SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Indian evidence Act, 1872
By- Shri Biswaranjan Rout, OSPS-II
Asst. Public Prosecutor
Bhubaneswar
11 chapters, Section 167, Parts 03
Procedural / adjective law
Particular subject – special law
Applicable to both civil and criminal – sec.23 & 105.
Ubi jus ibl remedium – where there is right there is remedy.
Civil – A & B entered into a contract. A sues B for breach of contract. A has
to prove there is a contract between them. And B has violated the contract.
Criminal – A is prosecuted for the murder of B. So prosecution has to prove
that A killed B. And A had intention to kill B.
Purpose – proving & disproving of facts.
– What / How / Who
Fact
Falsus in uno falsus in omnibus – False in onething, false in everything
– has no appli
– A witness can’t be branded as liar
 Fact in issue – Breach of contract / A killed B with spear.
 Criminal – Allegation in the charge sheet
– Assertion by one and denial by other
– Prosecution to prove – Beyond all reasonable doubts
 Civil – Plaintiff to prove – Pre-ponderance of probability
 Three stop journey – investigation / inquiry – trial – judgment
 Relevant facts – any of the ways
– whether fii exists / does not exist
– indirect / circumstantial
– tools to prove / disprove
SECTION – 4
 Presumption
I. Meaning
II. Kinds
a) Presumption of fact
b) Presumption of law
i. Rebuttable of presumption
ii. Ir-rebuttable of presumption
c) Mixed presumption of fact & law
EVIDENCE (SEC.3)
 Evidence
a) Oral
b) Documentary
 Oral – Expressed / spoken by mouth / facts under inquiry (r/f)
i. Sec.3
ii. Sec.59 – All facts – except
– contents of documents / e.r.
iii. Sec.60 – O.E. must be direct – percieved through senses
– rule of best evidence – first hand
– rule of exclusion of hearsay evidence
Proviso – opinion of experts – absence – treaty
– material thing – fact in issue / relevant fact – production
 Evidence obtained by undesirable methods – Case law
 Hearsay (Sec.60) – excludes H.S. / indirect evidence
– does not give statement best upon his own
knowledge of another.
HEARSAY (SEC.60)
A murders B, C witness gives a statement that, C has seen the murder / killing
of B by A.
Not upon his own knowledge
Upon the knowledge of others
Indirect / hearsay evidence
Reasons – People’s memory are fragile & short – truth will be dilected /
diminished with each repetition.
– Person giving statement does not have any responsibility.
– Lacks truthfulness / accuracy / not delivered on oath / cannot be
tested by cross examination.
– Second hand evidence / exaggeration / fabrication.
– Litigations are likely to be prolonged.
Exception –
1. Res gestae – sec.6
2. Admissions & confession – Sec.17 to 23, 31, 24 to 30.
3. Statements relevant U/s 32.
4. Sec.34 / 35.
5. Sec.60 – Experts in treaties.
6. Sec.74
Relevant & Admissible – Matter of legal policy / legal fori
– Facts may be relevant but not admissible.
– But in order to admissible a fact must be relevant.
PRESUMPTION
 An inference of a fact drawn from other known / proved facts
 Rule of law
 Fact – 1 – proved – fact – 2 – presumed on fact 1
KINDS
Presumption of fact – May presume
– Provided / Natural presumption
– Discretion of the court / rebuttable
– Regard as proved negativated by a contrary proof
– May call proof for it.
e.g. Sec.86 to 88, 90 / 90-A / 113 / 113-A / 114.
 Presumption of law – Rebuttable P.O.L – shall presume
– Irrebuttable P.O.L – conclusive proof
R.P.O.L – SHALL PRESUME
– Directed by this act – Legislative intent.
– Obligatory / Court has no option but is bound mandatory to take the
fact as proved.
– Opposite party – Successful – disproving then the court shall not
presume the fact.
Example – Sec.79 to 85 / 89 / 111-A / 113-B
– Accuracy of maps / plans made by the Govt. authority
CONCLUSIVE PROOF – Irrebuttable P.O.L – Declared by this Act / no discretion
at all.
– On proof of one fact, regard the others as proved.
– Not to entertain to adduce evidence on it.
Example – Sec.41 / 112 / 113
– Sec.82 IPC
– Sec.115 to 117 estoppel
Sec.112 – It is always to be presumed that children are legitimate.
– Maternity is a fact but paternity is an matter of inferences.
– Rule for the proof of maternity.
Deciding factor – Point of time of birth of child.
– had access to the mother.
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – SEC.61 TO 90
A witness may lie but a document shall not.
Witness – Living proof
Document – dead proof
– Superior to oral evidence and in many respects, in
trustworthiness.
Proof of document – Proved by the author or by any other evidence.
Sec.61 – Sec.62
Sec.64 – Best Evidence – Primary – in case of D.E.
Sec.62 – e.g. – A sale dead was executed between “A” & “B”.
Thank you

