12
125:20
131:4
132:4,10
139:5
176:18
179:16
Hawkins'
115:10
head
8:11
21:10
22:12
25:11
26:8,20
42:14
58:1
heading
50:6 51:5
56:15
154:7
heads
22:12
23:15,18
24:10,14,
18
heard
103:22
125:21
hearing
94:3
136:21
140:6
169:9
heck
9:10
34:23
held
94:3
highlighted
61:16
highway
48:16
77:12
101:8
110:16
170:13
highways
21:20
hindered
138:20
hire
21:18
74:13,21
75:2
98:1,13,
17,18
105:3,6
109:7
119:21
hired
49:23
51:8,13,
16,20
109:10
125:5,15
hiring
18:19
19:4
73:9,17
117:12
125:2
129:8
historical
84:19
104:11
163:1,14
historicall
y
34:13
98:20
history
162:12
hold
80:14
88:8
hone
138:4
honestly
163:12
Hope
175:17
horse
35:6
hour
166:16
hourly
19:5
Howard
87:4
156:16
HR
19:7,11
118:20
119:16
human
18:22
21:20
Hundred-
and-
something
162:13
hundreds
164:13,17
hurt
138:19,20
hypothetica
l
33:1,2
hypothetica
lly
142:14
I
idea
42:4 56:4
80:4 99:6
123:8
178:1
identificat
ion
60:8
68:20
75:8
122:2
130:20
146:23
153:19
155:7
165:7
172:14
174:11
identified
114:23
identify
173:6
illegal
156:6
immediately
72:22
94:19
impact
72:7
impartial
105:19
impartialit
y
103:9,17
104:19
implicate
109:14
important
9:6
164:21
impossible
164:3
impression
180:8
in-depth
74:7
inactions
139:1,2
include
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: Haverhill's..include
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
121:5
included
19:3
111:21
117:4,11
includes
17:14
including
99:19
136:14
incredibly
164:1,9
169:11
independent
ly
44:7
132:5
indicating
95:13
175:21
indication
86:21
98:12
103:16
104:19
105:17
114:12
individual
14:20
47:12
50:18
73:20
78:23
79:1,3,14
80:12
81:1
86:14
88:17
89:19
167:23
individuall
y
78:22
157:2
individuals
21:18
142:16
147:9
154:18
infer
107:5
inference
149:3
inferences
148:20
informal
81:8
informally
140:8
information
32:19
43:17
84:7,11,
15,19
85:1,7,
13,14,17
86:1
94:12
100:3,7,9
101:4
102:8
137:10
150:16
156:3
162:7,22
163:7
164:2,20
167:19
168:13,22
169:1,16,
18,21
170:4
171:3
180:12,14
informed
137:18
initial
83:8
initially
7:12
72:23
82:23
96:2
127:14
150:17
initiate
47:14
48:21
injure
139:11
injured
139:20
140:3,12
172:5
injury
138:17
143:21
input
28:3
153:4
insert
165:11
inside
86:16
insignifica
nt
171:5
insistent
123:12
insisting
180:21
instance
8:17
149:9
instruction
158:21
instrumenta
l
136:4
insuperable
109:4
intend
41:2
intended
40:19
42:13
43:17
46:1
74:3,13,
21 178:15
intends
123:5
intent
37:16
38:6,7,8,
14 40:7
41:22
46:5,14
73:22
75:1
98:1,4,6
131:8,15
160:7
179:4,8
intention
178:9,21
interact
114:8,13
138:9,21
interacted
137:8,17
interacting
114:2
143:22
interaction
164:12
interaction
s
138:1
144:8
interchange
able
34:18
interconnec
ted
115:15,19
interest
37:10,21
40:21
41:14
44:2,16
45:7 47:5
69:17,19
71:4,8,
10,11,18
72:10
108:17,22
115:8,9
117:2
177:1
interim
76:7,8
interrogato
ry
107:18
invalid
87:2
investigati
on
14:18
invoice
55:17,20
invoices
24:23
25:2,9,
11,15
121:9,13
129:20,
22,23
130:9
131:21
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: included..invoices
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
132:8
133:11,19
135:22
involve
109:14
involved
22:7,9
23:10,16
30:3,7,11
43:21
47:10
53:16
56:6,8
57:9
63:10
92:8 99:9
109:7
110:10
111:14
112:7
133:3
143:19
176:18
involvement
20:14
involves
48:5
issue
31:2
35:23
36:15
45:11
53:2
56:9,12,
19 57:3
58:1
73:10,18
74:14
76:11,14,
17 77:3
88:16,21
89:4
90:21
91:4,16
92:1,6,18
94:14
96:4 97:1
98:16
99:2
110:6,14,
17 112:6
113:16
114:1,7,
15 117:7
121:2,10
124:3
125:3,6
129:9
130:3,8
131:22,23
134:3,8,
10,16,23
136:10
138:2
146:4
162:5
175:4
176:23
177:23
issued
33:16
34:5 58:5
issues
81:15
138:5
149:14,18
176:16
178:13
issuing
56:21
94:6
items
135:21
iteration
105:23
iterations
105:15
J
James
86:4
147:5,10
Jamie
139:16
147:8,10
January
11:23
12:10,18
13:2
58:7,8
69:4
70:17
74:18
75:4,12,
22 77:23
88:2,12
89:23
90:12
92:5,16,
18 93:21
95:15,18
96:14
97:3
99:11,21
100:11
108:16
109:1,9
112:5
113:8
122:8,14
123:3
124:21
145:17
146:11
147:2,17
150:1
153:2,17
154:17
169:7
174:1,2
175:1,2
176:15
177:20
179:11
Jennifer
41:21
69:8
84:14
91:20
92:2 97:2
99:17
117:18
118:4,12,
19 128:2
129:14
152:15
153:4,6
158:16
176:16
178:9,11,
21 179:16
Jim
6:13
job
11:6 99:1
Johnston
93:13
judgment
28:14
81:15
116:13
121:21
130:16
147:23
148:3,15,
16,19
149:12,20
170:8
171:16
172:10,17
181:15
Justice
122:20
K
Katie
101:16,22
164:13,17
165:21
168:11
169:22
keeping
158:16
Kevin
45:12
46:5
101:15,21
131:11
163:21
165:16,20
166:2,18,
19 168:11
169:19
170:2,17
Kevin's
45:20
167:9
168:4
kind
12:15
13:14
19:8 21:1
24:23
67:5,23
72:16
81:13
94:16
125:17
127:12
132:19
143:3
145:11
146:2
150:13
168:1
180:2
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: involve..kind
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
KLINE
6:13,15,
17,19,21
13:19
14:2,8,14
16:19
17:9
18:10
19:1,9,17
21:14
23:20
24:11
25:6
26:18
27:9,22
28:7,19
29:14,23
30:8,17
31:3,10
32:9,22
33:23
34:9
35:19
36:16
37:13
38:2,19
39:4,14,
23 40:10
41:4,17
42:18
43:14
44:4,17
45:8
47:16,22
48:23
49:15
50:8,14
52:12,22
53:14
54:4,13,
20 55:15,
22 56:18
57:5
58:2,23
59:20
60:3,10
67:9,21
68:10
73:11
78:5,18
79:18
80:6,14
81:11,13
96:5
99:4,22
109:16
110:12,22
111:19
113:5,11
115:22
117:15
120:8
130:5
132:1
134:18
141:20
142:7
147:20,22
148:2,9
158:8
160:15
161:6
163:10,15
165:1
170:5,7
171:7,9,
23 177:2
178:17
181:18
Knapp
45:13
46:5
101:15,21
163:21
165:16,20
166:2
169:19
knew
30:13
42:11
92:13
145:16
176:21
178:4
knots
7:18
know's
139:14
knowing
10:3
knowledge
32:18
80:3
123:11
knowledgeab
le
21:12
kosher
26:7
L
labeled
121:19
labored
136:16,22
138:5
lack
103:16
104:19
132:15
Lake
15:13
Lakes
69:21
70:11
72:5
language
150:12
larger
24:22
late
90:6
latest
174:15
Laura
122:19
law
14:6 29:2
32:3 54:2
92:4,9
95:6,8,
20,21
96:23
98:14
100:3
108:17,21
111:5,18,
21 117:6,
12 119:16
laws
161:15,22
lawsuit
29:4,7
43:20
44:12
47:9,15,
20 48:4,
8,14,22
49:10,17
50:5
51:1,2,4,
9 52:8
56:23
57:4,13,
23 59:2,3
65:14
66:12
68:9,17
76:14,17,
23 77:7,
14
110:11,20
111:2,14
112:8,13,
19 113:9,
13 115:11
116:10
181:16
lawyer
119:21
lawyers
54:7
73:10,17
74:4 95:4
98:2,11,
17 105:3
109:1
123:9
layers
15:15,18
24:19
25:8,10
lead
88:9,15,
21 90:20
91:3,15,
17
leadership
11:20
leading
78:20
leave
104:14
left
8:20 9:2
37:19
38:15
39:12,21
42:13
58:22
legal
13:23
14:4
29:11,18
34:15
36:5
37:3,11
38:16
39:10,16
40:22
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: KLINE..legal
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
41:14
42:10
46:2,8,17
47:21
48:6,19
49:9,11
50:4,6,21
51:3,5,
11,18
52:10,18
53:10,11
54:9,18
55:6,10
56:15
62:1
63:4,6,8,
15,18,20,
23 64:1,
2,10,13,
21,23
65:8,17
67:14
68:5
71:21
105:2
110:17
113:22,23
116:23
117:10
118:9,13
119:3,9,
10,22
121:9
123:23
140:4
152:4
155:19
156:10,11
158:12,13
159:4
legally
83:19
124:7
legislation
48:13
109:23
111:3
112:7
155:23
160:8
legitimatel
y
145:21
LEHMANN
120:11
142:4
148:14,
18,22
149:6,11,
16 172:9,
15 181:17
length
95:7
letter
32:1
56:21
58:5
92:10
96:21
103:10
104:2
105:7,16
106:1
136:2
144:11,
13,15
145:1,4,
15 176:2,
5 179:20,
23 180:5,
17 181:2,
8
letters
28:23
133:6
letting
58:10
59:4
123:20
level
165:5
levels
175:3
liar
149:21
licensed
13:17
licenses
13:13
licensing
13:11
limited
148:3
limiting
81:14
lines
20:23
25:15
61:15
77:2
94:14
144:3
157:21
164:6
list
95:6
135:21
literally
63:8,22
164:13,17
litigated
53:19
110:3
litigating
77:13
155:21
litigation
109:15,23
110:5
111:1
112:18
116:15
live
14:22
lives
102:4
log
83:3
logs
83:7
Lombardi
122:19
long
10:3,15
11:10
34:23
145:9
179:18
longer
33:21,22
36:18
37:9
46:15
looked
32:6
40:13
75:15,18
127:23
128:3
175:12
lot
24:13
26:3 67:3
84:9,18
100:21
144:6
162:21
167:20
169:22
lots
103:5
lump
147:18
150:2
151:19
lunch
116:6
Lynnette
122:8
M
Macomber
122:8
made
23:3
27:14
38:10
40:5 43:8
44:6
46:1,19
58:8,16
61:17
72:19
73:21
74:20
85:14
88:19
98:8
100:2
106:21
107:21,23
108:6
109:5
112:12
126:8,18
127:6,10
128:21
129:14
148:23
152:9,11,
18,23
160:6,9
167:18
170:17
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: legally..made
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
178:10,14
179:6
Maher
122:15
124:22
179:17,23
mailed
12:12
127:16
maintenance
21:19
22:12
majority
143:11
make
24:14,18
26:23
42:9
45:13
49:4
50:11
61:23
70:12,22
75:16
86:23
88:17
89:20
93:8
112:13
116:16
120:1,18
124:10,13
127:2
157:6
162:2
makes
59:12
making
26:21
49:8
50:20
75:17
89:6
116:22
161:8
management
11:20
19:11
manager
10:23
11:8
17:3,5,6,
17,21
18:3,7,
12,15,17,
21 19:15,
23 20:8,
9,10,14
21:7 22:8
23:14,17
24:7
25:8,23
26:14,16
27:8,11,
14,15,17
32:17
35:14,21
37:7,23
46:6,23
50:2 53:4
58:19
67:23
71:9 81:9
82:16
86:23
88:22
92:3
101:1
116:19
118:1,6,
10,15,16,
23 119:7,
11,19,23
126:13
148:7
150:8,9
158:5,10
159:2
161:4,18,
21 166:3,
18 176:4
manager's
23:13
25:1,4
36:3
160:12
managers
161:22
manner
8:14 18:6
March
45:10
61:12
63:5
90:6,7,8,
9,12,16
141:13
171:17
mark
60:2
121:22
marked
60:7 61:9
68:20
69:1 75:7
113:3
122:1,4
130:19
146:22
153:18,20
155:6
165:6
172:13
174:11
markings
113:2
master's
11:19,21
match
174:19
materials
21:9
24:1,9,21
25:4
Matt
87:4
156:9,14,
21
matter
30:5,7
37:2
39:22
42:10
48:9,10,
11 51:22
63:8,16,
18 64:10
65:17
68:5 70:1
75:3
91:21
92:10,12
103:20
105:11
109:12,
14,18
112:15
113:16
114:22
115:20
130:14
134:22
151:16
155:21
177:7
matters
33:17
34:15
36:5
37:3,11,
20 38:16,
17 39:10,
16 40:22
41:14
46:3,8,17
47:21
48:6,19
49:9,11
50:4,7,21
51:3,5,19
52:10
55:14
56:16
62:1
63:4,6,21
64:13,23
65:8,11,
12 69:15
98:15,20
99:8
105:5,11,
12,22
116:23
117:10
119:15
132:4
Matuszko
122:23
meaning
15:4
32:15
38:7 47:1
88:20
156:21
meant
102:19
107:5
meet
146:18
meeting
22:23
34:5
36:11
43:6
45:11,12
46:4,12
60:7
61:12
62:5,11,
18,22
68:3,20
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: Maher..meeting
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
69:3 75:4
79:5,11,
15,20,23
84:8,12
85:18,22,
23 86:2,
3,10
87:12
89:16,22
90:3,5,9,
11 92:15,
21,22
93:1,4,
11,12,21,
23 95:14,
17 96:14
97:3
102:23
104:22
106:20
111:10
119:14,
18,20
120:2,5,
6,14
135:23
140:20
141:12
145:19
146:6,12
156:12,22
157:9
158:19
159:3,7,9
169:3,8
171:20
174:4
177:9,19
181:4
meetings
20:11,12,
13 23:5
38:9
45:22
55:8
62:9,17
79:2 81:3
86:17
100:12
102:21
106:12
130:13
156:11,17
169:4,7
meetings[
sic
79:1
meets
90:10
member
51:11
74:11
89:13,20
102:11
106:17
165:22
166:3
members
30:13
39:3
43:8,18,
22 44:3,
13 45:1,
23 46:21
47:1
50:19
55:5
56:2,5
73:8,14
75:1,5
78:22
79:7,14
80:13
81:2
86:14,18,
19,20
88:17
89:5
91:20
96:22
97:23
98:10
100:22
101:22
128:13
156:2,7
163:18
164:19
members'
38:14
memorialize
65:20
memorialize
d
81:7
memory
153:13
154:22
157:10
mentioned
180:5
message
123:2
160:21
174:7
175:15
176:10
177:5
messages
172:13
173:8,21
174:3,10,
23 175:10
180:4
met
131:10
micromanage
159:1
mid-
february
87:9,16
middle
57:7,16
128:20
129:1
169:2,3
Mike
101:18
173:8
174:3
175:7,8
mind
7:22 75:6
144:10
minds
35:8
mine
65:3
minor
72:12
minute
104:23
minutes
38:8,21,
23 40:9,
12,16,17,
23 41:9
42:5 43:5
55:8 60:7
61:12
62:5,11,
19,21
68:20
69:3
78:20
86:8,12
95:1,13
96:15
97:16
102:21
106:19,20
107:11,20
108:13
159:5
misbehaving
161:2
misremember
ing
12:11
misundersta
nding
73:5
misundersto
od
73:3,6
Mitchell
118:20
131:5
136:14
moment
7:10 98:1
125:12
money
65:16
67:4,5,6,
12,17,19
68:1
110:19
146:7
month
128:6
morning
166:4
motion
38:10
40:5
41:21
44:6
45:13,20,
21 46:1,
19 61:17,
21 98:5,7
116:13
120:1,19
130:16
171:16
178:10,
14,22
179:6
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: meetings..motion
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
181:15
motions
81:15
121:20
Mountain
15:12
69:21
70:11
72:5
move
82:1
98:10
multiple
154:5
municipal
16:17
24:4
118:20
137:3,4
140:1,4,
14 147:13
municipalit
ies
136:20
161:23
N
named
101:20
names
15:11
16:3
Naomi
118:21
131:5
132:3
narratives
131:10
narrow
35:9
necessarily
84:8
95:22
109:3
142:2
needed
20:22
21:9
22:5,6,13
28:2,3
35:17
64:10
67:6
85:7,13
91:22
94:5
138:21
152:4
177:19
180:17,18
181:9
needing
155:2
negative
107:6,7
120:12
negotiated
57:15
112:21
negotiation
s
66:10,19,
20 112:10
newest
174:15
newly
44:19
90:10
news
108:14
newspaper
107:21
newspapers
108:1
NHMA
137:2
nicely
145:1
176:1,4
night
97:20
nodding
8:11
non-
departed
148:19
nonmeeting
177:7,15,
17,22
178:3
nonmoving
148:18
149:13
nonpublic
38:12,21
39:1
40:18
41:1,9
60:7
61:12
62:6,13,
18,20,22
95:17
99:10,20
100:12
120:4,9,
16,17
normal
7:20
North
15:12
16:23
17:1
Norwich
11:18
notation
154:4
note
181:13
notes
43:5 81:6
notice
145:12,19
notificatio
ns
166:21
notified
94:4
notorious
168:11
number
12:16
62:8 78:1
96:16
167:5
numerous
170:19
O
O'SHANA
80:16
oath
61:7
116:7
171:14
object
60:14
objection
13:19
14:2,8,14
16:19
17:9
18:10
19:1,9,17
21:14
23:20
24:11
25:6
26:18
27:9,22
28:7,19
29:14,23
30:8,17
31:3,10
32:9,22
33:23
34:9
35:19
36:16
37:13
38:2,19
39:4,14,
23 40:10
41:4,17
42:18
43:14
44:4,17
45:8
47:16,22
48:23
49:15
50:8,14
52:12,22
53:14
54:4,13,
20 55:15,
22 56:18
57:5
58:2,23
59:20
67:9,21
68:10
73:11
78:5,18
79:18
80:6
81:11
96:5
99:4,22
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: motions..objection
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
109:16
110:12,22
111:19
113:5,11
117:15
120:8
130:5
132:1
134:18
141:20
147:20
158:8
160:15
161:6
163:10,15
165:1
170:5
171:23
172:9,16
177:2
178:17
objections
6:17
60:11
obtain
11:21
63:23
occur
20:6
86:16
125:7
occurred
35:13
36:11
37:4,8
44:11
79:10
81:2
128:7
141:13
178:3
occurring
177:15
odd
103:23
offensive
108:7
offer
16:10
20:9
offers
16:21
office
55:1 79:6
82:14
84:10
100:23
103:8,13,
20
104:10,
13,14,15
115:5
122:20
125:13
127:15,
16,20
128:2
156:23
157:8
158:15
164:14
171:18,21
officer
12:20
13:12
Officer's
12:23
offices
125:1
official
34:4
103:19
officially
34:4
omissions
139:1
on-boarding
90:11
one-page
147:1
one-time
56:7
ongoing
77:15
open
139:16
operated
71:14
operating
89:17
90:1,14
operation
48:18
operations
18:19
109:22
110:15
opinion
53:1,3
72:9
100:18
144:5,7
155:19
156:10,11
159:4,8
opportunity
26:9
100:6
opposition
81:16
oppositiona
l
101:7
129:15
order
81:14
128:4,5
148:3
ordered
24:14
organizatio
ns
137:1
original
48:14
75:11
originally
26:20
46:1
72:18
other's
70:3
out-of-
district
16:23
outcome
42:6
181:15
overlapped
115:18
oversees
17:7
overwhelmed
164:18
overwhelmin
g
164:14
owed
57:11
P
p.m.
75:23
122:15
174:5
181:20
packet
171:2
174:15
pages
172:21
173:6
174:1,14,
16,17,18
175:11
paid
25:12
29:21
121:15
paragraph
69:6,11
76:12
116:14
131:3,7
161:13
171:15
paragraphs
76:10
parameters
50:6
part
18:8
23:19
66:20
67:13
76:21
78:7
151:20
153:1
155:3
parties
65:19
67:8
70:21
71:13
partner
108:23
party
59:10
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: objections..party
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
149:13
passed
141:15
past
28:6
69:22
70:10,12
71:21
99:3
152:16
Pause
60:23
75:9
173:1
pay
19:5
49:22
67:19
121:8,11,
14 129:23
130:3,4,9
131:8,15
paying
24:16
25:9
payment
26:12
57:12
58:8,16
59:12,14
67:6,12
112:11,14
129:20
payments
24:20
26:21
65:15
112:17
116:16
peers
161:21
pending
181:14
people
19:11
21:22
83:23
101:20
114:9
133:8
138:8,14
161:14
percent
53:16
perform
55:6
133:10
136:11
performance
117:7
119:15
performed
24:3 25:3
52:18
113:22
124:2,18
135:6
performing
34:13
periodic
20:2
permission
159:17
person
14:21
45:19
53:3
personal
51:11
173:18
personally
36:2 51:6
personnel
55:13
105:11,
12,22
129:9
131:22
perspective
51:8,9,
18,23
103:22
132:18,23
133:16
135:12
138:19
161:8
164:23
167:21
168:20
180:11
Peter
92:19,22
93:14
114:9
122:13
123:8,14,
17,19
135:15
136:1
137:9
139:6,7,
13 144:5
145:2
162:10,21
petition
28:14
47:13
48:21
49:13
82:21
87:8
150:12
petitioned
148:4
petitions
82:11,12
83:18
140:19
142:11
151:1
phase
25:5 83:8
phone
93:15
125:19
143:12,
14,18,20,
22 164:7
167:5,7
173:17,
18,19
photocopies
172:21
photograph
165:9,10
phrase
9:17 24:7
28:6 48:5
63:2,6,20
64:13
114:3
176:1
pick
116:8
143:14
picked
146:17,19
picking
24:2
Pike
16:1
place
38:11
92:21
157:7
play
168:18
played
33:4 67:2
156:19
playing
162:2
pled
76:16
point
8:19
10:3,4,8
44:8 46:7
56:1
58:20
70:20
76:7
78:21
88:1
98:4,13,
19 99:15
101:12
116:12
126:9
127:18
130:1
145:5,8
176:14,20
179:10
180:16
pointed
89:18
91:5
pointedly
125:23
pointing
114:23
160:13,20
police
16:4
policies
27:1
political
28:4
poor
9:11
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: passed..poor
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
poorly
9:13
portal
82:18
83:4
150:18,23
152:4
portion
131:4
posed
10:7
position
10:16
11:6,10
15:3
17:19
31:8 36:3
52:1
73:16
74:3
90:19
97:22
113:15
124:4,5
126:12
128:16
129:7,11
135:6
136:7
146:3
148:6
149:6
160:12
possession
100:4
126:20
possibility
176:18
post
68:8,15
pot
110:19
potentially
179:9
power
32:20
33:21
34:8
36:13,22
37:2,9,19
38:15
39:13,21
40:7,19
41:2
43:23
45:5
46:15
47:4
50:23
61:23
119:2,8
practice
13:17
pre-
approval
27:19
163:8
pre-reveal
78:9
precariousn
ess
160:9
precedent
161:10
Precinct
62:2 63:4
64:3 65:2
preparing
169:5
prepping
169:3
prereview
82:15
150:4,5,
19,21
151:2,5,
10,21
153:2
155:3
163:9
prescribes
18:6
present
23:2 48:4
51:2 52:8
69:7,9
80:16
89:22
125:9
presentatio
n
60:14
presented
26:11
42:3
preserved
6:17
60:11
presume
7:8 9:9,
22 153:12
presuming
118:7
pretty
41:22
87:20
101:18
123:17
previous
12:2
45:23
95:1
101:6
115:10
previously
49:6
50:17
170:2
Primarily
28:12
printed
8:20
printout
165:9,15
printouts
174:16
prior
10:21
11:2
17:23
66:11
69:23
70:1
77:22
87:11
138:23
141:17
142:12
143:2,19
156:8,13
169:20
problem
56:9,12
77:15
91:6
94:16
114:2
problematic
71:17
procedural
92:15,20
93:20,23
145:18
146:6,7
procedure
177:10
procedures
27:2
89:17
90:1,14
process
21:2,3,7
22:17
23:4
24:22
27:16
31:23
32:6,21
33:10,12
78:7,11
81:9 82:7
91:8,22
95:3 96:1
151:5,10,
21 153:2
155:3
163:9
produce
71:3
93:10
95:5
produced
62:16
96:21
104:6
105:16
127:12
producing
106:5
product
168:5
products
23:11
24:1
prohibited
33:8,9,14
project
11:9
22:15
projects
22:21
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: poorly..projects
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
23:2,5
proper
26:6
161:10,11
properly
94:3
181:5
property
20:18
63:11
64:17
74:13
proponents
111:23
proscriptio
n
103:17
104:11
protect
137:12,
14,15
138:15
protecting
136:17
prove
149:16
provide
8:9 10:7
11:14
16:12
20:7 30:2
54:17
57:10
85:11
89:7
119:2,9,
21 135:7,
9,11
provided
18:2
23:11
25:3
28:16
29:11,18
51:12
54:10,18
55:11
84:11
85:2
112:2
121:9
135:5
145:11
173:16
providing
14:12
86:1
163:1
173:13,20
public
20:12,13
36:11
46:12
62:17
74:18
79:2,5,
11,14,23
81:3
83:13
86:16,17
94:3
95:14
104:22
120:6,14,
18 134:21
156:22
158:19
159:7
publicly
89:21
119:13
120:2,5
177:9,19
181:4
pull
107:11
108:1
purchase
170:14
purported
51:12
purports
48:9
purpose
35:5 46:2
119:14
purposes
16:12
pursuing
53:21
purview
18:21
pushy
180:21
put
22:5,18
33:10
51:4
78:15
99:20
100:11
111:4,9,
17 128:3,
4,19,20
135:8
141:11
149:17
150:18
puts
166:19
167:4
Q
question
7:16,20
8:1,2,10,
17 9:7,
13,15,21,
23 10:6
14:17
20:19
22:1 26:9
50:12,16
52:6 55:9
60:14,22
82:19
83:12,13,
21 108:20
116:9
120:11
125:18
168:15,17
169:12
176:23
questioning
42:22
43:10
questions
7:14 9:11
14:13
28:13
83:16,17
132:15
133:6
151:7
162:11
166:9
181:13
quick
60:4
quorum
89:22
104:22
quote
52:9
quote/
unquote
25:10
32:16
97:11
158:2
quoted
103:1
106:13
R
radar
81:22
ran
172:3
rapid-fire
169:5
rarely
166:19
167:4
rate
31:1,6,23
32:3
36:15
48:8,11
56:13
73:10,18
74:14
75:3
76:11,18
77:3,5,11
89:4
90:21
91:4,15,
21 92:1,
6,9,12,
14,18
93:22
94:6,8,11
96:4
98:16
105:11
109:12,
13,18
112:6
114:1,6,
15,19,21,
22 121:2
123:5,6,
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: proper..rate
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
13,21
124:18
125:3
129:8
131:22
134:4,10,
22 136:4
145:3,10,
12,20
146:4
162:5
175:4,16
176:6
177:7
178:13
rates
19:5
175:17
ratify
177:8
rating
99:2
reach
22:3
97:3,11,
21 140:4
167:16
reached
85:5
132:5
137:9
140:17
156:1
reaching
142:9
read
29:5
60:22
74:18
83:9
107:19
156:11
159:7,23
166:10
167:10
reading
9:2 129:2
reads
9:4
ready
60:22
128:23
169:7,8
real
64:17
72:14
realize
99:18
realm
52:16
reared
58:1
reason
28:4
45:18
81:18
101:2,3
142:8
146:10
reasons
68:18
101:3
recall
13:8
36:23
37:3 57:2
58:4 63:5
65:18,21,
23 66:2,
6,14,16
67:2
74:5,11
75:4 86:1
89:3,5
107:12,17
108:11
116:12
125:7
126:10
128:6
130:7
131:17
132:6
139:23
140:22
142:20,23
145:14
152:17,23
153:5,7,8
155:15
156:16
157:4
158:19
159:3
162:4,8,
17,19,20,
21 163:3,
4,13,18
166:14
173:13,
20,23
175:13
receive
11:21
127:21
133:20
received
12:19
25:1 94:2
100:15
104:6
123:14
125:20
128:22
133:21
146:10
166:5
167:12
174:23
receives
93:9
150:11
recent
11:6
recess
60:5
80:15
116:3
171:10
recognize
61:11
recollectio
n
94:21
97:9,13,
15 129:6
157:10
159:6
recommend
177:8
record
6:8,11
10:9 55:8
60:3,9,21
61:7
75:16,17
79:13
80:17
93:4
104:23
116:4,7
120:20
135:23
142:4,7
154:2
157:9
171:9,11,
14
recorded
7:12
38:23
78:16
106:13
records
37:6
84:20
156:18
162:9
recruitment
21:2
reelected
171:22
reelection
172:3
refer
28:22
99:16
102:18
129:10
178:22
referred
19:7 30:5
64:3
113:1
referring
56:11
99:3
123:4
143:20
144:9
reflected
38:8
40:8,15,
17,23
95:12
96:14
97:15
133:10,18
135:22
136:2
refuse
131:8,15
refusing
76:18
134:4
regard
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: rates..regard
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
25:9 65:2
91:21
106:22
118:19
registered
82:12
154:5
regular
13:10
20:2
regularly
136:1,2
140:5
reiterate
80:18
179:3
reiterated
46:11
reiterating
160:6
relate
52:9,20
56:14
110:9
163:14
related
15:2
33:17
34:15,16
39:16
46:3,8,17
47:8
51:19
55:13,17
56:7 62:1
63:4,7
70:2
91:13
94:6
100:4
105:12
113:19
114:19
115:1,19
117:10
123:11
130:13
151:22
152:1,2
155:20,22
160:8,9
relates
47:21
48:19
49:10
51:2
81:22
91:14
relating
36:5
37:3,12
38:17
39:10
40:22
41:14
42:10
47:21
48:6,20
49:9,11
50:4,7,22
51:3
52:10
56:16
64:9 65:8
68:5,9
104:9
108:12
116:23
relation
64:13
89:23
94:23
161:21
relations
99:7
relationshi
ps
136:14,23
137:4
138:7,22,
23
relative
167:7
relevant
81:15
rely
23:18
24:10,13
remained
118:12
remember
8:23 9:1
37:5
45:16
76:9
84:17
95:19
107:14
108:3,4,5
113:6
146:15
147:13
151:13,18
156:15
162:4,23
163:12,
17,21,23
173:12,22
174:6,7
remind
8:23
remove
45:13
rep
139:18
147:10
rephrase
14:16
23:22
replaced
22:6,13
replacement
11:8
replicate
154:8
replied
175:17
replies
180:7
reply
89:7
166:17
170:20
report
19:21,23
20:10
reporter
6:3 14:18
reports
84:17
represent
70:14
96:3
109:11
113:18
132:3
representat
ion
71:21,22
72:7
105:2
123:23
124:1
165:14
representat
ions
69:23
70:2,3
72:6
representat
ive
95:1
103:11
represented
30:11
53:23
69:21
70:10,11,
21 71:13
72:4,5
102:21
representin
g
69:20
72:21
107:15
reputation
138:19
139:3
140:2,12
reputationa
l
143:21
request
29:12,19
85:12,14
93:8
100:2
126:23
127:6,11,
12 132:10
158:6
159:10
164:5
169:12
requested
128:23
155:19
162:8
requesting
86:22
164:20
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: registered..requesting
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
requests
164:14
168:12
169:20
170:16
173:14
required
58:20
89:8
requirement
104:8
requiring
116:16
requisition
121:14
resident
14:21
54:23
170:22
residents
16:13
168:12
170:4
resolution
67:7
resolve
67:14
134:3,8
135:2
175:4
resolved
92:7
112:19
134:11,12
135:1
resource
18:22
22:5
resources
21:20
respect
8:13
16:18
18:1,3
25:2
28:21
29:4,5
31:7 32:5
35:23
37:11
38:16
40:22
42:10
46:17
49:8
50:1,2,
19,21
51:1,21
52:17
53:10
56:9,12
59:9
60:15
61:20
63:2 65:8
68:16
72:16
73:7,10,
14,16
78:10
82:3
84:5,6,22
85:20
87:14
88:15,20
89:4
90:20
91:3,8
92:1,6,17
96:3 97:8
100:10
104:19
105:20
106:11
108:16
116:19,22
119:6,11
121:2
129:7,19
134:3
136:6
137:23
140:13
143:3,18
152:17
154:13
160:12
166:22
172:6
176:14
177:22
respond
164:19
166:17
168:14
181:7
responded
140:10
180:9
responding
101:19
180:10
response
8:9 89:7,
9,11
90:18,22
144:4,9
164:4
167:13
responses
8:13
162:7
173:14
responsibil
ities
17:18,21
18:18
19:12
27:8
160:4
responsibil
ity
20:21
21:1
26:23
34:3,12
39:11,20
40:6
41:13
42:9
46:23
49:7
50:21
61:23
64:20
65:1,7
88:8
116:21
117:4
158:10,17
responsible
18:7
23:12
25:16
35:21
restate
9:16
result
77:16
111:16
138:17
retain
74:3,13
75:2
98:11
117:5
119:2,9,
14 126:2
177:7,14,
22
retained
65:9
109:10
125:5
134:1,7
178:16
179:13,19
180:1
retainer
118:22
retaining
73:9,17
125:2
129:8,11
177:18
retention
14:6
37:21
revenue
56:10
157:19
reverse
11:16
review
19:19
25:20
27:16,19
33:10,12
35:16
37:9,20,
21 40:20
41:13
44:1,15
45:6
46:15
47:4
55:18
56:2
75:13
78:7
81:10
82:7,17
89:23
90:14
100:14,17
117:6,12
128:21,23
155:2
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: requests..review
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
165:18
reviewed
19:15
25:12
29:5,8
134:14
reviewing
24:8
reviews
37:22
revised
105:18,21
106:8
revisions
106:3,4
RFPR
20:22
rise
43:20
44:12
165:4
Robbin
101:21
Robbins
54:22
73:21
75:23
76:4
88:2,13
101:15
102:3
171:17
175:14
180:7
robin
168:19
roderick
80:16
role
11:10
18:3,15
19:22
21:7,22
23:13
25:2,4
33:20
34:8
35:15
37:18
39:9,20
40:2,6
42:9 49:7
50:1
66:18
106:17
116:19,21
117:11
119:12
160:4,11
161:4
176:4
roles
17:18,20
21:5
roof
22:5,13,
18 175:3
room
8:19 9:9
128:20
129:1
Roth
92:19,22
93:14
114:9
122:13
123:8,14,
17 135:15
136:1
137:9
139:6,13
144:5
145:2
Roth's
162:11
roughly
166:16
round
168:19
RSA
18:5,6
38:4
137:11
rule
149:12
rules
7:8
148:15
run
28:6
running
91:7
S
SB
176:10,21
177:6
scales
19:5
scathing
144:5
scenario
119:19
scene
14:18
scenes
53:17
school
69:21
70:3,7,9,
10,18
72:4,15,
18,23
73:2
92:14
94:1,10
146:9,10,
12
scope
63:13
105:2,4
106:6
147:22
148:5
160:11
161:18
164:15
170:7
screenshots
173:21
seat
88:22
172:2
second-to-
last
69:11
131:3,6
157:23
161:12
175:20
seek
20:22
seeking
21:21
29:20
100:15
select
17:6,7,11
18:13
20:11
22:19
23:2 26:1
28:2,5
30:13
33:1
45:12,15
46:4
49:2,3
51:11
68:1,11
69:2
78:13,16
88:7
89:19
90:4
103:12
126:1
138:6
156:10
176:10,
17,21
selection
21:3
22:17
selectmen
19:14
20:4,7
26:15
27:4,14,
20 29:13,
20 31:5
32:20
33:15,19,
21 34:7
36:3,13
37:1,9,19
38:6
39:9,12,
21 40:4,
18 41:12
42:3,8
43:19
44:13,14
45:2
46:14,19
47:2,18
49:6,12
50:3,22
52:1
55:12
61:21
62:9,15,
16,23
64:19
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: reviewed..selectmen
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
66:7
73:8,9,
15,16
74:12,22
75:2 76:6
79:3 81:2
86:8,9,
13,22
88:14
89:14,18
90:20
91:3,15
97:8,23
99:10
100:10
102:11
106:17
107:1
109:10
114:18
115:6
116:20
117:10
118:8,13
119:2,6,
8,18,21
120:3,13,
22
126:11,18
127:10,14
128:13
129:8
130:1,11
134:14,20
158:21
163:19
164:20
165:23
176:21
177:14,21
selectmen's
38:8
179:12
Self-
contained
16:14
Senator
155:23
send
71:3 78:8
82:16
86:9
133:7
145:7
147:18
150:1,18,
20 151:20
152:12
153:9
155:2,17
158:21,23
159:18
160:21
168:16,18
sending
145:6
151:1
153:1
154:22
155:15
156:8,13
157:12
159:13
162:7,20
163:13
sends
165:20
166:3
sense
24:5
156:4
sentence
61:18,20
131:6,12
132:12,17
158:1
167:3
sentiment
137:16
sentiments
78:12,15
separate
51:22
62:18
76:17
121:5
serve
51:21
served
18:15
99:8
service
16:12,16,
17,21
25:13
services
16:17
17:1 25:3
28:15,21
29:11,18
51:12
52:18
53:10
54:9,18
55:6,11
113:23
121:9
133:10,18
135:5
serving
106:23
107:22
session
38:12
39:1
40:18
41:1,10
62:6,13,
22 95:17
120:4,6,
16,18
sessions
62:18
99:10,21
set
6:20
27:19
31:6 32:4
33:4 61:2
76:12,18
77:3,11
92:22
93:22
94:10
95:12
123:5
134:4
145:2,10,
12,16
161:9,10
173:3
174:13
175:11,16
176:6
sets
62:17,19
setting
18:19
19:4 30:5
31:2,23
35:23
36:15
48:8,11
56:13,19
57:3 58:1
73:10,18
74:14
75:3 77:5
88:15
89:4
90:21
91:4,15,
21 92:1,
6,10,12,
18 94:6
96:4
98:16
99:2
105:11
109:12,
13,18
112:6
114:1,6,
15,22
121:2,10
123:6,21
124:3,19
125:3
129:9
131:22
134:8,10,
16,22,23
136:4,10
145:19
146:4
162:5
177:23
178:13
settle
66:22
settled
65:17
112:9,20
113:3
116:16
settlement
57:7,12,
16,17,18
58:8,21
59:3,5,
10,23
65:20,22
66:1,4,8,
10,12,19,
20 76:23
110:4
112:10,
21,23
settling
67:16
sewer
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: selectmen's..sewer
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
16:9,18,
21,22,23
shaded
61:16
shaking
8:11
shared
34:11,12
sheet
131:1
154:6
shorthand
6:10 7:12
shoulder
168:5
show
107:2
149:7
showed
171:2
shown
149:1
shows
107:1
sign
27:18
40:20
48:20
49:13
71:9
72:19
73:1
102:15
105:1
117:1
signature
154:6
signatures
82:11
signed
47:13
49:12
54:23
65:19
66:3,4,5,
7,13
71:6,18
72:22
103:10
104:1,4,
10,13
105:8
111:5,17
significanc
e
72:11
significant
56:3
158:18
significant
ly
74:19
signing
18:19
72:20
103:7,18
117:5
118:10
similar
88:19
157:19
simple
95:5
simply
95:23
single
21:13
44:8 46:7
51:10
138:22
situation
24:23
33:1,3,7
70:17
87:14
112:16
situations
102:18
slang
22:4
slightly
61:16
software
11:8
solely
34:5
67:19
SOPS
89:19
sort
7:7 8:22
14:17,19
19:6
20:18
21:6 35:9
40:21
42:14,15,
22 44:21
71:20
83:21
88:22
110:19
115:16
134:7
143:21
152:11
sorts
8:12
13:23
21:20
35:16
44:16
117:3
170:1
SOUCY
6:7,14,
16,18,20,
22 60:1,
9,12,16
80:17,20,
21 81:17
82:2
116:1,4,5
141:21
148:1,6,
10,12,17,
21 149:1,
10,15,22,
23 154:2,
12 170:9
171:8,11,
12
172:12,19
181:12
sound
116:17
163:9
167:18
speak
26:16
56:15
59:18
88:23
129:13
156:21
speaking
38:4,5
102:22
156:15
158:6
speaks
41:22
160:1
special
15:14,20
16:12
35:5
special-
purpose
15:10,21
16:10,11
17:14
121:6
specific
85:6
149:9
154:21
157:10
specificall
y
18:5 28:4
30:10
32:14
34:14
40:1 44:6
55:12
66:16
75:5 77:6
82:16
91:6 97:4
128:19
130:7
139:5
151:11
157:13
159:19
167:16
168:23
176:16
speculate
73:19
98:3
spell
6:11 7:1
spend
67:23
68:2
spending
67:3,4
split
173:10
spoke
156:7,14
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: shaded..spoke
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
158:20
spoken
74:16
156:16
staff
109:3
stage
83:9
161:9
stand
129:19
standard
89:17
90:1,14
standing
74:6
start
20:20
88:6
138:8,9
175:21
started
32:7 57:1
76:20,23
110:4
136:17,22
139:15
140:5
180:2
starting
138:4
starts
61:17
state
6:10,23
12:23
13:18
30:20
94:10
119:5
148:19
161:15
175:2
stated
7:11 9:3,
8 39:2
40:3
42:21
46:22
49:10
50:17
73:2,23
74:23
81:20
86:7
94:17
96:2 98:6
125:5,20
136:6
140:16
150:7
157:23
159:16
171:17
174:14
statement
41:9
73:21
74:6,18,
20 81:21
88:13,18,
19 89:6,8
105:21
107:10
161:8
162:1
167:3
171:19
statements
38:13
106:21
107:13,
19,21
108:4,5
126:7
160:8
states
62:4
76:11
83:11
stating
74:12
status
56:22
57:2,4
statutes
18:1
staunchly
43:16
stay
104:17
stenographe
r
7:13 8:3
stenographe
r's
7:17
step
42:14
46:21
70:15
152:10
stepped
45:16
stern
45:5
Steve
54:22
73:21
75:23
76:4 77:4
88:2,7,13
89:1 95:2
101:15,21
102:3
171:17
175:14
179:4
180:7,12,
20
sticker
96:16
121:23
153:21
sticks
75:6
stips
6:16
stipulate
60:10
Stipulation
s
6:15
stood
46:4
stopping
10:8
strange
97:4
stress
175:2
string
75:10
122:11
studies
11:18
stuff
133:14
subject
63:13
70:1
105:5,23
155:1
submission
79:23
87:8,10
submit
151:9
submits
81:10
submitted
79:17,20,
22 80:2,
5,11,23
82:6,8
87:1
111:8,22
112:1
129:20
submitting
151:4
substance
88:20
149:4
154:10
substantive
126:7
subtracted
106:9
sudden
137:10
suggested
135:17
suggesting
179:15
suit
52:2
sum
157:14
summary
11:15
20:19
30:2
35:18
38:13
81:15
116:13
121:20
130:16
147:23
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: spoken..summary
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
148:3,15,
16,19
149:12,20
170:7
171:16
172:10,17
181:15
summer
12:9
128:9,11
Sunday
103:12
Sundays
103:18
superbly
9:14
supervision
18:12
supplied
21:9
supplier
26:13
suppliers
27:12
supplies
20:16
24:1
supply
135:11
supplying
23:23
support
94:12
supported
129:3
suppose
149:18
supposed
25:14
56:7
surfaced
110:6
surprised
171:4
surprising
81:17
surrounding
136:20,23
suspend
181:14
suspended
181:19
switching
115:22
sworn
6:3
system
16:23
25:18
150:13
systematica
lly
168:14
T
table
60:18
tail
110:4
taking
13:8 21:8
49:8
88:15,21
168:11
180:6
talk
7:18 79:7
138:14
140:8
161:22
talked
106:13
145:2
156:1
159:4
179:15
talking
33:2
106:19
112:12
123:6
136:1
142:15,16
155:18
175:21
176:13
tangible
165:12
tax
30:5
31:5,22
32:3
35:23
48:8,11
56:13,19
57:3 58:1
63:11
65:15
76:11,18
77:3,5,11
88:15
91:21
92:9,12,
14 93:22
94:6,8,
10,11
96:4
98:16
99:1,2
105:10
109:12,
13,18
110:16
114:6,15,
19,21,22
121:2,10
123:5,13,
21 124:3,
18 125:3
134:4,8,
10,16,22,
23 136:4,
9 145:3,
10,12,20
146:4
152:1
162:5
175:4,16,
17 176:6
177:7,22
178:13
taxes
63:15,19
64:17
technically
112:15
technology
165:11
telephone
93:16,18
telling
134:20
139:7
tend
8:12
tenure
20:9
term
64:6
terminate
95:6,21,
23 118:14
119:4,23
terminating
117:7,13
118:9,10
126:12
128:16
testified
6:4 65:5
176:2
testimony
14:11,20,
22 15:2
text
74:17
150:11
152:13
172:13
173:8,21
174:2,7,
10,23
175:6,10
178:20
180:3
texting
175:13
texts
178:23
thereto
81:16
thing
8:6 10:5
20:18
21:13,17
22:9
32:11
44:22
77:13
83:21
95:10
135:21
139:14
161:11
179:5
things
8:12 14:1
18:21
19:6,8
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: summer..things
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
20:1
21:21
22:6,7
28:1,4
35:17
40:21
44:16
52:19,20
53:7,9,
10,13
54:11
59:16
63:10,12,
14 69:22
91:5 95:9
101:19
105:5
106:9
113:15
114:20
117:3
127:20
135:17,21
136:21
143:9
144:14
149:17
157:3
158:18
170:16,18
thinking
9:14
23:23
43:11
thirds
61:14
thorny
53:2
thought
73:20
84:20
95:5 97:4
thoughts
88:6
throw
64:6
Thursday
146:15,18
tied
7:17
48:16,19
81:20
101:4
109:20,22
110:7
time
9:12
10:3,4
11:16
12:11
13:5
35:1,9
36:21
38:6
43:11
45:15,23
55:19
56:3
62:14
64:23
76:5 85:8
90:2 96:1
98:1,13
99:6
103:13
107:1
110:3
115:23
116:12
125:13
126:1
129:5
130:2
143:9,10
145:11,
13,14,23
147:11
164:18
165:3,22
167:20,22
168:8,19
169:5,11,
15,19
170:20
176:15,20
177:13
179:10
180:18
181:5
time-
sensitive
97:1
timeline
115:17
146:5
times
24:3 26:3
28:1 78:1
150:19
165:11
title
10:19
11:6
147:13
today
14:12
28:12
40:4 48:5
50:17
56:12
65:5
132:14
133:5
150:7
told
85:7
164:6
167:16
181:9
tone
138:12
144:13,16
145:4,8
top
62:4,10
69:1
122:7
154:4,8
175:5
topic
43:13
topics
174:4
total
11:12
157:15
town
10:13,14,
23 14:23
15:8,16,
21,22,23
16:3,5,22
17:3,4,5,
6,8,12,
13,17,21
18:3,7,9,
12,15,16,
17,21
19:11,15,
22 20:7,
9,10,14,
15,17,18
21:7,9,
11,17
22:2,3,8,
22 23:5,
12,13,14,
17 24:6,7
25:1,4,8,
23 26:12,
14,16,17
27:8,11,
13,15,17,
18 28:13
29:12,19
31:1,5,
16,19
32:1,8,
13,16,17,
19 33:15,
19 35:14,
17,21
36:3
37:7,23
43:9
45:11
46:6,23
47:10,13
48:10,15,
17 49:20,
23 50:1
51:13,23
52:19
53:4,12,
20 54:10,
16,19
55:12
56:13,22,
23 58:15,
19 59:12,
17 60:6,
13 62:9
64:2,8,
15,22
65:15
66:3,8,
13,22
67:12,18,
23 68:3,
17,19
69:6
70:6,19
71:4,9
72:7,8,21
76:15,19
77:7,17,
21 79:7,
20,22
80:2,10,
12,23
81:9
82:6,8,
13,16
83:2,3
84:1,8,
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: thinking..town
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
12,16
85:18,22,
23 86:2,
3,10,16,
23 87:11
88:21
89:16
90:3,5
91:11
92:3 96:3
97:10
99:17
101:1
102:15,23
103:2,10,
19 104:9,
10,13,14,
20 105:20
106:14,22
107:3,15,
22 108:10
109:7,11,
21 110:3,
11,14,21
111:9,10
113:18,
20,23
116:11,19
117:8
118:1,6,
7,10,14,
16,23
119:7,11,
19,23
121:3,7,
8,12,15
124:2,12,
23 126:13
127:16
129:19,21
130:8
131:15
133:12,
15,19,21
134:1,4
135:7,11,
18 136:9,
11,12
138:18
139:4,11,
20 140:2,
11,20
141:12
142:17
143:6,22
144:7
148:6
150:8,9,
10,11
156:12
158:4,5,
7,10
159:2
160:5,12
161:4,5,
18,20,21
164:22
166:3,18
167:15
168:15,16
169:3,8
171:20
173:17
176:4
town's
68:9,16
86:5
94:8,11
114:21
121:20
123:13
130:16
171:16
towns
67:14
83:1
137:23
160:22
161:3
training
13:6,8
transcend
16:15
transcribed
7:21 8:7
transcript
9:3
transfer
40:7
42:13
transferrin
g
42:12
transmitted
150:17
transparent
68:14
Transportat
ion
11:4,13
treat
138:8
treatment
16:22
trouble
177:10
true
54:6
106:10
150:14,15
Tucker
28:16,21
Tuesday
123:3
175:16
two-page
60:18
122:3
154:13
type
119:17,20
176:1
typed
6:9 154:7
types
22:6 24:5
142:21
165:11
169:21
typical
59:11
typically
19:7 21:6
35:13,15
62:10,11
120:17
143:12
U
uh-huh
10:2 27:3
61:3
111:6
123:7
129:18
150:6
175:19
uh-uh
61:6
ultimate
88:8
ultimately
100:13
153:10
uncommon
9:12
106:8
understand
9:10,15,
18 28:17
30:1
33:5,6
36:9 39:7
40:3
42:7,23
49:5
50:11
52:7
70:16
91:8 98:9
99:18
123:16
135:3
160:17
161:14
168:4
understandi
ng
17:20
30:3,6,
10,14,16,
23 33:18
34:2
36:12,18
37:7,15,
17,22,23
39:8,18
41:8,11,
15,16
42:7,17
50:2,18
53:18
54:7
55:20
58:19
63:6,9
64:12,18
65:6
70:23
73:7,15
86:5
95:2,3
97:7,14
98:7,8
101:11
104:5
112:4
113:15
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: town's..understanding
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
116:20
117:1
121:1
129:11
135:3,5
152:11
156:5
177:13
178:11,
12,14
179:11,12
understood
10:1 39:2
71:13
95:8
108:15
168:10
170:3
University
11:18,20
unnecessary
145:5,8
unpack
91:12
168:1
unpaid
129:22
unsealed
38:22
unusual
106:2
updates
20:3,6
usual
6:16
utility
98:20
99:8
V
valid
87:2
variety
95:3,9
157:3
vehicle
64:9,15,
16,21
vendor
20:23
23:23
26:13
vendors
20:16
21:8
27:12
vent
125:17
verbal
8:9
verbatim
6:10 8:7
83:10
verificatio
n
26:4
verified
25:12
verifies
82:11
verify
174:22
verifying
26:5,6,7,
21
Vermont
11:4,13,
17
vice
76:8 87:3
video-
recorded
8:7
Village
15:13
16:21
34:18
35:4 36:6
54:1,11,
22 57:11
59:13
101:23
103:8
114:4,8,
14 124:6
visit
156:23
vital
165:3
vitally
164:21
volume
154:10
vote
42:4,6
83:23
85:18
89:8
171:20
177:8,15
178:15
voted
40:5
66:23
72:18
119:14,21
171:18,21
177:6,21
voters
82:12
141:15
154:5
voting
177:14
W
wages
18:19
wait
8:2
waive
37:10
41:13
44:1,15
45:7
46:16
47:4 91:9
117:2
179:21
waived
51:15
waiver
31:22
32:5
71:4,9,
11,15,17
72:16
96:1
179:20
waivers
37:22
40:20
walk
8:18 42:1
wanted
28:3 40:1
44:8,9
49:2,4
52:3
70:12,22
98:10,13
118:13
127:2
134:21
135:17
164:2
172:15
177:17
wanting
49:21
86:22
100:23
168:12
Warmington
125:19
133:8
179:14
warned
34:5
89:22
119:13
120:2,5
141:12
177:9,19
181:4
warrant
78:7,8,13
79:15
80:1,22
81:10
82:5,8
83:11
84:5,22
85:21
87:15
110:8
111:8,22
112:2
141:3
142:9,18
143:3
148:5
150:9
152:13,18
155:1
157:17
160:19
163:6
166:6
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: understood..warrant
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
167:1
watching
138:3
water
16:9,10,
12
ways
133:23
136:10
139:19
140:11
151:3
web
90:4
website
68:9,16
83:4,8
90:4
week
19:23
141:1
145:18,22
164:11
169:10
170:14
weeks
92:12
weird
139:14
181:5
Western
11:19
whichever
159:6
whip
162:14
Williams
101:22
165:21,22
win
172:2,3
winter
12:3
witnessed
102:12
wondering
34:23
Woodsum
32:3
69:12,18
70:9,18
71:3,19
72:16,21
92:4,5,9,
17 93:14
94:15
95:23
96:11,12,
20,21
97:1
121:8,16
123:10,
16,18
124:1,4,
9,13
126:4,15,
19,23
134:2
135:14,
19,20
136:15
155:19
156:4
158:13
175:22
176:3
Woodsum's
159:8
Woodsville
15:13
16:21
30:12
33:17
34:16,17,
18 35:4,5
36:6
37:3,12
38:17
39:11,17
40:23
41:15
42:11
46:3,9,17
47:8,21
48:7,15,
20 49:9,
11 50:4,
7,22
51:3,19
52:10
53:21,23
54:11
56:16
57:11
58:17,22
59:13
62:2
63:4,12
64:3,7,9,
14,15,22
65:2,9,
11,12,14,
16 66:9
67:13
68:5
76:15
77:7
101:7,8,
23 102:4,
5,6,9,14,
19,20,22
103:8,12,
21
106:11,20
109:14,21
110:20
111:9
112:3,8
113:19
114:3,8,
14,20
115:1,11
116:11,
15,17,23
117:11
124:5,6
142:10,15
143:4,6
160:8,23
163:2
Woodsville'
s
56:22
110:10,15
Woodsville-
related
69:15
132:4
word
26:3
41:23
45:4
83:10,12
127:3
134:2
worded
9:13
83:18
145:1
167:18
176:2,5
words
45:17
107:14
work
10:13
11:3
19:21
20:17
22:11
23:7,10
24:3,8,21
25:3
29:12,18
30:15
32:7
52:17
53:11
54:17
93:9
103:1
106:14
107:3,8
113:22
118:19
124:17
132:16,
18,22
133:1,10,
17
134:16,
21,22
135:6
138:20
139:21
151:23
173:17,
18,19
worked
11:4 17:5
21:10
31:4
44:20
99:6
155:23
working
22:14,15
31:16,19
32:2
91:18,23
92:2,3,8,
11,19
99:2
109:13
113:17
123:17
126:3
132:23
135:14
136:9
158:12,14
181:5
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: watching..working
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
works
17:6,7
102:6
workshop
23:3
169:9
write
144:20
145:1
177:12
181:8
writes
88:7
writing
43:1,4
82:4
180:17
181:2
written
81:6 93:8
94:15
144:16,18
159:8
168:3
wrong
77:17
wrote
116:14
161:13
Y
year
10:17
11:11
12:1,2
23:6
24:2,3
77:22
89:16
128:6
156:12
171:3
years
11:5,12,
13 40:13
84:16
162:13
yesterday
170:13
yup
6:18,20
8:5 34:22
44:23
76:13
79:12
81:5
82:10
120:5
125:13
147:4,7
148:21
151:6
155:10
175:23
BRIGITTE CODLING
Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella
May 20, 2024
Index: works..yup
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com

Former Haverhill Town Manager Brigitte Codling Affidavit

  • 1.
