Slides from Pure Employment Law's update seminar on 5 June 2014 aimed at HR professionals, managers and business owners. Covering updates on human resources, law reform, TUPE, whistleblowing, flexible working, Employment Tribunals, case law, ACAS pre-claim conciliation and more!
This document provides an annual employment law update covering topics such as TUPE, collective redundancies, working time regulations, contracts of employment, privacy in the workplace, social media, whistleblowing, discrimination, the Modern Slavery Act 2015, apprenticeships, and tribunal fee updates. Key cases from 2015 are summarized relating to these various employment law topics. Employers are advised to review policies and employment practices in light of the legal developments discussed.
1) The document provides an update on recent changes to UK employment law and proposed reforms currently under consultation.
2) It summarizes the status of 15 proposed reforms to employment tribunals, including increasing fees to commence claims and reducing the minimum consultation period for collective redundancies.
3) The case law update summarizes recent rulings on topics like redundancy selection criteria, social media postings, TUPE transfers, discrimination based on marital status, and the justification of age discrimination in the Seldon v Clarkson retirement case.
These seminars are aimed at anyone who deals with employment law on a day to day basis, including HR managers and HR directors.
At these events we present an overview of what we consider to be the most significant cases decided in 2015, and what they teach us about managing your workforce - together with our practical tips.
We also talk about what is coming up in 2016, and how you can get ready for what will be another busy year in employment law.
We will be covering the following topics:
• working time/travel time
• social media update
• discrimination and whistleblowing update
• Modern Slavery Act
• privacy in the workplace
• the latest on tribunal fees
• what's coming up in 2016.
https://www.brownejacobson.com/sectors-and-services/services/employment
These seminars are aimed at anyone who deals with employment law on a day to day basis, including HR managers and HR directors.
At these events we present an overview of what we consider to be the most significant cases decided in 2015, and what they teach us about managing your workforce - together with our practical tips.
We also talk about what is coming up in 2016, and how you can get ready for what will be another busy year in employment law.
We will be covering the following topics:
• working time/travel time
• social media update
• discrimination and whistleblowing update
• Modern Slavery Act
• privacy in the workplace
• the latest on tribunal fees
• what's coming up in 2016.
https://www.brownejacobson.com/sectors-and-services/services/employment
This document provides a summary of an annual employment law update session held in January 2016 in Nottingham. It covered numerous topics including: TUPE, collective redundancies, working time regulations, changing employment contracts, the right to be accompanied, the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015, parental leave, privacy in the workplace, social media, whistleblowing, discrimination, apprenticeships, and tribunal fees. Key cases from 2015 relating to these topics are also summarized.
Paris Smith LLP - Employment law update 2013ParisSmithLLP
This document summarizes an employment law conference that took place on October 2, 2013. The conference covered changes in employment legislation presented by Clive Dobbin and updates to case law presented by David Roath, both partners at Paris Smith LLP. Key legislative changes included reforms to employment tribunals including new fees, increases to the unfair dismissal compensation cap, and the introduction of employee shareholders. Case law updates addressed issues such as when a dismissal for gross misconduct can still be considered unfair, the use of covert video surveillance in dismissals, and determining suitable alternative employment in redundancy situations. The conference provided an overview of significant employment law developments in 2013.
These seminars are aimed at anyone who deals with employment law on a day to day basis, including HR managers and HR directors.
At these events we present an overview of what we consider to be the most significant cases decided in 2015, and what they teach us about managing your workforce - together with our practical tips.
We also talk about what is coming up in 2016, and how you can get ready for what will be another busy year in employment law.
We will be covering the following topics:
• working time/travel time
• social media update
• discrimination and whistleblowing update
• Modern Slavery Act
• privacy in the workplace
• the latest on tribunal fees
• what's coming up in 2016.
https://www.brownejacobson.com/sectors-and-services/services/employment
The document summarizes an HR seminar that covered several employment law topics, including the upcoming UK general election, shared parental leave, holiday pay, and obesity as a potential disability. Key points included indications that the Conservatives may introduce significant changes to union rules and replace the Human Rights Act, while Labour may increase statutory paternity leave and the minimum wage. Regarding shared parental leave, mothers must end maternity leave for fathers to take leave, which can be shared in blocks between the child's first and second birthdays. Recent court cases established that holiday pay calculations should include non-guaranteed overtime to comply with EU law. Lastly, the European Court of Justice ruled that obesity could constitute a disability if it hinders
This document provides an annual employment law update covering topics such as TUPE, collective redundancies, working time regulations, contracts of employment, privacy in the workplace, social media, whistleblowing, discrimination, the Modern Slavery Act 2015, apprenticeships, and tribunal fee updates. Key cases from 2015 are summarized relating to these various employment law topics. Employers are advised to review policies and employment practices in light of the legal developments discussed.
1) The document provides an update on recent changes to UK employment law and proposed reforms currently under consultation.
2) It summarizes the status of 15 proposed reforms to employment tribunals, including increasing fees to commence claims and reducing the minimum consultation period for collective redundancies.