More Related Content

Similar to EVIDENCE - CLASS-1sections preliminary - BY B.R.ROUT-2.pptx

Ca hc kegalle_06_2012
Ca hc kegalle_06_2012Ca hc kegalle_06_2012
Ca hc kegalle_06_2012
awasalam
 
Evidence Act notes@lawforcivilservices.pdf
Evidence Act notes@lawforcivilservices.pdfEvidence Act notes@lawforcivilservices.pdf
Evidence Act notes@lawforcivilservices.pdf
SSIr2
 
PRESUMPTIONS UNDER THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872.pptx
PRESUMPTIONS UNDER THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872.pptxPRESUMPTIONS UNDER THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872.pptx
PRESUMPTIONS UNDER THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872.pptx
isha423717
 
Narayan ganesh dastane_vs_sucheta_narayan_dastane_on_19_march,_1975
Narayan ganesh dastane_vs_sucheta_narayan_dastane_on_19_march,_1975Narayan ganesh dastane_vs_sucheta_narayan_dastane_on_19_march,_1975
Narayan ganesh dastane_vs_sucheta_narayan_dastane_on_19_march,_1975
apurvadesai01
 
IPC-1st class INTRO- BY BR ROUT-PPT.pptx
IPC-1st class INTRO- BY BR ROUT-PPT.pptxIPC-1st class INTRO- BY BR ROUT-PPT.pptx
IPC-1st class INTRO- BY BR ROUT-PPT.pptx
BiswaranjanRout19
 

Similar to EVIDENCE - CLASS-1sections preliminary - BY B.R.ROUT-2.pptx (20)

Ca hc kegalle_06_2012
Ca hc kegalle_06_2012Ca hc kegalle_06_2012
Ca hc kegalle_06_2012
 
Evidence Act notes@lawforcivilservices.pdf
Evidence Act notes@lawforcivilservices.pdfEvidence Act notes@lawforcivilservices.pdf
Evidence Act notes@lawforcivilservices.pdf
 
evidence notes.pdf
evidence notes.pdfevidence notes.pdf
evidence notes.pdf
 
(2) hearsay evidence
(2) hearsay evidence(2) hearsay evidence
(2) hearsay evidence
 
Legal
LegalLegal
Legal
 
249787546-PowerPoint-Presentation-Criminal-Evidence.ppt
249787546-PowerPoint-Presentation-Criminal-Evidence.ppt249787546-PowerPoint-Presentation-Criminal-Evidence.ppt
249787546-PowerPoint-Presentation-Criminal-Evidence.ppt
 
EVIDENCE POWERPOINT LECTURE REVIEWER FOR LAW STUDES
EVIDENCE POWERPOINT LECTURE REVIEWER FOR LAW STUDESEVIDENCE POWERPOINT LECTURE REVIEWER FOR LAW STUDES
EVIDENCE POWERPOINT LECTURE REVIEWER FOR LAW STUDES
 