    In the MatterOf: Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella 215-2023-CV-00241 BRIGITTE CODLING May 20, 2024
  • 2.
    · · ·· · · · STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE GRAFTON, SS.· · · · · · · · · · ·SUPERIOR COURT TOWN OF HAVERHILL· · · ) · · · · · · · · · · · ·) · ·VS.· · · · · · · · ·)· · · · ·DOCKET NO.: · · · · · · · · · · · ·)· · · · ·215-2023-CV-00241 DONAHUE, TUCKER &· · · ) CIANDELLA, PLLC· · · · ) · · · · · DEPOSITION OF BRIGITTE CODLING · ·Deposition taken at the Robert E. Clifford · ·Memorial Building, 65 South Court Street, · ·Woodsville, New Hampshire, on Monday, May 20, · ·2024, commencing at 9:10 a.m. · ·Court Reporter: · ·Dawn L. Griffin-Smith, LCR · ·New Hampshire LCR #108 (RSA 310-A:161-181) BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 1 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 3.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · · · · · ·APPEARANCES ·2 ·3· ·Representing the Plaintiff: ·4· · · · · · DEREK E. KLINE · · · · · · · P.O. Box 1577 ·5· · · · · · Center Harbor, NH· 03226 · · · · · · · By:· Derek E. Kline, Esq. ·6· · · · · · · · ·(603) 707-1721 · · · · · · · · · ·derekekline@gmail.com ·7 ·8 ·9· ·Representing the Defendants: 10· · · · · · GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI · · · · · · · 66 Hanover Street 11· · · · · · Manchester, NH· 03101 · · · · · · · By:· James L. Soucy, Esq. 12· · · · · · · · ·(603) 782-0408 · · · · · · · · · ·jsoucy@grsm.com 13 14 15· ·Representing the Deponent: 16· · · · · · LEHMANN MAJOR LIST · · · · · · · 6 Garvins Falls Road 17· · · · · · Concord, NH· 03301 · · · · · · · By:· Richard J. Lehmann, Esq. 18· · · · · · · · ·(603)731-5435 · · · · · · · · · ·rick@nhlawyer.com 19 20· ·Also Present: Roderick O'Shana 21 22 23 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 2 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 4.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · · · · · STIPULATIONS ·2 ·3· · · · ·It is agreed that the deposition shall be taken ·4· ·in the first instance in stenotype and when transcribed ·5· ·may be used for all purposes for which depositions are ·6· ·competent under New Hampshire practice. ·7 ·8· · · · ·Notice, filing, caption and all other formalities ·9· ·are waived.· All objections except as to form are 10· ·reserved and may be taken in court at time of trial. 11 12· · · · ·It is further agreed that if the deposition is 13· ·not signed within 30 days, the signature of the 14· ·deponent is waived. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 3 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 5.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · · · · · · I N D E X ·2 ·3 ·4· · · ·WITNESS: ·5· · · · ·BRIGITTE CODLING ·6 ·7· · · ·EXAMINATION:· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Page ·8 ·9· · · · ·By Mr. Soucy· ·. . . . . . . . . . .· · · 6 10 11 12· · · ·EXHIBITS FOR IDENTIFICATION: 13· · · · ·CODLING· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Page 14· ·Exhibit 1· · ·Town of Haverhill Nonpublic · · · · · · · · · ·Meeting Minutes 3/6/20 15· · · · · · · · ·(Knapp Exhibit 6)· · · · · · · · ·60 16· ·Exhibit 2· · ·Town of Haverhill Meeting · · · · · · · · · ·Minutes 1/9/22· · · · · · · · · · 68 17 · · ·Exhibit 3· · ·5/15/24 Email 18· · · · · · · · ·(Knapp Exhibit 21)· · · · · · · · 75 19· ·Exhibit 4· · ·1/13/23 Email· · · · · · · · · · 122 20· ·Exhibit 5· · ·7/12/23 Email· · · · · · · · · · 130 21· ·Exhibit 6· · ·1/27/22 Email· · · · · · · · · · 146 22· ·Exhibit 7· · ·1/31/22 Email· · · · · · · · · · 153 23· ·Exhibit 8· · ·2/2/22 Email· · · · · · · · · · ·155 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 4 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 6.
    ·1· · ··EXHIBITS FOR IDENTIFICATION CONT.: ·2· · · · ·CODLING· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Page ·3· ·Exhibit 9· · ·1/6/23 Email · · · · · · · · · ·(Knapp Exhibit 2)· · · · · · · · 165 ·4 · · ·Exhibit 10· · Text Messages· · · · · · · · · · 172 ·5 · · ·Exhibit 11· · Text Messages cont.· · · · · · · 174 ·6 ·7 ·8 · · · ·(Original exhibits retained by court reporter and ·9· · ·returned to Attorney Soucy.· Scanned copies provided · · · ·to all counsel.) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 5 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 7.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · · · P R O C E E D I N G S ·2· · · · · · · · · · · BRIGITTE CODLING, ·3· · · · having been duly sworn by the Court Reporter, ·4· · · · · · was deposed and testified as follows: ·5· · · · · · · · · · · · ************* ·6· · · · · · · · · · · · ·EXAMINATION ·7· ·BY MR. SOUCY: ·8· ·Q.· Okay.· So now that we are on the record, everything ·9· · · ·that we are, each of us are saying is being typed 10· · · ·out in shorthand verbatim, so I will have you state 11· · · ·for the record and spell your last name, your full 12· · · ·name, please. 13· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Jim? 14· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Yeah? 15· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Stipulations? 16· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· We can have the usual stips. 17· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· All objections are preserved. 18· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Yup. 19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Except as to form? 20· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Form.· Yup.· All set? 21· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Yes. 22· ·BY MR. SOUCY: 23· ·Q.· Yes, so could you please state your full name, BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 6 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 8.
    ·1· · ··spell your last name? ·2· ·A.· Brigitte Codling.· Last name, C-O-D-L-I-N-G. ·3· ·Q.· Ms. Codling, have you ever had your deposition ·4· · · ·taken before? ·5· ·A.· No. ·6· ·Q.· Okay.· So given the fact this is a first-time event ·7· · · ·for you, I'll just go over sort of the ground ·8· · · ·rules.· I'm going to presume that your attorney has ·9· · · ·gone over some or all of them, but just so that we 10· · · ·cover them here in the moment. 11· · · · · · · · ·As I stated, everything that all of us 12· · · ·say is going to be recorded in shorthand initially 13· · · ·by the stenographer here.· And I'm going to be 14· · · ·asking you questions.· You can give your full 15· · · ·answer to them. 16· · · · · · · · ·While I'm asking the question, so that we 17· · · ·don't get the stenographer's fingers all tied in 18· · · ·knots, we'll try not to talk over each other.· Even 19· · · ·though you may be able to anticipate or expect 20· · · ·where the question is going like we do in normal 21· · · ·conversations, because this is being transcribed I 22· · · ·will ask you to try to keep that in mind. 23· · · · · · · · ·And, again, even though you may BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 7 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 9.
    ·1· · ··anticipate where the question is going and what I'm ·2· · · ·getting at, please try to wait for the question in ·3· · · ·consideration for the stenographer.· And then once ·4· · · ·I'm done, you can give your full answer, okay? ·5· ·A.· Yup.· Yes. ·6· ·Q.· Okay.· The second thing is because this is not ·7· · · ·being video-recorded but only verbatim transcribed, ·8· · · ·I'll ask you that when you're giving your answers, ·9· · · ·first and foremost you provide a verbal response to 10· · · ·your question, and it's in conversation 11· · · ·affirmation, shaking your head, nodding your head, 12· · · ·those sorts of things we tend to do out of habit, 13· · · ·and so with respect to your responses please give 14· · · ·them in an audible manner. 15· · · · · · · · ·And then in addition, I don't see that 16· · · ·there will be, but in the event that there is a 17· · · ·question, for instance, where I ask you, Where did 18· · · ·you walk?· And you say, Well, over there.· Well, 19· · · ·everybody in the room can see you point to the 20· · · ·right or to the left.· In the printed format that 21· · · ·doesn't come out so well.· So when you do give an 22· · · ·answer that provides some sort of direction, I will 23· · · ·ask you to try to remember -- we'll probably remind BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 8 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 10.
    ·1· · ··you -- but try to remember to say to the right or ·2· · · ·to the left or something that when you're reading ·3· · · ·the transcript of what you've stated, it'll be ·4· · · ·clear to anybody who reads it; is that clear? ·5· ·A.· Yes. ·6· ·Q.· Okay.· Probably most important is when I ask you a ·7· · · ·question, if there is a question or something that ·8· · · ·I have said or stated is not clear to you, please ·9· · · ·don't presume that you're the only one in the room 10· · · ·who doesn't understand what the heck the attorney 11· · · ·is saying -- attorneys ask poor questions -- I 12· · · ·won't say all the time, but it's not uncommon for 13· · · ·an attorney to ask a poorly worded question 14· · · ·thinking that we asked it superbly. 15· · · · · · · · ·So if you don't understand a question, 16· · · ·please let me know.· I will either restate it or 17· · · ·phrase it in a different way so that you do 18· · · ·understand, okay? 19· ·A.· Yes. 20· ·Q.· Okay.· In connection with that, after I ask you a 21· · · ·question and you begin to and fully give your 22· · · ·answer, we're going to be allowed to presume that 23· · · ·you're giving your answer to the question that's BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 9 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 11.
    ·1· · ··asked because you've understood it, okay? ·2· ·A.· Uh-huh.· Yes. ·3· ·Q.· If at any point in time, not knowing how long we ·4· · · ·are going to be, but if at any point in time you ·5· · · ·need to take a break, just the only thing that I'm ·6· · · ·going to ask is that when there's a question that's ·7· · · ·been posed, that you provide your answer to it so ·8· · · ·we have a clean end point or stopping point on the ·9· · · ·record, okay? 10· ·A.· Yes. 11· ·Q.· Okay.· Currently what is your employment?· What do 12· · · ·you do? 13· ·A.· I work for the Town of Haverhill, New Hampshire, as 14· · · ·the town administrator. 15· ·Q.· And how long have you been in that particular 16· · · ·position? 17· ·A.· Since April 8th of this year. 18· ·Q.· 2014; correct?· Sorry, '24. 19· ·A.· '24.· With change of government my title changed on 20· · · ·that date. 21· ·Q.· And prior to April, sorry April 8th of 2024, how 22· · · ·were you employed? 23· ·A.· I was the town manager for the Town of Haverhill, BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 10 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 12.
    ·1· · ··New Hampshire, since April 23rd of 2019. ·2· ·Q.· And prior to April 3rd of 2019, what did you do for ·3· · · ·work? ·4· ·A.· I worked for the Vermont Agency of Transportation ·5· · · ·for nearly 20 years. ·6· ·Q.· What was your most recent position or job title ·7· · · ·with them? ·8· ·A.· Contract manager for the CMS software replacement ·9· · · ·project. 10· ·Q.· About how long were you in that role or position? 11· ·A.· About a year. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· Total about 20 years you said? 13· ·A.· 20 years with the Vermont Agency of Transportation. 14· ·Q.· Right.· And could you please provide us with a 15· · · ·summary of what you have for formal education going 16· · · ·back in time or reverse chronology? 17· ·A.· I have a bachelor's degree from the Vermont College 18· · · ·of Norwich University in architectural studies; and 19· · · ·I have a master's degree from the Western Governors 20· · · ·University in management and leadership. 21· ·Q.· When did you receive or obtain that master's 22· · · ·degree? 23· ·A.· January of 2020, around there. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 11 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 13.
    ·1· ·Q.· Areyou certain of the year? ·2· ·A.· It might have been December of the previous year. ·3· · · ·It was in the, over the winter, around Christmas, ·4· · · ·that I finally finished that degree. ·5· ·Q.· So you finished the coursework, then, in, towards ·6· · · ·the end of 2019? ·7· ·A.· I believe so. ·8· ·Q.· And then were awarded or conferred a degree ·9· · · ·sometime in the summer of 2020? 10· ·A.· I think it was in January, but I could be 11· · · ·misremembering that.· It was around that time 12· · · ·frame.· They mailed our diploma. 13· ·Q.· Okay.· And since completing that formal education 14· · · ·and course, have you taken any additional or any 15· · · ·other courses of any kind? 16· ·A.· I have a number of courses I have taken throughout 17· · · ·my career. 18· ·Q.· But since January of 2020? 19· ·A.· I am, I just received my certification as a 20· · · ·government finance officer. 21· ·Q.· And where did you take those courses through? 22· ·A.· Through the governors, sorry, the Government 23· · · ·Finance Officer's Association in the State of New BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 12 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 14.
    ·1· · ··Hampshire. ·2· ·Q.· Again, anything since January of 2020 as far as ·3· · · ·formal courses or education? ·4· ·A.· None that I can think of right now.· We take ·5· · · ·courses all of time, but nothing, it's just ·6· · · ·continuing education-type training. ·7· ·Q.· Okay.· What was the last continuing education ·8· · · ·training that you recall taking? ·9· ·A.· It would have been that government finance. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· And how regular, and so, so do you have any 11· · · ·licensing or certifications, outside of this 12· · · ·certified government finance officer do you have 13· · · ·any other licenses or certifications that you do 14· · · ·any kind of continuing education courses or take 15· · · ·credits for? 16· ·A.· None that I take continuing education credits for. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· You are not an attorney licensed to practice 18· · · ·in any state; correct? 19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 20· ·Q.· You can answer. 21· ·A.· No, I'm not an attorney. 22· ·Q.· Okay.· And you don't consider yourself an expert in 23· · · ·the analysis of legal conflicts or those sorts of BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 13 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 15.
    ·1· · ··things, do you? ·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·3· ·Q.· You can answer. ·4· ·A.· I don't think I'm an expert in legal, no. ·5· ·Q.· And you don't consider yourself an expert in ·6· · · ·connection with retention of attorneys or law firms ·7· · · ·in New Hampshire; correct? ·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·9· ·Q.· You can answer. 10· ·A.· I wouldn't consider myself an expert. 11· ·Q.· Okay.· Now, in the testimony that you're giving 12· · · ·here today, in what capacity are you providing 13· · · ·answers to these questions? 14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 15· ·Q.· You can answer. 16· ·A.· Can you rephrase what you ... 17· ·Q.· Yes.· I tried to ask the question sort of as a 18· · · ·reporter at, you know, an investigation or scene, 19· · · ·sort of who, what, when, where, how.· Are you 20· · · ·giving testimony based upon you as an individual 21· · · ·person being a resident of wherever it is that you 22· · · ·live; or are you giving testimony in your capacity 23· · · ·within the government or administration of the Town BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 14 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 16.
    ·1· · ··of Haverhill, New Hampshire? ·2· ·A.· I believe I'm here giving testimony related to my ·3· · · ·position. ·4· ·Q.· Okay.· And as a fact witness, meaning about events ·5· · · ·that you have direct experience from or of; ·6· · · ·correct? ·7· ·A.· Exactly, yes. ·8· ·Q.· Okay.· How many districts are there in the Town of ·9· · · ·Haverhill? 10· ·A.· There are four formal special-purpose districts. 11· ·Q.· And what are their names? 12· ·A.· There's Haverhill Corner, North Haverhill, Mountain 13· · · ·Lake, and the Village of Woodsville. 14· ·Q.· In addition to the special districts are there any 15· · · ·other distinctions or layers within the government 16· · · ·and the administration of the Town of Haverhill, 17· · · ·New Hampshire? 18· ·A.· Not layers of government, no. 19· ·Q.· Okay.· Are there anything that is distinct in 20· · · ·addition to these special districts, 21· · · ·special-purpose districts that is within the Town 22· · · ·of or about the Town of Haverhill? 23· ·A.· We have some common-name areas of town, such as BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 15 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 17.
    ·1· · ··Central Haverhill, Pike, and East Haverhill.· Those ·2· · · ·are not formal districts, but they are areas of ·3· · · ·town with common names. ·4· ·Q.· How many police departments are there within the ·5· · · ·Town of Haverhill? ·6· ·A.· One. ·7· ·Q.· Fire departments? ·8· ·A.· Two. ·9· ·Q.· Water and/or sewer departments? 10· ·A.· The four special-purpose districts offer water.· So 11· · · ·each of those special-purpose districts, one of 12· · · ·their special purposes is to provide water service 13· · · ·to their residents. 14· ·Q.· Self-contained unto themselves? 15· ·A.· Some of them are.· Some of them transcend over 16· · · ·their district boundaries with their service. 17· ·Q.· And what about any municipal services or service 18· · · ·areas with respect to sewer? 19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 20· ·Q.· You can answer. 21· ·A.· The Village of Woodsville offers sewer service as 22· · · ·well as sewer treatment; and the Town of Haverhill 23· · · ·has an out-of-district sewer system in North that BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 16 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 18.
    ·1· · ··services North Haverhill and areas of North ·2· · · ·Haverhill. ·3· ·Q.· And when there was a town manager form of ·4· · · ·government for the Town of Haverhill, can you ·5· · · ·explain who the town manager worked for? ·6· ·A.· Town manager works for the select board. ·7· ·Q.· And the select board works for and/or oversees the ·8· · · ·governance of the entire town of Haverhill? ·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 10· ·Q.· You can answer. 11· ·A.· The select board is a governing body. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· For the entire town? 13· ·A.· For the entire town. 14· ·Q.· And that includes the four special-purpose 15· · · ·districts? 16· ·A.· Yes. 17· ·Q.· While you were town manager what familiarity did 18· · · ·you have with your roles and your responsibilities 19· · · ·in that position? 20· ·A.· I think I had a very good understanding of my roles 21· · · ·and responsibilities as town manager. 22· ·Q.· Okay.· And what is there, going back now because 23· · · ·it's a prior form of governance, but what was there BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 17 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 19.
    ·1· · ··with respect to statutes that you were familiar ·2· · · ·with that provided guidance and authority with ·3· · · ·respect to the role of town manager in Haverhill, ·4· · · ·New Hampshire? ·5· ·A.· RSA 37 specifically. ·6· ·Q.· And RSA Chapter 37 prescribes in a general manner ·7· · · ·that the town manager is responsible to or ·8· · · ·answerable to which part of the government in the ·9· · · ·Town of Haverhill? 10· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 11· ·Q.· You can answer. 12· ·A.· The town manager is under the general supervision 13· · · ·of the select board. 14· ·Q.· Okay.· Generally what activities were you able to 15· · · ·do in your role while you served as town manager 16· · · ·for the Town of Haverhill? 17· ·A.· With, under a town manager form of government most 18· · · ·of the responsibilities of the day-to-day 19· · · ·operations:· Hiring, firing, setting wages, signing 20· · · ·contracts, executing contracts, was under the 21· · · ·purview of the town manager, among other things. 22· ·Q.· Fair to say generally employment and human resource 23· · · ·activities? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 18 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 20.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·2· ·Q.· You can answer. ·3· ·A.· Those were included, yes. ·4· ·Q.· Okay.· The hiring, the firing and setting, I don't ·5· · · ·want to say pay scales, but maybe hourly rates and ·6· · · ·those sort of things, those are something that are ·7· · · ·typically referred to as HR or employment-related ·8· · · ·kind of things; correct? ·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 10· ·Q.· You can answer. 11· ·A.· Yeah, HR and the management of people for the Town 12· · · ·of Haverhill was one of my responsibilities. 13· ·Q.· Okay.· Is it fair to say that you were, carried out 14· · · ·day-to-day activities, but the board of selectmen 15· · · ·reviewed what the town manager had done as far as 16· · · ·actions and decisions? 17· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 18· ·Q.· You can answer. 19· ·A.· The board would not review -- 20· ·Q.· Okay. 21· ·A.· -- my work.· I would report to them activities 22· · · ·within the town, the town, within my role as town 23· · · ·manager.· So every other week I would report to BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 19 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 21.
    ·1· · ··them things that had happened. ·2· ·Q.· Okay.· So that was on a periodic or regular basis ·3· · · ·as far as updates that you'd give the board of ·4· · · ·selectmen? ·5· ·A.· Yes. ·6· ·Q.· When and where would those updates occur that you ·7· · · ·would provide to the board of selectmen as town ·8· · · ·manager? ·9· ·A.· For most of my tenure as town manager I would offer 10· · · ·a biweekly town manager report, which I would give 11· · · ·at select board meetings. 12· ·Q.· At public meetings? 13· ·A.· Public meetings. 14· ·Q.· Generally what involvement as town manager did you 15· · · ·have in connection with contracts in which Town of 16· · · ·Haverhill would engage in for supplies for vendors, 17· · · ·for contractors, to do work, you know, on town 18· · · ·property, on town buildings, that sort of thing. 19· · · ·Very general question but can you give us a summary 20· · · ·to start? 21· ·A.· So it was my responsibility to determine when it 22· · · ·was needed for us to go out to bid RFPR 2 or seek a 23· · · ·new vendor or something along those lines.· So it BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 20 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 22.
    ·1· · ··was my responsibility to go out and do that kind of ·2· · · ·recruitment, do the bidding process, go through the ·3· · · ·bidding process, selection process, the contracting ·4· · · ·association and the execution of the contract. ·5· ·Q.· Who else or what other departments or roles would ·6· · · ·you typically engage or, sort of, bring into the ·7· · · ·process as far as your role as town manager and ·8· · · ·taking care of whatever buildings or vendors or ·9· · · ·materials needed to be supplied to the town? 10· ·A.· I worked directly with my department head. 11· ·Q.· Okay.· So the Town didn't expect you to be, I don't 12· · · ·want to say an expert, but knowledgeable in every 13· · · ·single thing that you did; correct? 14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 15· ·Q.· You can answer. 16· ·A.· So I don't think I was expected to be an expert in 17· · · ·every little thing that the Town did, but it was, I 18· · · ·believe, expected that I would hire individuals who 19· · · ·had expertise in various areas like maintenance, 20· · · ·highways and human resources, those sorts of 21· · · ·things.· So if I didn't know it, I was seeking 22· · · ·people who could assist in that role. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· And but -- thank you.· But in my, I think I BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 21 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 23.
    ·1· · ··was looking for and asking, the question was who ·2· · · ·else within either the governance of the town or ·3· · · ·the administration of the town would you reach out ·4· · · ·to, slang way of saying it, but also use as a ·5· · · ·resource if a roof needed to be put on, a furnace ·6· · · ·needed to be replaced.· Would those things, types ·7· · · ·of things, be what you would also be involved in as ·8· · · ·the town manager? ·9· ·A.· Those are thing I would definitely be involved in. 10· ·Q.· Okay. 11· ·A.· So, like I said, I would work with my department 12· · · ·heads.· For example, we have a head of maintenance, 13· · · ·so if there was a roof that needed to be replaced, 14· · · ·then I would be working with him, and together we 15· · · ·would be working towards building that project and 16· · · ·getting it out to bid and going through the 17· · · ·selection process and the contracting process 18· · · ·through execution of getting a new roof put on. 19· · · · · · · · ·I would also coordinate with the select 20· · · ·board with regards to funding on an annual basis of 21· · · ·projects coming, because it's the board that 22· · · ·approves the final budget that goes to town 23· · · ·meeting. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 22 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 24.
    ·1· ·Q.· Okay. ·2··A.· And so we would present our projects to the select ·3· · · ·board during budget workshop, and whatever made it ·4· · · ·into the budget got, and through the budget process ·5· · · ·of town meetings were projects we were able to ·6· · · ·execute the next year. ·7· ·Q.· And then on the, or during work being done by any ·8· · · ·company or contractor outside of the administration ·9· · · ·or governance of Haverhill, who would that, who 10· · · ·would be involved in seeing that work was actually 11· · · ·carried out and the products were actually provided 12· · · ·and delivered to the town, who was responsible for 13· · · ·that?· Was that the town manager's role as well? 14· ·A.· It was the town manager through the department 15· · · ·heads. 16· ·Q.· Generally would you be directly involved in that or 17· · · ·was that something that as town manager you were 18· · · ·able to rely on the department heads for the most 19· · · ·part? 20· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 21· ·Q.· You can answer. 22· ·A.· Can you rephrase what ... 23· ·Q.· Yeah, so I'm thinking of a vendor supplying BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 23 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 25.
    ·1· · ··products or materials or supplies over the course ·2· · · ·of the year and deliveries, picking them three or ·3· · · ·four times a year, or work being performed, you ·4· · · ·know, on a municipal building or something like ·5· · · ·that.· In a general sense those types of ·6· · · ·activities, did the Town expect or anticipate that ·7· · · ·the town manager would be, to use the phrase, ·8· · · ·"hands on" directly reviewing the work and the ·9· · · ·materials being delivered?· Or in general would you 10· · · ·be able to rely on the department heads for that? 11· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 12· ·Q.· You can answer. 13· ·A.· In a lot of cases I would rely on my department 14· · · ·heads to make sure that what was ordered was 15· · · ·delivered.· However, through the checks and 16· · · ·balances of financing something like that or paying 17· · · ·for something like that, then I would become aware 18· · · ·if the department heads didn't make me acutely 19· · · ·aware.· I was one of the layers of checking for 20· · · ·payments. 21· ·Q.· And as far as once those materials or that work was 22· · · ·completed or was in process, if it was a larger 23· · · ·kind of situation, what about as invoices were BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 24 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 26.
    ·1· · ··received by the Town, what was the town manager's ·2· · · ·role with respect to invoices coming in, again for ·3· · · ·either work performed, services provided, ·4· · · ·materials, what was the town manager's role on that ·5· · · ·phase of something? ·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·7· ·Q.· You can answer. ·8· ·A.· I'm, the town manager is one of the layers of ·9· · · ·checks and balances with regard to paying invoices. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· What are the other, quote/unquote, layers? 11· ·A.· So the invoices are coded by the department head. 12· · · ·It's reviewed and verified what's being paid for 13· · · ·was delivered, whether that's a service or a good. 14· · · · · · · · ·They are supposed to, what they do is 15· · · ·code those invoices against their budget lines, 16· · · ·because they are responsible for their budget. 17· · · ·That would then come into the bookkeeper, get 18· · · ·entered into the system. 19· · · · · · · · ·The bookkeeper then provides that to the 20· · · ·financial administrator for review.· Goes back to 21· · · ·the bookkeeper for any corrections.· Comes back to 22· · · ·the financial administrator for a check, and then 23· · · ·it comes to the town manager for a check and then BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 25 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 27.
    ·1· · ··it goes to the select board for a check and final ·2· · · ·approval. ·3· ·Q.· By the word, you used "check" a lot of times in ·4· · · ·that description.· You mean verification when -- ·5· ·A.· You're verifying, yes.· You're verifying that the ·6· · · ·proper codes were used; verifying that, you know, ·7· · · ·everything looks kosher.· Verifying, you know, if I ·8· · · ·had to go back to a department head and ask a ·9· · · ·question, that would be my opportunity to ask 10· · · ·something about the billing before it got finally 11· · · ·presented to the board for final approval. 12· ·Q.· And then who would authorize payment from the Town 13· · · ·funds to the vendor or the supplier, and by that I 14· · · ·mean was that, back when there was a town manager 15· · · ·form of government, the board of selectmen or the 16· · · ·town manager that checked that box, so to speak, so 17· · · ·funds would actually go out from the Town? 18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 19· ·Q.· You can answer. 20· ·A.· So originally it would be the department head 21· · · ·verifying and making payments. 22· ·Q.· Right. 23· ·A.· It would be my responsibility to make sure that BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 26 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 28.
    ·1· · ··that was all done according to our policies and ·2· · · ·procedures. ·3· ·Q.· Uh-huh. ·4· ·A.· But the board of selectmen is the final authority ·5· · · ·on the ability for us cutting checks. ·6· ·Q.· So then that isn't something, cutting checks, then, ·7· · · ·wasn't something that was within your activities or ·8· · · ·responsibilities as town manager then? ·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 10· ·Q.· You can answer. 11· ·A.· No.· As the town manager I can't cut checks. 12· ·Q.· And what about engaging either vendors, suppliers 13· · · ·or contractors, was that a decision that the town 14· · · ·manager made or was it the board of selectmen? 15· ·A.· The town manager. 16· ·Q.· What was there for process established for review 17· · · ·of any contract that the town manager was going to 18· · · ·sign or engage in on behalf of the Town, was there 19· · · ·any review set up or pre-approval by the board of 20· · · ·selectmen generally? 21· ·A.· No. 22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 23· ·Q.· You can answer. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 27 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 29.
    ·1· ·A.· No.·There were times where I would bring things to ·2· · · ·the select board that I felt needed their attention ·3· · · ·or I wanted their input in or I felt I needed it ·4· · · ·for some reason, specifically very political things ·5· · · ·I would bring to the select board. ·6· ·Q.· To run it past them, is the phrase, usually? ·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·8· ·Q.· You can answer. ·9· ·A.· Yeah. 10· ·Q.· Okay. 11· ·A.· Yeah. 12· ·Q.· Primarily we are here today, I'm here today to ask 13· · · ·you questions regarding the Town of Haverhill's 14· · · ·petition or complaint for declaratory judgment in 15· · · ·connection with the services that have been 16· · · ·allegedly provided by Donahue, Tucker and 17· · · ·Ciandella, you understand that; correct? 18· ·A.· Yes. 19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 20· ·A.· Yes. 21· ·Q.· With respect to the services that Donahue, Tucker 22· · · ·and Ciandella, and I will refer to them as DTC, the 23· · · ·three letters, D and T and C throughout.· If BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 28 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 30.
    ·1· · ··there's any confusion, you can just ask me, but is ·2· · · ·it okay just to say DTC for the law firm? ·3· ·A.· Yeah, that's fine with me. ·4· ·Q.· Okay.· So with respect to the lawsuit, have you or ·5· · · ·what have you read and reviewed with respect to the ·6· · · ·documents that have been filed in the court or with ·7· · · ·the court in connection with that lawsuit?· Have ·8· · · ·you reviewed any of those documents? ·9· ·A.· Most of them. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· So you're generally aware that DTC is 11· · · ·alleging that they provided legal services or legal 12· · · ·work to the Town at the request of the board of 13· · · ·selectmen; correct? 14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 15· ·Q.· You can answer. 16· ·A.· Can you say that again?· I'm sorry. 17· ·Q.· Yes.· You're aware that DTC is alleging that they 18· · · ·provided legal services or did legal work, you 19· · · ·know, for or on behalf of the Town at the request 20· · · ·of the board of selectmen, and they are seeking to 21· · · ·get paid for that.· That's generally what they are 22· · · ·alleging.· You're aware of that; correct? 23· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 29 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 31.
    ·1· ·A.· Iunderstand that's what they're alleging. ·2· ·Q.· Okay.· Can you please provide a summary of what ·3· · · ·your understanding is as to how DTC became involved ·4· · · ·in connection what in the documents filed with the ·5· · · ·court referred to as the DRA tax setting matter. ·6· · · ·What's your understanding as to how DTC got ·7· · · ·involved in that matter? ·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·9· ·Q.· You can answer. 10· ·A.· My understanding is that specifically Chris Hawkins 11· · · ·got involved because he had represented the 12· · · ·Woodsville Fire District, and some of the Haverhill 13· · · ·select board members knew him from that capacity. 14· ·Q.· Okay.· And what's your understanding of the, what 15· · · ·DTC did, what work they did?· What's your 16· · · ·understanding of what they are saying they did? 17· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 18· ·Q.· You can answer. 19· ·A.· What they are saying they did or what ... 20· ·Q.· Correct.· But what's your, I want to state it in 21· · · ·the form of not expecting or anticipating that you 22· · · ·know everything, right, so what's your 23· · · ·understanding of what they said they did for or on BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 30 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 32.