3) The case law update summarizes recent rulings on topics like redundancy selection criteria, social media postings, TUPE transfers, discrimination based on marital status, and the justification of age discrimination in the Seldon v Clarkson retirement case.
These seminars are aimed at anyone who deals with employment law on a day to day basis, including HR managers and HR directors.
At these events we present an overview of what we consider to be the most significant cases decided in 2015, and what they teach us about managing your workforce - together with our practical tips.
We also talk about what is coming up in 2016, and how you can get ready for what will be another busy year in employment law.
We will be covering the following topics:
• working time/travel time
• social media update
• discrimination and whistleblowing update
• Modern Slavery Act
• privacy in the workplace
• the latest on tribunal fees
• what's coming up in 2016.
https://www.brownejacobson.com/sectors-and-services/services/employment
These seminars are aimed at anyone who deals with employment law on a day to day basis, including HR managers and HR directors.
At these events we present an overview of what we consider to be the most significant cases decided in 2015, and what they teach us about managing your workforce - together with our practical tips.
We also talk about what is coming up in 2016, and how you can get ready for what will be another busy year in employment law.
We will be covering the following topics:
• working time/travel time
• social media update
• discrimination and whistleblowing update
• Modern Slavery Act
• privacy in the workplace
• the latest on tribunal fees
• what's coming up in 2016.
https://www.brownejacobson.com/sectors-and-services/services/employment
This document provides a summary of an annual employment law update session held in January 2016 in Nottingham. It covered numerous topics including: TUPE, collective redundancies, working time regulations, changing employment contracts, the right to be accompanied, the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015, parental leave, privacy in the workplace, social media, whistleblowing, discrimination, apprenticeships, and tribunal fees. Key cases from 2015 relating to these topics are also summarized.
Paris Smith LLP - Employment law update 2013ParisSmithLLP
This document summarizes an employment law conference that took place on October 2, 2013. The conference covered changes in employment legislation presented by Clive Dobbin and updates to case law presented by David Roath, both partners at Paris Smith LLP. Key legislative changes included reforms to employment tribunals including new fees, increases to the unfair dismissal compensation cap, and the introduction of employee shareholders. Case law updates addressed issues such as when a dismissal for gross misconduct can still be considered unfair, the use of covert video surveillance in dismissals, and determining suitable alternative employment in redundancy situations. The conference provided an overview of significant employment law developments in 2013.
These seminars are aimed at anyone who deals with employment law on a day to day basis, including HR managers and HR directors.
At these events we present an overview of what we consider to be the most significant cases decided in 2015, and what they teach us about managing your workforce - together with our practical tips.
We also talk about what is coming up in 2016, and how you can get ready for what will be another busy year in employment law.
We will be covering the following topics:
• working time/travel time
• social media update
• discrimination and whistleblowing update
• Modern Slavery Act
• privacy in the workplace
• the latest on tribunal fees
• what's coming up in 2016.
https://www.brownejacobson.com/sectors-and-services/services/employment
The document summarizes an HR seminar that covered several employment law topics, including the upcoming UK general election, shared parental leave, holiday pay, and obesity as a potential disability. Key points included indications that the Conservatives may introduce significant changes to union rules and replace the Human Rights Act, while Labour may increase statutory paternity leave and the minimum wage. Regarding shared parental leave, mothers must end maternity leave for fathers to take leave, which can be shared in blocks between the child's first and second birthdays. Recent court cases established that holiday pay calculations should include non-guaranteed overtime to comply with EU law. Lastly, the European Court of Justice ruled that obesity could constitute a disability if it hinders
Yolk Recruitment - HR Insights Presentation, Employment Law UpdateYolk Recruitment
The document summarizes employment law reforms that are already in effect, imminent, and likely in the future in the UK. Reforms that are already in effect include increasing the qualifying service period for unfair dismissal claims to 2 years, reducing collective redundancy minimum consultation periods, and expanding whistleblower protections. Upcoming reforms include implementing employment tribunal fees, updating tribunal rules, changing compensation for unfair dismissal, and allowing pre-termination settlement agreements. Potential future reforms address changing the Equality Act, mandating early conciliation, permitting financial penalties for employers, expanding flexible working rights, and reforming fit notes and shared parental leave.
The document summarizes recent employment law updates in the UK. It discusses cases related to post-employment victimization, collective redundancy consultation, challenges to new tribunal fees, mandatory early ACAS conciliation, zero-hours contracts, penalties for employers losing tribunals, shared parental leave, flexible working requests, TUPE reform, changes to rehabilitation periods, sickness absence review, and a modern workplaces consultation.
These seminars are aimed at anyone who deals with employment law on a day to day basis, including HR managers and HR directors.
At these events we present an overview of what we consider to be the most significant cases decided in 2014, and what they teach about managing your workforce – together with our practical tips.
Also hear about what is coming up in 2015, and how you can get ready for what will be another busy year in employment law.