BURDEN OF PROOF PPT and it's shifting onus
BURDEN OF PROOF PPT and it's shifting onusBURDEN OF PROOF PPT and it's shifting onus
BURDEN OF PROOF PPT and it's shifting onus
 
PRESUMPTION AND JUDICIAL NOTICE
PRESUMPTION AND JUDICIAL NOTICEPRESUMPTION AND JUDICIAL NOTICE
PRESUMPTION AND JUDICIAL NOTICE
 
Useful article on evidence act
Useful article on evidence actUseful article on evidence act
Useful article on evidence act
 
Rule-131-Burden-of-Proof-and-Presumptions.pptx
Rule-131-Burden-of-Proof-and-Presumptions.pptxRule-131-Burden-of-Proof-and-Presumptions.pptx
Rule-131-Burden-of-Proof-and-Presumptions.pptx
 
LAST-MINUTE-IN-CRIMINAL-JURISPRUDENCE.pptx
LAST-MINUTE-IN-CRIMINAL-JURISPRUDENCE.pptxLAST-MINUTE-IN-CRIMINAL-JURISPRUDENCE.pptx
LAST-MINUTE-IN-CRIMINAL-JURISPRUDENCE.pptx
 
Law of evidence
Law of evidenceLaw of evidence
Law of evidence
 
Part 3 (2)
Part 3 (2)Part 3 (2)
Part 3 (2)
 
Witness privilege against compelled production of documents and testimonial s...
Witness privilege against compelled production of documents and testimonial s...Witness privilege against compelled production of documents and testimonial s...
Witness privilege against compelled production of documents and testimonial s...
 
Arulpragasan V Pp
Arulpragasan V PpArulpragasan V Pp
Arulpragasan V Pp
 
Evidence
EvidenceEvidence
Evidence
 
PRESUMPTIONS UNDER THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872.pptx
PRESUMPTIONS UNDER THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872.pptxPRESUMPTIONS UNDER THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872.pptx
PRESUMPTIONS UNDER THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872.pptx
 
Narayan ganesh dastane_vs_sucheta_narayan_dastane_on_19_march,_1975
Narayan ganesh dastane_vs_sucheta_narayan_dastane_on_19_march,_1975Narayan ganesh dastane_vs_sucheta_narayan_dastane_on_19_march,_1975
Narayan ganesh dastane_vs_sucheta_narayan_dastane_on_19_march,_1975
 
IPC-1st class INTRO- BY BR ROUT-PPT.pptx
IPC-1st class INTRO- BY BR ROUT-PPT.pptxIPC-1st class INTRO- BY BR ROUT-PPT.pptx
IPC-1st class INTRO- BY BR ROUT-PPT.pptx
 

More from BiswaranjanRout19

More from BiswaranjanRout19 (9)

RIGHT TO FAIR TRIALwdgfkljklhkjhghjghj.pptx
RIGHT TO FAIR TRIALwdgfkljklhkjhghjghj.pptxRIGHT TO FAIR TRIALwdgfkljklhkjhghjghj.pptx
RIGHT TO FAIR TRIALwdgfkljklhkjhghjghj.pptx
 
IPC-1 to 4 (1)FGHJKDSDFGHKFGHJKJGFDFGHJK.pptx
IPC-1 to 4 (1)FGHJKDSDFGHKFGHJKJGFDFGHJK.pptxIPC-1 to 4 (1)FGHJKDSDFGHKFGHJKJGFDFGHJK.pptx
IPC-1 to 4 (1)FGHJKDSDFGHKFGHJKJGFDFGHJK.pptx
 
IPC-GCaesdfdxgfhgfghgfghjhgffghjkljhg.pptx
IPC-GCaesdfdxgfhgfghgfghjhgffghjkljhg.pptxIPC-GCaesdfdxgfhgfghgfghjhgffghjkljhg.pptx
IPC-GCaesdfdxgfhgfghgfghjhgffghjkljhg.pptx
 
THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 INTRODUCTION
THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 INTRODUCTIONTHE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 INTRODUCTION
THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 INTRODUCTION
 
12345678765454332IPC-by Shri BR Rout.pptx
12345678765454332IPC-by Shri BR Rout.pptx12345678765454332IPC-by Shri BR Rout.pptx
12345678765454332IPC-by Shri BR Rout.pptx
 
P.C. & PNDT Act-by Shri BR RoutBBSR.pptx
P.C. & PNDT Act-by Shri BR RoutBBSR.pptxP.C. & PNDT Act-by Shri BR RoutBBSR.pptx
P.C. & PNDT Act-by Shri BR RoutBBSR.pptx
 
criminallaw 1860123456778765476-PPT.pptx
criminallaw 1860123456778765476-PPT.pptxcriminallaw 1860123456778765476-PPT.pptx
criminallaw 1860123456778765476-PPT.pptx
 
lawofevidence Act1872 section 5to55.pptx
lawofevidence Act1872 section 5to55.pptxlawofevidence Act1872 section 5to55.pptx
lawofevidence Act1872 section 5to55.pptx
 
FAIR TRIAL & CHILD FRIENDLY PROCEDURES BY H.K. SWAIN.pptx
FAIR TRIAL & CHILD FRIENDLY PROCEDURES BY H.K. SWAIN.pptxFAIR TRIAL & CHILD FRIENDLY PROCEDURES BY H.K. SWAIN.pptx
FAIR TRIAL & CHILD FRIENDLY PROCEDURES BY H.K. SWAIN.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptxPowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
ca2or2tx
 
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptxCOPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
RRR Chambers
 
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfAppeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
PoojaGadiya1
 
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
 
Police Misconduct Lawyers - Law Office of Jerry L. Steering
Police Misconduct Lawyers - Law Office of Jerry L. SteeringPolice Misconduct Lawyers - Law Office of Jerry L. Steering
Police Misconduct Lawyers - Law Office of Jerry L. Steering
 
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版赫尔大学毕业证如何办理
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
 
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)
 
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxMOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
 
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
 
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxPPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
 
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptxPowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
 
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptxCOPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
 
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfAppeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
 
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
 
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdfRelationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
 
Clarifying Land Donation Issues Memo for
Clarifying Land Donation Issues Memo forClarifying Land Donation Issues Memo for
Clarifying Land Donation Issues Memo for
 
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentationPerformance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
 
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction FailsCAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
 
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptxMunicipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
 
$ Love Spells^ 💎 (310) 882-6330 in Utah, UT | Psychic Reading Best Black Magi...
$ Love Spells^ 💎 (310) 882-6330 in Utah, UT | Psychic Reading Best Black Magi...$ Love Spells^ 💎 (310) 882-6330 in Utah, UT | Psychic Reading Best Black Magi...
$ Love Spells^ 💎 (310) 882-6330 in Utah, UT | Psychic Reading Best Black Magi...
 