    ·1· · ··behalf of the Town in connection with that DRA rate ·2· · · ·setting issue? ·3· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·4· ·A.· Well, they say they worked with the board of ·5· · · ·selectmen to assist the Town in getting the tax ·6· · · ·rate set. ·7· ·Q.· Okay.· And what's your assessment with respect to ·8· · · ·their position or their allegations on what they ·9· · · ·did? 10· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 11· ·A.· My assessment? 12· ·Q.· Yes. 13· ·A.· That's what you're asking? 14· ·Q.· Yes. 15· ·A.· My assessment is that they were not, in fact, 16· · · ·working on behalf of the Town to do what they say 17· · · ·they were trying to do. 18· ·Q.· Okay.· And why do you think or believe that? 19· ·A.· That they were not working on behalf of the Town? 20· ·Q.· Correct. 21· ·A.· Well, one, we had, we had not gone through a 22· · · ·conflict waiver check to, throughout the entire tax 23· · · ·rate setting process there was no engagement BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 31 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 33.
    ·1· · ··letter, and they were not engaging with town ·2· · · ·administration at all; and we were already working ·3· · · ·with Drummond Woodsum Law Firm to get the tax rate ·4· · · ·set. ·5· ·Q.· Okay.· So with respect to the conflict waiver ·6· · · ·process, what would that have looked like back when ·7· · · ·DTC said that it started doing work for or on ·8· · · ·behalf of the Town? ·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 10· ·A.· Normally when we engage with attorneys, the first 11· · · ·thing we ask for is to do conflict checks. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· And who was "we"? 13· ·A.· Town administration. 14· ·Q.· Okay.· And who specifically back in, let's say 15· · · ·2022, who would that have been, meaning the, 16· · · ·quote/unquote, town administration? 17· ·A.· Myself or the assistant town manager. 18· ·Q.· Okay.· And does, based upon your knowledge and 19· · · ·information does the Town or would back in 2022, 20· · · ·did the board of selectmen have that power and 21· · · ·authority to engage in that process on its own? 22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 23· ·Q.· You can answer. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 32 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 34.
    ·1· ·A.· Theboard of select -- in a hypothetical situation? ·2· · · ·Are we talking hypothetical or in that particular ·3· · · ·situation? ·4· ·Q.· In the same set of facts that have played out as ·5· · · ·you understand them. ·6· ·A.· As far as I understand with regards to that ·7· · · ·situation they would not have. ·8· ·Q.· Okay.· What prohibited them from or would have ·9· · · ·prohibited them from engaging in that conflict 10· · · ·review process, as you put it? 11· ·A.· They could have engaged with me in that conflict 12· · · ·review process. 13· ·Q.· Okay. 14· ·A.· But what prohibited them from doing it on their own 15· · · ·was that the Board of Selectmen of the Town of 16· · · ·Haverhill had issued me full authority over all 17· · · ·matters related to the Woodsville Fire District. 18· ·Q.· Is it your understanding that when the Board of 19· · · ·Selectmen for the Town of Haverhill delegated that 20· · · ·activity or that role to you, that the board of 21· · · ·selectmen no longer had any power to do that 22· · · ·activity or engage in that activity any longer? 23· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 33 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 35.
    ·1· ·Q.· Youcan answer. ·2· ·A.· It was my understanding that it was my ·3· · · ·responsibility because they had given me that. ·4· · · ·They had officially and in an official capacity at ·5· · · ·a warned meeting issued me that authority solely. ·6· ·Q.· So in giving you or conveying that authority to ·7· · · ·you, the board of selectmen must have had that ·8· · · ·power or that role to give over to you; correct? ·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 10· ·Q.· You can answer. 11· ·A.· I think in general we shared, normally would have 12· · · ·shared the responsibility, though I was 13· · · ·historically the only one performing that function. 14· · · · · · · · ·And then they specifically handed over 15· · · ·all authority with related, with any legal matters 16· · · ·related to Woodsville Fire District to me. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· Is the Woodsville Fire District the same as 18· · · ·or interchangeable with the Woodsville Village 19· · · ·District? 20· ·A.· Yes. 21· ·Q.· Are the two of the same? 22· ·A.· Yup. 23· ·Q.· I have been wondering that for a heck of a long BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 34 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 36.
    ·1· · ··time, so I had to ask that. ·2· ·A.· Yes. ·3· ·Q.· Okay. ·4· ·A.· Woodsville Fire District, Woodsville Village ·5· · · ·District, Woodsville Special Purpose District, yes. ·6· ·Q.· Okay.· Same horse by a different name? ·7· ·A.· Yes. ·8· ·Q.· Okay.· So, again, we will try to keep our minds ·9· · · ·back in, say 2020 to 2022, some sort of narrow time 10· · · ·frame, not going back to the 1800s or something 11· · · ·like that. 12· ·A.· That's good. 13· ·Q.· So let's say 2022 or 2020, typically what occurred 14· · · ·in Town of Haverhill was that the town manager, 15· · · ·whoever was in that role, would typically or 16· · · ·generally review contracts and those sorts of 17· · · ·things for the Town, whatever the Town needed; is 18· · · ·that a fair summary? 19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 20· ·Q.· You can answer. 21· ·A.· Yes.· As town manager I had been responsible for 22· · · ·all contracts. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· With respect to this DRA tax setting issue, BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 35 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 37.
    ·1· · ··it's established in documents filed with the court ·2· · · ·that, I don't want to say you personally, but the ·3· · · ·town manager's position that board of selectmen had ·4· · · ·delegated the activity of handling the day-to-day ·5· · · ·administration of legal matters relating to ·6· · · ·Woodsville, but it's the Woodsville Village ·7· · · ·District; is that accurate? ·8· ·A.· Yes. ·9· ·Q.· Okay.· As, I'm trying to understand what you're 10· · · ·saying, what I think you're saying is when that 11· · · ·formal act occurred at a public meeting, what is 12· · · ·your understanding as to whether or not the board 13· · · ·of selectmen still had any power or authority to 14· · · ·still do those activities, again in connection with 15· · · ·the DRA rate setting issue? 16· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 17· ·Q.· You can answer. 18· ·A.· So it was my understanding that they no longer had 19· · · ·that authority. 20· ·Q.· Okay. 21· ·A.· They could have changed that at any time; they had 22· · · ·the power. 23· ·Q.· Right.· So when, do you recall what the date was BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 36 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 38.
    ·1· · ··when the board of selectmen assigned or gave that ·2· · · ·power to you, delegated that matter to you, as far ·3· · · ·as legal matters relating Woodsville; do you recall ·4· · · ·when that occurred? ·5· ·A.· I don't remember the exact date, but it's in the ·6· · · ·records. ·7· ·Q.· Okay.· Your understanding as town manager was that ·8· · · ·when that event occurred, that the board of ·9· · · ·selectmen no longer had any power to review 10· · · ·contracts, waive conflicts of interest or anything 11· · · ·like that, again, with respect to legal matters 12· · · ·relating to Woodsville; is that correct? 13· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 14· ·Q.· You can answer. 15· ·A.· It was my understanding that was the case and that 16· · · ·was also their intent. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· As far as your understanding that when they 18· · · ·delegated that activity or that role to you, that 19· · · ·the board of selectmen was left with no power to 20· · · ·continue doing those matters, contract review or 21· · · ·attorney retention review or conflict of interest 22· · · ·reviews and waivers, what is your understanding, as 23· · · ·town manager what's your understanding based upon? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 37 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 39.
    ·1· · ··Where did that come from? ·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·3· ·Q.· You can answer. ·4· ·A.· It comes from RSA 37.· It comes from speaking with ·5· · · ·other attorneys and speaking with my board of ·6· · · ·selectmen at the time that that was their intent. ·7· ·Q.· Do you know if the, their intent, meaning the board ·8· · · ·of selectmen's intent, is reflected in any minutes ·9· · · ·of the meetings from back then? 10· ·A.· Only in the motion that they made.· That motion is 11· · · ·documented.· The discussion took place in a 12· · · ·nonpublic session. 13· ·Q.· So what is there for statements or summary of the 14· · · ·board members' explanation of their intent to 15· · · ·convey all of their power and be left with nothing 16· · · ·with respect to the, you know, all matters, legal 17· · · ·matters relating to Woodsville? 18· ·A.· It would be -- 19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 20· ·Q.· You can answer. 21· ·A.· It would be in those nonpublic minutes, which I 22· · · ·don't believe have been unsealed yet or at all. 23· ·Q.· And then if it's not recorded in the minutes from BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 38 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 40.
    ·1· · ··those, that nonpublic session, then is it fair to ·2· · · ·say that it wasn't stated and not understood by the ·3· · · ·board members that that was the arrangement? ·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·5· ·Q.· You can answer. ·6· ·A.· I'm not sure what you're asking. ·7· ·Q.· If I understand what you're saying, your ·8· · · ·understanding is, is that when the board of ·9· · · ·selectmen assigned or delegated the role to you of 10· · · ·all matters, all legal matters relating to 11· · · ·Woodsville, when they conferred that responsibility 12· · · ·on to you, the board of selectmen was left with no 13· · · ·power or authority to do anything; is that correct? 14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 15· ·Q.· You can answer. 16· ·A.· Related to the legal matters related to the 17· · · ·Woodsville Fire District only. 18· ·Q.· Correct.· But that's, that's your understanding, 19· · · ·that once they assigned that or delegated that 20· · · ·responsibility and role to you, the board of 21· · · ·selectmen was left with no power or authority in 22· · · ·connection with that matter; correct? 23· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 39 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 41.
    ·1· ·A.· Specificallythey didn't want to be.· They wanted ·2· · · ·it to be me that took that role. ·3· ·Q.· Okay.· And then if I understand what you stated ·4· · · ·here today is that when the board of selectmen ·5· · · ·voted and made the motion and voted to give you or ·6· · · ·delegate to you that responsibility of that role, ·7· · · ·that their intent to transfer any and all power and ·8· · · ·authority that they had over to you is reflected in ·9· · · ·the minutes; is that correct? 10· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 11· ·Q.· You can answer. 12· ·A.· I would have to go back and look at the minutes. I 13· · · ·haven't looked at any of that in a couple of years. 14· ·Q.· Okay. 15· ·A.· So I can't say if it's reflected explicitly in the 16· · · ·minutes. 17· ·Q.· If it's not reflected in the minutes of that 18· · · ·nonpublic session that the board of selectmen 19· · · ·intended to delegate all of its power, all of its 20· · · ·authority to review contracts and sign waivers of 21· · · ·conflict of interest and all those sort of things 22· · · ·with respect to legal matters relating to 23· · · ·Woodsville, if it's not reflected in the minutes of BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 40 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 42.
    ·1· · ··that nonpublic session, would you agree that they ·2· · · ·didn't intend to delegate all of their power and ·3· · · ·authority? ·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·5· ·Q.· You can answer. ·6· ·A.· I wouldn't, I wouldn't say that. ·7· ·Q.· Okay.· Then how would you or how do you have the ·8· · · ·understanding, again if that there's no direct ·9· · · ·statement in those minutes from the nonpublic 10· · · ·session, how, then, would you have the 11· · · ·understanding that you do, that when the board of 12· · · ·selectmen delegated to you the authority and the 13· · · ·responsibility to review contracts and waive 14· · · ·conflicts of interest with legal matters relating 15· · · ·to Woodsville, where does that understanding or 16· · · ·where would that understanding come from? 17· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 18· ·Q.· You can answer. 19· ·A.· Well, I was there. 20· ·Q.· Okay. 21· ·A.· As was Jennifer Boucher.· And I think their motion 22· · · ·speaks pretty clearly too of their intent, because 23· · · ·it says to give all, the word "all" is used there. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 41 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 43.
    ·1· ·Q.· Nothaving been there I'm trying to walk myself ·2· · · ·through this, if you will.· So the board of ·3· · · ·selectmen, one way or another, whoever presented ·4· · · ·the idea, they discussed it, they took a vote, and ·5· · · ·then there are minutes of what they discussed and ·6· · · ·the outcome of the vote, obviously.· I'm trying to ·7· · · ·understand the basis of your understanding that ·8· · · ·when the board of selectmen assigned or delegated ·9· · · ·that role and the responsibility to you to make 10· · · ·decisions with respect to legal matter relating to 11· · · ·Woodsville, that the board knew they were 12· · · ·transferring everything over to you and they 13· · · ·intended to transfer, and they were left with 14· · · ·nothing.· That sort of that final step in my head 15· · · ·that I'm trying to sort out:· What, if anything, 16· · · ·more do you have that would explain your 17· · · ·understanding of that? 18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection to form.· Asked and 19· · · ·answered. 20· ·Q.· Do you have anything in addition to what you've 21· · · ·already stated now that I have explained a little 22· · · ·more of, sort of, the line of my questioning and 23· · · ·what I'm trying to understand? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 42 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 44.
    ·1· ·A.· Soare you asking do I have any more in writing or ·2· · · ·any more in general. ·3· ·Q.· Anything more anywhere in whatever form. ·4· ·A.· So in writing, like I said, I'd have to go back and ·5· · · ·look at the minutes to see exactly what notes the ·6· · · ·chair took at that meeting. ·7· ·Q.· Okay. ·8· ·A.· But the board members that made up that board are ·9· · · ·still in town and could certainly be brought in for 10· · · ·questioning if you want to know what they were 11· · · ·thinking at the time. 12· ·Q.· So they may or may not have something more to add 13· · · ·on that topic; correct? 14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 15· ·Q.· Yeah? 16· ·A.· I guarantee they would all come staunchly with the 17· · · ·same definitive information of what they intended. 18· ·Q.· Okay.· What, if anything, did the members who were 19· · · ·on the board of selectmen in 2022 when it appears 20· · · ·the events that gave rise to this lawsuit that we 21· · · ·are involved in right now, what, if anything, did 22· · · ·those members of that board have to say, if 23· · · ·anything, about whether they still had that power BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 43 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 45.
    ·1· · ··and authority to review contracts and waive ·2· · · ·conflicts of interest, what, if anything, did those ·3· · · ·members say? ·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·5· ·Q.· You can answer. ·6· ·A.· Specifically the board that made that motion did ·7· · · ·not want each of them to be acting independently, ·8· · · ·and they wanted there to be a single point of ·9· · · ·contact in decision-making, and they wanted that to 10· · · ·be me. 11· ·Q.· Okay.· And then in 2022 when the events occurred 12· · · ·that gave rise to this lawsuit, what did the 13· · · ·members of the board of selectmen say, if anything, 14· · · ·about whether or not the board of selectmen could 15· · · ·still review contracts and waive conflicts of 16· · · ·interest, those sorts of things? 17· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 18· ·Q.· You can answer. 19· ·A.· You mean the newly constituted board? 20· ·Q.· In two, who -- not having worked with them so I 21· · · ·know that there were elections and that sort of 22· · · ·thing -- 23· ·A.· Yup. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 44 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 46.
    ·1· ·Q.· --so the board members that existed and were on ·2· · · ·the board of selectmen in 2022, what, if anything, ·3· · · ·did they say about whether or not they believed ·4· · · ·they still had, I don't want to use the word ·5· · · ·"power" because it's a little bit too stern, but ·6· · · ·the authority or had the ability to review ·7· · · ·contracts and waive conflicts of interest? ·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·9· ·Q.· You can answer. 10· ·A.· So after March of 2022 when the new board was 11· · · ·constituted at the town meeting, this issue came up 12· · · ·again during a select board meeting, and Kevin 13· · · ·Knapp attempted to make a motion to remove 14· · · ·authority. 15· · · · · · · · ·At the time the select board chair 16· · · ·stepped in and said, I don't remember his exact 17· · · ·words, but basically, Brigitte has that authority. 18· · · ·We gave it to her for a reason.· She's the only 19· · · ·person that's going to, that should be doing this. 20· · · ·And Kevin's motion never got a second and the 21· · · ·motion failed. 22· · · · · · · · ·During some of those meetings at the 23· · · ·time, board members from the previous board who had BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 45 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 47.
    ·1· · ··originally made that motion for the intended ·2· · · ·purpose of giving me full authority over all legal ·3· · · ·matters related to the Woodsville Fire District ·4· · · ·also stood up at the select board meeting to ·5· · · ·express to Kevin Knapp that the intent was for the ·6· · · ·town manager to have that full authority and to be ·7· · · ·the single point of contact for decision-making and ·8· · · ·anything else related to legal matters related to ·9· · · ·Woodsville Fire District. 10· ·Q.· Okay. 11· ·A.· So they reiterated what they had done in another 12· · · ·public meeting. 13· ·Q.· Okay.· And who, if anybody, said that it was the 14· · · ·intent that the board of selectmen then would no 15· · · ·longer have any right or power to review any 16· · · ·contracts and waive any conflicts, again with 17· · · ·respect to legal matters related to Woodsville? 18· · · ·Who, if anybody, said that? 19· ·A.· The board of selectmen that made the motion and 20· · · ·authorized me to do so to have that authority. 21· ·Q.· So they, they in one step, then, they, the members 22· · · ·stated that they were delegating this authority and 23· · · ·the responsibility to the town manager, and that BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 46 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 48.
    ·1· · ··they were extinguish -- "they" meaning the members ·2· · · ·on the board of selectmen back then -- said that ·3· · · ·they were extinguishing or erasing their authority ·4· · · ·and power to review contracts and waive conflicts ·5· · · ·of interest; is that correct? ·6· ·A.· They were very explicit about that, yes. ·7· ·Q.· Okay. ·8· ·A.· Related to the Woodsville Fire District only. ·9· ·Q.· Correct.· So in, when this lawsuit that we are 10· · · ·involved in right now that the Town of Haverhill 11· · · ·brought against DTC, if that is accurate, then why 12· · · ·were, why weren't you the one or the individual for 13· · · ·the Town who signed the complaint or the petition 14· · · ·that got filed to the court to initiate this 15· · · ·lawsuit? 16· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 17· ·Q.· You can answer. 18· ·A.· Because it was an action the board of selectmen 19· · · ·took. 20· ·Q.· Does this lawsuit or what about this lawsuit 21· · · ·relates to legal matters relating to Woodsville? 22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 23· ·Q.· You can answer. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 47 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 49.
    ·1· ·A.· Sayit again. ·2· ·Q.· Yeah. ·3· ·A.· What about ... ·4· ·Q.· What about the present lawsuit that we are here ·5· · · ·today for involves the phrase that we have been ·6· · · ·using over and over again, legal matters relating ·7· · · ·to Woodsville? ·8· ·A.· Well, this lawsuit is about the tax rate setting ·9· · · ·matter and what DTC purports that they did to 10· · · ·assist the Town in that matter. 11· · · · · · · · ·And the tax rate setting matter was 12· · · ·directly connected to Articles 27 and 28, which was 13· · · ·directly connected to the legislation, which was 14· · · ·directly connected to the original lawsuit that 15· · · ·Woodsville filed against the Town of Haverhill. 16· · · ·They are all tied to one another, all about highway 17· · · ·funding.· The Town funding the district's 18· · · ·operation. 19· ·Q.· So if it's all tied to and relates to legal matters 20· · · ·relating to Woodsville, then why didn't you sign 21· · · ·the petition or the complaint that initiate this 22· · · ·lawsuit? 23· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 48 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 50.
    ·1· ·Q.· Youcan answer. ·2· ·A.· Because it was an action the select board wanted to ·3· · · ·take not -- yes, it's an action the select board ·4· · · ·wanted to make. ·5· ·Q.· Okay.· But if I understand what you were saying ·6· · · ·previously, when the board of selectmen assigned or ·7· · · ·delegated to you the role and the responsibility of ·8· · · ·making decisions and taking actions with respect to ·9· · · ·all legal matters relating to Woodsville, and your, 10· · · ·you just stated that this current lawsuit relates 11· · · ·to legal matters relating to Woodsville, the board 12· · · ·of selectmen couldn't have or wouldn't have signed 13· · · ·the petition.· So how did they sign the petition 14· · · ·then? 15· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 16· ·Q.· You can answer. 17· ·A.· Well, I think that this particular lawsuit is about 18· · · ·a bill. 19· ·Q.· Okay. 20· ·A.· And the bill has been filed with the Town from DTC. 21· · · ·And so for them it's about the bill and not wanting 22· · · ·to pay the bill because they believe that DTC was 23· · · ·never hired by the Town. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 49 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 51.
    ·1· ·Q.· Sowith your, with respect to your role as town ·2· · · ·manager and what your understanding is with respect ·3· · · ·to the delegation of the board of selectmen to you ·4· · · ·of all legal matters relating to Woodsville, does ·5· · · ·this current lawsuit then fall within the ·6· · · ·parameters or fall under that heading of all legal ·7· · · ·matters relating to Woodsville? ·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·9· ·Q.· You can answer. 10· ·A.· I'm not sure how to answer that. 11· ·Q.· Okay.· I just want to make sure, you understand the 12· · · ·question but you don't know the answer to it; is 13· · · ·that accurate? 14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 15· ·Q.· You can answer. 16· ·A.· Ask me the question again. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· So you've previously stated today that it's 18· · · ·your understanding and based upon what individual 19· · · ·members said with respect to the assignment of 20· · · ·making decisions and having authority and 21· · · ·responsibility with respect to all legal matters 22· · · ·relating to Woodsville, board of selectmen assigned 23· · · ·all of its power and authority over to you. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 50 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 52.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · ·And then with respect to this lawsuit I ·2· · · ·asked you if this present lawsuit relates to all ·3· · · ·legal matters relating to Woodsville, and I'm ·4· · · ·trying to find out if you would put this lawsuit ·5· · · ·under that heading of all legal matters -- ·6· ·A.· I personally would not. ·7· ·Q.· Okay. ·8· ·A.· Because from my perspective DTC was never hired. ·9· · · ·So from my perspective, this lawsuit is more about 10· · · ·the fact that this bill was filed with a single 11· · · ·select member at his personal address for legal 12· · · ·services they purported to have provided to this 13· · · ·town, but they were hired to do that. 14· · · · · · · · ·And they had, Chris Hawkins has such a 15· · · ·gross conflict it could never have been waived, so 16· · · ·they could never have been hired anyway. 17· ·Q.· Okay. 18· ·A.· So from my perspective, having full legal authority 19· · · ·over all matters related to Woodsville Fire 20· · · ·District, I certainly would never have hired Chris 21· · · ·Hawkins to serve us in this respect.· And so this 22· · · ·is like a separate matter.· This is between the 23· · · ·Town and DTC; and from that perspective it would be BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 51 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 53.
    ·1· · ··the board of selectmen who would be in a position ·2· · · ·of filing a suit if they felt that that was ·3· · · ·something that they wanted to do, which is what ·4· · · ·they did. ·5· ·Q.· Okay.· Let me ask, I don't want to say the same ·6· · · ·question, but let me ask a follow-up question based ·7· · · ·upon what I understand you just said. ·8· · · · · · · · ·So this present lawsuit does not, it does ·9· · · ·not relate to, is not connected to all, the quote, 10· · · ·all the legal matters relating to Woodsville, so it 11· · · ·doesn't fit or fall under that category; correct? 12· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 13· ·Q.· You can answer. 14· ·A.· I think it's -- no, I think.· It's been ... 15· ·Q.· It's outside of that. 16· ·A.· It's outside of that realm. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· Okay.· So with respect to the work or the 18· · · ·legal services that DTC says that it performed, the 19· · · ·things that it did on behalf of the Town, why did 20· · · ·DTC do the things that it did?· What does it relate 21· · · ·to? 22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 23· ·Q.· You can answer. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 52 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 54.
    ·1· ·A.· Myopinion?· Are you asking for my opinion? ·2· ·Q.· Well, there's a thorny issue there because your ·3· · · ·opinion not as a person, but your assessment as the ·4· · · ·town manager, correct, yes? ·5· ·A.· As to why they, say it again, then. ·6· ·Q.· Why they say, because you weren't there when they ·7· · · ·were doing things, so we are just going to take it ·8· · · ·as that -- they are the ones saying they did ·9· · · ·certain things.· We will take that at face value -- 10· · · ·but with respect to the things, the legal services 11· · · ·or the legal work that DTC is saying that it did or 12· · · ·they did on behalf of the Town of Haverhill, why 13· · · ·did they do those things? 14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 15· ·Q.· You can answer. 16· ·A.· Like you said, I wasn't involved in 99 percent of 17· · · ·whatever it is they did do behind the scenes there, 18· · · ·but my understanding and the only connection that I 19· · · ·have seen is that Chris Hawkins had litigated 20· · · ·against the Town of Haverhill on behalf of the 21· · · ·Woodsville Fire District, and he was still pursuing 22· · · ·that in a different way. 23· ·Q.· So when Chris Hawkins represented Woodsville BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 53 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 55.
    ·1· · ··Village District, he also was with a different ·2· · · ·firm?· He wasn't then employed with DTC law firm; ·3· · · ·correct? ·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·5· ·Q.· You can answer. ·6· ·A.· That is true. ·7· ·Q.· Okay.· And it's your understanding that the lawyers ·8· · · ·at DTC or DTC did what they are saying they did, ·9· · · ·the legal services that they are saying they 10· · · ·provided for the Town of Haverhill, they actually 11· · · ·did those things to benefit Woodsville Village 12· · · ·District; correct? 13· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 14· ·Q.· You can answer. 15· ·A.· I believe so. 16· ·Q.· Okay.· Who, who for the Town of Haverhill approved 17· · · ·or authorized DTC to do the work and provide the 18· · · ·legal services that they say they provided for the 19· · · ·Town? 20· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 21· ·Q.· You can answer. 22· ·A.· Well, Steve Robbins, Village District employee and 23· · · ·resident, signed documents for DTC in the district BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 54 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 56.
    ·1· · ··office. ·2· ·Q.· Okay. ·3· ·A.· And that's about as much as I know about. ·4· ·Q.· Okay.· So do you know who, who else or who the ·5· · · ·other members were, if any, who also agreed and ·6· · · ·authorized DTC to perform the legal services that ·7· · · ·they did? ·8· ·A.· There are no meetings on record, no minutes, so I ·9· · · ·couldn't answer that question. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· What, if anything, do you know about legal 11· · · ·services that DTC is saying that it provided to the 12· · · ·Town, specifically the board of selectmen, that 13· · · ·they say are connected to or related to personnel 14· · · ·matters? 15· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 16· ·Q.· You can answer. 17· ·A.· There's one brief entry on an invoice related to my 18· · · ·review and my evaluation. 19· ·Q.· Okay.· And what does that time entry on that 20· · · ·invoice mean to you or what's your understanding of 21· · · ·it? 22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 23· ·Q.· You can answer. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 55 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 57.
    ·1· ·A.· Theassumption was that at some point one of board ·2· · · ·members sent DTC my evaluation for review, and it ·3· · · ·was not a significant amount of time, so I have no ·4· · · ·idea the context of that. ·5· ·Q.· Okay.· And so do you know which board members were ·6· · · ·involved in either communications or activity ·7· · · ·related to that supposed one-time entry? ·8· ·A.· I don't know who.· I don't, I wasn't involved. ·9· ·Q.· Okay.· Was this problem or the issue with respect 10· · · ·to the New Hampshire Department of Revenue 11· · · ·Administration, the DRA as we have been referring 12· · · ·to it today, this problem or issue with respect to 13· · · ·DRA not setting the tax rate for the Town of 14· · · ·Haverhill, does that or does it not relate to or 15· · · ·fit under the heading of, so to speak, all legal 16· · · ·matters relating to Woodsville? 17· ·A.· It does. 18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 19· ·Q.· It does?· Okay.· So when this DRA tax setting issue 20· · · ·came about -- not a very articulate way of saying 21· · · ·it -- began with DRA issuing the letter that it did 22· · · ·to the Town, what was the status of Woodsville's 23· · · ·lawsuit against the Town of Haverhill, the one that BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 56 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 58.
    ·1· · ··started, I believe, in 2020 or earlier?· What was, ·2· · · ·do you recall what the status was at that -- when ·3· · · ·this DRA tax setting issue came about, what was the ·4· · · ·status of that lawsuit? ·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·6· ·Q.· You can answer. ·7· ·A.· We were still in the middle of settlement ·8· · · ·finalization. ·9· ·Q.· Okay.· Not having been involved, what does that 10· · · ·mean?· Can you provide -- 11· ·A.· We still owed the Village of Woodsville Fire 12· · · ·District a second settlement payment. 13· ·Q.· Okay.· Was there still a lawsuit going on in the 14· · · ·court? 15· ·A.· It was not, we were, we had, we had negotiated a 16· · · ·settlement and we were in the middle of executing 17· · · ·that settlement. 18· ·Q.· There was a settlement agreement that had been 19· · · ·finalized; correct? 20· ·A.· Yes. 21· ·Q.· And then what, if anything, do you know as far as 22· · · ·what documents had been filed with the court in 23· · · ·connection with that lawsuit, again, when this DRA BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 57 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 59.
    ·1· · ··tax setting issue reared its head? ·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·3· ·Q.· You can answer. ·4· ·A.· I don't recall what had been filed before the ·5· · · ·letter got issued. ·6· ·Q.· Okay. ·7· ·A.· But it was in January and that we were, at the end ·8· · · ·of January we made the second settlement payment. ·9· · · ·And then after that there was something filed with 10· · · ·the court, I believe in February, on letting them 11· · · ·know we had finished. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· What as of, we will take it as of February 13· · · ·of 2023 -- 14· ·A.· '3. 15· ·Q.· Okay.· As of February 2023, the Town of Haverhill 16· · · ·had made this agreed-upon second payment to the, to 17· · · ·Woodsville; correct? 18· ·A.· Yes. 19· ·Q.· What, as far as your understanding as town manager 20· · · ·at that point, what else was there required by that 21· · · ·settlement that Haverhill had to do, you know, to 22· · · ·or for Woodsville?· Was there anything left -- 23· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 58 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 60.
    ·1· ·Q.· Goahead.· You can answer. ·2· ·A.· With regards the, just the lawsuit? ·3· ·Q.· This lawsuit and the settlement, yes. ·4· ·A.· So after we finally filed with the court letting ·5· · · ·them know we had executed the settlement agreement, ·6· · · ·I believe that would be the end of it.· There would ·7· · · ·be nothing else that we would need to file with the ·8· · · ·court. ·9· ·Q.· Okay.· But in addition, with respect to the 10· · · ·settlement agreement, what each party said it was 11· · · ·going to do or not to do, so the typical agreement, 12· · · ·Town of Haverhill makes a second payment to 13· · · ·Woodsville Village District, and it was the second 14· · · ·payment of two; correct? 15· ·A.· Yes. 16· ·Q.· Okay.· What additional or what other things did the 17· · · ·Town of Haverhill still need to do to carry out its 18· · · ·half of the agreement, so to speak?· Was there 19· · · ·anything else? 20· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 21· ·Q.· You can answer. 22· ·A.· There wouldn't have been anything after we 23· · · ·finalized the settlement. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 59 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 61.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Take a look at that and we ·2· · · ·will mark it. ·3· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Can we go off the record and ·4· · · ·take a quick break. ·5· · · · · · · · ·(Recess taken.) ·6· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 1, 3/6/20 Town of Haverhill ·7· · · ·Nonpublic Meeting Minutes, marked for ·8· · · ·identification.) ·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Back the record. 10· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Okay.· So we stipulate that 11· · · ·all objections are preserved. 12· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Yeah.· And I would just add 13· · · ·without, without counsel for the Town having to 14· · · ·object upon the presentation of each question, 15· · · ·especially with respect to form. 16· ·BY MR. SOUCY: 17· ·Q.· Okay.· So, Ms. Codling, I have sent over across the 18· · · ·table a document, two-page document to you.· First 19· · · ·page is essentially a coversheet, if you will. 20· · · ·Once you and your attorney have taken a look at it 21· · · ·just so it's on the record, just let me know when 22· · · ·you've read over and you're ready for a question. 23· · · · · · · · ·(Pause.) BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 60 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 62.
    ·1· ·A.· I'mgood. ·2· ·Q.· All set? ·3· ·A.· Uh-huh. ·4· ·Q.· Sorry. ·5· ·A.· That's okay.· Yes.· Yes. ·6· ·Q.· Is that an uh-uh or yes?· Everybody does it.· Okay. ·7· · · ·So back on the record, still under oath after a ·8· · · ·brief break.· And I have handed you a document and ·9· · · ·marked it as Exhibit No. 1 to your deposition. 10· · · · · · · · ·Can you tell me what this document is? 11· · · ·Do you recognize it? 12· ·A.· Minutes to the nonpublic meeting of March 6th, 13· · · ·2020. 14· ·Q.· Okay.· And two thirds of the way down the page 15· · · ·there is just barely under three lines that look 16· · · ·like it was highlighted.· It's slightly shaded.· It 17· · · ·starts out with, Darwin made the motion.· Do you 18· · · ·see that sentence? 19· ·A.· I do. 20· ·Q.· Okay.· With respect to that sentence there, is that 21· · · ·the motion through which the board of selectmen 22· · · ·back in 2020 assigned to you or delegated to you 23· · · ·the power and the responsibility to make decisions BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 61 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 63.
    ·1· · ··regarding or over legal matters related to the ·2· · · ·Woodsville Precinct? ·3· ·A.· It does.· It is. ·4· ·Q.· Okay.· And this is, at the top it states this is ·5· · · ·the meeting minutes, looks like from the, or ·6· · · ·appears to have been from the nonpublic session? ·7· ·A.· Yes. ·8· ·Q.· Okay.· Having attended a good number of these board ·9· · · ·of selectmen meetings in this town, is this 10· · · ·typically, again up at the caption or top of the 11· · · ·page here, is it typically how the meeting minutes 12· · · ·would be indicated if or when they are from the 13· · · ·nonpublic session? 14· ·A.· Most of the time. 15· ·Q.· Okay.· Are there, well, does the board of selectmen 16· · · ·and has the board of selectmen generally produced 17· · · ·two sets of meetings, one for the public and then a 18· · · ·separate one for the nonpublic meeting sessions? 19· ·A.· Yes, there's two sets of minutes if they go into 20· · · ·nonpublic. 21· ·Q.· Okay.· So this is consistent with the minutes from 22· · · ·a nonpublic meeting or nonpublic session of the 23· · · ·board of selectmen? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 62 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 64.
    ·1· ·A.· Yes. ·2··Q.· Okay.· So with respect to, again the phrase that we ·3· · · ·have been saying over and over again so far, the ·4· · · ·legal matters related to the Woodsville Precinct, ·5· · · ·back in March of 2020 what do you recall your ·6· · · ·understanding of what that phrase "legal matters" ·7· · · ·related to? ·8· ·A.· Literally anything.· Literally any legal matter. ·9· ·Q.· Okay.· So it was, your understanding then was that 10· · · ·it also involved even things beyond the assessment, 11· · · ·appropriation and distribution of property tax 12· · · ·dollars to Woodsville?· It encompassed even things 13· · · ·further in a broader scope of subject areas than 14· · · ·those things? 15· ·A.· The collection, distribution of taxes isn't a legal 16· · · ·matter. 17· ·Q.· I'm sorry?· It's what? 18· ·A.· That's not normally a legal matter, the 19· · · ·distribution of taxes. 20· ·Q.· Okay.· So then what falls within that phrase "legal 21· · · ·matters"? 22· ·A.· So literally anytime we would need to confer with 23· · · ·legal, obtain legal or file anything that would be BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 63 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 65.
    ·1· · ··a legal filing would be me. ·2· ·Q.· So if there were a legal dispute between the Town ·3· · · ·and Woodsville Precinct, as it's referred to ·4· · · ·here -- ·5· ·A.· That's another name. ·6· ·Q.· -- we are going to throw a third term in here now ·7· · · ·just to indicate Woodsville -- but if there were a ·8· · · ·dispute between the Town of Haverhill and ·9· · · ·Woodsville relating to a vehicle that attorneys 10· · · ·were needed, that would be a legal matter? 11· ·A.· Say that again. 12· ·Q.· Yeah.· I'm just trying to get an understanding of 13· · · ·this phrase "legal matters" in relation to 14· · · ·Woodsville.· If there were or had been some dispute 15· · · ·between the Town and Woodsville over a vehicle or 16· · · ·about a vehicle -- I'm trying to take it outside 17· · · ·of, like real estate taxes or property taxes -- was 18· · · ·it your understanding that when the board of 19· · · ·selectmen delegated that authority to you and 20· · · ·responsibility to you that it also would have 21· · · ·covered some legal dispute over a vehicle somehow 22· · · ·between the Town and Woodsville? 23· ·A.· So at that time any legal matters in general were BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 64 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 66.
    ·1· · ··in my ball court, they were my responsibility.· And ·2· · · ·so with regard to Woodsville Precinct, it would be ·3· · · ·exclusively mine. ·4· ·Q.· Okay.· And that would still be consistent with what ·5· · · ·you testified earlier today as well that when, your ·6· · · ·understanding was when the board delegated that ·7· · · ·authority and responsibility to you, again with ·8· · · ·respect to all legal matters relating to ·9· · · ·Woodsville, that the board retained or kept no 10· · · ·authority for itself from that date forward? 11· ·A.· Over Woodsville matters, yes. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· Over Woodsville matters; correct.· Okay. 13· · · ·When, just a little while ago I was asking you 14· · · ·about the lawsuit that Woodsville brought against 15· · · ·the Town in connection with tax payments and tax 16· · · ·money to Woodsville.· We've already covered that 17· · · ·that case, that legal matter was settled. 18· · · · · · · · ·There was, do you recall what there was 19· · · ·for documents that the two parties signed to 20· · · ·document or memorialize the settlement?· Do you 21· · · ·recall what any of those documents were? 22· ·A.· The settlement agreement. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· All right.· Do you recall anything in BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 65 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 67.
    ·1· · ··addition to the actual settlement agreement? ·2· ·A.· Not that I recall. ·3· ·Q.· Okay.· Who signed, on behalf of the Town of ·4· · · ·Haverhill, who signed the settlement agreement? ·5· ·A.· The chair, the chair, Fred Garofalo signed that. ·6· ·Q.· Do you, so you recall that Fred Garofalo, the ·7· · · ·chairman of the board of selectmen, signed the ·8· · · ·settlement agreement between the Town and ·9· · · ·Woodsville? 10· ·A.· He did, after settlement negotiations. 11· ·Q.· Okay.· Prior to that were there any other documents 12· · · ·in connection with the settlement of that lawsuit 13· · · ·that the Town signed? 14· ·A.· I don't recall. 15· ·Q.· Okay. 16· ·A.· Probably, but I can't recall specifically.· It's 17· · · ·been a while. 18· ·Q.· What role, if any, did you have in connection with 19· · · ·the settlement negotiations? 20· ·A.· I was part of the settlement negotiations. 21· ·Q.· And did you decide whether or not the case was or 22· · · ·whether or not the Town agreed to settle the case? 23· ·A.· It was -- no, the board voted. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 66 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 68.
    ·1· ·Q.· Doyou know why it wasn't your decision? ·2· ·A.· I don't recall exactly how that played out, other ·3· · · ·than the fact that we were going to spending a lot ·4· · · ·of money; and the final authority on spending that ·5· · · ·kind of money is up to the board. ·6· ·Q.· The payment of the money was what was needed to ·7· · · ·bring about the resolution of the dispute between ·8· · · ·the parties, though, right? ·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 10· ·Q.· You can answer. 11· ·A.· Say it again. 12· ·Q.· Yeah, the payment of the money by the Town to 13· · · ·Woodsville was part of what was agreed upon to 14· · · ·resolve the legal dispute between the towns, 15· · · ·though, right? 16· ·A.· That was the biggest component of settling was 17· · · ·whether there was going to be money exchanged. 18· ·Q.· But the decision as to whether or not the Town was 19· · · ·going to pay that money wasn't solely your 20· · · ·decision? 21· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 22· ·Q.· Correct? 23· ·A.· Even as town manager I can't spend that kind of BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 67 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 69.
    ·1· · ··money without the approval of select board.· I can ·2· · · ·only spend what's in the budget, what's been ·3· · · ·approved at town meeting; that's under my ·4· · · ·authority. ·5· ·Q.· And this was a legal matter relating to Woodsville; ·6· · · ·correct? ·7· ·A.· It was. ·8· ·Q.· Whose decision was it to post the documents ·9· · · ·relating to this lawsuit on the Town's website? 10· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 11· ·A.· The select board. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you know why they decided or it decided 13· · · ·to do that? 14· ·A.· To be transparent. 15· ·Q.· Whose decision was it to post the documents that 16· · · ·are on the Town's website with respect to this 17· · · ·lawsuit here between the Town of Haverhill and DTC? 18· ·A.· The board, for the same reasons. 19· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 2, 1/9/22 Town of Haverhill 20· · · ·Meeting Minutes, marked for identification.) 21· ·Q.· Okay.· Have you had a chance to look at the 22· · · ·document that I have just given you? 23· ·A.· Yes. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 68 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 70.
    ·1· ·Q.· Andit's been marked as Exhibit No. 2.· At the top ·2· · · ·it says that it is an Emergency Select Board ·3· · · ·Meeting, and these are the minutes of that from ·4· · · ·January 9th, 2022; correct? ·5· ·A.· Yes. ·6· ·Q.· Okay.· Third paragraph down is Town employees ·7· · · ·present, and it appears that both you and -- ·8· ·A.· Jennifer. ·9· ·Q.· -- Ms. Boucher were present; is that correct? 10· ·A.· That's correct; yes. 11· ·Q.· Second-to-last paragraph from the bottom there's a 12· · · ·discussion about Drummond Woodsum attorneys.· Who 13· · · ·are they? 14· ·A.· They are the attorneys that we had been using since 15· · · ·the fall of 2019 on Woodsville-related matters. 16· ·Q.· Okay.· And then on the second to third line it 17· · · ·indicates that there was a conflict of interest 18· · · ·apparently that Drummond Woodsum had.· What was 19· · · ·that conflict of interest? 20· ·A.· It was that they were representing, they had 21· · · ·represented both the school and Mountain Lakes 22· · · ·District in various things in the past. 23· ·Q.· What way, if any, were those prior representations BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 69 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 71.
    ·1· · ··or the subject matter of those prior ·2· · · ·representations related to each other; do you know? ·3· ·A.· To each other's representations, like the school ·4· · · ·and the district -- ·5· ·Q.· Correct. ·6· ·A.· -- with the town?· Or just -- ·7· ·Q.· With each other.· The school and the district. ·8· ·A.· I don't think that it was a conflict between the ·9· · · ·school and district.· It was that Drummond Woodsum 10· · · ·had represented the school district in the past and 11· · · ·they had represented Mountain Lakes District in the 12· · · ·past.· And so they wanted to make sure they could 13· · · ·clear any conflicts that might be there before they 14· · · ·continued to represent us. 15· ·Q.· So step by step.· And then what was, as you 16· · · ·understand it, what was the conflict in this 17· · · ·situation here as of January of 2022 that Drummond 18· · · ·Woodsum believed that it had as between the school 19· · · ·district and the Town itself? 20· ·A.· They at that point weren't sure they truly had a 21· · · ·conflict.· They had represented both parties, so 22· · · ·they wanted to make sure there was not a conflict. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· And what's your understanding as far as BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 70 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 72.
    ·1· · ··whether or not there was actually a conflict? ·2· ·A.· There was no conflict in the end. ·3· ·Q.· Did Drummond Woodsum produce or generate and send ·4· · · ·to the Town a waiver of conflict of interest? ·5· ·A.· Yes. ·6· ·Q.· Okay.· And who signed that? ·7· ·A.· I did. ·8· ·Q.· Okay.· If there wasn't a conflict of interest, why ·9· · · ·did you as the town manager then sign a waiver of 10· · · ·the conflict of interest? 11· ·A.· The conflict of interest waiver basically said that 12· · · ·there was no conflict; just that they had 13· · · ·represented those parties and we understood that. 14· ·Q.· So is it fair to say that it operated more as a 15· · · ·disclosure than an actual waiver?· A waiver of 16· · · ·something that didn't exist is a little 17· · · ·problematic.· Is it fair to say that the waiver of 18· · · ·conflict of interest document that you signed in 19· · · ·connection with Drummond Woodsum then, 2022, was 20· · · ·more of a disclosure?· They were disclosing, sort 21· · · ·of, what they had for past representation, legal 22· · · ·representation? 23· ·A.· Perhaps it could be seen that way. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 71 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 73.