Topics that are covered include:
• changes to TUPE
• changes to flexible working
• shared parental leave
• the holiday pay cases
• equal pay audits
• social media
• zero hours contracts
• discrimination update
• what’s coming up in 2015.
The presentation will consider the legislative changes introduced since the 2014 PPMA conference and examine further proposed changes, particularly the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill.
This document provides an update on recent employment law legislation and case law in the UK. It covers the following key points:
1) Recent legislation includes extending the right to request flexible working to all employees, banning exclusivity clauses in zero-hours contracts, and introducing shared parental leave starting in April 2015.
2) Notable case law includes rulings that post-employment victimization is prohibited, obesity is not a disability, overtime must be included in annual leave calculations, and employers must offer suitable alternative roles to women on maternity leave who are made redundant.
3) The introduction of tribunal fees has led to a massive decrease in employment tribunal applications, though legal challenges against the fees are ongoing.
Employment Law Update: essential updates and practical guidance for employersPat Coyle
A broad-ranging presentation focussed on keeping you up to date with current Employment Law and the effect that legislative changes and case law may have on your business or workplace
The document summarizes updates to UK employment law presented by solicitors at Springhouse Solicitors. Key points include:
- New TUPE regulations make dismissals following a transfer less likely to be unfair and make changing employee contracts after a transfer easier.
- Mandatory ACAS conciliation requires claimants to notify ACAS before bringing employment claims and engage in mandatory conciliation.
- New whistleblowing laws require disclosures to be in the public interest rather than just made in good faith.
- Flexible working laws now give all employees the right to request flexible working regardless of caring responsibilities.
- New parental rights include shared parental leave allowing parents to share maternity/adoption leave and pay.
-
The document provides an agenda and summaries for an employment law update presentation covering the following topics: equal pay audits, tribunal fees, zero-hours contracts, shared parental leave, antenatal appointments, employer's rights on termination, redundancy and discrimination, forced retirement, and social media. Key cases and proposed legal changes are briefly outlined for each topic in one to three sentences.
It’s a jungle out there but we know july 2014michaelhnewman
NewmanHR provides bespoke employment law and HR consulting services to small and medium businesses. They help clients navigate complex employment regulations to avoid stress and reduce costs. As business owners themselves, they understand business pressures and provide commonsense HR solutions. The document outlines several 2014 legal developments including changes to tribunal fees and processes, social media policies, flexible working, holiday pay calculations, and shared parental leave plans. It emphasizes that NewmanHR can help businesses understand and comply with regulations through services like contracts, policies, and advice.
The document summarizes the agenda and key topics from a Greater Manchester Good Employment Charter Supporters' Network Event on March 11, 2020. The event included an employment law update covering recent changes to statutory payments and legislation, a discussion of Charter development, and implications of recent legal cases. Public health guidance related to COVID-19 was also provided. Upcoming consultations on topics like parental leave and one-sided flexibility were outlined.
The document discusses constructive dismissal, including what it is, how it can be triggered, new developments in the doctrine, and how employers can protect against potential claims. Specifically:
- Constructive dismissal occurs when an employer makes a substantial, unilateral change to a fundamental term of employment that the employee rejects by treating their employment as ended.
- New cases have established that employees must mitigate damages by accepting offers to return to work, and that employers may acquiesce to an employee working under original terms by not implementing planned changes.
- Economic conditions and legislation like Bill 168 impact courts' views; employers should define change terms contractually, give notice of changes, and document acceptance of past similar changes.
This document summarizes five key employment law cases from 2015:
1. McConaghie v. Systemgroup Consulting Inc. found an employer discriminated against a female employee by holding a "Men's Day" event that excluded her. The employer was ordered to pay damages.
2. Wilson v. Atomic Energy established that without cause dismissals under the Canada Labour Code are not automatically unjust, allowing some flexibility for employers.
3. Thompson v. Cardel Homes was found to be a constructive dismissal when the employer asked an employee not to return to work before the end of their fixed term contract.
4. Paquette v. Quadraspec Inc. determined that termination pay must include
This document provides an overview and update on recent employment law developments in three key areas:
1. Shared Parental Leave - New regulations allow eligible parents to share up to 50 weeks of leave and 37 weeks of pay during the first year of a child's life.
2. Holiday Pay - Recent court rulings found that non-guaranteed overtime and other elements intrinsically linked to work must be included in holiday pay calculations. Employers will need to review their holiday pay policies.
3. Pensions Auto-Enrollment - Reforms require employers to automatically enroll eligible employees into a workplace pension scheme. Employers must understand their duties to comply with auto-enrollment requirements.
Discrimination law and family friendly rightsLewis Silkin
This document summarizes recent changes and proposed changes to UK discrimination and family friendly employment laws. It discusses the repeal of discrimination questionnaires and the abolition of liability for third party harassment. It also outlines new proposals for shared parental leave allowing parents to share up to 50 weeks of leave and 37 weeks of pay. Other proposals addressed include equal pay audits, flexible working requests, paternity leave, adoption leave, and unpaid parental leave.