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
 

EVIDENCE - CLASS-1sections preliminary - BY B.R.ROUT-2.pptx

  • 1. Indian evidence Act, 1872 By- Shri Biswaranjan Rout, OSPS-II Asst. Public Prosecutor Bhubaneswar
  • 2. 11 chapters, Section 167, Parts 03 Procedural / adjective law Particular subject – special law Applicable to both civil and criminal – sec.23 & 105. Ubi jus ibl remedium – where there is right there is remedy. Civil – A & B entered into a contract. A sues B for breach of contract. A has to prove there is a contract between them. And B has violated the contract. Criminal – A is prosecuted for the murder of B. So prosecution has to prove that A killed B. And A had intention to kill B. Purpose – proving & disproving of facts. – What / How / Who Fact Falsus in uno falsus in omnibus – False in onething, false in everything – has no appli – A witness can’t be branded as liar
  • 3.  Fact in issue – Breach of contract / A killed B with spear.  Criminal – Allegation in the charge sheet – Assertion by one and denial by other – Prosecution to prove – Beyond all reasonable doubts  Civil – Plaintiff to prove – Pre-ponderance of probability  Three stop journey – investigation / inquiry – trial – judgment  Relevant facts – any of the ways – whether fii exists / does not exist – indirect / circumstantial – tools to prove / disprove
  • 4. SECTION – 4  Presumption I. Meaning II. Kinds a) Presumption of fact b) Presumption of law i. Rebuttable of presumption ii. Ir-rebuttable of presumption c) Mixed presumption of fact & law
  • 5. EVIDENCE (SEC.3)  Evidence a) Oral b) Documentary  Oral – Expressed / spoken by mouth / facts under inquiry (r/f) i. Sec.3 ii. Sec.59 – All facts – except – contents of documents / e.r. iii. Sec.60 – O.E. must be direct – percieved through senses – rule of best evidence – first hand – rule of exclusion of hearsay evidence Proviso – opinion of experts – absence – treaty – material thing – fact in issue / relevant fact – production  Evidence obtained by undesirable methods – Case law  Hearsay (Sec.60) – excludes H.S. / indirect evidence – does not give statement best upon his own knowledge of another.
  • 6. HEARSAY (SEC.60) A murders B, C witness gives a statement that, C has seen the murder / killing of B by A. Not upon his own knowledge Upon the knowledge of others Indirect / hearsay evidence Reasons – People’s memory are fragile & short – truth will be dilected / diminished with each repetition. – Person giving statement does not have any responsibility. – Lacks truthfulness / accuracy / not delivered on oath / cannot be tested by cross examination. – Second hand evidence / exaggeration / fabrication. – Litigations are likely to be prolonged.
  • 7. Exception – 1. Res gestae – sec.6 2. Admissions & confession – Sec.17 to 23, 31, 24 to 30. 3. Statements relevant U/s 32. 4. Sec.34 / 35. 5. Sec.60 – Experts in treaties. 6. Sec.74 Relevant & Admissible – Matter of legal policy / legal fori – Facts may be relevant but not admissible. – But in order to admissible a fact must be relevant.
  • 8. PRESUMPTION  An inference of a fact drawn from other known / proved facts  Rule of law  Fact – 1 – proved – fact – 2 – presumed on fact 1 KINDS Presumption of fact – May presume – Provided / Natural presumption – Discretion of the court / rebuttable – Regard as proved negativated by a contrary proof – May call proof for it. e.g. Sec.86 to 88, 90 / 90-A / 113 / 113-A / 114.  Presumption of law – Rebuttable P.O.L – shall presume – Irrebuttable P.O.L – conclusive proof
  • 9. R.P.O.L – SHALL PRESUME – Directed by this act – Legislative intent. – Obligatory / Court has no option but is bound mandatory to take the fact as proved. – Opposite party – Successful – disproving then the court shall not presume the fact. Example – Sec.79 to 85 / 89 / 111-A / 113-B – Accuracy of maps / plans made by the Govt. authority CONCLUSIVE PROOF – Irrebuttable P.O.L – Declared by this Act / no discretion at all. – On proof of one fact, regard the others as proved. – Not to entertain to adduce evidence on it. Example – Sec.41 / 112 / 113 – Sec.82 IPC – Sec.115 to 117 estoppel
  • 10. Sec.112 – It is always to be presumed that children are legitimate. – Maternity is a fact but paternity is an matter of inferences. – Rule for the proof of maternity. Deciding factor – Point of time of birth of child. – had access to the mother. DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE – SEC.61 TO 90 A witness may lie but a document shall not. Witness – Living proof Document – dead proof – Superior to oral evidence and in many respects, in trustworthiness. Proof of document – Proved by the author or by any other evidence. Sec.61 – Sec.62 Sec.64 – Best Evidence – Primary – in case of D.E. Sec.62 – e.g. – A sale dead was executed between “A” & “B”.