    ·1· ·Q.· Okay.·How did you see it then? ·2· ·A.· I guess that would be a good, a good categorization ·3· · · ·of that, that they were disclosing that they had ·4· · · ·represented the school district, they had ·5· · · ·represented the Mountain Lakes District, and that ·6· · · ·they didn't feel that those representations had any ·7· · · ·impact on the Town, in their representation of the ·8· · · ·Town, and I agreed. ·9· ·Q.· So your opinion was as well that there wasn't 10· · · ·actually a conflict of interest; is that accurate? 11· ·A.· Nothing, nothing of any significance. 12· ·Q.· There was a conflict, it was just minor, or there 13· · · ·wasn't a conflict? 14· ·A.· I wouldn't have seen it as a real conflict. 15· ·Q.· And do you know what the school district did with 16· · · ·respect to any kind of waiver that Drummond Woodsum 17· · · ·sent over to it? 18· ·A.· Originally they did, the school board voted not to 19· · · ·sign it.· And then on the 12th they were made aware 20· · · ·that by not signing it, it would keep Drummond 21· · · ·Woodsum from representing the Town; and so they 22· · · ·immediately went back in and signed it. 23· ·Q.· Why did the school board initially decide that they BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 72 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 74.
    ·1· · ··weren't going to sign it? ·2· ·A.· I wasn't there, but the school board chair stated ·3· · · ·that they misunderstood what it was for. ·4· ·Q.· What did he give for an explanation as to what the ·5· · · ·misunderstanding was? ·6· ·A.· That's all he said was that they misunderstood. ·7· ·Q.· Okay.· What is your understanding with respect to ·8· · · ·the members of the board of selectmen and the board ·9· · · ·of selectmen retaining or hiring or not hiring DTC 10· · · ·Lawyers with respect to the DRA rate setting issue? 11· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 12· ·Q.· You can answer. 13· ·A.· Can you say that again, the beginning of it. 14· ·Q.· Yeah.· With respect to the members on the board of 15· · · ·selectmen, what was their understanding or their 16· · · ·position with respect to the board of selectmen 17· · · ·hiring or retaining DTC Lawyers for or in 18· · · ·connection with the DRA rate setting issue? 19· ·A.· I don't want to speculate what they believed or 20· · · ·what they thought.· The only individual who ever 21· · · ·made a statement was Steve Robbins, who said it was 22· · · ·their intent to do so. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· And is that what he stated directly to you? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 73 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 75.
    ·1· ·A.· Yes. ·2··Q.· What explanation, if any, did he give for his ·3· · · ·position about having intended to retain DTC ·4· · · ·Lawyers? ·5· ·A.· I don't recall him ever giving me an explanation. ·6· ·Q.· It was just that statement itself standing alone? ·7· ·A.· Basically.· Basically.· There was no in-depth ·8· · · ·explanation on what the board was doing. ·9· ·Q.· Okay. 10· ·A.· Or why. 11· ·Q.· And do you recall any other member of the board of 12· · · ·selectmen stating or communicating to you that they 13· · · ·intended to hire or retain DTC for the property, 14· · · ·the rate setting issue? 15· ·A.· Directly to me? 16· ·Q.· Communicated in any way, yeah, spoken?· Email? 17· · · ·Text? 18· ·A.· There was a public statement read on January 17th 19· · · ·that was coauthored or significantly edited by 20· · · ·Chris Hawkins that made a statement that the board 21· · · ·intended to hire DTC. 22· ·Q.· Okay.· Who else on the board of selectmen, if 23· · · ·anybody, also stated or communicated to you that it BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 74 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 76.
    ·1· · ··was their intent as members of the board of ·2· · · ·selectmen to hire or retain DTC in connection with ·3· · · ·the DRA rate setting matter? ·4· ·A.· Other than that January 17th meeting I don't recall ·5· · · ·any other board members specifically saying that. ·6· · · ·Nothing sticks in my mind. ·7· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 3, 5/15/24 Email, marked for ·8· · · ·identification.) ·9· · · · · · · · ·(Pause.) 10· ·Q.· Okay.· So I gave you a document that is a string or 11· · · ·chain of emails, which the original document is 12· · · ·January 11th of 2022.· You've had a, and January 13· · · ·10th, 2022.· You've had a chance to review this 14· · · ·with your attorney? 15· ·A.· We both looked at it, yes. 16· ·Q.· Just want to make sure that the record -- sorry. 17· · · ·Just making sure the record is there that you guys 18· · · ·have looked at it. 19· ·A.· Yes. 20· ·Q.· Okay.· Yes.· At the bottom of the first page of 21· · · ·this document it's an email that says it's from 22· · · ·you.· It's dated January 11th, 2023, and this 23· · · ·particular email is at 2:28 p.m. to Steve Robbins. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 75 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 77.
    ·1· · ··Do you see where that begins? ·2· ·A.· I do. ·3· ·Q.· Okay.· And then it goes on to the second page. ·4· · · ·This is an email that you sent to Steve Robbins who ·5· · · ·was the, at the time was the chairman of the board ·6· · · ·of selectmen; correct? ·7· ·A.· He was probably the interim chair at that point. ·8· ·Q.· The interim chair or vice chair, right? ·9· ·A.· Yeah, I don't remember exactly when. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· So four paragraphs from the bottom it 11· · · ·states, The issue we face is not having a tax rate 12· · · ·set.· Do you see that line in that paragraph? 13· ·A.· I do, yup. 14· ·Q.· Okay.· So the issue was not really with the lawsuit 15· · · ·that Woodsville had brought against the Town of 16· · · ·Haverhill and everything that been pled or alleged 17· · · ·in that lawsuit; this was a separate issue of the 18· · · ·DRA delaying or refusing to set the tax rate for 19· · · ·the Town in 2000-, dragged into 2023, but it 20· · · ·started actually in 2022; correct? 21· ·A.· Which part? 22· ·Q.· I -- 23· ·A.· The settlement component?· The lawsuit started in BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 76 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 78.
    ·1· · ··early 2020. ·2· ·Q.· Right.· But this line, these two lines here, The ·3· · · ·issue we face with not having the tax rate set.· So ·4· · · ·what you and Steve are communicating about is the ·5· · · ·DRA not setting the tax rate, not anything ·6· · · ·specifically that was filed in connection with the ·7· · · ·lawsuit that Woodsville brought against the Town of ·8· · · ·Haverhill; correct? ·9· ·A.· It is connected and that's why I go on to say that 10· · · ·it's not our fault or anything we have any control 11· · · ·over, because the tax rate not being set was due to 12· · · ·Article 27 and 28, which was due to highway 13· · · ·funding, which is the same thing we were litigating 14· · · ·over with regards to the lawsuit.· It was an 15· · · ·ongoing problem. 16· ·Q.· So all of this came about not as a result of or the 17· · · ·fault of anyone in the town doing anything wrong; 18· · · ·correct? 19· ·A.· Correct. 20· ·Q.· Okay. 21· ·A.· Well, town government. 22· ·Q.· Well, prior to this, generally a year prior to 23· · · ·this, January, about January of 2022, you had BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 77 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 79.
    ·1· · ··emailed the DRA a number of times and gave them or ·2· · · ·forewarned them about Article 27 and Article 28 ·3· · · ·that it was, something was going to be coming; ·4· · · ·correct? ·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·6· ·Q.· Go ahead.· You can answer. ·7· ·A.· So part of the review process for the warrant is ·8· · · ·for us to the send the warrant to the DRA for a ·9· · · ·pre-reveal, and that's what I had done. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· And is that all you had done with respect to 11· · · ·that process? 12· ·A.· No.· I had communicated the sentiments of the 13· · · ·select board with regards to those warrant 14· · · ·articles. 15· ·Q.· And where are those, as you put it, sentiments of 16· · · ·the select board recorded? 17· ·A.· I'd have to -- 18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 19· ·Q.· You can answer. 20· ·A.· I'd have to go back through the minutes leading up 21· · · ·to that point.· And then certainly discussions with 22· · · ·board members individually. 23· ·Q.· So you had individual or you had conversations or BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 78 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 80.
    ·1· · ··communications with individual board meetings[sic] ·2· · · ·outside of public meetings? ·3· ·A.· Not board.· With individual selectmen, selectmen, ·4· · · ·especially the chair. ·5· ·Q.· Outside of a public meeting? ·6· ·A.· 'Cause he would come into my office, all the board ·7· · · ·members come in to talk to town administrator. ·8· ·Q.· All right. ·9· ·A.· Normally. 10· ·Q.· And those communications and conversations occurred 11· · · ·outside of a public meeting; correct? 12· ·A.· Yup. 13· ·Q.· Is there any record of those discussions that you 14· · · ·had with individual board members outside a public 15· · · ·meeting regarding these two warrant articles, No. 16· · · ·27 and 28, either before they were formally 17· · · ·submitted or afterwards? 18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection. 19· ·Q.· You can answer. 20· ·A.· Formally submitted to the DRA after town meeting 21· · · ·or ... 22· ·Q.· Before they were formally submitted to the Town for 23· · · ·submission to the public, the annual meeting? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 79 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 81.
    ·1· ·A.· Sowe don't find out about warrant articles until ·2· · · ·they are submitted to the town clerk; so before ·3· · · ·that I had no knowledge of them at all. ·4· ·Q.· You had some idea that something was going to be ·5· · · ·submitted, though, did you? ·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection. ·7· ·Q.· You can answer. ·8· ·A.· No. ·9· ·Q.· Okay. 10· ·A.· Not to the town clerk, no. 11· ·Q.· And then after they had been formally submitted to 12· · · ·the Town, you had conversations with individual 13· · · ·board members out -- 14· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Hold for a second, please. 15· · · · · · · · ·(Recess taken.) 16· · · · · · · · ·(Roderick O'Shana now present.) 17· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Back on the record. 18· · · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· You'll have to reiterate 19· · · ·what you asked. 20· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Yes. 21· ·BY MR. SOUCY: 22· ·Q.· So after Warrant Articles 27 and 28 had been 23· · · ·submitted to the Town of Haverhill, you had BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 80 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 82.
    ·1· · ··communications or discussions with individual ·2· · · ·members of the board of selectmen that occurred ·3· · · ·outside of, or not during, public meetings; ·4· · · ·correct? ·5· ·A.· Yup.· Yes. ·6· ·Q.· Is there any written notes or anything that was ·7· · · ·memorialized of those communications? ·8· ·A.· No, they were fairly informal. ·9· ·Q.· What is the process through which the town manager 10· · · ·submits warrant articles to the DRA for the review? 11· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection. 12· ·Q.· You can -- 13· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· We are kind of going outside 14· · · ·of the Court's April 4th order limiting it to 15· · · ·issues relevant to the motions for summary judgment 16· · · ·and defendant's opposition thereto. 17· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Okay.· Not surprising, I 18· · · ·disagree because this is exactly the reason why 19· · · ·this was in front of the DRA.· Your client has 20· · · ·stated that it wasn't her fault.· And this is tied 21· · · ·to Exhibit No. 16 of the statement of facts that 22· · · ·relates to the DRA having this on their radar and 23· · · ·credibility of your client. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 81 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 83.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · ·So we can move forward. ·2· ·BY MR. SOUCY: ·3· ·Q.· With respect to those communications there was ·4· · · ·nothing in writing.· You also said that whenever ·5· · · ·the articles, warrant articles that are formally ·6· · · ·submitted to the town clerk, they are sent to the ·7· · · ·DRA for a review process; correct? ·8· ·A.· So warrant articles are submitted to the town ·9· · · ·clerk. 10· ·Q.· Yup. 11· ·A.· She verifies the petitions and the signatures on 12· · · ·the petitions, that they are registered voters, and 13· · · ·then they come over to the town administration 14· · · ·office.· We compile them and they go to the DRA for 15· · · ·a prereview. 16· ·Q.· Okay.· What does the town manager send specifically 17· · · ·to the DRA for the DRA to conduct its review? 18· ·A.· We enter them into the portal, and what you're 19· · · ·entering is the question. 20· ·Q.· Okay. 21· ·A.· Sometimes they ask for the whole petition; it 22· · · ·depends. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· Initially, though, there is a for, for BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 82 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 84.
    ·1· · ··someone in any of the towns in New Hampshire, ·2· · · ·whatever form of government the town has, but ·3· · · ·someone is assigned within the town to log in to ·4· · · ·website into a portal that the DRA has; is that ·5· · · ·correct? ·6· ·A.· Yes. ·7· ·Q.· Okay.· So then when that employee logs in to DRA's ·8· · · ·website, is it fair to say that an initial phase or ·9· · · ·stage then is for the employee to look at and read 10· · · ·and enter in word for word or verbatim what the 11· · · ·warrant article states? 12· ·A.· It should be word for word whatever the question 13· · · ·is, yes.· The question that the public will be 14· · · ·asked. 15· ·Q.· What happens after that? 16· ·A.· The DRA often comes back and asks questions.· Might 17· · · ·discuss with us the questions being asked.· Because 18· · · ·these are petitions, they are not always worded 19· · · ·legally or correctly.· Some of them, that's usually 20· · · ·when we find out if they are binding or advisory 21· · · ·based on what the question is; that sort of thing. 22· ·Q.· What did you mean by "binding or advisory"? 23· ·A.· When the people vote whether their vote binds the BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 83 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 85.
    ·1· · ··Town to do something or whether it's just advisory; ·2· · · ·whether it's just they get to have a say of how ·3· · · ·they feel about it, but it's not going to actually ·4· · · ·bind us to do anything. ·5· ·Q.· With respect to Warrant Article No. 27, what, if ·6· · · ·anything, did the DRA ask for with respect to ·7· · · ·additional information? ·8· ·A.· They didn't necessarily until after town meeting; ·9· · · ·and then they asked for a lot. 10· ·Q.· And so was it your office or was it you that 11· · · ·provided that additional information? 12· ·A.· After town meeting? 13· ·Q.· Yes. 14· ·A.· It was both myself and Jennifer Boucher. 15· ·Q.· What was that information? 16· ·A.· Oh, goodness.· They asked for 100 years of town 17· · · ·reports.· They asked for, I can't remember 18· · · ·everything.· They asked, there was a lot of 19· · · ·historical information, factual information, 20· · · ·anything we had in our records that they thought 21· · · ·would help them with their evaluation. 22· ·Q.· With respect to Warrant Article 28 -- 23· ·A.· The same. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 84 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 86.
    ·1· ·Q.· Theyasked for the same information or what was, ·2· · · ·what you and Ms. Boucher provided to the department ·3· · · ·applied to both articles? ·4· ·A.· It applied to both articles because when they were, ·5· · · ·when the DRA reached out to us, they weren't being ·6· · · ·specific which article they were asking for that ·7· · · ·information; they just told us what they needed. ·8· · · ·And at the time we weren't even really aware what ·9· · · ·they were looking for or what they were looking at. 10· · · ·They just, they asked for something; we would 11· · · ·provide it. 12· ·Q.· So the request then from DRA did not specify that, 13· · · ·which article they needed the information for; they 14· · · ·just then made a general request for information; 15· · · ·is that correct? 16· ·A.· Yes. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· Other than the information that DRA asked 18· · · ·for after the town meeting and the vote that 19· · · ·approved each of these two articles, what other 20· · · ·communications did you have with DRA with respect 21· · · ·to the warrant articles? 22· ·A.· After town meeting? 23· ·Q.· After town meeting. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 85 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 87.
    ·1· ·A.· Otherthan providing information, I don't recall. ·2· ·Q.· What about before the town meeting? ·3· ·A.· Before town meeting I had sent email, an email or ·4· · · ·emails to James Gerry regarding those articles and ·5· · · ·that it was the Town's understanding that they ·6· · · ·should be disallowed. ·7· ·Q.· And you stated that it's your belief that there are ·8· · · ·minutes of the board of selectmen that document ·9· · · ·that the board of selectmen asked you to send those 10· · · ·communications over to DRA before the town meeting? 11· ·A.· I don't know if there are, is anything explicit 12· · · ·like that in the minutes, but there were certainly 13· · · ·discussions with the board of selectmen and the 14· · · ·individual board members about the disallowance. 15· ·Q.· And were those discussions, when did those 16· · · ·discussions occur, inside or outside of public town 17· · · ·meetings, public meetings of the board? 18· ·A.· Both.· Not amongst the board members, but board 19· · · ·members and myself. 20· ·Q.· And who were the board members that you had 21· · · ·discussions with that you say was an indication of 22· · · ·the board of selectmen requesting or wanting you as 23· · · ·the town manager to make contact with DRA about BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 86 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 88.
    ·1· · ··these articles that were going to be submitted as ·2· · · ·to whether they were valid or invalid? ·3· ·A.· That would be the chair and the vice chair, so Fred ·4· · · ·Garofalo, Matt Bjelobrk and Howard Hatch. ·5· ·Q.· When was the earliest conversation that you had ·6· · · ·with any of those three? ·7· ·A.· Oh, would have had to have been after the deadline ·8· · · ·for submission of the petition, so sometime in ·9· · · ·mid-February I would think. 10· ·Q.· So between the deadline for the submission of 11· · · ·articles to the Town, but prior to the annual town 12· · · ·meeting? 13· ·A.· Yes. 14· ·Q.· Okay.· And in this situation with respect to 15· · · ·Warrant Articles 27 and 28, that would have been 16· · · ·mid-February of 2022; is that correct? 17· ·A.· Yes.· Yes, I think.· I'd have to go back and check. 18· · · ·I'd have to check. 19· ·Q.· Fairly certain but not absolutely certain? 20· ·A.· I'm pretty sure, yeah. 21· ·Q.· Okay. 22· ·A.· Feels like forever ago. 23· ·Q.· On page 3 of the document that you have in front of BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 87 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 89.
    ·1· · ··you, just about the halfway point there's an email ·2· · · ·from Steve Robbins, still on January 11, 2023, ·3· · · ·11:36 a.m. to you.· Do you see where that email ·4· · · ·begins? ·5· ·A.· I do. ·6· ·Q.· Okay.· And it start out by, Here are my thoughts. ·7· · · ·Steve then writes, We are in crisis, the select ·8· · · ·board hold ultimate responsibility, therefore needs ·9· · · ·to take the lead to get through. 10· · · · · · · · ·Do you see that line? 11· ·A.· I do. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· So back on January 11th of 2023, how does 13· · · ·that statement from Steve Robbins not indicate to 14· · · ·you that the board of selectmen was, as he said, 15· · · ·taking the lead with respect to the DRA tax setting 16· · · ·issue? 17· ·A.· Well, one, individual board members can't make a 18· · · ·statement and have that be an action of the board. 19· ·Q.· Okay.· So who else made a statement similar to that 20· · · ·in substance, meaning the board with respect to 21· · · ·this DRA issue is now taking the lead.· The town 22· · · ·manager is sort of not in the driver's seat, so to 23· · · ·speak, not in control? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 88 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 90.
    ·1· ·A.· Itwas usually Steve. ·2· ·Q.· Okay.· Who else in addition -- ·3· ·A.· I don't recall.· Sorry. ·4· ·Q.· -- with respect to this DRA rate setting issue? ·5· ·A.· I don't recall any of the other board members ·6· · · ·making that statement. ·7· ·Q.· Did you provide him with any reply or any response ·8· · · ·to his statement that it required a full vote or ·9· · · ·anything like that?· What response did you have to 10· · · ·him? 11· ·A.· My response is the email. 12· ·Q.· And that, and that's it?· Just, where in there did 13· · · ·you explain to him that one board member doesn't 14· · · ·bind the entire board of selectmen? 15· ·A.· So in this email I didn't, but at the beginning of 16· · · ·every year after town meeting we go through 17· · · ·standard operating procedures for the board of 18· · · ·selectmen, and it's explicitly pointed out in the 19· · · ·SOPs for the select board that one individual board 20· · · ·member cannot make a decision on their own; it has 21· · · ·to be a formal action of the board in a publicly 22· · · ·warned meeting with a quorum present. 23· ·Q.· And relation to January 11th, when was that review BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 89 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 91.
    ·1· · ··of the standard operating procedures conducted? ·2· ·A.· The last time we would have done that would be ·3· · · ·right after town meeting in 2021.· And it's on the ·4· · · ·select board's website, web page. ·5· ·Q.· So then we would have gone from after town meeting ·6· · · ·2021, which was late February or March? ·7· ·A.· Would have been March. ·8· ·Q.· March?· Okay. ·9· ·A.· Usually the end of March we have our first meeting 10· · · ·where the newly constituted board meets and has 11· · · ·their on-boarding meeting. 12· ·Q.· End of March of 2021, and this is January 11th of 13· · · ·2023.· So as of, as of yet there hadn't been that 14· · · ·review of the standard operating procedures; 15· · · ·correct? 16· ·A.· Not for, not until the next March would we do it 17· · · ·again. 18· ·Q.· But otherwise there's no response from you that 19· · · ·conveyed to him that his position that the board of 20· · · ·selectmen needs to take the lead with respect to 21· · · ·the DRA rate setting issue to get through it, you 22· · · ·didn't have any response to him about that; 23· · · ·correct? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 90 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 92.
    ·1· ·A.· No. ·2··Q.· Okay.· So why was it that you didn't want the board ·3· · · ·of selectmen to be on the lead with respect to the ·4· · · ·DRA rate setting issue? ·5· ·A.· Well, there were a few things that I pointed out in ·6· · · ·my email, and specifically he, the problem we were ·7· · · ·running into is that the board did not fully ·8· · · ·understand or respect the process that had to be ·9· · · ·followed to waive the conflict or not.· You'd have 10· · · ·to go through that conflict check and do your due 11· · · ·diligence for the Town of Haverhill. 12· ·Q.· All right.· And if you could unpack that for me, 13· · · ·explain that a little more how that related to, 14· · · ·relates to why you didn't want the board of 15· · · ·selectmen to take the lead on that rate setting 16· · · ·issue? 17· ·A.· It's not that I didn't want them to take the lead; 18· · · ·it's that we were already working on it, and I was 19· · · ·trying to explain to him and the other board 20· · · ·members what Jennifer and I were already doing with 21· · · ·regard to the tax rate setting matter and what 22· · · ·process we needed to follow. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· And who was working with you, as you said, BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 91 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 93.
    ·1· · ··with respect to the rate setting issue? ·2· ·A.· I was working directly with Jennifer Boucher as the ·3· · · ·assistant town manager, and we were working with ·4· · · ·the DRA and Drummond Woodsum Law Firm. ·5· ·Q.· So as of January 11th what had Drummond Woodsum ·6· · · ·done with respect to the DRA rate setting issue and ·7· · · ·getting it resolved? ·8· ·A.· We were actively involved working with Drummond ·9· · · ·Woodsum Law Firm as well as the DRA on the tax rate 10· · · ·setting matter before that letter came at the end 11· · · ·of December; and we had been working with them on 12· · · ·the tax rate setting matter for weeks because we 13· · · ·already knew there was going to be a delay in the 14· · · ·tax rate because the school had to go through a 15· · · ·procedural defect meeting, which was not going to 16· · · ·happen until the 9th of January. 17· ·Q.· So what had Drummond Woodsum done with respect to 18· · · ·the rate setting issue as of January 11th? 19· ·A.· She had been working with Peter Roth to determine 20· · · ·what was going to happen and when the procedural 21· · · ·defect meeting was going to take place; and she had 22· · · ·set up a meeting between myself, her and Peter Roth 23· · · ·of the DRA to discuss that. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 92 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 94.
    ·1· ·Q.· Whenwas the meeting? ·2· ·A.· Would have been beginning of December, around ·3· · · ·there. ·4· ·Q.· Do you have any record of that meeting, in a ·5· · · ·calendar or on a calendar anywhere? ·6· ·A.· I would have to look.· I would think so, but I ·7· · · ·would have to look. ·8· ·Q.· So I'd like to make a written request to your ·9· · · ·attorney.· And when he receives it, if you'd work 10· · · ·with him to produce that, that would be great. 11· · · · · · · · ·And who was to attend that meeting or who 12· · · ·did attend that meeting? 13· ·A.· It was just Christine Fillmore Johnston of Drummond 14· · · ·Woodsum, myself and Peter Roth of the DRA.· It was 15· · · ·a phone conference. 16· ·Q.· Telephone conference? 17· ·A.· Yes. 18· ·Q.· And what was accomplished during that telephone 19· · · ·conference? 20· ·A.· Just the confirmation that the procedural defect 21· · · ·meeting would happen on January 9th, and that that 22· · · ·would definitely delay the tax rate being set. 23· ·Q.· And what was the procedural defect meeting that the BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 93 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 95.
    ·1· · ··school board had to address? ·2· ·A.· They had received a grant, I believe, and they had ·3· · · ·not held their public hearing properly or they ·4· · · ·hadn't notified it correctly or something like ·5· · · ·that, so they needed to do it over. ·6· ·Q.· And that related to the tax rate setting issuing ·7· · · ·how? ·8· ·A.· Because the town's tax rate is comprised of the ·9· · · ·districts, all the districts, Grafton County and 10· · · ·the state and school tax; and we can't set the 11· · · ·town's tax rate until all those entities have filed 12· · · ·their information and support. 13· ·Q.· Down at the bottom of that third page, the last 14· · · ·three lines, there was an issue, according to this. 15· · · ·What's written here is that the Drummond Woodsum 16· · · ·was having some kind of delay or problem and they 17· · · ·as the board as it's stated here, was deciding to 18· · · ·assign all of the cases of the case with a new firm 19· · · ·immediately.· Do you see that? 20· ·A.· I do. 21· ·Q.· What is your recollection of what that was about 22· · · ·and what became of it? 23· ·A.· That was in relation to the delay on, that was BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 94 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 96.
    ·1· · ··representative of previous minutes we just ·2· · · ·discussed, and that Steve not understanding the ·3· · · ·process and not understanding the variety of ·4· · · ·lawyers we use or what we use them for, that he ·5· · · ·thought it was going to be simple to just produce a ·6· · · ·list and terminate a law firm. ·7· · · · · · · · ·And after we discussed that at length ·8· · · ·further, they understood we use various law firms ·9· · · ·for a variety of different things, not just one 10· · · ·thing. 11· ·Q.· And when was that discussion had? 12· ·A.· I believe we, I think it is reflected in a set of 13· · · ·minutes after this (indicating). 14· ·Q.· So it would have been a public meeting after 15· · · ·January, or maybe even -- 16· ·A.· It would have. 17· ·Q.· -- a nonpublic session anyways of a meeting after 18· · · ·January 11th? 19· ·A.· Yes.· Yes.· I remember we had a very explicit 20· · · ·discussion about law firms, what we use law firms 21· · · ·for and why you don't just terminate a law firm. 22· · · ·And discussing why you wouldn't need to necessarily 23· · · ·terminate Drummond Woodsum simply because they need BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 95 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 97.
    ·1· · ··a little more time to process a conflict waiver. ·2· ·Q.· And they had initially stated that they weren't ·3· · · ·able to continue to represent the Town with respect ·4· · · ·to the tax rate setting issue; correct? ·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·6· ·Q.· You can answer. ·7· ·A.· Until they cleared the conflict. ·8· ·Q.· Okay. ·9· ·A.· It took a few days. 10· ·Q.· What were the board's feelings as far as what 11· · · ·Drummond Woodsum said that it was going to do and 12· · · ·get accomplished and Drummond Woodsum not coming 13· · · ·through on that or delivering that? 14· ·A.· That's reflected in the January 9th meeting 15· · · ·minutes. 16· ·Q.· The number on the sticker? 17· ·A.· It's Exhibit 2. 18· ·Q.· On Exhibit 2? 19· ·A.· Yeah, this is where they first expressed that they 20· · · ·were concerned about Drummond Woodsum because 21· · · ·Drummond Woodsum had not produced the letter. 22· ·Q.· Okay.· And what did the board members say about 23· · · ·getting a different law firm other than Drummond BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 96 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 98.
    ·1· · ··Woodsum because it was a time-sensitive issue? ·2· ·A.· So they asked Jennifer Boucher and I at this ·3· · · ·January 9th meeting to reach out to DTC attorneys ·4· · · ·specifically, to which we thought was strange that ·5· · · ·they cited an attorney, to see if DTC could clear ·6· · · ·their conflicts if Drummond couldn't. ·7· ·Q.· And what is your understanding and your assessment ·8· · · ·with respect to the board of selectmen having the ·9· · · ·recollection that the decision was to actually go 10· · · ·with DTC, not just for town administration to, 11· · · ·quote/unquote, to reach out to DTC? 12· ·A.· What do I think about that? 13· ·Q.· Yeah.· What's your recollection of it?· What's your 14· · · ·understanding of it? 15· ·A.· My recollection is exactly as it's reflected in the 16· · · ·minutes. 17· ·Q.· Okay. 18· ·A.· Because I know what they asked me to do.· And the 19· · · ·fact that I sent an email to Chris Boldt at DTC 20· · · ·that very night exhibits that I did exactly what 21· · · ·they asked me to do, which was to reach out to DTC. 22· ·Q.· So you then disagree with the position that the 23· · · ·members of the board of selectmen have, that their BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 97 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 99.
    ·1· · ··intent was to actually hire at that moment in time ·2· · · ·DTC Lawyers? ·3· ·A.· I don't want to speculate what their, what at that ·4· · · ·point their intent was because I know what the ·5· · · ·motion was, which was very different than what they ·6· · · ·after the fact stated their intent was. ·7· ·Q.· Okay.· But your understanding back when the motion ·8· · · ·was made, your understanding was to only ·9· · · ·communicate with.· You don't, you didn't understand 10· · · ·it that the board members wanted you to move 11· · · ·forward and actually retain DTC Lawyers; correct? 12· ·A.· Absolutely.· There was no indication that at that 13· · · ·point in time they wanted us to actually hire a 14· · · ·different law firm. 15· ·Q.· What matters in addition to or other than the DRA 16· · · ·tax rate setting issue did the board either want to 17· · · ·hire DTC Lawyers or hire DTC Lawyers to address? 18· ·A.· They didn't want to hire DTC for anything at that 19· · · ·point.· We were already using DTC attorneys for 20· · · ·utility matters, which is what we had historically 21· · · ·used them for. 22· ·Q.· In an email that you had with Attorney Christopher 23· · · ·Boldt you had indicated that you had confidence BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 98 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 100.
    ·1· · ··that they could do a good job on the DRA tax ·2· · · ·rating, tax setting issue because of working with ·3· · · ·them in the past; is that what you're referring to? ·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·5· ·Q.· You can answer. ·6· ·A.· At that time I had no idea Chris Hawkins worked for ·7· · · ·DTC attorneys, and I have good relations with Chris ·8· · · ·Boldt.· He had served us well for utility matters. ·9· ·Q.· Were you involved in or did you attend the 10· · · ·nonpublic sessions of the board of selectmen in 11· · · ·early January? 12· ·A.· No. 13· ·Q.· Do you know why? 14· ·A.· No, they were excluding us from almost everything 15· · · ·at that point. 16· ·Q.· And who was "us" when you refer to us? 17· ·A.· Jennifer Boucher and I.· Town administration. 18· ·Q.· When did you come to understand or realize what the 19· · · ·explanation was for not including you, or as you 20· · · ·put it, excluding you, from those nonpublic 21· · · ·sessions in early January? 22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 23· ·Q.· You can answer. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 99 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 101.
    ·1· ·A.· Itwould have been after the board of 2023 was ·2· · · ·constituted and they made the decision to request ·3· · · ·all information from the DTC law firm that they had ·4· · · ·in their possession related to anything that had to ·5· · · ·do with Haverhill. ·6· ·Q.· Okay.· And did you have an opportunity to go ·7· · · ·through that information? ·8· ·A.· All of it. ·9· ·Q.· Okay.· And what did that information say with 10· · · ·respect to why the board of selectmen back in 11· · · ·January of 2022, as you put it was excluding both 12· · · ·you and Ms. Boucher from those nonpublic meetings? 13· ·A.· Because ultimately their goal was to just fire me. 14· ·Q.· Based upon your review of those documents that were 15· · · ·received, why was the board seeking or looking to 16· · · ·fire you as far as, again, what you gathered from 17· · · ·your review of those documents? 18· ·A.· My opinion again or ... 19· ·Q.· What you got from those documents?· What did those 20· · · ·documents say? 21· ·A.· I didn't get a lot from those documents other than 22· · · ·the fact that certain board members just came into 23· · · ·office wanting, with the goal of wanting to fire BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 100 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 102.
    ·1· · ··the town manager. ·2· ·Q.· So there wasn't any reason for it? ·3· ·A.· Their reason, there wasn't any good reasons.· There ·4· · · ·were some, there was some information tied to ·5· · · ·Article 27 and 28 and their displeasure with the ·6· · · ·fact that the board of 2021 and previous boards to ·7· · · ·that were oppositional to the Woodsville Fire ·8· · · ·District and the funding of Woodsville Highway and ·9· · · ·Fire. 10· ·Q.· Was it, who in the board or who was on the board 11· · · ·that you're understanding were looking to fire you 12· · · ·at that point? 13· ·A.· From those documents? 14· ·Q.· Yes. 15· ·A.· Kevin Knapp definitely, but also Steve Robbins and 16· · · ·Katie. 17· ·Q.· Okay. 18· ·A.· Little bit of Mike, but he was pretty good at not 19· · · ·responding to things clearly. 20· ·Q.· And which of those three people, because you named 21· · · ·three with certainty, Steve Robbin, Kevin Knapp, 22· · · ·Katie Williams, which of those three board members 23· · · ·have a connection to or with Woodsville Village BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 101 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 103.
    ·1· · ··District? ·2· ·A.· All of them. ·3· ·Q.· Okay.· How does Steve Robbins have a connection? ·4· ·A.· He lives in Woodsville Fire District, has a ·5· · · ·business in the Woodsville Fire District, and he ·6· · · ·works for the Woodsville Fire District as does most ·7· · · ·of his family. ·8· ·Q.· Okay.· What information or evidence is there that ·9· · · ·his connection in and to Woodsville actually had a 10· · · ·bearing on his actions and communications as a 11· · · ·member of the board of selectmen in 2022? 12· ·A.· That I witnessed? 13· ·Q.· That you know of. 14· ·A.· Well, for example, going to the Woodsville Fire 15· · · ·District to sign documents instead of the town 16· · · ·hall. 17· ·Q.· Okay. 18· ·A.· When he would refer to situations, he would say 19· · · ·"we," and when he said we, he meant the Woodsville 20· · · ·Fire District.· He would go to Woodsville Fire 21· · · ·District meetings and in the minutes is represented 22· · · ·as speaking on behalf of Woodsville Fire District 23· · · ·against the Town; for example, at an annual meeting BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 102 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 104.
    ·1· · ··he's quoted as saying he would never work for the ·2· · · ·Town of Haverhill, and the Town of Haverhill would ·3· · · ·never be an entity that he would be associated ·4· · · ·with. ·5· · · · · · · · ·There were lots of examples of him being ·6· · · ·biased.· That's while he was on the board. ·7· ·Q.· So as far as signing, you said signing documents in ·8· · · ·or at the Woodsville Village District office, how ·9· · · ·does that have a bearing on his impartiality? 10· ·A.· Because he signed an engagement letter for the Town 11· · · ·of Haverhill as a representative of the Haverhill 12· · · ·Select Board on a Sunday in the Woodsville Fire 13· · · ·District office at the same time as district 14· · · ·commissioners.· It had never, it doesn't happen 15· · · ·like that. 16· ·Q.· How is that an indication of a lack of 17· · · ·impartiality?· Is there some proscription against 18· · · ·signing documents on Sundays? 19· ·A.· In an official capacity of a town official in a 20· · · ·district office in a matter that is between 21· · · ·Woodsville and Haverhill?· I don't know.· It seemed 22· · · ·from everybody's perspective that I have ever heard 23· · · ·from, that seemed odd. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 103 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 105.
    ·1· ·Q.· Whatwas the document that he signed? ·2· ·A.· The engagement letter. ·3· ·Q.· What's in the, who drafted it?· Who generated the ·4· · · ·document that he signed? ·5· ·A.· It's my understanding from the documents we ·6· · · ·received from DTC that Christopher Hawkins produced ·7· · · ·that document. ·8· ·Q.· Okay.· Is there, what is there for a requirement ·9· · · ·that documents relating to the Town of Haverhill 10· · · ·have to be signed in Town of Haverhill's office? 11· ·A.· There's no proscription.· It's just historical. 12· · · ·It's just the way that it's done.· Usually the 13· · · ·documents come to the town office, they are signed 14· · · ·in the town office and they leave from the town 15· · · ·office. 16· ·Q.· Okay. 17· ·A.· So that they stay in our custody and control. 18· ·Q.· Okay.· What about that document is evidence of or 19· · · ·indication of his lack of impartiality with respect 20· · · ·to the Town of Haverhill? 21· ·A.· Well, directly that there is no evidence that there 22· · · ·was ever a public meeting or a quorum of the board. 23· · · ·And there's no minute on record that ever gave him BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 104 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 106.
    ·1· · ··authority to even sign the document. ·2· ·Q.· What was the scope of legal representation for that ·3· · · ·document to hire DTC Lawyers? ·4· ·A.· What was the scope of the agreement? ·5· ·Q.· Yeah, what subject matters, what things did the ·6· · · ·board hire DTC to do? ·7· ·A.· The, what was in the final engagement letter? ·8· ·Q.· The one that he signed. ·9· ·A.· Was that, I'd have to go back and look at the 10· · · ·document, but I believe it was in general the tax 11· · · ·rate setting matter and personnel matters. 12· ·Q.· And the personnel matters related to who? 13· ·A.· It didn't specify. 14· ·Q.· Okay. 15· ·A.· And that was added to that in the iterations of 16· · · ·that engagement letter that were produced. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· Is there, what, if any, indication that the 18· · · ·document was revised has anything to do with, I 19· · · ·guess, an allegation that he was not impartial with 20· · · ·respect to the Town of Haverhill? 21· ·A.· The statement that it was revised is just that you 22· · · ·had asked about personnel matters, and that 23· · · ·particular subject was added to a later iteration BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 105 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 107.
    ·1· · ··of the letter. ·2· ·Q.· Okay.· Why is it unusual or abnormal that a ·3· · · ·document would go through revisions? ·4· ·A.· Documents do go through revisions, but usually when ·5· · · ·you're producing a document like that, you know ·6· · · ·what your scope is; you know why you're being, why ·7· · · ·you're looking for an attorney. ·8· ·Q.· But it's not uncommon for documents to be revised ·9· · · ·and things to be added or subtracted; correct? 10· ·A.· Yeah, that's true. 11· ·Q.· Okay.· With respect to Woodsville Fire 12· · · ·District/Village District and the meetings that you 13· · · ·talked about, he I guess was recorded or quoted as 14· · · ·saying he would never work for the Town of 15· · · ·Haverhill.· What does that have to do with or what 16· · · ·bearing does that have to do, as far as you see it, 17· · · ·with his role as a member of the board of selectmen 18· · · ·for Haverhill? 19· ·A.· If, the minutes I'm talking about are the annual 20· · · ·meeting minutes for the District of Woodsville and 21· · · ·his attendance there and the statements made were 22· · · ·derogatory with regard to the Town of Haverhill, 23· · · ·which he was serving on as a, on the board of BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 106 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 108.
    ·1· · ··selectmen at the time.· That shows bias. ·2· ·Q.· Okay.· How does that show bias as far as he would ·3· · · ·never work for the Town of Haverhill?· What did he ·4· · · ·mean by that? ·5· ·A.· I don't want to infer on what he meant by that.· It ·6· · · ·was just derogatory and negative. ·7· ·Q.· Okay.· Why is it derogatory or negative for someone ·8· · · ·to say I wouldn't work for that particular employer ·9· · · ·or that particular employer or that company? 10· ·A.· There was more to the statement, so I would have to 11· · · ·go back and pull the minutes. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you recall what there was for more to the 13· · · ·statements? 14· ·A.· I don't remember his exact words, but it was very 15· · · ·derogatory to the town that he was representing on 16· · · ·the board. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· But you don't recall how or why it was 18· · · ·interrogatory? 19· ·A.· I have to read the statements.· It's in the 20· · · ·minutes.· And there's more than that.· He's also 21· · · ·made statements in the newspaper that were 22· · · ·derogatory toward the town that he was serving. 23· ·Q.· And what were those comments that he made? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 107 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 109.
    ·1· ·A.· I'dhave to go back to the newspapers and pull ·2· · · ·them. ·3· ·Q.· So you don't remember? ·4· ·A.· I don't remember the exact statements. ·5· ·Q.· So how do you remember that the statements that he ·6· · · ·made were derogatory, then? ·7· ·A.· Because they were offensive. ·8· ·Q.· In what way? ·9· ·A.· In general.· Not just to me, but, and it wasn't 10· · · ·about me; it was about the Town of Haverhill. 11· ·Q.· But you don't recall what he said or what it was 12· · · ·relating to? 13· ·A.· I would have to go back and find the minutes and 14· · · ·find the news article. 15· ·Q.· Okay.· So as you understood it, back in beginning 16· · · ·of January 2023 with respect to Chris Hawkins, how 17· · · ·did DTC, the law firm, have a conflict of interest 18· · · ·because of Chris Hawkins being employed there? 19· ·A.· Why would I see that as a conflict, is that the 20· · · ·question? 21· ·Q.· I'm asking how did DTC as a law firm have a 22· · · ·conflict of interest with Chris Hawkins being 23· · · ·employed or a partner there, being an attorney in BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 108 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 110.
    ·1· · ··DTC Lawyers January of 2023? ·2· ·A.· So as far as DTC attorneys, the fact that Chris ·3· · · ·Hawkins was on staff was not necessarily, didn't ·4· · · ·create a conflict that was insuperable.· And we ·5· · · ·made it clear that it was Chris Hawkins that could ·6· · · ·not clear conflicts and that Chris Hawkins should ·7· · · ·not be involved if the Town was to hire DTC ·8· · · ·attorneys. ·9· ·Q.· So back in January of 2023 with the board of 10· · · ·selectmen acting that they had retained or hired 11· · · ·DTC to represent the Town in connection with the 12· · · ·DRA tax rate setting matter, what about DTC 13· · · ·addressing or working on that tax rate setting 14· · · ·matter would involve or implicate the Woodsville 15· · · ·litigation? 16· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 17· ·Q.· You can answer. 18· ·A.· So the tax rate setting matter was directly 19· · · ·connected to Articles 27 and 28; and like I said 20· · · ·earlier, the Articles 27 and 28 was directly tied 21· · · ·to the funding by the Town of the Woodsville Fire 22· · · ·District's operations, which was tied to the 23· · · ·litigation and the changes to legislation.· It was BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 109 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 111.
    ·1· · ··all connected. ·2· · · · · · · · ·And because of that, Chris Hawkins had ·3· · · ·litigated against the Town.· At the time this ·4· · · ·started we were still at the tail end of settlement ·5· · · ·for the litigation itself.· Article 27 and 28 had ·6· · · ·already surfaced as an issue, and so it was all ·7· · · ·tied, all tied together. ·8· ·Q.· Articles 27, Warrant Articles 27 and 28 did not ·9· · · ·relate to the same dollars or the same dollar 10· · · ·amounts as what was involved in Woodsville's 11· · · ·lawsuit against Town of Haverhill, right? 12· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 13· ·Q.· You can answer. 14· ·A.· It was over the same issue, which was the Town of 15· · · ·Haverhill funding Woodsville's operations for fire 16· · · ·and highway using Haverhill tax dollars.· It was 17· · · ·the same legal issue. 18· ·Q.· Okay.· But it wasn't the same dollar amount; it 19· · · ·wasn't the same, sort of, pot of money, if you 20· · · ·will, that Woodsville had brought the lawsuit 21· · · ·against the Town of Haverhill for, though? 22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 23· ·Q.· You can answer. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 110 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 112.
    ·1· ·A.· Itwasn't the same, it wasn't the same litigation; ·2· · · ·it wasn't the same lawsuit. ·3· ·Q.· Right.· And then there was, you know, legislation, ·4· · · ·as you put it, there was a bill, there was an act, ·5· · · ·and it was signed into law? ·6· ·A.· Uh-huh.· Yes. ·7· ·Q.· And then, I almost said well after that, but after ·8· · · ·that Warrant Articles 27 and 28 were submitted by ·9· · · ·Woodsville to the town clerk to get put on the 10· · · ·ballot for the town, annual town meeting; correct? 11· ·A.· Yes. 12· ·Q.· All right.· And those two articles, Article 27 and 13· · · ·28, had different amounts in them than what was 14· · · ·involved in the lawsuit; correct? 15· ·A.· Yes. 16· ·Q.· Okay.· And Articles 27 and 28 were the result of or 17· · · ·came out of what was put into, what was signed into 18· · · ·law; correct? 19· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 20· ·Q.· You can answer. 21· ·A.· What they believed was included in law, yes. 22· ·Q.· They believe, what they submitted as Warrant 23· · · ·Articles 27 and 28 the proponents of, or who BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 111 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 113.