Employment Law Update April 2015 (CIPD)Shorebird RPO
These slides compliment the free webinar, Marie Walsh presented on an overview of recent, forthcoming and proposed changes in employment law, and their impact on employers and HR practitioners.
Marie will also discussed case law and best practice.
This webinar will be repeated live on the 27th May 2015. To find out more or to book, please visit http://shorebird-rpo.com/free-webinars/item/employment-law-update-may-2015
This document summarizes recent and proposed reforms to UK unfair dismissal law. Key points include:
- The qualifying period for unfair dismissal claims will increase to 2 years for employees hired after April 2012.
- Compensation awards will be capped at £74,200 or one year's salary.
- Fees of £250-£950 will be introduced for unfair dismissal claims from Summer 2013.
- From 2014, employees must contact ACAS to attempt conciliation before filing a tribunal claim.
- New "employee owner contracts" may allow employers to offer shares worth £2,000-£50,000 in exchange for employees giving up most unfair dismissal rights.
- Protected settlement discussions will be renamed but
Unfair dismissal and employment tribunalsLewis Silkin
The document summarizes recent changes to UK employment law regarding unfair dismissal claims and tribunals. It discusses qualifying periods for unfair dismissal, exceptions for political dismissals, procedures for tribunals such as judges sitting alone and reading witness statements as read. It also outlines new rules around fees for claims, mandatory ACAS conciliation, pre-termination negotiations, caps on compensation, deposit orders, costs awards, and "Calderbank" offers to settle. The changes aim to streamline procedures and deter vexatious claims while facilitating early settlement.
Employment Law Seminar: Disputes, Settlements and Employment Law Updates 2014IBB Law
IBB Solicitors' employment lawyers, based in West London, delivered a seminar to HR executives. The seminar covered:
Negotiating an exit- the situation prior to July 29 2013
Pre-termination negotiations after 29 July 2013
“Any offer made or discussions held before the termination
of the employment in question, with a view to it being
terminated on terms agreed”
• Cannot be used as evidence in ordinary unfair dismissal cases
• Unless improper behaviour
• Non-monetary offers
• Even if no eventual settlement
• Still have WP principles (Portnykh -v- Nomura)
Limitations
• Only ordinary unfair dismissal cases
• Not automatic unfair dismissal, not discrimination, not breach
of contract
• Increase in multiple claims
• Everyone has a protected characteristic
• Risk assess
Acas code of practice and guidance
• Guidance broad and general
• Useful examples, but not all the answers
• Need case law, although doesn’t always help
• Trying to formalise an informal process
Some issues
• Chronology – letter, meeting, agreement?
• Should allow employee to be accompanied
• Militates to letter first
• Allow time to consider offer (10 calendar days to consider
proposed formal written terms of a settlement agreement)
• Template letters – useful, current caution around amending
• Create precedent letter
Improper behaviour
• Harrassment, bullying, intimidation, offensive words, aggressive behaviour, physical assault (or
threat), criminal behaviour, victimisation, discrimination
• Undue pressure, e.g. not giving reasonable time for consideration of proposed written terms. 10
calendar days recommended (unless agreed otherwise)
• Stating (before disciplinary process) that employee will be dismissed if offer rejected (as
opposed to stating that disciplinary process will commence)
Unfair dismissal compensatory award
• Basic award - £464
• Compensatory award – lesser of £76,574 or 52 weeks’ actual gross pay
• Law firm challenge – judicial review
- R (on the application of Compromise Agreements Ltd) v
Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills
Case law update:
calculation of holiday pay- commission
• EU Law- at Least four weeks' paid Leave"
• Working Time Regs- a week's pay'
• WiLliams and others v 8ritish Airways Plc [2011] - normaL remuneration" includes any payment
intrinsically Linked" to the performance of tasks
• Lock v British Gas Trading Limited [2012]
- AG opinion: commission was intrinsically Linked to his role as a salesman
- Suggested that is averaged over the Last twelve months
Early conciliation
Mandatory for claims presented after 6 May 2014
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
More Related Content
Similar to Employment Law Update seminar - 5 June 2014
Yolk Recruitment - HR Insights Presentation, Employment Law UpdateYolk Recruitment
The document summarizes employment law reforms that are already in effect, imminent, and likely in the future in the UK. Reforms that are already in effect include increasing the qualifying service period for unfair dismissal claims to 2 years, reducing collective redundancy minimum consultation periods, and expanding whistleblower protections. Upcoming reforms include implementing employment tribunal fees, updating tribunal rules, changing compensation for unfair dismissal, and allowing pre-termination settlement agreements. Potential future reforms address changing the Equality Act, mandating early conciliation, permitting financial penalties for employers, expanding flexible working rights, and reforming fit notes and shared parental leave.
The document summarizes recent employment law updates in the UK. It discusses cases related to post-employment victimization, collective redundancy consultation, challenges to new tribunal fees, mandatory early ACAS conciliation, zero-hours contracts, penalties for employers losing tribunals, shared parental leave, flexible working requests, TUPE reform, changes to rehabilitation periods, sickness absence review, and a modern workplaces consultation.