    ·1· · ··submitted it, believed that the basis for those two ·2· · · ·warrant articles was provided for right in the act? ·3· ·A.· Woodsville Fire District believed that, yes. ·4· ·Q.· Okay.· So what, as your understanding is, what ·5· · · ·would Chris Hawkins in January of 2023 have done in ·6· · · ·connection with the DRA rate setting issue that ·7· · · ·would have involved the legislation, sorry, the ·8· · · ·lawsuit that Woodsville brought against Haverhill ·9· · · ·that already had been settled? 10· ·A.· So the negotiations and the settlement agreement 11· · · ·had been agreed to, but the final payment had not 12· · · ·been made yet on, if we are just talking about with 13· · · ·the lawsuit, and if we had failed to make that 14· · · ·second payment, we would have ended up back in 15· · · ·court over the same matter.· So technically that 16· · · ·situation was not concluded yet. 17· ·Q.· That second of two payments; correct? 18· ·A.· That would have finalized that litigation, yes. 19· ·Q.· But the lawsuit itself had been resolved, had been 20· · · ·settled; correct? 21· ·A.· There had been a settlement negotiated. 22· ·Q.· Okay.· And there had been -- 23· ·A.· And a settlement agreement had been agreed to, yes. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 112 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 114.
    ·1· ·Q.· Okay.·And the, what's referred to as docket ·2· · · ·markings are an agreement for the docket to be ·3· · · ·marked as settled and closed, that document had ·4· · · ·been filed with the court? ·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form? ·6· ·A.· I don't remember the date that was filed. ·7· ·Q.· Okay.· If it was or if that document had been filed ·8· · · ·with the court on or before, you know, January 12th ·9· · · ·of 2023, that lawsuit would be closed and done; 10· · · ·correct? 11· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 12· ·Q.· You can answer. 13· ·A.· Okay.· That particular lawsuit, yes. 14· ·Q.· All right.· So is there, based upon your 15· · · ·understanding of things and your position, is there 16· · · ·anything that, any issue, any matter, is there 17· · · ·anything that Chris Hawkins while working at DTC 18· · · ·could represent the Town of Haverhill on or in? 19· ·A.· Anything not related to the Woodsville Fire 20· · · ·District and the fire district funding by the Town 21· · · ·of Haverhill. 22· ·Q.· Okay.· If Chris Hawkins performed any legal work or 23· · · ·legal services on behalf of the Town of Haverhill BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 113 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 115.
    ·1· · ··in connection with the DRA rate setting issue or ·2· · · ·problem, how would he have been interacting or ·3· · · ·going up against, as the phrase is used, Woodsville ·4· · · ·Village District? ·5· ·A.· Say that again. ·6· ·Q.· Yeah.· In connection with the DRA tax rate setting ·7· · · ·issue, Chris Hawkins wouldn't have had to go up ·8· · · ·against or interact with Woodsville Village ·9· · · ·District; it was Peter Roth or people at the DRA; 10· · · ·correct? 11· ·A.· Directly, yes. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· Is there any indication that he would have 13· · · ·had to have, go up against or interact with 14· · · ·Woodsville Village District in connection with the 15· · · ·DRA tax rate setting issue? 16· ·A.· It was possible. 17· ·Q.· How? 18· ·A.· Because the board of selectmen who are able to file 19· · · ·appeals related to the tax rate, and one of the 20· · · ·things that the Woodsville Fire District was 21· · · ·attempting to do was appeal the town's tax rate 22· · · ·because of the tax rate setting matter being 23· · · ·identified and pointing right at Article 27 and 28 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 114 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 116.
    ·1· · ··related to the Woodsville Fire District. ·2· ·Q.· So who in that, in what you just explained, who, ·3· · · ·then, would have been filing or who would have ·4· · · ·filed that appeal? ·5· ·A.· It would have been my office on behalf of the board ·6· · · ·of selectmen. ·7· ·Q.· Okay.· And if that happened, then there would have ·8· · · ·been a conflict of interest? ·9· ·A.· No, I think that there was a conflict of interest 10· · · ·because of Chris Hawkins' previous and previous 11· · · ·connections to the Woodsville lawsuit; and then of 12· · · ·course the Articles 27 and 28 and everything else 13· · · ·that came from that. 14· ·Q.· Okay.· And you see those as -- 15· ·A.· Interconnected. 16· ·Q.· -- directly connected one to the other, sort of 17· · · ·going back in a timeline; is that correct? 18· ·A.· They all overlapped.· They each overlapped and they 19· · · ·were all interconnected because they all related to 20· · · ·the same funding matter. 21· ·Q.· Okay. 22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Are we switching gears here? 23· · · ·Are we at a good time to take a break? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 115 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 117.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· We can if you need to, want ·2· · · ·to. ·3· · · · · · · · ·(Recess taken.) ·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Back on the record. ·5· ·BY MR. SOUCY: ·6· ·Q.· Ms. Codling, we broke for lunch.· We are back on ·7· · · ·the record.· You're still under oath and we will ·8· · · ·pick up with your deposition. ·9· · · · · · · · ·In connection with question that I asked 10· · · ·you before about whether the lawsuit between 11· · · ·Woodsville and the Town of Haverhill, you at that 12· · · ·point in time said that you couldn't recall.· In 13· · · ·your affidavit to the motion for summary judgment, 14· · · ·paragraph 14, you wrote and attested to, In May 15· · · ·2022, the Woodsville litigation was conditionally 16· · · ·settled requiring Haverhill to make future payments 17· · · ·to Woodsville.· May of 2022 that sound accurate? 18· ·A.· Yes. 19· ·Q.· Okay.· With respect to your role as town manager 20· · · ·and your understanding of the board of selectmen 21· · · ·delegating over to you the role and responsibility 22· · · ·for handling or making decisions with respect to 23· · · ·legal matters relating to Woodsville, your BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 116 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 118.
    ·1· · ··understanding is that you had the ability to sign ·2· · · ·contracts and waive any conflicts of interest, or ·3· · · ·those sorts of things.· That assignment wouldn't ·4· · · ·also have included you having a responsibility for ·5· · · ·signing a contract to retain either an attorney or ·6· · · ·a law firm in connection with any review of your ·7· · · ·performance or an employment issue or terminating ·8· · · ·your employment with the Town. ·9· · · · · · · · ·That is delegation from the board of 10· · · ·selectmen regarding legal matters related to 11· · · ·Woodsville wouldn't also have included that role as 12· · · ·far as hiring a law firm to review your employment 13· · · ·and give advice as to terminating you or not; would 14· · · ·it have? 15· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 16· ·Q.· Go ahead. 17· ·A.· So normally that would have been delegated, most of 18· · · ·that would have been delegated to Jennifer Boucher. 19· ·Q.· Okay.· And that's what I was going to ask.· So if 20· · · ·not you, especially when something is looking right 21· · · ·back at that employee, it goes, generally the 22· · · ·flowchart, if you will, it would go somewhere; so 23· · · ·where would that have been gone?· It would have BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 117 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 119.
    ·1· · ··fell to the assistant town manager when the town ·2· · · ·had that form of government? ·3· ·A.· Yes, normally.· So it was, yeah.· It would go to ·4· · · ·Jennifer Boucher -- ·5· ·Q.· Okay. ·6· ·A.· As the assistant town manager for just me. ·7· ·Q.· Right.· And I'm presuming back when the town had ·8· · · ·that form the government, if the board of selectmen ·9· · · ·were focused on terminating, getting legal advice 10· · · ·and terminating the assistant town manager, signing 11· · · ·of the contract still would have been with you? 12· ·A.· No, it would have remained with Jennifer Boucher. 13· ·Q.· Even if the board of selectmen wanted legal advice 14· · · ·regarding whether to terminate the assistant town 15· · · ·manager? 16· ·A.· If it was the assistant town manager, it would have 17· · · ·been on me. 18· ·Q.· Okay. 19· ·A.· And so in this regard, Jennifer Boucher would work 20· · · ·with the Mitchell Municipal Group and our HR 21· · · ·attorney, Naomi Butterfield, who we already had on 22· · · ·retainer. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· So when the town had the town manager form BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 118 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 120.
    ·1· · ··of government, who, if anybody, could the board of ·2· · · ·selectmen have had the power to retain to provide ·3· · · ·legal advice about your employment and whether or ·4· · · ·not to terminate you? ·5· ·A.· Can you state that again? ·6· ·Q.· With respect to the board of selectmen back when ·7· · · ·the town had town manager form of government, who ·8· · · ·or did the board of selectmen have any power to go ·9· · · ·out on its own and retain legal counsel to provide 10· · · ·legal advice as to whether or not to take any 11· · · ·action with respect to the town manager, whether it 12· · · ·was you or not in that role? 13· ·A.· I would say they could have in a publicly warned 14· · · ·meeting voted to retain an attorney for the purpose 15· · · ·for of performance matters if we weren't already 16· · · ·engaged with an HR attorney at another law firm. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· Is there any other type or what other type 18· · · ·of meeting could the board of selectmen in that 19· · · ·scenario with a town manager form of government, 20· · · ·what other type of meeting, if any, could the board 21· · · ·of selectmen have voted to hire a lawyer to provide 22· · · ·it with legal counsel regarding whether or not to 23· · · ·terminate or fire the town manager? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 119 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 121.
    ·1· ·A.· Tomake a motion and take a formal action it would ·2· · · ·have had to have been a publicly warned meeting. ·3· ·Q.· So that isn't something that the board of selectmen ·4· · · ·could have done in a nonpublic session? ·5· ·A.· That's a publicly warned meeting, yup. ·6· ·Q.· But in a public session of a public meeting, ·7· · · ·though? ·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection to form. ·9· ·Q.· Sorry, nonpublic. 10· ·A.· No.· I'm not sure exactly. 11· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· The question is a double 12· · · ·negative. 13· ·Q.· Yeah, so it would have, the board of selectmen 14· · · ·would have had to do it during a public meeting, 15· · · ·but because of 91-A or something else, they would 16· · · ·have done it during a nonpublic session? 17· ·A.· Typically they would discuss in a nonpublic 18· · · ·session, come out into a public session and make a 19· · · ·motion to do something like that so it was on the 20· · · ·record. 21· ·Q.· Okay.· And is that the only way in which the board 22· · · ·of selectmen with that form of government could 23· · · ·have done it? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 120 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 122.
    ·1· ·A.· That'smy understanding, yes. ·2· ·Q.· And with respect to the DRA tax rate setting issue, ·3· · · ·how much of the Town of Haverhill did it affect? ·4· ·A.· All of Haverhill. ·5· ·Q.· And that would have or did include the separate ·6· · · ·special-purpose districts? ·7· ·A.· They are all within the Town of Haverhill, yep. ·8· ·Q.· When did the Town, if ever, pay Drummond Woodsum ·9· · · ·invoices for the legal services that it provided in 10· · · ·connection with the DRA tax setting issue? 11· ·A.· When did we pay them? 12· ·Q.· Yeah.· Well, the town, yes? 13· ·A.· I would have to see the invoices and look at the 14· · · ·pay requisition. 15· ·Q.· Do you know if the Town has paid all of them? 16· ·A.· For Drummond Woodsum? 17· ·Q.· Yes. 18· ·A.· Yes. 19· ·Q.· I will give you a document that was labeled as 20· · · ·Exhibit 31 to the Town's Motions for Summary 21· · · ·Judgment.· Just take a look at that and let me know 22· · · ·when you're done.· Let me know and we will mark it 23· · · ·with an exhibit sticker. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 121 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 123.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · ·(Exhibit 4, 1/13/23 Email, marked for ·2· · · ·identification.) ·3· ·Q.· So you just had a chance to look at the two-page ·4· · · ·document that's been marked as Exhibit 4 to your ·5· · · ·deposition; correct? ·6· ·A.· Yes. ·7· ·Q.· And this is an email at the top from Christopher ·8· · · ·Hawkins to Lynnette Macomber is dated January 13, ·9· · · ·2023? 10· ·A.· Yes. 11· ·Q.· Okay.· Further down there is an email string or 12· · · ·chain.· Further down there is a different email 13· · · ·below that, which is from Peter Roth at New 14· · · ·Hampshire DRA, and it was also January 13, 2023, 15· · · ·but at 5:34 p.m., and it's addressed to Eric Maher 16· · · ·and CC'd to Chris Hawkins; do you see that? 17· ·A.· I do. 18· ·Q.· Okay.· And it appears to be it was also sent to and 19· · · ·addressed to a Laura Lombardi at New Hampshire 20· · · ·Department of Justice, or the AG's office, and then 21· · · ·to another attorney, a third attorney, Chris 22· · · ·Hawkins, and then the fourth attorney Briana 23· · · ·Matuszko.· Do you see that? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 122 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 124.
    ·1· ·A.· Ido. ·2· ·Q.· Okay.· And down at the body of that message it ·3· · · ·indicates that on Tuesday, January 17, 2023, the ·4· · · ·department, or DRA as we've been referring to them, ·5· · · ·intends to set the tax rate.· That's the tax ·6· · · ·setting rate that we have been talking about? ·7· ·A.· Uh-huh.· Yes. ·8· ·Q.· And do you have any idea why Peter Roth at DRA only ·9· · · ·sent this to lawyers at DTC and not any at Drummond 10· · · ·Woodsum? 11· ·A.· The knowledge that I have related to that was just 12· · · ·that Chris Hawkins had been insistent that the DRA 13· · · ·communicate with them about the town's tax rate. 14· ·Q.· Okay.· Peter Roth was also, had received 15· · · ·communications from the attorneys at Drummond 16· · · ·Woodsum as well, I understand, right? 17· ·A.· Peter Roth was working pretty closely with Drummond 18· · · ·Woodsum on our behalf. 19· ·Q.· Okay.· But you don't know why Peter didn't also CC 20· · · ·them when they are letting them know that the DRA 21· · · ·is going to be setting the tax rate? 22· ·A.· I don't know why with this particular email, no. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· When, if ever, did any representation, legal BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 123 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 125.
    ·1· · ··representation that Drummond Woodsum carried out or ·2· · · ·performed for the Town of Haverhill in connection ·3· · · ·with the tax setting issue, when, if ever, did ·4· · · ·Drummond Woodsum have to take the position or ·5· · · ·advance the position that the Woodsville either ·6· · · ·Fire District, Woodsville Village District didn't ·7· · · ·legally exist?· Did that ever happen? ·8· ·A.· From my experience none of us ever said that. ·9· ·Q.· Did Drummond Woodsum ever have to advance that or 10· · · ·make that argument? 11· ·A.· No. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· Did the Town of Haverhill ever ask Drummond 13· · · ·Woodsum to advance that argument or make that 14· · · ·argument? 15· ·A.· No. 16· ·Q.· Okay.· And certainly not in connectin with, just to 17· · · ·be clear, not in connection with the work that it 18· · · ·performed in connection with the DRA tax rate 19· · · ·setting? 20· ·A.· Nope. 21· ·Q.· Okay.· On January 13th of 2023, Ms. Boucher sent an 22· · · ·email to Attorney Maher at DTC in which she 23· · · ·explained that both you and she were in the town BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 124 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 126.
    ·1· · ··offices and Mr. Garofalo came in.· There was a ·2· · · ·discussion about hiring or retaining DTC in ·3· · · ·connection with the tax rate setting issue. ·4· · · · · · · · ·And according to this email, Mr. Garofalo ·5· · · ·stated that the board had not hired or retained DTC ·6· · · ·in connection with that issue.· Do you, first of ·7· · · ·all, did that conversation occur as you recall? ·8· ·A.· Yes. ·9· ·Q.· So you were present for it? 10· ·A.· I was. 11· ·Q.· Okay.· How did that whole conversation come about? 12· · · ·Just take us back to that moment. 13· ·A.· Yup.· So at that time Fred was coming in the office 14· · · ·quite frequently, just checking in, and he had 15· · · ·always done that since the day I was hired. 16· · · · · · · · ·And so in regards to that, he came in to 17· · · ·just kind of vent to us his frustration of what was 18· · · ·going on, and we brought up to him the question 19· · · ·because of the Cinde Warmington phone call we had 20· · · ·received where she had stated that Chris Hawkins 21· · · ·was our attorney, which was the first we had heard 22· · · ·that. 23· · · · · · · · ·And so we pointedly ask the chair of the BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 125 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 127.
    ·1· · ··select board, which he was at the time, Did you or ·2· · · ·did you not take action to retain DTC, and he said ·3· · · ·absolutely not.· Continuing working with Drummond ·4· · · ·Woodsum. ·5· ·Q.· Okay.· Was that the end of the conversation and ·6· · · ·what he said? ·7· ·A.· That was the gist, the most substantive statements ·8· · · ·that he made, but he was frustrated with the board ·9· · · ·at that point. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you recall when you found out or you 11· · · ·discovered that the board of selectmen was looking 12· · · ·at or considering terminating you in the position 13· · · ·as town manager? 14· ·A.· I didn't find out about that until we acquired all 15· · · ·the documents from Drummond Woodsum in 2023. 16· ·Q.· What do you mean when you acquired the documents, 17· · · ·from where? 18· ·A.· The board of selectmen made the, took action to get 19· · · ·all of the documents Drummond Woodsum had in their 20· · · ·possession is where that became explicitly clear to 21· · · ·me that that's what the board had been trying to 22· · · ·do. 23· ·Q.· A request to Drummond Woodsum? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 126 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 128.
    ·1· ·A.· No,sorry, DTC. ·2· ·Q.· Just wanted to make sure -- ·3· ·A.· Another D word.· That's why there was that look on ·4· · · ·your face. ·5· ·Q.· Yeah. ·6· ·A.· DTC.· The board of 2023 made the request for ·7· · · ·documents.· That's when I became acutely aware and ·8· · · ·had evidence that that's what they were trying to ·9· · · ·do. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· So after the board of selectmen made a 11· · · ·request to DTC for a complete copy of the file of 12· · · ·whatever kind of request it was, and DTC produced a 13· · · ·copy of those documents, do you know if they went 14· · · ·initially went back to the board of selectmen or to 15· · · ·your office?· Where did they come in from or ... 16· ·A.· They were mailed to the town administration office 17· · · ·in big boxes. 18· ·Q.· Okay.· So did someone point the boxes out in the 19· · · ·hallway to you or something like that that these 20· · · ·things had come in?· In whose office?· Who was the 21· · · ·one to receive them? 22· ·A.· It would have been the front desk clerk. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you know where they went and who looked BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 127 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 129.
    ·1· · ··at them after that? ·2· ·A.· They went into my office and Jennifer Boucher and I ·3· · · ·looked through the boxes.· And then we put them in ·4· · · ·binders in chronological order, or had someone put ·5· · · ·them in binders in chronological order. ·6· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you recall month and year when that would ·7· · · ·have occurred as far as, again, when you went ·8· · · ·through or going through those and found out? ·9· ·A.· It would have the summer of 2023, I believe. 10· ·Q.· Okay. 11· ·A.· Early summer of '23. 12· ·Q.· What conversation, if any, did you have with 13· · · ·members of the board of selectmen after you 14· · · ·discovered what was in those documents from DTC 15· · · ·that the board had been considering or looking at 16· · · ·terminating you in that position? 17· ·A.· What conversations did I have with the board? 18· ·Q.· Yes. 19· ·A.· Well, specifically we had them put in binders and 20· · · ·then they were put in the middle room for the board 21· · · ·to review.· And so obviously I would have made them 22· · · ·aware that we had received the documents they 23· · · ·requested and they were ready for their review in BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 128 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 130.
    ·1· · ··the middle room. ·2· · · · · · · · ·And that they, after reading through, ·3· · · ·supported everything that Fred Garofalo had said ·4· · · ·with regards to what the board of 2022 was trying ·5· · · ·to do and my feelings through that whole time. ·6· ·Q.· Okay.· So what's your recollection of ·7· · · ·Mr. Garofalo's position with respect to the board ·8· · · ·of selectmen hiring or retaining DTC for the rate ·9· · · ·setting issue and/or personnel issue, we will just 10· · · ·characterize it as or refer to it as?· What's your 11· · · ·understanding of what his position on retaining DTC 12· · · ·was? 13· ·A.· So when he would come in to see me and speak with 14· · · ·Jennifer and I, he made it very clear he was 15· · · ·oppositional to that.· He didn't think it was 16· · · ·necessary. 17· ·Q.· And that was direct conversations with him? 18· ·A.· That was him coming into the, uh-huh. 19· ·Q.· Where does the Town currently stand with respect to 20· · · ·payment of the invoices that DTC has submitted to 21· · · ·the Town? 22· ·A.· The invoices are still unpaid. 23· ·Q.· And whose decision is it to not pay those invoices? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 129 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 131.
    ·1· ·A.· Atthis point it's with the board of selectmen. ·2· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you know when the last time was that they ·3· · · ·considered or took up the issue as to pay or not ·4· · · ·pay those? ·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·6· ·Q.· You can answer. ·7· ·A.· Specifically, I couldn't recall. ·8· ·Q.· Okay.· Has that, the issue as to whether the Town ·9· · · ·should pay or not pay DTC invoices, has that been 10· · · ·taken up by the current composition of the board of 11· · · ·selectmen? 12· ·A.· It's something that obviously gets discussed during 13· · · ·this, any meetings they have related to this 14· · · ·matter. 15· ·Q.· Okay.· So this is document, it's an email attached 16· · · ·to the Town's motion for summary judgment, Exhibit 17· · · ·No. 54.· If you could take a look at that and then 18· · · ·just let me know when you're done. 19· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 5, 7/12/23 Email, marked for 20· · · ·identification.) 21· ·Q.· Okay.· You've had a chance to take a look at this 22· · · ·four-page document with your attorney? 23· ·A.· Yes. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 130 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 132.
    ·1· ·Q.· Andthe third page in, counting the cover sheet, ·2· · · ·page, down at the bottom it's page 2 of a chain of ·3· · · ·emails.· Second-to-last paragraph, the bottom ·4· · · ·portion of it, email between Attorney Chris Hawkins ·5· · · ·and Naomi Butterfield with the Mitchell Group, the ·6· · · ·last, very last sentence of that second-to-last ·7· · · ·paragraph says, I was assured that there is no ·8· · · ·intent to refuse to pay your fees.· The board and ·9· · · ·Brigitte just want to know what the fees were for 10· · · ·as the narratives were general and those who met 11· · · ·with you are now gone, (except for Kevin).· Do you 12· · · ·see that sentence? 13· ·A.· I do. 14· ·Q.· When did you tell Attorney Butterfield that the 15· · · ·Town didn't have an intent to refuse to pay DTC's 16· · · ·fees? 17· ·A.· I don't recall saying that to her.· That might have 18· · · ·been what she got out of our conversation. 19· ·Q.· Okay.· How many conversations or emails, so how 20· · · ·many conversations or communications have you had 21· · · ·with Attorney Butterfield regarding DTC's invoices 22· · · ·regarding the rate setting issue or the personnel 23· · · ·issue? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 131 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 133.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·2· ·Q.· You can answer. ·3· ·A.· There weren't many because Naomi doesn't represent ·4· · · ·us for Woodsville-related matters.· Chris Hawkins ·5· · · ·had independently reached out to her. ·6· ·Q.· Do you recall having any conversations or ·7· · · ·communications with Attorney Butterfield regarding ·8· · · ·DTC invoices? ·9· ·A.· I think it was just this one when she got this 10· · · ·email or request from Chris Hawkins, and she called 11· · · ·me to say, What is this. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· In that same sentence it says, The board and 13· · · ·Brigitte just want to know what the fees were for. 14· · · · · · · · ·As of today do you, what do you have, if 15· · · ·anything, for questions or lack of clarity as far 16· · · ·as what the work that was done was for?· Again, 17· · · ·within the context of that sentence. 18· ·A.· All right.· From my perspective there was no work, 19· · · ·but the boxes kind of explained what they were 20· · · ·trying to bill us for; we could correlate. 21· ·Q.· Can you explain in a little bit more detail what 22· · · ·you mean by "there was no work"? 23· ·A.· From my perspective DTC wasn't working for us. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 132 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 134.
    ·1· · ··They didn't have authority to work for us. ·2· ·Q.· Okay. ·3· ·A.· And I wasn't involved with them. ·4· ·Q.· So is there, with all the documents that you've ·5· · · ·seen up to today, is, what do you have as far as ·6· · · ·any questions that DTC didn't draft the letters, ·7· · · ·didn't send out emails or have communications with ·8· · · ·people at DRA or Councilor Warmington or -- do you ·9· · · ·have, what do you have for any doubts that DTC did 10· · · ·not do work or perform services that are reflected 11· · · ·in the invoices? 12· ·A.· They didn't do that for the Town. 13· ·Q.· Okay.· So is it fair to say they may have done 14· · · ·those activities or done that stuff, but just not 15· · · ·for the Town; is that fair? 16· ·A.· That would be my perspective, yes. 17· ·Q.· What benefit or value do you see that the work or 18· · · ·services that DTC did as reflected in those 19· · · ·invoices, what value or benefit did the Town 20· · · ·receive? 21· ·A.· I don't think the Town received any benefit. I 22· · · ·think if anything it caused us a great deal of harm 23· · · ·in many ways. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 133 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 135.
    ·1· ·Q.· Okay.·You on behalf the Town retained Drummond ·2· · · ·Woodsum to, you can change the word but I'll use ·3· · · ·it, to use resolve the issue with respect to the ·4· · · ·DRA refusing to set the tax rate for the town; ·5· · · ·correct?· That's why you brought them on board? ·6· ·A.· We continue to use them, yes. ·7· ·Q.· But back then that's why you sort of retained them, ·8· · · ·to resolve that tax setting issue; correct? ·9· ·A.· Yes. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· And that tax rate setting issue with DRA was 11· · · ·resolved; correct? 12· ·A.· It was resolved. 13· ·Q.· Okay.· And according to the documents that you've 14· · · ·reviewed, that also is why the board of selectmen 15· · · ·believed that it had brought DTC on board was to 16· · · ·address or work on that same tax setting issue with 17· · · ·DRA, right. 18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 19· ·Q.· You can answer. 20· ·A.· DTC kept and a few selectmen kept telling the 21· · · ·public that.· That's why they wanted to work with 22· · · ·DTC, was to work on the tax rate setting matter. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· And, again, the tax setting issue was BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 134 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 136.
    ·1· · ··resolved with DRA? ·2· ·A.· Christine was able to resolve that for us, yes. ·3· ·Q.· That's your understanding, and I understand.· Okay. ·4· · · · · · · · ·So how is it that as far as your ·5· · · ·understanding that the services DTC provided or the ·6· · · ·work that it performed as its position is, on ·7· · · ·behalf of the Town of Haverhill, didn't provide any ·8· · · ·benefit?· I don't want to put the two together, ·9· · · ·didn't provide any benefit or harm, so let's just 10· · · ·take the first half.· So how did what they did did 11· · · ·not provide or supply the town with any benefit? 12· ·A.· From my perspective what they were attempting to do 13· · · ·was duplicative to everything that was already 14· · · ·happening with Drummond Woodsum and us working with 15· · · ·Peter Roth and the DRA directly. 16· · · · · · · · ·So we were already doing all of the 17· · · ·things that DTC suggested that they wanted to do 18· · · ·for the town. 19· ·Q.· Okay.· And how is it that Drummond Woodsum or what 20· · · ·did Drummond Woodsum do before DTC did the same 21· · · ·thing?· Do you have a list of the items or things? 22· ·A.· It's reflected in their invoices as well as emails 23· · · ·that are in the record.· We were meeting with her BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 135 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 137.
    ·1· · ··regularly.· She was talking with Peter Roth ·2· · · ·regularly.· That's reflected in his letter back to ·3· · · ·DTC that we found in the documents where he says ·4· · · ·she was instrumental in setting the tax rate ·5· · · ·despite what DTC was doing. ·6· ·Q.· And with respect to what you stated just a little ·7· · · ·while ago, it's your position that what DTC did in ·8· · · ·connection with what it was doing when it says it ·9· · · ·was working on behalf of the town regarding the tax 10· · · ·setting issue with DRA, in what ways did what DTC 11· · · ·did or perform harm the town or cause harm to the 12· · · ·town? 13· ·A.· Yeah, so there was harm to most of our 14· · · ·relationships, including Mitchell Group, the DRA, 15· · · ·Drummond Woodsum attorneys, everything became 16· · · ·labored.· Everyone was, all of those different 17· · · ·entities started protecting themselves and being 18· · · ·careful with communications and being guarded with 19· · · ·us. 20· · · · · · · · ·Also other surrounding municipalities 21· · · ·were hearing about things that were going on and it 22· · · ·started to cause labored communications and 23· · · ·relationships with the surrounding communities and BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 136 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 138.
    ·1· · ··with other organizations that we have to deal with ·2· · · ·on a daily basis, like the NHMA. ·3· ·Q.· The New Hampshire Municipal -- ·4· ·A.· Municipal Association.· All of those relationships ·5· · · ·became very careful and guarded. ·6· ·Q.· What do you mean they became careful and guarded? ·7· · · ·Can you explain that? ·8· ·A.· The way that we interacted changed.· You could ·9· · · ·tell, and actually when I reached out to Peter Roth 10· · · ·and asked for information, all of a sudden 11· · · ·everything had to be by RSA 91-A.· They were trying 12· · · ·to protect themselves from whatever was going on 13· · · ·here. 14· ·Q.· Why do you say they were trying to protect 15· · · ·themselves, and protect themselves from what? 16· ·A.· It was my sentiment that they changed how they 17· · · ·interacted with us. 18· ·Q.· Okay.· No one ever informed you that that's what 19· · · ·they were doing or why they were doing it? 20· ·A.· They wouldn't say that explicitly, no. 21· ·Q.· But they didn't say that? 22· ·A.· Not explicitly. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· And then with respect to other towns, how BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 137 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 139.
    ·1· · ··did interactions change and how do you know that it ·2· · · ·was because of this issue with DTC? ·3· ·A.· Everyone was, everyone was watching and everyone ·4· · · ·was starting to hone in on the fact that there were ·5· · · ·these labored issues with DTC and the Haverhill ·6· · · ·Select Board, and it just changed. ·7· · · · · · · · ·Relationships, I can't explain it.· It's ·8· · · ·just people start to treat you differently; they ·9· · · ·start to interact with you differently; they 10· · · ·communicate with you differently. 11· ·Q.· How so? 12· ·A.· The tone of conversations is not as cordial. 13· ·Q.· Okay. 14· ·A.· People don't want to just talk anymore.· They want 15· · · ·to protect themselves with what they say, guarded 16· · · ·in what they say. 17· ·Q.· How did that result in injury or damage to the 18· · · ·town? 19· ·A.· From my perspective it hurt our reputation and it 20· · · ·hurt our ability and hindered our ability to work 21· · · ·with entities that we needed to interact with every 22· · · ·single day.· We need to have good relationships, 23· · · ·and we had very good relationships prior to this. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 138 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 140.
    ·1· ·Q.· Sohow did the actions or omissions or inactions or ·2· · · ·actions or inactions of someone else or some other ·3· · · ·company, how did that harm the reputation of the ·4· · · ·town? ·5· ·A.· Well, specifically with the DRA, Chris Hawkins kept ·6· · · ·trying to communicate with Peter Roth on our ·7· · · ·behalf, and Peter kept telling him we were already ·8· · · ·handling it, and he just wouldn't take no for an ·9· · · ·answer. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· Again, that's the actions of someone else. 11· · · ·How did that harm or injure the town in any way? 12· ·A.· Because then it comes back around.· And when I need 13· · · ·to communicate with Peter Roth he's being, he 14· · · ·know's there's this weird thing going on, and he 15· · · ·just -- they all just started getting guarded. 16· · · · · · · · ·Jamie Dow wouldn't even have an open 17· · · ·discussion with us anymore, and she's our field 18· · · ·rep. 19· ·Q.· Okay.· Were there any other ways in which you 20· · · ·believe that the town was harmed or injured because 21· · · ·of DTC's actions and the work they did? 22· ·A.· Not beyond what I have already explained that I can 23· · · ·recall right now. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 139 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 141.
    ·1· ·Q.· Inconnection with the New Hampshire Municipal ·2· · · ·Association, how was the town or its reputation ·3· · · ·harmed or injured there? ·4· ·A.· So we reach out to New Hampshire Municipal Legal ·5· · · ·quite regularly, and unfortunately everyone started ·6· · · ·hearing about all of this.· And so either ·7· · · ·everybody, whenever we would communicate ·8· · · ·informally, they'd want to talk about it, but ·9· · · ·formally they would just be guarded with how they 10· · · ·responded to us. 11· ·Q.· Are there any other ways in which the town was 12· · · ·harmed or injured, given its reputation or 13· · · ·elsewise, with respect to the New Hampshire 14· · · ·Municipal Association? 15· ·A.· No. 16· ·Q.· Okay.· So earlier in your deposition you had stated 17· · · ·that you reached out to DRA regarding Articles 27 18· · · ·and 28 sometime after the deadline for the filing 19· · · ·of any articles or petitions for articles but 20· · · ·before the annual town meeting, right? 21· ·A.· Yes. 22· ·Q.· And I don't recall when that was.· Do you recall 23· · · ·what the deadline was, approximately? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 140 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 142.
    ·1· ·A.· Usuallyit's the first week of February. ·2· ·Q.· Okay.· Does that, the deadline in connection with ·3· · · ·article, Warrant Article 27, Warrant Article 28, ·4· · · ·would have been somewhere in February of 2023; ·5· · · ·correct? ·6· ·A.· For Article 27 and 28? ·7· ·Q.· Yeah? ·8· ·A.· No. ·9· ·Q.· Oh, '22? 10· ·A.· Yeah. 11· ·Q.· 2022.· And then those two articles were put on the 12· · · ·ballot for the warned annual town meeting that had 13· · · ·occurred in, you said March of 2000- -- 14· ·A.· 2022. 15· ·Q.· -- '22, and got passed by the voters; correct? 16· ·A.· Yes. 17· ·Q.· All right.· So prior to, prior to February of 2022, 18· · · ·you wouldn't have contacted or called or emailed 19· · · ·DRA; correct? 20· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 21· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Okay. 22· ·Q.· You can answer. 23· ·A.· Not about those articles. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 141 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 143.
    ·1· ·Q.· I'msorry? ·2· ·A.· Not necessarily about those articles. ·3· ·Q.· Okay. ·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· Can we go off the record ·5· · · ·for a second? ·6· ·A.· Yeah, not about those articles. ·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Back on the record. ·8· ·Q.· What about any other reason for communicating with ·9· · · ·or reaching out to DRA regarding warrant articles 10· · · ·or articles in general coming from Woodsville? 11· ·A.· Before petitions are filed? 12· ·Q.· Before the, prior to the deadline, the filing, 13· · · ·which you said was February? 14· ·A.· There could, I mean hypothetically there could have 15· · · ·been.· I'm not talking about Woodsville, I'm 16· · · ·talking about in general, individuals who might 17· · · ·come to the town asking for guidance on filing a 18· · · ·warrant article. 19· ·Q.· Okay. 20· ·A.· I don't recall if that, I don't believe that ever 21· · · ·happened with these particular types of articles. 22· ·Q.· Okay. 23· ·A.· I don't recall that. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 142 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 144.
    ·1· ·Q.· Butyou didn't have any communication, especially ·2· · · ·email communication, with DRA prior to February of ·3· · · ·2022 with respect to any kind of warrant articles ·4· · · ·coming from or being filed by Woodsville? ·5· ·A.· I wouldn't have communicated with DRA about ·6· · · ·Woodsville articles before they came into the town ·7· · · ·hall because I wouldn't know about them. ·8· · · · · · · · ·I might have communicated with DRA on ·9· · · ·other things.· I do all the time; we communicate 10· · · ·all the time. 11· ·Q.· Okay.· Is there an avenue or is there a majority 12· · · ·way of phone calls or emails?· Is it typically one 13· · · ·way or another? 14· ·A.· We try to pick up the phone and have a 15· · · ·conversation. 16· ·Q.· Okay. 17· ·A.· But of course there are emails. 18· ·Q.· Okay.· Is that something with respect to phone 19· · · ·calls to DRA prior to DTC getting involved, are 20· · · ·those phone calls what you were referring to as 21· · · ·sort of the reputational damage or injury to the 22· · · ·town in interacting with DRA, those phone calls, 23· · · ·those changed? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 143 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 145.
    ·1· ·A.· Ourcommunications definitely changed, yes. ·2· ·Q.· Okay. ·3· ·A.· And I think along those lines, if I could just ·4· · · ·elaborate, the response that I eventually saw that ·5· · · ·Peter Roth sent was scathing and in my opinion ·6· · · ·caused an awful lot of harm.· It clearly, his ·7· · · ·opinion of the town was very different after those ·8· · · ·interactions with DTC. ·9· ·Q.· What response are you referring to?· What response 10· · · ·do you have in mind? 11· ·A.· He sent a letter back to DTC -- 12· ·Q.· Okay. 13· ·A.· -- admonishing them for the tone of their letter 14· · · ·and the way that they had handled things. 15· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you know, do you know why DTC's letter 16· · · ·was written in the tone or the way that it was that 17· · · ·DTC sent to DRA? 18· ·A.· Why it was written that way? 19· ·Q.· Yes. 20· ·A.· I don't know why they would write something like 21· · · ·that. 22· ·Q.· Okay. 23· ·A.· We had already gotten guidance from Christine to BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 144 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 146.
    ·1· · ··write a nicely worded letter, and that she had ·2· · · ·already talked to Peter Roth and he would set the ·3· · · ·tax rate. ·4· · · · · · · · ·So the letter in that tone was ·5· · · ·unnecessary at that point that DTC ended up ·6· · · ·sending. ·7· · · · · · · · ·They didn't need to send it at all, but ·8· · · ·the tone was unnecessary at that point. ·9· ·Q.· How long was the, I will characterize it as delay, 10· · · ·because DRA finally did set the tax rate as we now 11· · · ·know, from the time that DRA provided some kind of 12· · · ·notice that they weren't going to set the tax rate 13· · · ·to the time that they actually finally did, do you 14· · · ·recall what the time frame of that was? 15· ·A.· Well, they sent us the letter the end of December. 16· · · ·We knew already that they weren't going to set it 17· · · ·until after the 9th of January anyway.· And by the, 18· · · ·like, the next week, after that procedural defect 19· · · ·meeting, we had gotten notice they were setting the 20· · · ·tax rate. 21· · · · · · · · ·So legitimately the delay was like a 22· · · ·week. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· What was the, during that same time, the end BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 145 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 147.
    ·1· · ··of 2022, beginning of 2023, what was the board's ·2· · · ·assessment as far as what kind of a delay was ·3· · · ·likely regarding this, the DRA's position on this ·4· · · ·tax rate setting issue? ·5· ·A.· They were aware of that timeline with regards to ·6· · · ·the procedural defect meeting. ·7· ·Q.· And the procedural defect was the grant money or ·8· · · ·something -- ·9· ·A.· The school. 10· ·Q.· -- the school had received.· The reason why you 11· · · ·said January 9th it was going to be corrected is 12· · · ·because that was the next meeting that the school 13· · · ·board was going to have? 14· ·A.· I don't know why they said the 9th.· The 9th I 15· · · ·think was a Thursday, if I remember correctly. 16· ·Q.· Okay. 17· ·A.· I don't know why they picked that date.· They don't 18· · · ·usually meet on a Thursday, so I don't know why 19· · · ·they picked that date. 20· ·Q.· Because.· Okay.· So if you guys could take a look 21· · · ·at that. 22· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 6, 1/27/22 Email, marked for 23· · · ·identification.) BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 146 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 148.
    ·1· ·Q.· Okay.·So you've got a one-page document in front ·2· · · ·of you that is a January, an email, January 27th, ·3· · · ·2022? ·4· ·A.· Yup. ·5· ·Q.· Okay.· And this is an email from you to James ·6· · · ·Gerry, G-E-R-R-Y? ·7· ·A.· Gerry, yup. ·8· ·Q.· Gerry.· And then a Jamie Dow, D-O-W.· Who are those ·9· · · ·two individuals? 10· ·A.· Jamie Dow is our field rep.· And James Gerry at the 11· · · ·time was the director. 12· ·Q.· Director of? 13· ·A.· The Municipal, I don't remember his title, but at 14· · · ·DRA. 15· ·Q.· Okay.· At DRA. 16· ·A.· They are both DRA. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· Gotcha.· So on January 27, 2022, why did you 18· · · ·send this email to, I'll just lump them in together 19· · · ·as DRA? 20· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection. 21· ·Q.· Go ahead. 22· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· This is outside of the scope 23· · · ·of summary judgment and the case in general. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 147 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 149.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· No, it's not. ·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· I mean, the Court's April 4th ·3· · · ·order limited the deposition to summary judgment ·4· · · ·and, you know, what happened when two petitioned ·5· · · ·warrant articles were filed.· Outside the scope. ·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· The position is from town ·7· · · ·manager is that the DRA just came about with this, ·8· · · ·and that's where this is going. ·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Okay. 10· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· And, again, the credibility, 11· · · ·as you will see. 12· ·BY MR. SOUCY: 13· ·Q.· So -- 14· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· Well, what does credibility 15· · · ·have to do with summary judgment?· The rules for 16· · · ·summary judgment tell us what the -- 17· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· The affidavit. 18· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· The nonmoving, the 19· · · ·non-departed closing summary judgment does state 20· · · ·all the inferences in their favor. 21· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Yup. 22· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· So there's no credibility 23· · · ·determination to be made there. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 148 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 150.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· If it can be shown as to what ·2· · · ·the facts are in the affidavit are not credible, ·3· · · ·then it goes more than just an inference; it ·4· · · ·actually goes to the substance of the contents of ·5· · · ·the. ·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· So your position is you're ·7· · · ·going to conduct an examination to show that the ·8· · · ·witness is not, is it general credibility or a ·9· · · ·specific instance, I mean -- 10· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Both. 11· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· General credibility's got 12· · · ·nothing to do with summary judgment.· The rule of 13· · · ·decision govern that.· It's, a nonmoving party gets 14· · · ·the benefit of all contested issues. 15· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Okay. 16· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· If you want to have, prove 17· · · ·factual things, I mean, you could put them in, you 18· · · ·could create factual issues, I suppose, by having 19· · · ·contradictory evidence but it doesn't have anything 20· · · ·to do with summary judgment if you're trying to say 21· · · ·she's a liar. 22· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Okay. 23· ·BY MR. SOUCY: BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 149 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 151.
    ·1· ·Q.· SoJanuary 27th, 2022, why did you send this email ·2· · · ·to DRA?· Again, we will lump both Mr. Gerry and Dow ·3· · · ·into just DRA. ·4· ·A.· So this would have gone to them for prereview. ·5· ·Q.· For prereview? ·6· ·A.· Uh-huh.· Yes. ·7· ·Q.· So earlier in your deposition today you stated that ·8· · · ·either town, Haverhill, the town manager or the ·9· · · ·assistant town manager once they get a warrant 10· · · ·article from the town clerk, because that's who 11· · · ·receives them on behalf of the town, that text or 12· · · ·the language of the petition is entered into some 13· · · ·kind of computer system that the DRA has; correct? 14· ·A.· That is true too, yes. 15· ·Q.· That is, okay.· That is true that that happens or 16· · · ·is there another way that the information is 17· · · ·initially transmitted to DRA? 18· ·A.· We formally put it into the portal and send it for 19· · · ·a formal prereview.· And, in addition, we at times 20· · · ·will send articles like these to the DRA for 21· · · ·prereview. 22· ·Q.· Okay.· So it could happen either way? 23· ·A.· It has to happen through the portal and it could BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 150 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 152.
    ·1· · ··also happen that we are sending the petitions for ·2· · · ·prereview. ·3· ·Q.· So was this email one of the additional ways of ·4· · · ·submitting article, both of them, Articles 27 and ·5· · · ·28 for that prereview process? ·6· ·A.· Yup.· And we would do that with others as well, ·7· · · ·depending what the questions were of DRA. ·8· ·Q.· So what was it about Article 27 that caused you, ·9· · · ·not Ms. Boucher, but caused you to submit this 10· · · ·email to DRA for this prereview process? 11· ·A.· Article 27 specifically or both? 12· ·Q.· Yes. 13· ·A.· I don't remember which was which. 14· ·Q.· Okay. 15· ·A.· I'd have to go back and look at which one was fire 16· · · ·and which -- I mean it doesn't really matter, I 17· · · ·guess. 18· ·Q.· Okay.· So if you don't remember which was which, 19· · · ·let's lump them together.· So what about Articles 20· · · ·27 and 28 caused you to send this email as part of 21· · · ·the prereview process that DRA does? 22· ·A.· Well, anything financially related it has to go 23· · · ·through DRA.· And we work with DRA closely on BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 151 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 153.