These seminars are aimed at anyone who deals with employment law on a day to day basis, including HR managers and HR directors.
At these events we present an overview of what we consider to be the most significant cases decided in 2014, and what they teach about managing your workforce – together with our practical tips.
Also hear about what is coming up in 2015, and how you can get ready for what will be another busy year in employment law.
Topics that are covered include:
• changes to TUPE
• changes to flexible working
• shared parental leave
• the holiday pay cases
• equal pay audits
• social media
• zero hours contracts
• discrimination update
• what’s coming up in 2015.
The presentation will consider the legislative changes introduced since the 2014 PPMA conference and examine further proposed changes, particularly the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill.
This document provides an update on recent employment law legislation and case law in the UK. It covers the following key points:
1) Recent legislation includes extending the right to request flexible working to all employees, banning exclusivity clauses in zero-hours contracts, and introducing shared parental leave starting in April 2015.
2) Notable case law includes rulings that post-employment victimization is prohibited, obesity is not a disability, overtime must be included in annual leave calculations, and employers must offer suitable alternative roles to women on maternity leave who are made redundant.
3) The introduction of tribunal fees has led to a massive decrease in employment tribunal applications, though legal challenges against the fees are ongoing.
Employment Law Update: essential updates and practical guidance for employersPat Coyle
A broad-ranging presentation focussed on keeping you up to date with current Employment Law and the effect that legislative changes and case law may have on your business or workplace
The document summarizes updates to UK employment law presented by solicitors at Springhouse Solicitors. Key points include:
- New TUPE regulations make dismissals following a transfer less likely to be unfair and make changing employee contracts after a transfer easier.
- Mandatory ACAS conciliation requires claimants to notify ACAS before bringing employment claims and engage in mandatory conciliation.
- New whistleblowing laws require disclosures to be in the public interest rather than just made in good faith.
- Flexible working laws now give all employees the right to request flexible working regardless of caring responsibilities.
- New parental rights include shared parental leave allowing parents to share maternity/adoption leave and pay.
-
The document provides an agenda and summaries for an employment law update presentation covering the following topics: equal pay audits, tribunal fees, zero-hours contracts, shared parental leave, antenatal appointments, employer's rights on termination, redundancy and discrimination, forced retirement, and social media. Key cases and proposed legal changes are briefly outlined for each topic in one to three sentences.
It’s a jungle out there but we know july 2014michaelhnewman
NewmanHR provides bespoke employment law and HR consulting services to small and medium businesses. They help clients navigate complex employment regulations to avoid stress and reduce costs. As business owners themselves, they understand business pressures and provide commonsense HR solutions. The document outlines several 2014 legal developments including changes to tribunal fees and processes, social media policies, flexible working, holiday pay calculations, and shared parental leave plans. It emphasizes that NewmanHR can help businesses understand and comply with regulations through services like contracts, policies, and advice.
The document summarizes the agenda and key topics from a Greater Manchester Good Employment Charter Supporters' Network Event on March 11, 2020. The event included an employment law update covering recent changes to statutory payments and legislation, a discussion of Charter development, and implications of recent legal cases. Public health guidance related to COVID-19 was also provided. Upcoming consultations on topics like parental leave and one-sided flexibility were outlined.
The document discusses constructive dismissal, including what it is, how it can be triggered, new developments in the doctrine, and how employers can protect against potential claims. Specifically:
- Constructive dismissal occurs when an employer makes a substantial, unilateral change to a fundamental term of employment that the employee rejects by treating their employment as ended.
- New cases have established that employees must mitigate damages by accepting offers to return to work, and that employers may acquiesce to an employee working under original terms by not implementing planned changes.
- Economic conditions and legislation like Bill 168 impact courts' views; employers should define change terms contractually, give notice of changes, and document acceptance of past similar changes.
This document summarizes five key employment law cases from 2015:
1. McConaghie v. Systemgroup Consulting Inc. found an employer discriminated against a female employee by holding a "Men's Day" event that excluded her. The employer was ordered to pay damages.
2. Wilson v. Atomic Energy established that without cause dismissals under the Canada Labour Code are not automatically unjust, allowing some flexibility for employers.
3. Thompson v. Cardel Homes was found to be a constructive dismissal when the employer asked an employee not to return to work before the end of their fixed term contract.
4. Paquette v. Quadraspec Inc. determined that termination pay must include
This document provides an overview and update on recent employment law developments in three key areas:
1. Shared Parental Leave - New regulations allow eligible parents to share up to 50 weeks of leave and 37 weeks of pay during the first year of a child's life.
2. Holiday Pay - Recent court rulings found that non-guaranteed overtime and other elements intrinsically linked to work must be included in holiday pay calculations. Employers will need to review their holiday pay policies.
3. Pensions Auto-Enrollment - Reforms require employers to automatically enroll eligible employees into a workplace pension scheme. Employers must understand their duties to comply with auto-enrollment requirements.
Discrimination law and family friendly rightsLewis Silkin
This document summarizes recent changes and proposed changes to UK discrimination and family friendly employment laws. It discusses the repeal of discrimination questionnaires and the abolition of liability for third party harassment. It also outlines new proposals for shared parental leave allowing parents to share up to 50 weeks of leave and 37 weeks of pay. Other proposals addressed include equal pay audits, flexible working requests, paternity leave, adoption leave, and unpaid parental leave.
Employment Law Update April 2015 (CIPD)Shorebird RPO
These slides compliment the free webinar, Marie Walsh presented on an overview of recent, forthcoming and proposed changes in employment law, and their impact on employers and HR practitioners.
Marie will also discussed case law and best practice.
This webinar will be repeated live on the 27th May 2015. To find out more or to book, please visit http://shorebird-rpo.com/free-webinars/item/employment-law-update-may-2015
This document summarizes recent and proposed reforms to UK unfair dismissal law. Key points include:
- The qualifying period for unfair dismissal claims will increase to 2 years for employees hired after April 2012.
- Compensation awards will be capped at £74,200 or one year's salary.
- Fees of £250-£950 will be introduced for unfair dismissal claims from Summer 2013.
- From 2014, employees must contact ACAS to attempt conciliation before filing a tribunal claim.
- New "employee owner contracts" may allow employers to offer shares worth £2,000-£50,000 in exchange for employees giving up most unfair dismissal rights.
- Protected settlement discussions will be renamed but
Unfair dismissal and employment tribunalsLewis Silkin
The document summarizes recent changes to UK employment law regarding unfair dismissal claims and tribunals. It discusses qualifying periods for unfair dismissal, exceptions for political dismissals, procedures for tribunals such as judges sitting alone and reading witness statements as read. It also outlines new rules around fees for claims, mandatory ACAS conciliation, pre-termination negotiations, caps on compensation, deposit orders, costs awards, and "Calderbank" offers to settle. The changes aim to streamline procedures and deter vexatious claims while facilitating early settlement.
Employment Law Seminar: Disputes, Settlements and Employment Law Updates 2014IBB Law
IBB Solicitors' employment lawyers, based in West London, delivered a seminar to HR executives. The seminar covered:
Negotiating an exit- the situation prior to July 29 2013
Pre-termination negotiations after 29 July 2013
“Any offer made or discussions held before the termination
of the employment in question, with a view to it being
terminated on terms agreed”
• Cannot be used as evidence in ordinary unfair dismissal cases
• Unless improper behaviour
• Non-monetary offers
• Even if no eventual settlement
• Still have WP principles (Portnykh -v- Nomura)
Limitations
• Only ordinary unfair dismissal cases
• Not automatic unfair dismissal, not discrimination, not breach
of contract
• Increase in multiple claims
• Everyone has a protected characteristic
• Risk assess
Acas code of practice and guidance
• Guidance broad and general
• Useful examples, but not all the answers
• Need case law, although doesn’t always help
• Trying to formalise an informal process
Some issues
• Chronology – letter, meeting, agreement?
• Should allow employee to be accompanied
• Militates to letter first
• Allow time to consider offer (10 calendar days to consider
proposed formal written terms of a settlement agreement)
• Template letters – useful, current caution around amending
• Create precedent letter
Improper behaviour
• Harrassment, bullying, intimidation, offensive words, aggressive behaviour, physical assault (or
threat), criminal behaviour, victimisation, discrimination
• Undue pressure, e.g. not giving reasonable time for consideration of proposed written terms. 10
calendar days recommended (unless agreed otherwise)
• Stating (before disciplinary process) that employee will be dismissed if offer rejected (as
opposed to stating that disciplinary process will commence)
Unfair dismissal compensatory award
• Basic award - £464
• Compensatory award – lesser of £76,574 or 52 weeks’ actual gross pay
• Law firm challenge – judicial review
- R (on the application of Compromise Agreements Ltd) v
Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills
Case law update:
calculation of holiday pay- commission
• EU Law- at Least four weeks' paid Leave"
• Working Time Regs- a week's pay'
• WiLliams and others v 8ritish Airways Plc [2011] - normaL remuneration" includes any payment
intrinsically Linked" to the performance of tasks
• Lock v British Gas Trading Limited [2012]
- AG opinion: commission was intrinsically Linked to his role as a salesman
- Suggested that is averaged over the Last twelve months
Early conciliation
Mandatory for claims presented after 6 May 2014
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaintsseoglobal20
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
2. Family friendly changes
Children and Families Act 2014
• Time off for appointments
• Shared parental leave
• Flexible working for all
3. Time off for appointments
• Pregnant employees can already take paid
time off for ante-natal appointments
• From 1 October 2014, eligible employees
and agency workers will have the right to
take unpaid time off for up to 2 ante-natal
appointments of up to 6.5 hours each
• Eligible = partner of pregnant woman,
father of the child, or intended parent in a
surrogacy situation
4. Time off for appointments
• Adopters may take time off to attend
appointments to meet the child they intend
to adopt
• Single adopters allowed up to 5
appointments (with pay)
• Joint adopters can elect one person to
attend 5 and the other to attend up to 2
(unpaid)
5. Time off for appointments
• If the employer refuses to allow the time
off or refuses to pay – Tribunal can award
compensation of twice their hourly rate for
the time they were absent
• If an employee is dismissed or subjected to
a detriment for exercising the right –
automatically unfair
6. Shared parental leave
• A maximum of 52 weeks’ leave (39 of
which with statutory pay) to be shared
between parents (if they both have 26
weeks’ service with their employers)
• Applies where children expected to be born
or placed with them from 5 April 2015
• Protection from dismissal or detriment for
seeking to exercise the rights applies from
1 October 2015
7. Shared parental leave
• Compulsory maternity leave period will still
apply – shared parental leave can only
apply once maternity leave (or period of
maternity allowance) has ended
• Leave to be taken separately or
concurrently, and can be taken in blocks
• 20 KIT days per employee
8. Shared parental leave
• Applies equally to adopters and intended
parents in a surrogacy arrangement
• Adoption pay brought in line with SMP, i.e.