    ·1· · ··anything that's tax related, I mean financially ·2· · · ·related. ·3· · · · · · · · ·And so these were going to end up in the ·4· · · ·portal and we needed to know not only from legal ·5· · · ·but from the DRA if these should even be addressed. ·6· · · ·Like how should we deal with these?· These were an ·7· · · ·anomaly.· We had never seen anything like this ·8· · · ·before. ·9· ·Q.· Okay.· And who made the decision to do this 10· · · ·alternate or additional step, not fully 11· · · ·understanding sort of what it is, but who made the 12· · · ·decision to send this email in addition to just 13· · · ·entering in the text of the warrant articles? 14· ·A.· In the case of anomalies like this it would have 15· · · ·been me or Jennifer, and we had done that in the 16· · · ·past. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you recall with respect to Article, 18· · · ·Warrant Article 27, who made the decision? 19· ·A.· Well, I sent this email so -- 20· ·Q.· Correct. 21· ·A.· -- I assume both articles were attached, I would 22· · · ·assume, but maybe not because I can't tell. 23· ·Q.· Right.· Do you recall who made the decision at BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 152 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 154.
    ·1· · ··sending this particular email to DRA as part of the ·2· · · ·prereview process back on January 27th? ·3· ·A.· I'm sure it would have been a conversation between ·4· · · ·Jennifer and I to get DRA's input on this. ·5· ·Q.· Okay.· Is it fair to say you don't recall if it was ·6· · · ·you or if it was Jennifer? ·7· ·A.· I don't recall the exact conversations we had, no. ·8· ·Q.· Okay.· And you also don't recall whose decision it ·9· · · ·was to send the email? 10· ·A.· Ultimately I guess it would have been my decision 11· · · ·because I sent the email. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· I don't want to presume, that's why I'm 13· · · ·asking if you have an actual memory of -- 14· ·A.· No -- 15· ·Q.· -- whose decision it was? 16· ·A.· No, I don't. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· This is a January 31 email. 18· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 7, 1/31/22 Email, marked for 19· · · ·identification.) 20· ·Q.· Just let me know.· We've marked it with an exhibit 21· · · ·sticker and just let me know when you've had a 22· · · ·chance to look at it. 23· ·A.· Okay. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 153 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 155.
    ·1· ·Q.· Okay. ·2·· · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· For the record I will just ·3· · · ·indicate that the second page of this, which in the ·4· · · ·top right corner is a handwritten notation of "35 ·5· · · ·registered voters".· There were multiple copies of ·6· · · ·this effectively signature sheet or signature page ·7· · · ·with all of the same typed caption or heading at ·8· · · ·the top.· I just didn't feel the need to replicate ·9· · · ·page after page after page just adding to the 10· · · ·volume but not the substance of this particular 11· · · ·attachment. 12· ·BY MR. SOUCY: 13· ·Q.· So with respect to this two-page exhibit to your 14· · · ·deposition, you've had a chance to look at this 15· · · ·document; correct? 16· ·A.· Yes. 17· ·Q.· And it is an email from you dated January 31st of 18· · · ·2022, again, to the same two individuals at DRA; 19· · · ·correct? 20· ·A.· Exactly. 21· ·Q.· Just so I can cover it, do you have a specific 22· · · ·memory of actually sending this email? 23· ·A.· No. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 154 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 156.
    ·1· ·Q.· Andin the subject line it says, Two new warrant ·2· · · ·articles needing review.· Did you send this email ·3· · · ·to DRA as part of that DRA prereview process? ·4· ·A.· I would have, yes. ·5· ·Q.· Okay. ·6· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 8, 2/2/22 Email, marked for ·7· · · ·identification.) ·8· ·Q.· We have got the next exhibit is, you've had a ·9· · · ·chance to look at this? 10· ·A.· Yup. 11· ·Q.· So we have got an email from yourself dated 12· · · ·February 2nd, 2022, to Mr. Gerry at DRA; correct? 13· ·A.· Yes. 14· ·Q.· Okay.· Having had a chance to look at this email, 15· · · ·do you recall drafting and sending this email? 16· ·A.· I do. 17· ·Q.· Okay.· Why did you send this email to the DRA? 18· ·A.· I sent this email to the DRA after talking to 19· · · ·Drummond Woodsum.· We had requested a legal opinion 20· · · ·on the articles because they were related to the 21· · · ·same funding matter that we had been litigating and 22· · · ·dealing with right along, as well as related to the 23· · · ·legislation that Senator Giuda had worked on. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 155 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 157.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · ·So I had reached out and also talked to ·2· · · ·some of the board members about some of the ·3· · · ·information we had gotten, and between Bob Giuda ·4· · · ·and Drummond Woodsum there was a sense, there was a ·5· · · ·general understanding that these were likely ·6· · · ·illegal. ·7· ·Q.· And who were the board members that you spoke to ·8· · · ·prior to sending this email? ·9· ·A.· Matt Bjelobrk, Fred Garofalo.· And we brought, we 10· · · ·did discuss the legal opinion at select board 11· · · ·meetings; and Fred Garofalo read that legal opinion 12· · · ·at the annual town meeting that year. 13· ·Q.· Prior to sending this email, I don't want to say 14· · · ·only, but you spoke with Matt and Fred? 15· ·A.· I remember speaking with both of them.· I might 16· · · ·have spoken with Howard.· And I don't recall the 17· · · ·date of meetings, so I would have to go back and 18· · · ·look at the records to see exactly how it all 19· · · ·played out. 20· ·Q.· Okay.· That was going to be my next -- where did 21· · · ·you speak with Matt and Fred, meaning during a 22· · · ·public meeting or outside of a public meeting? 23· ·A.· They would all visit my office -- BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 156 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 158.
    ·1· ·Q.· Okay. ·2··A.· -- individually to have conversations about a ·3· · · ·variety of things. ·4· ·Q.· Okay.· And that's where they, you recall having a ·5· · · ·conversation or where it could have or where it ·6· · · ·likely is?· I just want to make sure -- ·7· ·A.· That's really the only place I would have ·8· · · ·conversations with them would be my office other ·9· · · ·than a board meeting, which would be on the record. 10· ·Q.· Do you have a specific memory or recollection of 11· · · ·where you had the discussion with each of them 12· · · ·before sending this out? 13· ·A.· Not specifically. 14· ·Q.· Okay.· So in looking at this email in sum or in 15· · · ·total, you are asking at the bottom of the first 16· · · ·page, We formally ask that you disallow both the 17· · · ·attached warrant articles, and then the next line 18· · · ·down, By disallowing these articles, department of 19· · · ·revenue will admonish any similar future attempts 20· · · ·by districts throughout New Hampshire.· Do you see 21· · · ·those two lines? 22· ·A.· I do. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· So when you stated on that second-to-last BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 157 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 159.
    ·1· · ··sentence on the first page, bottom of the first ·2· · · ·page, We formally ask, who is the, quote/unquote, ·3· · · ·we on that line? ·4· ·A.· Collectively the town. ·5· ·Q.· And how is it that you as the town manager were ·6· · · ·speaking or expressing the request on behalf of the ·7· · · ·entire town? ·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection. ·9· ·Q.· You can answer. 10· ·A.· As town manager it was my responsibility to not 11· · · ·only communicate with the DRA but also regarding 12· · · ·anything to do with legal, and so I was working 13· · · ·with Drummond Woodsum on the legal aspects of this. 14· · · ·I was working with the DRA as well, and working 15· · · ·with my counterpart in my office, which was 16· · · ·Jennifer Boucher, and then keeping the board 17· · · ·appraised, which was my responsibility to keep them 18· · · ·appraised of things that were significant. 19· ·Q.· So do you recall when or which public meeting 20· · · ·during which you spoke to the board and/or got 21· · · ·instruction from the board of selectmen to send 22· · · ·this email or something like it? 23· ·A.· I didn't need the board's approval to send this BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 158 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 160.
    ·1· · ··email.· They didn't, they don't micromanage the ·2· · · ·town manager in that way. ·3· · · · · · · · ·And I don't recall the actual meeting ·4· · · ·where we talked about the legal opinion.· I would ·5· · · ·have to go back and look at the minutes. ·6· ·Q.· Okay.· Is it your recollection that whichever ·7· · · ·meeting, public meeting that it was that Fred read ·8· · · ·Drummond Woodsum's written opinion or assessment, ·9· · · ·it would have been that same meeting that the board 10· · · ·expressed either their request or their desire for 11· · · ·this email to be sent out or to ask the DRA? 12· ·A.· This email was not something that the board 13· · · ·directed.· So, sending an email like this to the 14· · · ·DRA is not something the board would have directed 15· · · ·me to do. 16· ·Q.· Okay.· And you otherwise just stated that you 17· · · ·didn't actually need their permission or approval? 18· ·A.· To send an email to the DRA. 19· ·Q.· Okay.· But specifically this email that is asking, 20· · · ·We formally ask you to disallow, you didn't even 21· · · ·need that authority from the board? 22· ·A.· I don't believe I did, no. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· The very last line, which I already read, BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 159 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 161.
    ·1· · ··speaks to or asks or in asking DRA to disallow ·2· · · ·these articles will admonish other districts ·3· · · ·throughout New Hampshire.· Is that something that's ·4· · · ·within your role and your responsibilities for the ·5· · · ·Town of Haverhill? ·6· ·A.· I was reiterating what Bob Giuda had already made ·7· · · ·clear with regards to his intent with the ·8· · · ·legislation related to Woodsville, statements that ·9· · · ·had been made related to the precariousness of 10· · · ·allowing a district to do so. 11· ·Q.· Okay.· How was that within your role in the scope 12· · · ·of the town manager's position with respect to 13· · · ·pointing out that DRA could admonish other 14· · · ·districts? 15· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection. 16· ·Q.· You can answer. 17· ·A.· I guess I don't understand what you're asking. 18· ·Q.· Okay.· Well, by this and through this email you're 19· · · ·not only asking DRA to disallow both of the warrant 20· · · ·articles, but also pointing out to DRA that doing 21· · · ·so will send the message to other districts in 22· · · ·other towns, not just, you know, the three other 23· · · ·districts, you know, Woodsville, but the other BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 160 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 162.
    ·1· · ··three, not just the other districts in the confines ·2· · · ·of Haverhill, but all of the other misbehaving ·3· · · ·districts in other towns in all of New Hampshire. ·4· · · ·How is that within the role of the town manager for ·5· · · ·the Town of Haverhill? ·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·7· ·Q.· You can answer. ·8· ·A.· From my perspective I was just making a statement ·9· · · ·of fact that by doing so it would set that stage. 10· · · ·It would set a precedent for what was a proper 11· · · ·thing to do and not a proper thing to do. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· On the next page, the second-to-last 13· · · ·paragraph, you wrote, Please, we ask you to help 14· · · ·the people of New Hampshire to clearly understand 15· · · ·the laws of the State of New Hampshire by 16· · · ·disallowing these articles. 17· · · · · · · · ·Again, how did you believe that it was 18· · · ·within your scope as town manager for the Town of 19· · · ·Haverhill? 20· ·A.· Well, I definitely believe I had a duty as a town 21· · · ·manager in relation to my peers as other town 22· · · ·managers, and we often talk about how the laws are 23· · · ·applied in our different municipalities.· So that BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 161 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 163.
    ·1· · ··was a general statement as well that to help us ·2· · · ·all, let's make the playing field clear. ·3· ·Q.· After that February 2nd email to the DRA, do you ·4· · · ·recall or remember how many more emails you sent to ·5· · · ·DRA regarding this tax rate setting issue? ·6· ·A.· After this I think most of my emails were fact ·7· · · ·responses, like sending information that was ·8· · · ·requested of us, but I don't recall exactly; I ·9· · · ·would have to go back and look at the records. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· And some of those dealt with DRA's or Peter 11· · · ·Roth's questions about the backdrop, right, the 12· · · ·history of where all of the districts -- 13· ·A.· Hundred-and-something years. 14· ·Q.· Going back to the buggy whip days, right? 15· ·A.· Yeah. 16· ·Q.· Other than that or in addition to that, do you know 17· · · ·how many other, do you recall how many other emails 18· · · ·you sent to the DRA? 19· ·A.· I don't recall. 20· ·Q.· Okay.· Do you recall sending additional emails? 21· ·A.· I recall a lot of emails trying to get Peter the 22· · · ·information he was looking for; that's what I 23· · · ·remember. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 162 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 164.
    ·1· ·Q.· Howabout outside or beyond providing historical ·2· · · ·documents and background to Woodsville and the ·3· · · ·other districts, do you recall? ·4· ·A.· I don't recall. ·5· ·Q.· If there are at least five additional emails that ·6· · · ·you sent to DRA regarding the two warrant articles ·7· · · ·that are in addition to the information that DRA ·8· · · ·asked for in connection with its pre-approval or ·9· · · ·prereview process, does that sound about right? 10· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 11· ·Q.· You can answer. 12· ·A.· I honestly don't remember. 13· ·Q.· Okay.· You do recall sending other ones that didn't 14· · · ·relate to the historical background, though? 15· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection. 16· ·Q.· You can answer. 17· ·A.· I don't remember that.· I don't remember. 18· ·Q.· Do you recall any of the members of the board or 19· · · ·the board of selectmen itself asking you regarding 20· · · ·communications that you had with DRA? 21· ·A.· I just remember one, and that was Kevin Knapp. 22· ·Q.· And what did he ask? 23· ·A.· I don't remember exactly what he asked.· It was an BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 163 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 165.
    ·1· · ··incredibly busy day and he asked for an enormous ·2· · · ·amount of information and he wanted it by the end ·3· · · ·of the day, which was absolutely impossible. ·4· ·Q.· Okay.· And what was your response to that email ·5· · · ·request? ·6· ·A.· I told him something along the lines of most of our ·7· · · ·communications are on the phone, something like ·8· · · ·that. ·9· ·Q.· Okay.· And did you say that it was an incredibly 10· · · ·busy day and you'd get back to him the next day or 11· · · ·later that week or anything? 12· ·A.· No, that particular interaction was one of 13· · · ·literally hundreds I was getting from him and Katie 14· · · ·that were overwhelming our office with requests 15· · · ·that were really outside the scope of us just doing 16· · · ·our day-to-day business.· So it was one of many. I 17· · · ·literally had hundreds of emails from Katie.· I was 18· · · ·just overwhelmed at the time. 19· ·Q.· So how is it that you then don't respond to members 20· · · ·of a board of selectmen requesting information 21· · · ·about something that's so vitally important to the 22· · · ·town? 23· ·A.· From my perspective -- BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 164 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 166.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·2· ·Q.· You can answer. ·3· ·A.· At that time I didn't see that as anything vital. ·4· · · ·It absolutely was not, it did not rise to that ·5· · · ·level for me at all. ·6· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 9, 1/6/23 Email, marked for ·7· · · ·identification.) ·8· ·Q.· So I just gave you a, my apologies, but a ·9· · · ·photograph of -- let me back up, a printout of a 10· · · ·photograph of an email.· I don't know how many more 11· · · ·times we can insert different types of technology 12· · · ·in there and still have something tangible in our 13· · · ·hands. 14· · · · · · · · ·But we have an email, a representation, a 15· · · ·printout of an email from May 5th of 2022, and a 16· · · ·core email is from you to Kevin Knapp.· Do you, 17· · · ·just let me know when you guys have had a chance to 18· · · ·review that. 19· ·A.· I'm good. 20· ·Q.· Okay.· So down toward the bottom Kevin Knapp sends 21· · · ·an email to you and CC'd Katie Williams.· Katie 22· · · ·Williams at that time was a member of the board of 23· · · ·selectmen; correct? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 165 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 167.
    ·1· ·A.· Yes. ·2··Q.· Okay.· So May 5th, 2022, at 10:29 a.m. Kevin Knapp, ·3· · · ·a board member, sends you, then town manager, an ·4· · · ·email saying Good morning, Brigitte.· Can you ·5· · · ·forward me all emails sent and received from the ·6· · · ·DRA.· Anything that has to do with the Warrant ·7· · · ·Articles 27 and 28.· I would like them by the end ·8· · · ·of the business day.· I would like to be able to ·9· · · ·answer any questions that may arise in this case. 10· · · · · · · · ·Does it look like I read that correctly? 11· ·A.· You did. 12· ·Q.· Okay.· Again, wish for a better copy but this is 13· · · ·what we have.· So you, it appears from what you 14· · · ·already explained, recall this email? 15· ·A.· I do. 16· ·Q.· Okay.· And then roughly half an hour later on the 17· · · ·same day, May 5th, 2022, you respond or reply to 18· · · ·Kevin and CC the assistant town manager, Hello, 19· · · ·Kevin.· The DRA rarely puts anything in email. 20· · · ·They call us or we call them except for formal 21· · · ·notifications (such as attached). 22· · · · · · · · ·With respect to the emails that we have 23· · · ·gone over and the additional emails that you sent BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 166 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 168.
    ·1· · ··to the DRA regarding these two articles, Warrant ·2· · · ·Articles 27 and 28, what would you say about the ·3· · · ·accuracy of your statement there or your sentence ·4· · · ·there about the DRA rarely puts anything in email? ·5· ·A.· They don't.· Compared to the number of phone calls ·6· · · ·we have with them. ·7· ·Q.· So it's a relative to phone calls explanation. ·8· ·A.· Yeah.· I mean, yes, or in general. ·9· ·Q.· Okay.· And Kevin's email down below that we already 10· · · ·read didn't ask just for emails from DRA, but he 11· · · ·asked to forward me all the emails sent and 12· · · ·received, so it's a to and from. 13· · · · · · · · ·You sent him back that response, but you 14· · · ·never indicated that there were all of these emails 15· · · ·that had been sent from the Town to the DRA, right? 16· ·A.· I told him specifically that he should go and reach 17· · · ·out -- and it wasn't even him.· So the way this 18· · · ·worded made it sound like he was probably looking 19· · · ·for information for someone else, which happened a 20· · · ·lot at that time. 21· · · · · · · · ·And from my perspective, I was, I didn't 22· · · ·have the time to do that, and that he should ask, 23· · · ·tell that individual to go and ask the DRA. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 167 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 169.
    ·1· ·Q.· Okay.·Can you kind of unpack that for us?· So when ·2· · · ·you got the email back in early May of 2022, what ·3· · · ·in addition to what's actually written here did you ·4· · · ·see or understand that somehow Kevin's email might ·5· · · ·have been the product of somebody over his shoulder ·6· · · ·or something? ·7· ·A.· So this is out of context to what was happening at ·8· · · ·that time. ·9· ·Q.· Yeah, could you explain what was going on that you 10· · · ·understood it that way? 11· ·A.· Katie and Kevin had become notorious for taking 12· · · ·requests from residents and then wanting me to feed 13· · · ·them information so then they could go back and 14· · · ·respond.· And I had systematically tried to direct 15· · · ·them that if someone has a question for town 16· · · ·administration, just send them to town 17· · · ·administration.· If they have a question of the 18· · · ·DRA, send them to the DRA.· Like we can't play this 19· · · ·round robin; nobody has time for that. 20· · · · · · · · ·And so this from my perspective was just 21· · · ·another one of those where he was trying to get 22· · · ·information for somebody else, and that's why I 23· · · ·directed him to the DRA.· That specifically anyone BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 168 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 170.
    ·1· · ··looking for information should call the DRA. ·2· · · · · · · · ·And in the middle of all this, this is us ·3· · · ·prepping for town meeting.· I was in the middle of ·4· · · ·advisory budget committee meetings, which happened ·5· · · ·rapid-fire during this time frame, and preparing ·6· · · ·for those.· We usually have 14, 15 advisory budget ·7· · · ·committee meetings in January, getting ready for ·8· · · ·town meeting, getting ready for the budget, ·9· · · ·workshop budget hearing, all of that happened end 10· · · ·of December to the first week of February.· It's a 11· · · ·very busy business time and so I was incredibly 12· · · ·busy.· And for a general question or request for 13· · · ·everything.· Go back and look for every email 14· · · ·you've ever sent to the DRA, you know.· I was like 15· · · ·I don't have time for this.· And so I was trying to 16· · · ·direct him to go get the information or if it was 17· · · ·for somebody else, tell them to go get the 18· · · ·information somewhere else. 19· ·Q.· Had, going back to that time frame, had Kevin Knapp 20· · · ·sent you other or different requests prior to this 21· · · ·one for other types of information? 22· ·A.· Both him and Katie were doing that a lot -- 23· ·Q.· Okay.· What -- BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 169 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 171.
    ·1· ·A.· --for all sorts -- ·2· ·Q.· What did Kevin previously ask you for that you ·3· · · ·understood was him gathering documents or ·4· · · ·information for other residents? ·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection. ·6· ·Q.· Go ahead. ·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Outside the scope of summary ·8· · · ·judgment. ·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Looking for the context of 10· · · ·this -- 11· ·A.· It could be just about anything -- 12· ·Q.· Okay. 13· ·A.· -- from what did the highway crew do yesterday to 14· · · ·what did we purchase for gloves last week.· You 15· · · ·know, it just was a little bit of everything. 16· ·Q.· Okay.· And were those two things actual requests 17· · · ·that Kevin had made, though? 18· ·A.· Those are two things he had, but there were 19· · · ·numerous others. 20· ·Q.· Okay.· And no time after your email reply on May 21· · · ·5th of 2022 did you follow back up with him and ask 22· · · ·whether it was for him or a resident, or didn't 23· · · ·forward him on to a copy of any of the other BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 170 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 172.
    ·1· · ··emails, right? ·2· ·A.· No.· And actually when this showed up in the packet ·3· · · ·of information we got back from DTC a year later, I ·4· · · ·was surprised this was even in here because this ·5· · · ·was so insignificant to me. ·6· ·Q.· Okay. ·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Can we take a break? ·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Yeah. ·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Can we go off the record. 10· · · · · · · · ·(Recess taken.) 11· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· Back on the record. 12· ·BY MR. SOUCY: 13· ·Q.· Okay, Ms. Codling.· We took a brief break.· We are 14· · · ·back on the record.· You are still under oath.· At 15· · · ·paragraph 35 of your affidavit, and it's attached 16· · · ·to the Town's Motion for Summary Judgment, you 17· · · ·stated that on March 14, 2023, Steve Robbins was 18· · · ·voted out of office.· Is that an accurate 19· · · ·statement? 20· ·A.· If that was the town meeting vote, then yes. 21· ·Q.· Okay.· Was he voted out of office or more accurate 22· · · ·to say he wasn't reelected 2023? 23· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 171 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 173.
    ·1· ·Q.· Okay.·Go ahead. ·2· ·A.· He didn't win his seat. ·3· ·Q.· He ran for reelection and didn't win? ·4· ·A.· Yes.· Yes. ·5· ·Q.· What, how have you been injured or damaged with ·6· · · ·respect to DTC's actions as far as anxiety or ·7· · · ·anything that you allege you've been caused to go ·8· · · ·through or -- ·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· Objection.· This has 10· · · ·nothing to do with summary judgment. 11· · · · · · · · ·Don't answer. 12· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· All right. 13· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 10, Text Messages, marked for 14· · · ·identification.) 15· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· I just wanted to add to my 16· · · ·objection.· Not only does it not have anything to 17· · · ·do with the summary judgment, it has nothing to do 18· · · ·with the contract action at all either. 19· ·BY MR. SOUCY: 20· ·Q.· Okay.· I have given you and your attorney three 21· · · ·pages, color photocopies.· You can take a look at 22· · · ·those and just let me know when you've had a chance 23· · · ·to look at them. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 172 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 174.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · ·(Pause.) ·2· ·A.· Good. ·3· ·Q.· All set? ·4· ·A.· Yeah. ·5· ·Q.· So you've had a chance to take a look at these ·6· · · ·three pages?· Can you identify or explain what ·7· · · ·these are? ·8· ·A.· They look like text messages between me and Mike ·9· · · ·Graham. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· Sorry to split hairs, but they look like it 11· · · ·or they are? 12· ·A.· Yeah.· I don't remember them, but yes. 13· ·Q.· Okay.· You don't recall providing these in 14· · · ·connection with responses to requests for 15· · · ·documents? 16· ·A.· I don't think I provided these. 17· ·Q.· Do you have a work phone that the town provides or 18· · · ·a personal phone that you use for work? 19· ·A.· I have a work phone. 20· ·Q.· Okay.· So you don't recall providing copies of 21· · · ·screenshots to text messages or anything else? 22· ·A.· I don't remember these at all. 23· ·Q.· Okay.· And do you recall back in, the dates are in BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 173 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 175.
    ·1· · ··the center of these pages, January 9th and then ·2· · · ·January 10th at the bottom of the third page, text ·3· · · ·messages between you and Mike Graham regarding the ·4· · · ·topics that are in here about emergency meeting ·5· · · ·5:00 p.m. on the 9th? ·6· ·A.· I know we had one.· I don't remember this at all. ·7· ·Q.· You don't remember the text message exchange? ·8· ·A.· No. ·9· ·Q.· Okay.· All right. 10· · · · · · · · ·(Exhibit 11, Text Messages Continued, 11· · · ·marked for identification.) 12· ·A.· I'm good. 13· ·Q.· All set?· So you've taken a look at those six 14· · · ·pages?· As I stated earlier, the first three pages 15· · · ·of the newest, latest packet you've got the first 16· · · ·three pages are black-and-white copies or printouts 17· · · ·of the three pages from Exhibit 10.· The first 18· · · ·three pages of Exhibit 10 are the first three pages 19· · · ·of Exhibit 11.· I'd just like to you match them up 20· · · ·on your own -- 21· ·A.· Okay. 22· ·Q.· -- just to verify.· All right.· So then the fourth 23· · · ·page is text messages that you sent and received BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 174 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 176.
    ·1· · ··and not on January 9th or 10th, now we are up to ·2· · · ·January 14th.· And you state that your stress ·3· · · ·levels are through the roof regarding this.· I want ·4· · · ·to resolve this tax rate issue.· Do you see that ·5· · · ·right at the top of the fourth page? ·6· ·A.· I do.· This is an email, this is a text chain not ·7· · · ·with Mike Graham, though. ·8· ·Q.· Not with Mike Graham? ·9· ·A.· No. 10· ·Q.· And who was it, so the text messages that appear on 11· · · ·the second set of three pages, the last page 4, 5 12· · · ·and 6 of this Exhibit 11, you've looked at them. 13· · · ·Do you recall with whom you were texting? 14· ·A.· Steve Robbins. 15· ·Q.· Okay.· And then the second message down, the 14th 16· · · ·still.· The tax rate will be set on Tuesday. 17· · · · · · · · ·You replied, Hope so.· All tax rates?· Do 18· · · ·you see all of that? 19· ·A.· Uh-huh. 20· ·Q.· And we go on to the second-to-last page, and that's 21· · · ·when you start indicating or talking about Drummond 22· · · ·Woodsum or Christine at Drummond Woodsum? 23· ·A.· Yup. BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 175 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 177.
    ·1· ·Q.· Andthat's where you type in this phrase, A nicely ·2· · · ·worded letter.· You had testified or explained ·3· · · ·about that the Drummond Woodsum had explained to ·4· · · ·you in your role as the town manager that a nicely ·5· · · ·worded letter to DRA would basically get them to ·6· · · ·set the tax rate, right? ·7· ·A.· Yes. ·8· ·Q.· That's the context that you're explaining? ·9· ·A.· Yes. 10· ·Q.· So the next message then is, If the SB -- select 11· · · ·board; is that right? 12· ·A.· Yes. 13· ·Q.· -- has clear conflicts -- what were you talking 14· · · ·about with respect to the conflicts at that point 15· · · ·in time, January 14th? 16· ·A.· Specifically the issues that Jennifer Boucher and I 17· · · ·had brought up to the select board about the 18· · · ·possibility of Christopher Hawkins being involved 19· · · ·in this. 20· ·Q.· Okay.· So on that date at that point in time you 21· · · ·knew that the board of selectmen or SB, select 22· · · ·board, was communicating with DTC and there was 23· · · ·some question or issue about a conflict of BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 176 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 178.
    ·1· · ··interest? ·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. ·3· ·Q.· You can answer. ·4· ·A.· We were aware that there was something going on. ·5· ·Q.· Okay.· And then the final message on that page at ·6· · · ·the bottom of that, Also if the SB voted in the ·7· · · ·nonmeeting to retain DTC for the tax rate matter, ·8· · · ·then I recommend you ratify that in a vote in a ·9· · · ·publicly warned meeting to keep us all out of 10· · · ·trouble.· Follow the procedure, basically; is that 11· · · ·accurate? 12· ·A.· I did write that. 13· ·Q.· Okay.· And what was your understanding at that time 14· · · ·as to the board of selectmen voting to retain DTC 15· · · ·and that vote occurring in a nonmeeting? 16· ·A.· What I was trying to say there was that it couldn't 17· · · ·happen in a nonmeeting.· If they wanted to do 18· · · ·something with regards to retaining an attorney, 19· · · ·they needed to do it in a publicly warned meeting. 20· ·Q.· Okay.· Did you know as of January 14th whether or 21· · · ·not the board of selectmen voted during a 22· · · ·nonmeeting to retain DTC with respect to the tax 23· · · ·setting issue? BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 177 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 179.
    ·1· ·A.· Ihad no idea. ·2· ·Q.· Okay. ·3· ·A.· What had occurred in any nonmeeting. ·4· ·Q.· You knew that there was some, there were ·5· · · ·discussions about it after that, you didn't have ·6· · · ·more detail? ·7· ·A.· I didn't have any detail. ·8· ·Q.· Okay.· And then on the last page you go on to say, ·9· · · ·Okay.· Jennifer and I didn't get the intention of 10· · · ·the motion made.· That was or is the difference in 11· · · ·understanding between you and Jennifer 12· · · ·understanding that the board just said go out and 13· · · ·contact DTC about the tax rate setting issues, but 14· · · ·the board's understanding that the motion made and 15· · · ·the vote taken was that they intended for DTC to be 16· · · ·retained; is that fair to say? 17· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Objection.· Form. 18· ·Q.· You can answer. 19· ·A.· Say that again. 20· ·Q.· Yeah.· So this first full text on the last page, 21· · · ·Okay.· Jennifer and I didn't get the intention of 22· · · ·the motion.· What does that refer to? 23· ·A.· Well, there was another, there were other texts in BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 178 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 180.
    ·1· · ··between these. ·2· ·Q.· Okay. ·3· ·A.· And so for me it was that I was trying to reiterate ·4· · · ·to Steve that having an intent to do something ·5· · · ·isn't the same thing as doing something.· And the ·6· · · ·motion that was made was very clear. ·7· ·Q.· Okay. ·8· ·A.· So having an intent, it still doesn't achieve what ·9· · · ·they were potentially looking to do. 10· ·Q.· Okay.· And so at this point in time, again 11· · · ·January 14th, what's your understanding as to the 12· · · ·board of selectmen's belief or understanding as to 13· · · ·whether or not DTC, they had actually retained DTC? 14· ·A.· Well, we had gotten that call from Cinde Warmington 15· · · ·suggesting that she had talked to our attorney, 16· · · ·which was Christopher Hawkins.· Jennifer had sent 17· · · ·an email back to Christopher, I mean Eric Maher, 18· · · ·saying that long email where she says, You have not 19· · · ·been retained.· We haven't seen an engagement 20· · · ·letter.· We haven't seen a conflict waiver.· You 21· · · ·couldn't waive your conflict anyway because it was 22· · · ·too gross. 23· · · · · · · · ·And then Eric Maher has sent a letter BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 179 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 181.
    ·1· · ··back to her saying, We were retained.· And so this ·2· · · ·is kind of where this discussion started. ·3· ·Q.· Okay.· The last two, well, last three text ·4· · · ·messages, first of which is from you, Do I need to ·5· · · ·draft the letter I mentioned in my email or is DTC ·6· · · ·taking action for us? ·7· · · · · · · · ·Steve Robbins replies, DTC.· I'm of the ·8· · · ·impression that it's done. ·9· · · · · · · · ·And you responded, Okay.· You were 10· · · ·responding "okay" to what? 11· ·A.· From my perspective in this I was trying to get 12· · · ·information out of Steve.· I wasn't conceding to 13· · · ·anything. 14· ·Q.· So, by saying, Okay, what information were you 15· · · ·trying to get out of him or from him? 16· ·A.· With regards to that okay, at that point I just 17· · · ·needed to know if I was writing a letter.· Again, 18· · · ·this is a very busy time.· I just needed to know. 19· · · ·Just tell me what you want me to do. 20· · · · · · · · ·And from, with this chain -- Steve had 21· · · ·been very pushy about insisting that I communicate 22· · · ·with DTC; and I had been very clear that I didn't 23· · · ·feel that was appropriate.· And so this was very BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 180 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
  • 182.
    ·1· · ··awkward even trying to discuss with him, Am I ·2· · · ·writing the letter, am I'm not writing a letter? ·3· · · ·What are you trying to do?· If you're going to do ·4· · · ·something, do it in a publicly warned meeting.· Do ·5· · · ·it properly.· Like it was this weird time working ·6· · · ·with him. ·7· ·Q.· And so to what did you respond, Okay? ·8· ·A.· Whether I had to write the letter or not.· I just ·9· · · ·needed to know if I was still doing what Fred told 10· · · ·me to do. 11· ·Q.· Okay. 12· · · · · · · · ·MR. SOUCY:· I believe those are all the 13· · · ·questions I have.· The note that we are going to 14· · · ·suspend the deposition of Ms. Codling pending the 15· · · ·outcome of the motion for summary judgment and 16· · · ·whether or not discovery and the lawsuit continues. 17· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEHMANN:· All right. 18· · · · · · · · ·MR. KLINE:· Okay. 19· · · · · · · · ·(Whereupon, the deposition was suspended 20· · · ·at 2:56 p.m.) 21 22 23 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 181 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 185.
    ·1· · ·· · · · · · ·E R R A T A· ·P A G E ·2 · · · · · I, BRIGITTE CODLING, have read the transcript of ·3· ·my deposition held on May 20, 2024, in the matter TOWN · · ·OF HAVERHILL V. DTC, and the same is true and correct, ·4· ·to the best of my knowledge, with the exception of the · · ·following changes noted below, if any: ·5 · · ·Page/Line· · · · · · · · · ·Change/Reason ·6 · · ·____________· · ·___________________________________ ·7 · · ·____________· · ·___________________________________ ·8 · · ·____________· · ·___________________________________ ·9 · · ·____________· · ·___________________________________ 10 · · ·____________· · ·___________________________________ 11 · · ·____________· · ·___________________________________ 12 · · ·____________· · ·___________________________________ 13 · · ·____________· · ·___________________________________ 14 · · ·____________· · ·___________________________________ 15 · · ·____________· · ·___________________________________ 16 · · ·____________· · ·___________________________________ 17 · · ·____________· · ·___________________________________ 18 · · · · · · · · ___________________________________ 19· · · · · · · · · · · BRIGITTE CODLING 20 · · · · · Sworn to and subscribed before me, 21· ·this the _____ day of ___________, 2025. 22· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·____________________________ · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Notary Public 23· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·My commission expires: BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 182 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 186.
    ·1· · ·· · · · ·C E R T I F I C A T E ·2 ·3· · · · · I, Dawn L. Griffin-Smith, a Licensed Court ·4· ·Reporter and Notary Public of the State of New ·5· ·Hampshire, do hereby certify that the foregoing is ·6· ·a true and accurate transcript of my stenographic ·7· ·notes of the deposition of· BRIGITTE CODLING, who ·8· ·was duly sworn, taken at the place and on the date ·9· ·hereinbefore set forth. 10· · · · · I further certify that I am neither 11· ·attorney or counsel for, nor related to or 12· ·employed by any of the parties to the action in 13· ·which this deposition was taken, and further that 14· ·I am not a relative or employee of any attorney or 15· ·counsel employed in this case, nor am I 16· ·financially interested in this action. 17 18 · · · · · ·_________________________________ 19· · · · · · · Dawn L. Griffin-Smith · · · · · · · · Licensed Court Reporter 20· · · ·Certificate #108 (RSA 310-A:161-181) · · · · My Commission expires:· 1/22/25 21 22 23 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 183 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 187.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com Exhibits 11282993 BR IGITTE. CODLING. EXHIBIT1 4:14 60:6 61:9 11282993 BR IGITTE. CODLING. EXHIBIT2 4:16 5:3 68:19 69:1 96:17,18 11282993 BR IGITTE. CODLING. EXHIBIT3 4:17 75:7 11282993 BR IGITTE. CODLING. EXHIBIT4 4:19 122:1,4 11282993 BR IGITTE. CODLING. EXHIBIT5 4:20 130:19 11282993 BR IGITTE. CODLING. EXHIBIT6 4:15,21 146:22 11282993 BR IGITTE. CODLING. EXHIBIT7 4:22 153:18 11282993 BR IGITTE. CODLING. EXHIBIT8 4:23 155:6 11282993 BR IGITTE. CODLING. EXHIBIT9 5:3 165:6 11282993 BR IGITTE. CODLING. EXHIBIT10 5:4 172:13 174:17,18 11282993 BR IGITTE. CODLING. EXHIBIT11 5:5 174:10,19 175:12 1 60:6 61:9 1/13/23 122:1 1/27/22 146:22 1/31/22 153:18 1/6/23 165:6 1/9/22 68:19 10 172:13 174:17,18 100 84:16 10:29 166:2 10th 75:13 174:2 175:1 11 88:2 174:10,19 175:12 11:36 88:3 11th 75:12,22 88:12 89:23 90:12 92:5,18 95:18 12th 72:19 113:8 13 122:8,14 13th 124:21 14 116:14 169:6 171:17 14th 175:2,15 176:15 177:20 179:11 15 169:6 16 81:21 17 123:3 17th 74:18 75:4 1800s 35:10 2 2 20:22 68:19 69:1 96:17,18 131:2 2/2/22 155:6 20 11:5,12, 13 2000- 76:19 141:13 2014 10:18 2019 11:1,2 12:6 69:15 2020 11:23 12:9,18 13:2 35:9,13 57:1 61:13,22 63:5 77:1 2021 90:3,6,12 101:6 2022 32:15,19 35:9,13 43:19 44:11 45:2,10 69:4 70:17 71:19 75:12,13 76:20 77:23 87:16 100:11 102:11 116:15,17 129:4 141:11, 14,17 143:3 146:1 147:3,17 150:1 154:18 155:12 165:15 166:2,17 168:2 170:21 2023 58:13,15 75:22 76:19 88:2,12 90:13 100:1 108:16 109:1,9 112:5 113:9 122:9,14 123:3 124:21 126:15 127:6 128:9 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: 1..2023 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 188.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 141:4 146:1 171:17,22 2024 10:21 22 141:9,15 23 128:11 23rd 11:1 24 10:18,19 27 48:12 77:12 78:2 79:16 80:22 84:5 87:15 101:5 109:19,20 110:5,8 111:8,12, 16,23 114:23 115:12 140:17 141:3,6 147:17 151:4,8, 11,20 152:18 166:7 167:2 27th 147:2 150:1 153:2 28 48:12 77:12 78:2 79:16 80:22 84:22 87:15 101:5 109:19,20 110:5,8 111:8,13, 16,23 114:23 115:12 140:18 141:3,6 151:5,20 166:7 167:2 2:28 75:23 2:56 181:20 2nd 155:12 162:3 3 3 58:14 75:7 87:23 3/6/20 60:6 31 121:20 153:17 31st 154:17 35 154:4 171:15 37 18:5,6 38:4 3rd 11:2 4 4 122:1,4 175:11 4th 81:14 148:2 5 5 130:19 175:11 5/15/24 75:7 54 130:17 5:00 174:5 5:34 122:15 5th 165:15 166:2,17 170:21 6 6 146:22 175:12 6th 61:12 7 7 153:18 7/12/23 130:19 8 8 155:6 8th 10:17,21 9 9 165:6 91-A 120:15 137:11 99 53:16 9th 69:4 92:16 93:21 96:14 97:3 145:17 146:11,14 174:1,5 175:1 A a.m. 88:3 166:2 ability 27:5 45:6 117:1 138:20 abnormal 106:2 absolutely 87:19 98:12 126:3 164:3 165:4 accomplishe d 93:18 96:12 accuracy 167:3 accurate 36:7 47:11 50:13 72:10 116:17 171:18,21 177:11 achieve 179:8 acquired 126:14,16 act 36:11 111:4 112:2 acting 44:7 109:10 action 47:18 49:2,3 88:18 89:21 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: 2024..action 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 189.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 119:11 120:1 126:2,18 172:18 180:6 actions 19:16 49:8 102:10 139:1,2, 10,21 172:6 actively 92:8 activities 18:14,23 19:14,21 24:6 27:7 36:14 133:14 activity 33:20,22 36:4 37:18 56:6 actual 66:1 71:15 153:13 159:3 170:16 acutely 24:18 127:7 add 43:12 60:12 172:15 added 105:15,23 106:9 adding 154:9 addition 8:15 15:14,20 42:20 59:9 66:1 89:2 98:15 150:19 152:12 162:16 163:7 168:3 additional 12:14 59:16 84:7,11 151:3 152:10 162:20 163:5 166:23 address 51:11 94:1 98:17 134:16 addressed 122:15,19 152:5 addressing 109:13 administrat ion 14:23 15:16 22:3 23:8 32:2,13, 16 36:5 56:11 82:13 97:10 99:17 127:16 168:16,17 administrat or 10:14 25:20,22 79:7 admonish 157:19 160:2,13 admonishing 144:13 advance 124:5,9, 13 advice 117:13 118:9,13 119:3,10 advisory 83:20,22 84:1 169:4,6 affect 121:3 affidavit 116:13 148:17 149:2 171:15 affirmation 8:11 AG's 122:20 Agency 11:4,13 agree 41:1 agreed 55:5 66:22 67:13 72:8 112:11,23 agreed-upon 58:16 agreement 57:18 59:5,10, 11,18 65:22 66:1,4,8 105:4 112:10,23 113:2 ahead 59:1 78:6 117:16 147:21 170:6 172:1 allegation 105:19 allegations 31:8 allege 172:7 alleged 76:16 allegedly 28:16 alleging 29:11,17, 22 30:1 allowed 9:22 allowing 160:10 alternate 152:10 amount 56:3 110:18 164:2 amounts 110:10 111:13 analysis 13:23 and/or 16:9 17:7 129:9 158:20 annual 22:20 79:23 87:11 102:23 106:19 111:10 140:20 141:12 156:12 anomalies 152:14 anomaly 152:7 answerable 18:8 answers 8:8 14:13 anticipate 7:19 8:1 24:6 anticipatin g 30:21 anxiety 172:6 anymore 138:14 139:17 anytime 63:22 apologies BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: actions..apologies 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 190.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 165:8 apparently 69:18 appeal 114:21 115:4 appeals 114:19 appears 43:19 62:6 69:7 122:18 166:13 applied 85:3,4 161:23 appraised 158:17,18 appropriati on 63:11 approval 26:2,11 68:1 158:23 159:17 approved 54:16 68:3 85:19 approves 22:22 approximate ly 140:23 April 10:17,21 11:1,2 81:14 148:2 architectur al 11:18 areas 15:23 16:2,18 17:1 21:19 63:13 argument 124:10, 13,14 arise 166:9 arrangement 39:3 article 77:12 78:2 83:11 84:5,22 85:6,13 101:5 108:14 110:5 111:12 114:23 141:3,6 142:18 150:10 151:4,8, 11 152:17,18 articles 48:12 78:14 79:15 80:1,22 81:10 82:5,8 85:3,4, 19,21 86:4 87:1,11, 15 109:19,20 110:8 111:8,12, 16,23 112:2 115:12 140:17,19 141:11,23 142:2,6, 9,10,21 143:3,6 148:5 150:20 151:4,19 152:13,21 155:2,20 157:17,18 160:2,20 161:16 163:6 166:7 167:1,2 articulate 56:20 asks 83:16 160:1 aspects 158:13 assessment 31:7,11, 15 53:3 63:10 97:7 146:2 159:8 assign 94:18 assigned 37:1 39:9,19 42:8 49:6 50:22 61:22 83:3 assignment 50:19 117:3 assist 21:22 31:5 48:10 assistant 32:17 92:3 118:1,6, 10,14,16 150:9 166:18 association 12:23 21:4 137:4 140:2,14 assume 152:21,22 assumption 56:1 assured 131:7 attached 130:15 152:21 157:17 166:21 171:15 attachment 154:11 attempted 45:13 attempting 114:21 135:12 attempts 157:19 attend 93:11,12 99:9 attendance 106:21 attended 62:8 attention 28:2 attested 116:14 attorney 7:8 9:10, 13 13:17, 21 37:21 60:20 75:14 93:9 97:5 98:22 106:7 108:23 117:5 118:21 119:14,16 122:21,22 124:22 125:21 130:22 131:4,14, 21 132:7 172:20 177:18 179:15 attorneys 9:11 14:6 32:10 38:5 64:9 69:12,14 97:3 98:19 99:7 109:2,8 123:15 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: apparently..attorneys 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 191.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 136:15 audible 8:14 authority 18:2 27:4 32:21 33:16 34:5,6,15 36:13,19 39:13,21 40:8,20 41:3,12 44:1 45:6,14, 17 46:2, 6,20,22 47:3 50:20,23 51:18 64:19 65:7,10 67:4 68:4 105:1 133:1 159:21 authorize 26:12 authorized 46:20 54:17 55:6 avenue 143:11 awarded 12:8 aware 24:17,19 29:10,17, 22 72:19 85:8 127:7 128:22 146:5 177:4 awful 144:6 awkward 181:1 B bachelor's 11:17 back 11:16 17:22 25:20,21 26:8,14 32:6,14, 19 35:9, 10 38:9 40:12 43:4 47:2 60:9 61:7,22 63:5 72:22 78:20 80:17 83:16 87:17 88:12 98:7 100:10 105:9 107:11 108:1,13, 15 109:9 112:14 115:17 116:4,6 117:21 118:7 119:6 125:12 127:14 134:7 136:2 139:12 142:7 144:11 151:15 153:2 156:17 159:5 162:9,14 164:10 165:9 167:13 168:2,13 169:13,19 170:21 171:3,11, 14 173:23 179:17 180:1 backdrop 162:11 background 163:2,14 balances 24:16 25:9 ball 65:1 ballot 111:10 141:12 barely 61:15 based 14:20 32:18 37:23 50:18 52:6 83:21 100:14 113:14 basically 45:17 71:11 74:7 176:5 177:10 basis 20:2 22:20 42:7 112:1 137:2 bearing 102:10 103:9 106:16 began 56:21 begin 9:21 beginning 73:13 89:15 93:2 108:15 146:1 begins 76:1 88:4 behalf 27:18 29:19 31:1,16, 19 32:8 52:19 53:12,20 66:3 102:22 113:23 115:5 123:18 134:1 135:7 136:9 139:7 150:11 158:6 belief 86:7 179:12 believed 45:3 70:18 73:19 111:21 112:1,3 134:15 benefit 54:11 133:17, 19,21 135:8,9, 11 149:14 bias 107:1,2 biased 103:6 bid 20:22 22:16 bidding 21:2,3 big 127:17 biggest 67:16 bill 49:18,20, 21,22 51:10 111:4 132:20 billing 26:10 bind 84:4 89:14 binders BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: audible..binders 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 192.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 128:4,5, 19 binding 83:20,22 binds 83:23 bit 45:5 101:18 132:21 170:15 biweekly 20:10 Bjelobrk 87:4 156:9 black-and- white 174:16 board 17:6,7,11 18:13 19:14,19 20:3,7,11 22:20,21 23:3 26:1,11, 15 27:4, 14,19 28:2,5 29:12,20 30:13 31:4 32:20 33:1,15, 18,20 34:7 36:3,12 37:1,8,19 38:5,7,14 39:3,8, 12,20 40:4,18 41:11 42:2,8,11 43:8,19, 22 44:6, 13,14,19 45:1,2, 10,12,15, 23 46:4, 14,19 47:2,18 49:2,3,6, 11 50:3, 22 52:1 55:12 56:1,5 61:21 62:8,15, 16,23 64:18 65:6,9 66:7,23 67:5 68:1,11, 18 69:2 72:18,23 73:2,8, 14,16 74:8,11, 20,22 75:1,5 76:5 78:13,16, 22 79:1, 3,6,14 80:13 81:2 86:8,9, 13,14,17, 18,20,22 88:8,14, 17,18,20 89:5,13, 14,17,19, 21 90:10, 19 91:2, 7,14,19 94:1,17 96:22 97:8,23 98:10,16 99:10 100:1,10, 15,22 101:6,10, 22 102:11 103:6,12 104:22 105:6 106:17,23 107:16 109:9 114:18 115:5 116:20 117:9 118:8,13 119:1,6, 8,18,20 120:3,13, 21 125:5 126:1,8, 11,18,21 127:6,10, 14 128:13, 15,17,20 129:4,7 130:1,10 131:8 132:12 134:5,14, 15 138:6 146:13 156:2,7, 10 157:9 158:16, 20,21 159:9,12, 14,21 163:18,19 164:20 165:22 166:3 176:11, 17,21,22 177:14,21 178:12 179:12 board's 90:4 96:10 146:1 158:23 178:14 boards 101:6 Bob 156:3 160:6 body 17:11 123:2 Boldt 97:19 98:23 99:8 bookkeeper 25:17,19, 21 bottom 69:11 75:20 76:10 94:13 131:2,3 157:15 158:1 165:20 174:2 177:6 Boucher 41:21 69:9 84:14 85:2 92:2 97:2 99:17 100:12 117:18 118:4,12, 19 124:21 128:2 151:9 158:16 176:16 boundaries 16:16 box 26:16 boxes 127:17,18 128:3 132:19 break 10:5 60:4 61:8 115:23 171:7,13 Briana 122:22 Brigitte 6:2 7:2 45:17 131:9 132:13 166:4 bring 21:6 28:1,5 67:7 broader 63:13 broke 116:6 brought 43:9 47:11 65:14 76:15 77:7 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: binding..brought 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 193.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 110:20 112:8 125:18 134:5,15 156:9 176:17 budget 22:22 23:3,4 25:15,16 68:2 169:4,6, 8,9 buggy 162:14 building 22:15 24:4 buildings 20:18 21:8 business 102:5 164:16 166:8 169:11 busy 164:1,10 169:11,12 180:18 Butterfield 118:21 131:5,14, 21 132:7 C C-O-D-L-I- N-G 7:2 calendar 93:5 call 125:19 166:20 169:1 179:14 called 132:10 141:18 calls 143:12, 19,20,22 167:5,7 capacity 14:12,22 30:13 34:4 103:19 caption 62:10 154:7 care 21:8 career 12:17 careful 136:18 137:5,6 carried 19:13 23:11 124:1 carry 59:17 case 37:15 65:17 66:21,22 94:18 147:23 152:14 166:9 cases 24:13 94:18 categorizat ion 72:2 category 52:11 caused 133:22 144:6 151:8,9, 20 172:7 CC'D 122:16 165:21 center 174:1 Central 16:1 certainty 101:21 certificati on 12:19 certificati ons 13:11,13 certified 13:12 chain 75:11 122:12 131:2 175:6 180:20 chair 43:6 45:15 66:5 73:2 76:7,8 79:4 87:3 125:23 chairman 66:7 76:5 chance 68:21 75:13 122:3 130:21 153:22 154:14 155:9,14 165:17 172:22 173:5 change 10:19 134:2 138:1 changed 10:19 36:21 137:8,16 138:6 143:23 144:1 Chapter 18:6 characteriz e 129:10 145:9 check 25:22,23 26:1,3 31:22 87:17,18 91:10 checked 26:16 checking 24:19 125:14 checks 24:15 25:9 27:5,6,11 32:11 Chris 30:10 51:14,20 53:19,23 74:20 97:19 99:6,7 108:16, 18,22 109:2,5,6 110:2 112:5 113:17,22 114:7 115:10 122:16,21 123:12 125:20 131:4 132:4,10 139:5 Christine 93:13 135:2 144:23 175:22 Christmas 12:3 Christopher 98:22 104:6 122:7 176:18 179:16,17 chronologic al 128:4,5 chronology 11:16 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: budget..chronology 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 194.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com Ciandella 28:17,22 Cinde 125:19 179:14 cited 97:5 clarity 132:15 clean 10:8 clear 9:4,8 70:13 97:5 109:5,6 124:17 126:20 129:14 160:7 162:2 176:13 179:6 180:22 cleared 96:7 clerk 80:2,10 82:6,9 111:9 127:22 150:10 client 81:19,23 closed 113:3,9 closely 123:17 151:23 closing 148:19 CMS 11:8 coauthored 74:19 code 25:15 coded 25:11 codes 26:6 Codling 6:2 7:2,3 60:17 116:6 171:13 181:14 collection 63:15 Collectivel y 158:4 College 11:17 color 172:21 comments 107:23 commissione rs 103:14 committee 169:4,7 common 16:3 common-name 15:23 communicate 98:9 123:13 138:10 139:6,13 140:7 143:9 158:11 180:21 communicate d 74:16,23 78:12 143:5,8 communicati ng 74:12 77:4 142:8 176:22 communicati on 143:1,2 communicati ons 56:6 79:1,10 81:1,7 82:3 85:20 86:10 102:10 123:15 131:20 132:7 133:7 136:18,22 144:1 163:20 164:7 communities 136:23 company 23:8 107:9 139:3 Compared 167:5 compile 82:14 complaint 28:14 47:13 48:21 complete 127:11 completed 24:22 completing 12:13 component 67:16 76:23 composition 130:10 comprised 94:8 computer 150:13 conceding 180:12 concerned 96:20 concluded 112:16 conditional ly 116:15 conduct 82:17 149:7 conducted 90:1 confer 63:22 conference 93:15,16, 19 conferred 12:8 39:11 confidence 98:23 confines 161:1 confirmatio n 93:20 conflict 31:22 32:5,11 33:9,11 37:21 40:21 51:15 69:17,19 70:8,16, 21,22 71:1,2,4, 8,10,11, 12,18 72:10,12, 13,14 91:9,10 96:1,7 108:17, 19,22 109:4 115:8,9 176:23 179:20,21 conflicts 13:23 37:10 41:14 44:2,15 45:7 46:16 47:4 70:13 97:6 109:6 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: Ciandella..conflicts 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 195.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 117:2 176:13,14 confusion 29:1 connected 48:12,13, 14 52:9 55:13 77:9 109:19 110:1 115:16 connectin 124:16 connection 9:20 14:6 20:15 28:15 29:7 30:4 31:1 36:14 39:22 53:18 57:23 65:15 66:12,18 71:19 73:18 75:2 77:6 101:23 102:3,9 109:11 112:6 114:1,6, 14 116:9 117:6 121:10 124:2,17, 18 125:3, 6 136:8 140:1 141:2 163:8 173:14 connections 115:11 considerati on 8:3 considered 130:3 consistent 62:21 65:4 constituted 44:19 45:11 90:10 100:2 contact 44:9 46:7 86:23 178:13 contacted 141:18 contents 149:4 contested 149:14 context 56:4 132:17 168:7 170:9 176:8 continue 37:20 96:3 134:6 continued 70:14 174:10 continues 181:16 continuing 13:6,7, 14,16 126:3 contract 11:8 21:4 27:17 37:20 117:5 118:11 172:18 contracting 21:3 22:17 contractor 23:8 contractors 20:17 27:13 contracts 18:20 20:15 35:16,22 37:10 40:20 41:13 44:1,15 45:7 46:16 47:4 117:2 contradicto ry 149:19 control 77:10 88:23 104:17 conversatio n 8:10 87:5 125:7,11 126:5 128:12 131:18 143:15 153:3 157:5 conversatio ns 7:21 78:23 79:10 80:12 128:17 129:17 131:19,20 132:6 138:12 153:7 157:2,8 convey 38:15 conveyed 90:19 conveying 34:6 coordinate 22:19 copies 154:5 173:20 174:16 copy 127:11,13 166:12 170:23 cordial 138:12 core 165:16 corner 15:12 154:4 correct 10:18 13:18 14:7 15:6 19:8 21:13 28:17 29:13,22 30:20 31:20 34:8 37:12 39:13,18, 22 40:9 43:13 47:5,9 52:11 53:4 54:3,12 57:19 58:17 59:14 65:12 67:22 68:6 69:4,9,10 70:5 76:6,20 77:8,18, 19 78:4 79:11 81:4 82:7 83:5 85:15 87:16 90:15,23 96:4 98:11 106:9 111:10, 14,18 112:17,20 113:10 114:10 115:17 122:5 134:5,8, 11 141:5, 15,19 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: confusion..correct 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 196.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 150:13 152:20 154:15,19 155:12 165:23 corrected 146:11 corrections 25:21 correctly 83:19 94:4 146:15 166:10 correlate 132:20 Councilor 133:8 counsel 60:13 119:9,22 counterpart 158:15 counting 131:1 County 94:9 couple 40:13 courses 12:15,16, 21 13:3, 5,14 coursework 12:5 court 6:3 29:6, 7 30:5 36:1 47:14 57:14,22 58:10 59:4,8 65:1 112:15 113:4,8 Court's 81:14 148:2 cover 7:10 131:1 154:21 covered 64:21 65:16 coversheet 60:19 create 109:4 149:18 credibility 81:23 148:10, 14,22 149:8 credibility 's 149:11 credible 149:2 credits 13:15,16 crew 170:13 crisis 88:7 current 49:10 50:5 130:10 custody 104:17 cut 27:11 cutting 27:5,6 D D-O-W 147:8 daily 137:2 damage 138:17 143:21 damaged 172:5 Darwin 61:17 date 10:20 36:23 37:5 65:10 113:6 146:17,19 156:17 176:20 dated 75:22 122:8 154:17 155:11 dates 173:23 day 125:15 138:22 164:1,3, 10 166:8, 17 day-to-day 18:18 19:14 36:4 164:16 days 96:9 162:14 deadline 87:7,10 140:18,23 141:2 142:12 deal 133:22 137:1 152:6 dealing 155:22 dealt 162:10 December 12:2 92:11 93:2 145:15 169:10 decide 66:21 72:23 decided 68:12 deciding 94:17 decision 27:13 67:1,18, 20 68:8, 15 89:20 97:9 100:2 129:23 149:13 152:9,12, 18,23 153:8,10, 15 decision- making 44:9 46:7 decisions 19:16 42:10 49:8 50:20 61:23 116:22 declaratory 28:14 defect 92:15,21 93:20,23 145:18 146:6,7 defendant's 81:16 definitive 43:17 degree 11:17,19, 22 12:4,8 delay 92:13 93:22 94:16,23 145:9,21 146:2 delaying 76:18 delegate 40:6,19 41:2 delegated 33:19 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: corrected..delegated 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 197.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 36:4 37:2,18 39:9,19 41:12 42:8 49:7 61:22 64:19 65:6 117:17,18 delegating 46:22 116:21 delegation 50:3 117:9 delivered 23:12 24:9,15 25:13 deliveries 24:2 delivering 96:13 department 21:10 22:11 23:14,18 24:10,13, 18 25:11 26:8,20 56:10 85:2 122:20 123:4 157:18 departments 16:4,7,9 21:5 depending 151:7 depends 82:22 deposed 6:4 deposition 7:3 61:9 116:8 122:5 140:16 148:3 150:7 154:14 181:14,19 derogatory 106:22 107:6,7, 15,22 108:6 description 26:4 desire 159:10 desk 127:22 detail 132:21 178:6,7 determinati on 148:23 determine 20:21 92:19 difference 178:10 differently 138:8,9, 10 diligence 91:11 diploma 12:12 direct 15:5 41:8 129:17 168:14 169:16 directed 159:13,14 168:23 direction 8:22 directly 21:10 23:16 24:8 48:12,13, 14 73:23 74:15 92:2 104:21 109:18,20 114:11 115:16 135:15 director 147:11,12 disagree 81:18 97:22 disallow 157:16 159:20 160:1,19 disallowanc e 86:14 disallowed 86:6 disallowing 157:18 161:16 disclosing 71:20 72:3 disclosure 71:15,20 discovered 126:11 128:14 discovery 181:16 discuss 83:17 92:23 120:17 156:10 181:1 discussed 42:4,5 95:2,7 130:12 discussing 95:22 discussion 38:11 69:12 95:11,20 125:2 139:17 157:11 180:2 discussions 78:21 79:13 81:1 86:13,15, 16,21 178:5 displeasure 101:5 dispute 64:2,8, 14,21 67:7,14 distinct 15:19 distinction s 15:15 distributio n 63:11,15, 19 district 16:16 30:12 33:17 34:16,17, 19 35:4,5 36:7 39:17 46:3,9 47:8 51:20 53:21 54:1,12, 22,23 57:12 59:13 69:22 70:4,7,9, 10,11,19 72:4,5,15 101:8 102:1,4, 5,6,15, 20,21,22 103:8,13, 20 106:12,20 112:3 113:20 114:4,9, 14,20 115:1 124:6 160:10 district's 48:17 109:22 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: delegating..district's 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 198.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com District/ village 106:12 districts 15:8,10, 14,20,21 16:2,10, 11 17:15 94:9 121:6 157:20 160:2,14, 21,23 161:1,3 162:12 163:3 docket 113:1,2 document 60:18 61:8,10 65:20 68:22 71:18 75:10,11, 21 86:8 87:23 104:1,4, 7,18 105:1,3, 10,18 106:3,5 113:3,7 121:19 122:4 130:15,22 147:1 154:15 documented 38:11 documents 29:6,8 30:4 36:1 54:23 57:22 65:19,21 66:11 68:8,15 100:14, 17,19,20, 21 101:13 102:15 103:7,18 104:5,9, 13 106:4, 8 126:15, 16,19 127:7,13 128:14,22 133:4 134:13 136:3 163:2 170:3 173:15 dollar 110:9,18 dollars 63:12 110:9,16 Donahue 28:16,21 double 120:11 doubts 133:9 Dow 139:16 147:8,10 150:2 DRA 30:5 31:1 35:23 36:15 56:11,13, 19,21 57:3,23 73:10,18 75:3 76:18 77:5 78:1,8 79:20 81:10,19, 22 82:7, 14,17 83:4,16 84:6 85:5,12, 17,20 86:10,23 88:15,21 89:4 90:21 91:4 92:4,6,9, 23 93:14 98:15 99:1 109:12 112:6 114:1,6, 9,15 121:2,10 122:14 123:4,8, 12,20 124:18 133:8 134:4,10, 17 135:1, 15 136:10,14 139:5 140:17 141:19 142:9 143:2,5, 8,19,22 144:17 145:10,11 147:14, 15,16,19 148:7 150:2,3, 13,17,20 151:7,10, 21,23 152:5 153:1 154:18 155:3,12, 17,18 158:11,14 159:11, 14,18 160:1,13, 19,20 162:3,5, 18 163:6, 7,20 166:6,19 167:1,4, 10,15,23 168:18,23 169:1,14 176:5 DRA's 83:7 146:3 153:4 162:10 draft 133:6 180:5 drafted 104:3 drafting 155:15 dragged 76:19 driver's 88:22 Drummond 32:3 69:12,18 70:9,17 71:3,19 72:16,20 92:4,5,8, 17 93:13 94:15 95:23 96:11,12, 20,21,23 97:6 121:8,16 123:9,15, 17 124:1, 4,9,12 126:3,15, 19,23 134:1 135:14, 19,20 136:15 155:19 156:4 158:13 159:8 175:21,22 176:3 DTC 28:22 29:2,10, 17 30:3, 6,15 32:7 47:11 48:9 49:20,22 51:8,23 52:18,20 53:11 54:2,8, 17,23 55:6,11 56:2 68:17 73:9,17 74:3,13, 21 75:2 97:3,5, 10,11,19, 21 98:2, 11,17,18, BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: District/village..DTC 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 199.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 19 99:7 100:3 104:6 105:3,6 108:17,21 109:1,2, 7,11,12 113:17 123:9 124:22 125:2,5 126:2 127:1,6, 11,12 128:14 129:8,11, 20 130:9 132:8,23 133:6,9, 18 134:15, 20,22 135:5,17, 20 136:3, 5,7,10 138:2,5 143:19 144:8,11, 17 145:5 171:3 176:22 177:7,14, 22 178:13,15 179:13 180:5,7, 22 DTC's 131:15,21 139:21 144:15 172:6 due 77:11,12 91:10 duly 6:3 duplicative 135:13 duty 161:20 E earlier 57:1 65:5 109:20 140:16 150:7 174:14 earliest 87:5 early 77:1 99:11,21 128:11 168:2 East 16:1 edited 74:19 education 11:15 12:13 13:3,7, 14,16 education- type 13:6 effectively 154:6 elaborate 144:4 elections 44:21 elsewise 140:13 email 74:16 75:7,21, 23 76:4 86:3 88:1,3 89:11,15 91:6 97:19 98:22 122:1,7, 11,12 123:22 124:22 125:4 130:15,19 131:4 132:10 143:2 146:22 147:2,5, 18 150:1 151:3,10, 20 152:12,19 153:1,9, 11,17,18 154:17,22 155:2,6, 11,14,15, 17,18 156:8,13 157:14 158:22 159:1,11, 12,13,18, 19 160:18 162:3 164:4 165:6,10, 14,15,16, 21 166:4, 14,19 167:4,9 168:2,4 169:13 170:20 175:6 179:17,18 180:5 emailed 78:1 141:18 emails 75:11 86:4 131:3,19 133:7 135:22 143:12,17 162:4,6, 17,20,21 163:5 164:17 166:5,22, 23 167:10, 11,14 171:1 emergency 69:2 174:4 employed 10:22 54:2 108:18,23 employee 54:22 83:7,9 117:21 employees 69:6 employer 107:8,9 employment 10:11 18:22 117:7,8, 12 119:3 employment- related 19:7 encompassed 63:12 end 10:8 12:6 58:7 59:6 71:2 90:9,12 92:10 110:4 126:5 145:15,23 152:3 164:2 166:7 169:9 ended 112:14 145:5 engage 20:16 21:6 27:18 32:10,21 33:22 engaged 33:11 119:16 engagement 31:23 103:10 104:2 105:7,16 179:19 engaging 27:12 32:1 33:9 enormous 164:1 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: Dtc's..enormous 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 200.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com enter 82:18 83:10 entered 25:18 150:12 entering 82:19 152:13 entire 17:8,12, 13 31:22 89:14 158:7 entities 94:11 136:17 138:21 entity 103:3 entry 55:17,19 56:7 erasing 47:3 Eric 122:15 179:17,23 essentially 60:19 established 27:16 36:1 estate 64:17 evaluation 55:18 56:2 84:21 event 7:6 8:16 37:8 events 15:4 43:20 44:11 eventually 144:4 everybody's 103:22 evidence 102:8 104:18,21 127:8 149:19 exact 37:5 45:16 107:14 108:4 153:7 examination 6:6 149:7 examples 103:5 exchange 174:7 exchanged 67:17 excluding 99:14,20 100:11 exclusively 65:3 execute 23:6 executed 59:5 executing 18:20 57:16 execution 21:4 22:18 exhibit 60:6 61:9 68:19 69:1 75:7 81:21 96:17,18 121:20,23 122:1,4 130:16,19 146:22 153:18,20 154:13 155:6,8 165:6 172:13 174:10, 17,18,19 175:12 exhibits 97:20 exist 71:16 124:7 existed 45:1 expect 7:19 21:11 24:6 expected 21:16,18 expecting 30:21 experience 15:5 124:8 expert 13:22 14:4,5,10 21:12,16 expertise 21:19 explain 17:5 42:16 89:13 91:13,19 132:21 137:7 138:7 168:9 173:6 explained 42:21 115:2 124:23 132:19 139:22 166:14 176:2,3 explaining 176:8 explanation 38:14 73:4 74:2,5,8 99:19 167:7 explicit 47:6 86:11 95:19 explicitly 40:15 89:18 126:20 137:20,22 express 46:5 expressed 96:19 159:10 expressing 158:6 extinguish 47:1 extinguishi ng 47:3 F face 53:9 76:11 77:3 127:4 fact 7:6 15:4 31:15 51:10 67:3 97:19 98:6 100:22 101:6 109:2 138:4 161:9 162:6 facts 33:4 81:21 149:2 factual 84:19 149:17,18 failed 45:21 112:13 fair 18:22 19:13 35:18 39:1 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: enter..fair 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 201.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 71:14,17 83:8 133:13,15 153:5 178:16 fairly 81:8 87:19 fall 50:5,6 52:11 69:15 falls 63:20 familiar 18:1 familiarity 17:17 family 102:7 fault 77:10,17 81:20 favor 148:20 February 58:10,12, 15 90:6 141:1,4, 17 142:13 143:2 155:12 162:3 169:10 feed 168:12 feel 72:6 84:3 154:8 180:23 feelings 96:10 129:5 Feels 87:22 fees 131:8,9, 16 132:13 fell 118:1 felt 28:2,3 52:2 field 139:17 147:10 162:2 file 59:7 63:23 114:18 127:11 filed 29:6 30:4 36:1 47:14 48:15 49:20 51:10 57:22 58:4,9 59:4 77:6 94:11 113:4,6,7 115:4 142:11 143:4 148:5 filing 52:2 64:1 115:3 140:18 142:12,17 Fillmore 93:13 final 22:22 26:1,11 27:4 42:14 67:4 105:7 112:11 177:5 finalizatio n 57:8 finalized 57:19 59:23 112:18 finally 12:4 26:10 59:4 145:10,13 finance 12:20,23 13:9,12 financial 25:20,22 financially 151:22 152:1 financing 24:16 find 51:4 80:1 83:20 108:13,14 126:14 fine 29:3 fingers 7:17 finished 12:4,5 58:11 fire 16:7 30:12 33:17 34:16,17 35:4 39:17 46:3,9 47:8 51:19 53:21 57:11 100:13, 16,23 101:7,9, 11 102:4, 5,6,14, 20,22 103:12 106:11 109:21 110:15 112:3 113:19,20 114:20 115:1 119:23 124:6 151:15 firing 18:19 19:4 firm 29:2 32:3 54:2 92:4,9 94:18 95:6,21 96:23 98:14 100:3 108:17,21 117:6,12 119:16 firms 14:6 95:8,20 first-time 7:6 fit 52:11 56:15 flowchart 117:22 focused 118:9 follow 91:22 170:21 177:10 follow-up 52:6 foremost 8:9 forever 87:22 forewarned 78:2 form 6:19,20 13:19 14:2,8,14 16:19 17:3,9,23 18:10,17 19:1,9,17 21:14 23:20 24:11 25:6 26:15,18 27:9,22 28:7,19 29:14,23 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: fairly..form 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 202.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 30:8,17, 21 31:3, 10 32:9, 22 33:23 34:9 35:19 36:16 37:13 38:2,19 39:4,14, 23 40:10 41:4,17 42:18 43:3,14 44:4,17 45:8 47:16,22 48:23 49:15 50:8,14 52:12,22 53:14 54:4,13, 20 55:15, 22 56:18 57:5 58:2,23 59:20 60:15 67:9,21 68:10 73:11 78:5,18 83:2 96:5 99:4,22 109:16 110:12,22 111:19 113:5,11 117:15 118:2,8, 23 119:7, 19 120:8, 22 130:5 132:1 134:18 141:20 161:6 163:10 165:1 171:23 177:2 178:17 formal 11:15 12:13 13:3 15:10 16:2 36:11 89:21 120:1 150:19 166:20 formally 79:16,20, 22 80:11 82:5 140:9 150:18 157:16 158:2 159:20 format 8:20 forward 65:10 82:1 98:11 166:5 167:11 170:23 found 126:10 128:8 136:3 four-page 130:22 fourth 122:22 174:22 175:5 frame 12:12 35:10 145:14 169:5,19 Fred 66:5,6 87:3 125:13 129:3 156:9,11, 14,21 159:7 181:9 frequently 125:14 front 81:19 87:23 127:22 147:1 frustrated 126:8 frustration 125:17 full 6:11,23 7:14 8:4 33:16 46:2,6 51:18 89:8 178:20 fully 9:21 91:7 152:10 function 34:13 funding 22:20 48:17 77:13 101:8 109:21 110:15 113:20 115:20 155:21 funds 26:13,17 furnace 22:5 future 116:16 157:19 G G-E-R-R-Y 147:6 Garofalo 66:5,6 87:4 125:1,4 129:3 156:9,11 Garofalo's 129:7 gathered 100:16 gathering 170:3 gave 37:1 43:20 44:12 45:18 75:10 78:1 104:23 165:8 gears 115:22 general 18:6,12 20:19 24:5,9 34:11 43:2 64:23 85:14 105:10 108:9 131:10 142:10,16 147:23 149:8,11 156:5 162:1 167:8 169:12 generally 18:14,22 20:14 23:16 27:20 29:10,21 35:16 62:16 77:22 117:21 generate 71:3 generated 104:3 Gerry 86:4 147:6,7, 8,10 150:2 155:12 gist 126:7 Giuda 155:23 156:3 160:6 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: formal..Giuda 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 203.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com give 7:14 8:4, 13,21 9:21 20:3,10, 19 34:8 40:5 41:23 73:4 74:2 117:13 121:19 giving 8:8 9:23 14:11,20, 22 15:2 34:6 46:2 74:5 gloves 170:14 goal 100:13,23 good 17:20 25:13 35:12 61:1 62:8 72:2 99:1,7 101:3,18 115:23 138:22,23 165:19 166:4 173:2 174:12 goodness 84:16 Gotcha 147:17 govern 149:13 governance 17:8,23 22:2 23:9 governing 17:11 government 10:19 12:20,22 13:9,12 14:23 15:15,18 17:4 18:8,17 26:15 77:21 83:2 118:2,8 119:1,7, 19 120:22 governors 11:19 12:22 Grafton 94:9 Graham 173:9 174:3 175:7,8 grant 94:2 146:7 great 93:10 133:22 gross 51:15 179:22 ground 7:7 Group 118:20 131:5 136:14 guarantee 43:16 guarded 136:18 137:5,6 138:15 139:15 140:9 guess 72:2 105:19 106:13 151:17 153:10 160:17 guidance 18:2 142:17 144:23 guys 75:17 146:20 165:17 H habit 8:12 hairs 173:10 half 59:18 135:10 166:16 halfway 88:1 hall 102:16 143:7 hallway 127:19 Hampshire 10:13 11:1 13:1 14:7 15:1,17 18:4 56:10 83:1 122:14,19 137:3 140:1,4, 13 157:20 160:3 161:3,14, 15 handed 34:14 61:8 handled 144:14 handling 36:4 116:22 139:8 hands 24:8 165:13 handwritten 154:4 happen 92:16,20 93:21 103:14 124:7 150:22,23 151:1 177:17 happened 20:1 115:7 142:21 148:4 167:19 169:4,9 happening 135:14 168:7 harm 133:22 135:9 136:11,13 139:3,11 144:6 harmed 139:20 140:3,12 Hatch 87:4 Haverhill 10:13,23 15:1,9, 12,16,22 16:1,5,22 17:1,2,4, 8 18:3,9, 16 19:12 20:16 23:9 30:12 33:16,19 35:14 47:10 48:15 53:12,20 54:10,16 56:14,23 58:15,21 59:12,17 60:6 64:8 66:4 68:17,19 76:16 77:8 80:23 91:11 100:5 103:2,11, 21 104:9, 20 105:20 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: give..Haverhill 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 204.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 106:15, 18,22 107:3 108:10 110:11, 15,16,21 112:8 113:18, 21,23 116:11,16 121:3,4,7 124:2,12 135:7 138:5 150:8 160:5 161:2,5, 19 Haverhill's 28:13 104:10 Hawkins 30:10 51:14,21 53:19,23 74:20 99:6 104:6 108:16, 18,22 109:3,5,6 110:2 112:5 113:17,22 114:7 122:8,16, 22 123:12 125:20 131:4 132:4,10 139:5 176:18 179:16 Hawkins' 115:10 head 8:11 21:10 22:12 25:11 26:8,20 42:14 58:1 heading 50:6 51:5 56:15 154:7 heads 22:12 23:15,18 24:10,14, 18 heard 103:22 125:21 hearing 94:3 136:21 140:6 169:9 heck 9:10 34:23 held 94:3 highlighted 61:16 highway 48:16 77:12 101:8 110:16 170:13 highways 21:20 hindered 138:20 hire 21:18 74:13,21 75:2 98:1,13, 17,18 105:3,6 109:7 119:21 hired 49:23 51:8,13, 16,20 109:10 125:5,15 hiring 18:19 19:4 73:9,17 117:12 125:2 129:8 historical 84:19 104:11 163:1,14 historicall y 34:13 98:20 history 162:12 hold 80:14 88:8 hone 138:4 honestly 163:12 Hope 175:17 horse 35:6 hour 166:16 hourly 19:5 Howard 87:4 156:16 HR 19:7,11 118:20 119:16 human 18:22 21:20 Hundred- and- something 162:13 hundreds 164:13,17 hurt 138:19,20 hypothetica l 33:1,2 hypothetica lly 142:14 I idea 42:4 56:4 80:4 99:6 123:8 178:1 identificat ion 60:8 68:20 75:8 122:2 130:20 146:23 153:19 155:7 165:7 172:14 174:11 identified 114:23 identify 173:6 illegal 156:6 immediately 72:22 94:19 impact 72:7 impartial 105:19 impartialit y 103:9,17 104:19 implicate 109:14 important 9:6 164:21 impossible 164:3 impression 180:8 in-depth 74:7 inactions 139:1,2 include BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: Haverhill's..include 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 205.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 121:5 included 19:3 111:21 117:4,11 includes 17:14 including 99:19 136:14 incredibly 164:1,9 169:11 independent ly 44:7 132:5 indicating 95:13 175:21 indication 86:21 98:12 103:16 104:19 105:17 114:12 individual 14:20 47:12 50:18 73:20 78:23 79:1,3,14 80:12 81:1 86:14 88:17 89:19 167:23 individuall y 78:22 157:2 individuals 21:18 142:16 147:9 154:18 infer 107:5 inference 149:3 inferences 148:20 informal 81:8 informally 140:8 information 32:19 43:17 84:7,11, 15,19 85:1,7, 13,14,17 86:1 94:12 100:3,7,9 101:4 102:8 137:10 150:16 156:3 162:7,22 163:7 164:2,20 167:19 168:13,22 169:1,16, 18,21 170:4 171:3 180:12,14 informed 137:18 initial 83:8 initially 7:12 72:23 82:23 96:2 127:14 150:17 initiate 47:14 48:21 injure 139:11 injured 139:20 140:3,12 172:5 injury 138:17 143:21 input 28:3 153:4 insert 165:11 inside 86:16 insignifica nt 171:5 insistent 123:12 insisting 180:21 instance 8:17 149:9 instruction 158:21 instrumenta l 136:4 insuperable 109:4 intend 41:2 intended 40:19 42:13 43:17 46:1 74:3,13, 21 178:15 intends 123:5 intent 37:16 38:6,7,8, 14 40:7 41:22 46:5,14 73:22 75:1 98:1,4,6 131:8,15 160:7 179:4,8 intention 178:9,21 interact 114:8,13 138:9,21 interacted 137:8,17 interacting 114:2 143:22 interaction 164:12 interaction s 138:1 144:8 interchange able 34:18 interconnec ted 115:15,19 interest 37:10,21 40:21 41:14 44:2,16 45:7 47:5 69:17,19 71:4,8, 10,11,18 72:10 108:17,22 115:8,9 117:2 177:1 interim 76:7,8 interrogato ry 107:18 invalid 87:2 investigati on 14:18 invoice 55:17,20 invoices 24:23 25:2,9, 11,15 121:9,13 129:20, 22,23 130:9 131:21 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: included..invoices 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 206.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 132:8 133:11,19 135:22 involve 109:14 involved 22:7,9 23:10,16 30:3,7,11 43:21 47:10 53:16 56:6,8 57:9 63:10 92:8 99:9 109:7 110:10 111:14 112:7 133:3 143:19 176:18 involvement 20:14 involves 48:5 issue 31:2 35:23 36:15 45:11 53:2 56:9,12, 19 57:3 58:1 73:10,18 74:14 76:11,14, 17 77:3 88:16,21 89:4 90:21 91:4,16 92:1,6,18 94:14 96:4 97:1 98:16 99:2 110:6,14, 17 112:6 113:16 114:1,7, 15 117:7 121:2,10 124:3 125:3,6 129:9 130:3,8 131:22,23 134:3,8, 10,16,23 136:10 138:2 146:4 162:5 175:4 176:23 177:23 issued 33:16 34:5 58:5 issues 81:15 138:5 149:14,18 176:16 178:13 issuing 56:21 94:6 items 135:21 iteration 105:23 iterations 105:15 J James 86:4 147:5,10 Jamie 139:16 147:8,10 January 11:23 12:10,18 13:2 58:7,8 69:4 70:17 74:18 75:4,12, 22 77:23 88:2,12 89:23 90:12 92:5,16, 18 93:21 95:15,18 96:14 97:3 99:11,21 100:11 108:16 109:1,9 112:5 113:8 122:8,14 123:3 124:21 145:17 146:11 147:2,17 150:1 153:2,17 154:17 169:7 174:1,2 175:1,2 176:15 177:20 179:11 Jennifer 41:21 69:8 84:14 91:20 92:2 97:2 99:17 117:18 118:4,12, 19 128:2 129:14 152:15 153:4,6 158:16 176:16 178:9,11, 21 179:16 Jim 6:13 job 11:6 99:1 Johnston 93:13 judgment 28:14 81:15 116:13 121:21 130:16 147:23 148:3,15, 16,19 149:12,20 170:8 171:16 172:10,17 181:15 Justice 122:20 K Katie 101:16,22 164:13,17 165:21 168:11 169:22 keeping 158:16 Kevin 45:12 46:5 101:15,21 131:11 163:21 165:16,20 166:2,18, 19 168:11 169:19 170:2,17 Kevin's 45:20 167:9 168:4 kind 12:15 13:14 19:8 21:1 24:23 67:5,23 72:16 81:13 94:16 125:17 127:12 132:19 143:3 145:11 146:2 150:13 168:1 180:2 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: involve..kind 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 207.