first 6 weeks at 90%
9. Shared parental leave
• Very complex requirements for notices etc.
• Ordinary paternity leave will still be
available (2 weeks)
• Guidance to be published ‘in the summer’
• Take up?
10. Flexible working for all
• From 30 June 2014
• All employees who have 26 weeks’ service
will have the right to make a request –
regardless of whether they are parents or
carers
• Current procedures abolished - employers
will have a duty to deal with requests
‘reasonably’
11. Flexible working for all
• ACAS Code of Practice – principles based
• Adapt your own policies and procedures
• Interaction with discrimination law
• Consistent and fair approach will be key
12. TUPE changes
• New Regulations in force 31 January 2014
• Pre-transfer collective consultation now
permitted, provided transferor and
transferee agree
• Service provision change – must be
“fundamentally or essentially the same”
• Changing the location of the workforce is
now expressly included as an ETO reason
13. TUPE changes
• From 1 May 2014 – employee liability
information now 28 days before the
transfer
• From 31 July 2014 – micro businesses
(less than 10 employees) can consult staff
direct, rather than through representatives
14. Whistleblowing changes
• 25 June 2013 – addition of the requirement
for public interest
• No need for good faith to claim – but if no
good faith, compensation can be reduced
by 25%
• Vicarious liability for detriment caused by
other workers
• Future reform?
15. Zero hours contracts
• What are they and how widely are they
used?
• Lots of media coverage about potential
reforms – no details of what or how yet
• Likely that reforms will be focused on
things like exclusivity clauses
• Watch this space!
17. Tribunal process changes
Since 6 April 2012:
• Judges sit alone in unfair dismissal cases
• Witness statements taken as read
• Deposit orders – cap increased from £500
to £1,000
• Cap on costs increased from £10,000 to
£20,000
18. ACAS Early conciliation
From 5 May 2014:
• Mandatory four-step pre-claim conciliation
1. Claimant to fill our Early Conciliation
form
2. Initial contact made by ACAS. If
Claimant proceeds, assigned to ECSO
19. ACAS Early conciliation
3. ECSO has one month to promote
settlement between the parties (can be
extended once for 14 days)
4. EC Certificate issued if settlement not
reached
• Claim cannot proceed without EC
Certificate
21. Introduction of fees
• Started on 29 July 2013
• Employment Tribunals were funded by
taxpayers - annual cost £84 million,
average £1,800 per case
• Transfer the burden on to those who use
the system or ‘who cause the system to be
used’
22. Fee structure
• Type A – wages, notice, redundancy etc
• Type B – unfair dismissal, discrimination,
equal pay, whistleblowing
• Issue fee = £160 or £250
• Hearing fee = £230 or £950
• (Discounts for multiple claims)
• Other fees, e.g. Dismissal fee = £60
(payable by Respondent)
24. Fees
• Tribunal can order unsuccessful party to
pay the successful party’s fees – but what
is ‘success’?
• No infrastructure in the Employment
Tribunals
25. Fees
• The remission system will apply fees –
already causing delays in the processing of
claims
• Only 5% of remission applications succeed
26. Tribunal fees
“I’m sure you’re very confident about your claim, but I’m
afraid we can’t accept a post-dated cheque.”
27. Fines for Employers
• Came into force 6 April 2014
• Judge can impose on employers who lose, if
the case has "one or more aggravating
features”
• 50% of award (min £100, max £5,000)
payable to the Exchequer – 50% discount for
prompt payment
• In addition to uplift under ACAS Code
28. Cap on Compensation
• Basic Award - £464pw
• Compensatory Award
£76,574 or
1 year’s gross pay
30. Neal v Freightliner Ltd (2013)
• Employment Tribunal
• Mr Neal a “multi-skilled operative” at the
company’s Birmingham depot
• Contractually obliged to work 35 hours a
week, but in reality he worked more (although
this was considered voluntary)
• Holiday pay calculated by reference to his
basic pay (based on 35 hours)
31. Neal v Freightliner Ltd (2013)
• Claim for unauthorised deduction from wages
& breach of WTR 1998 – overtime not
included in holiday pay
• EJ upheld Mr Neal’s claim – voluntary overtime
to be taken into account when calculating
holiday pay (based on 12 weeks before
holiday)
32. Neal v Freightliner Ltd (2013)
• WTR do not adequately implement the
Working Time Directive
• WTR interpreted purposively to give effect to
the Working Time Directive
• 4 weeks’ holiday rather than 5.6 weeks?
33. Lock v British Gas Trading Ltd (2014)
• Trend in Neal continues
• Claim for holiday pay to include commission
• European Court of Justice said workers must
be in a comparable position to when they are
working
• Warning – more case law & possible
legislation changes expected!
34. Punjab National Bank v Gosain (2014)
• Employment Appeal Tribunal
• Claims for sexual harassment, sex
discrimination & constructive unfair dismissal
• Claimant secretly recorded both the “public”
and “private” conversations connected with a
grievance hearing and a disciplinary hearing
• Were the private conversations admissible?
35. Punjab National Bank v Gosain
(2014)
• Tribunal said yes, and EAT agreed
• Balancing exercise
• Green light for employees to record hearings?
o Establish ground rules for hearings in
relevant policies
o Ask if there is a suspicion a hearing is being
recorded
36. Peacock Stores v Peregrine & ors
(2014)
• Employment Appeal Tribunal
• Implied term that employees contractually
entitled to enhanced redundancy payments
• Evidence that Peacock Stores paid without a
cap on years of service, and without a cap on
weekly pay
• Custom and practice
37. GM Packaging (UK) Ltd v Haslem
(2013)
• Employment Appeal Tribunal
• Two employees accused of gross misconduct
• Employer engaged external HR to conduct
disciplinary & appeal
• External HR sought authority to summarily
dismiss & to dismiss appeal from MD
38. Kisoka v Ratnpinyotip (t/a
Rydevale Day Nursery)
• Employment Appeal Tribunal
• An employee accused of gross misconduct
• Employee summarily dismissed and lodged an
appeal
• Employer arranged for appeal to be heard by
an independent body
39. Kisoka v Ratnpinyotip (t/a
Rydevale Day Nursery) (2013)
• Independent panel recommended that
decision to dismiss overturned
• Employer disagreed – did not implement the
recommendation
• Was the employer bound to follow the
decision of the independent body?
40. Gallop v Newport City Council (2013)
• Court of Appeal
• Awareness of employee’s disability
• Occupational Health reports said “not
disabled”
• Dismissed due to disciplinary allegations
41. Gallop v Newport City Council (2013)
• Claims for unfair dismissal, direct disability
discrimination and failure to make reasonable
adjustments
• Criticised for “unquestioning adoption of
Occupational Health’s unreasoned opinion”
• Employer must make factual judgment on
whether an employee is or is not disabled
42. BS v Dundee City Council (2013)
• Scottish Court of Session
• Employee dismissed after 272 days sickness
absence
• Occupational Health reports obtained
43. BS v Dundee City Council (2013)
• Employee brought claim for unfair dismissal,
seeking reinstatement to his job
• Was it fair to dismiss?
• Challenge poor occupational health reports!
44. Croft Vets Ltd & ors v Butcher (2013)
• Employment Appeal Tribunal
• Employee off work due to clinical depression
• Occupational health recommended counselling
• Employer raised queries, resulting in
significant delays
45. Croft Vets Ltd & ors v Butcher (2013)
• Employee resigned, claiming constructive
unfair dismissal and disability discrimination
• Payment for counselling was a reasonable
adjustment in this case
• Depends on individual facts & financial
resources will be taken into account
46. Vision Events (UK) Ltd v Paterson
(2013)
• Employment Appeal Tribunal
• Flexi-hours scheme in place
• Documentation silent on what happens to
those hours at the end of employment
• Employee made redundant – 1043 hours of
flexi-time outstanding (approx £12,500)
47. Vision Events (UK) Ltd v Paterson
(2013)
• Employer offered to pay a portion – this was
refused
• Claims for unfair dismissal & unlawful
deductions
• No implied term in contract that these hours
would be paid
48. Wright v North Ayrshire Council
(2013)
• Employment Appeal Tribunal
• Employee resigned for personal & work
reasons
• Claim for constructive unfair dismissal
• Did breach by employer play a part in the
resignation?
49. Cleeve Link Limited v Bryla (2013)
• Employment Appeal Tribunal
• Ms Bryla employed for 12 weeks
• Employer paid a candidate fee & costs of a
flight
• Contract provided for costs to be recouped by
employer if employment ended early on
50. Cleeve Link Limited v Bryla (2013)
• Ms Bryla dismissed for gross misconduct
• Costs paid were deducted from last wages
• Claim for unlawful deduction from wages
• A penalty clause or genuine pre-estimate of
loss?