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com KLINE 6:13,15, 17,19,21 13:19 14:2,8,14 16:19 17:9 18:10 19:1,9,17 21:14 23:20 24:11 25:6 26:18 27:9,22 28:7,19 29:14,23 30:8,17 31:3,10 32:9,22 33:23 34:9 35:19 36:16 37:13 38:2,19 39:4,14, 23 40:10 41:4,17 42:18 43:14 44:4,17 45:8 47:16,22 48:23 49:15 50:8,14 52:12,22 53:14 54:4,13, 20 55:15, 22 56:18 57:5 58:2,23 59:20 60:3,10 67:9,21 68:10 73:11 78:5,18 79:18 80:6,14 81:11,13 96:5 99:4,22 109:16 110:12,22 111:19 113:5,11 115:22 117:15 120:8 130:5 132:1 134:18 141:20 142:7 147:20,22 148:2,9 158:8 160:15 161:6 163:10,15 165:1 170:5,7 171:7,9, 23 177:2 178:17 181:18 Knapp 45:13 46:5 101:15,21 163:21 165:16,20 166:2 169:19 knew 30:13 42:11 92:13 145:16 176:21 178:4 knots 7:18 know's 139:14 knowing 10:3 knowledge 32:18 80:3 123:11 knowledgeab le 21:12 kosher 26:7 L labeled 121:19 labored 136:16,22 138:5 lack 103:16 104:19 132:15 Lake 15:13 Lakes 69:21 70:11 72:5 language 150:12 larger 24:22 late 90:6 latest 174:15 Laura 122:19 law 14:6 29:2 32:3 54:2 92:4,9 95:6,8, 20,21 96:23 98:14 100:3 108:17,21 111:5,18, 21 117:6, 12 119:16 laws 161:15,22 lawsuit 29:4,7 43:20 44:12 47:9,15, 20 48:4, 8,14,22 49:10,17 50:5 51:1,2,4, 9 52:8 56:23 57:4,13, 23 59:2,3 65:14 66:12 68:9,17 76:14,17, 23 77:7, 14 110:11,20 111:2,14 112:8,13, 19 113:9, 13 115:11 116:10 181:16 lawyer 119:21 lawyers 54:7 73:10,17 74:4 95:4 98:2,11, 17 105:3 109:1 123:9 layers 15:15,18 24:19 25:8,10 lead 88:9,15, 21 90:20 91:3,15, 17 leadership 11:20 leading 78:20 leave 104:14 left 8:20 9:2 37:19 38:15 39:12,21 42:13 58:22 legal 13:23 14:4 29:11,18 34:15 36:5 37:3,11 38:16 39:10,16 40:22 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: KLINE..legal 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 208.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 41:14 42:10 46:2,8,17 47:21 48:6,19 49:9,11 50:4,6,21 51:3,5, 11,18 52:10,18 53:10,11 54:9,18 55:6,10 56:15 62:1 63:4,6,8, 15,18,20, 23 64:1, 2,10,13, 21,23 65:8,17 67:14 68:5 71:21 105:2 110:17 113:22,23 116:23 117:10 118:9,13 119:3,9, 10,22 121:9 123:23 140:4 152:4 155:19 156:10,11 158:12,13 159:4 legally 83:19 124:7 legislation 48:13 109:23 111:3 112:7 155:23 160:8 legitimatel y 145:21 LEHMANN 120:11 142:4 148:14, 18,22 149:6,11, 16 172:9, 15 181:17 length 95:7 letter 32:1 56:21 58:5 92:10 96:21 103:10 104:2 105:7,16 106:1 136:2 144:11, 13,15 145:1,4, 15 176:2, 5 179:20, 23 180:5, 17 181:2, 8 letters 28:23 133:6 letting 58:10 59:4 123:20 level 165:5 levels 175:3 liar 149:21 licensed 13:17 licenses 13:13 licensing 13:11 limited 148:3 limiting 81:14 lines 20:23 25:15 61:15 77:2 94:14 144:3 157:21 164:6 list 95:6 135:21 literally 63:8,22 164:13,17 litigated 53:19 110:3 litigating 77:13 155:21 litigation 109:15,23 110:5 111:1 112:18 116:15 live 14:22 lives 102:4 log 83:3 logs 83:7 Lombardi 122:19 long 10:3,15 11:10 34:23 145:9 179:18 longer 33:21,22 36:18 37:9 46:15 looked 32:6 40:13 75:15,18 127:23 128:3 175:12 lot 24:13 26:3 67:3 84:9,18 100:21 144:6 162:21 167:20 169:22 lots 103:5 lump 147:18 150:2 151:19 lunch 116:6 Lynnette 122:8 M Macomber 122:8 made 23:3 27:14 38:10 40:5 43:8 44:6 46:1,19 58:8,16 61:17 72:19 73:21 74:20 85:14 88:19 98:8 100:2 106:21 107:21,23 108:6 109:5 112:12 126:8,18 127:6,10 128:21 129:14 148:23 152:9,11, 18,23 160:6,9 167:18 170:17 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: legally..made 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 209.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 178:10,14 179:6 Maher 122:15 124:22 179:17,23 mailed 12:12 127:16 maintenance 21:19 22:12 majority 143:11 make 24:14,18 26:23 42:9 45:13 49:4 50:11 61:23 70:12,22 75:16 86:23 88:17 89:20 93:8 112:13 116:16 120:1,18 124:10,13 127:2 157:6 162:2 makes 59:12 making 26:21 49:8 50:20 75:17 89:6 116:22 161:8 management 11:20 19:11 manager 10:23 11:8 17:3,5,6, 17,21 18:3,7, 12,15,17, 21 19:15, 23 20:8, 9,10,14 21:7 22:8 23:14,17 24:7 25:8,23 26:14,16 27:8,11, 14,15,17 32:17 35:14,21 37:7,23 46:6,23 50:2 53:4 58:19 67:23 71:9 81:9 82:16 86:23 88:22 92:3 101:1 116:19 118:1,6, 10,15,16, 23 119:7, 11,19,23 126:13 148:7 150:8,9 158:5,10 159:2 161:4,18, 21 166:3, 18 176:4 manager's 23:13 25:1,4 36:3 160:12 managers 161:22 manner 8:14 18:6 March 45:10 61:12 63:5 90:6,7,8, 9,12,16 141:13 171:17 mark 60:2 121:22 marked 60:7 61:9 68:20 69:1 75:7 113:3 122:1,4 130:19 146:22 153:18,20 155:6 165:6 172:13 174:11 markings 113:2 master's 11:19,21 match 174:19 materials 21:9 24:1,9,21 25:4 Matt 87:4 156:9,14, 21 matter 30:5,7 37:2 39:22 42:10 48:9,10, 11 51:22 63:8,16, 18 64:10 65:17 68:5 70:1 75:3 91:21 92:10,12 103:20 105:11 109:12, 14,18 112:15 113:16 114:22 115:20 130:14 134:22 151:16 155:21 177:7 matters 33:17 34:15 36:5 37:3,11, 20 38:16, 17 39:10, 16 40:22 41:14 46:3,8,17 47:21 48:6,19 49:9,11 50:4,7,21 51:3,5,19 52:10 55:14 56:16 62:1 63:4,6,21 64:13,23 65:8,11, 12 69:15 98:15,20 99:8 105:5,11, 12,22 116:23 117:10 119:15 132:4 Matuszko 122:23 meaning 15:4 32:15 38:7 47:1 88:20 156:21 meant 102:19 107:5 meet 146:18 meeting 22:23 34:5 36:11 43:6 45:11,12 46:4,12 60:7 61:12 62:5,11, 18,22 68:3,20 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: Maher..meeting 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 210.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 69:3 75:4 79:5,11, 15,20,23 84:8,12 85:18,22, 23 86:2, 3,10 87:12 89:16,22 90:3,5,9, 11 92:15, 21,22 93:1,4, 11,12,21, 23 95:14, 17 96:14 97:3 102:23 104:22 106:20 111:10 119:14, 18,20 120:2,5, 6,14 135:23 140:20 141:12 145:19 146:6,12 156:12,22 157:9 158:19 159:3,7,9 169:3,8 171:20 174:4 177:9,19 181:4 meetings 20:11,12, 13 23:5 38:9 45:22 55:8 62:9,17 79:2 81:3 86:17 100:12 102:21 106:12 130:13 156:11,17 169:4,7 meetings[ sic 79:1 meets 90:10 member 51:11 74:11 89:13,20 102:11 106:17 165:22 166:3 members 30:13 39:3 43:8,18, 22 44:3, 13 45:1, 23 46:21 47:1 50:19 55:5 56:2,5 73:8,14 75:1,5 78:22 79:7,14 80:13 81:2 86:14,18, 19,20 88:17 89:5 91:20 96:22 97:23 98:10 100:22 101:22 128:13 156:2,7 163:18 164:19 members' 38:14 memorialize 65:20 memorialize d 81:7 memory 153:13 154:22 157:10 mentioned 180:5 message 123:2 160:21 174:7 175:15 176:10 177:5 messages 172:13 173:8,21 174:3,10, 23 175:10 180:4 met 131:10 micromanage 159:1 mid- february 87:9,16 middle 57:7,16 128:20 129:1 169:2,3 Mike 101:18 173:8 174:3 175:7,8 mind 7:22 75:6 144:10 minds 35:8 mine 65:3 minor 72:12 minute 104:23 minutes 38:8,21, 23 40:9, 12,16,17, 23 41:9 42:5 43:5 55:8 60:7 61:12 62:5,11, 19,21 68:20 69:3 78:20 86:8,12 95:1,13 96:15 97:16 102:21 106:19,20 107:11,20 108:13 159:5 misbehaving 161:2 misremember ing 12:11 misundersta nding 73:5 misundersto od 73:3,6 Mitchell 118:20 131:5 136:14 moment 7:10 98:1 125:12 money 65:16 67:4,5,6, 12,17,19 68:1 110:19 146:7 month 128:6 morning 166:4 motion 38:10 40:5 41:21 44:6 45:13,20, 21 46:1, 19 61:17, 21 98:5,7 116:13 120:1,19 130:16 171:16 178:10, 14,22 179:6 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: meetings..motion 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 211.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 181:15 motions 81:15 121:20 Mountain 15:12 69:21 70:11 72:5 move 82:1 98:10 multiple 154:5 municipal 16:17 24:4 118:20 137:3,4 140:1,4, 14 147:13 municipalit ies 136:20 161:23 N named 101:20 names 15:11 16:3 Naomi 118:21 131:5 132:3 narratives 131:10 narrow 35:9 necessarily 84:8 95:22 109:3 142:2 needed 20:22 21:9 22:5,6,13 28:2,3 35:17 64:10 67:6 85:7,13 91:22 94:5 138:21 152:4 177:19 180:17,18 181:9 needing 155:2 negative 107:6,7 120:12 negotiated 57:15 112:21 negotiation s 66:10,19, 20 112:10 newest 174:15 newly 44:19 90:10 news 108:14 newspaper 107:21 newspapers 108:1 NHMA 137:2 nicely 145:1 176:1,4 night 97:20 nodding 8:11 non- departed 148:19 nonmeeting 177:7,15, 17,22 178:3 nonmoving 148:18 149:13 nonpublic 38:12,21 39:1 40:18 41:1,9 60:7 61:12 62:6,13, 18,20,22 95:17 99:10,20 100:12 120:4,9, 16,17 normal 7:20 North 15:12 16:23 17:1 Norwich 11:18 notation 154:4 note 181:13 notes 43:5 81:6 notice 145:12,19 notificatio ns 166:21 notified 94:4 notorious 168:11 number 12:16 62:8 78:1 96:16 167:5 numerous 170:19 O O'SHANA 80:16 oath 61:7 116:7 171:14 object 60:14 objection 13:19 14:2,8,14 16:19 17:9 18:10 19:1,9,17 21:14 23:20 24:11 25:6 26:18 27:9,22 28:7,19 29:14,23 30:8,17 31:3,10 32:9,22 33:23 34:9 35:19 36:16 37:13 38:2,19 39:4,14, 23 40:10 41:4,17 42:18 43:14 44:4,17 45:8 47:16,22 48:23 49:15 50:8,14 52:12,22 53:14 54:4,13, 20 55:15, 22 56:18 57:5 58:2,23 59:20 67:9,21 68:10 73:11 78:5,18 79:18 80:6 81:11 96:5 99:4,22 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: motions..objection 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 212.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 109:16 110:12,22 111:19 113:5,11 117:15 120:8 130:5 132:1 134:18 141:20 147:20 158:8 160:15 161:6 163:10,15 165:1 170:5 171:23 172:9,16 177:2 178:17 objections 6:17 60:11 obtain 11:21 63:23 occur 20:6 86:16 125:7 occurred 35:13 36:11 37:4,8 44:11 79:10 81:2 128:7 141:13 178:3 occurring 177:15 odd 103:23 offensive 108:7 offer 16:10 20:9 offers 16:21 office 55:1 79:6 82:14 84:10 100:23 103:8,13, 20 104:10, 13,14,15 115:5 122:20 125:13 127:15, 16,20 128:2 156:23 157:8 158:15 164:14 171:18,21 officer 12:20 13:12 Officer's 12:23 offices 125:1 official 34:4 103:19 officially 34:4 omissions 139:1 on-boarding 90:11 one-page 147:1 one-time 56:7 ongoing 77:15 open 139:16 operated 71:14 operating 89:17 90:1,14 operation 48:18 operations 18:19 109:22 110:15 opinion 53:1,3 72:9 100:18 144:5,7 155:19 156:10,11 159:4,8 opportunity 26:9 100:6 opposition 81:16 oppositiona l 101:7 129:15 order 81:14 128:4,5 148:3 ordered 24:14 organizatio ns 137:1 original 48:14 75:11 originally 26:20 46:1 72:18 other's 70:3 out-of- district 16:23 outcome 42:6 181:15 overlapped 115:18 oversees 17:7 overwhelmed 164:18 overwhelmin g 164:14 owed 57:11 P p.m. 75:23 122:15 174:5 181:20 packet 171:2 174:15 pages 172:21 173:6 174:1,14, 16,17,18 175:11 paid 25:12 29:21 121:15 paragraph 69:6,11 76:12 116:14 131:3,7 161:13 171:15 paragraphs 76:10 parameters 50:6 part 18:8 23:19 66:20 67:13 76:21 78:7 151:20 153:1 155:3 parties 65:19 67:8 70:21 71:13 partner 108:23 party 59:10 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: objections..party 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 213.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 149:13 passed 141:15 past 28:6 69:22 70:10,12 71:21 99:3 152:16 Pause 60:23 75:9 173:1 pay 19:5 49:22 67:19 121:8,11, 14 129:23 130:3,4,9 131:8,15 paying 24:16 25:9 payment 26:12 57:12 58:8,16 59:12,14 67:6,12 112:11,14 129:20 payments 24:20 26:21 65:15 112:17 116:16 peers 161:21 pending 181:14 people 19:11 21:22 83:23 101:20 114:9 133:8 138:8,14 161:14 percent 53:16 perform 55:6 133:10 136:11 performance 117:7 119:15 performed 24:3 25:3 52:18 113:22 124:2,18 135:6 performing 34:13 periodic 20:2 permission 159:17 person 14:21 45:19 53:3 personal 51:11 173:18 personally 36:2 51:6 personnel 55:13 105:11, 12,22 129:9 131:22 perspective 51:8,9, 18,23 103:22 132:18,23 133:16 135:12 138:19 161:8 164:23 167:21 168:20 180:11 Peter 92:19,22 93:14 114:9 122:13 123:8,14, 17,19 135:15 136:1 137:9 139:6,7, 13 144:5 145:2 162:10,21 petition 28:14 47:13 48:21 49:13 82:21 87:8 150:12 petitioned 148:4 petitions 82:11,12 83:18 140:19 142:11 151:1 phase 25:5 83:8 phone 93:15 125:19 143:12, 14,18,20, 22 164:7 167:5,7 173:17, 18,19 photocopies 172:21 photograph 165:9,10 phrase 9:17 24:7 28:6 48:5 63:2,6,20 64:13 114:3 176:1 pick 116:8 143:14 picked 146:17,19 picking 24:2 Pike 16:1 place 38:11 92:21 157:7 play 168:18 played 33:4 67:2 156:19 playing 162:2 pled 76:16 point 8:19 10:3,4,8 44:8 46:7 56:1 58:20 70:20 76:7 78:21 88:1 98:4,13, 19 99:15 101:12 116:12 126:9 127:18 130:1 145:5,8 176:14,20 179:10 180:16 pointed 89:18 91:5 pointedly 125:23 pointing 114:23 160:13,20 police 16:4 policies 27:1 political 28:4 poor 9:11 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: passed..poor 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 214.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com poorly 9:13 portal 82:18 83:4 150:18,23 152:4 portion 131:4 posed 10:7 position 10:16 11:6,10 15:3 17:19 31:8 36:3 52:1 73:16 74:3 90:19 97:22 113:15 124:4,5 126:12 128:16 129:7,11 135:6 136:7 146:3 148:6 149:6 160:12 possession 100:4 126:20 possibility 176:18 post 68:8,15 pot 110:19 potentially 179:9 power 32:20 33:21 34:8 36:13,22 37:2,9,19 38:15 39:13,21 40:7,19 41:2 43:23 45:5 46:15 47:4 50:23 61:23 119:2,8 practice 13:17 pre- approval 27:19 163:8 pre-reveal 78:9 precariousn ess 160:9 precedent 161:10 Precinct 62:2 63:4 64:3 65:2 preparing 169:5 prepping 169:3 prereview 82:15 150:4,5, 19,21 151:2,5, 10,21 153:2 155:3 163:9 prescribes 18:6 present 23:2 48:4 51:2 52:8 69:7,9 80:16 89:22 125:9 presentatio n 60:14 presented 26:11 42:3 preserved 6:17 60:11 presume 7:8 9:9, 22 153:12 presuming 118:7 pretty 41:22 87:20 101:18 123:17 previous 12:2 45:23 95:1 101:6 115:10 previously 49:6 50:17 170:2 Primarily 28:12 printed 8:20 printout 165:9,15 printouts 174:16 prior 10:21 11:2 17:23 66:11 69:23 70:1 77:22 87:11 138:23 141:17 142:12 143:2,19 156:8,13 169:20 problem 56:9,12 77:15 91:6 94:16 114:2 problematic 71:17 procedural 92:15,20 93:20,23 145:18 146:6,7 procedure 177:10 procedures 27:2 89:17 90:1,14 process 21:2,3,7 22:17 23:4 24:22 27:16 31:23 32:6,21 33:10,12 78:7,11 81:9 82:7 91:8,22 95:3 96:1 151:5,10, 21 153:2 155:3 163:9 produce 71:3 93:10 95:5 produced 62:16 96:21 104:6 105:16 127:12 producing 106:5 product 168:5 products 23:11 24:1 prohibited 33:8,9,14 project 11:9 22:15 projects 22:21 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: poorly..projects 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 215.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 23:2,5 proper 26:6 161:10,11 properly 94:3 181:5 property 20:18 63:11 64:17 74:13 proponents 111:23 proscriptio n 103:17 104:11 protect 137:12, 14,15 138:15 protecting 136:17 prove 149:16 provide 8:9 10:7 11:14 16:12 20:7 30:2 54:17 57:10 85:11 89:7 119:2,9, 21 135:7, 9,11 provided 18:2 23:11 25:3 28:16 29:11,18 51:12 54:10,18 55:11 84:11 85:2 112:2 121:9 135:5 145:11 173:16 providing 14:12 86:1 163:1 173:13,20 public 20:12,13 36:11 46:12 62:17 74:18 79:2,5, 11,14,23 81:3 83:13 86:16,17 94:3 95:14 104:22 120:6,14, 18 134:21 156:22 158:19 159:7 publicly 89:21 119:13 120:2,5 177:9,19 181:4 pull 107:11 108:1 purchase 170:14 purported 51:12 purports 48:9 purpose 35:5 46:2 119:14 purposes 16:12 pursuing 53:21 purview 18:21 pushy 180:21 put 22:5,18 33:10 51:4 78:15 99:20 100:11 111:4,9, 17 128:3, 4,19,20 135:8 141:11 149:17 150:18 puts 166:19 167:4 Q question 7:16,20 8:1,2,10, 17 9:7, 13,15,21, 23 10:6 14:17 20:19 22:1 26:9 50:12,16 52:6 55:9 60:14,22 82:19 83:12,13, 21 108:20 116:9 120:11 125:18 168:15,17 169:12 176:23 questioning 42:22 43:10 questions 7:14 9:11 14:13 28:13 83:16,17 132:15 133:6 151:7 162:11 166:9 181:13 quick 60:4 quorum 89:22 104:22 quote 52:9 quote/ unquote 25:10 32:16 97:11 158:2 quoted 103:1 106:13 R radar 81:22 ran 172:3 rapid-fire 169:5 rarely 166:19 167:4 rate 31:1,6,23 32:3 36:15 48:8,11 56:13 73:10,18 74:14 75:3 76:11,18 77:3,5,11 89:4 90:21 91:4,15, 21 92:1, 6,9,12, 14,18 93:22 94:6,8,11 96:4 98:16 105:11 109:12, 13,18 112:6 114:1,6, 15,19,21, 22 121:2 123:5,6, BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: proper..rate 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 216.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 13,21 124:18 125:3 129:8 131:22 134:4,10, 22 136:4 145:3,10, 12,20 146:4 162:5 175:4,16 176:6 177:7 178:13 rates 19:5 175:17 ratify 177:8 rating 99:2 reach 22:3 97:3,11, 21 140:4 167:16 reached 85:5 132:5 137:9 140:17 156:1 reaching 142:9 read 29:5 60:22 74:18 83:9 107:19 156:11 159:7,23 166:10 167:10 reading 9:2 129:2 reads 9:4 ready 60:22 128:23 169:7,8 real 64:17 72:14 realize 99:18 realm 52:16 reared 58:1 reason 28:4 45:18 81:18 101:2,3 142:8 146:10 reasons 68:18 101:3 recall 13:8 36:23 37:3 57:2 58:4 63:5 65:18,21, 23 66:2, 6,14,16 67:2 74:5,11 75:4 86:1 89:3,5 107:12,17 108:11 116:12 125:7 126:10 128:6 130:7 131:17 132:6 139:23 140:22 142:20,23 145:14 152:17,23 153:5,7,8 155:15 156:16 157:4 158:19 159:3 162:4,8, 17,19,20, 21 163:3, 4,13,18 166:14 173:13, 20,23 175:13 receive 11:21 127:21 133:20 received 12:19 25:1 94:2 100:15 104:6 123:14 125:20 128:22 133:21 146:10 166:5 167:12 174:23 receives 93:9 150:11 recent 11:6 recess 60:5 80:15 116:3 171:10 recognize 61:11 recollectio n 94:21 97:9,13, 15 129:6 157:10 159:6 recommend 177:8 record 6:8,11 10:9 55:8 60:3,9,21 61:7 75:16,17 79:13 80:17 93:4 104:23 116:4,7 120:20 135:23 142:4,7 154:2 157:9 171:9,11, 14 recorded 7:12 38:23 78:16 106:13 records 37:6 84:20 156:18 162:9 recruitment 21:2 reelected 171:22 reelection 172:3 refer 28:22 99:16 102:18 129:10 178:22 referred 19:7 30:5 64:3 113:1 referring 56:11 99:3 123:4 143:20 144:9 reflected 38:8 40:8,15, 17,23 95:12 96:14 97:15 133:10,18 135:22 136:2 refuse 131:8,15 refusing 76:18 134:4 regard BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: rates..regard 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 217.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 25:9 65:2 91:21 106:22 118:19 registered 82:12 154:5 regular 13:10 20:2 regularly 136:1,2 140:5 reiterate 80:18 179:3 reiterated 46:11 reiterating 160:6 relate 52:9,20 56:14 110:9 163:14 related 15:2 33:17 34:15,16 39:16 46:3,8,17 47:8 51:19 55:13,17 56:7 62:1 63:4,7 70:2 91:13 94:6 100:4 105:12 113:19 114:19 115:1,19 117:10 123:11 130:13 151:22 152:1,2 155:20,22 160:8,9 relates 47:21 48:19 49:10 51:2 81:22 91:14 relating 36:5 37:3,12 38:17 39:10 40:22 41:14 42:10 47:21 48:6,20 49:9,11 50:4,7,22 51:3 52:10 56:16 64:9 65:8 68:5,9 104:9 108:12 116:23 relation 64:13 89:23 94:23 161:21 relations 99:7 relationshi ps 136:14,23 137:4 138:7,22, 23 relative 167:7 relevant 81:15 rely 23:18 24:10,13 remained 118:12 remember 8:23 9:1 37:5 45:16 76:9 84:17 95:19 107:14 108:3,4,5 113:6 146:15 147:13 151:13,18 156:15 162:4,23 163:12, 17,21,23 173:12,22 174:6,7 remind 8:23 remove 45:13 rep 139:18 147:10 rephrase 14:16 23:22 replaced 22:6,13 replacement 11:8 replicate 154:8 replied 175:17 replies 180:7 reply 89:7 166:17 170:20 report 19:21,23 20:10 reporter 6:3 14:18 reports 84:17 represent 70:14 96:3 109:11 113:18 132:3 representat ion 71:21,22 72:7 105:2 123:23 124:1 165:14 representat ions 69:23 70:2,3 72:6 representat ive 95:1 103:11 represented 30:11 53:23 69:21 70:10,11, 21 71:13 72:4,5 102:21 representin g 69:20 72:21 107:15 reputation 138:19 139:3 140:2,12 reputationa l 143:21 request 29:12,19 85:12,14 93:8 100:2 126:23 127:6,11, 12 132:10 158:6 159:10 164:5 169:12 requested 128:23 155:19 162:8 requesting 86:22 164:20 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: registered..requesting 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 218.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com requests 164:14 168:12 169:20 170:16 173:14 required 58:20 89:8 requirement 104:8 requiring 116:16 requisition 121:14 resident 14:21 54:23 170:22 residents 16:13 168:12 170:4 resolution 67:7 resolve 67:14 134:3,8 135:2 175:4 resolved 92:7 112:19 134:11,12 135:1 resource 18:22 22:5 resources 21:20 respect 8:13 16:18 18:1,3 25:2 28:21 29:4,5 31:7 32:5 35:23 37:11 38:16 40:22 42:10 46:17 49:8 50:1,2, 19,21 51:1,21 52:17 53:10 56:9,12 59:9 60:15 61:20 63:2 65:8 68:16 72:16 73:7,10, 14,16 78:10 82:3 84:5,6,22 85:20 87:14 88:15,20 89:4 90:20 91:3,8 92:1,6,17 96:3 97:8 100:10 104:19 105:20 106:11 108:16 116:19,22 119:6,11 121:2 129:7,19 134:3 136:6 137:23 140:13 143:3,18 152:17 154:13 160:12 166:22 172:6 176:14 177:22 respond 164:19 166:17 168:14 181:7 responded 140:10 180:9 responding 101:19 180:10 response 8:9 89:7, 9,11 90:18,22 144:4,9 164:4 167:13 responses 8:13 162:7 173:14 responsibil ities 17:18,21 18:18 19:12 27:8 160:4 responsibil ity 20:21 21:1 26:23 34:3,12 39:11,20 40:6 41:13 42:9 46:23 49:7 50:21 61:23 64:20 65:1,7 88:8 116:21 117:4 158:10,17 responsible 18:7 23:12 25:16 35:21 restate 9:16 result 77:16 111:16 138:17 retain 74:3,13 75:2 98:11 117:5 119:2,9, 14 126:2 177:7,14, 22 retained 65:9 109:10 125:5 134:1,7 178:16 179:13,19 180:1 retainer 118:22 retaining 73:9,17 125:2 129:8,11 177:18 retention 14:6 37:21 revenue 56:10 157:19 reverse 11:16 review 19:19 25:20 27:16,19 33:10,12 35:16 37:9,20, 21 40:20 41:13 44:1,15 45:6 46:15 47:4 55:18 56:2 75:13 78:7 81:10 82:7,17 89:23 90:14 100:14,17 117:6,12 128:21,23 155:2 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: requests..review 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 219.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 165:18 reviewed 19:15 25:12 29:5,8 134:14 reviewing 24:8 reviews 37:22 revised 105:18,21 106:8 revisions 106:3,4 RFPR 20:22 rise 43:20 44:12 165:4 Robbin 101:21 Robbins 54:22 73:21 75:23 76:4 88:2,13 101:15 102:3 171:17 175:14 180:7 robin 168:19 roderick 80:16 role 11:10 18:3,15 19:22 21:7,22 23:13 25:2,4 33:20 34:8 35:15 37:18 39:9,20 40:2,6 42:9 49:7 50:1 66:18 106:17 116:19,21 117:11 119:12 160:4,11 161:4 176:4 roles 17:18,20 21:5 roof 22:5,13, 18 175:3 room 8:19 9:9 128:20 129:1 Roth 92:19,22 93:14 114:9 122:13 123:8,14, 17 135:15 136:1 137:9 139:6,13 144:5 145:2 Roth's 162:11 roughly 166:16 round 168:19 RSA 18:5,6 38:4 137:11 rule 149:12 rules 7:8 148:15 run 28:6 running 91:7 S SB 176:10,21 177:6 scales 19:5 scathing 144:5 scenario 119:19 scene 14:18 scenes 53:17 school 69:21 70:3,7,9, 10,18 72:4,15, 18,23 73:2 92:14 94:1,10 146:9,10, 12 scope 63:13 105:2,4 106:6 147:22 148:5 160:11 161:18 164:15 170:7 screenshots 173:21 seat 88:22 172:2 second-to- last 69:11 131:3,6 157:23 161:12 175:20 seek 20:22 seeking 21:21 29:20 100:15 select 17:6,7,11 18:13 20:11 22:19 23:2 26:1 28:2,5 30:13 33:1 45:12,15 46:4 49:2,3 51:11 68:1,11 69:2 78:13,16 88:7 89:19 90:4 103:12 126:1 138:6 156:10 176:10, 17,21 selection 21:3 22:17 selectmen 19:14 20:4,7 26:15 27:4,14, 20 29:13, 20 31:5 32:20 33:15,19, 21 34:7 36:3,13 37:1,9,19 38:6 39:9,12, 21 40:4, 18 41:12 42:3,8 43:19 44:13,14 45:2 46:14,19 47:2,18 49:6,12 50:3,22 52:1 55:12 61:21 62:9,15, 16,23 64:19 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: reviewed..selectmen 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 220.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 66:7 73:8,9, 15,16 74:12,22 75:2 76:6 79:3 81:2 86:8,9, 13,22 88:14 89:14,18 90:20 91:3,15 97:8,23 99:10 100:10 102:11 106:17 107:1 109:10 114:18 115:6 116:20 117:10 118:8,13 119:2,6, 8,18,21 120:3,13, 22 126:11,18 127:10,14 128:13 129:8 130:1,11 134:14,20 158:21 163:19 164:20 165:23 176:21 177:14,21 selectmen's 38:8 179:12 Self- contained 16:14 Senator 155:23 send 71:3 78:8 82:16 86:9 133:7 145:7 147:18 150:1,18, 20 151:20 152:12 153:9 155:2,17 158:21,23 159:18 160:21 168:16,18 sending 145:6 151:1 153:1 154:22 155:15 156:8,13 157:12 159:13 162:7,20 163:13 sends 165:20 166:3 sense 24:5 156:4 sentence 61:18,20 131:6,12 132:12,17 158:1 167:3 sentiment 137:16 sentiments 78:12,15 separate 51:22 62:18 76:17 121:5 serve 51:21 served 18:15 99:8 service 16:12,16, 17,21 25:13 services 16:17 17:1 25:3 28:15,21 29:11,18 51:12 52:18 53:10 54:9,18 55:6,11 113:23 121:9 133:10,18 135:5 serving 106:23 107:22 session 38:12 39:1 40:18 41:1,10 62:6,13, 22 95:17 120:4,6, 16,18 sessions 62:18 99:10,21 set 6:20 27:19 31:6 32:4 33:4 61:2 76:12,18 77:3,11 92:22 93:22 94:10 95:12 123:5 134:4 145:2,10, 12,16 161:9,10 173:3 174:13 175:11,16 176:6 sets 62:17,19 setting 18:19 19:4 30:5 31:2,23 35:23 36:15 48:8,11 56:13,19 57:3 58:1 73:10,18 74:14 75:3 77:5 88:15 89:4 90:21 91:4,15, 21 92:1, 6,10,12, 18 94:6 96:4 98:16 99:2 105:11 109:12, 13,18 112:6 114:1,6, 15,22 121:2,10 123:6,21 124:3,19 125:3 129:9 131:22 134:8,10, 16,22,23 136:4,10 145:19 146:4 162:5 177:23 178:13 settle 66:22 settled 65:17 112:9,20 113:3 116:16 settlement 57:7,12, 16,17,18 58:8,21 59:3,5, 10,23 65:20,22 66:1,4,8, 10,12,19, 20 76:23 110:4 112:10, 21,23 settling 67:16 sewer BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: selectmen's..sewer 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 221.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 16:9,18, 21,22,23 shaded 61:16 shaking 8:11 shared 34:11,12 sheet 131:1 154:6 shorthand 6:10 7:12 shoulder 168:5 show 107:2 149:7 showed 171:2 shown 149:1 shows 107:1 sign 27:18 40:20 48:20 49:13 71:9 72:19 73:1 102:15 105:1 117:1 signature 154:6 signatures 82:11 signed 47:13 49:12 54:23 65:19 66:3,4,5, 7,13 71:6,18 72:22 103:10 104:1,4, 10,13 105:8 111:5,17 significanc e 72:11 significant 56:3 158:18 significant ly 74:19 signing 18:19 72:20 103:7,18 117:5 118:10 similar 88:19 157:19 simple 95:5 simply 95:23 single 21:13 44:8 46:7 51:10 138:22 situation 24:23 33:1,3,7 70:17 87:14 112:16 situations 102:18 slang 22:4 slightly 61:16 software 11:8 solely 34:5 67:19 SOPS 89:19 sort 7:7 8:22 14:17,19 19:6 20:18 21:6 35:9 40:21 42:14,15, 22 44:21 71:20 83:21 88:22 110:19 115:16 134:7 143:21 152:11 sorts 8:12 13:23 21:20 35:16 44:16 117:3 170:1 SOUCY 6:7,14, 16,18,20, 22 60:1, 9,12,16 80:17,20, 21 81:17 82:2 116:1,4,5 141:21 148:1,6, 10,12,17, 21 149:1, 10,15,22, 23 154:2, 12 170:9 171:8,11, 12 172:12,19 181:12 sound 116:17 163:9 167:18 speak 26:16 56:15 59:18 88:23 129:13 156:21 speaking 38:4,5 102:22 156:15 158:6 speaks 41:22 160:1 special 15:14,20 16:12 35:5 special- purpose 15:10,21 16:10,11 17:14 121:6 specific 85:6 149:9 154:21 157:10 specificall y 18:5 28:4 30:10 32:14 34:14 40:1 44:6 55:12 66:16 75:5 77:6 82:16 91:6 97:4 128:19 130:7 139:5 151:11 157:13 159:19 167:16 168:23 176:16 speculate 73:19 98:3 spell 6:11 7:1 spend 67:23 68:2 spending 67:3,4 split 173:10 spoke 156:7,14 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: shaded..spoke 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 222.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 158:20 spoken 74:16 156:16 staff 109:3 stage 83:9 161:9 stand 129:19 standard 89:17 90:1,14 standing 74:6 start 20:20 88:6 138:8,9 175:21 started 32:7 57:1 76:20,23 110:4 136:17,22 139:15 140:5 180:2 starting 138:4 starts 61:17 state 6:10,23 12:23 13:18 30:20 94:10 119:5 148:19 161:15 175:2 stated 7:11 9:3, 8 39:2 40:3 42:21 46:22 49:10 50:17 73:2,23 74:23 81:20 86:7 94:17 96:2 98:6 125:5,20 136:6 140:16 150:7 157:23 159:16 171:17 174:14 statement 41:9 73:21 74:6,18, 20 81:21 88:13,18, 19 89:6,8 105:21 107:10 161:8 162:1 167:3 171:19 statements 38:13 106:21 107:13, 19,21 108:4,5 126:7 160:8 states 62:4 76:11 83:11 stating 74:12 status 56:22 57:2,4 statutes 18:1 staunchly 43:16 stay 104:17 stenographe r 7:13 8:3 stenographe r's 7:17 step 42:14 46:21 70:15 152:10 stepped 45:16 stern 45:5 Steve 54:22 73:21 75:23 76:4 77:4 88:2,7,13 89:1 95:2 101:15,21 102:3 171:17 175:14 179:4 180:7,12, 20 sticker 96:16 121:23 153:21 sticks 75:6 stips 6:16 stipulate 60:10 Stipulation s 6:15 stood 46:4 stopping 10:8 strange 97:4 stress 175:2 string 75:10 122:11 studies 11:18 stuff 133:14 subject 63:13 70:1 105:5,23 155:1 submission 79:23 87:8,10 submit 151:9 submits 81:10 submitted 79:17,20, 22 80:2, 5,11,23 82:6,8 87:1 111:8,22 112:1 129:20 submitting 151:4 substance 88:20 149:4 154:10 substantive 126:7 subtracted 106:9 sudden 137:10 suggested 135:17 suggesting 179:15 suit 52:2 sum 157:14 summary 11:15 20:19 30:2 35:18 38:13 81:15 116:13 121:20 130:16 147:23 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: spoken..summary 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 223.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 148:3,15, 16,19 149:12,20 170:7 171:16 172:10,17 181:15 summer 12:9 128:9,11 Sunday 103:12 Sundays 103:18 superbly 9:14 supervision 18:12 supplied 21:9 supplier 26:13 suppliers 27:12 supplies 20:16 24:1 supply 135:11 supplying 23:23 support 94:12 supported 129:3 suppose 149:18 supposed 25:14 56:7 surfaced 110:6 surprised 171:4 surprising 81:17 surrounding 136:20,23 suspend 181:14 suspended 181:19 switching 115:22 sworn 6:3 system 16:23 25:18 150:13 systematica lly 168:14 T table 60:18 tail 110:4 taking 13:8 21:8 49:8 88:15,21 168:11 180:6 talk 7:18 79:7 138:14 140:8 161:22 talked 106:13 145:2 156:1 159:4 179:15 talking 33:2 106:19 112:12 123:6 136:1 142:15,16 155:18 175:21 176:13 tangible 165:12 tax 30:5 31:5,22 32:3 35:23 48:8,11 56:13,19 57:3 58:1 63:11 65:15 76:11,18 77:3,5,11 88:15 91:21 92:9,12, 14 93:22 94:6,8, 10,11 96:4 98:16 99:1,2 105:10 109:12, 13,18 110:16 114:6,15, 19,21,22 121:2,10 123:5,13, 21 124:3, 18 125:3 134:4,8, 10,16,22, 23 136:4, 9 145:3, 10,12,20 146:4 152:1 162:5 175:4,16, 17 176:6 177:7,22 178:13 taxes 63:15,19 64:17 technically 112:15 technology 165:11 telephone 93:16,18 telling 134:20 139:7 tend 8:12 tenure 20:9 term 64:6 terminate 95:6,21, 23 118:14 119:4,23 terminating 117:7,13 118:9,10 126:12 128:16 testified 6:4 65:5 176:2 testimony 14:11,20, 22 15:2 text 74:17 150:11 152:13 172:13 173:8,21 174:2,7, 10,23 175:6,10 178:20 180:3 texting 175:13 texts 178:23 thereto 81:16 thing 8:6 10:5 20:18 21:13,17 22:9 32:11 44:22 77:13 83:21 95:10 135:21 139:14 161:11 179:5 things 8:12 14:1 18:21 19:6,8 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: summer..things 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 224.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 20:1 21:21 22:6,7 28:1,4 35:17 40:21 44:16 52:19,20 53:7,9, 10,13 54:11 59:16 63:10,12, 14 69:22 91:5 95:9 101:19 105:5 106:9 113:15 114:20 117:3 127:20 135:17,21 136:21 143:9 144:14 149:17 157:3 158:18 170:16,18 thinking 9:14 23:23 43:11 thirds 61:14 thorny 53:2 thought 73:20 84:20 95:5 97:4 thoughts 88:6 throw 64:6 Thursday 146:15,18 tied 7:17 48:16,19 81:20 101:4 109:20,22 110:7 time 9:12 10:3,4 11:16 12:11 13:5 35:1,9 36:21 38:6 43:11 45:15,23 55:19 56:3 62:14 64:23 76:5 85:8 90:2 96:1 98:1,13 99:6 103:13 107:1 110:3 115:23 116:12 125:13 126:1 129:5 130:2 143:9,10 145:11, 13,14,23 147:11 164:18 165:3,22 167:20,22 168:8,19 169:5,11, 15,19 170:20 176:15,20 177:13 179:10 180:18 181:5 time- sensitive 97:1 timeline 115:17 146:5 times 24:3 26:3 28:1 78:1 150:19 165:11 title 10:19 11:6 147:13 today 14:12 28:12 40:4 48:5 50:17 56:12 65:5 132:14 133:5 150:7 told 85:7 164:6 167:16 181:9 tone 138:12 144:13,16 145:4,8 top 62:4,10 69:1 122:7 154:4,8 175:5 topic 43:13 topics 174:4 total 11:12 157:15 town 10:13,14, 23 14:23 15:8,16, 21,22,23 16:3,5,22 17:3,4,5, 6,8,12, 13,17,21 18:3,7,9, 12,15,16, 17,21 19:11,15, 22 20:7, 9,10,14, 15,17,18 21:7,9, 11,17 22:2,3,8, 22 23:5, 12,13,14, 17 24:6,7 25:1,4,8, 23 26:12, 14,16,17 27:8,11, 13,15,17, 18 28:13 29:12,19 31:1,5, 16,19 32:1,8, 13,16,17, 19 33:15, 19 35:14, 17,21 36:3 37:7,23 43:9 45:11 46:6,23 47:10,13 48:10,15, 17 49:20, 23 50:1 51:13,23 52:19 53:4,12, 20 54:10, 16,19 55:12 56:13,22, 23 58:15, 19 59:12, 17 60:6, 13 62:9 64:2,8, 15,22 65:15 66:3,8, 13,22 67:12,18, 23 68:3, 17,19 69:6 70:6,19 71:4,9 72:7,8,21 76:15,19 77:7,17, 21 79:7, 20,22 80:2,10, 12,23 81:9 82:6,8, 13,16 83:2,3 84:1,8, BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: thinking..town 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 225.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 12,16 85:18,22, 23 86:2, 3,10,16, 23 87:11 88:21 89:16 90:3,5 91:11 92:3 96:3 97:10 99:17 101:1 102:15,23 103:2,10, 19 104:9, 10,13,14, 20 105:20 106:14,22 107:3,15, 22 108:10 109:7,11, 21 110:3, 11,14,21 111:9,10 113:18, 20,23 116:11,19 117:8 118:1,6, 7,10,14, 16,23 119:7,11, 19,23 121:3,7, 8,12,15 124:2,12, 23 126:13 127:16 129:19,21 130:8 131:15 133:12, 15,19,21 134:1,4 135:7,11, 18 136:9, 11,12 138:18 139:4,11, 20 140:2, 11,20 141:12 142:17 143:6,22 144:7 148:6 150:8,9, 10,11 156:12 158:4,5, 7,10 159:2 160:5,12 161:4,5, 18,20,21 164:22 166:3,18 167:15 168:15,16 169:3,8 171:20 173:17 176:4 town's 68:9,16 86:5 94:8,11 114:21 121:20 123:13 130:16 171:16 towns 67:14 83:1 137:23 160:22 161:3 training 13:6,8 transcend 16:15 transcribed 7:21 8:7 transcript 9:3 transfer 40:7 42:13 transferrin g 42:12 transmitted 150:17 transparent 68:14 Transportat ion 11:4,13 treat 138:8 treatment 16:22 trouble 177:10 true 54:6 106:10 150:14,15 Tucker 28:16,21 Tuesday 123:3 175:16 two-page 60:18 122:3 154:13 type 119:17,20 176:1 typed 6:9 154:7 types 22:6 24:5 142:21 165:11 169:21 typical 59:11 typically 19:7 21:6 35:13,15 62:10,11 120:17 143:12 U uh-huh 10:2 27:3 61:3 111:6 123:7 129:18 150:6 175:19 uh-uh 61:6 ultimate 88:8 ultimately 100:13 153:10 uncommon 9:12 106:8 understand 9:10,15, 18 28:17 30:1 33:5,6 36:9 39:7 40:3 42:7,23 49:5 50:11 52:7 70:16 91:8 98:9 99:18 123:16 135:3 160:17 161:14 168:4 understandi ng 17:20 30:3,6, 10,14,16, 23 33:18 34:2 36:12,18 37:7,15, 17,22,23 39:8,18 41:8,11, 15,16 42:7,17 50:2,18 53:18 54:7 55:20 58:19 63:6,9 64:12,18 65:6 70:23 73:7,15 86:5 95:2,3 97:7,14 98:7,8 101:11 104:5 112:4 113:15 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: town's..understanding 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 226.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 116:20 117:1 121:1 129:11 135:3,5 152:11 156:5 177:13 178:11, 12,14 179:11,12 understood 10:1 39:2 71:13 95:8 108:15 168:10 170:3 University 11:18,20 unnecessary 145:5,8 unpack 91:12 168:1 unpaid 129:22 unsealed 38:22 unusual 106:2 updates 20:3,6 usual 6:16 utility 98:20 99:8 V valid 87:2 variety 95:3,9 157:3 vehicle 64:9,15, 16,21 vendor 20:23 23:23 26:13 vendors 20:16 21:8 27:12 vent 125:17 verbal 8:9 verbatim 6:10 8:7 83:10 verificatio n 26:4 verified 25:12 verifies 82:11 verify 174:22 verifying 26:5,6,7, 21 Vermont 11:4,13, 17 vice 76:8 87:3 video- recorded 8:7 Village 15:13 16:21 34:18 35:4 36:6 54:1,11, 22 57:11 59:13 101:23 103:8 114:4,8, 14 124:6 visit 156:23 vital 165:3 vitally 164:21 volume 154:10 vote 42:4,6 83:23 85:18 89:8 171:20 177:8,15 178:15 voted 40:5 66:23 72:18 119:14,21 171:18,21 177:6,21 voters 82:12 141:15 154:5 voting 177:14 W wages 18:19 wait 8:2 waive 37:10 41:13 44:1,15 45:7 46:16 47:4 91:9 117:2 179:21 waived 51:15 waiver 31:22 32:5 71:4,9, 11,15,17 72:16 96:1 179:20 waivers 37:22 40:20 walk 8:18 42:1 wanted 28:3 40:1 44:8,9 49:2,4 52:3 70:12,22 98:10,13 118:13 127:2 134:21 135:17 164:2 172:15 177:17 wanting 49:21 86:22 100:23 168:12 Warmington 125:19 133:8 179:14 warned 34:5 89:22 119:13 120:2,5 141:12 177:9,19 181:4 warrant 78:7,8,13 79:15 80:1,22 81:10 82:5,8 83:11 84:5,22 85:21 87:15 110:8 111:8,22 112:2 141:3 142:9,18 143:3 148:5 150:9 152:13,18 155:1 157:17 160:19 163:6 166:6 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: understood..warrant 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 227.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com 167:1 watching 138:3 water 16:9,10, 12 ways 133:23 136:10 139:19 140:11 151:3 web 90:4 website 68:9,16 83:4,8 90:4 week 19:23 141:1 145:18,22 164:11 169:10 170:14 weeks 92:12 weird 139:14 181:5 Western 11:19 whichever 159:6 whip 162:14 Williams 101:22 165:21,22 win 172:2,3 winter 12:3 witnessed 102:12 wondering 34:23 Woodsum 32:3 69:12,18 70:9,18 71:3,19 72:16,21 92:4,5,9, 17 93:14 94:15 95:23 96:11,12, 20,21 97:1 121:8,16 123:10, 16,18 124:1,4, 9,13 126:4,15, 19,23 134:2 135:14, 19,20 136:15 155:19 156:4 158:13 175:22 176:3 Woodsum's 159:8 Woodsville 15:13 16:21 30:12 33:17 34:16,17, 18 35:4,5 36:6 37:3,12 38:17 39:11,17 40:23 41:15 42:11 46:3,9,17 47:8,21 48:7,15, 20 49:9, 11 50:4, 7,22 51:3,19 52:10 53:21,23 54:11 56:16 57:11 58:17,22 59:13 62:2 63:4,12 64:3,7,9, 14,15,22 65:2,9, 11,12,14, 16 66:9 67:13 68:5 76:15 77:7 101:7,8, 23 102:4, 5,6,9,14, 19,20,22 103:8,12, 21 106:11,20 109:14,21 110:20 111:9 112:3,8 113:19 114:3,8, 14,20 115:1,11 116:11, 15,17,23 117:11 124:5,6 142:10,15 143:4,6 160:8,23 163:2 Woodsville' s 56:22 110:10,15 Woodsville- related 69:15 132:4 word 26:3 41:23 45:4 83:10,12 127:3 134:2 worded 9:13 83:18 145:1 167:18 176:2,5 words 45:17 107:14 work 10:13 11:3 19:21 20:17 22:11 23:7,10 24:3,8,21 25:3 29:12,18 30:15 32:7 52:17 53:11 54:17 93:9 103:1 106:14 107:3,8 113:22 118:19 124:17 132:16, 18,22 133:1,10, 17 134:16, 21,22 135:6 138:20 139:21 151:23 173:17, 18,19 worked 11:4 17:5 21:10 31:4 44:20 99:6 155:23 working 22:14,15 31:16,19 32:2 91:18,23 92:2,3,8, 11,19 99:2 109:13 113:17 123:17 126:3 132:23 135:14 136:9 158:12,14 181:5 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: watching..working 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com
  • 228.
    BRIGITTE CODLING Town ofHaverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com works 17:6,7 102:6 workshop 23:3 169:9 write 144:20 145:1 177:12 181:8 writes 88:7 writing 43:1,4 82:4 180:17 181:2 written 81:6 93:8 94:15 144:16,18 159:8 168:3 wrong 77:17 wrote 116:14 161:13 Y year 10:17 11:11 12:1,2 23:6 24:2,3 77:22 89:16 128:6 156:12 171:3 years 11:5,12, 13 40:13 84:16 162:13 yesterday 170:13 yup 6:18,20 8:5 34:22 44:23 76:13 79:12 81:5 82:10 120:5 125:13 147:4,7 148:21 151:6 155:10 175:23 BRIGITTE CODLING Town of Haverhill vs Donahue Tucker & Ciandella May 20, 2024 Index: works..yup 800.211.DEPO (3376) EsquireSolutions.com